train/sft/medicalExam_en_dup.json

[
    [
        [
            "You are a medical doctor answering real-world medical exam questions. Select one correct answer from A to D.\nQuestion: Which of the following is not an etiological factor for pancreatitis? NOT RELATED -MEDICINE\nOptions:\n(A). Abdominal trauma\n(B). Hyperlipidemia\n(C). Islet cell hyperplasia\n(D). Germline mutations in the cationic trypsinogen gene",
            "The correct answer is (C). Islet cell hyperplasia"
        ],
        "Which of the following is not an etiological factor for pancreatitis?"
    ],
    [
        [
            "You are a medical doctor answering real-world medical exam questions. Select one correct answer from A to D.\nQuestion: Best diagnostic investigation for acute appendicitis in children is:(AIIMS May 2015, November 2014, May 2013.)\nOptions:\n(A). MRI\n(B). CECT\n(C). USG\n(D). X-ray",
            "The correct answer is (C). USG"
        ],
        "Best diagnostic investigation for acute appendicitis in children is:"
    ],
    [
        [
            "You are a medical doctor answering real-world medical exam questions. Select one correct answer from A to D.\nQuestion: The major concentrations of proprioceptive receptors providing information about position of the TMJ are located in:\nOptions:\n(A). The capsule and ligaments of the TMJ and the medial pterygoid muscle.\n(B). The capsule and ligaments of the TMJ and the lateral pterygoid muscle.\n(C). The articular disc of the TMJ and the medial pterygoid muscle.\n(D). The articular disc of the TMJ and the lateral pterygoid muscle.",
            "The correct answer is (A). The capsule and ligaments of the TMJ and the medial pterygoid muscle."
        ],
        "The major concentrations of proprioceptive receptors providing information about position of the TMJ are located in"
    ],
    [
        [
            "Context: To illustrate how maternal mortality audit identifies different causes of and contributing factors to maternal deaths in different settings in low- and high-income countries and how this can lead to local solutions in reducing maternal deaths. Descriptive study of maternal mortality from different settings and review of data on the history of reducing maternal mortality in what are now high-income countries. Kalabo district in Zambia, Farafenni division in The Gambia, Onandjokwe district in Namibia, and The Netherlands. Population of rural areas in Zambia and The Gambia, peri-urban population in Namibia and nationwide data from The Netherlands. Data from facility-based maternal mortality audits from three African hospitals and data from the latest confidential enquiry in The Netherlands. Maternal mortality ratio (MMR), causes (direct and indirect) and characteristics. MMR ranged from 10 per 100,000 (The Netherlands) to 1,540 per 100,000 (The Gambia). Differences in causes of deaths were characterized by HIV/AIDS in Namibia, sepsis and HIV/AIDS in Zambia, (pre-)eclampsia in The Netherlands and obstructed labour in The Gambia. \nQuestion: The use of audit to identify maternal mortality in different settings: is it just a difference between the rich and the poor?",
            "Differences in maternal mortality are more than just differences between the rich and poor. Acknowledging the magnitude of maternal mortality and harnessing a strong political will to tackle the issues are important factors. However, there is no single, general solution to reduce maternal mortality, and identification of problems needs to be promoted through audit, both national and local."
        ],
        "The use of audit to identify maternal mortality in different settings: is it just a difference between the rich and the poor?"
    ],
    [
        [
            "Context: To illustrate how maternal mortality audit identifies different causes of and contributing factors to maternal deaths in different settings in low- and high-income countries and how this can lead to local solutions in reducing maternal deaths. Descriptive study of maternal mortality from different settings and review of data on the history of reducing maternal mortality in what are now high-income countries. Kalabo district in Zambia, Farafenni division in The Gambia, Onandjokwe district in Namibia, and the Netherlands. Population of rural areas in Zambia and The Gambia, peri-urban population in Namibia and nationwide data from the Netherlands. Data from facility-based maternal mortality audits from three African hospitals and data from the latest confidential enquiry in the Netherlands. Maternal mortality ratio (MMR), causes (direct and indirect) and characteristics. MMR ranged from 10 per 100,000 (the Netherlands) to 1,540 per 100,000 (The Gambia). Differences in causes of deaths were characterized by HIV/AIDS in Namibia, sepsis and HIV/AIDS in Zambia, (pre-)eclampsia in The Netherlands and obstructed labour in The Gambia. \nQuestion: The use of audit to identify maternal mortality in different settings: is it just a difference between the rich and the poor?",
            "Differences in maternal mortality are more than just differences between the rich and poor. Acknowledging the magnitude of maternal mortality and harnessing a strong political will to tackle the issues are important factors. However, there is no single, general solution to reduce maternal mortality, and identification of problems needs to be promoted through audit, both national and local."
        ],
        "The use of audit to identify maternal mortality in different settings: is it just a difference between the rich and the poor?"
    ]
]