---
language:
- en
tags:
- sentence-transformers
- sentence-similarity
- feature-extraction
- generated_from_trainer
- dataset_size:53224
- loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
base_model: sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2
widget:
- source_sentence: are my notes shared with any third parties?
sentences:
- We may share data with social networks at your request.
- 'We may use the data we collect to:'
- Evernote is not in the business of selling or renting your information.
- 'Account information for third party services: If you interact with a third party
service when using our Sites, such as if you use a third party service to log-in
to our Sites (e.g., Facebook, Google, or Twitter), or if you share content from
our Sites through a third party social media service, the third party service
will send us information about you, such as information from your public profile,
if the third party service and your account settings allow such sharing.'
- With that in mind, when you purchase an item, your customer information may be
shared with other select companies whose products and services you may find useful
and those select companies will handle, store, retain, use, share and access personal
information in accordance with their own privacy policies, and we disclaim any
and all liability relating thereto.
- Usage activity, interactions within our apps
- where a third party claims that any content posted or uploaded by you to our Platform
constitutes a violation of their intellectual property rights, or of their right
to privacy.
- In addition, parts of the Service may be hosted by a third party on our behalf.
- source_sentence: which third party entities will have access to my data?
sentences:
- We also may share information about you with third parties whenever you consent
to or direct such sharing.
- All data transferred by us between your device and our services is encrypted.
- Processing your data in order to meet certain legal or regulatory obligations;
and
- In certain occasions, Khan Academy may share this data with business partners
to improve our services or offerings.
- We receive and store any information you enter on our Website or give us in any
other way.
- Does IMDb Share the Information It Receives?
- We also require that our suppliers protect such information from unauthorized
access, use, and disclosure.
- If Touchnote Limited or substantially all of its assets are acquired by a third
party, in which case personal data held by it about its customers will be one
of the transferred assets.
- source_sentence: '
In cases an agent is entrusted to perform any specific juristic act, if the agent
performs such act in accordance with the instructions of the principal, the principal
may not assert that the agent did not know a particular circumstance without negligence
which the principal did not know due to his/her negligence.
'
sentences:
- '
Article 406
If the subject matter of the claim is to be determined by a choice being made
from among more than one performance, the right to choose belongs to the obligor..
'
- '
Article 494
(1) In the following cases, a performer may deposit the subject matter of the
performance with an official depository for the benefit of the obligee. In such
a case, the claim is extinguished when the performer makes the deposit:
(i) the performer tenders the performance, and the obligee refuses to accept it;
or
(ii) the obligee is unable to accept the performance.
(2) The preceding paragraph also applies if the performer is unable to ascertain
the obligee;provided, however, that this does not apply if the performer is negligent
in this respect.
Article 474
(1) A third party may also perform an obligation.
(2) A third party that has no legitimate interest in performing an obligation
may not perform the obligation against the will of the obligor;provided, however,
that this does not apply if the obligee did not know that the performance is against
the will of the obligor.
(3) The third party prescribed in the preceding paragraph may not perform the
obligation against the will of the obligee;provided, however, that this does not
apply if the third party performs the obligation as requested by the obligor,
and the obligee knew this.
(4) The provisions of the preceding three paragraphs do not apply if the nature
of an obligation does not permit the performance by a third party or if a party
manifests the intention to prohibit or restrict the performance by a third party..
'
- '
Article 101
(1) If the validity of a manifestation of intention that an agent has made to
the other party is to be influenced by the absence of intention; by mistake, fraud,
or duress; or by the knowledge of or negligence in not knowing of a particular
circumstance; whether or not any such fact was present is decided as it concerns
the agent.
(2) If the validity of a manifestation of intention that the other party has made
to the agent is to be influenced by the recipient''s knowledge of or negligence
in not knowing of a particular circumstance, whether or not any such fact was
present is decided as it concerns the agent.
(3) If an agent who has been entrusted with performing a specific juridical act
performs that act, the principal may not assert that the agent did not know of
any particular circumstance of which the principal knew. The same applies to any
circumstance of which the principal did not know due to the principal''s own negligence..
'
- source_sentence: Are times zones, (i.e. a geo-spatial frame of reference) considered
in age based regulations? Bob was born in British Columbia (GMT-7) on March 7th
at 11 p.m. local time. Alice was born the next day, March 8th, in Nova Scotia
(GMT-3) at 1 a.m. local time, which is 2 hours before Bob was born, due to the
time zone difference. Bob and Alice are in Vancouver (GMT-7). It is Bob's 19th
birthday. Bob is of legal drinking age according to Canadian law and the birthdate
listed on his driver's license, Alice is not. They both have a glass of wine with
dinner. The legality of drinking is based on age, so could Alice be arrested for
underage drinking based on the birth date listed in her driver's license even
though she is technically "older" than Bob based on a geo-spatial frame
of reference? Or would the law consider her to be of legal age based on the time
zone of her birth, and the exact time of day she drew her first breath when compared
to local time?
sentences:
- 'canada In Canada, there are the separate offences of: sexual assault (premised
on lack of consent, no matter by what means consent is lacking; R. v. G.F., 2021
SCC 20) and administering a stupefying substance. If someone were to use a "substance
such as everyday alcohol" (I would reject the premise that this is "benign")
for the purpose of facilitating sexual assault, this would be an offence under
s. 246 of the Criminal Code. Section 246 makes it an offence for a person, "with
intent to enable or assist himself or another person to commit an indictable offence"
to administer or cause any person to take a "stupefying or overpowering drug,
matter, or thing." The Court of Appeal for Ontario has accepted that the
element of administering a stupefying thing could be established by oversupply
of alcohol. They have said that alcohol is a "stupefying substance"
(R. v. Vant, 2015 ONCA 481) and can support a conviction under s. 246. "Date
rape" has no legal significance and even criminologically, misframes the
circumstances in which people experience sexual assualt. Further, your premise
that intimate partner sexual assault "usually happens when someone uses narcotics
to drug another into an unconscious state" is not supported by the evidence.
While this is a criminological point, rather than a legal point, it is important
context for understanding such crimes. This 2005 study estimated that 4.6% of
intimate partner sexual assaults were facilitated by surreptitious drug use. These
two fact sheets describe the variety of circumstances, completely unrelated to
incapacitation by drugs, in which people experience intimate partner sexual assault/violence:
Fredericton Sexual Assault Crisis Centre Info Sheet; Centre for Research &
Education on Violence Against Women & Children Backgrounder on Intimate Partner
Sexual Violence.'
- 'Can the Secretary of State exempt people over 75 requiring a TV licence? Yes.
s.363(6) introduces the power to exempt those listed at (a) to (d) by way of Regulations.
s.6, paragraph 1 of the Communications (Television Licensing) Regulations 2004
states: No fee shall be payable for a TV licence of a type referred to in the
first or second entry in column 1 of the table in Schedule 1 where— (a) the licence
is issued to a person aged 75 years or more or to a person who will attain that
age in the calendar month in which the licence is issued; and (b) the single place,
vehicle, vessel or caravan specified in the licence is the sole or main residence
of that person. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/692/regulation/6?timeline=false
The first and second entries in column 1 at Schedule 1 refer to black and white
or colour TVs in a domestic setting or business purposes. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/692/schedule/1?timeline=false'
- 'british-columbia I am not aware of any judicial consideration of this issue.
The Liquor Control and Licensing Act, s. 78(1) says: A minor must not, except
as provided under this Act or unless the minor does so with other lawful excuse,
... consume liquor. (One of those exceptions are when the alcohol is supplied
by the minor''s parents, spouse or guardian in a residence for consumption in
the residence. There are other exceptions, too. But I''ll assume you''re asking
about a circumstance where no exception applies.) The Liquor Control and Licensing
Act defines a "minor" to be a person under the age of majority established
by the Age of Majority Act, which is age 19 today. The Liquor Control and Licensing
Act, s. 57 makes it an offence to contravene s. 78(1). The Interpretation Act,
s. 25.1 states that "A person reaches a particular age expressed in years
at the beginning of the relevant anniversary of the person''s birth date."
The Interpretation Act also clarifies that the reference to time "is a reference
to Pacific Standard Time" (or Pacific Daylight Saving Time, when it is in
effect). Thus, a person is a minor until "the beginning [in Pacific time]
of the relevant anniversary of the person''s birth date." It is most clear
in relation to the identification requirements when selling to a minor, but the
Regulations (s. 158) refer to the date of birth as displayed on the person''s
identification card. This all suggests that when consuming alcohol in the greater
Vancouver area, a person just about to reach the age of majority must wait until
the date in the Pacific time zone is that which is displayed on their identification.
Or barring any identification, until the date in the Pacific time zone is the
date that is the person''s birth date.'
- This is known as a retroactive or ex post facto law. Such laws are explicitly
forbidden by the US Constitution (Wikipedia reference), and are generally frowned
on in jurisdictions where the rule of law applies, partly because it is difficult
to prove criminal intent when your action was not at the time criminal.
- 'The place of birth on the birth certificate is where the child was actually born.
Indeed, usually it will be more specific than city and state or province and will
also identify a hospital or residence or other place where the birth happened.
So, for example, if a child is born to U.S. diplomats in Paris, France (in or
out of the embassy grounds), the birth certificate will say that the child was
born in Paris, France at Charles de Gaulle Hospital. But, that child will still
be a U.S. citizen in all likelihood, because that child''s mother, and/or married
father or unmarried father who acknowledges paternity, is a U.S. citizen (in all
likelihood) pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1401 and 1409. The child may or may not be
a French dual citizen depending upon the citizenship law of France. In the case
of a French diplomat who has a child born physically in Washington D.C. (inside
or outside the French embassy) the birth certificate will likewise state that
the child was born in Washington D.C. The French diplomat''s child, however, will
not be a U.S. citizen since Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution''s
first sentence (which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a)) states: All persons
born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,
are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. But a
French diplomat''s child is not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the
United States, so the French diplomat''s child does not gain U.S. citizenship
at birth (assuming for simplicity''s sake that both of the child''s parents are
French citizens and are not U.S. citizens) despite the fact that the child was
born in the United States.'
- Bob has no defense Speeding in western-australia, as it is throughout australia,
is a strict liability offense. That means that intention to or knowledge that
you are breaking the law is not required. Don’t know the limit? Doesn’t matter,
you are still legally obliged to comply. However, all the way up the chain, from
the police officer, through the administrative arm to the judge, each person has
discretion to waive the infringement notice. Basically, they can do that if they
don’t think it’s “fair” on Bob in the circumstances. Given that Bob managed to
reach 40+km/h within 20m of a more than 90 degree corner I think the infringement
notice is very fair. Negligent Driving is possibly the more appropriate offense.
However, it’s possible to imagine circumstances where waiving the infringement
notice is fair. For example, if a speed limit sign has been removed or completely
obscured by foliage or a parked vehicle and Bob could show he was not familiar
with the area. The question on Alice is, from above, moot.
- 'canada It depends on what the mens rea requirement is. Mens rea if not specified
in a criminal offence In Canada, if this is a criminal offence, and a mens rea
is not specified in the Criminal Code, the presumption is that the mens rea would
be satisfied by recklessness, knowledge, willful blindness, or intention (Pappajohn
v. The Queen, [1980] 2 SCR 120; R. v. Briscoe, 2010 SCC 13). The prosecution would
have to show that Alice was at least subjectively aware of the risk that she was
doing XYZ during the prohibited hours and proceeded nonetheless (this is recklessness;
Sansregret v. The Queen, [1985] 1 SCR 570 ). Based on the facts as you''ve presented
in the hypothetical, you may have ruled out the possibility that Alice was reckless.
Although, depending on the time of year, it may be that the sun sets around 9pm,
which may present some awareness of the risk that you have not accounted for in
your hypothetical. Mens rea if specified If the text of the statute does specify
a mens rea then that is what the prosecution needs to show. For example, if one
is prohibited from doing XYZ while "knowing" that it is after 9pm, then
the prosecution will have to demonstrate actual subjective knowledge of the time,
or wilful blindness (which Canadian law takes to impute knowledge: Briscoe). Additional
burdens to make use of some mistakes of fact Some offences put an even higher
burden on the accused in order to rely on a mistake of fact. In sexual offences
where the age of the complainant is relevant (e.g. that they 14 or younger, or
16 or younger, or 18 or younger), the accused cannot make out a mistake-of-age
defence without showing they took reasonable steps to ascertain the age (see Criminal
Code, s. 150.1).1 Presumptive mens rea for regulatory offences is much lower:
strict liability, subject to a due-diligence defence However, if this were a public-welfare/regulatory
offence, like a provincial traffic law, or a licensing restriction on an aviation
licence, or municipal by-law, there is no mens rea presumption. Rather, public-welfare/regulatory
offences prima facie fall into the category of strict liability offences, subject
only to a due-diligence defence (R. v. Sault Ste. Marie, [1978] 2 SCR 1299). Alice
would have to show that she had a "reasonable belief in facts which, if true,
would have rendered the act innocent". What it means to have a "reasonable
belief in facts" is very fact-specific.2 Alice has to hold the belief herself,
and the trier of fact must accept that a reasonable person would also have held
that belief. Just as in the case for recklessness, I can imagine that the timing
of sunset might pose a problem for a due-diligence defence in your particular
example. Absolute liability If the penalties for the offence do not include the
risk of imprisonment, the offence can even be declared to be an absolute liability
offence, in which due diligence is not even a defence (Re B.C. Motor Vehicle Act,
[1985] 2 SCR 486). 1. For example, simply relying on a complainant''s "language
and statements indicating that she could be 14 years of age or older did not constitute
taking reasonable steps or all reasonable steps to ascertain her true age in all
the circumstances, especially after being warned by her mother to stop all contact
or she would call the police and stating that the complainant was way too young
for him" (R. v. Dragos, 2012 ONCA 538). 2. For example, for the sale of alcohol,
"when the individual clearly appears to be underage, ... a duly diligent
permittee would require at least two more pieces of ID confirming that the person
was not a minor, question the individual about the ID, then decide if it is reasonable
to serve the individual alcohol versus the youthful appearance of the individual"
(Citynski Hotels Ltd. v. Saskatchewan, 2003 SKQB 314).'
- 'In principle, the data subject''s right to access involves a copy of all personal
data the controller holds on them. There are no time limits by default. Of course,
the controller can ask a data subject to clarify their request, e.g. to focus
on a particular time frame. There is an implied time limit though: personal data
may only be processed/stored for as long as the data is necessary to achieve the
purposes for which it was collected. Afterwards, it must be deleted. A controller
with good data management will be able to limit their effort by having as short
retention periods as possible for their different records. Furthermore, a lot
of data is not personal data, or falls out of scope of the GDPR because it is
not processed with automated means or forms part of a filing system. For example,
if thousands of old invoices were archived in paper form in boxes that are only
sorted by year, there might be an argument that this isn''t a filing system in
the sense of the GDPR and that a DSAR would not have to involve looking through
all the archived invoices (compare also Art 11). In your scenario, there is a
clear retention period of six years. You are asking for records about how that
data might have been used further in the past. To the degree that such data is
actually available, that could reasonably be personal data and should be included
in a response to a DSAR. E.g. they might have information like this: “File #1234
was included in a data set that was sold to EvilCorp in 2007. The entries in File
#1234 that are older than 2014 have been purged, so we do not know which entries
were included in the data set. The current name on File #1234 is Dave.” This information
about the sale would be personal data because it relates to you, and you are identifiable.
Of course, the controller might not be set up to perform this search unless specifically
asked. However, more unspecific information might not be personal data. For example:
“About 70% of our files were included in a data set that was sold to EvilCorp
in 2007. We no longer have records indicating whether your file was included.”
Since there is no link between the sale and your personal data, I don''t think
it would have to be included in a DSAR response. The primary reason why you should
be told about sales of personal data is that per Art 15(1)(c), you should be informed
about “the recipients or categories of recipient to whom the personal data have
been or will be disclosed” in a DSAR response. So when making a data subject access
request, it could make sense to explicitly referencing this paragraph. So you
would be interested in receiving a copy of your personal data as per Art 15 GDPR,
and in particular any available information per Art 15(1)(c) GDPR about the recipients
or categories of recipients to whom your personal data has been or may have been
disclosed in the past. Quite likely the response will be underwhelming, e.g. by
just giving a broad category such as “potential creditors who are contractually
obligated to use the data only in accordance with our policies”. Whether such
responses are compliant (I don''t necessarily think so) will not be clear until
there''s a good precedent, and that would require that someone sorts this out
in court.'
- source_sentence: 'Q: Can a car insurance company cancel my policy if payments where
made every month , claiming it was for non paymemt?. I was insured by Infinity
and was making installment. Payments on my policy , there was no changes on my
policy… on the 6 month of my policy they billed me for an amount deferent then
my schedule payments , increasing from 340 to 800 and the remaing months lowering
to 240 causing my payment to be declined '
sentences:
- 'A:So, who knows what they are thinking other than them? It is not clear to me
that THEY contact FCA for you or if you contacted FCA on your own first and then
FCA is responding to your contact or to their''s? That could make a difference.
As a lemon law attorney myself I can tell you a few things: a- It''s rare that
FCA offers a buy back without counsel involved; b- It''s more rare that they would
offer all the law allows; c- one usually gets a better result if one has counsel
involved; d- FCA will often not pay counsel or not pay much, pre-suit and will
be forced by a bad twist in the law, ironically sought out by folks like FCA,
to pay more once a case is filed in court. Your law firm has 23 people on their
website! That''s a huge number of mouths to feed. I hope they give you great service.
In closing, You should ask THEM these same questions! They are you lawyers and
they must answer you honestly.'
- A:Sorry to hear about your accident. The car that started the chain reaction accident
is at fault for all cars damaged including your property damage and personal injuries.
However, if your car is declared a total loss and your remaining car loan is greater
than the present market value of your car, you will be responsible for the (excess
loan over your car's value) unless you have gap insurance for your car. For further
information, contact my office at (240)676-4827. Thank you.
- A:Under California law, an insurance company typically cannot cancel a policy
for non-payment if payments were made consistently and in accordance with the
agreed-upon payment schedule. If you have evidence of regular payments and your
policy was canceled erroneously, you may have grounds to challenge the cancellation
and seek reinstatement of your policy. It's advisable to contact the insurance
company and, if necessary, consult with an attorney who can help you address the
situation.
- 'Whether you''re taking a vacation or using a loaner vehicle from your regular
car''s repair shop, you''ll need to procure some form of car insurance for your
rental car. Unfortunately, your auto insurance provider may not provide much direction
on this matter. In general, American auto insurers provide surprisingly little
rental-related guidance to their policyholders. For folks who regularly use rental
cars, this can be downright frustrating. Before you go on a trip or agree to accept
a rental car from an auto-repair shop, be sure to talk to your insurance company
about your coverage options. If you regularly travel on business, it''s likely
that your employer will pick up the tab for your rental car. If this is the case,
you''ll need to procure vehicle insurance through your rental car company. Unless
the company for which you work is particularly generous with its business travelers,
it probably won''t pay to insure your rental vehicle. Unfortunately, few personal
auto insurance policies provide coverage for vehicles that their policyholders
don''t rent on their own. As such, the fact that your employer is paying for your
rental car may make it difficult for you to obtain full coverage on it. While
you''ll still be protected against injury-related lawsuits and property damage
claims through your rental car company''s own insurer, you''ll be held personally
liable for any damage that you cause to the vehicle. This loophole has caught
many business travelers by surprise. In order to circumvent it, you''ll need to
purchase supplemental vehicle insurance from your rental car company. This could
add a significant premium to the total cost of your rental. If you''re traveling
for pleasure or renting a car in another capacity, this consideration will be
irrelevant. However, you may still need to purchase supplemental insurance from
your rental car company. Although there''s no hard-and-fast way to determine whether
your auto insurance policy covers you in the event of a rental-car accident, you
should still read your policy closely. It may explicitly state that it covers
rented or "non-owned" cars. If this is the case, you should feel free to file
an insurance claim for your rental car. On the other hand, your policy might not
say anything about "non-owned" vehicles. If this is the case, you should assume
that your rented vehicles aren''t covered by your policy. If you get into an accident
while driving a rental car, you may need to pay for its repair costs out of your
own pocket. '
- A:What does your mortgage say? IF it says they can randomly require you pay for
inspections, then yes, they can do what you describe. If it says they can force
you to pay for inspections whenever work is done on the property that too is something
they can do. If it doesn't say that, it's open to interpretation. Is $60 worth
suing them and paying thousands of dollars in attorney's fees over? Maybe the
BEST course of action is to pay off the loan and stop giving them any income.
It seems like you should be able to get a personal loan or use your savings to
pay off the final 2 years of principal balance and not dealing with companies
that want to make your life difficult is probably a good thing for other reasons
too! Remember, you're complaining about $60. How much effort do you want to put
into this? Just pay off the loan and TELL THEM WHY you're no longer doing business
with them.
- A:A North Carolina attorney could advise best, but your question remains open
for a week. The insurance company has a reasonable argument they provided a rental
and that that rental companies do charge deposits - the amount can vary by company.
The court may see them favorably in light of this - but other attorneys could
see it differently. You could consult with an attorney if it is worth pursuing,
either through a law firm or on your own. Good luck
- A:A Texas attorney could advise best, but your question remains open for a week.
That sounds like fraud. You could consult with local attorneys to ask how it is
treated under state-specific laws. Good luck
- 'If you''re going through a messy divorce in California, you''re probably wondering
whether you''ll be able to keep your health insurance coverage after its finalization.
After all, health insurance is tremendously expensive. If you''re unable to remain
covered under your ex-spouse''s employer-sponsored health insurance plan, you
might need to source health insurance coverage on the open market. Depending upon
your health profile and the needs of your children, this may cost a substantial
amount of money. Before you search for a new health insurance plan, you''ll want
to check with a seasoned divorce lawyer or health insurance expert to make sure
that you''re not eligible to remain covered. In fact, there are certain circumstances
under which you might be able to retain your ex-spouse''s health insurance coverage.
Under the applicable state and federal statutes, this "continuation of coverage"
is liable to be temporary. However, many divorces result in an arrangement that
requires the insured ex-spouse to issue regular cash payments to the uninsured
ex-spouse in lieu of providing health insurance coverage indefinitely. Alternatively,
the insured spouse may be compelled to set up and pay for a health insurance plan
that covers the uninsured ex-spouse in perpetuity. If the uninsured ex-spouse
remains the custodial parent after the divorce''s finalization, this plan will
almost certainly cover his or her children as well. In other words, California
law makes it likely that you''ll be able to retain health insurance coverage after
your divorce. However, the process of establishing and paying for such coverage
can be extremely tricky. For this reason, many Californian divorce lawyers advise
their clients to initiate legal separation proceedings at least one year before
beginning divorce proceedings. Once a legal separation order has been handed down,
it''s far easier for two partners to work out the continuation of health insurance
benefits on equal footing. Once the separation is official, you''ll need to determine
whether you''ll be eligible for federal COBRA coverage. COBRA permits certain
qualifying ex-spouses to remain covered by their former partners'' health insurance
plans for up to 18 months from the date of their divorce. However, COBRA benefits
are subject to numerous limitations. They may also be far more expensive than
the benefits that they replace. If you''re not sure whether opting for COBRA coverage
is a good idea, you should talk to your divorce lawyer. It''s possible that he
or she may be able to work out a deal that requires your ex-spouse to pay for
a portion of your COBRA benefits. '
datasets:
- sentence-transformers/coliee
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
library_name: sentence-transformers
---
# SentenceTransformer based on sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2
This is a [sentence-transformers](https://www.SBERT.net) model finetuned from [sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2](https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2) on the [coliee](https://huggingface.co/datasets/sentence-transformers/coliee) dataset. It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 384-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for semantic textual similarity, semantic search, paraphrase mining, text classification, clustering, and more.
## Model Details
### Model Description
- **Model Type:** Sentence Transformer
- **Base model:** [sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2](https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2)
- **Maximum Sequence Length:** 256 tokens
- **Output Dimensionality:** 384 tokens
- **Similarity Function:** Cosine Similarity
- **Training Dataset:**
- [coliee](https://huggingface.co/datasets/sentence-transformers/coliee)
- **Language:** en
### Model Sources
- **Documentation:** [Sentence Transformers Documentation](https://sbert.net)
- **Repository:** [Sentence Transformers on GitHub](https://github.com/UKPLab/sentence-transformers)
- **Hugging Face:** [Sentence Transformers on Hugging Face](https://huggingface.co/models?library=sentence-transformers)
### Full Model Architecture
```
SentenceTransformer(
(0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 256, 'do_lower_case': False}) with Transformer model: BertModel
(1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 384, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': True, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_weightedmean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_lasttoken': False, 'include_prompt': True})
(2): Normalize()
)
```
## Usage
### Direct Usage (Sentence Transformers)
First install the Sentence Transformers library:
```bash
pip install -U sentence-transformers
```
Then you can load this model and run inference.
```python
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
# Download from the 🤗 Hub
model = SentenceTransformer("bwang0911/jev2-legal")
# Run inference
sentences = [
'Q: Can a car insurance company cancel my policy if payments where made every month , claiming it was for non paymemt?. I was insured by Infinity and was making installment. Payments on my policy , there was no changes on my policy… on the 6 month of my policy they billed me for an amount deferent then my schedule payments , increasing from 340 to 800 and the remaing months lowering to 240 causing my payment to be declined ',
"A:Under California law, an insurance company typically cannot cancel a policy for non-payment if payments were made consistently and in accordance with the agreed-upon payment schedule. If you have evidence of regular payments and your policy was canceled erroneously, you may have grounds to challenge the cancellation and seek reinstatement of your policy. It's advisable to contact the insurance company and, if necessary, consult with an attorney who can help you address the situation.",
'A:A North Carolina attorney could advise best, but your question remains open for a week. The insurance company has a reasonable argument they provided a rental and that that rental companies do charge deposits - the amount can vary by company. The court may see them favorably in light of this - but other attorneys could see it differently. You could consult with an attorney if it is worth pursuing, either through a law firm or on your own. Good luck',
]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
print(embeddings.shape)
# [3, 384]
# Get the similarity scores for the embeddings
similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
print(similarities.shape)
# [3, 3]
```
## Training Details
### Training Dataset
#### coliee
* Dataset: [coliee](https://huggingface.co/datasets/sentence-transformers/coliee) at [d90012e](https://huggingface.co/datasets/sentence-transformers/coliee/tree/d90012e1f3a0d7103713bb2ce7faed1636a10090)
* Size: 9,260 training samples
* Columns: anchor
, positive
, and negative
* Approximate statistics based on the first 1000 samples:
| | anchor | positive | negative |
|:--------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| type | string | string | string |
| details |
A compulsory auction is also a sale, so warranty is imposed the same as for an ordinary sale.
|
Article 568
(1) The successful bidder at an auction based on the provisions of the Civil Execution Act and other laws (hereinafter referred to as an "auction" in this Article) may cancel the contract or demand a reduction of the price against the obligor pursuant to the provisions of Articles 541 and 542 and the provisions of Article 563
(including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 565).
(2) In the cases referred to in the preceding paragraph, if the obligor is insolvent, the successful bidder may demand total or partial reimbursement of the proceeds against the obligees that received the distribution of the proceeds.
(3) In the cases set forth in the preceding two paragraphs, if obligors knew of the absence of the object or right and did not disclose the same, or if obligees knew of the absence but demanded an auction, the successful bidder may claim compensation for loss or damage against those persons.
(4) The provisions of the preceding three paragraphs do not apply to the non-conformity with respect to the kind or quality of the subject matter of an auction..
|
Article 575
(1) If the subject matter of a sale which has not yet been delivered bears fruits, the fruits vest in the seller.
(2) The buyer bears the obligation to pay interest on the price beginning from the day of delivery;provided, however, that if a due date is provided for the payment of the price, it is not necessary to pay the interest until that due date arrives..
|
|
A compulsory auction is also a sale, so warranty is imposed the same as for an ordinary sale.
|
Article 568
(1) The successful bidder at an auction based on the provisions of the Civil Execution Act and other laws (hereinafter referred to as an "auction" in this Article) may cancel the contract or demand a reduction of the price against the obligor pursuant to the provisions of Articles 541 and 542 and the provisions of Article 563
(including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 565).
(2) In the cases referred to in the preceding paragraph, if the obligor is insolvent, the successful bidder may demand total or partial reimbursement of the proceeds against the obligees that received the distribution of the proceeds.
(3) In the cases set forth in the preceding two paragraphs, if obligors knew of the absence of the object or right and did not disclose the same, or if obligees knew of the absence but demanded an auction, the successful bidder may claim compensation for loss or damage against those persons.
(4) The provisions of the preceding three paragraphs do not apply to the non-conformity with respect to the kind or quality of the subject matter of an auction..
|
Article 596
The provisions of Article 551
apply mutatis mutandis to loans for use.
Article 551
(1) The donor is presumed to have promised to deliver or transfer the thing or right that is the subject matter of the gift, while maintaining its condition as of the time when it is specified as the subject matter of the gift.
(2) With respect to gifts with burden, the donor provides the same warranty as that of a seller, to the extent of that burden..
|
|
A compulsory auction is also a sale, so warranty is imposed the same as for an ordinary sale.
|
Article 568
(1) The successful bidder at an auction based on the provisions of the Civil Execution Act and other laws (hereinafter referred to as an "auction" in this Article) may cancel the contract or demand a reduction of the price against the obligor pursuant to the provisions of Articles 541 and 542 and the provisions of Article 563
(including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 565).
(2) In the cases referred to in the preceding paragraph, if the obligor is insolvent, the successful bidder may demand total or partial reimbursement of the proceeds against the obligees that received the distribution of the proceeds.
(3) In the cases set forth in the preceding two paragraphs, if obligors knew of the absence of the object or right and did not disclose the same, or if obligees knew of the absence but demanded an auction, the successful bidder may claim compensation for loss or damage against those persons.
(4) The provisions of the preceding three paragraphs do not apply to the non-conformity with respect to the kind or quality of the subject matter of an auction..
|
Article 520
If a claim and obligation becomes vested in the same person, such claim is extinguished;provided, however, that this does not apply if such a claim is the subject matter of the right of a third party..
|
* Loss: [MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
](https://sbert.net/docs/package_reference/sentence_transformer/losses.html#multiplenegativesrankingloss) with these parameters:
```json
{
"scale": 20.0,
"similarity_fct": "cos_sim"
}
```
### Training Hyperparameters
#### Non-Default Hyperparameters
- `per_device_train_batch_size`: 64
- `learning_rate`: 1e-05
- `warmup_ratio`: 0.1
- `fp16`: True
- `batch_sampler`: no_duplicates
#### All Hyperparameters