Update README.md

README.md

@@ -23,6 +23,11 @@ Yet, unlike those ChatGPT kaboodles that morph into self-absorbed, constipated g
 # Info
 Karen, Version 2, uses a completely different data set and base model than the previous Karen.
 
+# There are two versions of Karen
+
+1. Strict (this one), in which Karen will try not to make too many changes to your original text, only fixing grammar and spelling, assuming that you know what you are doing.
+2. Relaxed, in which Karen may suggest contextual improvements or rephrasing where necessary. It's Karen, after a glass of wine.
+
 # Goals
 Karen's goal is to fix grammatical and spelling errors with as light a change to the style as possible. It's tuned to catch most typical ESL errors. 
 
@@ -94,8 +99,25 @@ Karen could also be employed in the instruction/chat, but the minute you ran a l
 
 Example:
 
->Edit the following text for spelling and grammar mistakes: Each of candidates’ names were written on pieces of paper folded in half and placed in the appropriate box.
+>Edit the following text for spelling and grammar mistakes: I see future writing more about you writing the story any way you can and LLM editing it and making it into a proper fiction. That seems to be more satisfying way where you could feel you actually had done something creATIVE. So human is the creative, LLM is the burger flipping intern.
+>The opposite is what many people are trying rn. Make LLM to invent story (from premise, to creating outline to writing actual chapters) and the human to somehow assemble it from those pieces. So LLM is the creative man, and human is the floor polisher.
+>I can't believe a normal person would find it satisfying long term.
+>So in my view, the job of editor would be replaced by Ai, not the job of author.
+
+Output STRICT:
+
+>I see the future of writing being more about you writing the story any way you can and having an AI like LLM edit it and make it into a proper fiction. That seems to be a more satisfying way where you could feel you actually did something creative. So humans are the creative ones, while LLMs are the burger-flipping interns.
+>
+>On the other hand, many people are currently trying to do the exact opposite. They want to make LLMs create stories (from premises, to outlining, to writing entire chapters). And then they want humans to somehow piece them together from these parts. In this scenario, LLMs become the creative individuals, and humans become the floor polishers.
+>
+>I can't imagine a regular person finding that satisfying over the long run.
+>
+>In my opinion, the role of an editor will eventually be taken over by AI, not the role of an author.
 
-Output:
+Output CREATIVE:
 
->Each of the candidates' names was written on pieces of paper, folded in half, and placed in the appropriate boxes..
+>I see the future of writing being more focused on you writing the story any way you can and having an AI like GPT-3 edit it and turn it into a proper piece of fiction. This seems to be a more satisfying approach where you can truly feel that you have done something creative. In this scenario, humans remain the creative force, while the AI acts as the burger flipping intern.
+>
+>On the other hand, there are those who argue that we should let the AI generate stories from scratch - from coming up with a premise, to outlining the plot, to writing individual chapters. They believe that the role of the human should then become one of assembling these pieces together. In this case, the AI becomes the creative mind, and the human takes on the role of a floor polisher.
+>
+>I cannot imagine how someone could find this satisfying over the long term. Therefore, in my opinion, the job of the editor will eventually be taken over by AI, not the job of the author.