Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -1,199 +1,126 @@
|
|
1 |
---
|
2 |
-
|
3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
---
|
5 |
|
6 |
-
#
|
7 |
|
8 |
-
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
12 |
-
|
13 |
|
14 |
-
|
15 |
|
16 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
18 |
-
|
19 |
|
20 |
-
-
|
21 |
-
- **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
22 |
-
- **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
23 |
-
- **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
|
24 |
-
- **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
|
25 |
-
- **License:** [More Information Needed]
|
26 |
-
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
27 |
|
28 |
-
### Model
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
30 |
-
<!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
|
31 |
|
32 |
-
|
33 |
-
- **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
34 |
-
- **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
35 |
|
36 |
-
|
37 |
|
38 |
-
<!--
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
40 |
-
### Direct Use
|
41 |
|
42 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
44 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
45 |
|
46 |
-
|
47 |
|
48 |
-
|
49 |
|
50 |
-
|
51 |
|
52 |
-
|
53 |
|
54 |
-
|
55 |
|
56 |
-
[
|
57 |
|
58 |
-
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
59 |
|
60 |
-
|
61 |
|
62 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
64 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
66 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
68 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
70 |
-
|
71 |
|
72 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
74 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
76 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
78 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
80 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
82 |
-
[
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
84 |
-
|
85 |
|
86 |
-
|
87 |
-
|
88 |
-
|
89 |
-
|
90 |
-
|
91 |
-
|
92 |
-
|
93 |
-
|
94 |
-
|
95 |
-
|
96 |
-
|
97 |
-
#### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
|
98 |
-
|
99 |
-
<!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
|
100 |
-
|
101 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
102 |
-
|
103 |
-
## Evaluation
|
104 |
-
|
105 |
-
<!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
|
106 |
-
|
107 |
-
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
108 |
-
|
109 |
-
#### Testing Data
|
110 |
-
|
111 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
112 |
-
|
113 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
114 |
-
|
115 |
-
#### Factors
|
116 |
-
|
117 |
-
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
|
118 |
-
|
119 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
120 |
-
|
121 |
-
#### Metrics
|
122 |
-
|
123 |
-
<!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
|
124 |
-
|
125 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
126 |
-
|
127 |
-
### Results
|
128 |
-
|
129 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
130 |
-
|
131 |
-
#### Summary
|
132 |
-
|
133 |
-
|
134 |
-
|
135 |
-
## Model Examination [optional]
|
136 |
-
|
137 |
-
<!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
|
138 |
-
|
139 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
140 |
-
|
141 |
-
## Environmental Impact
|
142 |
-
|
143 |
-
<!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
|
144 |
-
|
145 |
-
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
|
146 |
-
|
147 |
-
- **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
|
148 |
-
- **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
|
149 |
-
- **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
|
150 |
-
- **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
|
151 |
-
- **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
|
152 |
-
|
153 |
-
## Technical Specifications [optional]
|
154 |
-
|
155 |
-
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
156 |
-
|
157 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
158 |
-
|
159 |
-
### Compute Infrastructure
|
160 |
-
|
161 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
162 |
-
|
163 |
-
#### Hardware
|
164 |
-
|
165 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
166 |
-
|
167 |
-
#### Software
|
168 |
-
|
169 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
170 |
-
|
171 |
-
## Citation [optional]
|
172 |
-
|
173 |
-
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
|
174 |
-
|
175 |
-
**BibTeX:**
|
176 |
-
|
177 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
178 |
-
|
179 |
-
**APA:**
|
180 |
-
|
181 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
182 |
-
|
183 |
-
## Glossary [optional]
|
184 |
-
|
185 |
-
<!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
|
186 |
-
|
187 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
188 |
-
|
189 |
-
## More Information [optional]
|
190 |
-
|
191 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
192 |
-
|
193 |
-
## Model Card Authors [optional]
|
194 |
-
|
195 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
196 |
-
|
197 |
-
## Model Card Contact
|
198 |
-
|
199 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
|
|
1 |
---
|
2 |
+
language:
|
3 |
+
- en
|
4 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-classification
|
5 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
6 |
---
|
7 |
|
8 |
+
# Llama-3.1-Bespoke-MiniCheck-7B
|
9 |
|
10 |
+
This is a fact-checking model developed by [Bespoke Labs](https://bespokelabs.ai) and maintained by [Liyan Tang](https://www.tangliyan.com/) and Bespoke Labs. The model is an improvement of the MiniCheck model proposed in the following paper:
|
11 |
|
12 |
+
📃 [**MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documents**](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.10774.pdf)
|
13 |
|
14 |
+
[GitHub Repo](https://github.com/Liyan06/MiniCheck)
|
15 |
|
16 |
+
The model takes as input a document and a sentence and determines whether the sentence is supported by the document: **MiniCheck-Model(document, claim) -> {0, 1}**
|
17 |
|
18 |
+
In order to fact-check a multi-sentence claim, the claim should first be broken up into sentences. The document does not need to be chunked unless it exceeds `32K` tokens.
|
19 |
|
20 |
+
`Llama-3.1-Bespoke-MiniCheck-7B` is finetuned from `internlm/internlm2_5-7b-chat` ([Cai et al., 2024](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.17297))
|
21 |
+
on the combination of 35K data points only:
|
22 |
+
- 21K ANLI examples ([Nie et al., 2020](https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.441.pdf))
|
23 |
+
- 14K synthetically-generated examples following the scheme in the MiniCheck paper, but with additional proprietary data curation techniques (sampling, selecting additional high quality data sources, etc.) from Bespoke Labs. Specifically, we generate 7K "claim-to-document" (C2D) and 7K "doc-to-claim" (D2C) examples. The following steps were taken to avoid benchmark contamination: the error types of the model in the benchmark data were not used, and the data sources were curated independent of the benchmark.
|
24 |
|
25 |
+
All synthetic data is generated by [`meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct`](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct), thus the name `Llama-3.1-Bespoke-MiniCheck-7B`.
|
26 |
|
27 |
+
**While scaling up the model (compared to what is in MiniCheck) helped, many improvements come from high-quality curation, thus establishing the superiority of Bespoke Labs's curation technology.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
29 |
+
### Model Variants
|
30 |
+
We also have other three MiniCheck model variants:
|
31 |
+
- [lytang/MiniCheck-Flan-T5-Large](https://huggingface.co/lytang/MiniCheck-Flan-T5-Large) (Model Size: 0.8B)
|
32 |
+
- [lytang/MiniCheck-RoBERTa-Large](https://huggingface.co/lytang/MiniCheck-RoBERTa-Large) (Model Size: 0.4B)
|
33 |
+
- [lytang/MiniCheck-DeBERTa-v3-Large](https://huggingface.co/lytang/MiniCheck-DeBERTa-v3-Large) (Model Size: 0.4B)
|
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
36 |
+
### Model Performance
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
38 |
+
Leaderboard screen shot will be here.
|
39 |
|
40 |
+
<!-- <p align="center">
|
41 |
+
<img src="./cost-vs-bacc.png" width="360">
|
42 |
+
</p> -->
|
43 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
45 |
+
The performance of these models is evaluated on our new collected benchmark (unseen by our models during training), [LLM-AggreFact](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lytang/LLM-AggreFact),
|
46 |
+
from 11 recent human annotated datasets on fact-checking and grounding LLM generations. **Llama-3.1-Bespoke-MiniCheck-7B is the SOTA
|
47 |
+
fact-checking model, despite a small size.**
|
48 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
50 |
+
# Model Usage
|
51 |
|
52 |
+
Please first clone our [GitHub Repo](https://github.com/Liyan06/MiniCheck) and install necessary packages from `requirements.txt`.
|
53 |
|
54 |
+
### License
|
55 |
|
56 |
+
Free for use for non-commercial purposes. For commercial licensing, please contact company@bespokelabs.ai.
|
57 |
|
58 |
+
### Throughput
|
59 |
|
60 |
+
We speed up Llama-3.1-Bespoke-MiniCheck-7B inference with [vLLM](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm). Based on our test on a single A6000 (48 VRAM), Llama-3.1-Bespoke-MiniCheck-7B with vLLM and MiniCheck-Flan-T5-Large have throughputs > 500 docs/min.
|
61 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
63 |
+
### Below is a simple use case
|
64 |
|
65 |
+
```python
|
66 |
+
from minicheck.minicheck import MiniCheck
|
67 |
+
os.environ["CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES"] = "0"
|
68 |
|
69 |
+
doc = "A group of students gather in the school library to study for their upcoming final exams."
|
70 |
+
claim_1 = "The students are preparing for an examination."
|
71 |
+
claim_2 = "The students are on vacation."
|
72 |
|
73 |
+
# model_name can be one of:
|
74 |
+
# ['roberta-large', 'deberta-v3-large', 'flan-t5-large', 'Bespoke-MiniCheck-7B']
|
75 |
+
scorer = MiniCheck(model_name='Bespoke-MiniCheck-7B', cache_dir='./ckpts')
|
76 |
+
pred_label, raw_prob, _, _ = scorer.score(docs=[doc, doc], claims=[claim_1, claim_2])
|
77 |
|
78 |
+
print(pred_label) # [1, 0]
|
79 |
+
print(raw_prob) # [0.9859177240606697, 0.012431238696923606]
|
80 |
+
```
|
81 |
|
82 |
+
### Test on our [LLM-AggreFact](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lytang/LLM-AggreFact) Benchmark
|
83 |
|
84 |
+
```python
|
85 |
+
import pandas as pd
|
86 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
87 |
+
from minicheck.minicheck import MiniCheck
|
88 |
+
import os
|
89 |
+
os.environ["CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES"] = "0"
|
90 |
|
91 |
+
# load 29K test data
|
92 |
+
df = pd.DataFrame(load_dataset("lytang/LLM-AggreFact")['test'])
|
93 |
+
docs = df.doc.values
|
94 |
+
claims = df.claim.values
|
95 |
|
96 |
+
scorer = MiniCheck(model_name='Bespoke-MiniCheck-7B', cache_dir='./ckpts')
|
97 |
+
pred_label, raw_prob, _, _ = scorer.score(docs=[doc, doc], claims=[claim_1, claim_2]) # ~ 500 docs/min, depending on hardware
|
98 |
+
```
|
99 |
|
100 |
+
To evaluate the result on the benchmark
|
101 |
+
```python
|
102 |
+
from sklearn.metrics import balanced_accuracy_score
|
103 |
|
104 |
+
df['preds'] = pred_label
|
105 |
+
result_df = pd.DataFrame(columns=['Dataset', 'BAcc'])
|
106 |
+
for dataset in df.dataset.unique():
|
107 |
+
sub_df = df[df.dataset == dataset]
|
108 |
+
bacc = balanced_accuracy_score(sub_df.label, sub_df.preds) * 100
|
109 |
+
result_df.loc[len(result_df)] = [dataset, bacc]
|
110 |
|
111 |
+
result_df.loc[len(result_df)] = ['Average', result_df.BAcc.mean()]
|
112 |
+
result_df.round(1)
|
113 |
+
```
|
114 |
|
115 |
+
# Citation
|
116 |
|
117 |
+
```
|
118 |
+
@misc{tang2024minicheck,
|
119 |
+
title={MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documents},
|
120 |
+
author={Liyan Tang and Philippe Laban and Greg Durrett},
|
121 |
+
year={2024},
|
122 |
+
eprint={2404.10774},
|
123 |
+
archivePrefix={arXiv},
|
124 |
+
primaryClass={cs.CL}
|
125 |
+
}
|
126 |
+
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|