Text-to-Image
English
rockeycoss commited on
Commit
ab5641a
1 Parent(s): d544c41

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +23 -10
README.md CHANGED
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ language:
6
  - en
7
  pipeline_tag: text-to-image
8
  ---
9
- # Step-aware Preference Optimization: Aligning Preference with Denoising Performance at Each Step
10
 
11
  <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04314"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Paper-arXiv-red?style=for-the-badge" height=22.5></a>
12
  <a href="https://github.com/RockeyCoss/SPO"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Gihub-Code-succees?style=for-the-badge&logo=GitHub" height=22.5></a>
@@ -23,15 +23,28 @@ pipeline_tag: text-to-image
23
 
24
  ## Abstract
25
  <p>
26
- Recently, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has extended its success from aligning large language models (LLMs) to aligning text-to-image diffusion models with human preferences.
27
- Unlike most existing DPO methods that assume all diffusion steps share a consistent preference order with the final generated images, we argue that this assumption neglects step-specific denoising performance and that preference labels should be tailored to each step's contribution.
 
 
 
 
28
  </p>
29
- <p>
30
- To address this limitation, we propose Step-aware Preference Optimization (SPO), a novel post-training approach that independently evaluates and adjusts the denoising performance at each step, using a <em>step-aware preference model</em> and a <em>step-wise resampler</em> to ensure accurate step-aware supervision.
31
- Specifically, at each denoising step, we sample a pool of images, find a suitable win-lose pair, and, most importantly, randomly select a single image from the pool to initialize the next denoising step. This step-wise resampler process ensures the next win-lose image pair comes from the same image, making the win-lose comparison independent of the previous step. To assess the preferences at each step, we train a separate step-aware preference model that can be applied to both noisy and clean images.
32
- </p>
33
  <p>
34
- Our experiments with Stable Diffusion v1.5 and SDXL demonstrate that SPO significantly outperforms the latest Diffusion-DPO in aligning generated images with complex, detailed prompts and enhancing aesthetics, while also achieving more than 20&times; times faster in training efficiency. Code and model: <a ref="https://rockeycoss.github.io/spo.github.io/">https://rockeycoss.github.io/spo.github.io/</a>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
35
  </p>
36
 
37
  ## Model Description
@@ -75,8 +88,8 @@ image.save('moon.png')
75
  If you find our work or codebase useful, please consider giving us a star and citing our work.
76
  ```
77
  @article{liang2024step,
78
- title={Step-aware Preference Optimization: Aligning Preference with Denoising Performance at Each Step},
79
- author={Liang, Zhanhao and Yuan, Yuhui and Gu, Shuyang and Chen, Bohan and Hang, Tiankai and Li, Ji and Zheng, Liang},
80
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04314},
81
  year={2024}
82
  }
 
6
  - en
7
  pipeline_tag: text-to-image
8
  ---
9
+ # Aesthetic Post-Training Diffusion Models from Generic Preferences with Step-by-step Preference
10
 
11
  <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04314"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Paper-arXiv-red?style=for-the-badge" height=22.5></a>
12
  <a href="https://github.com/RockeyCoss/SPO"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Gihub-Code-succees?style=for-the-badge&logo=GitHub" height=22.5></a>
 
23
 
24
  ## Abstract
25
  <p>
26
+ Generating visually appealing images is fundamental to modern text-to-image generation models.
27
+ A potential solution to better aesthetics is direct preference optimization (DPO),
28
+ which has been applied to diffusion models to improve general image quality including prompt alignment and aesthetics.
29
+ Popular DPO methods propagate preference labels from clean image pairs to all the intermediate steps along the two generation trajectories.
30
+ However, preference labels provided in existing datasets are blended with layout and aesthetic opinions, which would disagree with aesthetic preference.
31
+ Even if aesthetic labels were provided (at substantial cost), it would be hard for the two-trajectory methods to capture nuanced visual differences at different steps.
32
  </p>
 
 
 
 
33
  <p>
34
+ To improve aesthetics economically, this paper uses existing generic preference data and introduces step-by-step preference optimization
35
+ (SPO) that discards the propagation strategy and allows fine-grained image details to be assessed. Specifically,
36
+ at each denoising step, we 1) sample a pool of candidates by denoising from a shared noise latent,
37
+ 2) use a step-aware preference model to find a suitable win-lose pair to supervise the diffusion model, and
38
+ 3) randomly select one from the pool to initialize the next denoising step.
39
+ This strategy ensures that diffusion models focus on the subtle, fine-grained visual differences
40
+ instead of layout aspect. We find that aesthetic can be significantly enhanced by accumulating these
41
+ improved minor differences.
42
+ </p>
43
+ <p>
44
+ When fine-tuning Stable Diffusion v1.5 and SDXL, SPO yields significant
45
+ improvements in aesthetics compared with existing DPO methods while not sacrificing image-text alignment
46
+ compared with vanilla models. Moreover, SPO converges much faster than DPO methods due to the step-by-step
47
+ alignment of fine-grained visual details.
48
  </p>
49
 
50
  ## Model Description
 
88
  If you find our work or codebase useful, please consider giving us a star and citing our work.
89
  ```
90
  @article{liang2024step,
91
+ title={Aesthetic Post-Training Diffusion Models from Generic Preferences with Step-by-step Preference Optimization},
92
+ author={Liang, Zhanhao and Yuan, Yuhui and Gu, Shuyang and Chen, Bohan and Hang, Tiankai and Cheng, Mingxi and Li, Ji and Zheng, Liang},
93
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04314},
94
  year={2024}
95
  }