Upload prompt template fineweb-edu-prompt.yaml
Browse files- fineweb-edu-prompt.yaml +28 -30
fineweb-edu-prompt.yaml
CHANGED
@@ -1,36 +1,34 @@
|
|
1 |
prompt:
|
2 |
template:
|
3 |
- role: user
|
4 |
-
content: "Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a\
|
5 |
-
\
|
6 |
-
\
|
7 |
-
\
|
8 |
-
\
|
9 |
-
\
|
10 |
-
\
|
11 |
-
\
|
12 |
-
\
|
13 |
-
\
|
14 |
-
\
|
15 |
-
\
|
16 |
-
\
|
17 |
-
\
|
18 |
-
\
|
19 |
-
\
|
20 |
-
\
|
21 |
-
\
|
22 |
-
\
|
23 |
-
\
|
24 |
-
\
|
25 |
-
|
26 |
-
\
|
27 |
-
|
28 |
-
\
|
29 |
-
\
|
30 |
-
\
|
31 |
-
\
|
32 |
-
\ the extract: \n- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.\n- Conclude\
|
33 |
-
\ with the score using the format: \"Educational score: <total points>\""
|
34 |
template_variables:
|
35 |
- text_to_score
|
36 |
metadata:
|
|
|
1 |
prompt:
|
2 |
template:
|
3 |
- role: user
|
4 |
+
content: "Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational\
|
5 |
+
\ value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school\
|
6 |
+
\ to grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below.\
|
7 |
+
\ Points are accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:\n\n- Add 1 point\
|
8 |
+
\ if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational topics, even\
|
9 |
+
\ if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and promotional\
|
10 |
+
\ material.\n- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent\
|
11 |
+
\ to education but does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational\
|
12 |
+
\ content with non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially\
|
13 |
+
\ useful topics, or presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing\
|
14 |
+
\ style.\n- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and\
|
15 |
+
\ introduces key concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may\
|
16 |
+
\ not be comprehensive or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble\
|
17 |
+
\ an introductory section of a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning\
|
18 |
+
\ but has notable limitations like treating concepts that are too complex for grade\
|
19 |
+
\ school students. \n- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial\
|
20 |
+
\ for educational purposes for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear\
|
21 |
+
\ and consistent writing style. It could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or\
|
22 |
+
\ a tutorial, offering substantial educational content, including exercises and solutions,\
|
23 |
+
\ with minimal irrelevant information, and the concepts aren't too advanced for grade\
|
24 |
+
\ school students. The content is coherent, focused, and valuable for structured learning.\n\
|
25 |
+
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly\
|
26 |
+
\ suited for teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed\
|
27 |
+
\ reasoning, the writing style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights\
|
28 |
+
\ into the subject matter, devoid of any non-educational or complex content.\n\nThe\
|
29 |
+
\ extract:\n{{text_to_score}}.\n\nAfter examining the extract: \n- Briefly justify your\
|
30 |
+
\ total score, up to 100 words.\n- Conclude with the score using the format: \"Educational\
|
31 |
+
\ score: <total points>\""
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
template_variables:
|
33 |
- text_to_score
|
34 |
metadata:
|