File size: 120,954 Bytes
6fa4bc9 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079 2080 2081 2082 2083 2084 2085 2086 2087 2088 2089 2090 2091 2092 2093 2094 2095 2096 2097 2098 2099 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 2132 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 2150 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 2201 2202 2203 2204 2205 2206 2207 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 2217 2218 2219 2220 2221 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 2280 2281 2282 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 2343 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 2365 2366 2367 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 2380 2381 2382 2383 2384 2385 |
{
"paper_id": "I13-1011",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T07:15:03.795200Z"
},
"title": "Introducing the Prague Discourse Treebank 1.0",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lucie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Charles University",
"location": {
"settlement": "Prague"
}
},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Ji\u0159\u00ed",
"middle": [],
"last": "M\u00edrovsk\u00fd",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Charles University",
"location": {
"settlement": "Prague"
}
},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Anna",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nedoluzhko",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Charles University",
"location": {
"settlement": "Prague"
}
},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Pavl\u00edna",
"middle": [],
"last": "J\u00ednov\u00e1",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Charles University",
"location": {
"settlement": "Prague"
}
},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "\u0160\u00e1rka",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zik\u00e1nov\u00e1",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Charles University",
"location": {
"settlement": "Prague"
}
},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Eva",
"middle": [],
"last": "Haji\u010dov\u00e1",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Charles University",
"location": {
"settlement": "Prague"
}
},
"email": ""
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "We present the Prague Discourse Treebank 1.0, a collection of Czech texts annotated for various discourse-related phenomena \"beyond the sentence boundary\". The treebank contains manual annotations of (1), discourse connectives, their arguments and senses, (2), textual coreference, and (3), bridging anaphora, all carried out on 50k sentences of the treebank. Contrary to most similar projects, the annotation was performed directly on top of syntactic trees (from the previous project of the Prague Dependency Treebank 2.5), benefiting thus from the linguistic information already existing on the same data. In this article, we present our theoretical background, describe the annotations in detail, and offer evaluation numbers and corpus statistics.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "I13-1011",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "We present the Prague Discourse Treebank 1.0, a collection of Czech texts annotated for various discourse-related phenomena \"beyond the sentence boundary\". The treebank contains manual annotations of (1), discourse connectives, their arguments and senses, (2), textual coreference, and (3), bridging anaphora, all carried out on 50k sentences of the treebank. Contrary to most similar projects, the annotation was performed directly on top of syntactic trees (from the previous project of the Prague Dependency Treebank 2.5), benefiting thus from the linguistic information already existing on the same data. In this article, we present our theoretical background, describe the annotations in detail, and offer evaluation numbers and corpus statistics.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Large collections of gold standard language data are known to build an indispensable base for many NLP algorithms. Reliable morphological tagging and syntactic analysis (phrasal or dependency) are nowadays quite a standard information in language corpora released all over the world. With the gradually increasing interest in modeling discourse structure or using various discourse features 1 in different NLP tasks (anaphora resolution, summarization, MT), also the development of resources aimed at representing various discourse-related aspects has gained on importance. Moreover, both theoretical discourse research and NLP algorithms can benefit from a reliable multi-dimensional analysis of the data (Webber et al., 2003 , Stede, 2004 . There are already several elaborate theoretical concepts on discourse coherence brought to life in real-data annotation (see Sections 1.1 and 1.2). Still, it is only in recent years that large-scale corpora with manual annotations of sentential and discourse level phenomena have become available. Even fewer such corpora exist that combine more types of manual discourse-level annotations.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 706,
"end": 726,
"text": "(Webber et al., 2003",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 727,
"end": 740,
"text": ", Stede, 2004",
"ref_id": "BIBREF42"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction and Motivation",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "In this paper, we present a large-scale manual annotation project for Czech in which, apart from the \"standard\" analysis of a sentence (morphology, synctactic trees), several discourse phenomena are marked, all over the same data: pronominal, nominal and zero 2 coreference, discourse connectives (henceforth DCs) and the semantic relations they express, and the associative relations of the so-called bridging anaphora.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction and Motivation",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "The paper is structured as follows: In Sections 1.1 and 1.2, brief overviews of recent projects concerning discourse relations and coreference + bridging anaphora are described, respectively. In Section 2, data and tools used in Prague Discourse Treebank (PDiT) are introduced. Section 3 describes the annotation scenario and is followed by evaluation of the project in comparison with similar projects (Section 4) and basic distribution numbers (Section 5). We conclude with discussion (Section 6).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction and Motivation",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "The first attempts in representing discourse structure date over a decade back. One of very first and most influential projects was the RST-Treebank (Carlson et al., 2001) , an annotation project over the English texts of Wall Street Journal. In accordance with the Rhetorical Structure Theory of Mann and Thompson (1988) , the whole document is represented as a single tree-like structure. Wolf and Gibson (2005) propose a less con-strained model in Discourse Graphbank by giving up the requirement of a tree-structure. These approaches are referred to as \"deep discourse parsing\" or modeling of global coherence (whole document = one connected structure) in contrast to the so-called \"shallow discourse parsing\" or local coherence modeling of the lexically grounded approaches, which are based on identification of discourse markers and relations they express. The most influential of the latter is the Penn Discourse Treebank (for English, PDTB, Prasad et. al., 2008) with several subsequent similarly aimed corpora for different languages, the project presented here being one of them.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 149,
"end": 171,
"text": "(Carlson et al., 2001)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
},
{
"start": 297,
"end": 321,
"text": "Mann and Thompson (1988)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF19"
},
{
"start": 391,
"end": 413,
"text": "Wolf and Gibson (2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF45"
},
{
"start": 949,
"end": 970,
"text": "Prasad et. al., 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF38"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Corpora of Discourse Relations",
"sec_num": "1.1"
},
{
"text": "Resources manually annotated for (some type of) discourse phenomena are already available or work-in-progress for various languages, including Chinese (Zhou and Xue, 2012) , Arabic (Al-Saif and Markert, 2010), Turkish (Zeyrek et al., 2010) , Hindi (Oza et al., 2009) , French (Afantenos et al., 2012 , Danlos et al., 2012 , German (Stede, 2004 , Gastel et al., 2011 and others. Additionally, the relevance of the PDTB annotation concept was further tested on specific domains, e.g. on spoken dialogs (Italian, Tonelli et al., 2010) and on biomedical texts (English, Prasad et al., 2011) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 151,
"end": 171,
"text": "(Zhou and Xue, 2012)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF47"
},
{
"start": 218,
"end": 239,
"text": "(Zeyrek et al., 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF46"
},
{
"start": 248,
"end": 266,
"text": "(Oza et al., 2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF27"
},
{
"start": 276,
"end": 299,
"text": "(Afantenos et al., 2012",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 300,
"end": 321,
"text": ", Danlos et al., 2012",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
},
{
"start": 331,
"end": 343,
"text": "(Stede, 2004",
"ref_id": "BIBREF42"
},
{
"start": 344,
"end": 365,
"text": ", Gastel et al., 2011",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
},
{
"start": 510,
"end": 531,
"text": "Tonelli et al., 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF43"
},
{
"start": 566,
"end": 586,
"text": "Prasad et al., 2011)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF39"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Corpora of Discourse Relations",
"sec_num": "1.1"
},
{
"text": "There is a number of different large-scale annotated corpora for coreference and anaphoric relations. The largest annotated corpora for English include MUC (Hirschman and Chinchor, 1997) , ACE (Doddington et al., 2004) , OntoNotes (Pradhan et al., 2007) , GNOME (Poesio, 2004) , AR-RAU (Poesio and Artstein, 2008) . The coreference annotations for other languages than English are more limited. The most well-known corpora including anaphoric information are AnCora (Recasens and Mart\u00ed, 2009) for Spanish and Catalan, VENEX (Poesio et al., 2004a) for spoken and written Italian, the Italian Live Memories Corpus (Rodr\u00edguez et al., 2010) , T\u00fcBA-D/Z (Hinrichs et al., 2004) and Postdam Commentary Corpus (Stede, 2004, Krasavina and Chiarcos, 2007) for German, and some others. Early work on bridging relations dates back to the mid-70s. Clark (1975) documents several ways in which an inference is needed to understand the meaning intended by the speaker. Clark names several types of bridging relations such as set-membership, part-whole, roles, reasons and consequences. Bridging relations have been later investigated by Poesio et al. (1997 Poesio et al. ( , 2004b . The annotation of bridging relations in different projects includes different types of relations. In the GNOME corpus (Poesio, 2004) , such bridging relations as set-membership, subset, and partwhole are annotated. The Copenhagen Dependency Treebank (Korzen and Buch-Kromann, 2011) has a very detailed annotation scheme based on general semantic roles. Another way to capture bridging relations is to define them vaguely, e.g. as a reference which is made to a subpart of an object that has already been mentioned in the discourse (Hendrickx et al., 2011) or to mark as bridging all non-coreferent anaphoric references. The last approach was used in Hou et al. (2013) , providing a reasonably sized and reliably annotated corpus for English.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 156,
"end": 186,
"text": "(Hirschman and Chinchor, 1997)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
},
{
"start": 193,
"end": 218,
"text": "(Doddington et al., 2004)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
},
{
"start": 231,
"end": 253,
"text": "(Pradhan et al., 2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF36"
},
{
"start": 262,
"end": 276,
"text": "(Poesio, 2004)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
},
{
"start": 286,
"end": 313,
"text": "(Poesio and Artstein, 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
},
{
"start": 466,
"end": 492,
"text": "(Recasens and Mart\u00ed, 2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF40"
},
{
"start": 524,
"end": 546,
"text": "(Poesio et al., 2004a)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF31"
},
{
"start": 612,
"end": 636,
"text": "(Rodr\u00edguez et al., 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF41"
},
{
"start": 648,
"end": 671,
"text": "(Hinrichs et al., 2004)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 702,
"end": 729,
"text": "(Stede, 2004, Krasavina and",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 730,
"end": 745,
"text": "Chiarcos, 2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
},
{
"start": 835,
"end": 847,
"text": "Clark (1975)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
},
{
"start": 1122,
"end": 1141,
"text": "Poesio et al. (1997",
"ref_id": "BIBREF29"
},
{
"start": 1142,
"end": 1165,
"text": "Poesio et al. ( , 2004b",
"ref_id": "BIBREF32"
},
{
"start": 1286,
"end": 1300,
"text": "(Poesio, 2004)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
},
{
"start": 1699,
"end": 1723,
"text": "(Hendrickx et al., 2011)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 1818,
"end": 1835,
"text": "Hou et al. (2013)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF13"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Corpora of Coreference and Bridging Relations",
"sec_num": "1.2"
},
{
"text": "To our knowledge, there are only few corpus projects portraying phenomena \"beyond the sentence boundary\" that gather different types of textual information, or, in other words, offer some kind of multi-dimensional discourse annotation. The texts of Wall Street Journal have undergone various annotations but they arose within different projects and frameworks -rhet- orical structure analysis in RST-Treebank (385 WSJ articles), Discourse Graphbank (135 texts from AP Newswire and WSJ), Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0 (2,159 WSJ articles), OntoNotes (a substantial portion of the WSJ-Penn Treebank annotated for coreference) etc. A multi-dimensional analysis within a single project was conducted for French in AnnoDis (Afantenos et al. 2012 , an intersection of all annotations on 13 articles), for German in the Potsdam Commentary Corpus (Stede, 2004, 170 texts) , and lately in T\u00fcBa-D/Z (Gastel et al., 2011 , 919 sentences in 31 articles). These projects include inter alia some particular version of a \"global\" discourse analysis, annotation of connectives and their senses, and coreference annotation.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 716,
"end": 738,
"text": "(Afantenos et al. 2012",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 837,
"end": 861,
"text": "(Stede, 2004, 170 texts)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 887,
"end": 907,
"text": "(Gastel et al., 2011",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Corpora of Coreference and Bridging Relations",
"sec_num": "1.2"
},
{
"text": "As the base data for the annotation, we used the Prague Dependency Treebank 2.5 (PDT, Bej\u010dek et al., 2012) , which is an update of the Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0 (Haji\u010d et al., 2006) . It is a treebank of almost 50 thousand sentences of Czech newspaper texts, annotated manually on three levels of annotation: morphological, analytical and tectogrammatical. The annotation of a sentence at the highest, tectogrammatical layer captures the deep syntax and the information structure of a sentence and is represented by a dependency tree. For the annotation of discourse relations, textual coreference and bridging anaphora, we used several extensions to a highly customizable tree editor TrEd (Pajas and \u0160t\u011bp\u00e1nek, 2008) . Technically, each of the annotated relations is represented as an arrow connecting two tectogrammatical nodes. The two nodes represent the two arguments of the relation, i.e. typically the subtrees of the nodes. All information about the relation is kept in a set of dedicated attributes at the initial node of the relation, containing a unique identifier of the target node of the relation, type of the relation, and other pieces of information (depending on the relation, e.g. a connective for the discourse relation). The relation is depicted as a curved arrow between the nodes, see Figure 1 . For details on the annotation tool for discourse, see M\u00edrovsk\u00fd et al. (2010a) , for details on the annotation tool for textual coreference and bridging anaphora, see M\u00edrovsk\u00fd et al. (2010b) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 86,
"end": 106,
"text": "Bej\u010dek et al., 2012)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 166,
"end": 186,
"text": "(Haji\u010d et al., 2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF8"
},
{
"start": 695,
"end": 721,
"text": "(Pajas and \u0160t\u011bp\u00e1nek, 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF28"
},
{
"start": 1376,
"end": 1399,
"text": "M\u00edrovsk\u00fd et al. (2010a)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF22"
},
{
"start": 1488,
"end": 1511,
"text": "M\u00edrovsk\u00fd et al. (2010b)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF23"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 1311,
"end": 1319,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Data and Tools",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "The following subsections 3.1 and 3.2 describe the annotation principles for the two subprojects in PDiT, the annotation of discourse relations and the annotation of textual coreference and bridging anaphora. Detailed descriptions of the annotation guidelines can be found in annotation manuals , Nedoluzhko et al., 2011 . Figure 1 shows the annotation of two sentences in Example 1 in all these aspects.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 295,
"end": 320,
"text": ", Nedoluzhko et al., 2011",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 323,
"end": 331,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "(1) Zato lond\u00fdnsk\u00e1 Chelsea je velkou nezn\u00e1mou nejen pro Viktorii \u017di\u017ekov. Podle zpr\u00e1v v\u0161ak anglick\u00fd klub upou\u0161t\u00ed od typick\u00e9ho ostrovn\u00edho fotbalu, co\u017e by mohlo b\u00fdt v\u00fdhodou.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "But then London Chelsea is a big unknown not only for Victoria \u017di\u017ekov. According to reports, however, the English club abandons the typical island football, which could be an advantage.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "Annotating discourse relations in PDiT is inspired by the PDTB lexical approach of connective identification (Prasad et. al., 2008) but it also takes advantage of the Prague tradition of dependency treebanking. This means in practice that some discourse information (intra-sentential) could have been extracted from the previous rich annotation of syntax, with only minor enhancements Table 1 : Distribution of discourse types in the data takes two discourse units as its arguments. Only discourse relations connecting clausal arguments (with a predicate verb), i.e. not those between nominalizations or deictic expressions were annotated in version 1.0. Additionally, the Prague discourse annotation includes marking of list structures (as a separate type of discourse structure) and marking of some smaller text phenomena: article headings, figure captions, non-coherent texts like collections of news etc. The annotation of discourse relations consisted of two phases, first being manual and the subsequent including automatic extraction of relevant syntactic features. For the manual part, the annotators had at their disposal both plain text and the tree structures, the annotation itself was carried out on syntactic (tectogrammatical) dependency trees, as we did not want to lose connection with and information from the analyses of previous levels. Intra-sentential discourse relations, i.e. those that had already been captured within the syntactic (tectogrammatical) analysis, were only to be newly annotated if their discourse semantics differed from the tectogrammatical interpretation , otherwise they were automatically extracted and mapped onto the discourse annotation.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 109,
"end": 131,
"text": "(Prasad et. al., 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF38"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 385,
"end": 392,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Discourse",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "An automatic procedure was designed to extract discourse-relevant features from the syntactic level of description, i.e. the intra-sentential discourse relations. As mentioned earlier, the tectogrammatical tree structures offer some types of information that can be transferred to the discourse-level annotation. In general, this concerns subordinate syntactic relations between clauses with labels like causality, conditionality, temporality, concession etc.; and coordinate syntactic relations between clauses of one sentence with selected coordinative labels like conjunction, disjunction, opposition or contrast, confrontation etc. These relations were semi-automatically mapped onto the discourse annotation. .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Automatic Extraction of Syntactic Features",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The Prague discourse label set was inspired by the tectogrammatical functors (Mikulov\u00e1 et al., 2005) and also by Penn sense tag hierarchy (Miltsakaki et al., 2008) . Table 1 shows the discourse-semantic label set used for PDiT 1.0. The four main semantic classes, Temporal, Contingency, Contrast (Comparison) and Expansion are identical to those in PDTB but the hierarchy it-self is only two-level. The third level is captured by the direction of the discourse arrow. The annotators, unlike in the Penn approach, were not allowed to only assign the major class, they always had to decide for a single relation within one of the classes. 4 Within these four classes, the types of the relations partly differ from the Penn types and go closer to Prague tectogrammatical functors and/or are a matter of language-specific distinctions. Compared to the PDTB label set, we added the categories of purpose and explication in the Contingency group and restrictive opposition and gradation to the Contrast group. In the PDTB, four pragmatic meanings are distinguished and annotated: pragmatic cause, condition, contrast and concession. In the Prague scenario, three pragmatic senses were annotated, pragmatic concession and pragmatic contrast joined to one group, for the lack of reliable distinctive features. 5",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 77,
"end": 100,
"text": "(Mikulov\u00e1 et al., 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF20"
},
{
"start": 138,
"end": 163,
"text": "(Miltsakaki et al., 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
},
{
"start": 637,
"end": 638,
"text": "4",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 166,
"end": 173,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Semantic labels",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "After the manual annotation of discourse relations was finished, some checks turned up to be necessary, especially for relations whose nature revealed to be more complicated in real data than we had expected on the basis of linguistic handbooks. After having collected all examples of these relations (namely specification, explication, generalization, exemplification and equivalence) in our data and established more complex definitions of their nature, annotation of these relations was manually unified in the whole data. Also some DCs required unification via post-annotation. Additionally, the part of the data which was annotated first was fully re-annotated at the end since we expected it might have suffered from initial inexperience of the annotators.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Post-annotation checks and fixes",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Results of the automatic extraction were checked randomly on several hundreds of examples. All discrepancies found were integrated in an automatic script (treatment of multiple DCs, multiple coordinations etc.). Only two situations required manual checks and fixes: i) Due to a complicated situation in a tree, the automatic extraction failed in 23 cases of DC identification (opposed to 10,482 cases with correct identification). ii) Solely manual treatment was necessary for constructions with a discourse-relevant clause dependent on a complex predicate structure with an infinitive or a noun phrase. In such cases only semantics allowed to distinguish if the clause is related to the whole structure or only to the infinitive or noun phrase. 6",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Post-annotation checks and fixes",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In PDiT 1.0, two types of coreference (grammatical and textual) and six types of bridging relations are marked. The grammatical coreference typically occurs within a single sentence, the antecedent being able to be derived on the basis of grammatical rules of a given language (Czech). It includes relative pronouns, verbs of control, reflexive pronouns, reciprocity and verbal complements (Mikulov\u00e1 et al., 2005) . Textual coreference marks coreferential relations between language expressions referring to the same discourse entity when the reference is not expressed by grammatical means alone, but also via context. Anaphoric (occasionally cataphoric) relations are expressed by various linguistic means (pronouns, synonyms, generalizing nouns etc.). Textual coreference has been annotated in two time periods. First, the so-called pronominal textual coreference was manually annotated. It was restricted to cases in which a demonstrative this or an anaphoric pronoun of the 3rd person, also in its zero form, are used (Ku\u010dov\u00e1 and Haji\u010dov\u00e1, 2004) . Afterwards, the annotation of textual coreference was extended to cases where the anaphoric expression is represented by other means such as full noun phrases, adverbs (there, then etc.) and some types of numerals and pronouns left out during the first stage (Nedoluzhko et al., 2013) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 390,
"end": 413,
"text": "(Mikulov\u00e1 et al., 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF20"
},
{
"start": 1023,
"end": 1050,
"text": "(Ku\u010dov\u00e1 and Haji\u010dov\u00e1, 2004)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF18"
},
{
"start": 1312,
"end": 1337,
"text": "(Nedoluzhko et al., 2013)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Coreference and Bridging Relations",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "The textual coreference is further classified into two types -coreference of noun phrases with specific (type SPEC) or generic (type GEN) reference. Compare examples (2) and (3):",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Coreference and Bridging Relations",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "(2) Mary and John went together to Israel, but Mary [type SPEC] had to return because of the illness.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Coreference and Bridging Relations",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "(3) Dogs bark. This is the way how they [type GEN] express their emotions.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Coreference and Bridging Relations",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "Discourse deixis (reference to a non-nominal antecedent) is annotated as a textual coreference link when referring to a clause or a sentence. If a noun phrase endophorically refers to a discourse segment that is larger than one sentence or it is understood by inferencing from a broader cotext, the antecedent is not specified. 7 6 For more details, see .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 330,
"end": 331,
"text": "6",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Coreference and Bridging Relations",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "A specifically marked link for exophora denotes that the referent is \"out\" of the co-text, it is known only from the actual situation. In the same way as for segments, the new nominal and adverbial links were added.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Coreference and Bridging Relations",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "For the bridging relations, the following types are distinguished: part-of relation (roomceiling), set -subset (students -some students) and FUNCT (trainer -football team) traditional relations, CONTRAST for coherence relevant discourse opposites (e.g. this year -next year), ANAF for explicitly anaphoric relations without coreference (second world war -at that time) and the further underspecified group REST, which is mainly used to capture such types of bridging relations as location -inhabitants or event -argument. A more detailed description of the types can be found in Nedoluzhko and M\u00edrovsk\u00fd (2011).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Coreference and Bridging Relations",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "For the textual coreference, only a limited preannotation was carried out: We used a list of pairs of words that with a high probability form a coreferential pair in texts. Most of the pairs in the list consist of a noun and a derived adjective, which are different in Czech, e.g. Prahapra\u017esk\u00fd (in English: Prague -Prague, like in the sentence: He arrived in Prague and found the Prague atmosphere quite casual). The rest of the list is formed by pairs consisting of an abbreviation and its one-word expansion, e.g. \u010cR -\u010cesko (similarly in English: USA -States). The whole list consists of more than 6 thousand pairs obtained automatically from the morphological synthesizer for Czech, manually checked and slightly extended.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Automatic Preannotation",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Several annotators annotated the data but (for obvious reasons of limited resources) each part of the data has only been annotated by one of them. Only 4% of the data (44 documents, 2,084 sentences) have been annotated in parallel by two annotators of discourse relations, and 3% (39 documents, 1,606 sentences) have been annotated in parallel by two annotators of textual coreference and bridging anaphora. We used the parallel (double) annotations for measuring the inter-annotator agreement, and for analyzing the most common errors, i.e. difficult parts of the annotation.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "To evaluate the inter-annotator agreement on texts annotated in parallel by two annotators, we used several measures. The connective-based F1measure (M\u00edrovsk\u00fd et al., 2010c) was used for measuring the agreement on the recognition of a discourse relation, the chain-based F1-measure was used for measuring the agreement on the recognition of a coreference or bridging relation. A simple ratio and Cohen's \u03ba were used for measuring the agreement on the type of the relations in cases where the annotators recognized the same relation. 8 In the connective-based measure, we consider the annotators to be in agreement on recognizing a discourse relation if the two connectives they mark (each of the connectives marked by one of the annotators) have a non-empty intersection (technically, a connective is a set of tree nodes). For details, see .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 149,
"end": 173,
"text": "(M\u00edrovsk\u00fd et al., 2010c)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF24"
},
{
"start": 533,
"end": 534,
"text": "8",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "In the chain-based measure, we consider the annotators to be in agreement on recognizing a coreference or a bridging relation if two nodes connected by an arrow by one of the annotators have also been connected by the other annotator; coreference chains are taken into account, i.e. it is sufficient for the agreement if the arrow starts in or goes to a node that is coreferentially connected (possibly transitively) with the node used for the relation by the other annotator. Table 2 shows the results of the inter-annotator agreement measurements. Comparison of the inter-annotator agreement with other similar projects is difficult, as the projects usually use different annotation schemes and different scores. Nevertheless, some comparisons can be done: The simple ratio agreement on types in discourse relations (0.77 on all parallel data, the third column of Table 2 ) is the closest measure to the way of measuring the inter-annotator agreement used on subsenses in the Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0, reported in Prasad et al. (2008) . Their agreement was 0.8.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 1019,
"end": 1039,
"text": "Prasad et al. (2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF38"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 477,
"end": 484,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
},
{
"start": 866,
"end": 873,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "In the annotation of coreference relations in OntoNotes, the inter-annotator agreement on English was 80.9 for newspaper texts and 78.4 for magazine texts. On Chinese, the agreement was 73.6 for newspaper texts and 74.9 for magazine texts (reported in Pradhan et al. 2012) . These numbers can be compared with our chainbased F1 measure (0.72 in the second column of Table 2), as it is similar to the MUC-6 score they used.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 252,
"end": 272,
"text": "Pradhan et al. 2012)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF37"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "As to the bridging anaphora, we can compare our chain-based F1 score (0.46 in the second column of Table 2 ) to F1 score on recognition of bridging relations reported for the annotation of the COREA corpus (Dutch texts); their agreement on newspaper texts was 0.39 (reported in Hendrickx et al., 2011) . In addition to the numbers in Table 3 , there have been annotated 445 members of lists, 4,188 headings, 1,505 coreference relations to segment and 689 references out of the text (exophora). Table 4 shows a distribution of bridging types annotated in PDiT. ",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 278,
"end": 301,
"text": "Hendrickx et al., 2011)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 99,
"end": 106,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
},
{
"start": 334,
"end": 341,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": "TABREF3"
},
{
"start": 494,
"end": 501,
"text": "Table 4",
"ref_id": "TABREF5"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "In the first release of PDiT, the annotation of discourse relations is limited to relations expressed by explicit DCs (coordinating conjunctions, particles, adverbs etc.), other tags between adjacent sentences were not inserted, unlike in some similar projects. Alternative lexicalizations (AltLex) are not annotated in PDiT, their thorough analysis is a recent work in progress. Entity-based relations (EntRel) are, in our view, a matter of coreference and bridging annotation.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Discussion",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "Annotation of implicit connectives has been in all known attempts a problematic task, as the IAA numbers are rather low. For implicit connectives (not present on the surface, a DC must be \"inferred\" from the context), we conducted an experimental annotation of 100 sentences, trying to remove factors known as repeatedly disturbing. 11 The annotators agreed in 49% on type of the relation. If only the distinction between any discourse relation on one side and coref + bridging relation on the other side was taken into consideration, the agreement was slightly higher -58%. The most problematic issue revealed to be distinguishing between elaborative relations and relations based only on coreference. The restriction of the annotation only to slots between adjacent sentences was found useful for simplifying the annotation but it did not always match the annotators' intuition where the argument borders should be (e.g. if only the sentence-last dependent clause relates to the following sentence). Although the annotators were able to agree in most cases after discussion, the results convinced us to reconsider the annotation setting for implicit DCs before any future annotation.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 333,
"end": 335,
"text": "11",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Implicit connectives",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Another phenomenon not present in PDiT in comparison with PDTB is attribution. We believe that this information can be at least partially obtained from syntactic features of the syntactic layers of PDT (e.g. attributes for direct speech, parentheses, verbal valency etc.).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Implicit connectives",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We described the Prague Discourse Treebank 1.0, PDiT 1.0, a large collection of Czech texts that offers a rare combination of manual annotations of discourse relations, textual coreference and bridging anaphora. PDiT 1.0 is an extension of PDT 2.5 and all the annotation presented in this paper was carried out on the dependency trees of the tectogrammatical (deep syntax) layer. It was released in November 2012 under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and it is available at the LINDAT-Clarin repository 12 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "Recently, we focus on extensions of the annotation for the upcoming release of PDT 3.0. A genre classification of the corpus texts for the purposes of data clustering in automatic experiments has been finished. Annotation of alternative lexicalizations (AltLex) and anaphoric expressions of 1st and 2nd person are in progress.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "P406/12/0658 and P406/2010/0875), the LIND-AT-Clarin project (LM2010013) and SVV of the Charles University (267 314).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "The term of discourse in this paper is used in two meanings. The broader interpretation is roughly equal to text (as in discourse structure, discourse features or discourse coherence) whereas the narrower sense denotes semantic relations between propositions (as in discourse relations).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Czech is a pro-drop language. The restored ellipses in the underlying sentence analysis allow us to annotate zero forms as co-referential.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Some remarks on annotation of the implicit DCs and of the so-called alternative lexicalizations of connectives (AltLex) are added in the discussion in Section 6.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In special cases, they had the option to assign an additional secondary relation.5 It may be that different text types require slightly different sets of semantic labels. For instance, some discourse projects use a more fine-grained set of pragmatic senses (e.g. for spoken dialogs).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "This decision is considered to be provisional. The antecedents are supposed to be specified in further phases of the annotation.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In all our measurements, only inter-sentential discourse relations have been counted, as the intra-sentential relations were mostly annotated automatically.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Please note that 1/10 if the PDT/PDiT data has been designated to evaluation tests. Numbers presented in this section include also this part of the data. Therefore, these numbers should not be used in any experiments tested on the evaluation test data of PDT/PDiT! 10 mostly annotated already in PDT",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The annotation was carried out by two most experienced annotators, the chosen text types were from an accessible domain (cultural event description), the texts were short, up",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-097C-0000-0008-E130-A",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [
{
"text": "We gratefully acknowledge support from the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (projects n.to 35 sentences each. Another option would be to underspecify the sense hierarchy but we did not do that. Instead, we allowed for labels coref, bridging (=EntRel) and NoRel.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Acknowledgment",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "An empirical resource for discovering cognitive principles of discourse organization: the ANNODIS corpus",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [
"D"
],
"last": "Afantenos",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Asher",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "F",
"middle": [],
"last": "Benamara",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Proceedings of LREC 2012",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "S. D. Afantenos, N. Asher, F. Benamara et al. 2012. An empirical resource for discovering cognitive principles of discourse organization: the ANNODIS corpus. In: Proceedings of LREC 2012, Istanbul, Turkey.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "The Leeds Arabic Discourse Treebank: Annotating discourse connectives for Arabic",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Al-Saif",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Markert",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2046--2053",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "A. Al-Saif, K. Markert. 2010. The Leeds Arabic Dis- course Treebank: Annotating discourse connectives for Arabic. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evalu- ation (LREC 2010), Valletta, Malta, pp. 2046- 2053.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Prague Dependency Treebank 2.5 -a revisited version of PDT 2.0",
"authors": [
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bej\u010dek",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Panevov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Popelka",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "231--246",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "E. Bej\u010dek, J. Panevov\u00e1, J. Popelka et al. 2012. Prague Dependency Treebank 2.5 -a revisited version of PDT 2.0. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2012), Mumbai, India, pp. 231-246.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Carlson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Marcu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Okurowski",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2001,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2nd SIGDIAL Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "L. Carlson, D. Marcu, M. E. Okurowski. 2001. Build- ing a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory. In Proceedings of the 2nd SIGDIAL Workshop on Discourse and Dia- logue, Eurospeech 2001.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Bridging",
"authors": [
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [
"H"
],
"last": "Clark",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1975,
"venue": "The Conference on Theoretical Issues in NLP",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "169--174",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "H. H. Clark. 1975. Bridging. In: The Conference on Theoretical Issues in NLP, pp. 169-174.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "Vers le FDTB: French Discourse Tree Bank In: Actes de la conf\u00e9rence conjointe JEP-TALN-RE-CITAL",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Danlos",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Antolinos-Basso",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [],
"last": "Braud",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "",
"volume": "2",
"issue": "",
"pages": "471--478",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "L. Danlos, D. Antolinos-Basso, C. Braud et al. 2012. Vers le FDTB: French Discourse Tree Bank In: Actes de la conf\u00e9rence conjointe JEP-TALN-RE- CITAL, Grenoble, France, volume 2 : TALN, 2, pp. 471-478.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "The Automatic Content Extraction (ACE) program -tasks, data, and evaluation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Doddington",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mitchell",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Przybocki",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of LREC 2004",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "G. Doddington, A. Mitchell, M. Przybocki et al. 2004. The Automatic Content Extraction (ACE) program -tasks, data, and evaluation. In: Proceedings of LREC 2004, Lisbon.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "Annotation of Explicit and Implicit Discourse Relations in the T\u00fcBa-D/Z Treebank",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gastel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schulze",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Y",
"middle": [],
"last": "Versley",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "Multilingual Resources and Multilingual Applications, Proceedings of the German Society of Computational Linguistics and Language Technology (GSCL) 2011. Hamburg",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "99--104",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "A. Gastel, S. Schulze, Y. Versley et al. 2011. Annota- tion of Explicit and Implicit Discourse Relations in the T\u00fcBa-D/Z Treebank. In: Multilingual Re- sources and Multilingual Applications, Proceed- ings of the German Society of Computational Lin- guistics and Language Technology (GSCL) 2011. Hamburg, pp. 99-104.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0. Software prototype, Linguistic Data Consortium",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Haji\u010d",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Panevov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Haji\u010dov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "J. Haji\u010d, J. Panevov\u00e1, E. Haji\u010dov\u00e1 et al. 2006. Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0. Software prototype, Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA, USA, ISBN 1-58563-370-4, http://www.ldc.upen- n.edu, Jul 2006.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Analysis and Reference Resolution of Bridge Anaphora across Different Text Genres",
"authors": [
{
"first": "I",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hendrickx",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "O",
"middle": [],
"last": "De Clercq",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "V",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hoste",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "Anaphora Processing and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science",
"volume": "7099",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--11",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "I. Hendrickx, O. De Clercq, V. Hoste. 2011. Analysis and Reference Resolution of Bridge Anaphora across Different Text Genres. In: Anaphora Pro- cessing and Applications. Lecture Notes in Com- puter Science Volume 7099, pp. 1-11.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Recent developments in linguistic annotations of the T\u00fcBa-D/Z treebank",
"authors": [
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Naumann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "K. Naumann et al. 2004. Re- cent developments in linguistic annotations of the T\u00fcBa-D/Z treebank. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories. T\u00fcbingen.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "MUC-7 Coreference Task Definition -Version",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hirschman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chinchor",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1997,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "L. Hirschman, N. Chinchor. 1997. MUC-7 Corefer- ence Task Definition -Version 3.0.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "Integrating semantics and saliences for brodging resolution using Markov logic",
"authors": [
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hou",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Markert",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Strube",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "NAACL 2013 to appear",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hou, K. Markert, M. Strube. 2013. Integrating se- mantics and saliences for brodging resolution using Markov logic. In NAACL 2013 to appear.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Analyzing the Most Common Errors in the Discourse Annotation of the Prague Dependency Treebank",
"authors": [
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "J\u00ednov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "M\u00edrovsk\u00fd",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 11)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "P. J\u00ednov\u00e1, J. M\u00edrovsk\u00fd, L. Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1. 2012a. Analyz- ing the Most Common Errors in the Discourse An- notation of the Prague Dependency Treebank. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 11), Lisbon, Portugal, November 2012.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Semi-Automatic Annotation of Intra-sentential Discourse Relations in PDT",
"authors": [
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "J\u00ednov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "M\u00edrovsk\u00fd",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 24 th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2012), ADACA Discourse Workshop",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "P. J\u00ednov\u00e1, J. M\u00edrovsk\u00fd, L. Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1. 2012b. Semi- Automatic Annotation of Intra-sentential Discourse Relations in PDT. In: Proceedings of the 24 th Inter- national Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2012), ADACA Discourse Workshop, Mumbai, India, December 2012.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "Anaphoric relations in the Copenhagen dependency treebanks",
"authors": [
{
"first": "I",
"middle": [],
"last": "Korzen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Buch-Kromann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "Beyond Semantics: Corpus-based Investigations of Pragmatic and Discourse Phenomena. DGfS Workshop",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "83--98",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "I. Korzen, M. Buch-Kromann. 2011. Anaphoric rela- tions in the Copenhagen dependency treebanks. In: Beyond Semantics: Corpus-based Investigations of Pragmatic and Discourse Phenomena. DGfS Workshop, pp. 83-98.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "PoCoS -Potsdam Coreference Scheme",
"authors": [
{
"first": "O",
"middle": [],
"last": "Krasavina",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ch",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chiarcos",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "O. Krasavina, Ch. Chiarcos. 2007. PoCoS -Potsdam Coreference Scheme. In Proceedings of the Lin- guistic Annotation Workshop, Prague.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "Coreferential Relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ku\u010dov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Haji\u010dov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 5th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium, S. Miguel",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "L. Ku\u010dov\u00e1, E. Haji\u010dov\u00e1. 2004. Coreferential Relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank. In Proceed- ings of the 5th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium, S. Miguel.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "Rhetorical structure theory. Toward a functional theory of text organization",
"authors": [
{
"first": "W",
"middle": [
"C"
],
"last": "Mann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Thompson",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1988,
"venue": "",
"volume": "8",
"issue": "",
"pages": "243--281",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "W.C. Mann, S. A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical struc- ture theory. Toward a functional theory of text or- ganization. In: Text, 8(3):243-281.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "Annotation on the tectogrammatical layer in the Prague Dependency Treebank. The Annotation Guidelines. Prague: UFAL MFF",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mikulov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Mikulov\u00e1 et al. 2005. Annotation on the tecto- grammatical layer in the Prague Dependency Treebank. The Annotation Guidelines. Prague: UFAL MFF. Available at:",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "Sense Annotation in the Penn Discourse Treebank",
"authors": [
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Miltsakaki",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Robaldo",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lee",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "E. Miltsakaki, L. Robaldo, A. Lee et al. 2008. Sense Annotation in the Penn Discourse Treebank. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF22": {
"ref_id": "b22",
"title": "Annotation Tool for Discourse in PDT",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "M\u00edrovsk\u00fd",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mladov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Z",
"middle": [],
"last": "\u017dabokrtsk\u00fd",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "9--12",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "J. M\u00edrovsk\u00fd, L. Mladov\u00e1, Z. \u017dabokrtsk\u00fd. 2010a. An- notation Tool for Discourse in PDT. In: Proceed- ings of the 23rd International Conference on Com- putational Linguistics (Coling 2010), Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China, ISBN 978-7-302- 23456-2, pp. 9-12.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "Annotation Tool for Extended Textual Coreference and Bridging Anaphora",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "M\u00edrovsk\u00fd",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pajas",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nedoluzhko",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "168--171",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "J. M\u00edrovsk\u00fd, P. Pajas, A. Nedoluzhko. 2010b. An- notation Tool for Extended Textual Coreference and Bridging Anaphora. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010), Valletta, Malta, ISBN 2-9517408-6-7, pp. 168-171.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "Connective-Based Measuring of the Inter-Annotator Agreement in the Annotation of Discourse in PDT",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "M\u00edrovsk\u00fd",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mladov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "\u0160",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zik\u00e1nov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "775--781",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "J. M\u00edrovsk\u00fd, L. Mladov\u00e1, \u0160. Zik\u00e1nov\u00e1. 2010c. Con- nective-Based Measuring of the Inter-Annotator Agreement in the Annotation of Discourse in PDT. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Confer- ence on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2010), Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China, pp. 775-781.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF25": {
"ref_id": "b25",
"title": "A Coreferentially annotated Corpus and Anaphora Resolution for Czech",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nedoluzhko",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "M\u00edrovsk\u00fd",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nov\u00e1k",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Papers from the Annual International Conference \"Dialogue 2013",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "A. Nedoluzhko, J. M\u00edrovsk\u00fd, M. Nov\u00e1k. 2013. A Coreferentially annotated Corpus and Anaphora Resolution for Czech. To appear in Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Papers from the Annual International Conference \"Dia- logue 2013\". Moskva.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF26": {
"ref_id": "b26",
"title": "Annotating Extended Textual Coreference and Bridging Relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nedoluzhko",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "M\u00edrovsk\u00fd",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "\u00daFAL MFF UK",
"volume": "69",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "A. Nedoluzhko, J. M\u00edrovsk\u00fd. 2011. Annotating Exten- ded Textual Coreference and Bridging Relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank. Technical re- port no. 2011/44, \u00daFAL MFF UK, Prague, Czech Republic, 69 pp.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF27": {
"ref_id": "b27",
"title": "The Hindi Discourse Relation Bank",
"authors": [
{
"first": "U",
"middle": [],
"last": "Oza",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Prasad",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kolachina",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Proc. Linguistic Annotation Workshop",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "158--161",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "U. Oza, R. Prasad, S. Kolachina et al. 2009. The Hindi Discourse Relation Bank. In: Proc. Linguist- ic Annotation Workshop, pp.158-161.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF28": {
"ref_id": "b28",
"title": "Recent advances in a feature-rich framework for treebank annotation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pajas",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "\u0160t\u011bp\u00e1nek",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "673--680",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "P. Pajas, J. \u0160t\u011bp\u00e1nek. 2008. Recent advances in a fea- ture-rich framework for treebank annotation. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), Manchester, pp. 673-680.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF29": {
"ref_id": "b29",
"title": "Resolving bridging references in unrestricted text",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Poesio",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Vieira",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Teufel",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1997,
"venue": "ACL Workshop on Robust Anaphora Resolution",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--6",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Poesio, R. Vieira, S. Teufel. 1997. Resolving bridging references in unrestricted text. In: ACL Workshop on Robust Anaphora Resolution, pp. 1- 6.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF30": {
"ref_id": "b30",
"title": "The MATE/GNOME Proposals for Anaphoric Annotation, Revisited",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Poesio",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of The 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Poesio. 2004. The MATE/GNOME Proposals for Anaphoric Annotation, Revisited. In: Proceedings of The 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Boston.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF31": {
"ref_id": "b31",
"title": "The Venex corpus of anaphora and deixis in spoken and written Italian",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Poesio",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Delmonte",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bristot",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Poesio, R. Delmonte, A. Bristot et al. 2004a. The Venex corpus of anaphora and deixis in spoken and written Italian. Manuscript.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF32": {
"ref_id": "b32",
"title": "Learning to resolve bridging references",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Poesio",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mehta",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Maroudas",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2004)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "143--150",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Poesio, R. Mehta, A. Maroudas et al. 2004b. Learning to resolve bridging references. In: 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics (ACL 2004), pp. 143-150.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF33": {
"ref_id": "b33",
"title": "Anaphoric annotation in the ARRAU corpus",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Poesio",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Artstein",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Proceedings of LREC 2008",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Poesio, R. Artstein. 2008. Anaphoric annotation in the ARRAU corpus. In Proceedings of LREC 2008, Marrakech.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF34": {
"ref_id": "b34",
"title": "Manual for Annotation of Discourse Relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "J\u00ednov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "\u0160",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zik\u00e1nov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "L. Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1, P. J\u00ednov\u00e1, \u0160. Zik\u00e1nov\u00e1 et al. 2012a. Manual for Annotation of Discourse Relations in the Prague Dependency Treebank. Technical re- port, UFAL MFF UK, Prague, Czech Republic. Available at: http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/techrep/tr47.pdf.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF35": {
"ref_id": "b35",
"title": "Prague Discourse Treebank 1.0. Data/software, \u00daFAL MFF UK",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "J\u00ednov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "\u0160",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zik\u00e1nov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "L. Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1, P. J\u00ednov\u00e1, \u0160. Zik\u00e1nov\u00e1 et al. 2012b. Prague Discourse Treebank 1.0. Data/software, \u00daFAL MFF UK, Prague, Czech Republic, http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/discourse/, Nov 2012.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF36": {
"ref_id": "b36",
"title": "Ontonotes: A unified relational semantic representation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pradhan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hovy",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Marcus",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Computing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "S. Pradhan, E. Hovy, M. Marcus et al. 2007. Onton- otes: A unified relational semantic representation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Computing, Washington DC.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF37": {
"ref_id": "b37",
"title": "CoNLL-2012 Shared Task: Modeling Multilingual Unrestricted Coreference in OntoNotes",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pradhan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Moschitti",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Xue",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "S. Pradhan, A. Moschitti, N. Xue et al. 2012. CoNLL- 2012 Shared Task: Modeling Multilingual Unres- tricted Coreference in OntoNotes. Jeju, South Korea, Jul 2012.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF38": {
"ref_id": "b38",
"title": "The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Prasad",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dinesh",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lee",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2961--2968",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "R. Prasad, N. Dinesh, A. Lee et al. 2008. The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), Marrakech, Mo- rocco, pp. 2961-2968.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF39": {
"ref_id": "b39",
"title": "The Biomedical Discourse Relation Bank",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Prasad",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mcroy",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Nadya",
"middle": [],
"last": "Frid",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "BMC 1",
"volume": "12",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "R. Prasad, S. McRoy, Nadya Frid et al. 2011. The Biomedical Discourse Relation Bank, BMC 1, 12:188",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF40": {
"ref_id": "b40",
"title": "AnCora-CO: Coreferentially annotated corpora for Spanish and Catalan",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Recasens",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Mart\u00ed",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Language Resources and Evaluation",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Recasens, A. M. Mart\u00ed. 2009. AnCora-CO: Core- ferentially annotated corpora for Spanish and Catalan. In: Language Resources and Evaluation.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF41": {
"ref_id": "b41",
"title": "Anaphoric Annotation of Wikipedia and Blogs in the Live Memories Corpus",
"authors": [
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rodr\u00edguez",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "F",
"middle": [],
"last": "Delogu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Y",
"middle": [],
"last": "Versley",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of LREC 2010",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "K. Rodr\u00edguez, F. Delogu, Y. Versley et al. 2010. Ana- phoric Annotation of Wikipedia and Blogs in the Live Memories Corpus. In Proceedings of LREC 2010, Valletta, Malta.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF42": {
"ref_id": "b42",
"title": "The Potsdam Commentary Corpus",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stede",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proc. of the ACL 2004 Workshop on Discourse Annotation",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "96--102",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Stede. 2004. The Potsdam Commentary Corpus. Proc. of the ACL 2004 Workshop on Discourse An- notation, pp. 96-102.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF43": {
"ref_id": "b43",
"title": "Annotation of Discourse Relations for Conversational Spoken Dialogs",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tonelli",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Riccardi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Prasad",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2084--2090",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "S. Tonelli, G. Riccardi, R. Prasad et al. 2010. Annota- tion of Discourse Relations for Conversational Spoken Dialogs. 2010. In Proceedings of the Sev- enth International Conference on Language Re- sources and Evaluation (LREC 2010), pp. 2084- 2090. Valletta, Malta.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF45": {
"ref_id": "b45",
"title": "Representing discourse coherence: A corpus-based study",
"authors": [
{
"first": "F",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wolf",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gibson",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "F. Wolf, E. Gibson. 2005. Representing discourse co- herence: A corpus-based study. Computational Linguistics, 31(2).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF46": {
"ref_id": "b46",
"title": "The Annotation Scheme of the Turkish Discourse Bank and an Evaluation of Inconsistent Annotations",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zeyrek",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "I",
"middle": [],
"last": "Demir\u015fahin",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sevdik-\u00c7alli",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Fourth Linguistic Annotation Workshop",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "282--289",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "D. Zeyrek, I. Demir\u015fahin, A. Sevdik-\u00c7alli et al. 2010. The Annotation Scheme of the Turkish Discourse Bank and an Evaluation of Inconsistent Annota- tions. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Linguistic An- notation Workshop. Pages 282-289. Uppsala, Sweden.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF47": {
"ref_id": "b47",
"title": "PDTB-style Discourse Annotation of Chinese Text",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Y",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhou",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Xue",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "69--77",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Y. Zhou, N. Xue. 2012. PDTB-style Discourse An- notation of Chinese Text. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics. pp. 69-77. Jeju, Republic of Korea. July 2012.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "Annotation of two sentences. Discourse relations are represented by thick orange arrows, textual coreference by dark blue slim arrows, bridging anaphora by light blue slim arrows. Grammatical coreference (the only one in the figure is between nodes co [what] and upou\u0161t\u011bt [to abandon]) is represented by a brown slim arrow.",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"TABREF0": {
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"2\">TEMPORAL CONTINGENCY</td><td>CONTRAST</td><td>EXPANSION</td></tr><tr><td>synchronous</td><td>reason -result</td><td>confrontation</td><td>conjunction</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">asynchronous pragmatic reason -result</td><td>opposition</td><td>exemplification</td></tr><tr><td/><td>condition</td><td>pragmatic contrast</td><td>specification</td></tr><tr><td/><td>pragmatic condition</td><td colspan=\"2\">restrictive opposition equivalence</td></tr><tr><td/><td>explication</td><td>concession</td><td>generalization</td></tr><tr><td/><td>purpose</td><td>correction</td><td>conjunctive alternative</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td>gradation</td><td>disjunctive alternative</td></tr></table>",
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"num": null,
"text": "). In the first release of PDiT, we only focused on discourse relations indicated by overly present (explicit) discourse connectives, i.e. expressions like but, however, as a result, even though etc. 3 Every DC is thought of as a discourse-level predicate that"
},
"TABREF2": {
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"num": null,
"text": "Inter-annotator agreement"
},
"TABREF3": {
"content": "<table><tr><td>relation</td><td>count</td></tr><tr><td>discourse relations</td><td>20,542</td></tr><tr><td>-discourse inter-sentential</td><td>6,195</td></tr><tr><td>-discourse intra-sentential</td><td>14,347</td></tr><tr><td>textual coreference</td><td>87,299</td></tr><tr><td>grammatical coreference 10</td><td>23,272</td></tr><tr><td>bridging anaphora</td><td>33,154</td></tr></table>",
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"num": null,
"text": "shows total numbers of annotated relations in the whole data of PDiT."
},
"TABREF4": {
"content": "<table><tr><td>bridging type</td><td>count</td></tr><tr><td>ANAF</td><td>847</td></tr><tr><td>CONTRAST</td><td>2,305</td></tr><tr><td>FUNCT_P</td><td>516</td></tr><tr><td>PART_WHOLE</td><td>2,017</td></tr><tr><td>P_FUNCT</td><td>1,743</td></tr><tr><td>REST</td><td>2,226</td></tr><tr><td>SET_SUB</td><td>13,106</td></tr><tr><td>SUB_SET</td><td>5,885</td></tr><tr><td>WHOLE_PART</td><td>4,509</td></tr><tr><td>total</td><td>33,154</td></tr></table>",
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"num": null,
"text": "Total numbers of annotated relations in PDiT"
},
"TABREF5": {
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"num": null,
"text": "Distribution of bridging types in PDiT"
},
"TABREF6": {
"content": "<table><tr><td>discourse type</td><td>full name</td><td>count</td></tr><tr><td>conc</td><td>concession</td><td>878</td></tr><tr><td>cond</td><td>condition</td><td>1,369</td></tr><tr><td>confr</td><td>confrontation</td><td>654</td></tr><tr><td>conj</td><td>conjunction</td><td>7,551</td></tr><tr><td>conjalt</td><td>conj. alternative</td><td>90</td></tr><tr><td>corr</td><td>correction</td><td>440</td></tr><tr><td>disjalt</td><td>disj. alternative</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>equiv</td><td>equivalence</td><td>104</td></tr><tr><td>exempl</td><td>exemplification</td><td>142</td></tr><tr><td>explicat</td><td>explication</td><td>225</td></tr><tr><td>f_cond</td><td>pragm. condition</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>f_opp</td><td>pragm. contrast</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>f_reason</td><td>pragm. reason</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>gener</td><td>generalization</td><td>106</td></tr><tr><td>grad</td><td>gradation</td><td>430</td></tr><tr><td>opp</td><td>opposition</td><td>3,209</td></tr><tr><td>preced</td><td>asynchronous</td><td>808</td></tr><tr><td>purp</td><td>purpose</td><td>414</td></tr><tr><td>reason</td><td>reason-result</td><td>2,626</td></tr><tr><td>restr</td><td>restr. opposition</td><td>269</td></tr><tr><td>spec</td><td>specification</td><td>627</td></tr><tr><td>synchr</td><td>synchronous</td><td>222</td></tr><tr><td>other</td><td>other</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>total</td><td/><td>20,542</td></tr></table>",
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"num": null,
"text": "shows the total number of individual discourse types annotated in PDiT."
},
"TABREF7": {
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"num": null,
"text": "Distribution of discourse types in PDiT"
}
}
}
} |