JustinLin610 commited on
Commit
0740d09
1 Parent(s): cabbdca

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +1 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Qwen1.5-MoE is a transformer-based MoE decoder-only language model pretrained on
20
  For more details, please refer to our [blog post](https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwen1.5/) and [GitHub repo](https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen1.5).
21
 
22
  ## Model Details
23
- Qwen1.5-MoE employs Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, where the models are upcycled from dense language models. For instance, `Qwen1.5-MoE-A2.7B` is upcycled from `Qwen-1.8B`. It has 14.3B parameters in total and 2.7B activated parameters during runtime, while achieching comparable performance to `Qwen1.5-7B`, it only requires 20% of the training resources. We also observed that the inference speed is 1.8 times that of `Qwen1.5-7B`.
24
 
25
  ## Training details
26
  We pretrained the models with a large amount of data, and we post-trained the models with both supervised finetuning and direct preference optimization. However, DPO leads to improvements in human preference evaluation but degradation in benchmark evaluation. In the very near future, we will fix both problems.
 
20
  For more details, please refer to our [blog post](https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwen1.5/) and [GitHub repo](https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen1.5).
21
 
22
  ## Model Details
23
+ Qwen1.5-MoE employs Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, where the models are upcycled from dense language models. For instance, `Qwen1.5-MoE-A2.7B` is upcycled from `Qwen-1.8B`. It has 14.3B parameters in total and 2.7B activated parameters during runtime, while achieching comparable performance to `Qwen1.5-7B`, it only requires 25% of the training resources. We also observed that the inference speed is 1.74 times that of `Qwen1.5-7B`.
24
 
25
  ## Training details
26
  We pretrained the models with a large amount of data, and we post-trained the models with both supervised finetuning and direct preference optimization. However, DPO leads to improvements in human preference evaluation but degradation in benchmark evaluation. In the very near future, we will fix both problems.