Datasets:

PatronusAI

/

drop-test-200-samples

like 0

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich team scored the longest field goal kick of the game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to rebound from the road loss to the Chargers, the Rams went home for Week 9, as they fought the Kansas City Chiefs in a \"Show Me State Showdown\". The Chiefs struck first as RB Larry Johnson got a 1-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, things got worse for the Rams as QB Damon Huard completed a 3-yard TD pass to TE Tony Gonzalez, while kicker Lawrence Tynes nailed a 42-yard field goal. St. Louis got on the board with RB Steven Jackson getting a 2-yard TD run, yet Huard and Gonzalez hooked up with each other again on a 25-yard TD strike. Rams kicker Jeff Wilkins made a 41-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter, QB Marc Bulger completed a 2-yard TD pass to WR Kevin Curtis for the only score of the period, yet the only score of the fourth quarter came from Huard completing an 11-yard TD pass to TE Kris Wilson. With the loss, the Rams fell to 4-4.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Rams', 'second', 'Marc Bulger', 'Kevin Curtis']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks specifically about the longest field goal kick of the game, not about general game events or players involved in other types of scoring.', \"The answer provided lists 'Rams', 'second', 'Marc Bulger', 'Kevin Curtis', none of which directly address the longest field goal kick. 'Rams' and 'second' are too vague without context, and 'Marc Bulger' and 'Kevin Curtis' are associated with a touchdown pass, not a field goal.\", 'The context clearly states that the longest field goal was 42 yards by Lawrence Tynes of the Chiefs, which directly answers the question.', 'The answer should have focused on the specific details of the longest field goal rather than listing unrelated game elements and players.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many percent were not Irish?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n87.1\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the percentage of the population that were not Irish.', 'The context provides that 13.1% of the population were of Irish ancestry.', 'To find the percentage of the population that were not Irish, one would subtract the percentage of Irish (13.1%) from 100%.', '100% - 13.1% = 86.9%.', 'The answer provided is 87.1%, which does not match the calculated value of 86.9%.', 'Therefore, the answer is not faithful to the context because it slightly overestimates the percentage of non-Irish people by 0.2%.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many yards was the second longest field goal of the first half?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to rebound from the road loss to the Chargers, the Rams went home for Week 9, as they fought the Kansas City Chiefs in a \"Show Me State Showdown\". The Chiefs struck first as RB Larry Johnson got a 1-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, things got worse for the Rams as QB Damon Huard completed a 3-yard TD pass to TE Tony Gonzalez, while kicker Lawrence Tynes nailed a 42-yard field goal. St. Louis got on the board with RB Steven Jackson getting a 2-yard TD run, yet Huard and Gonzalez hooked up with each other again on a 25-yard TD strike. Rams kicker Jeff Wilkins made a 41-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter, QB Marc Bulger completed a 2-yard TD pass to WR Kevin Curtis for the only score of the period, yet the only score of the fourth quarter came from Huard completing an 11-yard TD pass to TE Kris Wilson. With the loss, the Rams fell to 4-4.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n42\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question specifically asks for the second longest field goal of the first half.', 'The context mentions two field goals in the first half: one by Lawrence Tynes for 42 yards and another by Jeff Wilkins for 41 yards.', 'The 42-yard field goal by Lawrence Tynes is the longest field goal of the first half.', 'The 41-yard field goal by Jeff Wilkins is the second longest field goal of the first half.', 'Therefore, the correct answer to the question should be 41, not 42.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow long was the last touchdown?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to rebound from their tough overtime road loss to the Raiders, the Jets went home for a Week 8 duel with the Kansas City Chiefs. In the first quarter, New York took flight as QB Brett Favre completed an 18-yard TD pass to RB Leon Washington. In the second quarter, the Chiefs tied the game as QB Tyler Thigpen completed a 19-yard TD pass to TE Tony Gonzalez. The Jets would answer with Washington getting a 60-yard TD run. Kansas City closed out the half as Thigpen completed an 11-yard TD pass to WR Mark Bradley. In the third quarter, the Chiefs took the lead as kicker Connor Barth nailed a 30-yard field goal, yet New York replied with RB Thomas Jones getting a 1-yard TD run. In the fourth quarter, Kansas City got the lead again as CB Brandon Flowers returned an interception 91 yards for a touchdown. Fortunately, the Jets pulled out the win with Favre completing the game-winning 15-yard TD pass to WR Laveranues Coles. During halftime, the Jets celebrated the 40th anniversary of their Super Bowl III championship team.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n18-yard\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question specifically asks for the length of the 'last touchdown' in the described game.\", 'The context provides details of multiple touchdowns scored during the game, including the distances of each.', 'The last touchdown mentioned in the context is a 15-yard TD pass from Brett Favre to WR Laveranues Coles.', \"The answer provided, '18-yard', refers to the first touchdown of the game, which was an 18-yard TD pass from Brett Favre to RB Leon Washington.\", \"Therefore, the answer '18-yard' is incorrect as it does not correspond to the last touchdown of the game, which was 15 yards.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many in percent from the census weren't Irish?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n87.1\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT provides the percentage of people of Irish descent, which is 13.1%.', 'To find the percentage of people who were not Irish, we subtract the percentage of Irish people from 100%.', '100% - 13.1% = 86.9%.', 'The ANSWER provided is 87.1%, which is not the correct calculation based on the given data.', 'The correct answer should be 86.9%, indicating a slight error in the ANSWER provided.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many more men were registered in 1918 than 1917?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nIn the United States, conscription began in 1917 and was generally well received, with a few pockets of opposition in isolated rural areas. The administration decided to rely primarily on conscription, rather than voluntary enlistment, to raise military manpower for when only 73,000 volunteers enlisted out of the initial 1 million target in the first six weeks of the war. In 1917 10 million men were registered. This was deemed to be inadequate, so age ranges were increased and exemptions reduced, and so by the end of 1918 this increased to 24 million men that were registered with nearly 3 million inducted into the military services. The draft was universal and included blacks on the same terms as whites, although they served in different units. In all 367,710 black Americans were drafted , compared to 2,442,586 white . Forms of resistance ranged from peaceful protest to violent demonstrations and from humble letter-writing campaigns asking for mercy to radical newspapers demanding reform. The most common tactics were dodging and desertion, and many communities sheltered and defended their draft dodgers as political heroes. Many socialists were jailed for \"obstructing the recruitment or enlistment service\". The most famous was Eugene Debs, head of the Socialist Party of America, who ran for president in 1920 from his prison cell. In 1917 a number of radicals and anarchists challenged the new draft law in federal court, arguing that it was a direct violation of the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition against slavery and involuntary servitude. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the constitutionality of the draft act in the Selective Draft Law Cases on January 7, 1918.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n15000000\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT states that in 1917, 10 million men were registered.', 'It also states that by the end of 1918, this number increased to 24 million men.', 'To find the increase in the number of men registered from 1917 to 1918, subtract the number registered in 1917 from the number registered in 1918: 24 million - 10 million = 14 million.', 'The ANSWER provided is 15 million, which is incorrect.', 'The correct difference should be 14 million, not 15 million.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many yards were the two shortest touchdowns of the first half?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to rebound from the road loss to the Chargers, the Rams went home for Week 9, as they fought the Kansas City Chiefs in a \"Show Me State Showdown\". The Chiefs struck first as RB Larry Johnson got a 1-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, things got worse for the Rams as QB Damon Huard completed a 3-yard TD pass to TE Tony Gonzalez, while kicker Lawrence Tynes nailed a 42-yard field goal. St. Louis got on the board with RB Steven Jackson getting a 2-yard TD run, yet Huard and Gonzalez hooked up with each other again on a 25-yard TD strike. Rams kicker Jeff Wilkins made a 41-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter, QB Marc Bulger completed a 2-yard TD pass to WR Kevin Curtis for the only score of the period, yet the only score of the fourth quarter came from Huard completing an 11-yard TD pass to TE Kris Wilson. With the loss, the Rams fell to 4-4.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['2', '3']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question specifically asks for the two shortest touchdowns of the first half.', 'From the context, the touchdowns in the first half were: 1-yard run by Larry Johnson, 3-yard pass to Tony Gonzalez, 2-yard run by Steven Jackson, and a 25-yard pass to Tony Gonzalez.', 'The two shortest touchdowns in the first half were the 1-yard run by Larry Johnson and the 2-yard run by Steven Jackson.', \"The answer provided lists '2' and '3', which incorrectly includes the 3-yard pass to Tony Gonzalez and omits the 1-yard run by Larry Johnson.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many more households are there than families?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n19300\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT provides the number of households as 79,667 and the number of families as 60,387.', 'To find how many more households there are than families, subtract the number of families from the number of households: 79,667 - 60,387 = 19,280.', 'The ANSWER provided is 19,300, which does not match the correct calculation of 19,280.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is incorrect because it does not accurately reflect the difference calculated from the numbers given in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many more households are there than families?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n19300\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT provides the number of households as 79,667 and the number of families as 60,387.', 'To find how many more households there are than families, subtract the number of families from the number of households: 79,667 - 60,387 = 19,280.', 'The ANSWER provided is 19,300, which does not match the correct calculation of 19,280.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is incorrect because it does not accurately reflect the difference calculated from the numbers given in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many years after their defeat in Brazil did the Dutch return?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nSurprised by such easy gains in the East, the Republic quickly decided to exploit Portugal's weakness in the Americas. In 1621 the Geoctroyeerde Westindische Compagnie was created to take control of the sugar trade and colonise America . The Company benefited from a large investment in capital, drawing on the enthusiasm of the best financiers and capitalists of the Republic, such as Isaac de Pinto, by origin a Portuguese Jew. The Dutch West India Company would not, however, be as successful as its eastern counterpart. The Dutch invasion began in 1624 with the conquest of the then capital of the State of Brazil, the city of São Salvador da Bahia, but the Dutch conquest was short lived. In 1625, a joint Spanish-Portuguese fleet of 52 ships and 12,000 men rapidly recaptured Salvador. In 1630 the Dutch returned, and captured Olinda and then Recife, renamed Mauritsstadt, thus establishing the colony of New Holland. The Portuguese commander Matias de Albuquerque retreated his forces inland, to establish a camp dubbed Arraial do Bom Jesus. Until 1635, the Dutch were unable to harvest sugar due to Portuguese guerrilla attacks, and were virtually confined to the walled perimeter of the cities. Eventually, the Dutch evicted the Portuguese with the assistance of a local landlord named Domingos Fernandes Calabar, but on his retreat to Bahia, Matias de Albuquerque captured Calabar at Porto Calvo, and had him hang for treason. The Portuguese fought back two Dutch attacks on Bahia in 1638. Nonenetheless, by 1641 the Dutch captured São Luís, leaving them in control of northwestern Brazil between Maranhão and Sergipe in the south\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n6\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The Dutch first invaded Brazil in 1624 and were defeated in 1625.', 'The Dutch returned to Brazil in 1630, which is 5 years after their defeat in 1625.', \"The answer provided, '6', does not match the correct duration of 5 years between the Dutch defeat in 1625 and their return in 1630.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many yards Hanson score with in the first?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nTo start the season, the Lions traveled south to Tampa, Florida to take on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. The Lions scored first in the first quarter with a 23-yard field goal by Jason Hanson. The Buccaneers tied it up with a 38-yard field goal by Connor Barth, then took the lead when Aqib Talib intercepted a pass from Matthew Stafford and ran it in 28 yards. The Lions responded with a 28-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Detroit took the lead with a 36-yard touchdown catch by Calvin Johnson, and later added more points when Tony Scheffler caught an 11-yard TD pass. Tampa Bay responded with a 31-yard field goal just before halftime. The second half was relatively quiet, with each team only scoring one touchdown. First, Detroit's Calvin Johnson caught a 1-yard pass in the third quarter. The game's final points came when Mike Williams of Tampa Bay caught a 5-yard pass. The Lions won their regular season opener for the first time since 2007\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n28\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks specifically about the yards Hanson scored in the first quarter.', 'The context mentions that Jason Hanson scored a 23-yard field goal in the first quarter.', \"The answer provided, 28, does not match the 23 yards mentioned in the context for Hanson's field goal.\", \"The number 28 in the context refers to the yards Aqib Talib ran after intercepting a pass, not to Hanson's performance.\", \"Therefore, the answer '28' is incorrect as it does not accurately reflect the yards Hanson scored, which were 23 yards.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nhow many points did new orleans defeat tampa by?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nDrew Brees threw for 312 yards and two touchdown passes, as New Orleans defeated Tampa Bay 24-17. The Saints jumped out to a 14-0 lead in the second quarter, and led 17-10 at halftime. Tampa Bay made the score 24-17 after Jameis Winston threw a touchdown pass to Adam Humphries with just under 9 minutes left in regulation. Trailing by 7, the Buccaneers got the ball back with 5:22 to go, but went 3-and-out. The Saints were then able to run out the clock to secure the win.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n7\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT states that New Orleans defeated Tampa Bay with a final score of 24-17.', 'The difference between 24 and 17 is 7, indicating that New Orleans won by 7 points.', \"The ANSWER provided is '7', which correctly matches the point difference calculated from the scores mentioned in the CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many points did each team score in the first quarter?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Browns dropped their 13th consecutive season-opening game with a 21-18 loss to the Steelers. The scoring began early in the first quarter when Pittsburgh's Tyler Matakevich blocked a Britton Colquitt punt, knocking the ball into the end zone where it was recovered by Anthony Chickillo for a touchdown. The Browns were able to tie the score by the end of the first quarter, however, as rookie quarterback DeShone Kizer orchestrated a 12-play drive that ended when he scored on a 1-yard touchdown run. The game stayed at 7-7 through most of the second quarter, until the Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger connected with tight end Jesse James on a 4-yard touchdown with 45 seconds left in the first half. The 7-play, 91-yard scoring drive was highlighted by a 50-yard reception by Antonio Brown on a tipped ball. After a Zane Gonzalez field goal brought the Browns within 14-10 early in the third quarter, the Steelers drove down the field again. Roethlisberger threw a second touchdown pass to James to put them up by 11, 21-10. The drive was boosted by a 41-yard pass interference penalty on Browns cornerback Jamar Taylor on a deep pass intended for Brown. The score remained 21-10 until under four minutes remained in the game, when Kizer was able to throw his first career touchdown pass to Corey Coleman. A two-point conversion run by Isaiah Crowell brought the Browns to within a field goal, 21-18. The Browns did not get a chance to score again, however, as the Steelers were able to run out the clock after a long pass from Roethlisberger to Brown. Browns head coach Hue Jackson challenged the ruling; however, the catch call on the field was upheld. The 13th-straight season-opening loss extended an NFL record for the Browns, who also fell to 1-18 in season openers since returning to the league in 1999. The team also lost their 12th straight game against a divisional opponent. The team started 0-1.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n10\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question specifically asks for the number of points each team scored in the first quarter.', 'The context provides detailed information about the scoring in the first quarter: Pittsburgh scored a touchdown (7 points) and Cleveland also scored a touchdown (7 points).', \"The answer provided, '10', does not specify which team it refers to and does not match the score of either team in the first quarter, as both teams scored 7 points each.\", \"The correct answer should have been '7' for each team, indicating that both the Steelers and the Browns scored 7 points in the first quarter.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich group from the census is smaller: German or Irish?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nGerman\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks which group from the census is smaller: German or Irish.', 'The context provides specific percentages for the ancestry of the population: 22.5% were of German ancestry and 13.1% were of Irish ancestry.', 'From the percentages given, the Irish group (13.1%) is smaller than the German group (22.5%).', \"The answer provided is 'German', which incorrectly identifies the German group as the smaller one.\", \"Therefore, the answer should have been 'Irish' to accurately reflect the smaller group according to the census data provided.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many total yards were played in the fourth quarter that resulted in a score?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to rebound from the road loss to the Chargers, the Rams went home for Week 9, as they fought the Kansas City Chiefs in a \"Show Me State Showdown\". The Chiefs struck first as RB Larry Johnson got a 1-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, things got worse for the Rams as QB Damon Huard completed a 3-yard TD pass to TE Tony Gonzalez, while kicker Lawrence Tynes nailed a 42-yard field goal. St. Louis got on the board with RB Steven Jackson getting a 2-yard TD run, yet Huard and Gonzalez hooked up with each other again on a 25-yard TD strike. Rams kicker Jeff Wilkins made a 41-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter, QB Marc Bulger completed a 2-yard TD pass to WR Kevin Curtis for the only score of the period, yet the only score of the fourth quarter came from Huard completing an 11-yard TD pass to TE Kris Wilson. With the loss, the Rams fell to 4-4.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n12\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question specifically asks for the total yards played in the fourth quarter that resulted in a score.', 'The context mentions that the only score in the fourth quarter was from an 11-yard TD pass to TE Kris Wilson.', 'The answer should reflect the total yards from the play that resulted in the score during the fourth quarter, which is 11 yards as per the context.', 'The answer provided is 12, which is incorrect as it does not match the 11 yards mentioned in the context for the fourth quarter scoring play.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich team won the game, Patriots or Packers?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nTrying to rebound from back-to-back home losses, the Patriots traveled to Lambeau Field for a Week 11 showdown with the Green Bay Packers. In the first quarter, Brady hooked up with Graham on a two-yard touchdown pass for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, Dillon got a one-yard touchdown run, while Brady hooked up with Caldwell on a 54-yard touchdown pass. Late in the quarter Packers quarterback Brett Favre was sacked by Tedy Bruschi and was knocked out of the game with injury to his right (throwing) wrist. In the third quarter, Brady threw an eight-yard touchdown pass to Watson for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, New England put the game away with Brady throwing his fourth touchdown pass of the day to Maroney, a 19-yard strike. With the win, the Patriots improved to 7-3.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Packers']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context clearly states that the New England Patriots won the game against the Green Bay Packers.', \"It mentions that 'With the win, the Patriots improved to 7-3,' indicating that the Patriots were the victors in this game.\", \"The answer incorrectly lists the 'Packers' as the winners, which contradicts the information provided in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many touchdowns did Crabtree catch?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Raiders traveled to Baltimore looking to win their third straight road game to open the season for the first time since 2000. The Ravens, undefeated on the season, looked to continue their good start. The Raiders jumped out early, taking a lead on a six-yard touchdown pass to Seth Roberts from Derek Carr. A Baltimore field goal tightened the lead before Carr hit Michael Crabtree for his first of three touchdown scores on the day, and the Raiders took a 14-6 lead to the half as the Raiders defense held the Ravens in check. Baltimore answered in the third quarter, pulling within two on a Joe Flacco one-yard touchdown run. Crabtree again answered for the Raiders on a 13-yard pass from Carr. However, the Raiders defense allowed a 52-yard pass and catch from Flacco to Steve Smith Sr. and the Ravens pulled within two after failing to convert on the two-point conversion. The Raiders lead tightened to 21-19. The Ravens struck again following a fumble by Raiders rookie running back DeAndre Washington and Terrance West scored three-yard touchdown run to take the Ravens first lead of the game 27-21. The Raiders answered, driving down the field before Carr hit Crabtree from 23 yards out. The Raiders took the lead 28-27. As time was running out, the Ravens looked for the game-winning field goal, but the Raiders defense held and the Raiders moved to 3-1 for the first time since 2000. The three-touchdown game marked Crabtree's first career three-touchdown game. Carr finished with four touchdowns on 199 yards passing. The Raiders defense, much maligned on the season, gave up 412 yards, but stopped the Ravens when needed.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n2\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context explicitly states that Michael Crabtree caught three touchdown passes during the game.', \"The context details each of the three touchdowns: the first touchdown described as 'Carr hit Michael Crabtree for his first of three touchdown scores on the day', the second touchdown on a '13-yard pass from Carr', and the third touchdown from '23 yards out'.\", \"The answer provided, '2', does not match the information given in the context, which clearly states that Crabtree caught three touchdowns.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many yards were all Brady's TD passes combined?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nTrying to snap a two-game skid, the Bills flew to Gillette Stadium for a Week 3 divisional fight with the New England Patriots. In the first quarter, QB J. P. Losman was immediately injured on the first offensive play of the game. He would finish the series, but ended up on the bench for the rest of the game. After New England took the lead with kicker Stephen Gostkowski's 24-yard field goal, rookie QB Trent Edwards played the rest of the game for Buffalo. The Bills would get their only score of the game as RB Marshawn Lynch got an 8-yard TD run, and a Rian Lindell extra point put the Bills ahead surprisingly 7-3. However, in the second quarter, the Patriots were able to open up their running game when Bills rookie standout Paul Posluszny was lost due to a broken arm. This left passing lanes open, and for the rest of the game, the Patriots dominated. QB Tom Brady's 8-yard TD pass to TE Benjamin Watson and a 3-yard TD pass to WR Randy Moss made it 17-7 at the half. In the third quarter, New England continued its conquest with Brady's 4-yard TD pass to WR Jabar Gaffney and RB Sammy Morris' 4-yard TD run. In the fourth quarter, the Patriots ended the day with Brady and Moss hooking up with each other again on a 45-yard TD pass.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n60\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context provides details of four touchdown (TD) passes thrown by Tom Brady in the game.', 'The distances of the TD passes are given as 8 yards, 3 yards, 4 yards, and 45 yards.', \"To find the total yards of all Brady's TD passes, we need to sum these distances: 8 + 3 + 4 + 45.\", 'Calculating the sum gives us 8 + 3 + 4 + 45 = 60 yards.', \"The answer provided is 60, which correctly matches the sum of the yards from Brady's TD passes as described in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many total yards were kicked by Olindo Mare?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Seahawks' third game was played at home ground when they played their former division rival, the San Diego Chargers. In the second quarter Seattle took the early lead when kicker Olindo Mare made a 23-yard field goal. Then QB Matt Hasselbeck completed a 9-yard TD pass to TE John Carlson. This was followed in the third quarter by RB Leon Washington returning a kickoff 101 yards to the endzone for a touchdown. The lead was broken down with QB Philip Rivers getting a 3-yard TD pass to WR Malcolm Floyd, followed by Hasselbeck getting sacked by ILB Brandon Siler in the endzone for a safety. Then kicker Nate Kaeding made a 29-yard field goal. The Seahawks increased their lead when Mare made a 23-yard field goal, but the Chargers replied and tied the game when Rivers found TE Antonio Gates on a 12-yard TD pass. (With a successful 2-point conversion as Rivers found WR Legedu Naanee). Before the clock struck zero Seattle took the winning score as RB Leon Washington returned his second kickoff of the game into the endzone running 99 yards for a touchdown. Rivers and the Chargers attempted to make a comeback with less than a minute left, but was picked off by rookie Earl Thomas to seal the win for Seattle.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n46\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context mentions two specific instances where Olindo Mare made field goals.', 'Each of the field goals made by Olindo Mare was from 23 yards out.', 'To find the total yards kicked by Olindo Mare, we add the yards from both field goals: 23 yards + 23 yards = 46 yards.', \"The answer '46' accurately represents the sum of the yards from the two field goals made by Olindo Mare as described in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich player had the longest touchdown play of the first half?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Browns dropped their 13th consecutive season-opening game with a 21-18 loss to the Steelers. The scoring began early in the first quarter when Pittsburgh's Tyler Matakevich blocked a Britton Colquitt punt, knocking the ball into the end zone where it was recovered by Anthony Chickillo for a touchdown. The Browns were able to tie the score by the end of the first quarter, however, as rookie quarterback DeShone Kizer orchestrated a 12-play drive that ended when he scored on a 1-yard touchdown run. The game stayed at 7-7 through most of the second quarter, until the Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger connected with tight end Jesse James on a 4-yard touchdown with 45 seconds left in the first half. The 7-play, 91-yard scoring drive was highlighted by a 50-yard reception by Antonio Brown on a tipped ball. After a Zane Gonzalez field goal brought the Browns within 14-10 early in the third quarter, the Steelers drove down the field again. Roethlisberger threw a second touchdown pass to James to put them up by 11, 21-10. The drive was boosted by a 41-yard pass interference penalty on Browns cornerback Jamar Taylor on a deep pass intended for Brown. The score remained 21-10 until under four minutes remained in the game, when Kizer was able to throw his first career touchdown pass to Corey Coleman. A two-point conversion run by Isaiah Crowell brought the Browns to within a field goal, 21-18. The Browns did not get a chance to score again, however, as the Steelers were able to run out the clock after a long pass from Roethlisberger to Brown. Browns head coach Hue Jackson challenged the ruling; however, the catch call on the field was upheld. The 13th-straight season-opening loss extended an NFL record for the Browns, who also fell to 1-18 in season openers since returning to the league in 1999. The team also lost their 12th straight game against a divisional opponent. The team started 0-1.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Antonio Brown']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question specifically asks for the player who had the longest touchdown play of the first half.', 'The context describes various plays, including touchdowns and significant receptions.', 'Antonio Brown is mentioned in the context for a 50-yard reception on a tipped ball, but this was not a touchdown.', 'The touchdowns mentioned in the first half were by Anthony Chickillo (recovery in the end zone) and Jesse James (4-yard reception).', 'Since Antonio Brown did not score any touchdowns in the first half, naming him as the player with the longest touchdown play is incorrect.', \"The correct answer should identify either Anthony Chickillo or Jesse James, depending on the interpretation of 'longest' in terms of impact or yardage directly involved in the touchdown.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWich team won the game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Raiders traveled to Baltimore looking to win their third straight road game to open the season for the first time since 2000. The Ravens, undefeated on the season, looked to continue their good start. The Raiders jumped out early, taking a lead on a six-yard touchdown pass to Seth Roberts from Derek Carr. A Baltimore field goal tightened the lead before Carr hit Michael Crabtree for his first of three touchdown scores on the day, and the Raiders took a 14-6 lead to the half as the Raiders defense held the Ravens in check. Baltimore answered in the third quarter, pulling within two on a Joe Flacco one-yard touchdown run. Crabtree again answered for the Raiders on a 13-yard pass from Carr. However, the Raiders defense allowed a 52-yard pass and catch from Flacco to Steve Smith Sr. and the Ravens pulled within two after failing to convert on the two-point conversion. The Raiders lead tightened to 21-19. The Ravens struck again following a fumble by Raiders rookie running back DeAndre Washington and Terrance West scored three-yard touchdown run to take the Ravens first lead of the game 27-21. The Raiders answered, driving down the field before Carr hit Crabtree from 23 yards out. The Raiders took the lead 28-27. As time was running out, the Ravens looked for the game-winning field goal, but the Raiders defense held and the Raiders moved to 3-1 for the first time since 2000. The three-touchdown game marked Crabtree's first career three-touchdown game. Carr finished with four touchdowns on 199 yards passing. The Raiders defense, much maligned on the season, gave up 412 yards, but stopped the Ravens when needed.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Ravens']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context describes a detailed account of the game between the Raiders and the Ravens.', 'It mentions that the Raiders took an early lead and maintained it for most of the game, despite strong competition from the Ravens.', 'The context specifically states that the Raiders answered every scoring drive from the Ravens, including a final touchdown pass from Derek Carr to Michael Crabtree to take the lead 28-27.', \"It is mentioned that as time was running out, the Ravens attempted a game-winning field goal, but the Raiders' defense held strong, preventing the Ravens from scoring.\", 'The final part of the context confirms that the Raiders won the game and improved their season record to 3-1.', \"The answer 'Ravens' incorrectly identifies the winning team, as the context clearly indicates that the Raiders won the game.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho had more touchdowns Crabtree or Carr?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Raiders traveled to Baltimore looking to win their third straight road game to open the season for the first time since 2000. The Ravens, undefeated on the season, looked to continue their good start. The Raiders jumped out early, taking a lead on a six-yard touchdown pass to Seth Roberts from Derek Carr. A Baltimore field goal tightened the lead before Carr hit Michael Crabtree for his first of three touchdown scores on the day, and the Raiders took a 14-6 lead to the half as the Raiders defense held the Ravens in check. Baltimore answered in the third quarter, pulling within two on a Joe Flacco one-yard touchdown run. Crabtree again answered for the Raiders on a 13-yard pass from Carr. However, the Raiders defense allowed a 52-yard pass and catch from Flacco to Steve Smith Sr. and the Ravens pulled within two after failing to convert on the two-point conversion. The Raiders lead tightened to 21-19. The Ravens struck again following a fumble by Raiders rookie running back DeAndre Washington and Terrance West scored three-yard touchdown run to take the Ravens first lead of the game 27-21. The Raiders answered, driving down the field before Carr hit Crabtree from 23 yards out. The Raiders took the lead 28-27. As time was running out, the Ravens looked for the game-winning field goal, but the Raiders defense held and the Raiders moved to 3-1 for the first time since 2000. The three-touchdown game marked Crabtree's first career three-touchdown game. Carr finished with four touchdowns on 199 yards passing. The Raiders defense, much maligned on the season, gave up 412 yards, but stopped the Ravens when needed.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Crabtree']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks who had more touchdowns between Crabtree and Carr.', 'The context specifies that Michael Crabtree scored three touchdowns.', 'The context also states that Derek Carr, the quarterback, finished the game with four touchdowns.', 'Given that Carr had four touchdowns and Crabtree had three, Carr had more touchdowns than Crabtree.', \"The answer 'Crabtree' is incorrect because it should be 'Carr' based on the number of touchdowns each scored.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen did Momchil die?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nIn 1344, Momchil, the independent Bulgarian ruler of the Rhodope and Aegean regions, whose army grew to 2,000 men, took an important role in the Byzantine civil war. While at first he supported John Kantakouzenos, from the spring of 1344 Momchil reneged, provoked by the aggression of the Ottoman allies. In June he defeated the Ottoman fleet near the Portogalos bay. According to sources, at night the Bulgarian ruler sent boats to burn the anchored Ottoman ships and soon after he defeated the army of Kantakouzenos at Mosynopolis. Probably the first local ruler to become aware of the impending Ottoman threat, Momchil unsuccessfully pleaded with the emperors of Bulgaria and Byzantium for help. Even though his troops continued the resistance in the Eastern Rhodopes, in May 1345 the Turks led by Umur Beg marched from Asia Minor and devastated Bulgarian territories driving away people and livestock. Soon after, on 7 July 1345, Ottoman forces under Umur Beg defeated Momchil's army in the battle of Peritor near his capital Xanthi. Sources attest that the independent ruler perished in the battle without leaving asuccessor, and with little political will or leadership left to counter the Ottoman invasion.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n5 July 1345\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT clearly states that Momchil died on 7 July 1345, after his army was defeated by Ottoman forces under Umur Beg in the battle of Peritor.', 'The ANSWER incorrectly states that Momchil died on 5 July 1345, which is two days earlier than the date provided in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho kicked the second longest field goal?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to rebound from the road loss to the Chargers, the Rams went home for Week 9, as they fought the Kansas City Chiefs in a \"Show Me State Showdown\". The Chiefs struck first as RB Larry Johnson got a 1-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, things got worse for the Rams as QB Damon Huard completed a 3-yard TD pass to TE Tony Gonzalez, while kicker Lawrence Tynes nailed a 42-yard field goal. St. Louis got on the board with RB Steven Jackson getting a 2-yard TD run, yet Huard and Gonzalez hooked up with each other again on a 25-yard TD strike. Rams kicker Jeff Wilkins made a 41-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter, QB Marc Bulger completed a 2-yard TD pass to WR Kevin Curtis for the only score of the period, yet the only score of the fourth quarter came from Huard completing an 11-yard TD pass to TE Kris Wilson. With the loss, the Rams fell to 4-4.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nLawrence Tynes\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks who kicked the second longest field goal.', 'The context provides information about two field goals: Lawrence Tynes kicked a 42-yard field goal and Jeff Wilkins kicked a 41-yard field goal.', \"Comparing the lengths, Lawrence Tynes' 42-yard field goal is longer than Jeff Wilkins' 41-yard field goal.\", 'Since Lawrence Tynes kicked the longest field goal (42 yards), Jeff Wilkins, who kicked the 41-yard field goal, should be the answer to the question as he kicked the second longest field goal.', \"The answer 'Lawrence Tynes' is incorrect because he kicked the longest, not the second longest field goal.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many percent were not American?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n92.1\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The CONTEXT provides the percentage of the population identifying as 'American' in terms of ancestry, which is 8.1%.\", 'The QUESTION asks for the percentage of people who were not American.', \"To find the percentage of people who were not American, one would subtract the percentage of people identifying as 'American' from 100%.\", 'Calculation: 100% - 8.1% = 91.9%.', 'The ANSWER provided is 92.1%, which does not match the calculated value of 91.9%.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it slightly overestimates the percentage of people who were not American.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many fumbles did the game have in total?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nSan Francisco kept Detroit in the game with missed opportunities, then made just enough plays for a rare two-game winning streak and its first road win. RB Frank Gore set a franchise record with 148 yards rushing in the first half and scored on a 61-yard run before leaving with a concussion. San Francisco led 13-3 at halftime after scoring on three of its first four drives, wishing it had a bigger lead after out gaining Detroit 247-102 yards and recovering a fumble without giving up a turnover. The 49ers had chances to go ahead big in the third quarter because Detroit had two turnovers on its first three plays, but they came away with only a field goal and a 13-point lead. Gore then caught a 7-yard pass, wobbled off the field and didn't return. QB Alex Smith's fumble midway through the third quarter set up a score that helped the Lions get back in the game. The 49ers drove down the field to set up K Joe Nedney's fourth field goal, a key score because it made Detroit go for a TD instead of kicking a tying field goal late in the game. S Keith Lewis intercepted QB Jon Kitna's pass at the 49ers' 2 with 2&#189; minutes left and San Francisco now 4-5 picked up the one first down it needed to seal the game, winning consecutive games for the second time since 2003. RB Frank Gore finished with career-high 159 yards rushing and San Francisco's QB Alex Smith was 14 of 20 for 136 yards with a fumble. WR Arnaz Battle caught six passes for 55 yards, and converted a third-and-4 on the final drive to allow the 49ers to run out the clock. The 49ers' defense again came up huge, allowing only 273 total offensive yards and forcing 4 turnovers. LB Brandon Moore was yet again the story, leading the team with 9 tackles, 2 sacks and forcing 2 turnovers. With the win, the 49ers advanced to 4-5.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n4\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context mentions that Detroit had two turnovers on its first three plays of the third quarter.', 'It also mentions that QB Alex Smith of the 49ers had a fumble.', \"Additionally, the context states that the 49ers' defense forced 4 turnovers in total.\", \"The context does not specify any other turnovers by the 49ers besides Alex Smith's fumble.\", 'Therefore, the total number of fumbles in the game is not explicitly stated, but the total number of turnovers (including fumbles and other types) is 4.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many points did Oakland win by?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Raiders traveled to Baltimore looking to win their third straight road game to open the season for the first time since 2000. The Ravens, undefeated on the season, looked to continue their good start. The Raiders jumped out early, taking a lead on a six-yard touchdown pass to Seth Roberts from Derek Carr. A Baltimore field goal tightened the lead before Carr hit Michael Crabtree for his first of three touchdown scores on the day, and the Raiders took a 14-6 lead to the half as the Raiders defense held the Ravens in check. Baltimore answered in the third quarter, pulling within two on a Joe Flacco one-yard touchdown run. Crabtree again answered for the Raiders on a 13-yard pass from Carr. However, the Raiders defense allowed a 52-yard pass and catch from Flacco to Steve Smith Sr. and the Ravens pulled within two after failing to convert on the two-point conversion. The Raiders lead tightened to 21-19. The Ravens struck again following a fumble by Raiders rookie running back DeAndre Washington and Terrance West scored three-yard touchdown run to take the Ravens first lead of the game 27-21. The Raiders answered, driving down the field before Carr hit Crabtree from 23 yards out. The Raiders took the lead 28-27. As time was running out, the Ravens looked for the game-winning field goal, but the Raiders defense held and the Raiders moved to 3-1 for the first time since 2000. The three-touchdown game marked Crabtree's first career three-touchdown game. Carr finished with four touchdowns on 199 yards passing. The Raiders defense, much maligned on the season, gave up 412 yards, but stopped the Ravens when needed.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n2\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The CONTEXT describes the game's scoring progression, ending with the Raiders leading 28-27.\", 'The final score mentioned in the CONTEXT is 28-27 in favor of the Raiders.', \"The difference between the Raiders' score (28) and the Ravens' score (27) is 1 point.\", 'The ANSWER provided states that Oakland won by 2 points, which contradicts the final score difference of 1 point as described in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich team scored the least points in the first half?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to break their current losing streak the Cowboys played on home ground for an Interconference duel with the Jaguars. In the first quarter the Cowboys took the lead as kicker David Buehler hit a 34-yard field goal. But they fell behind with QB David Garrard getting a 10-yard TD pass to WR Mike Sims-Walker. In the second quarter, the Cowboys struggled further with Garrard finding TE Marcedes Lewis on a 42-yard TD pass, then in the third quarter he found WR Mike Thomas on a 15-yard TD pass, and then he found Lewis again on a 9-yard TD pass. The Cowboys responded in the 4th quarter with RB Marion Barber getting a 1-yard TD run. But the Jaguars scored again with Garrard scrambling 2 yards to the endzone for a touchdown. The Cowboys replied with QB Jon Kitna making an 8-yard TD pass to TE Jason Witten.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Jaguars']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context describes the scoring events for both teams in the game.', 'In the first quarter, the Cowboys scored a field goal (3 points) and the Jaguars scored a touchdown with an extra point (7 points).', 'In the second quarter, the Jaguars scored another touchdown with an extra point (7 points), but there is no mention of the Cowboys scoring in the second quarter.', 'The total points scored by the Cowboys in the first half (first and second quarters) is 3 points.', 'The total points scored by the Jaguars in the first half is 14 points.', 'Comparing the scores, the Cowboys scored fewer points (3 points) than the Jaguars (14 points) in the first half.', \"Therefore, the correct answer to the question 'Which team scored the least points in the first half?' should be 'Cowboys', not 'Jaguars'.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich ancestral groups are at least 10%?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['German', 'Italian']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for ancestral groups that constitute at least 10% of the population.', \"According to the context, the ancestral groups with at least 10% are 'German' (22.5%) and 'Irish' (13.1%).\", \"The answer provided lists 'German' and 'Italian'.\", \"While 'German' is correctly included as it meets the 10% threshold, 'Italian' does not meet this criterion as it is only 9.8%.\", \"The correct answer should have included 'Irish' instead of 'Italian' to accurately reflect the ancestral groups that are at least 10%.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich team got on the board first?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nIn week 6, the Lions hosted the NFC West Division-leading San Francisco 49ers. The Lions struck first, when Jason Hanson kicked a 25-yard field goal that came after a San Francisco turnover. Detroit added to their lead when Brandon Pettigrew caught a 16-yard TD pass. In the second quarter, the 49ers finally got on the board with a 1-yard TD run by Frank Gore. San Francisco received a safety when Aldon Smith sacked Matthew Stafford in the end zone. The final points of the first half came just before intermission when David Akers of the 49ers kicked a 55-yard field goal, putting the Lions down at halftime for the fourth consecutive week. After the break, Detroit scored on a 24-yard field goal. San Francisco responded with a field goal of their own, this one from 31 yards out. In the fourth quarter, the Lions' Nate Burleson caught a 5-yard TD pass; the Lions went for a 2-point conversion but Calvin Johnson failed to catch Matthew Stafford's pass. In the final 2 minutes, the 49ers rallied from behind, first with a 6-yard TD catch by Delanie Walker, then a 37-yard field goal by David Akers, putting them up 25-19. With 1:02 left in the game, the Lions attempted another comeback, but San Francisco's defense held them off, handing Detroit its first loss of the season as the team fell to 5-1 and 2nd place in the NFC North. After the game, coaches Jim Schwartz and Jim Harbaugh got into an argument after Schwartz claimed Harbaugh pushed him out of the way when the two coaches were shaking hands.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n49ers\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context clearly states that the Lions struck first in the game, as Jason Hanson kicked a 25-yard field goal following a turnover by the San Francisco 49ers.', 'The 49ers scored their first points later in the game, with a 1-yard TD run by Frank Gore in the second quarter, which indicates they did not get on the board first.', \"The answer '49ers' is incorrect because it was the Lions who scored the initial points of the game, not the 49ers.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many field goals did Graham Gano have in the first half of the game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Panthers started off their season by making their first return to Levi's Stadium since losing to the Denver Broncos in Super Bowl 50. Late in the first quarter Cam Newton threw a 40-yard touchdown to Russell Sheppard followed by a Graham Gano field goal. The Panthers scored six more points in the second quarter with two field goals. In the third Jonathan Stewart scored a touchdown, followed by another Gano field goal. With 3:14 left to go in the third quarter, Gano made his third field goal of the day making the score 23-0. Robbie Gould's kick with thirteen seconds to go gave the 49ers their first points of the game. Neither the Panthers or 49ers scored in the fourth quarter, resulting in Carolina defeating San Francisco 23-3. They improved to 1-0.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n2\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context mentions that Graham Gano made a field goal late in the first quarter.', 'It also states that the Panthers scored six more points in the second quarter with two field goals.', \"Since both field goals in the second quarter are attributed to the team's score, it is implied that Gano made these field goals as well.\", 'Therefore, Gano made one field goal in the first quarter and two in the second quarter, totaling three field goals in the first half.', 'The answer provided (2) does not account for the field goal made in the first quarter, thus it is incorrect.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich team had a safety scored on them in the first half??\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nIn week 6, the Lions hosted the NFC West Division-leading San Francisco 49ers. The Lions struck first, when Jason Hanson kicked a 25-yard field goal that came after a San Francisco turnover. Detroit added to their lead when Brandon Pettigrew caught a 16-yard TD pass. In the second quarter, the 49ers finally got on the board with a 1-yard TD run by Frank Gore. San Francisco received a safety when Aldon Smith sacked Matthew Stafford in the end zone. The final points of the first half came just before intermission when David Akers of the 49ers kicked a 55-yard field goal, putting the Lions down at halftime for the fourth consecutive week. After the break, Detroit scored on a 24-yard field goal. San Francisco responded with a field goal of their own, this one from 31 yards out. In the fourth quarter, the Lions' Nate Burleson caught a 5-yard TD pass; the Lions went for a 2-point conversion but Calvin Johnson failed to catch Matthew Stafford's pass. In the final 2 minutes, the 49ers rallied from behind, first with a 6-yard TD catch by Delanie Walker, then a 37-yard field goal by David Akers, putting them up 25-19. With 1:02 left in the game, the Lions attempted another comeback, but San Francisco's defense held them off, handing Detroit its first loss of the season as the team fell to 5-1 and 2nd place in the NFC North. After the game, coaches Jim Schwartz and Jim Harbaugh got into an argument after Schwartz claimed Harbaugh pushed him out of the way when the two coaches were shaking hands.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['49ers']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context describes a safety being scored by the 49ers when Aldon Smith sacked Matthew Stafford in the end zone.', 'This indicates that the safety was scored against the Lions, not the 49ers.', \"The answer incorrectly lists the '49ers' as the team that had a safety scored on them, when it should have been the 'Lions'.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat war started first: Russo-Crimean War or Smolensk War?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\n1564: The city of Ryazan posad was burned.:47 1571: Russo-Crimean War 1572: Battle of Molodi 1591: Raid reaches Moscow. :116 1591: Artillery stops a raid at Kolomenskoy on the Bank Line. :52 1592: Suburbs of Moscow burned. Russian troops were away fighting Sweden.:17 1598: Crimeans stopped by Bank Line, withdraw and sue for peace.:46 1614: Nogai raids within sight of Moscow. During the Time of Troubles so many captives were taken that the price of a slave at Kaffa dropped to fifteen or twenty gold pieces.:66 1618: Nogais release 15,000 captives in peace treaty with Moscow. 1632: Force from Livny ambushed by Tatars and Janissaries. 300 killed and the rest enslaved.:67 1632: 20,000 Tatars raid the south, as troops were shifted north for the Smolensk War.:76 1633: 30,000 Tatars cross Abatis and Bank lines. Thousands were captured from Oka region.:76 This was the last deep raid into Muscovy. :26 1635: Many small war parties invaded Russia south of Ryazan.:79 1637,41-43: Several raids were led by Nogais and Crimean nobles without permission of Khan.:90 1643: 600 Tatars and 200 Zaporozhian Cossacks raid Kozlov. 19 were killed, and 262 were captured.:23 1644: 20,000 The Tatars raid southern Muscovy, 10,000 captives.:91 1645: A raid captures 6,000 captives. It is claimed that the Turks encouraged these raids to obtain galley slaves for a war with Venice.:91\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nSmolensk War\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks which war started first between the Russo-Crimean War and the Smolensk War.', 'The context provides the date for the Russo-Crimean War as starting in 1571.', 'The context mentions the Smolensk War in the year 1632.', 'Based on the dates given in the context, the Russo-Crimean War (1571) started before the Smolensk War (1632).', \"The answer 'Smolensk War' incorrectly identifies it as starting before the Russo-Crimean War, which is not supported by the dates in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich players caught touchdown passes in the first half?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to rebound from their tough overtime road loss to the Raiders, the Jets went home for a Week 8 duel with the Kansas City Chiefs. In the first quarter, New York took flight as QB Brett Favre completed an 18-yard TD pass to RB Leon Washington. In the second quarter, the Chiefs tied the game as QB Tyler Thigpen completed a 19-yard TD pass to TE Tony Gonzalez. The Jets would answer with Washington getting a 60-yard TD run. Kansas City closed out the half as Thigpen completed an 11-yard TD pass to WR Mark Bradley. In the third quarter, the Chiefs took the lead as kicker Connor Barth nailed a 30-yard field goal, yet New York replied with RB Thomas Jones getting a 1-yard TD run. In the fourth quarter, Kansas City got the lead again as CB Brandon Flowers returned an interception 91 yards for a touchdown. Fortunately, the Jets pulled out the win with Favre completing the game-winning 15-yard TD pass to WR Laveranues Coles. During halftime, the Jets celebrated the 40th anniversary of their Super Bowl III championship team.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Leon Washington', 'Tony Gonzalez', 'Thomas Jones']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question specifically asks for players who caught touchdown passes in the first half of the game.', 'Leon Washington is mentioned as having caught an 18-yard TD pass from Brett Favre in the first quarter.', 'Tony Gonzalez is mentioned as having caught a 19-yard TD pass from Tyler Thigpen in the second quarter.', 'Thomas Jones, however, is mentioned as getting a 1-yard TD run in the third quarter, which is not a touchdown pass and also not in the first half.', 'Mark Bradley, who caught an 11-yard TD pass from Tyler Thigpen in the second quarter, should be included in the answer instead of Thomas Jones.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow long was the Lion's longest field goal?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nTo start the season, the Lions traveled south to Tampa, Florida to take on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. The Lions scored first in the first quarter with a 23-yard field goal by Jason Hanson. The Buccaneers tied it up with a 38-yard field goal by Connor Barth, then took the lead when Aqib Talib intercepted a pass from Matthew Stafford and ran it in 28 yards. The Lions responded with a 28-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Detroit took the lead with a 36-yard touchdown catch by Calvin Johnson, and later added more points when Tony Scheffler caught an 11-yard TD pass. Tampa Bay responded with a 31-yard field goal just before halftime. The second half was relatively quiet, with each team only scoring one touchdown. First, Detroit's Calvin Johnson caught a 1-yard pass in the third quarter. The game's final points came when Mike Williams of Tampa Bay caught a 5-yard pass. The Lions won their regular season opener for the first time since 2007\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n36-yard\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question specifically asks for the longest field goal made by the Lions.', 'The context mentions two field goals made by the Lions: one from 23 yards and another from 28 yards.', \"The answer provided, '36-yard', refers to a touchdown catch by Calvin Johnson, not a field goal.\", 'The longest field goal mentioned in the context for the Lions is 28 yards, not 36 yards.', \"Therefore, the answer '36-yard' is incorrect as it does not accurately represent the longest field goal made by the Lions, but rather the distance of a touchdown reception.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many points were the latter at the end of the game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nIn week 6, the Lions hosted the NFC West Division-leading San Francisco 49ers. The Lions struck first, when Jason Hanson kicked a 25-yard field goal that came after a San Francisco turnover. Detroit added to their lead when Brandon Pettigrew caught a 16-yard TD pass. In the second quarter, the 49ers finally got on the board with a 1-yard TD run by Frank Gore. San Francisco received a safety when Aldon Smith sacked Matthew Stafford in the end zone. The final points of the first half came just before intermission when David Akers of the 49ers kicked a 55-yard field goal, putting the Lions down at halftime for the fourth consecutive week. After the break, Detroit scored on a 24-yard field goal. San Francisco responded with a field goal of their own, this one from 31 yards out. In the fourth quarter, the Lions' Nate Burleson caught a 5-yard TD pass; the Lions went for a 2-point conversion but Calvin Johnson failed to catch Matthew Stafford's pass. In the final 2 minutes, the 49ers rallied from behind, first with a 6-yard TD catch by Delanie Walker, then a 37-yard field goal by David Akers, putting them up 25-19. With 1:02 left in the game, the Lions attempted another comeback, but San Francisco's defense held them off, handing Detroit its first loss of the season as the team fell to 5-1 and 2nd place in the NFC North. After the game, coaches Jim Schwartz and Jim Harbaugh got into an argument after Schwartz claimed Harbaugh pushed him out of the way when the two coaches were shaking hands.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n25\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks for the points of 'the latter' at the end of the game, which refers to the last mentioned team in the context, the San Francisco 49ers.\", 'The context provides a detailed account of the scoring in the game, concluding with the 49ers scoring a 37-yard field goal by David Akers, which put them up 25-19.', 'The final score mentioned for the 49ers is 25 points.', \"The answer provided, '25', correctly matches the final score of the San Francisco 49ers as detailed in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich player caught a touchdown in both halfs?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Browns dropped their 13th consecutive season-opening game with a 21-18 loss to the Steelers. The scoring began early in the first quarter when Pittsburgh's Tyler Matakevich blocked a Britton Colquitt punt, knocking the ball into the end zone where it was recovered by Anthony Chickillo for a touchdown. The Browns were able to tie the score by the end of the first quarter, however, as rookie quarterback DeShone Kizer orchestrated a 12-play drive that ended when he scored on a 1-yard touchdown run. The game stayed at 7-7 through most of the second quarter, until the Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger connected with tight end Jesse James on a 4-yard touchdown with 45 seconds left in the first half. The 7-play, 91-yard scoring drive was highlighted by a 50-yard reception by Antonio Brown on a tipped ball. After a Zane Gonzalez field goal brought the Browns within 14-10 early in the third quarter, the Steelers drove down the field again. Roethlisberger threw a second touchdown pass to James to put them up by 11, 21-10. The drive was boosted by a 41-yard pass interference penalty on Browns cornerback Jamar Taylor on a deep pass intended for Brown. The score remained 21-10 until under four minutes remained in the game, when Kizer was able to throw his first career touchdown pass to Corey Coleman. A two-point conversion run by Isaiah Crowell brought the Browns to within a field goal, 21-18. The Browns did not get a chance to score again, however, as the Steelers were able to run out the clock after a long pass from Roethlisberger to Brown. Browns head coach Hue Jackson challenged the ruling; however, the catch call on the field was upheld. The 13th-straight season-opening loss extended an NFL record for the Browns, who also fell to 1-18 in season openers since returning to the league in 1999. The team also lost their 12th straight game against a divisional opponent. The team started 0-1.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Antonio Brown']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context describes two touchdown catches by Jesse James, one in the first half and another in the second half.', 'Antonio Brown is mentioned in the context, but only in relation to a 50-yard reception on a tipped ball and a long pass at the end of the game, neither of which were touchdowns.', 'The question specifically asks about a player who caught a touchdown in both halves, which according to the context, only applies to Jesse James.', 'The answer incorrectly lists Antonio Brown, who did not catch any touchdowns in the game described.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many more housing units are there than households?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n3500\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT provides the number of households as 79,667 and the number of housing units as 83,146.', 'To find the difference between the number of housing units and households, subtract the number of households from the number of housing units: 83,146 - 79,667 = 3,479.', 'The ANSWER provided is 3500, which is not exactly accurate when compared to the calculated difference of 3,479.', 'Thus, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it rounds the exact difference up, leading to a slight discrepancy.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich player caught the first TD of the game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to break their current losing streak the Cowboys played on home ground for an Interconference duel with the Jaguars. In the first quarter the Cowboys took the lead as kicker David Buehler hit a 34-yard field goal. But they fell behind with QB David Garrard getting a 10-yard TD pass to WR Mike Sims-Walker. In the second quarter, the Cowboys struggled further with Garrard finding TE Marcedes Lewis on a 42-yard TD pass, then in the third quarter he found WR Mike Thomas on a 15-yard TD pass, and then he found Lewis again on a 9-yard TD pass. The Cowboys responded in the 4th quarter with RB Marion Barber getting a 1-yard TD run. But the Jaguars scored again with Garrard scrambling 2 yards to the endzone for a touchdown. The Cowboys replied with QB Jon Kitna making an 8-yard TD pass to TE Jason Witten.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Marcedes Lewis']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context specifies that the first touchdown of the game was a 10-yard pass from QB David Garrard to WR Mike Sims-Walker.', 'Marcedes Lewis, mentioned in the answer, caught the second and fourth touchdowns of the game, not the first.', 'The answer incorrectly identifies Marcedes Lewis instead of Mike Sims-Walker as the player who caught the first touchdown.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many percent were not American?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n8.1\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the percentage of people who were not American.', \"The context provides the percentage of people who identified as 'American' in their ancestry, which is 8.1%.\", \"The answer provided, 8.1, directly corresponds to the percentage of people who identified as 'American', not those who did not.\", \"To find the percentage of people who were not American, one would need to subtract the percentage of people who identified as 'American' (8.1%) from 100%.\", \"The correct answer should be 91.9% (100% - 8.1%), which represents the percentage of the population that did not identify as 'American'.\", \"The answer given does not perform this calculation and instead incorrectly repeats the percentage of those who identified as 'American'.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many yards was the only rushing touchdown?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nTrying to rebound from back-to-back home losses, the Patriots traveled to Lambeau Field for a Week 11 showdown with the Green Bay Packers. In the first quarter, Brady hooked up with Graham on a two-yard touchdown pass for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, Dillon got a one-yard touchdown run, while Brady hooked up with Caldwell on a 54-yard touchdown pass. Late in the quarter Packers quarterback Brett Favre was sacked by Tedy Bruschi and was knocked out of the game with injury to his right (throwing) wrist. In the third quarter, Brady threw an eight-yard touchdown pass to Watson for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, New England put the game away with Brady throwing his fourth touchdown pass of the day to Maroney, a 19-yard strike. With the win, the Patriots improved to 7-3.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n2\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question specifically asks for the yardage of the only rushing touchdown in the game.', 'The context mentions that Dillon scored a one-yard touchdown run, which is the only rushing touchdown described.', \"The answer provided, '2', incorrectly refers to the two-yard touchdown pass from Brady to Graham, which is not a rushing touchdown but a passing touchdown.\", \"Therefore, the correct answer should be '1', representing the yardage of Dillon's rushing touchdown.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many more housing units are there than families?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n22758\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the difference between the number of housing units and the number of families.', 'From the context, there are 83,146 housing units and 60,387 families.', 'To find the difference, subtract the number of families from the number of housing units: 83,146 - 60,387 = 22,759.', 'The answer provided is 22,758, which is off by 1 from the correct calculation of 22,759.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many points did Carolina win by?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Panthers started off their season by making their first return to Levi's Stadium since losing to the Denver Broncos in Super Bowl 50. Late in the first quarter Cam Newton threw a 40-yard touchdown to Russell Sheppard followed by a Graham Gano field goal. The Panthers scored six more points in the second quarter with two field goals. In the third Jonathan Stewart scored a touchdown, followed by another Gano field goal. With 3:14 left to go in the third quarter, Gano made his third field goal of the day making the score 23-0. Robbie Gould's kick with thirteen seconds to go gave the 49ers their first points of the game. Neither the Panthers or 49ers scored in the fourth quarter, resulting in Carolina defeating San Francisco 23-3. They improved to 1-0.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n21\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The final score of the game was 23-3 in favor of the Carolina Panthers.', \"To find the margin by which Carolina won, subtract the 49ers' score from the Panthers' score: 23 - 3 = 20.\", 'The answer provided was 21, which is incorrect.', 'The correct margin of victory for Carolina is 20 points, not 21.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho lost to Petrova in the Australian Open?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nComing off their road win over the Redskins, the Chiefs went home, donned their Dallas Texans throwbacks, and played a Week 7 AFL Legacy game with the San Diego Chargers. Kansas City would find themselves trailing in the first quarter as Chargers quarterback Philip Rivers completed a 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Malcom Floyd, followed by a 10-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Vincent Jackson. San Diego would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 20-yard and a 39-yard field goal from kicker Nate Kaeding. The Chiefs would get onto the board in the third quarter with quarterback Matt Cassel completing a 7-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Dwayne Bowe, but the Chargers kept their momentum going with Rivers finding running back Darren Sproles on a 58-yard touchdown pass. In the fourth quarter, San Diego sealed the win with Kaeding's 19-yard field goal and fullback Jacob Hester recovering a blocked punt in the end zone for a touchdown. With the loss, Kansas City went into their bye week at 1-6. Larry Johnson was suspended for two weeks after he made offensive comments about Todd Haley and made offensive comments about homosexuals on Twitter and in public.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Maria Sharapova', 'Venus Williams', 'Svetlana Kuznetsova']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT provided is about an American football game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the San Diego Chargers, detailing the events and scores of the game.', 'The QUESTION asks about a tennis match at the Australian Open involving a player named Petrova.', 'The ANSWER lists tennis players Maria Sharapova, Venus Williams, and Svetlana Kuznetsova, which are unrelated to the football game described in the CONTEXT.', 'There is no mention of Petrova, the Australian Open, or any tennis-related content in the CONTEXT.', 'The ANSWER does not address the QUESTION faithfully because it does not connect to the provided CONTEXT, which is entirely about a different sport and event.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many years before Navarrase used the captivity of John II?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe French king, John II, had been held captive in England. The Treaty of Brétigny set his ransom at 3 million crowns and allowed for hostages to be held in lieu of John. The hostages included two of his sons, several princes and nobles, four inhabitants of Paris, and two citizens from each of the nineteen principal towns of France. While these hostages were held, John returned to France to try and raise funds to pay the ransom. In 1362 John's son Louis of Anjou, a hostage in English-held Calais, escaped captivity. So, with his stand-in hostage gone, John felt honor-bound to return to captivity in England. The French crown had been at odds with Navarre since 1354, and in 1363 the Navarrese used the captivity of John II in London and the political weakness of the Dauphin to try to seize power. Although there was no formal treaty, Edward III supported the Navarrese moves, particularly as there was a prospect that he might gain control over the northern and western provinces as a consequence. With this in mind, Edward deliberately slowed the peace negotiations. In 1364, John II died in London, while still in honourable captivity. Charles V succeeded him as king of France. On 7 May 1364, one month after the dauphin's accession and three days before his coronation as Charles V, the Navarrese suffered a crushing defeat at the Battle of Cocherel.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n8\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT states that the Navarrese used the captivity of John II in 1363.', 'John II was captured and held in England, and the political situation surrounding his captivity was exploited by the Navarrese in 1363.', \"The CONTEXT does not provide a specific starting point or reference year from which to calculate a duration leading up to 1363 when the Navarrese used John II's captivity.\", \"The ANSWER '8' implies a calculation of years, but there is no clear reference point or event in the CONTEXT from which to subtract or to which the number '8' could logically apply.\", \"Therefore, the ANSWER '8' is not faithful to the CONTEXT as it does not correspond to any specific duration or timeline mentioned or implied in the CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many in percent from the census weren't German?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n22.5\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for the percentage of the population that were not German, based on the census data.', 'The CONTEXT provides that 22.5% of the population were of German ancestry.', 'To find the percentage of the population that were not German, one would subtract the percentage of German ancestry from 100%.', 'The correct calculation should be 100% - 22.5% = 77.5%.', 'The ANSWER provided is 22.5, which incorrectly represents the percentage of the population that were German, not the percentage that were not German.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many points did the buccaneers need to tie in the first?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nTo start the season, the Lions traveled south to Tampa, Florida to take on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. The Lions scored first in the first quarter with a 23-yard field goal by Jason Hanson. The Buccaneers tied it up with a 38-yard field goal by Connor Barth, then took the lead when Aqib Talib intercepted a pass from Matthew Stafford and ran it in 28 yards. The Lions responded with a 28-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Detroit took the lead with a 36-yard touchdown catch by Calvin Johnson, and later added more points when Tony Scheffler caught an 11-yard TD pass. Tampa Bay responded with a 31-yard field goal just before halftime. The second half was relatively quiet, with each team only scoring one touchdown. First, Detroit's Calvin Johnson caught a 1-yard pass in the third quarter. The game's final points came when Mike Williams of Tampa Bay caught a 5-yard pass. The Lions won their regular season opener for the first time since 2007\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n7\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context states that the Lions scored first with a 3-point field goal.', 'The Buccaneers then tied the game with their own 3-point field goal.', \"To tie the game after the Lions' initial 3 points, the Buccaneers needed exactly 3 points, which they achieved with a field goal.\", \"The answer '7' suggests the Buccaneers needed a touchdown (6 points) and an extra point (1 point) to tie, which is incorrect based on the context provided.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho threw the first touchdown pass of the game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nTo start the season, the Lions traveled south to Tampa, Florida to take on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. The Lions scored first in the first quarter with a 23-yard field goal by Jason Hanson. The Buccaneers tied it up with a 38-yard field goal by Connor Barth, then took the lead when Aqib Talib intercepted a pass from Matthew Stafford and ran it in 28 yards. The Lions responded with a 28-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Detroit took the lead with a 36-yard touchdown catch by Calvin Johnson, and later added more points when Tony Scheffler caught an 11-yard TD pass. Tampa Bay responded with a 31-yard field goal just before halftime. The second half was relatively quiet, with each team only scoring one touchdown. First, Detroit's Calvin Johnson caught a 1-yard pass in the third quarter. The game's final points came when Mike Williams of Tampa Bay caught a 5-yard pass. The Lions won their regular season opener for the first time since 2007\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nCalvin Johnson\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks who threw the first touchdown pass of the game, which requires identifying the passer, not the receiver.', 'The context mentions that the first touchdown of the game was a 36-yard catch by Calvin Johnson.', 'Calvin Johnson is identified as the receiver of the touchdown, not the thrower.', 'The context implies that Matthew Stafford, being the quarterback for the Lions, likely threw the pass to Calvin Johnson, although his name is not explicitly mentioned in connection with this specific play.', \"The answer 'Calvin Johnson' incorrectly identifies the receiver of the touchdown as the person who threw it.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich player scored the fist points of the game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Browns dropped their 13th consecutive season-opening game with a 21-18 loss to the Steelers. The scoring began early in the first quarter when Pittsburgh's Tyler Matakevich blocked a Britton Colquitt punt, knocking the ball into the end zone where it was recovered by Anthony Chickillo for a touchdown. The Browns were able to tie the score by the end of the first quarter, however, as rookie quarterback DeShone Kizer orchestrated a 12-play drive that ended when he scored on a 1-yard touchdown run. The game stayed at 7-7 through most of the second quarter, until the Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger connected with tight end Jesse James on a 4-yard touchdown with 45 seconds left in the first half. The 7-play, 91-yard scoring drive was highlighted by a 50-yard reception by Antonio Brown on a tipped ball. After a Zane Gonzalez field goal brought the Browns within 14-10 early in the third quarter, the Steelers drove down the field again. Roethlisberger threw a second touchdown pass to James to put them up by 11, 21-10. The drive was boosted by a 41-yard pass interference penalty on Browns cornerback Jamar Taylor on a deep pass intended for Brown. The score remained 21-10 until under four minutes remained in the game, when Kizer was able to throw his first career touchdown pass to Corey Coleman. A two-point conversion run by Isaiah Crowell brought the Browns to within a field goal, 21-18. The Browns did not get a chance to score again, however, as the Steelers were able to run out the clock after a long pass from Roethlisberger to Brown. Browns head coach Hue Jackson challenged the ruling; however, the catch call on the field was upheld. The 13th-straight season-opening loss extended an NFL record for the Browns, who also fell to 1-18 in season openers since returning to the league in 1999. The team also lost their 12th straight game against a divisional opponent. The team started 0-1.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nTyler Matakevich\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks which player scored the first points of the game.', 'The context describes that the first points were scored when Tyler Matakevich blocked a punt, leading to the ball being recovered by Anthony Chickillo for a touchdown.', 'Although Tyler Matakevich initiated the play that led to the first points by blocking the punt, he did not actually score the points.', 'The actual scorer of the first points was Anthony Chickillo, who recovered the blocked punt in the end zone for a touchdown.', 'Therefore, the answer should be Anthony Chickillo, not Tyler Matakevich.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many yards was the longest pass?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nTrying to snap a two-game skid, the Bills flew to Gillette Stadium for a Week 3 divisional fight with the New England Patriots. In the first quarter, QB J. P. Losman was immediately injured on the first offensive play of the game. He would finish the series, but ended up on the bench for the rest of the game. After New England took the lead with kicker Stephen Gostkowski's 24-yard field goal, rookie QB Trent Edwards played the rest of the game for Buffalo. The Bills would get their only score of the game as RB Marshawn Lynch got an 8-yard TD run, and a Rian Lindell extra point put the Bills ahead surprisingly 7-3. However, in the second quarter, the Patriots were able to open up their running game when Bills rookie standout Paul Posluszny was lost due to a broken arm. This left passing lanes open, and for the rest of the game, the Patriots dominated. QB Tom Brady's 8-yard TD pass to TE Benjamin Watson and a 3-yard TD pass to WR Randy Moss made it 17-7 at the half. In the third quarter, New England continued its conquest with Brady's 4-yard TD pass to WR Jabar Gaffney and RB Sammy Morris' 4-yard TD run. In the fourth quarter, the Patriots ended the day with Brady and Moss hooking up with each other again on a 45-yard TD pass.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n44\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context explicitly states that the longest pass was a 45-yard touchdown pass from Tom Brady to Randy Moss in the fourth quarter.', 'The answer provided is 44, which is incorrect as it does not match the 45-yard pass mentioned in the context.', 'There is no mention of any other pass in the context that matches or exceeds the length of 44 yards, further confirming that the 45-yard pass is the longest.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many percent were not German?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n22.5\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the percentage of the population that were not German.', 'The context provides that 22.5% of the population were of German ancestry.', 'To find the percentage of the population that were not German, one must subtract the percentage of German ancestry from 100%.', 'The correct calculation should be 100% - 22.5% = 77.5%.', 'The answer provided (22.5) incorrectly repeats the percentage of the population that were German, rather than calculating the percentage that were not German.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho had the most receiving yards?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nComing off their road win over the Redskins, the Chiefs went home, donned their Dallas Texans throwbacks, and played a Week 7 AFL Legacy game with the San Diego Chargers. Kansas City would find themselves trailing in the first quarter as Chargers quarterback Philip Rivers completed a 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Malcom Floyd, followed by a 10-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Vincent Jackson. San Diego would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 20-yard and a 39-yard field goal from kicker Nate Kaeding. The Chiefs would get onto the board in the third quarter with quarterback Matt Cassel completing a 7-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Dwayne Bowe, but the Chargers kept their momentum going with Rivers finding running back Darren Sproles on a 58-yard touchdown pass. In the fourth quarter, San Diego sealed the win with Kaeding's 19-yard field goal and fullback Jacob Hester recovering a blocked punt in the end zone for a touchdown. With the loss, Kansas City went into their bye week at 1-6. Larry Johnson was suspended for two weeks after he made offensive comments about Todd Haley and made offensive comments about homosexuals on Twitter and in public.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Vincent Jackson']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context mentions several players receiving touchdown passes, including Malcom Floyd, Vincent Jackson, Dwayne Bowe, and Darren Sproles.', 'Vincent Jackson is mentioned as having caught a 10-yard touchdown pass.', 'Darren Sproles is mentioned as having caught a 58-yard touchdown pass, which is the longest single reception noted in the context.', 'The question specifically asks who had the most receiving yards, which implies the total yards received, not just from scoring plays.', \"Given that Darren Sproles' 58-yard reception is the longest mentioned, it suggests he might have had the most receiving yards in that game, unless other receptions not detailed in the context added significantly to another player's total.\", \"The answer 'Vincent Jackson' does not account for the fact that Darren Sproles had a longer reception, and without additional information on total yards, it seems unfaithful to the context provided.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many percent were not Polish?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n92\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the percentage of the population that were not Polish.', 'The context provides the percentage of the population with Polish ancestry as 6.0%.', 'To find the percentage of the population that were not Polish, one would subtract the percentage of Polish ancestry from 100%.', '100% - 6.0% = 94%.', 'The answer provided is 92%, which does not match the calculated value of 94%.', 'Therefore, the answer is incorrect as it should be 94% based on the information given in the context.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many more touchdowns were scored in the first half compared to the second half?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Browns dropped their 13th consecutive season-opening game with a 21-18 loss to the Steelers. The scoring began early in the first quarter when Pittsburgh's Tyler Matakevich blocked a Britton Colquitt punt, knocking the ball into the end zone where it was recovered by Anthony Chickillo for a touchdown. The Browns were able to tie the score by the end of the first quarter, however, as rookie quarterback DeShone Kizer orchestrated a 12-play drive that ended when he scored on a 1-yard touchdown run. The game stayed at 7-7 through most of the second quarter, until the Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger connected with tight end Jesse James on a 4-yard touchdown with 45 seconds left in the first half. The 7-play, 91-yard scoring drive was highlighted by a 50-yard reception by Antonio Brown on a tipped ball. After a Zane Gonzalez field goal brought the Browns within 14-10 early in the third quarter, the Steelers drove down the field again. Roethlisberger threw a second touchdown pass to James to put them up by 11, 21-10. The drive was boosted by a 41-yard pass interference penalty on Browns cornerback Jamar Taylor on a deep pass intended for Brown. The score remained 21-10 until under four minutes remained in the game, when Kizer was able to throw his first career touchdown pass to Corey Coleman. A two-point conversion run by Isaiah Crowell brought the Browns to within a field goal, 21-18. The Browns did not get a chance to score again, however, as the Steelers were able to run out the clock after a long pass from Roethlisberger to Brown. Browns head coach Hue Jackson challenged the ruling; however, the catch call on the field was upheld. The 13th-straight season-opening loss extended an NFL record for the Browns, who also fell to 1-18 in season openers since returning to the league in 1999. The team also lost their 12th straight game against a divisional opponent. The team started 0-1.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n2\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context describes three touchdowns in total: one by the Steelers in the first quarter, one by the Browns in the first quarter, and another by the Steelers in the second quarter.', 'The context also mentions a third touchdown by the Steelers in the third quarter and a fourth touchdown by the Browns in the fourth quarter.', 'The first half had two touchdowns scored (one by each team), and the second half also had two touchdowns scored (one by each team).', 'The question asks for the difference in the number of touchdowns scored in the first half compared to the second half.', 'Since both halves had an equal number of touchdowns (two each), the correct answer should be 0, not 2.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich player scored a special teams touchdown?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nComing off their road win over the Redskins, the Chiefs went home, donned their Dallas Texans throwbacks, and played a Week 7 AFL Legacy game with the San Diego Chargers. Kansas City would find themselves trailing in the first quarter as Chargers quarterback Philip Rivers completed a 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Malcom Floyd, followed by a 10-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Vincent Jackson. San Diego would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 20-yard and a 39-yard field goal from kicker Nate Kaeding. The Chiefs would get onto the board in the third quarter with quarterback Matt Cassel completing a 7-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Dwayne Bowe, but the Chargers kept their momentum going with Rivers finding running back Darren Sproles on a 58-yard touchdown pass. In the fourth quarter, San Diego sealed the win with Kaeding's 19-yard field goal and fullback Jacob Hester recovering a blocked punt in the end zone for a touchdown. With the loss, Kansas City went into their bye week at 1-6. Larry Johnson was suspended for two weeks after he made offensive comments about Todd Haley and made offensive comments about homosexuals on Twitter and in public.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Darren Sproles']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context describes various scoring plays by both the San Diego Chargers and the Kansas City Chiefs.', 'The touchdown by Darren Sproles mentioned in the context was a result of a 58-yard pass from Philip Rivers, which is an offensive play, not a special teams play.', 'The only special teams touchdown mentioned in the context was scored by Jacob Hester, who recovered a blocked punt in the end zone.', \"Therefore, the correct answer to the question about who scored a special teams touchdown should be 'Jacob Hester', not 'Darren Sproles'.\", \"The answer 'Darren Sproles' is incorrect because it incorrectly identifies the type of touchdown he scored.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many more people are there than housing units?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n135450\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the difference between the number of people and the number of housing units.', 'According to the context, there were 218,590 people and 83,146 housing units in the county.', 'To find the difference, subtract the number of housing units from the number of people: 218,590 - 83,146 = 135,444.', 'The answer provided is 135,450, which is not the correct result of the subtraction (135,444).', 'Therefore, the answer is not faithful to the context because it does not accurately reflect the correct calculation based on the provided data.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich ancestral group is smaller: English or Italian?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Italian']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks which ancestral group is smaller between English and Italian.', 'The context provides specific percentages for different ancestries in the county, stating 9.8% for Italian people and 9.2% for English.', 'From the context, the English ancestral group (9.2%) is smaller than the Italian ancestral group (9.8%).', 'The answer incorrectly identifies the Italian group as smaller, contradicting the data provided in the context.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many quarters did Trent Edwards play?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nTrying to snap a two-game skid, the Bills flew to Gillette Stadium for a Week 3 divisional fight with the New England Patriots. In the first quarter, QB J. P. Losman was immediately injured on the first offensive play of the game. He would finish the series, but ended up on the bench for the rest of the game. After New England took the lead with kicker Stephen Gostkowski's 24-yard field goal, rookie QB Trent Edwards played the rest of the game for Buffalo. The Bills would get their only score of the game as RB Marshawn Lynch got an 8-yard TD run, and a Rian Lindell extra point put the Bills ahead surprisingly 7-3. However, in the second quarter, the Patriots were able to open up their running game when Bills rookie standout Paul Posluszny was lost due to a broken arm. This left passing lanes open, and for the rest of the game, the Patriots dominated. QB Tom Brady's 8-yard TD pass to TE Benjamin Watson and a 3-yard TD pass to WR Randy Moss made it 17-7 at the half. In the third quarter, New England continued its conquest with Brady's 4-yard TD pass to WR Jabar Gaffney and RB Sammy Morris' 4-yard TD run. In the fourth quarter, the Patriots ended the day with Brady and Moss hooking up with each other again on a 45-yard TD pass.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n3\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context states that QB J.P. Losman was injured on the first offensive play of the game and finished only that series.', \"After Losman's injury, rookie QB Trent Edwards played the rest of the game for Buffalo.\", 'The game consists of four quarters, and since Edwards played from after the first series in the first quarter through the rest of the game, he played nearly the entire game.', 'Given that Edwards entered the game in the first quarter and the game continued through the fourth quarter, he played in all four quarters, not just three.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many yards was the longest touchdown pass?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to break their current losing streak the Cowboys played on home ground for an Interconference duel with the Jaguars. In the first quarter the Cowboys took the lead as kicker David Buehler hit a 34-yard field goal. But they fell behind with QB David Garrard getting a 10-yard TD pass to WR Mike Sims-Walker. In the second quarter, the Cowboys struggled further with Garrard finding TE Marcedes Lewis on a 42-yard TD pass, then in the third quarter he found WR Mike Thomas on a 15-yard TD pass, and then he found Lewis again on a 9-yard TD pass. The Cowboys responded in the 4th quarter with RB Marion Barber getting a 1-yard TD run. But the Jaguars scored again with Garrard scrambling 2 yards to the endzone for a touchdown. The Cowboys replied with QB Jon Kitna making an 8-yard TD pass to TE Jason Witten.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n34\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question specifically asks for the longest touchdown pass.', 'The answer provided, 34, corresponds to the length of a field goal made by David Buehler, not a touchdown pass.', 'The longest touchdown pass mentioned in the context is a 42-yard pass from David Garrard to Marcedes Lewis.', 'The answer should have been 42, not 34, to accurately reflect the longest touchdown pass described in the context.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many in percent from the census weren't Irish?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n87.1\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the percentage of the population that were not Irish.', 'The context provides the percentage of the population that were Irish, which is 13.1%.', 'To find the percentage of the population that were not Irish, one would subtract the percentage of Irish people from 100%.', '100% - 13.1% = 86.9%.', 'The answer provided is 87.1%, which is not the correct calculation based on the given data. The correct answer should be 86.9%.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich team got the first TD?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Raiders traveled to Baltimore looking to win their third straight road game to open the season for the first time since 2000. The Ravens, undefeated on the season, looked to continue their good start. The Raiders jumped out early, taking a lead on a six-yard touchdown pass to Seth Roberts from Derek Carr. A Baltimore field goal tightened the lead before Carr hit Michael Crabtree for his first of three touchdown scores on the day, and the Raiders took a 14-6 lead to the half as the Raiders defense held the Ravens in check. Baltimore answered in the third quarter, pulling within two on a Joe Flacco one-yard touchdown run. Crabtree again answered for the Raiders on a 13-yard pass from Carr. However, the Raiders defense allowed a 52-yard pass and catch from Flacco to Steve Smith Sr. and the Ravens pulled within two after failing to convert on the two-point conversion. The Raiders lead tightened to 21-19. The Ravens struck again following a fumble by Raiders rookie running back DeAndre Washington and Terrance West scored three-yard touchdown run to take the Ravens first lead of the game 27-21. The Raiders answered, driving down the field before Carr hit Crabtree from 23 yards out. The Raiders took the lead 28-27. As time was running out, the Ravens looked for the game-winning field goal, but the Raiders defense held and the Raiders moved to 3-1 for the first time since 2000. The three-touchdown game marked Crabtree's first career three-touchdown game. Carr finished with four touchdowns on 199 yards passing. The Raiders defense, much maligned on the season, gave up 412 yards, but stopped the Ravens when needed.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nThe Ravens\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context clearly states that the Raiders scored the first touchdown of the game with a six-yard touchdown pass to Seth Roberts from Derek Carr.', 'The answer incorrectly identifies the Ravens as the team that got the first touchdown, which contradicts the information provided in the context.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich player scored the last touchdown of the game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nComing off their road win over the Lions, the Steelers went home for a divisional match with the Cleveland Browns. After a scoreless first quarter, Pittsburgh came out striking in the second quarter as quarterback Ben Roethlisberger completed an 8-yard touchdown pass to tight end Heath Miller and a 52-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Hines Ward. The Browns immediately struck back as wide receiver Joshua Cribbs returned a kickoff 98&#160;yards for a touchdown. Pittsburgh would close out the half with a 32-yard field goal from kicker Jeff Reed. Cleveland tried to catch up as quarterback Derek Anderson completed a 1-yard touchdown pass to fullback Lawrence Vickers, yet the Steelers answered with a 2-yard touchdown run from running back Rashard Mendenhall. Pittsburgh would then close the game out in the fourth quarter with Reed kicking a 39-yard field goal. With their 12th-straight win over the Browns, the Steelers improved to 4-2. With the Ravens' loss to the Vikings, and the Bengals' loss to the Texans that same week, the Steelers are now tied with the Bengals at the top of the AFC North.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nBen Roethlisberger\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context describes multiple scoring plays by both the Steelers and the Browns.', 'Ben Roethlisberger is mentioned as having completed two touchdown passes in the second quarter, but not as the scorer of the last touchdown.', 'The last touchdown mentioned in the context is scored by Rashard Mendenhall, who ran 2 yards for a touchdown.', 'The context then describes the game closing with a field goal by Jeff Reed, not another touchdown.', \"Therefore, the answer 'Ben Roethlisberger' is incorrect because he did not score the last touchdown; Rashard Mendenhall did.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many yards longer was Philip Rivers' second touchdown pass compared to Matt Hasselbeck's touchdown pass?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Seahawks' third game was played at home ground when they played their former division rival, the San Diego Chargers. In the second quarter Seattle took the early lead when kicker Olindo Mare made a 23-yard field goal. Then QB Matt Hasselbeck completed a 9-yard TD pass to TE John Carlson. This was followed in the third quarter by RB Leon Washington returning a kickoff 101 yards to the endzone for a touchdown. The lead was broken down with QB Philip Rivers getting a 3-yard TD pass to WR Malcolm Floyd, followed by Hasselbeck getting sacked by ILB Brandon Siler in the endzone for a safety. Then kicker Nate Kaeding made a 29-yard field goal. The Seahawks increased their lead when Mare made a 23-yard field goal, but the Chargers replied and tied the game when Rivers found TE Antonio Gates on a 12-yard TD pass. (With a successful 2-point conversion as Rivers found WR Legedu Naanee). Before the clock struck zero Seattle took the winning score as RB Leon Washington returned his second kickoff of the game into the endzone running 99 yards for a touchdown. Rivers and the Chargers attempted to make a comeback with less than a minute left, but was picked off by rookie Earl Thomas to seal the win for Seattle.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n6\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT describes two touchdown passes by Philip Rivers: one for 3 yards to Malcolm Floyd and another for 12 yards to Antonio Gates.', \"Matt Hasselbeck's touchdown pass was for 9 yards to John Carlson.\", \"To find the difference in yards between Rivers' second touchdown pass and Hasselbeck's, subtract Hasselbeck's 9 yards from Rivers' 12 yards: 12 - 9 = 3.\", 'The ANSWER provided is 6, which does not match the correct calculation of 3 yards.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many field goals did Gould kick in the second half?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Panthers started off their season by making their first return to Levi's Stadium since losing to the Denver Broncos in Super Bowl 50. Late in the first quarter Cam Newton threw a 40-yard touchdown to Russell Sheppard followed by a Graham Gano field goal. The Panthers scored six more points in the second quarter with two field goals. In the third Jonathan Stewart scored a touchdown, followed by another Gano field goal. With 3:14 left to go in the third quarter, Gano made his third field goal of the day making the score 23-0. Robbie Gould's kick with thirteen seconds to go gave the 49ers their first points of the game. Neither the Panthers or 49ers scored in the fourth quarter, resulting in Carolina defeating San Francisco 23-3. They improved to 1-0.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n2\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context mentions Robbie Gould kicking only once in the game, which occurred with thirteen seconds left in the third quarter.', 'The context does not mention any field goals by Gould in the second half other than the one late in the third quarter.', \"The answer '2' suggests Gould kicked two field goals in the second half, which contradicts the information provided in the context.\", \"The correct answer, based on the context, should be '1' as it only records one field goal by Gould in the second half.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many in percent from the census weren't Italian?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n89.8\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the percentage of the population that were not Italian according to the census.', 'The context provides that 9.8% of the population were of Italian ancestry.', 'To find the percentage of the population that were not Italian, one would subtract the percentage of Italian ancestry from 100%.', '100% - 9.8% = 90.2%.', 'The answer provided is 89.8%, which does not match the calculated value of 90.2%.', 'Therefore, the answer is not faithful to the context as it does not accurately reflect the subtraction of the Italian percentage from the total population.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many years after John II returned to captivity did he die?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe French king, John II, had been held captive in England. The Treaty of Brétigny set his ransom at 3 million crowns and allowed for hostages to be held in lieu of John. The hostages included two of his sons, several princes and nobles, four inhabitants of Paris, and two citizens from each of the nineteen principal towns of France. While these hostages were held, John returned to France to try and raise funds to pay the ransom. In 1362 John's son Louis of Anjou, a hostage in English-held Calais, escaped captivity. So, with his stand-in hostage gone, John felt honor-bound to return to captivity in England. The French crown had been at odds with Navarre since 1354, and in 1363 the Navarrese used the captivity of John II in London and the political weakness of the Dauphin to try to seize power. Although there was no formal treaty, Edward III supported the Navarrese moves, particularly as there was a prospect that he might gain control over the northern and western provinces as a consequence. With this in mind, Edward deliberately slowed the peace negotiations. In 1364, John II died in London, while still in honourable captivity. Charles V succeeded him as king of France. On 7 May 1364, one month after the dauphin's accession and three days before his coronation as Charles V, the Navarrese suffered a crushing defeat at the Battle of Cocherel.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n3\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT states that John II returned to captivity in England in 1362 after his son Louis of Anjou escaped from captivity.', 'John II died in 1364 while still in captivity in London.', 'The time between 1362 and 1364 is two years.', 'Therefore, John II died two years after he returned to captivity, not three years as stated in the ANSWER.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many years after the Dutch returned to Brazil did the Portuguese continue to attack and prevent the Dutch from harvesting sugar?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nSurprised by such easy gains in the East, the Republic quickly decided to exploit Portugal's weakness in the Americas. In 1621 the Geoctroyeerde Westindische Compagnie was created to take control of the sugar trade and colonise America . The Company benefited from a large investment in capital, drawing on the enthusiasm of the best financiers and capitalists of the Republic, such as Isaac de Pinto, by origin a Portuguese Jew. The Dutch West India Company would not, however, be as successful as its eastern counterpart. The Dutch invasion began in 1624 with the conquest of the then capital of the State of Brazil, the city of São Salvador da Bahia, but the Dutch conquest was short lived. In 1625, a joint Spanish-Portuguese fleet of 52 ships and 12,000 men rapidly recaptured Salvador. In 1630 the Dutch returned, and captured Olinda and then Recife, renamed Mauritsstadt, thus establishing the colony of New Holland. The Portuguese commander Matias de Albuquerque retreated his forces inland, to establish a camp dubbed Arraial do Bom Jesus. Until 1635, the Dutch were unable to harvest sugar due to Portuguese guerrilla attacks, and were virtually confined to the walled perimeter of the cities. Eventually, the Dutch evicted the Portuguese with the assistance of a local landlord named Domingos Fernandes Calabar, but on his retreat to Bahia, Matias de Albuquerque captured Calabar at Porto Calvo, and had him hang for treason. The Portuguese fought back two Dutch attacks on Bahia in 1638. Nonenetheless, by 1641 the Dutch captured São Luís, leaving them in control of northwestern Brazil between Maranhão and Sergipe in the south\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n3\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT states that the Dutch returned to Brazil in 1630 and captured Olinda and Recife.', 'It also mentions that until 1635, the Dutch were unable to harvest sugar due to Portuguese guerrilla attacks.', 'This indicates that the Portuguese continued to attack and prevent the Dutch from harvesting sugar for 5 years after the Dutch returned in 1630.', \"The ANSWER provided is '3', which does not match the duration of 5 years as described in the CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich happened first, the Treaty of Brétigny or the Battle of Cocherel?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe French king, John II, had been held captive in England. The Treaty of Brétigny set his ransom at 3 million crowns and allowed for hostages to be held in lieu of John. The hostages included two of his sons, several princes and nobles, four inhabitants of Paris, and two citizens from each of the nineteen principal towns of France. While these hostages were held, John returned to France to try and raise funds to pay the ransom. In 1362 John's son Louis of Anjou, a hostage in English-held Calais, escaped captivity. So, with his stand-in hostage gone, John felt honor-bound to return to captivity in England. The French crown had been at odds with Navarre since 1354, and in 1363 the Navarrese used the captivity of John II in London and the political weakness of the Dauphin to try to seize power. Although there was no formal treaty, Edward III supported the Navarrese moves, particularly as there was a prospect that he might gain control over the northern and western provinces as a consequence. With this in mind, Edward deliberately slowed the peace negotiations. In 1364, John II died in London, while still in honourable captivity. Charles V succeeded him as king of France. On 7 May 1364, one month after the dauphin's accession and three days before his coronation as Charles V, the Navarrese suffered a crushing defeat at the Battle of Cocherel.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nBattle of Cocherel\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The context provides a timeline of events related to the French king John II's captivity and subsequent political developments.\", 'The Treaty of Brétigny is mentioned as setting the ransom for John II, which implies it was established during his captivity.', \"The Battle of Cocherel is specifically dated in the context to 7 May 1364, which is after the events involving the Treaty of Brétigny and John II's attempts to raise the ransom.\", \"Since the Treaty of Brétigny is associated with the initial terms of John II's ransom and his captivity, and the Battle of Cocherel occurred in 1364, it is clear that the Treaty of Brétigny happened before the Battle of Cocherel.\", \"The answer 'Battle of Cocherel' incorrectly suggests that the Battle of Cocherel happened first, which is not supported by the timeline provided in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich players made at least one field goal?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to break their current losing streak the Cowboys played on home ground for an Interconference duel with the Jaguars. In the first quarter the Cowboys took the lead as kicker David Buehler hit a 34-yard field goal. But they fell behind with QB David Garrard getting a 10-yard TD pass to WR Mike Sims-Walker. In the second quarter, the Cowboys struggled further with Garrard finding TE Marcedes Lewis on a 42-yard TD pass, then in the third quarter he found WR Mike Thomas on a 15-yard TD pass, and then he found Lewis again on a 9-yard TD pass. The Cowboys responded in the 4th quarter with RB Marion Barber getting a 1-yard TD run. But the Jaguars scored again with Garrard scrambling 2 yards to the endzone for a touchdown. The Cowboys replied with QB Jon Kitna making an 8-yard TD pass to TE Jason Witten.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Jon Kitna']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for players who made at least one field goal.', 'The context mentions that kicker David Buehler hit a 34-yard field goal for the Cowboys.', 'Jon Kitna, mentioned in the answer, is noted in the context as making an 8-yard TD pass, not a field goal.', 'Therefore, the correct answer should include David Buehler, not Jon Kitna, as he is the only player mentioned as making a field goal.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat did the Selective Draft Law Cases hold?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nIn the United States, conscription began in 1917 and was generally well received, with a few pockets of opposition in isolated rural areas. The administration decided to rely primarily on conscription, rather than voluntary enlistment, to raise military manpower for when only 73,000 volunteers enlisted out of the initial 1 million target in the first six weeks of the war. In 1917 10 million men were registered. This was deemed to be inadequate, so age ranges were increased and exemptions reduced, and so by the end of 1918 this increased to 24 million men that were registered with nearly 3 million inducted into the military services. The draft was universal and included blacks on the same terms as whites, although they served in different units. In all 367,710 black Americans were drafted , compared to 2,442,586 white . Forms of resistance ranged from peaceful protest to violent demonstrations and from humble letter-writing campaigns asking for mercy to radical newspapers demanding reform. The most common tactics were dodging and desertion, and many communities sheltered and defended their draft dodgers as political heroes. Many socialists were jailed for \"obstructing the recruitment or enlistment service\". The most famous was Eugene Debs, head of the Socialist Party of America, who ran for president in 1920 from his prison cell. In 1917 a number of radicals and anarchists challenged the new draft law in federal court, arguing that it was a direct violation of the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition against slavery and involuntary servitude. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the constitutionality of the draft act in the Selective Draft Law Cases on January 7, 1918.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nunconstitutionality of the draft act\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER states the 'unconstitutionality of the draft act', which is incorrect based on the CONTEXT provided.\", 'The CONTEXT explicitly mentions that the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the constitutionality of the draft act in the Selective Draft Law Cases on January 7, 1918.', 'The QUESTION asks about the holding in the Selective Draft Law Cases, and the correct response should reflect that the Supreme Court found the draft act to be constitutional, not unconstitutional as stated in the ANSWER.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho did the Rams loose to in the previous game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to rebound from the road loss to the Chargers, the Rams went home for Week 9, as they fought the Kansas City Chiefs in a \"Show Me State Showdown\". The Chiefs struck first as RB Larry Johnson got a 1-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, things got worse for the Rams as QB Damon Huard completed a 3-yard TD pass to TE Tony Gonzalez, while kicker Lawrence Tynes nailed a 42-yard field goal. St. Louis got on the board with RB Steven Jackson getting a 2-yard TD run, yet Huard and Gonzalez hooked up with each other again on a 25-yard TD strike. Rams kicker Jeff Wilkins made a 41-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter, QB Marc Bulger completed a 2-yard TD pass to WR Kevin Curtis for the only score of the period, yet the only score of the fourth quarter came from Huard completing an 11-yard TD pass to TE Kris Wilson. With the loss, the Rams fell to 4-4.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nChiefs\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT describes a detailed account of a football game between the Rams and the Kansas City Chiefs.', 'It mentions that the Rams were hoping to rebound from a previous loss to the Chargers, indicating that the Chargers were the team the Rams lost to in the game before the one described.', 'The game detailed in the CONTEXT is against the Chiefs, not the Chargers.', \"Therefore, the correct answer to the question 'Who did the Rams lose to in the previous game?' should be 'Chargers', not 'Chiefs' as stated in the ANSWER.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nhow many yards did pettigrew catch?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nIn week 6, the Lions hosted the NFC West Division-leading San Francisco 49ers. The Lions struck first, when Jason Hanson kicked a 25-yard field goal that came after a San Francisco turnover. Detroit added to their lead when Brandon Pettigrew caught a 16-yard TD pass. In the second quarter, the 49ers finally got on the board with a 1-yard TD run by Frank Gore. San Francisco received a safety when Aldon Smith sacked Matthew Stafford in the end zone. The final points of the first half came just before intermission when David Akers of the 49ers kicked a 55-yard field goal, putting the Lions down at halftime for the fourth consecutive week. After the break, Detroit scored on a 24-yard field goal. San Francisco responded with a field goal of their own, this one from 31 yards out. In the fourth quarter, the Lions' Nate Burleson caught a 5-yard TD pass; the Lions went for a 2-point conversion but Calvin Johnson failed to catch Matthew Stafford's pass. In the final 2 minutes, the 49ers rallied from behind, first with a 6-yard TD catch by Delanie Walker, then a 37-yard field goal by David Akers, putting them up 25-19. With 1:02 left in the game, the Lions attempted another comeback, but San Francisco's defense held them off, handing Detroit its first loss of the season as the team fell to 5-1 and 2nd place in the NFC North. After the game, coaches Jim Schwartz and Jim Harbaugh got into an argument after Schwartz claimed Harbaugh pushed him out of the way when the two coaches were shaking hands.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n18\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context specifically mentions that Brandon Pettigrew caught a 16-yard TD pass.', 'There is no mention of any other receptions by Pettigrew in the provided context.', 'The answer provided is 18 yards, which does not match the 16 yards mentioned in the context.', 'Therefore, the answer is not faithful to the context as it inaccurately represents the total yards caught by Pettigrew.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen did the first success of a defeat happen for Momchil?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nIn 1344, Momchil, the independent Bulgarian ruler of the Rhodope and Aegean regions, whose army grew to 2,000 men, took an important role in the Byzantine civil war. While at first he supported John Kantakouzenos, from the spring of 1344 Momchil reneged, provoked by the aggression of the Ottoman allies. In June he defeated the Ottoman fleet near the Portogalos bay. According to sources, at night the Bulgarian ruler sent boats to burn the anchored Ottoman ships and soon after he defeated the army of Kantakouzenos at Mosynopolis. Probably the first local ruler to become aware of the impending Ottoman threat, Momchil unsuccessfully pleaded with the emperors of Bulgaria and Byzantium for help. Even though his troops continued the resistance in the Eastern Rhodopes, in May 1345 the Turks led by Umur Beg marched from Asia Minor and devastated Bulgarian territories driving away people and livestock. Soon after, on 7 July 1345, Ottoman forces under Umur Beg defeated Momchil's army in the battle of Peritor near his capital Xanthi. Sources attest that the independent ruler perished in the battle without leaving asuccessor, and with little political will or leadership left to counter the Ottoman invasion.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nMay\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks for the timing of the first 'success of a defeat' for Momchil, which implies a situation where Momchil was defeated but still achieved some form of success or strategic advantage.\", 'The context describes two major battles involving Momchil: one in June 1344 where he defeated the Ottoman fleet and another in July 1345 where he was defeated by Ottoman forces.', \"The answer 'May' does not correspond to any specific event of defeat for Momchil mentioned in the context. The only mention of May is in 1345 when the Turks devastated Bulgarian territories, but this does not describe a battle or a defeat of Momchil's forces directly.\", 'The first actual defeat of Momchil mentioned in the context occurred on 7 July 1345, when his army was defeated by Ottoman forces at the battle of Peritor.', \"Therefore, the answer 'May' is incorrect as it does not align with the context provided about Momchil's defeats, particularly the first significant defeat which occurred in July 1345.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many total yards of field goals did John Kasay make?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nTrying to rebound from their divisional home loss to the Buccaneers, the Panthers flew to the Louisiana Superdome for a Week 5 divisional duel with the winless New Orleans Saints. With QB Jake Delhomme out and done for the year with a right elbow injury, QB David Carr was given the start. In the first quarter, Carolina took the early lead with kicker John Kasay getting a 23-yard field goal. The Saints responded with kicker Olindo Mare getting a 25-yard field goal. In the second quarter, the Panthers went back into the lead with Kasay nailing a 35-yard field goal. New Orleans would respond with Mare kicking a 28-yard field goal. In the third quarter, Carolina trailed as Saints FB Mike Karney got a 2-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, the Panthers tied the game with Carr completing a 17-yard TD pass to WR Steve Smith. Afterwards, Carolina sealed the win in the final seconds with Kasay nailing a 52-yard field goal as time ran out.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n120\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context provides specific distances for three field goals made by John Kasay: 23 yards, 35 yards, and 52 yards.', 'To find the total yards of field goals made by John Kasay, we need to add these distances together: 23 + 35 + 52 = 110 yards.', 'The answer provided is 120 yards, which does not match the sum of the distances of the field goals made by John Kasay as detailed in the context.', 'Therefore, the answer is incorrect because it does not accurately reflect the total yards calculated from the context.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many yards was the longest touchdown run of the game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Seahawks' third game was played at home ground when they played their former division rival, the San Diego Chargers. In the second quarter Seattle took the early lead when kicker Olindo Mare made a 23-yard field goal. Then QB Matt Hasselbeck completed a 9-yard TD pass to TE John Carlson. This was followed in the third quarter by RB Leon Washington returning a kickoff 101 yards to the endzone for a touchdown. The lead was broken down with QB Philip Rivers getting a 3-yard TD pass to WR Malcolm Floyd, followed by Hasselbeck getting sacked by ILB Brandon Siler in the endzone for a safety. Then kicker Nate Kaeding made a 29-yard field goal. The Seahawks increased their lead when Mare made a 23-yard field goal, but the Chargers replied and tied the game when Rivers found TE Antonio Gates on a 12-yard TD pass. (With a successful 2-point conversion as Rivers found WR Legedu Naanee). Before the clock struck zero Seattle took the winning score as RB Leon Washington returned his second kickoff of the game into the endzone running 99 yards for a touchdown. Rivers and the Chargers attempted to make a comeback with less than a minute left, but was picked off by rookie Earl Thomas to seal the win for Seattle.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n99\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question specifically asks for the longest touchdown 'run' of the game.\", 'The context mentions two long touchdowns by Leon Washington, both of which were kickoff returns (101 yards and 99 yards), not runs from scrimmage.', 'A kickoff return, while involving running, is categorized differently from a touchdown run, which typically refers to a play originating from scrimmage.', 'The longest touchdown run from scrimmage mentioned in the context is a 9-yard TD pass to TE John Carlson, which is a passing play, not a running play.', \"Therefore, the answer '99' refers to the second longest kickoff return by Leon Washington, not a touchdown run from scrimmage, making it unfaithful to the context given the specific phrasing of the question.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow long was Robbie Gould's field goal to end the first half?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nComing off their bye week, the Bears traveled to Lambeau Field to play the Green Bay Packers in the 189th meeting between the two rivals. The Bears had struggled regarding scoring against Green Bay in the last nine games between the two prior to 2013, and including the 2010 NFC title game, had scored 127 points, an average of 14.11 points. The two teams entered with among the top three scoring offenses, with Chicago and Green Bay ranked second and third, respectively, with 30.4 and 30.3 points per game, both of which rank behind the Denver Broncos. Among the weapons of the Packers offense that the Bears must attempt to hinder was the running game, as Green Bay's rookie running back Eddie Lacy has recorded over 100 yards per game in the previous six during the season, along with quarterback Aaron Rodgers. One of Rodgers' skills is passing balls longer than 20 yards, and was 16 of 32 on these attempts, which was tied with Russell Wilson of the Seattle Seahawks for the highest percentage in the league; the Bears allowed 57 percent of opponents to throw for the aforementioned distance, the second-worst score in the NFL. However, both teams ranked in the bottom five in the NFL in pass rush, with the Bears being in last with only nine sacks. For Chicago, Matt Fort&#233; had gained 533 yards along with averaging 4.6 yards per run, while Josh McCown filled in for Jay Cutler. Since 2009, Bears quarterbacks besides Cutler had thrown a combined eight touchdowns and 21 interceptions against the Packers; in McCown's last start in 2011 against the Packers, he threw for 242 yards, a touchdown and two interceptions in a 35-21 losing effort. On the Packers' first drive, Rodgers failed to recognize the Bears' zone defense, having expected a man-to-man defense, and Shea McClellin escaped Don Barclay's block and, along with Isaiah Frey, pulled Rodgers down, who landed on his shoulder and injured his left collarbone, and was replaced by Seneca Wallace for the remainder of the game. Afterwards, Mason Crosby kicked the 30-yard field goal to give the Packers the lead. On Chicago's first drive, McCown escaped pressure from Mike Neal and threw towards Brandon Marshall for the 7-3 lead. Once the Packers got the ball back, Wallace's pass for Jordy Nelson was tipped and intercepted by Julius Peppers, and was returned 14 yards to Green Bay's 45-yard line, but after the Bears failed to convert on third down, Adam Podlesh's punt was blocked by Jamari Lattimore. Eventually, James Starks ran 32 yards for the touchdown. However, the Bears traveled 60 yards on two plays, and Fort&#233; scored on the 1-yard run. The Bears ended the first half with Robbie Gould's 24-yard field goal to expand the lead to 17-10. In the third quarter, the Packers forced the Bears to punt, and Lacy ran 56 yards to the Bears' 1, and scored on the ensuing play. On the eventual kickoff, the Packers successfully attempted a surprise onside kick, which was recovered by Lattimore. Crosby kicked a 23-yarder on the drive. On the Bears' next drive, McCown threw a six-yard pass to Alshon Jeffery, whose size kept the ball from being knocked away by Davon House. After both teams exchanged punts in the fourth quarter, on the Bears' next drive, began attempting to run out the clock. On 4th and 1 at the Bears' 32 with 7:50 remaining, Fort&#233; ran three yards for the conversion and continuing the drive, which ended with Gould's 27-yard field goal. The drive lasted 18 plays and took up 8:58, leaving only 50 seconds remaining in the game. Despite a 15-yard pass by Wallace to Nelson, sacks by Corey Wootton and McClellin ended the game with a 27-20 victory for the Bears. McCown ended the night completing 22 of 41 passes for 272 yards and two touchdowns, while Wallace completed 11 of 19 for 114 yards and an interception. The win marked the first time the Packers lost at home to an NFC North opponent since 2009, and the first win for the Bears at Lambeau Field since 2007.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nRobbie Gould's 27-yard field field goal\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The context specifically states that Robbie Gould's field goal to end the first half was a 24-yard field goal.\", 'The answer incorrectly states that the field goal was 27 yards, which is not supported by the context provided.', 'The 27-yard field goal mentioned in the context was actually kicked by Gould later in the game, not at the end of the first half.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich team won the game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nComing off their Bye Week, the Redskins avenged their Week 2 loss by defeating the Dallas Cowboys after a wild final minute of the fourth quarter which ended with a game-winning 47-yard field goal by kicker Nick Novak. With less than a minute left in the fourth quarter, Dallas kicker Mike Vanderjagt's field goal was blocked by newly signed Redskins cornerback Troy Vincent, and recovered by Redskins free safety Sean Taylor, who ran the ball down to the Dallas 45-yard line with no time remaining. During the runback by Taylor, Dallas offensive lineman Kyle Kosier was flagged for a 15-yard facemask penalty, which moved the ball down to the Cowboys 30-yard line. The NFL Rulebook states that a game cannot end on a defensive penalty, thus, Washington was awarded one un-timed down. With the playclock at 0:00, Novak completed a 47-yard field goal to win the game, sending FedEx field into pandemoneum and improving the Redskins record to 3-5. Stats\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nCowboys\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context clearly states that the Redskins defeated the Dallas Cowboys after a game-winning 47-yard field goal by Nick Novak.', \"The context describes the sequence of events leading to the Redskins' victory, including a blocked field goal by the Redskins and a penalty against the Cowboys that set up the Redskins' game-winning field goal.\", \"The answer 'Cowboys' directly contradicts the information provided in the context, which explicitly states the Redskins won the game.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many more housing units are there than families?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n22758\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the difference between the number of housing units and the number of families in the county.', 'From the context, there are 83,146 housing units and 60,387 families.', 'To find the difference, subtract the number of families from the number of housing units: 83,146 - 60,387 = 22,759.', 'The answer provided is 22,758, which is off by 1 from the correct calculation of 22,759.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many days had passed from when The North Carolina Department of Transportation and South Carolina Department of Transportation Carolina departments of transportation previously agreed to an I-73 corridor crossing the state line along SC and NC 38 near Hamlet, North Carolina until SCDOT announced its preferred routing of I-73 between Myrtle Beach and Interstate 95 in South Carolina?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nOn May 30, 2006, SCDOT announced its preferred routing of I-73 between Myrtle Beach and Interstate 95 in South Carolina. I-73 will begin where South Carolina Highway 22 (SC 22) starts at U.S. Route 17 in South Carolina near Briarcliffe Acres, South Carolina. It will then proceed northwest crossing the proposed routing of I-74 (currently South Carolina Highway 31, the Carolina Bays Parkway). After passing Conway, South Carolina, I-73 will leave SC 22 at a new interchange to be constructed west of U.S. Route 701, and will then use a new highway to be built between SC 22 and South Carolina Highway 917 north of Cool Spring, South Carolina. I-73 will then use an upgraded SC 917 to cross the Little Pee Dee River. It will then proceed on a new freeway alignment between SC 917 and Interstate 95 in South Carolina that would have an interchange with U.S. Route 76 in South Carolina west of Mullins and then would proceed northwest to an exit with U.S. Route 501 near Latta, passing that city to the south before intersecting I-95 near South Carolina Highway 38. After crossing I-95, I-73 will use the chosen middle route, one of six potential alternative corridors that were studied all of which roughly paralleling SC 38 to proceed further north to the North Carolina state line. These alternative corridors were formally announced to the public on September 7, 2006, at a meeting in Bennettsville, South Carolina. The number of possible routes was reduced to three, and a final decision on the preferred northern route was announced on July 19, 2007. The central route caused the least disruption to homes, farms and wetlands. The North Carolina Department of Transportation and South Carolina Department of Transportation Carolina departments of transportation previously agreed to an I-73 corridor crossing the state line along SC and NC 38 near Hamlet, North Carolina, on February 11, 2005. Previously I-73 had been planned to cross the state line further west, near U.S. Route 1 in North Carolina south of Rockingham, North Carolina.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n472\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the number of days between two specific events: the agreement on the I-73 corridor crossing the state line (February 11, 2005) and the announcement of the preferred routing of I-73 between Myrtle Beach and Interstate 95 (May 30, 2006).', 'To find the number of days between these two dates, calculate the difference from February 11, 2005, to May 30, 2006.', 'Counting the days: From February 11, 2005, to February 11, 2006, is one year. Since 2005 was not a leap year, this period includes 365 days.', 'From February 11, 2006, to May 30, 2006, is an additional 108 days (February 19 days, March 31 days, April 30 days, and May 30 days).', 'Adding these together, 365 days + 108 days = 473 days.', 'The answer provided is 472 days, which is one day less than the correct calculation of 473 days.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many yards did Frank Gore have in the first half on runs other than his touchdown run?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nSan Francisco kept Detroit in the game with missed opportunities, then made just enough plays for a rare two-game winning streak and its first road win. RB Frank Gore set a franchise record with 148 yards rushing in the first half and scored on a 61-yard run before leaving with a concussion. San Francisco led 13-3 at halftime after scoring on three of its first four drives, wishing it had a bigger lead after out gaining Detroit 247-102 yards and recovering a fumble without giving up a turnover. The 49ers had chances to go ahead big in the third quarter because Detroit had two turnovers on its first three plays, but they came away with only a field goal and a 13-point lead. Gore then caught a 7-yard pass, wobbled off the field and didn't return. QB Alex Smith's fumble midway through the third quarter set up a score that helped the Lions get back in the game. The 49ers drove down the field to set up K Joe Nedney's fourth field goal, a key score because it made Detroit go for a TD instead of kicking a tying field goal late in the game. S Keith Lewis intercepted QB Jon Kitna's pass at the 49ers' 2 with 2&#189; minutes left and San Francisco now 4-5 picked up the one first down it needed to seal the game, winning consecutive games for the second time since 2003. RB Frank Gore finished with career-high 159 yards rushing and San Francisco's QB Alex Smith was 14 of 20 for 136 yards with a fumble. WR Arnaz Battle caught six passes for 55 yards, and converted a third-and-4 on the final drive to allow the 49ers to run out the clock. The 49ers' defense again came up huge, allowing only 273 total offensive yards and forcing 4 turnovers. LB Brandon Moore was yet again the story, leading the team with 9 tackles, 2 sacks and forcing 2 turnovers. With the win, the 49ers advanced to 4-5.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n85\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['Frank Gore had 148 yards rushing in the first half.', 'He scored on a 61-yard touchdown run.', 'To find the yards on runs other than the touchdown run, subtract the yards from the touchdown run from the total first half yards: 148 - 61 = 87 yards.', 'The answer provided is 85, which is incorrect.', 'The correct answer should be 87 yards.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many points did each team have at halftime?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to rebound from their tough overtime road loss to the Raiders, the Jets went home for a Week 8 duel with the Kansas City Chiefs. In the first quarter, New York took flight as QB Brett Favre completed an 18-yard TD pass to RB Leon Washington. In the second quarter, the Chiefs tied the game as QB Tyler Thigpen completed a 19-yard TD pass to TE Tony Gonzalez. The Jets would answer with Washington getting a 60-yard TD run. Kansas City closed out the half as Thigpen completed an 11-yard TD pass to WR Mark Bradley. In the third quarter, the Chiefs took the lead as kicker Connor Barth nailed a 30-yard field goal, yet New York replied with RB Thomas Jones getting a 1-yard TD run. In the fourth quarter, Kansas City got the lead again as CB Brandon Flowers returned an interception 91 yards for a touchdown. Fortunately, the Jets pulled out the win with Favre completing the game-winning 15-yard TD pass to WR Laveranues Coles. During halftime, the Jets celebrated the 40th anniversary of their Super Bowl III championship team.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n21\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The answer provided does not specify which team had 21 points at halftime, nor does it account for the points of both teams.', 'From the context, the Jets scored two touchdowns in the first half (one 18-yard TD pass and one 60-yard TD run), totaling 14 points assuming each touchdown was followed by a successful extra point.', 'The Chiefs also scored two touchdowns in the first half (one 19-yard TD pass and one 11-yard TD pass), which would similarly total 14 points assuming successful extra points.', 'The context does not mention any field goals, safeties, or additional scoring plays in the first half for either team.', \"Therefore, the correct answer should indicate that both teams had 14 points each at halftime, not just '21'.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many in percent from the census weren't Polish?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n93\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The CONTEXT provides detailed racial and ancestry composition of the county's population, including a specific percentage (6.0%) of people with Polish ancestry.\", 'The QUESTION asks for the percentage of the population that were not Polish.', 'To find the percentage of the population that were not Polish, one would subtract the percentage of Polish ancestry (6.0%) from 100%.', 'The correct calculation should be 100% - 6.0% = 94.0%.', 'The ANSWER provided is 93, which is incorrect as it does not match the calculated result of 94.0%.', 'The ANSWER should have been 94 instead of 93 to accurately reflect the percentage of the population without Polish ancestry.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many field goals did Gano kick in the third quarter?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Panthers started off their season by making their first return to Levi's Stadium since losing to the Denver Broncos in Super Bowl 50. Late in the first quarter Cam Newton threw a 40-yard touchdown to Russell Sheppard followed by a Graham Gano field goal. The Panthers scored six more points in the second quarter with two field goals. In the third Jonathan Stewart scored a touchdown, followed by another Gano field goal. With 3:14 left to go in the third quarter, Gano made his third field goal of the day making the score 23-0. Robbie Gould's kick with thirteen seconds to go gave the 49ers their first points of the game. Neither the Panthers or 49ers scored in the fourth quarter, resulting in Carolina defeating San Francisco 23-3. They improved to 1-0.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n3\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context mentions that Gano made a field goal late in the first quarter.', 'It also states that the Panthers scored six more points in the second quarter with two field goals by Gano.', \"In the third quarter, the context specifies that Gano made one field goal after Jonathan Stewart's touchdown and another field goal with 3:14 left in the quarter.\", 'This indicates that Gano kicked two field goals in the third quarter, not three as stated in the answer.', 'The total number of field goals Gano made throughout the game was four (one in the first quarter, two in the second quarter, and one in the third quarter).', \"Therefore, the answer '3' is incorrect as it does not accurately reflect the number of field goals Gano kicked in the third quarter.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho scored on the longest touchdown play of the game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to rebound from their tough overtime road loss to the Raiders, the Jets went home for a Week 8 duel with the Kansas City Chiefs. In the first quarter, New York took flight as QB Brett Favre completed an 18-yard TD pass to RB Leon Washington. In the second quarter, the Chiefs tied the game as QB Tyler Thigpen completed a 19-yard TD pass to TE Tony Gonzalez. The Jets would answer with Washington getting a 60-yard TD run. Kansas City closed out the half as Thigpen completed an 11-yard TD pass to WR Mark Bradley. In the third quarter, the Chiefs took the lead as kicker Connor Barth nailed a 30-yard field goal, yet New York replied with RB Thomas Jones getting a 1-yard TD run. In the fourth quarter, Kansas City got the lead again as CB Brandon Flowers returned an interception 91 yards for a touchdown. Fortunately, the Jets pulled out the win with Favre completing the game-winning 15-yard TD pass to WR Laveranues Coles. During halftime, the Jets celebrated the 40th anniversary of their Super Bowl III championship team.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nLeon Washington\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the player who scored on the longest touchdown play of the game.', 'The context mentions several touchdown plays, including an 18-yard TD pass to Leon Washington, a 19-yard TD pass to Tony Gonzalez, a 60-yard TD run by Leon Washington, an 11-yard TD pass to Mark Bradley, a 1-yard TD run by Thomas Jones, and a 91-yard interception return for a touchdown by Brandon Flowers.', 'Among these, the longest touchdown play was the 91-yard interception return by Brandon Flowers.', 'Leon Washington, mentioned in the answer, had a 60-yard touchdown run, which is not the longest touchdown play of the game.', 'Therefore, the correct answer should be Brandon Flowers, not Leon Washington.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many kickoff return touchdowns shorter than 100-yards did Leon Washington score?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Seahawks' third game was played at home ground when they played their former division rival, the San Diego Chargers. In the second quarter Seattle took the early lead when kicker Olindo Mare made a 23-yard field goal. Then QB Matt Hasselbeck completed a 9-yard TD pass to TE John Carlson. This was followed in the third quarter by RB Leon Washington returning a kickoff 101 yards to the endzone for a touchdown. The lead was broken down with QB Philip Rivers getting a 3-yard TD pass to WR Malcolm Floyd, followed by Hasselbeck getting sacked by ILB Brandon Siler in the endzone for a safety. Then kicker Nate Kaeding made a 29-yard field goal. The Seahawks increased their lead when Mare made a 23-yard field goal, but the Chargers replied and tied the game when Rivers found TE Antonio Gates on a 12-yard TD pass. (With a successful 2-point conversion as Rivers found WR Legedu Naanee). Before the clock struck zero Seattle took the winning score as RB Leon Washington returned his second kickoff of the game into the endzone running 99 yards for a touchdown. Rivers and the Chargers attempted to make a comeback with less than a minute left, but was picked off by rookie Earl Thomas to seal the win for Seattle.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n2\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question specifically asks for the number of kickoff return touchdowns shorter than 100-yards scored by Leon Washington.', 'According to the context, Leon Washington scored two kickoff return touchdowns in the game described.', 'The context details the lengths of both touchdowns: one was 101 yards and the other was 99 yards.', 'Only one of these touchdowns, the 99-yard return, meets the criteria of being shorter than 100 yards.', 'Therefore, the correct answer to the question should be 1, not 2.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many more people are there than families?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n158204\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the difference between the number of people and the number of families in the county.', 'According to the context, there were 218,590 people and 60,387 families residing in the county.', 'To find the difference, subtract the number of families from the number of people: 218,590 - 60,387 = 158,203.', 'The answer provided is 158,204, which is off by 1 from the correct calculation of 158,203.', 'Therefore, the answer is not faithful to the context because it does not accurately reflect the correct arithmetic difference between the number of people and the number of families.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nwhich player scored the longest field goal?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nComing off their road win over the Redskins, the Chiefs went home, donned their Dallas Texans throwbacks, and played a Week 7 AFL Legacy game with the San Diego Chargers. Kansas City would find themselves trailing in the first quarter as Chargers quarterback Philip Rivers completed a 3-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Malcom Floyd, followed by a 10-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Vincent Jackson. San Diego would add onto their lead in the second quarter with a 20-yard and a 39-yard field goal from kicker Nate Kaeding. The Chiefs would get onto the board in the third quarter with quarterback Matt Cassel completing a 7-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Dwayne Bowe, but the Chargers kept their momentum going with Rivers finding running back Darren Sproles on a 58-yard touchdown pass. In the fourth quarter, San Diego sealed the win with Kaeding's 19-yard field goal and fullback Jacob Hester recovering a blocked punt in the end zone for a touchdown. With the loss, Kansas City went into their bye week at 1-6. Larry Johnson was suspended for two weeks after he made offensive comments about Todd Haley and made offensive comments about homosexuals on Twitter and in public.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Matt Prater']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context does not mention Matt Prater at all, indicating that he was not involved in the described game between the Chiefs and the Chargers.', 'The context specifically mentions Nate Kaeding as the kicker for the San Diego Chargers, who scored field goals of 20 yards, 39 yards, and 19 yards.', 'The longest field goal mentioned in the context is 39 yards, scored by Nate Kaeding, not Matt Prater.', 'The question asks about the longest field goal in the specific game described in the context, and the answer should be based on the information provided within that context.', \"The answer 'Matt Prater' is incorrect because it does not align with the details given in the context about the game and the players involved.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many season openers have the Browns played since 1999?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Browns dropped their 13th consecutive season-opening game with a 21-18 loss to the Steelers. The scoring began early in the first quarter when Pittsburgh's Tyler Matakevich blocked a Britton Colquitt punt, knocking the ball into the end zone where it was recovered by Anthony Chickillo for a touchdown. The Browns were able to tie the score by the end of the first quarter, however, as rookie quarterback DeShone Kizer orchestrated a 12-play drive that ended when he scored on a 1-yard touchdown run. The game stayed at 7-7 through most of the second quarter, until the Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger connected with tight end Jesse James on a 4-yard touchdown with 45 seconds left in the first half. The 7-play, 91-yard scoring drive was highlighted by a 50-yard reception by Antonio Brown on a tipped ball. After a Zane Gonzalez field goal brought the Browns within 14-10 early in the third quarter, the Steelers drove down the field again. Roethlisberger threw a second touchdown pass to James to put them up by 11, 21-10. The drive was boosted by a 41-yard pass interference penalty on Browns cornerback Jamar Taylor on a deep pass intended for Brown. The score remained 21-10 until under four minutes remained in the game, when Kizer was able to throw his first career touchdown pass to Corey Coleman. A two-point conversion run by Isaiah Crowell brought the Browns to within a field goal, 21-18. The Browns did not get a chance to score again, however, as the Steelers were able to run out the clock after a long pass from Roethlisberger to Brown. Browns head coach Hue Jackson challenged the ruling; however, the catch call on the field was upheld. The 13th-straight season-opening loss extended an NFL record for the Browns, who also fell to 1-18 in season openers since returning to the league in 1999. The team also lost their 12th straight game against a divisional opponent. The team started 0-1.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n20\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT explicitly states that the Browns have a record of 1-18 in season openers since returning to the league in 1999.', 'This record indicates that they have played 19 season openers since 1999 (1 win + 18 losses = 19 games).', \"The ANSWER provided as '20' does not match the total number of season openers played by the Browns since 1999 as described in the CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many total points were scored by halftime?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nComing off their bye week, the Bears traveled to Lambeau Field to play the Green Bay Packers in the 189th meeting between the two rivals. The Bears had struggled regarding scoring against Green Bay in the last nine games between the two prior to 2013, and including the 2010 NFC title game, had scored 127 points, an average of 14.11 points. The two teams entered with among the top three scoring offenses, with Chicago and Green Bay ranked second and third, respectively, with 30.4 and 30.3 points per game, both of which rank behind the Denver Broncos. Among the weapons of the Packers offense that the Bears must attempt to hinder was the running game, as Green Bay's rookie running back Eddie Lacy has recorded over 100 yards per game in the previous six during the season, along with quarterback Aaron Rodgers. One of Rodgers' skills is passing balls longer than 20 yards, and was 16 of 32 on these attempts, which was tied with Russell Wilson of the Seattle Seahawks for the highest percentage in the league; the Bears allowed 57 percent of opponents to throw for the aforementioned distance, the second-worst score in the NFL. However, both teams ranked in the bottom five in the NFL in pass rush, with the Bears being in last with only nine sacks. For Chicago, Matt Fort&#233; had gained 533 yards along with averaging 4.6 yards per run, while Josh McCown filled in for Jay Cutler. Since 2009, Bears quarterbacks besides Cutler had thrown a combined eight touchdowns and 21 interceptions against the Packers; in McCown's last start in 2011 against the Packers, he threw for 242 yards, a touchdown and two interceptions in a 35-21 losing effort. On the Packers' first drive, Rodgers failed to recognize the Bears' zone defense, having expected a man-to-man defense, and Shea McClellin escaped Don Barclay's block and, along with Isaiah Frey, pulled Rodgers down, who landed on his shoulder and injured his left collarbone, and was replaced by Seneca Wallace for the remainder of the game. Afterwards, Mason Crosby kicked the 30-yard field goal to give the Packers the lead. On Chicago's first drive, McCown escaped pressure from Mike Neal and threw towards Brandon Marshall for the 7-3 lead. Once the Packers got the ball back, Wallace's pass for Jordy Nelson was tipped and intercepted by Julius Peppers, and was returned 14 yards to Green Bay's 45-yard line, but after the Bears failed to convert on third down, Adam Podlesh's punt was blocked by Jamari Lattimore. Eventually, James Starks ran 32 yards for the touchdown. However, the Bears traveled 60 yards on two plays, and Fort&#233; scored on the 1-yard run. The Bears ended the first half with Robbie Gould's 24-yard field goal to expand the lead to 17-10. In the third quarter, the Packers forced the Bears to punt, and Lacy ran 56 yards to the Bears' 1, and scored on the ensuing play. On the eventual kickoff, the Packers successfully attempted a surprise onside kick, which was recovered by Lattimore. Crosby kicked a 23-yarder on the drive. On the Bears' next drive, McCown threw a six-yard pass to Alshon Jeffery, whose size kept the ball from being knocked away by Davon House. After both teams exchanged punts in the fourth quarter, on the Bears' next drive, began attempting to run out the clock. On 4th and 1 at the Bears' 32 with 7:50 remaining, Fort&#233; ran three yards for the conversion and continuing the drive, which ended with Gould's 27-yard field goal. The drive lasted 18 plays and took up 8:58, leaving only 50 seconds remaining in the game. Despite a 15-yard pass by Wallace to Nelson, sacks by Corey Wootton and McClellin ended the game with a 27-20 victory for the Bears. McCown ended the night completing 22 of 41 passes for 272 yards and two touchdowns, while Wallace completed 11 of 19 for 114 yards and an interception. The win marked the first time the Packers lost at home to an NFC North opponent since 2009, and the first win for the Bears at Lambeau Field since 2007.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n24\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context provides a detailed breakdown of the scoring events in the first half of the game.', 'The Packers scored a 30-yard field goal by Mason Crosby, contributing 3 points.', 'The Bears scored a touchdown by Brandon Marshall and a successful extra point, contributing 7 points.', 'The Packers scored a touchdown by James Starks, contributing 7 points.', 'The Bears scored a 1-yard touchdown run by Matt Fort&#233; and a successful extra point, contributing 7 points.', 'The Bears scored a 24-yard field goal by Robbie Gould, contributing 3 points.', 'Adding these scores together, the Packers scored 10 points (3+7) and the Bears scored 17 points (7+7+3) by halftime.', 'The total points scored by halftime were 27 points (10+17), not 24 as stated in the answer.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen did Momchil defeat the Ottoman fleet near the Portogalos bay?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nIn 1344, Momchil, the independent Bulgarian ruler of the Rhodope and Aegean regions, whose army grew to 2,000 men, took an important role in the Byzantine civil war. While at first he supported John Kantakouzenos, from the spring of 1344 Momchil reneged, provoked by the aggression of the Ottoman allies. In June he defeated the Ottoman fleet near the Portogalos bay. According to sources, at night the Bulgarian ruler sent boats to burn the anchored Ottoman ships and soon after he defeated the army of Kantakouzenos at Mosynopolis. Probably the first local ruler to become aware of the impending Ottoman threat, Momchil unsuccessfully pleaded with the emperors of Bulgaria and Byzantium for help. Even though his troops continued the resistance in the Eastern Rhodopes, in May 1345 the Turks led by Umur Beg marched from Asia Minor and devastated Bulgarian territories driving away people and livestock. Soon after, on 7 July 1345, Ottoman forces under Umur Beg defeated Momchil's army in the battle of Peritor near his capital Xanthi. Sources attest that the independent ruler perished in the battle without leaving asuccessor, and with little political will or leadership left to counter the Ottoman invasion.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nJuly 1344\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT explicitly states that Momchil defeated the Ottoman fleet near the Portogalos bay in June.', \"The ANSWER provided is 'July 1344', which contradicts the specific month mentioned in the CONTEXT.\", 'The correct month for the defeat of the Ottoman fleet by Momchil is June, not July as stated in the ANSWER.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich team scored fewer points in the 1st quarter?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nTrying to rebound from back-to-back home losses, the Patriots traveled to Lambeau Field for a Week 11 showdown with the Green Bay Packers. In the first quarter, Brady hooked up with Graham on a two-yard touchdown pass for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, Dillon got a one-yard touchdown run, while Brady hooked up with Caldwell on a 54-yard touchdown pass. Late in the quarter Packers quarterback Brett Favre was sacked by Tedy Bruschi and was knocked out of the game with injury to his right (throwing) wrist. In the third quarter, Brady threw an eight-yard touchdown pass to Watson for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, New England put the game away with Brady throwing his fourth touchdown pass of the day to Maroney, a 19-yard strike. With the win, the Patriots improved to 7-3.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nPatriots\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context specifies that in the first quarter, the only score was a two-yard touchdown pass from Brady to Graham.', 'The context does not mention any scoring by the Green Bay Packers in the first quarter.', 'Since the Patriots scored a touchdown (which accounts for 6 points, plus potentially an extra point), and there is no mention of the Packers scoring, it can be inferred that the Packers scored fewer points in the first quarter.', \"The answer 'Patriots' is incorrect because it suggests that the Patriots scored fewer points in the first quarter, which contradicts the information given in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho is the Panthers quarterback?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Panthers started off their season by making their first return to Levi's Stadium since losing to the Denver Broncos in Super Bowl 50. Late in the first quarter Cam Newton threw a 40-yard touchdown to Russell Sheppard followed by a Graham Gano field goal. The Panthers scored six more points in the second quarter with two field goals. In the third Jonathan Stewart scored a touchdown, followed by another Gano field goal. With 3:14 left to go in the third quarter, Gano made his third field goal of the day making the score 23-0. Robbie Gould's kick with thirteen seconds to go gave the 49ers their first points of the game. Neither the Panthers or 49ers scored in the fourth quarter, resulting in Carolina defeating San Francisco 23-3. They improved to 1-0.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Teddy Bridgewater']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context describes a specific game where Cam Newton is mentioned as throwing a touchdown pass for the Panthers.', 'The question asks for the identity of the Panthers quarterback, and based on the context provided, Cam Newton was actively playing as quarterback in the described game.', \"The answer provided is 'Teddy Bridgewater', who is not mentioned anywhere in the context.\", \"Given that Cam Newton is explicitly mentioned as making a significant play as quarterback, the answer should have been 'Cam Newton'.\", \"The answer 'Teddy Bridgewater' is not faithful to the context as it does not align with the information given about the quarterback actively participating in the game described.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich team scored the second-longest field goal kick of the game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nHoping to rebound from the road loss to the Chargers, the Rams went home for Week 9, as they fought the Kansas City Chiefs in a \"Show Me State Showdown\". The Chiefs struck first as RB Larry Johnson got a 1-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, things got worse for the Rams as QB Damon Huard completed a 3-yard TD pass to TE Tony Gonzalez, while kicker Lawrence Tynes nailed a 42-yard field goal. St. Louis got on the board with RB Steven Jackson getting a 2-yard TD run, yet Huard and Gonzalez hooked up with each other again on a 25-yard TD strike. Rams kicker Jeff Wilkins made a 41-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter, QB Marc Bulger completed a 2-yard TD pass to WR Kevin Curtis for the only score of the period, yet the only score of the fourth quarter came from Huard completing an 11-yard TD pass to TE Kris Wilson. With the loss, the Rams fell to 4-4.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n['Chiefs']\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context mentions two field goals: one by Lawrence Tynes of the Chiefs for 42 yards and another by Jeff Wilkins of the Rams for 41 yards.', 'The question asks for the team that scored the second-longest field goal of the game.', \"Since Lawrence Tynes' field goal was 42 yards and Jeff Wilkins' was 41 yards, Tynes' field goal is the longest and Wilkins' is the second-longest.\", \"Therefore, the correct answer should be 'Rams' as they scored the second-longest field goal through Jeff Wilkins.\", \"The answer provided, 'Chiefs', is incorrect because the Chiefs scored the longest field goal, not the second-longest.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich kicker kicked the shortest field goal?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nThe Seahawks' third game was played at home ground when they played their former division rival, the San Diego Chargers. In the second quarter Seattle took the early lead when kicker Olindo Mare made a 23-yard field goal. Then QB Matt Hasselbeck completed a 9-yard TD pass to TE John Carlson. This was followed in the third quarter by RB Leon Washington returning a kickoff 101 yards to the endzone for a touchdown. The lead was broken down with QB Philip Rivers getting a 3-yard TD pass to WR Malcolm Floyd, followed by Hasselbeck getting sacked by ILB Brandon Siler in the endzone for a safety. Then kicker Nate Kaeding made a 29-yard field goal. The Seahawks increased their lead when Mare made a 23-yard field goal, but the Chargers replied and tied the game when Rivers found TE Antonio Gates on a 12-yard TD pass. (With a successful 2-point conversion as Rivers found WR Legedu Naanee). Before the clock struck zero Seattle took the winning score as RB Leon Washington returned his second kickoff of the game into the endzone running 99 yards for a touchdown. Rivers and the Chargers attempted to make a comeback with less than a minute left, but was picked off by rookie Earl Thomas to seal the win for Seattle.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nNate Kaeding\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context mentions two kickers, Olindo Mare and Nate Kaeding, who made field goals in the game.', 'Olindo Mare made two field goals, both of which were 23 yards each.', 'Nate Kaeding made a field goal of 29 yards.', \"Comparing the distances, Olindo Mare's field goals at 23 yards each were shorter than Nate Kaeding's 29-yard field goal.\", 'Therefore, Olindo Mare kicked the shortest field goal in the game, not Nate Kaeding as stated in the answer.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many years passed from the burning of Moscow suburbs until the Nogai raids withing sight of Moscow?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\n1564: The city of Ryazan posad was burned.:47 1571: Russo-Crimean War 1572: Battle of Molodi 1591: Raid reaches Moscow. :116 1591: Artillery stops a raid at Kolomenskoy on the Bank Line. :52 1592: Suburbs of Moscow burned. Russian troops were away fighting Sweden.:17 1598: Crimeans stopped by Bank Line, withdraw and sue for peace.:46 1614: Nogai raids within sight of Moscow. During the Time of Troubles so many captives were taken that the price of a slave at Kaffa dropped to fifteen or twenty gold pieces.:66 1618: Nogais release 15,000 captives in peace treaty with Moscow. 1632: Force from Livny ambushed by Tatars and Janissaries. 300 killed and the rest enslaved.:67 1632: 20,000 Tatars raid the south, as troops were shifted north for the Smolensk War.:76 1633: 30,000 Tatars cross Abatis and Bank lines. Thousands were captured from Oka region.:76 This was the last deep raid into Muscovy. :26 1635: Many small war parties invaded Russia south of Ryazan.:79 1637,41-43: Several raids were led by Nogais and Crimean nobles without permission of Khan.:90 1643: 600 Tatars and 200 Zaporozhian Cossacks raid Kozlov. 19 were killed, and 262 were captured.:23 1644: 20,000 The Tatars raid southern Muscovy, 10,000 captives.:91 1645: A raid captures 6,000 captives. It is claimed that the Turks encouraged these raids to obtain galley slaves for a war with Venice.:91\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n24\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT provides specific years for the burning of the suburbs of Moscow and the Nogai raids within sight of Moscow.', 'The suburbs of Moscow were burned in 1592.', 'The Nogai raids within sight of Moscow occurred in 1614.', 'To find the number of years between these two events, subtract the year of the burning (1592) from the year of the Nogai raids (1614).', '1614 - 1592 = 22 years.', 'The ANSWER provided is 24, which does not match the calculation based on the CONTEXT, which should be 22 years.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many field goals between 20 and 30 yards were made?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nIn week 6, the Lions hosted the NFC West Division-leading San Francisco 49ers. The Lions struck first, when Jason Hanson kicked a 25-yard field goal that came after a San Francisco turnover. Detroit added to their lead when Brandon Pettigrew caught a 16-yard TD pass. In the second quarter, the 49ers finally got on the board with a 1-yard TD run by Frank Gore. San Francisco received a safety when Aldon Smith sacked Matthew Stafford in the end zone. The final points of the first half came just before intermission when David Akers of the 49ers kicked a 55-yard field goal, putting the Lions down at halftime for the fourth consecutive week. After the break, Detroit scored on a 24-yard field goal. San Francisco responded with a field goal of their own, this one from 31 yards out. In the fourth quarter, the Lions' Nate Burleson caught a 5-yard TD pass; the Lions went for a 2-point conversion but Calvin Johnson failed to catch Matthew Stafford's pass. In the final 2 minutes, the 49ers rallied from behind, first with a 6-yard TD catch by Delanie Walker, then a 37-yard field goal by David Akers, putting them up 25-19. With 1:02 left in the game, the Lions attempted another comeback, but San Francisco's defense held them off, handing Detroit its first loss of the season as the team fell to 5-1 and 2nd place in the NFC North. After the game, coaches Jim Schwartz and Jim Harbaugh got into an argument after Schwartz claimed Harbaugh pushed him out of the way when the two coaches were shaking hands.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n3\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context mentions two specific field goals between 20 and 30 yards: one by Jason Hanson (25 yards) and another by Detroit after the break (24 yards).', 'No other field goals within the 20-30 yard range are mentioned in the context.', 'The field goals by David Akers (55 yards and 37 yards) and the one by San Francisco (31 yards) are all outside the 20-30 yard range.', 'Therefore, only two field goals between 20 and 30 yards were made, not three as stated in the answer.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich group from the census is smaller: German or Italian?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nGerman\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks which group from the census is smaller: German or Italian.', 'The context provides specific percentages for the ancestry of the population: 22.5% were of German ancestry and 9.8% were of Italian ancestry.', 'From the percentages given, the Italian group (9.8%) is smaller than the German group (22.5%).', \"The answer provided is 'German', which incorrectly identifies the German group as the smaller one.\", \"The correct answer should be 'Italian' based on the percentages provided in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many percent were not Italian?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nAs of the census of 2000, there were 218,590 people, 79,667 households, and 60,387 families residing in the county. The population density was 496 people per square mile (192/km²). There were 83,146 housing units at an average density of 189 per square mile (73/km²). The racial makeup of the county was 86.77% Race (United States Census), 9.27% Race (United States Census), 0.23% Race (United States Census), 1.52% Race (United States Census), 0.06% Race (United States Census), 0.69% from Race (United States Census), and 1.47% from two or more races. 1.91% of the population were Race (United States Census) or Race (United States Census) of any race. 22.5% were of German people, 13.1% Irish people, 9.8% Italian people, 9.2% English, 8.1% \"American\" and 6.0% Polish ancestry.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n89.8\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the percentage of the population that were not Italian.', 'From the context, it is stated that 9.8% of the population were of Italian ancestry.', 'To find the percentage of the population that were not Italian, one would subtract the percentage of Italian ancestry from 100%.', '100% - 9.8% = 90.2%.', 'The answer provided is 89.8%, which does not match the calculated value of 90.2%.', 'Therefore, the answer is not faithful to the context because it does not accurately reflect the subtraction of the Italian percentage from the total population.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat was burned first: city of Ryazan or suburbs of Moscow?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\n1564: The city of Ryazan posad was burned.:47 1571: Russo-Crimean War 1572: Battle of Molodi 1591: Raid reaches Moscow. :116 1591: Artillery stops a raid at Kolomenskoy on the Bank Line. :52 1592: Suburbs of Moscow burned. Russian troops were away fighting Sweden.:17 1598: Crimeans stopped by Bank Line, withdraw and sue for peace.:46 1614: Nogai raids within sight of Moscow. During the Time of Troubles so many captives were taken that the price of a slave at Kaffa dropped to fifteen or twenty gold pieces.:66 1618: Nogais release 15,000 captives in peace treaty with Moscow. 1632: Force from Livny ambushed by Tatars and Janissaries. 300 killed and the rest enslaved.:67 1632: 20,000 Tatars raid the south, as troops were shifted north for the Smolensk War.:76 1633: 30,000 Tatars cross Abatis and Bank lines. Thousands were captured from Oka region.:76 This was the last deep raid into Muscovy. :26 1635: Many small war parties invaded Russia south of Ryazan.:79 1637,41-43: Several raids were led by Nogais and Crimean nobles without permission of Khan.:90 1643: 600 Tatars and 200 Zaporozhian Cossacks raid Kozlov. 19 were killed, and 262 were captured.:23 1644: 20,000 The Tatars raid southern Muscovy, 10,000 captives.:91 1645: A raid captures 6,000 captives. It is claimed that the Turks encouraged these raids to obtain galley slaves for a war with Venice.:91\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\nsuburbs of Moscow\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks which was burned first between the city of Ryazan and the suburbs of Moscow.', 'The context provides specific years when each event occurred: Ryazan was burned in 1564, and the suburbs of Moscow were burned in 1592.', 'Based on the chronological information, Ryazan was burned before the suburbs of Moscow.', \"The answer 'suburbs of Moscow' incorrectly identifies the suburbs of Moscow as being burned first, which is not supported by the timeline given in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Given the following question, document, and answer, you must analyze the provided answer and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the document. The answer must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the document. The answer also must not contradict information provided in the document. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the document and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the document. Show your reasoning.\n\n--\nUSER INPUT (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many games had the Bills won before this game?\n\n--\nBACKGROUND:\nTrying to snap a two-game skid, the Bills flew to Gillette Stadium for a Week 3 divisional fight with the New England Patriots. In the first quarter, QB J. P. Losman was immediately injured on the first offensive play of the game. He would finish the series, but ended up on the bench for the rest of the game. After New England took the lead with kicker Stephen Gostkowski's 24-yard field goal, rookie QB Trent Edwards played the rest of the game for Buffalo. The Bills would get their only score of the game as RB Marshawn Lynch got an 8-yard TD run, and a Rian Lindell extra point put the Bills ahead surprisingly 7-3. However, in the second quarter, the Patriots were able to open up their running game when Bills rookie standout Paul Posluszny was lost due to a broken arm. This left passing lanes open, and for the rest of the game, the Patriots dominated. QB Tom Brady's 8-yard TD pass to TE Benjamin Watson and a 3-yard TD pass to WR Randy Moss made it 17-7 at the half. In the third quarter, New England continued its conquest with Brady's 4-yard TD pass to WR Jabar Gaffney and RB Sammy Morris' 4-yard TD run. In the fourth quarter, the Patriots ended the day with Brady and Moss hooking up with each other again on a 45-yard TD pass.\n\n--\nMODEL OUTPUT:\n1\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\" and \"SCORE\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>}\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The context describes the Bills trying to snap a two-game skid, indicating they had lost their previous two games.', 'The context does not provide any information about the total number of games the Bills had won before this particular game against the Patriots.', \"The answer '1' suggests that the Bills had won one game before this game, but there is no information in the context to support this specific number of wins.\", 'The context only indicates the Bills were in a losing streak, but does not specify the total number of games they had won in the season before this losing streak began.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL}\n", "role": "assistant" } ]