Datasets:

id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
label
class label
2 classes
b1eb32a2267b22ea
" You can't debate this without reading it. Here it is. (begin) Unholy alliance An unholy alliance is a coalition among seemingly antagonistic groups, especially if one is religious, for ad hoc or hidden gain. Like patronage, unholy alliances are not necessarily illegal, but unlike patronage, by its deceptive nature and often great financial resources, an unholy alliance can be much more dangerous to the public interest. An early, well-known use of the term was by Theodore Roosevelt (TR): TAB ""To destroy this invisible Government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day."" - 1912 Progressive Party Platform, attributed to TRO'Toole, Patricia, ""The War of 1912,"" TIME in Partneship with CNN, Jun. 25, 2006. and quoted again in his autobiographyRoosevelt, Theodore. An Autobiography: XV. The Peace of Righteousness, Appendix B, NEW YORK: MACMILLAN, 1913. where he connects Trusts and monopolies (sugar interests, Standard Oil, etc.) to Woodrow Wilson, Howard Taft, and consequently both major political parties. TAB After the breakup of Standard Oil, TR lost the election, and the unholy alliance he had identified, oligopolies of a few big commodities corporations and their political allies, continued otherwise undeterred by the mutually beneficial indifference of both major political parties. In 1935, retired Marine Major General Smedley Butler described how this unholy alliance influenced U.S. foreign policy and how his job abroad had been to be a ""muscle man for big business."" In 1944, conservative journalist John T. Flynn described how this unholy alliance uses religion to sell its agenda abroad to the American public: TAB ""The enemy aggressor is always pursuing a course of larceny, murder, rapine and barbarism. We are always moving forward with high mission, a destiny imposed by the Deity to regenerate our victims while incidentally capturing their markets, to civilise savage and senile and paranoid peoples while blundering accidentally into their oil wells.""Flynn, John T. (1944) As We Go Marching. p. 240 TAB A reference to this unholy alliance today is: TAB Unholy Alliance, a review by PBS journalist, Rev. Dr. Allen Dwight Callahan of TAB Phillips, Kevin (2006) American Theocracy: The Peril and Politics of Radical Religion, Oil, and Borrowed Money in the 21st Century, Viking Press. TAB Other unholy alliances are the subjects of other books: TAB Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left, by David Horowitz TAB Unholy Alliance, by David Yallop, about the international drug trade and resultant political corruption TAB Unholy alliance: religion and atrocity in our time, by Marc H. Ellis TAB Unholy Alliance: A History of Nazi Involvement With the Occult, by Peter Levenda TAB Still other unholy alliances are found in ""Bootleggers and Baptists""Bruce Yandle, ""Bootleggers and Baptists: The Education of a Regulatory Economist."" Regulation 7, no. 3 (1983): 12. and Dixie Mafia. (end)"
0non
a4db90574c1a605a
In fact, I've just done it for you.
0non
a7c54e1c5c84fb17
" Question Hey, ! I saw that you were an administrator here, so I was just wondering if you might be able to answer a question I had. The thing is, I'm an admin on a different wiki, and another admin on the same wiki posted a question to the rest of the admins asking if there was a URL that can be used to show any user their current number of edits on the wiki. On our wiki, there's a page called Special:Editcount that conveys that information (I don't think Wikipedia has a page like this though), so another admin advised him to use this URL: http://_________.com/Special:Editcount/Username. That URL would achieve the desired result, but one would have to constantly put the username of the specific user at the end of the URL when posting it on that user's talk page, so my goal was to come up with a way to avoid that; almost to create something you could post on any user's talk page without changing any part of it and still get the desired result. I came up with this: {{fullurl:Special:Editcount/{{BASEPAGENAME}}}}, this way, one could just post the coding on the talk page of the desired user and the returned URL would automatically direct the user to their respective edit count. This worked successfully for every other user whose talk page I tested the coding on (without saving the page, of course); the only problem is that the user he wanted to do this for has an ""*"" both at the beginning and the end of their username (the second asterisk isn't a problem, just the first), meaning that instead of being returned as: it gets returned as: {{fullurl:Special:Editcount/ User*}} and doesn't take anyone anywhere, because it's just the raw coding. So I was just wondering if you knew of any way to circumvent this problem (aside from just telling him to post ""http://_________.com/Special:Editcount/*User*"" on the user's talk page, which isn't the end of the world, but is, of course, what I was trying to get around in the first place), maybe by putting some other form of coding that I'm not aware of somewhere in the existing coding or something. Any light you may be able to shed on this problem would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, 69.204.38.3 "
0non
917a09d7b87490b4
" Wrong, the Saint was named after the city, and Copacabana Rio was named after the Saint. But I guess your ""work"" here is done. Your precious Copacabana Bolivia, which you visited, is first on the list. You've spread your personal views at Wikipedia corrupting this encyclopedia, and then lied to others about Wikipedia not being ""the place for nationalistic displays"". 3 organizing methods the same result - this is Rsazevedo at work Good job, some Brazilian you are. "
0non
dce4df5e6350f9f4
" Hi, sorry, but I'm not currently active in AE. I recommend that you ask another administrator or the Arbitration Committee. "
0non
f865c8b5829d9bc4
" The ""Ma"" part of your name is apropos. Thanks for the scolding; I'm very, very chagrined and will never, ever disappoint you again. | 39 "
0non
6e1203e2175a4164
So this article is also an opinion piece. http://www.outlookindia.com/printarticle.aspx?22531 I am familiar with pupperty, you just started editiing i have edited for a long time, the only puppets here are you two hindoos
0non
c2bc975118e6ac04
oh no, here we go again
0non
a7e9fa79be12e8e8
" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Hello, Ral3787, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ☎ {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#"" ! Getting help |- |style=""color:#000""| Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question
0non
de1c1f3d6e738075
" I hope that current version of the paragraph is acceptable for us all, thus I do not think that we need further discussion about this. I think that User:ChrisO (who is not Serb) already explained to you why words ""so-called"" are not NPOV: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republic_of_Serb_Krajina#Naming_.22RSK.22 So, you two (Ceha and Afrika) should probably accuse him for Greater Serbian propaganda. LOL ))))) (talk) "
0non
af96461205872ac9
" Catherine, one can't miss knowing Sjoo has a bi-racial son. She refers to him as ""my bi-racial son."" I couldn't think of a reason why I would want to refer to my grandson as my ""bi-racial grandson""if I did, I would call myself racist. I am not denying that someone representing his/herself as a Bailyite may have been racist toward Sjoo's son, but this doesn't prove that Alice Bailey and all her followers are racist. When I was twenty I had a Jewish lover, who was forced into a Nazi camp when he was eight years old. In my mind, calling Alice Bailey or anyone anti-Semitic makes them equal to the horrific evil done to that 8 year old boy. And how carelessly the horrific mark of racism and Antisemitism is pinned on anyone that dares criticize, even if the criticism is that you a weak source for your anti-Semitic claims. It's a long time before racism and Antisemitism will endwe have good reason to be vigilant. Equally, there is a need to be vigilant about our human propensity to quickly judge one another and to ignore evidence contrary to our beliefs. For me, the golden years of religions are short lived. Alice Bailey's writings were not meant to last forever, much of her writings doesn't apply to our current consciousness. And yet, like any religion, movement, philosophy there are hidden gold nuggets that are eternally useful. Got to go, I'm way up past my old Grannie bedtime. Sparklecplenty "
0non
aa043978881fc535
" Notability of The real world inc A tag has been placed on The real world inc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. "
0non
2e11c2829b38d2cf
How was the external link inappropriate? Why did you also remove the other content I added?
0non
c0108538b2bdaaef
" I see that, however, being in the minority has never stopped me from arguing. ) I do not understand the ""separate section"" argument. The original argument for not having a separate section was that it is too long and the article itself is too long. The current version keeps all the content and is just as long, so I am not sure how that is relevant. However, I will not say any more, since I have already given all the arguments. "
0non
5ecca9c0f599f333
" I copy and pasted the ""fight songs"" for Wake Forest after viewing it done on the Rutgers University artile, and since I'm pretty sure (though not completely) that the songs are ""copyrighted"" since they are about 100 years old. I believe it should be fine. Also, I am trying to create a comprehensive guide about Wake Forest via Wikipedia. I started with putting lots of information so that I could eventually connect it via an informaiton directory templete (as I am doing right now, as you can see, the Wake Forest article has been decreasing in size as I redirect subtopics). If the songs are 100 years old, then yes, they're public domain, but song lyrics do not constitute valid articles (that's what Wikisource is for), and you better be completely sure, not just make a guess. With all due respect, I really think you don't know what you're doing at all, judging from your confusion above about what ""copyrighted"" means, and from the 50+ images you spammed Wikisource with without any authorship attribution, immediately after your block for doing the same thing had ended. You're working far too fast before you really understand what this site is about and what our article standards are. And please respond to my comments where I leave them, on your own talk page, rather than jumping back and forth between mine and yours. "
0non
704fbcd84e53a9ef
Yeah Yeah my bad . Im sorry it looks a lot better I think I got confused this page with another . either way sorry about that .
0non
395c430ae9c30432
Syria does not recognize the State Palestine, because Syria considers (unofficially) the claimed territory of Palestine to be an integral part of Geater Syria.
0non
3b8007cc0a5e9796
New Zealanders are a pack of cunts. They need to get a mention.
1tox
3fefa51ef811b47f
It is pronounced the British way (Cray-ig). The American way is wrong
0non
af44052a96dd976d
I suppose I should nip across the Crescent, when I get some time, and see what they've got on Salford Docks in the local history library. I'll try and do that sometime this week.
0non
c8806a02e7db6c01
Can every cook govern the state? Vladimir Lenin believed it could. Apparently, some Wikipedia administrators would also love to. If not a real state, then, at least, the terra incognita of Earthquake engineering. Thus, the intermediate administrator who, according to his background, is not legally allowed, in any form, to practice Earthquake engineering, never-the-less, keeps vigorously imposing his unprofessional judgments by mercilessly cutting the Wikipedia article on Earthquake engineering without any open discussion (6 cases of his editorial assault for 1 hour 17 minutes of 6 February 2009 only!). Will anybody cut him short, please? 69.108.101.89
0non
ebbec1519106c4ea
" Jack Nicholson and Prince Charles In 1989 when Doctor Who was going off the air, Steve Martin went on an Australian variety show called ""Hey! Hey! It's Saturday"" and sung a song like Adam Sandler's Hannukah song, only with celebrity Whovians instead of celebrity Jews. Two of those names he listed was Prince Charles and Jack Nicholson."
0non
92c8c755f0205d62
Help please! Hullo Amy, if you have the time could you have a quick look at my user page and tell me why I cannot get my name to up in a pretty box like your does? I have copied your and amended but it still doesn't seem to work. Thanks, Geoff.
0non
38987986f591cd18
Please stop. Removing the AfD (Article for Deletion) tag from an article before the end of the deletion process, as you did to Sashinka Teshxiera, is considered vandalism, and if you continue you might be blocked. It won't stop the deletion process anyway.
0non
d4e58522e59af7c7
Appears to be validated by this and this.
0non
558b4af7bf5e70bd
Corrupted archive links It appears that most of the archive links are faulty. I don't know what has happened, although I have a vague suspicion. In any case, there's a considerable job needing to be done to correct this. I'll see how much of it I can manage. __
0non
a8ef72dce7dd9c08
List of sporting comebacks Hehe. Sorry. ) ?!?
0non
1aa9a5903d129bc2
" I reverted your bold edit. I am not passing judgment on the actual edit, but on the principle that it is inappropriate to change an MOS to suit an active debate. Changes to the MOS should generally be discussed, but even more so when a debate on one page affects multiple pages going forward. (Contact me) "
0non
7aa203339382c442
Political Photo Bias Why do all of the photos of Obama with another politician have him with Republicans exclusively. This is a very political minded tactic and just another addition that makes this page more of a campaign page then actual encyclopedic entry. We have to take steps to stop the Obama Admin from literally running this page. Anything less is negligence. Thank you. JohnHistory
0non
29ec7cbe0b747f46
" I imagine the reluctance to use the translation comes from the fascistic tone of the English translation, a feeling which is completely absent in Welsh. ""Order of Hope of Wales"" is literally correct, but never used. "
0non
530c6f228202ea85
" Viriditas. You may be a full 6-pack, but you're missing the plastic bit that holds them all together. Kiss "
0non
9659e31190383d8b
Fuck you PENIS PENIS PENIS JACKO WACKO JACKO WACKO JACKO WACKO
1tox
2cb9dd45072fcdac
Request Please don't involve yourself in the affairs of others. I can't speak for slakr, but personally, I don't need your assistance at this time. Thanks.
0non
c32f46164290df6b
" ""We"", it seems like just you as everyone has no issue with this verification process. You seem to be the only holding issue here as no one else is saying anything. Purevolume is a good enough of a source for all others, why not you?"
0non
43dca95b74650790
" Kitzinger Regards reference 46, Framing abuse by Kitzinger, I got the book out of the library yesterday. In the index, and on a brief flip through there is no mention of satan, satanic abuse, ritual abuse, the United States, religion, religious leaders, the satanic panic, courts, judicial systems, guilt, or anything else that really supports the sentence ""In America and Britain journalists framed the charges against the defendants as evidence of a moral panic and mass hysteria; child protection workers and social workers involved were bound by their professional codes of confidentiality and unable to comment on the specifics of the cases"" There is focus on two cases - Cleveland and Orkney, both in the UK. Based on my reading, the main focus of the book is on how the media's portrayal of the cases affected the public's perception of the event years later - not on guilt or innocence (though there is discussion on how the media left out and selectively reported details that were more convincing of the guilt of the parents. If anyone on this talk page has read the book or is responsible for placing the text on the page, could you refer me to the page number (and chapter in case we have different versions) so I can verify? Right now I'm tempted to excise the statement for having a) nothing to do with the U.S. b) nothing to do with the outcome of court cases and c) nothing to do with satanic ritual abuse. If nothing else, it would allow the most nuanced, hopefully most neutral, portrayal of the book's contents. Kitzinger appears to be very carefully saying nothing about the suspects' guilt or innocence, but I admit it is a cursory flip-through. Got some other scholarly books from the same section in the library, some of which discuss SRA specifically, hopefully I'll find time to read them. "
0non
1aa7f91f98334a74
WWE Network A wrestling site is not a good source
0non
90ef35c103d8790b
my source is a track map that i downloaded that refers to the platform as boland's landing, and when a m7 set is making a scheduled stop there, the computer will announce boland's landing.
0non
aa9cb1bd8b149619
Your a twat! What happened to the george walker page motherfudger!!!!!
1tox
3bc181caddfd3c7c
MfD nomination of User:Nir.bd . Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nir.bd and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of (t • c)
0non
edcf20a4b2e7aeef
" laissez-faire Capitalism Ideal laissez-faire capitalism is not responsible for ""the obscenely vast gap between richest and poorest"". Get your facts right, socialist."
0non
87a2c6804a139f02
succession boxes I really wish you wouldn't remove succession boxes, which I notice you've done for various Delaware politicians. They are highly useful for navigating, and, I think, are certainly no more space consuming than the large tables you've been creating. (They also contain more information, in that they give predecessors and successors, where the tables you've created do not).
0non
04316270ff7b76c8
" Revision I feel that the version http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Serbs_of_Croatia&diff;=198582584&oldid;=198570352 is a much better version than the current. Do people have any objections? Please take a look at the 7 points under ""Outside comments"" section. Are there any ideas or problems that you may have with the revert? I'm asking if there are any objections because i intend on reverting the article to that version."
0non
51349435f3d91188
Thanks, and sorry for the trouble.
0non
cd9846ea047e3ed6
Don't react with such hostility. This article was very poorly written, particularly for a player of this caliber.-
0non
9c93ae8924e24367
Bones in the human body How many bones in the human body? There's a discussion on this subject at Talk:200 (number), also involving movies.
0non
2c8aba417dad41a5
Oh, OK. Is the term '12th man' only informal?
0non
c35b41e2e4efce9b
Thanks! Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =)
0non
4f4494c93bace7a1
" This is part of the Ron Paul interview with Glenn Beck. BECK: OK. Dr. Paul, I`m going to take a break. And in the break, I`m going to feed something down to your location that I`m not going to show on the air. My life has been threatened. I`ve had to wear a vest and have securities. I`ve had an S.W.A.T. team watch my family because of people who say they support you. I want to show you something that is out on the Internet about me and from people that say they support you. And I want to get your thoughts on this, and let`s set to rest some things when we come back. Shall we? (COMMERCIAL BREAK) BECK: We`re back with Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, who is joining us tonight for a full hour. I want to make this very clear. I believe that Ron Paul, in general, the group of supporters, some of whom I`ve met while I was on the road, are amazing people. Without any help from the official campaign, Ron Paul supporters have coined the term ""The Ron Paul Revolution."" They developed the concept for the Guy Fawkes Day money bomb back on November 5th which raised over $4 million. They hired a blimp to fly over New Hampshire to promote the Ron Paul campaign. Last Sunday, they held a tea party, where they broke John Kerry`s single day primary fundraising record by collecting another $6 million. But the downside is, when you have rabid supporters, some of them believe they can speak to their own agendas using the candidate`s name. And I just in the break showed Dr. Paul just a clip, a very small part of a five- minute video that is on the Internet where I am named a traitor and traitors should be executed. Can you would you like to address that at all, sir? -So YES, Newsroom hierarchies I'd say that my quotes about the Revolution being violen are valid. And yes You feel you can just do anything with section You want. With out coming to a Consensus, so STOP... Untill others voice their thoughts.mps_comb MFA "
0non
e051b957b990bb9f
this guy nailed it on the head! Paralympiakos quit deleting things people alreaddy know! as in ufc undisputed roster. people wnat to know who will be in the game. then when someone tries and confront you as being a bad moderator Paralympiakos deletes or just plain out makes fun of. then tries to ban people when they do the same thing. people have done this in history as well trying to silence people when they did not go the way of the person in charge.... hitler is one. this will most likely be deleted because he can not make fun of me for this and it is the truth and since Paralympiakos knows he is a horrible moderator. get off of your power trip Paralympiakos, if not then go fix the ea mma wikipedia page since they have unconfirmed fighters too. here is a lonk since you don't seem to know what it is. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EA_Sports_MMA
0non
fd51690cbf02be11
How is asking for CORRECT REFERENCES disrupting a page? Do you support bad history?
0non
d7367a5d6ebd043d
Wikipedia should be named Wikifagia because they all suck balls.
1tox
9de7e92489d7316a
Collaboration Hi Jayant. Let me unconfuse you about the whole collaboration thingy. It basically works like the Article Improvement Drive, where people vote for an article they really really want edited. You can still edit other articles, & you don't even have to edit the article nominated, but it just helps focus the group's attention at improving a single article. So continue editing as you were, & feel free to vote or edit the nominated article. Thanks,
0non
54c6c9cf53aab4f6
Hey, welcome to my user talk page, if you would like to talk to me or make a new friend don't hesitate to leave a comment. If you are an administrator i'd appreciate being unblocked, being unable to contribute constructivley to Wikipedia for over a month has taught me a lesson. i have been so desperate that i even joined Uncyclopedia.
0non
183d7ae8f2a653dd
" Xenophobia Sorry, the inclusion of ""irrational"" is critical when describing any phobia. If you suggest that it is not irrational, then it's not a phobia. Without the inclusion of the word irrational in this article, it is innaccurate and lacks NPOV; simple as that. Promsan"
0non
f7ecee3dd8cf12fd
SPAM you've been spammed, idiot.
1tox
efb268c1cca6604a
Episode Summaries Why are their already episodes summaries? Every TV article I've been on, it's always been no summaries until it's aired. After all, you can't summarize something you haven't seen, and more often then not, a summary before airing is copy-paste. 220.245.146.235
0non
863cc05d97c80f86
Can someone further the information of the 'baggies' at the bottom of this article? This is a worldwide, well-known type of 'baggie' but I feel the sentence can be furthered in quality. Furthermore I cannot find a Wikipedia page to match them, despite them being universally recognized. —
0non
67a1bcadb6535550
What is the resistivity of graphite?
0non
eff060be8f70c140
Template:Ireland-bio-stub Hi RedHotHeat, I've reverted your edits to the Irish bio template. The reason is that this template is used for people from Ireland, both before and after partition, in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. For this reason the flag of the Republic of Ireland is not suitable. Hope you understand. « '''''' t/e»
0non
3139f46d936e7676
":::::: Now, would you please let me know how can someone ""dispute the relevance or accuracy of a section, then, by definition, it is controversial and disputed."" I remember when Pecher wanted to remove the disputed tags, he asked us to find a reliable source proving that the article is disputed. As much as I rememeber, you agreed with him that Jewish Encyclopedia is not enough to prove that the article is disputed. All of the editors working on this article except Pecher believe we can use JE ""usless contradicted by modern peer reviewed journal"". Would you please let us know how can one dispute the material from JE. Thanks. I also agree with you that it's best to use modern sources. If any of us finds one such source and observes that there is a contradiction, it will establish that Jewish Encyclopedia (JE) is outdated. Still, it is hard for me to believe that JE gets greatly outdated on something that has happened many centuries before. "
0non
bdbdc4e81c703119
Current users Contrary to what the article says, several current models use body-on-frame. We should list them.
0non
3709ce8a1deaa0f9
You smell like doo doo! You stink!
1tox
f507d27df6110cad
Wow that was lame, I never made any personal attacks. It's really stupid of you to make insinuating comments about false comments. I don't know where power-hungry egotists like you get off.
1tox
9a5d83d0ff0986e9
" NWA Wisconsin I was told you deleted this article, I was just interested in what it looked like before it was deleted. Regards Before I deleted it, it had been blanked; the content before the blanking was: This is name of person If you are reading this you probably already know I will take over the universe (with the name of someone in the place where I put ""name of person"" above). Prior to that, there was another article with the same title, which was deleted by someone else (under WP:PROD, with the reason ""Non notable wrestling promotion, no third party sources, fails WP:CORP""); that one was a real article. If you want to take a look, I can temporarily undelete it (or you could request at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Content review). "
0non
3a7a6f9625205733
How is this nonsense? This is all verifiable and true and is a major incident in Brasil. Please also see the Bus 174 article thank you.
0non
369c28bebb748931
" Could you guys just come with me and talk with Nicky944? Gu (contribs) "
0non
17d2a1d2147f897f
you are queer as volk you are gay man. oh no the wikipedia police are coming to get me!!!!!!you are the only gay in the village
1tox
17e371b752b77651
Thanks for the reply. I've noticed that the TIP never acknowledges the deaths of their emir. They quietly promoted Abdullah Mansour to emir after Abdul Shakoor al-Turkistani was killed in a drone strike and now act as if the latter never existed. Very strange. 96.59.223.143
0non
26577ee1d7597ff5
Updating obsolete fields of company infoboxes Hi, Plastikpork. There is a discussion (well, not really discussion as during two weeks there was no feedback) about updating obsolete fields of company infoboxes. I remember you assisted with this when updating power station infoboxes. Do you think is it possible that you could assist also with this infobox?
0non
0ce7cef9a8b03762
" If the nav box doesn't point to an article, it should not be in that article. TableMannersC··T "
0non
10a1d8a73bf4e63b
I'm changing this entry from a List of Thracian tribes to more like an article about Thracian tribes, which will mention/list pretty much all tribes.
0non
21dbeaee2324f019
" It says at the top: ""Unsourced or poorly sourced negative material about living persons should not be posted to articles or talk pages. If you find any, please remove it immediately"" "
0non
d11468a914355ca9
(UTC) Not necessarily. I believe SD 2.0 has tighter electrical specifications than SD 1.x (such as lower voltage tolerances and higher current tolerances) so a SD 1.x device may, but would not necessarily, qualify as an SD 2.0 device. It would need to be meet the electrical specs of SD 2.0 before it could be able to offically support SDHC and carry the SDHC logo. It is possible that some SD 1.x devices will already meet this spec just because they were designed well from the start, but they would need to be tested to ensure they meet the SD 2.0 electrical spec and also have a firmware upgrade. 136.186.1.185 04:08, 1 July 2008
0non
39c7a451acb48bd8
He's written a lot of Star Wars comics, none of which are listed here. Anyone?
0non
51415c9ad3994a04
" The plural of ""theories"" is what abounds, not adherents that are credible sources for each of those theories. The people that believe are Barbara Olson was abducted by aliens is incredibly small and irrelevant. The internet is abound with hundreds of whacky theories but none have depth.."
0non
c957cd72ae0359c9
Yeah fine http://www.agilitynut.com/eateries/mcd.html Eat it, nerdlinger. This article is pure crap.
0non
6f7eb929ba87d15b
The NY Yorker article implies more than a clarification of Perlman's work by Cao and Zhu; it documents an apparent attempt by mentor Yau to defraud Perelman of the credit for this achievement of solving the Poincare conjecture by back engineering work done by Cao & Zhu, directed by Yau. Quite unethical, can China police these fraud attempts ?
0non
d94ce6cf59f1ea79
big network if you'll permanently block us from wikipedia alot of kids at this school will be unable to edit to fix wikipedia. these are school computers, not an individual person vandalizing.
0non
300b0c81ea94e02d
Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chicken rice=)Hey guys I love chic
0non
d4e23c86f5b1d708
JEW FUCKING POWER!!!!!!! FOR ALLAH!!!!! *BOOM*
1tox
7c3d83f8dc4e8a1a
" Ratel, you've come into this debate later than most so you may have missed the admin warning about uncivil remarks - ie, users will be blocked. Indeed, I know of one editor here who was subsequently warned personally. Many who may have been uncivil have since made an excellent effort to raise the standard here. Would be nice to keep it that way. ""...take it up with the management, bub..."" in my opinion is not particularly civil nor does it foster a spirit of collaboration, rather the opposite. thanks "
0non
fb9cd9425a08f4ac
1. The IPA handbook is a work of phonetics, not phonology. 2. Yes, that is a serious proposal for palatalized vowelspublished by a serious linguist, whom I assuming doesn't use the moniker kwamigami at wiki. 3. You seem to have a very limited inflexible approach to this topic, which is unfortunate. Why can't you compass the idea of expanded discussion and alternative accounts (which might not agree with how to describe Japanese phonology)? And you wonder why so many people have given up on trying to improve linguistics pages at wiki?133.7.7.240
0non
6f8f55e765de2436
" ''Addendum:6) I believe the original complaint that I am guilty of ""Replacing the goading comment after three independent editors expressed disapproval"" is incorrect, I only replaced the comment after one editor, RP, expressed disapproval. The comment was later replaced by another editor, who RP apparently mistook for me. Here is my last restore: .Again, I would like to request a review by an independent Admin, certainly not by the blocking Admin or any other involved in the Ref Desk guidelines dispute. "
0non
5a66f52de129b9cc
Bollinger edit Q Agne, I'd like to open a discussion about improving the lead for the Wiki Bollinger page. You removed some of the detail from the lead quite a while ago. []. I think some of the detail should be added back, in the interest of having the most useful article. I'll open the discussion on the Bollinger discussion page.
0non
2a1aac9c616915af
I also just want to point something else out... I deleted the unreliable material almost a month ago (see above discussion). At the time there was one other editor who commented on my changes. It was his suggestion that this article was ready for a new AFD. However, I wanted to give others a chance to comment. No one did. But as soon as I posted the AFD... suddenly there is activity here. I find that strange.
0non
748a6a044b829232
" Sorry, Jalapeno, but what you say is incorrect. WP:SYNTH clearly states: Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. Editors should not make the mistake of thinking that if A is published by a reliable source, and B is published by a reliable source, then A and B can be joined together in an article to reach conclusion C. This would be a synthesis of published material that advances a new position, and that constitutes original research.[7] ""A and B, therefore C"" is acceptable only if a reliable source has published the same argument in relation to the topic of the article. Surely this applies to tables of data that are combined from multiple sources to advance an argument, as this one was. "
0non
d5890185392ee75b
" NPOV editing I'm sorry i was about to put in this entry on the talk page: By the grace of G-d Greetings and blessings. I have edited the links section to add few Mashichist sites to give a greater range of Chabad views on the issue of identity of Moshiach and the proccess of redemption. While I realize Wikipedia is not a link list I feel that all those sites should be included. I have also moved the ""Breif history of Chabad Messianism"" to the historical sites section from it's original location in the Chabad Messianic sites section since it's not a Mashichist propaganda, but the author of the article simply presents an overview of the development of the Moshiach identification campaign within Chabad and further states elsewhere on his site that he doesn't believe the Rebbe is Moshiach therefore it obviously doesn't belong in the Chabad Messianic sites section. I have also added the http://www.YudelKrinsky.com as satire is just another way to convey information and studying it creates a clearer picture about the issue in the mind of a serious Wikipedia reader. With respect and blessing. PS.Please see my talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ariel_Sokolovsky for copies of the emails between me and Eliezer to understand why he is so determined to keep these links deleted."
0non
ad998e72b81376aa
I also not see clear data that this town rebels-held or that clashes inside him. Probably they was put to rebels-held on based the erroneous data.
0non
46970e2849faa361
" on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: User Pages The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style My FAQ Page Glossary What wikipedia is not Requested Articles Reference Desk Assume good faith Sandbox (This page is for testing) I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or an experienced wikipedian like and and leave your message on our talk page. Again, welcome! If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section''' of | My Talk Page Once you've become an experienced Wikipedian, please take your time to visit this page: WikiProjects _Anonymous |} Category:User-specific Welcome templates"
0non
034414855570207a
" Access denied! Does anyone know if dot.tk denies access to any browsers or operating systems? Cuz I cant go to the site running Mozilla 1.3.1 on Windows 98, it just says ""The connection was refused when attempting to connect to www.dot.tk"". "
0non
a8b8cd3aeb4b5c7a
" Just to be clear that you are stating that the theory of evolution by natural selection as formulated by Charles Darwin is ""not really about evolution at all""? That is the topic sentence of the third paragraph and so I want to make certain that I understand your assertion. If I understand you correctly, then I have to say that I disagree with your assertion that Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by means of natural selection has is not about evolution. I think you will have a tough go with that argument. "
0non
893f3c7aad05b2c3
Admin killed research material. Lost taste. frack this, you can have all your delusions about bold editing. there be tyrants around.
1tox
675b56cea34a8c5d
Opps Sry Placed the Speedy too soon
0non
080461bc792e4b5e
You are clearly violating Wikipedia policy by asking for personal info. It doesn't matter what my name IS HERE or THERE or ANYWHERE! Ian stated Wikipedia POLICY is that anyone can remain anonymous. It's unreal that you would even ask me for such information! Unreal!
0non
2fd997e0fe099161
" Irrelevant sociologists? ""Philosophers Jonathan Kaplan and Rasmus Winther have argued that while Edwards's argument is correct it does not invalidate Lewontin's original argument, because racial groups being genetically distinct on average does not mean that racial groups are the most basic biological divisions of the world's population. Nor does it mean that races are not social constructs as is the prevailing view among anthropologists and social scientists, because the particular genetic differences that correspond to races only become salient when racial categories take on social importance. From this sociological perspective, Edwards and Lewontin are therefore both correct."" Well, no. Lewontin's claim that Fst invalidates a taxonomy is incorrect, even from a culinary science perspective. Do we need this garbage in the article? 27.1.214.45 "
0non
7f03253291826b31
<>If there are some references to contradict the currently available set, then we can have a discussion on neutrality. Meantime, there are references one way only so a discussion on neutrality is only needed when Wiki-Ed reveals himself to have been hiding a bunch of sources.
0non
fe52065c5277a42f
" Hello RR. I think the link to the Railway Performance Society should be included for a few reasons. Readers can see what the society is about and whether they think its references and research are worthy. Furthermore, to be frank, the RPS generally at least wants some publicity for using ""their"" sources and data, which, to be frank, I think is fair enough, it`s not as if they`re a business in it to make money. If you want to move the link to the reference at the bottom of the page be my guest. I think this is a classic case where an inflexible attitude to Wikipedia`s ""rules"" is counter productive. As I say on my ""User page, we shouldn`t lose sight of why we`re actually here. On the Cecil J Allen book, it is actually a book which I have in my collection, the full title is ""Locomotive practice & Performance in the 20th Century"", first published by Heffer in 1949. On the reference thing, my eyes just glaze over when I see that, my brain is already full.... Just as I sometimes edit others grammatical errors, I`m quite happy for others to edit my references if they want ! Incidentally, is there a spelling checker on the Wikipedia software because the one on my Google toolbar doesn`t seem to work on Wiki editing for some reason. "
0non
6e551d4187f9c7ca
why you edited sergio rico national team he has been callen for spain and u removed are u bilnd do u ever watch news
0non
c6ac101762b06ecf
Sorry, misread the sentence, I'm going to bed.
0non
63387cbf516b7b1e
" Oh yes you're right, I've been out of school for a while so I'm a little rusty. I can't believe I made such a bad error in the process of correcting an ""error."" Le sigh. 05:37, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)"
0non