Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -44,8 +44,7 @@ In Figure 2, we perform two ablations:
|
|
44 |
|
45 |
- (a) After first hot swap, we continued training on the corpus #1 for a while. Result: The fact that test loss is slightly better, signifies the slight difference between distribution of corpus #1 and corpus #2.
|
46 |
- (b) On step 94,000, the training loss stopped decreasing, increased, and around step 120,000 (near hot swap #2) started decreasing again. To ablate whether this was an effect of hot-swap, we resume training from step 93,000 using corpus #3.The optimizer states were reinitialized. Result: Neither corpus #3, nor optimizier state reinitialization seems to mitigate the issue of local divergence at step 94,000.
|
47 |
-
|
48 |
-
-
|
49 |
<img src="figures/vloss_closeup.png" width="900"/>
|
50 |
Figure 3: Test loss closeup, testing performed on split of internal-corpus #1. See Figure 2 description for ablation explanation.
|
51 |
|
@@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ Figure 3: Test loss closeup, testing performed on split of internal-corpus #1. S
|
|
54 |
### Vocabulary Swap
|
55 |
To transfer knowledge from English model to Czech, we developed a simple method that (i) aligns several tokens between two vocabularies and (ii) copies the embeddings from original language to new language.
|
56 |
<img src="figures/tllama_test.png" width="900"/>
|
57 |
-
|
58 |
Figure 4: Ablation: Test perplexity over the course of training for vocabulary swap method on TinyLLAMA. Our method (green curve) vs TinyLLAMA training from scratch (blue curve).
|
59 |
|
60 |
The vocabulary swap was done the same way as our [Czech-GPT-2](https://huggingface.co/BUT-FIT/Czech-GPT-2-XL-133k) model (check it out for comprehensive description.)
|
|
|
44 |
|
45 |
- (a) After first hot swap, we continued training on the corpus #1 for a while. Result: The fact that test loss is slightly better, signifies the slight difference between distribution of corpus #1 and corpus #2.
|
46 |
- (b) On step 94,000, the training loss stopped decreasing, increased, and around step 120,000 (near hot swap #2) started decreasing again. To ablate whether this was an effect of hot-swap, we resume training from step 93,000 using corpus #3.The optimizer states were reinitialized. Result: Neither corpus #3, nor optimizier state reinitialization seems to mitigate the issue of local divergence at step 94,000.
|
47 |
+
|
|
|
48 |
<img src="figures/vloss_closeup.png" width="900"/>
|
49 |
Figure 3: Test loss closeup, testing performed on split of internal-corpus #1. See Figure 2 description for ablation explanation.
|
50 |
|
|
|
53 |
### Vocabulary Swap
|
54 |
To transfer knowledge from English model to Czech, we developed a simple method that (i) aligns several tokens between two vocabularies and (ii) copies the embeddings from original language to new language.
|
55 |
<img src="figures/tllama_test.png" width="900"/>
|
|
|
56 |
Figure 4: Ablation: Test perplexity over the course of training for vocabulary swap method on TinyLLAMA. Our method (green curve) vs TinyLLAMA training from scratch (blue curve).
|
57 |
|
58 |
The vocabulary swap was done the same way as our [Czech-GPT-2](https://huggingface.co/BUT-FIT/Czech-GPT-2-XL-133k) model (check it out for comprehensive description.)
|