File size: 150,332 Bytes
6fa4bc9 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079 2080 2081 2082 2083 2084 2085 2086 2087 2088 2089 2090 2091 2092 2093 2094 2095 2096 2097 2098 2099 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 2132 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 2150 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 2201 2202 2203 2204 2205 2206 2207 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 2217 2218 2219 2220 2221 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 2280 2281 2282 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 2343 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 2365 2366 2367 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 2380 2381 2382 2383 2384 2385 2386 2387 2388 2389 2390 2391 2392 2393 2394 2395 2396 2397 2398 2399 2400 2401 2402 2403 2404 2405 2406 2407 2408 2409 2410 2411 2412 2413 2414 2415 2416 2417 2418 2419 2420 2421 2422 2423 2424 2425 2426 2427 2428 2429 2430 2431 2432 2433 2434 2435 2436 2437 2438 2439 2440 2441 2442 2443 2444 2445 2446 2447 2448 2449 2450 2451 2452 2453 2454 2455 2456 2457 2458 2459 2460 2461 2462 2463 2464 2465 2466 2467 2468 2469 2470 2471 2472 2473 2474 2475 2476 2477 2478 2479 2480 2481 2482 2483 2484 2485 2486 2487 2488 2489 2490 2491 2492 2493 2494 2495 2496 2497 2498 2499 2500 2501 2502 2503 2504 2505 2506 2507 2508 2509 2510 2511 2512 2513 2514 2515 2516 2517 2518 2519 2520 2521 2522 2523 2524 2525 2526 2527 2528 2529 2530 2531 2532 2533 2534 2535 2536 2537 2538 2539 2540 2541 2542 2543 2544 2545 2546 2547 2548 2549 2550 2551 2552 2553 2554 2555 2556 2557 2558 2559 2560 2561 2562 2563 2564 2565 2566 2567 2568 2569 2570 2571 2572 2573 2574 2575 2576 2577 2578 2579 2580 2581 2582 2583 2584 2585 2586 2587 2588 2589 2590 2591 2592 2593 2594 2595 2596 2597 2598 2599 2600 2601 2602 2603 2604 2605 2606 2607 2608 2609 2610 2611 2612 2613 2614 2615 2616 2617 2618 2619 2620 2621 2622 2623 2624 2625 2626 2627 2628 2629 2630 2631 2632 2633 2634 2635 2636 2637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 2645 2646 2647 2648 2649 2650 2651 2652 2653 2654 2655 2656 2657 2658 2659 2660 2661 2662 2663 2664 2665 2666 2667 2668 2669 2670 2671 2672 2673 2674 2675 2676 2677 2678 2679 2680 2681 2682 2683 2684 2685 2686 2687 2688 2689 2690 2691 2692 2693 2694 2695 2696 2697 2698 2699 2700 2701 2702 2703 2704 2705 2706 2707 2708 2709 2710 2711 2712 2713 2714 2715 2716 2717 2718 2719 2720 2721 2722 2723 2724 2725 2726 2727 2728 2729 2730 2731 2732 2733 2734 2735 2736 2737 2738 2739 2740 2741 2742 2743 2744 2745 2746 2747 2748 2749 2750 2751 2752 2753 2754 2755 2756 2757 2758 2759 2760 2761 2762 2763 2764 2765 2766 2767 2768 2769 2770 2771 2772 2773 2774 2775 2776 2777 2778 2779 2780 2781 2782 |
{
"paper_id": "2021",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T07:24:39.322551Z"
},
"title": "Automatic Assignment of Semantic Frames in Disaster Response Team Communication Dialogues",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Natalia",
"middle": [],
"last": "Skachkova",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "DFKI",
"location": {
"postCode": "66123",
"settlement": "Saarbr\u00fccken",
"country": "Germany"
}
},
"email": "natalia.skachkova@dfki.de"
},
{
"first": "Ivana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "DFKI",
"location": {
"postCode": "66123",
"settlement": "Saarbr\u00fccken",
"country": "Germany"
}
},
"email": ""
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "We investigate frame semantics as a meaning representation framework for team communication in a disaster response scenario. We focus on the automatic frame assignment and retrain PAFIBERT, which is one of the state-ofthe-art frame classifiers, on English and German disaster response team communication data, obtaining accuracy around 90%. We examine the performance of both models and discuss their adjustments, such as sampling of additional training instances from an unrelated domain and adding extra lexical and discourse features to input token representations. We show that sampling has some positive effect on the German frame classifier, discuss an unexpected impact of extra features on the models' behaviour and perform a careful error analysis.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "2021",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "We investigate frame semantics as a meaning representation framework for team communication in a disaster response scenario. We focus on the automatic frame assignment and retrain PAFIBERT, which is one of the state-ofthe-art frame classifiers, on English and German disaster response team communication data, obtaining accuracy around 90%. We examine the performance of both models and discuss their adjustments, such as sampling of additional training instances from an unrelated domain and adding extra lexical and discourse features to input token representations. We show that sampling has some positive effect on the German frame classifier, discuss an unexpected impact of extra features on the models' behaviour and perform a careful error analysis.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "In this paper we employ the theory of frame semantics as a meaning representation framework for dialogues from the domain of disaster response. Our work is part of a larger research project developing methods to capture and interpret verbal team communication in disaster response scenarios and use the extracted run-time mission knowledge for mission process assistance, as described in (Willms et al., 2019) . Team communication interpretation encompasses several aspects, some of which have been addressed in earlier publications of our team: (Anikina and Kruijff-Korbayova, 2019) present dialogue act classification results; (Skachkova and Kruijff-Korbayova, 2020) provide an analysis of contextual reference phenomena. The present paper complements this by results on semantic frame assignment. To our knowledge, our work is the first to use semantic frames in the domain of disaster response, and one of the few attempts implementing a frame classifier for dialogue.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 388,
"end": 409,
"text": "(Willms et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
},
{
"start": 546,
"end": 583,
"text": "(Anikina and Kruijff-Korbayova, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 629,
"end": 668,
"text": "(Skachkova and Kruijff-Korbayova, 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF29"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Frame semantics is a paradigm defining the meaning of words through the context they are used in (Fillmore, 1976) . This assumes that, depending on context, a word (or an expression) is able to evoke in our minds a certain event or situation together with a set of slots called frame elements associated with it, even if some of these slots were not explicitly filled in the sentence.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 97,
"end": 113,
"text": "(Fillmore, 1976)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF14"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Using frame semantics as a meaning representation requires frame semantic parsing, namely identifying frame-evoking elements (targets) and the corresponding frames, as well as recognizing certain spans as frame elements and classifying them. In this paper we address the task of automatic semantic frame assignment, given a target. The novelty is that we work on English and German dialogues in robot-assisted disaster response teams.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "We use the TRADR corpus (Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1 et al., 2015) , which contains transcribed communication in teams of firefighters using robots for incident site reconnaissance during a series of exercises that simulated situations after a disaster, such as a fire, explosion, etc. Towards the aim of creating structured representations of the events and activities during a first response mission by means of semantic frames, we experiment with some existing models. We start with a simple sequence classification approach that assumes finetuning of a pretrained BERT model (Devlin et al., 2019) on the TRADR corpus. Next, we use one of the existing state-of-the-art frame classifiers called PAFIBERT (Tan and Na, 2019) . We re-implement and train it on the English FrameNet (Baker et al., 1998) data, and evaluate the model on English TRADR dialogues. We also experiment with retraining PAFIBERT on the TRADR data, despite the small corpus size. In addition, we investigate a possibility of training a frame classifier on mixed data -FrameNet or SALSA (Burchardt et al., 2006) plus TRADR -and consider three sampling approaches. Finally, we examine whether enriching the input with lexical and discourse features has an effect on the classifier performance. In contrast to many papers that report standard accuracy or F-score to measure the performance of a frame classifier, we use the index of balanced accuracy metric (Garc\u00eda et al., 2009) designed specifically for imbalanced data.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 24,
"end": 56,
"text": "(Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1 et al., 2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF23"
},
{
"start": 569,
"end": 590,
"text": "(Devlin et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
},
{
"start": 696,
"end": 714,
"text": "(Tan and Na, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
},
{
"start": 770,
"end": 790,
"text": "(Baker et al., 1998)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
},
{
"start": 1048,
"end": 1072,
"text": "(Burchardt et al., 2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
},
{
"start": 1417,
"end": 1438,
"text": "(Garc\u00eda et al., 2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "In Section 2 we give a brief overview of the theory of frame semantics. In Section 3 we introduce the most notable frameworks designed to perform automatic frame assignment or frame-semantic parsing. In Section 4 we examine the distribution of semantic frames and the role of ambiguous targets in the TRADR corpus, compare our data with FrameNet and SALSA, and explain how we prepared and split all the data into training, validation and test sets. Section 5 describes the experiments and their results. In Section 6 we make a conclusion and indicate possible further steps.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "According to Petruck (2019), frame semantics is a research program in empirical semantics which emphasizes the continuities between language and experience, and provides a framework for presenting the results of that research.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Frame Semantics",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "The theory of frame semantics goes back to the 1970s. One of the pioneers in this area was Charles J. Fillmore. He suggested that a language description should include not only lexicon and grammar, but also a set of 'frames' that incorporate the semantics of the language elements (Fillmore, 1976) . Fillmore (1982) uses the word 'frame' as a general cover term for such concepts as 'schema', 'script', 'scenario', or 'cognitive model'. He defines a frame as a system of concepts which are related to each other, and states that one cannot understand a concept without understanding the whole structure it is a part of. Frame semantics tries to describe and formalize such structures.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 281,
"end": 297,
"text": "(Fillmore, 1976)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF14"
},
{
"start": 300,
"end": 315,
"text": "Fillmore (1982)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Frame Semantics",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "The FrameNet project (Baker et al., 1998) is considered one of the first practical realizations of the theory of frame semantics for English. One of its achievements was the creation of a lexical database that covers more than 13,000 word senses, is both human-and machine-readable and available online. Besides, more than 200,000 sentences were annotated with about 1,200 semantic frames, and are now known as the FrameNet corpus.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 21,
"end": 41,
"text": "(Baker et al., 1998)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Frame Semantics",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Examples 2.1 and 2.2 present a definition of the Inspecting frame and its frame elements (FEs), an-notated with respect to the target inspected. Note that FEs can be 'core' (i.e. essential to the meaning of a frame) and 'non-core' (i.e. not uniquely characterizing). Usually, core FEs are part of the frame definition, like INSPECTOR and GROUND in Example 2.2.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Frame Semantics",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Example 2.1 'Inspecting' Frame Definition An INSPECTOR directs his/her perceptual attention to a GROUND to ascertain whether the GROUND is intact or whether an UNWANTED ENTITY is present. Alternatively, the desired outcome of the inspection may be presented as a PURPOSE. Databases similar to FrameNet were also created for other languages. In Section 4 we compare the FrameNet corpus and its German counterpart SALSA with the TRADR data.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Frame Semantics",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Frame semantics is not one of the most common meaning representation frameworks. However, research in the area of frame-semantic parsing has increased since frame-semantic structure extraction was included as a task in SemEval'07 (Baker et al., 2007) . Most of the existing works present models trained on text data. Some of the projects deal only with automatic frame assignment, others have a bigger goal, namely, recognizing targets, frames and frame elements. In what follows we will focus on automatic frame assignment.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 230,
"end": 250,
"text": "(Baker et al., 2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "Most of the early frameworks are based on the idea of learning the frame labels from frameevoking targets represented as rather elaborated sets of features, which include the target's lemma, its part of speech, etc. Many features rely on dependency syntax. For non-ambiguous targets a frame can be retrieved using a simple mapping. If the target is ambiguous, the correct label is learned using a Naive Bayes classifier, e.g., as shown by Erk (2005) , or an SVM classifier like in the framework called LTH (Johansson and Nugues, 2007) , or a discriminative probabilistic (log-linear) model like in SEMAFOR by Das et al. (2010) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 439,
"end": 449,
"text": "Erk (2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF13"
},
{
"start": 506,
"end": 534,
"text": "(Johansson and Nugues, 2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
},
{
"start": 609,
"end": 626,
"text": "Das et al. (2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "The success of neural networks for many NLP tasks resulted in a gradual switch from the featurebased approaches to embeddings and a broader usage of neural networks for the task of automatic frame assignment. One of the first semantic parsers to use embeddings was developed by Hermann et al. (2014) . They represent targets as vectors, certain parts of which are reserved for certain argument representations. All frame labels are also vectors, and the classifier learns to minimize the distance between the targets and the correct labels. Other frameworks based on embeddings and various types of neural networks include Simple-FrameId (Hartmann et al., 2017 ) -a two-layer network which also allows to perform frame filtering using mappings of certain lexical units to certain frames from the FrameNet database; a framework by Yang and Mitchell (2017) that performs frame identification using a simple multi-layer network; TSABCNN (Zhao et al., 2018) , which uses word2vec embeddings and convolutional neural networks.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 278,
"end": 299,
"text": "Hermann et al. (2014)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF19"
},
{
"start": 638,
"end": 660,
"text": "(Hartmann et al., 2017",
"ref_id": "BIBREF18"
},
{
"start": 830,
"end": 854,
"text": "Yang and Mitchell (2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF35"
},
{
"start": 934,
"end": 953,
"text": "(Zhao et al., 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF36"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "Recently, there appeared frameworks that rely on BERT embeddings and pretrained models. E.g., PAFIBERT (Tan and Na, 2019) fine-tunes the pretrained BERT model using an attention mechanism to give weights to words that make up the context of the target. An interesting alternative approach was presented by Kalyanpur et al. (2020) . They interpret frame-semantic parsing as a sequence-tosequence generation problem. Their approach is based on the encoder-decoder architecture, namely on the T5 model, which is available via the Hug-gingFace library (Wolf et al., 2020) . Ribeiro et al. (2020) treat automatic frame assignment as a clustering problem. They focus on verbal frame-evoking targets and represent them using contextualized ELMo embeddings. The targets are treated as nodes in a graph, and clustered using the Chinese Whispers algorithm (Biemann, 2006) . A new instance is classified by determining the closest cluster.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 103,
"end": 121,
"text": "(Tan and Na, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
},
{
"start": 306,
"end": 329,
"text": "Kalyanpur et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF22"
},
{
"start": 548,
"end": 567,
"text": "(Wolf et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF34"
},
{
"start": 570,
"end": 591,
"text": "Ribeiro et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF27"
},
{
"start": 846,
"end": 861,
"text": "(Biemann, 2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "All the above frameworks were trained on text data. We found only two frame-semantic parsers designed specifically for dialogue. One of them was created in the course of the LUNA project (Raymond et al., 2008) and focuses mostly on frame element classification (Coppola et al., 2008) . The other was presented by Trione et al. (2015) . Its main goal is actually to speed up the manual annotation process, not pure frame-semantic parsing. Frames are detected with the help of a hand-crafted set of lexical triggers, which includes 200 most frequent words from 7 domains.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 187,
"end": 209,
"text": "(Raymond et al., 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
},
{
"start": 261,
"end": 283,
"text": "(Coppola et al., 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 313,
"end": 333,
"text": "Trione et al. (2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF32"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "A comparison of the frameworks mentioned above, as well as the results of their evaluation on the test data can be found in Appendix D. We do not place them here for space reasons.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "For the experiments on the TRADR data presented in this paper we have chosen the PAFI-BERT approach (Tan and Na, 2019) . PAFIBERT is one of the state-of-the-art frame classifiers, it showed about 89% accuracy when evaluated on the FrameNet test set, and it is easy to re-implement.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 100,
"end": 118,
"text": "(Tan and Na, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "The TRADR corpus consists of 15 files with dialogues, six files contain dialogues in English, and nine -in German. Six German dialogues were translated into English in order to get more English training data. TRADR dialogues comprise the communication in first responder teams using robots for disaster site reconnaissance. Each team consists of several operators (OP) who control ground and airborne robots, a team leader (TL) and sometimes also a mission commander (MC). Table 1 shows the distribution of dialogue turns, utterances and tokens between the mission participants in both English and German TRADR dialogues. Also, average numbers of utterances per turn and tokens per utterance are given. We see that both English and German parts of the data contain approximately the same number of dialogue turns, however the turns in the English dialogues are slightly longer, and as a result the English part of the corpus is 1.5 times larger. The utterances are usually rather short -7-9 tokens on average, as the team participants try to be brief and precise. We annotated the utterances in the English TRADR dialogues with frame-evoking targets, corresponding lexical units (LUs), frames and parent frames. Frame elements were not annotated. The German TRADR data was annotated similarly, except that we replaced targets and LUs with 'tar-get related elements', which represent the whole phrase that the target is a part of. We assumed that each utterance can potentially have several targets or groups of frame related elements. As a result, the number of frame instances in the TRADR corpus is larger than the number of utterances given in Table 1 . While annotating our data with semantic frames we tried to follow the FrameNet annotation guidelines (Ruppenhofer et al., 2006) . Due to the specifics of our domain, many FrameNet frame definitions had to be adapted. Also, ten new frames were introduced. The English and German parts of the corpus were annotated by two different annotators. To check the reliability of the annotation, one dialogue in German (534 frame instances) was also annotated by the person responsible for the annotation of the English dialogues. Inter-annotator agreement measured using Cohen's Kappa (Carletta, 1996) reached 0.73, which is considered reliable. A team communication example annotated with semantic frames, as well as the definitions of the new frames are available in Appendix C. We are making the annotated data available online. 1 In total, the English and German parts of the TRADR corpus contain 4,191 and 3,519 frame instances, respectively. These instances are distributed between 190 (English) and 152 (German) different frame labels. The distribution of the frame labels is not uniform.Thus, in English TRADR almost 60% of all the instances belong to the top ten most frequent frames, and 137 out of 190 frames have only ten or less samples, which all together make up about 10% of the data. In German TRADR the instances of the top ten most frequent frames make up approximately 58%, and instances of 105 infrequent frames -almost 11% of the data. The fact that the TRADR data is highly imbalanced motivates the choice of performance metrics for the evaluation of the frame classifiers that will be discussed in the next section.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 1758,
"end": 1784,
"text": "(Ruppenhofer et al., 2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF28"
},
{
"start": 2233,
"end": 2249,
"text": "(Carletta, 1996)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF8"
},
{
"start": 2480,
"end": 2481,
"text": "1",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 473,
"end": 480,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
},
{
"start": 1647,
"end": 1654,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Data for experiments",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "The English TRADR data counts 434 different LUs. Their distribution is also not uniform: the top ten most common LUs occur in about 40% of all the utterances and at the same time make only slightly more than 2% of the total of different LUs. All LUs are distributed between seven different POS tags. 75% of the utterances contain verbal targets. The second frequent POS tag is an interjection -almost 8% of all the targets.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Data for experiments",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "Only about 15% of all LUs in English TRADR are ambiguous. However, they are realized in nearly 53% of utterances containing targets. Simple calculations show that on average a single LU evokes 1.24 frames. So, while the ambiguous LUs are not very frequent in comparison to non-ambiguous ones, the frames that they evoke are frequent, and this may become a problem for the frame classifier, as it is not always possible to perform frame disambiguation using the utterance context.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Data for experiments",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "Besides TRADR we also use the FrameNet and SALSA datasets for our experiments, so it is necessary to compare them with our data. The differences between the corpora are summarized in Table 14 , presented in Appendix. Note that for the experiments all duplicate sentences/utterances (i.e. equal strings with equal labels), as well as elliptical utterances and communication fragments (in TRADR) were removed. The numbers in Table 14 are based on the cleaned versions of the corpora. The only exception is the average utterance length in the TRADR corpus, that was calculated based on the original data in Table 1 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 183,
"end": 191,
"text": "Table 14",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
},
{
"start": 423,
"end": 431,
"text": "Table 14",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
},
{
"start": 604,
"end": 611,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Data for experiments",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "The FrameNet and SALSA data are very different from TRADR, cf. Table 14 . First, they are much larger and come from other domains (note that the domains of FrameNet and SALSA are quite close to each other). Both FrameNet and SALSA include many more frames than TRADR, and despite the fact that many frames are common for all the corpora (e.g., about 93% of frame labels in English TRADR also occur in FrameNet), the frame distributions are very different. The fact that less than 65% of TRADR LUs are common with FrameNet LUs, which are much more numerous, supports this. Both FrameNet and SALSA are also imbalanced and FrameNet contains ambiguous targets. All the datasets were shuffled and randomly split into training, validation and test data as shown in Table 2 . Note that the number of classes (frame labels) is smaller than given in Table 14 , as all the frames that have less than five instances were removed. This was necessary to perform 5-fold cross-validation. Note that we have two English TRADR test sets. The second one is a subset of the first one, and contains the instances of 50 frames common to both FrameNet and TRADR. It is needed to test the PAFIBERT model trained on FrameNet.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 63,
"end": 71,
"text": "Table 14",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
},
{
"start": 759,
"end": 766,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": "TABREF4"
},
{
"start": 841,
"end": 849,
"text": "Table 14",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Data for experiments",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "In this section we will present semantic frame classifiers for both English and German TRADR dialogues. Our main focus is on the English data. We introduce several models, split into basic and adjusted, and discuss their performance.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiments and Discussion",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "As all our datasets have hundreds of classes and are highly imbalanced, many typical performance metrics, e.g., accuracy, precision, F-score, are not reliable (Tharwat, 2020) . Instead, we use the index of balanced accuracy (IBA) metric as our main performance measure, calculated using the Python imbalanced-learn package (Lema\u00eetre et al., 2017) . The package also outputs the scores of the common metrics, such as recall, precision and F-score, and we show them for the sake of comparison, as most papers on automatic frame assignment report either accuracy, or these metrics. All the metrics are calculated using macro-averaging.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 159,
"end": 174,
"text": "(Tharwat, 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF31"
},
{
"start": 323,
"end": 346,
"text": "(Lema\u00eetre et al., 2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF24"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiments and Discussion",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "The first group includes four models. The first one is a naive baseline, represented by the BertForSe-quenceClassification model from the Transformers library (Wolf et al., 2020) fine-tuned on English TRADR. BertForSequenceClassification was chosen as the most straightforward way to perform sequence classification. It is a pretrained BERT model with an additional linear layer on top of the pooled output. The other three models reproduce the architecture of PAFIBERT. The implementation details can be found in the original paper by Tan and Na (2019) . One of the models was trained on the FrameNet data, another -purely on English TRADR data, the last one -on German TRADR data.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 159,
"end": 178,
"text": "(Wolf et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF34"
},
{
"start": 536,
"end": 553,
"text": "Tan and Na (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Basic models",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "All four models were trained with 5-fold crossvalidation. As both English and German TRADR datasets are small, different splits into training and test parts may result in noticeable performance variance. We used cross-validation to get a more reliable estimation of the performance of the models, not for hyper-parameter search. All hyperparameters were taken from the original paper. Following Tan and Na (2019) , training was performed for 8 epochs per fold using an adaptive learning rate that starts with 3e-5 and an AdamW optimizer. In the course of cross-validation we always saved the model with the best IBA validation score. Next, the model was evaluated on the test data.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 395,
"end": 412,
"text": "Tan and Na (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Basic models",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "The performance of the basic models is summarized in Table 3 . We see that BertForSequence-Classification demonstrates rather unsatisfactory performance -IBA only 32% -37%. The reason for this is the fact that simple fine-tuning does not integrate information about the frame-evoking targets and their contexts, so that it is impossible for the model to guess what tokens in the sequence it has to focus on. It is obvious that in order to improve the performance, we need to tell the model which tokens in each utterance it should pay attention to, and PAFIBERT provides a convenient way to do so. As Table 3 shows, PAFIBERT trained on the FrameNet data has IBA of 91% when evaluated on the test set coming from the same distribution. This score is actually even slightly better than the standard accuracy of 89% reported by Tan and Na (2019) . However, when tested on TRADR data, the model shows much worse results, namely, only 51% IBA, despite the fact that the majority of the 50 frames from the given test set have enough instances in the training set.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 825,
"end": 842,
"text": "Tan and Na (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 53,
"end": 60,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": "TABREF6"
},
{
"start": 601,
"end": 608,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": "TABREF6"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Basic models",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "The main reasons why this classifier fails on the TRADR data are as follows. First of all, due to the fact that FrameNet is very fine-grained, many TRADR instances got classified as belonging to very specific frames which we did not use when annotating the TRADR data, like 'Interior profile relation' and 'Non gradable proximity' (we used their parent frame 'Locative relation' instead). Another reason is that TRADR instances of certain frames have targets that, due to domain differences, are not typical for these frames in FrameNet. For instance, all TRADR samples of 'Create representation' frame were misclassified, because the model expected 'draw', 'carve' or 'sketch' as targets, but got 'take/make a picture' and labeled the input utterances as 'Physical artwork' instead. Finally, there is also a problem of ambiguity. For example, the target 'change' can evoke both 'Replacing' and 'Cause change' frames, and the target 'lie' -'Posture' and 'Being located'.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Basic models",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "So, the error analysis shows that the PAFIBERT model trained on FrameNet is domain-specific, it does not generalize well, and we cannot simply reuse it for TRADR data without special modifications or further fine-tuning.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Basic models",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "Now let us have a look at the performance of the PAFIBERT models trained on English and German TRADR. Despite the relatively small size of the training data, the models manage to achieve IBA scores of about 88% (English) and 83% (German). The English model also demonstrates quite good performance (86% IBA) on the subset of the main English TRADR test set, used to evaluate PAFIB-ERT trained on the FrameNet data. Notice that the IBA metric is fairer than standard accuracy: despite the fact that the subset of the TRADR test set does not contain the instances of the most frequent domain-specific 'Communication by protocol' and 'Communication response message' frames, which are easier to recognize due to their shortness and typical structure, the IBA score for this test set is only 2% lower. In order to understand why we have 5% difference in performance between the English and German frame classifiers trained on TRADR, we performed error analysis. The results are summarized in Table 4 . We see that the majority of errors happens because of ambiguous targets, and the proportion of such errors is about 10% higher among the errors made by the English frame classifier. At the same time the German frame classifier makes much more the so-called silly mistakes, which encompass the cases when the assigned frame has nothing to do with the given target. We attribute the worse performance of the German classifier mostly to the fact that instead of targets we used 'frame related elements', which sometimes contain several tokens and can be confusing for the classifier. Differences between the languages (i.e. in morphology, syntax, semantics) may also be important. E.g., verbs with separable prefixes, like 'zur\u00fcckkehren' or 'vorbeikommen', as targets may lead to errors, as the prefixes often get disregarded. Finally, because of small test sizes, the role of chance (in)correct assignments may get exaggerated.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 988,
"end": 995,
"text": "Table 4",
"ref_id": "TABREF8"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Basic models",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "Aiming at performance improvement, we experimented with several adjustments of the PAFIBERT model trained on TRADR. Below we discuss the results and analyse the errors.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "Sampling We performed a series of experiments with sampling additional training examples from the subsets of the FrameNet and SALSA corpora, which contain only instances of those frames that occur in TRADR. The FrameNet subset for sampling has 21,492 instances (about 12% of the whole FrameNet corpus), the SALSA subset -2,486 (about 7% of the corpus). The experiments can be split into two groups. The first group includes training models with different portions of blindly sampled data. The second part involves experiments with informed sampling. Each model is trained on a mixture of TRADR and sampled data, and validated solely on TRADR data.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "In the blind sampling scenario we train ten models gradually increasing the amount of additional training examples randomly chosen from the FrameNet or SALSA subsets. The results for the English frame classifier are in Table 5 . We see that there is no clear correlation between the sampled data size and performance. Three models demonstrate an improvement by 1% in comparison with the basic model, however, this difference is insignificant according to the McNe-mar's test. A lack of positive influence of the blind sampling can be caused by the fact that the subset of the FrameNet data used for sampling only contains a small amount of really useful instances. If only a part of the subset is sampled, these instances have high chances to be left out due the randomization of the sampling procedure. In case the whole subset is sampled, the additional instances may dominate the original ones, as the FrameNet subset for sampling is much larger than TRADR.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 219,
"end": 226,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": "TABREF10"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "In contrast to this, the effect of the blind random sampling on the German frame classifier is clearly positive. As Table 6 shows, having more training data leads to the IBA score increase by 4%. To get an explanation why blind sampling has a different impact on the two classifiers, we plot the learning curves that show how training and validation losses depend on the proportion of sampled data. As Figure 1 shows, adding training instances from FrameNet and SALSA does not lead to validation loss decrease and better generalization ability of the models. Notice that even without sampling the gap between the two curves in each plot is large, with training losses being close to zero, which is usually interpreted as overfitting. This finding lead us to check the learning curves of PAFIBERT trained on the much larger FrameNet data. The overfitting problem occurs in that case, too (see Appendix A). To tackle the overfitting issue, we tried out several experiments with increased dropout rate and fewer training epochs, but they only led to the IBA score decrease. We conclude that some fundamental changes in PAFIBERT's architecture would be needed to avoid overfitting.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 116,
"end": 123,
"text": "Table 6",
"ref_id": "TABREF12"
},
{
"start": 402,
"end": 410,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "In both plots in Figure 1 the validation loss grows together with the number of sampled examples. This means that even if the models continue making correct predictions, their confidence sinks. In case of the German frame classifier this growth is not so rapid, which can probably be explained by the fact that the SALSA subset for sampling is much smaller than the corresponding FrameNet subset. Knowing that IBA is actually improving, we hypothesize that sampled data from an unrelated domain can be helpful, but the right amount of these instances and their quality criteria are rather difficult to determine. The main disadvantage of blind sampling is that the instances are picked out regardless of their distribution in both original training data and data held out for sampling, which may aggravate the imbalance problem.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 17,
"end": 25,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "To overcome this, we tried two approaches using informed sampling. One is balancing sampling. It assumes sampling for each class no more than the maximum number of instances of the most common frame in the TRADR training data. The approach is supposed to deal with the class imbalance problem. However, this method also has a potential disadvantage. In case the number of original TRADR utterances is small, and the number of sampled instances is much larger, with their targets being different from those in the original utterances, the model will be biased towards the dominating training samples and thus prone to misclassification of the TRADR test examples. To avoid this we introduce equal sampling, which has an additional constraint that the number of sampled examples cannot exceed the number of the original ones.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "The scores in Table 7 show that the informed sampling does not produce the expected positive effect on the English frame classifier. So, we see that sampling failed to produce any positive effect on the English frame classifier, but worked for the German one. We hypothesize that this happens to a large extent because sampling mostly helps to resolve simple mistakes, but is less effective in cases where disambiguation is necessary. More complex morphology of German may also be a reason why additional training examples proved to be more useful.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 14,
"end": 21,
"text": "Table 7",
"ref_id": "TABREF14"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "Extra features Our next goal is to check if extending BERT embeddings with extra features has any positive impact on the performance of PAFIB-ERT. We divide the features into two groups: lexical features that include POS tags and subword masks, and discourse features represented by speaker tags and dialogue acts. Our modifications of the original architecture by Tan and Na (2019) are given in Appendix, Figures 3 and 4 .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 365,
"end": 382,
"text": "Tan and Na (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 406,
"end": 421,
"text": "Figures 3 and 4",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "The introduction of lexical features is motivated by the following reasons. First, we have cases, when the POS tag of a target may be important to differentiate one frame from another. E.g., in the utterance \"Can you position yourself onto the track?\" the target 'position' is a verb and evokes the 'Placing' frame, while in the utterance \"What's your current position?\" 'position' is a noun that induces the frame 'Locale by collocation'. Second, BERT tokenization splits the tokens that are not included in the tokenizer vocabulary, and sometimes it happens that some parts of a token lie outside of the target's context window.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "POS tagging was done with a tagger from the Python SpaCy library (Honnibal and Montani, 2017) . There are 19 coarse-grained tags that follow the Universal Dependencies scheme. We add two more tags to this set: SPECIAL to mark special tokens used by BERT and separate them from 'normal' ones, and PAD for padded tokens. If a token gets split by the tokenizer, each sub-token is assigned the POS tag of the original word. Our subword masks are bit vectors where all sub-tokens are marked with ones, and intact tokens -with zeros.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 65,
"end": 93,
"text": "(Honnibal and Montani, 2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF20"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "Embeddings for lexical features are trained together with the model. They are concatenated with the BERT model output, namely with (sub)token vectors, and used as input for the position-based attention layer of PAFIBERT. As (sub)token representations get longer, we have to increase the size of the first linear layer of PAFIBERT accordingly.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "The second group of additional features includes discourse features, namely the speaker tag and dialogue act type, which also can be useful for frame disambiguation. E.g., given a short utterance \"Try it\" with the target 'try', the classifier may have difficulties labeling it, because to assign the correct frame it needs to know the perspective, i.e. the speaker. If the speaker is the team leader, then the correct frame is 'Attempt suasion', if it is an operator, then it should be the 'Attempt' frame. The information about the dialogue act type can be used to strengthen the impact of the speaker tag, because there exist a strong correlation between the speaker and the dialogue act in the tradr dialogues (Anikina and Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1, 2019) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 713,
"end": 750,
"text": "(Anikina and Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "Following Anikina and Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1 (2019), we use three labels to encode the speakers: MC for the mission commander, TL for the team leader and OPERATOR for the rest of the team.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "As for dialogue acts, we use 12 labels based on the ISO-24617-2 guidelines Bunt (2019) , with a few modifications. Eight tags correspond to those used in Anikina and Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1 (2019) : 'Affirmative ', 'Confirm', 'Contact', 'Disconfirm', 'Inform', 'Negative', 'Question' and 'Request' . The other four labels are 'Communication Management', 'Time Management', 'Discourse Structuring' and 'Social Obligations'.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 75,
"end": 86,
"text": "Bunt (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
},
{
"start": 154,
"end": 190,
"text": "Anikina and Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1 (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
},
{
"start": 206,
"end": 291,
"text": "', 'Confirm', 'Contact', 'Disconfirm', 'Inform', 'Negative', 'Question' and 'Request'",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "Embeddings for discourse features are trained jointly with the model. Since they characterize the whole utterance and not separate (sub)tokens, we concatenate them with the output of the PAFIBERT position-based attention layer. We increase the size of the first linear layer in the model accordingly.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "The performance of the English frame classifier trained on the data enriched with lexical and dialogue features is given in Table 9 . We test the features separately and in combinations. We see that taken separately, the features do not bring any improvement, and sometimes the scores are actually slightly worse than the score achieved by the basic classifier. The combination of POS tags and subword masks seems to increase the performance by 1%, but the difference is insignificant according to the McNemar's test. As for the German frame classifier, we tested only the impact of extra lexical features. Dialogue features were not used, as the current data does not include speaker and dialogue act annotations. The results were similar to those demonstrated by the English frame classifier with extra lexical features. We do not include them here due to space constraints. They are available in Appendix B.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 124,
"end": 131,
"text": "Table 9",
"ref_id": "TABREF17"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "It is difficult to say why neither lexical nor discourse features lead to performance improvement. One of possible reason is that our learned feature embeddings are rather short (2-4 neurons) in comparison with input embeddings (768 neurons) or context-target embeddings (1536 neurons), so their impact on the whole (sub)token/utterance representations is actually negligible or even confusing. We think that in order to get a better estimation of the role of additional features, some further experiments with more data are necessary.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adjustments of PAFIBERT",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "We investigated the potential of frame semantics as a meaning representation framework for English and German dialogues in the domain of robotassisted disaster response team communication. We found semantic frames convenient for capturing the meaning of an utterance depending on the target -the approach is span-based and does not require complex data annotation or pre-processing.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "We reused the PAFIBERT model on the TRADR data and achieved an IBA score of 88%-90% on the test sets. Our results are comparable with those reported by Tan and Na (2019) , who trained their models on the much larger FrameNet corpus. However, being a powerful model, PAFIBERT memorized the small TRADR training data, leading to overfitting and thus lack of generalization.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 152,
"end": 169,
"text": "Tan and Na (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "We also studied the impact of sampling additional training instances from an unrelated domain on the classifier's performance, and found that it was useful only for the German frame classifier. Error analysis indicates that sampling is beneficial for handling silly errors, but rather ineffective for cases that require disambiguation. We did not perform any experiments with over-and/or undersampling which imply sampling from the original dataset and are often used with imbalanced data. This can be a subject for further research. Especially interesting is an approach that assumes generating synthetic training instances, e.g., embeddings incorporating the targets with their contexts.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "In contrast to our expectations, both lexical and discourse features failed to demonstrate a positive influence on the models' performance.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "Error analysis showed that the largest group of errors is due to ambiguous targets, many of which evoke semantically close frames. The problem of disambiguation requires more research in order to improve the performance of the models.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "(BMBF), grant No. I3N14856. 2 We would like to thank our A-DRZ colleagues for discussions, Daria Fedorova for data annotation and the IWCS 2021 reviewers for valuable comments which we hope helped us to improve the paper.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 28,
"end": 29,
"text": "2",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "A PAFIBERT: training and validation losses Figure 2 shows the changes of training and validation losses with each training epoch of our reimplementation of the original PAFIBERT according to Tan and Na (2019) . One can see that the model is powerful enough to memorize the training data by the end of the training, but, judging by the gap between the two curves, it has difficulties in generalizing and making confident predictions. Starting from the second epoch, the validation loss almost does not change, and it is also larger than the validation loss of the frame classifiers trained on TRADR, which can probably be attributed to the fact that FrameNet has many more classes than TRADR. Table 10 shows the performance of the German frame classifier with extra lexical features. Extending token embeddings with the corresponding POS tag embeddings seems to have a small positive effect on the IBA score, however, it is not significant according to the McNemar's test. Adding subword mask embeddings as well as using the combination of two extra features also does not seem to influence the performance of the classifier. Finally, we try extending token embeddings with POS tag embeddings together with the equal sampling from SALSA. However, the equal sampling, which earlier helped us achieve the IBA score of 90%, fails to provide the anticipated positive effect -the current score is only 84%, and the McNemar's test interprets the improvement as insignificant. We conclude that adding lexical features confuses the frame classifier, so that sampling looses its positive effect on the accuracy. Table 11 shows one of the TRADR dialogues. The first column presents the speakers, the secondthe utterances that sometimes also contain output from the Transcriber tool (Barras et al., 1998) (e.g., [ent=unk.skippable] ), the third -the assigned frames depending on the targets (given in bold). According to our annotation approach, each utterance may contain several targets and thus evoke several frames. To make the dependencies between the targets and the corresponding frames clear, we annotated only one target-frame pair per row. This resulted in creating copies of the utterances containing several targets. They are given in italics.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 191,
"end": 208,
"text": "Tan and Na (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
},
{
"start": 1771,
"end": 1819,
"text": "(Barras et al., 1998) (e.g., [ent=unk.skippable]",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 43,
"end": 51,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": "FIGREF1"
},
{
"start": 692,
"end": 700,
"text": "Table 10",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
},
{
"start": 1602,
"end": 1610,
"text": "Table 11",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "Most of the targets in the example dialogue are verbs which reflects our focus on various activities performed as part of the rescue mission. The team communication example also illustrates two out of ten frames that we had to introduce during the annotation, as the FrameNet database (FrameNet, 2021) is not exhaustive, and it was not always possible to adapt the available frames to new phenomena. These two frames are 'Communication by protocol' and 'Communication response message'. They are domainspecific and are actually the most frequent in the whole TRADR corpus. Other eight frames that were introduced are rare. Table 12 contains the definitions and examples of all the new frames that we introduced. Frame elements are given in CAPITAL letters. We have not worked out their definitions yet. This is planned for future work.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 623,
"end": 631,
"text": "Table 12",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "The presented dialogue also has instances of the FrameNet frames that we adapted. Assigning the frame labels, sometimes it was impossible to follow the frame definitions given in the FrameNet database strictly. Considering that FrameNet is not exhaustive and that we were cautious to introduce too many new frames, we had to interpret certain frame definitions in a more relaxed way. E.g., FrameNet defines the frame 'Existence' as \"An Entity is declared to exist, generally irrespective of its position or even the possibility of its position being specified. ... This frame is to be contrasted with Presence, which describes the existence of an Entity in a particular (and salient) spacio-temporal context, and which also entails the presence of an observer who can detect the existence of the Entity in that context.\" We used Existence in a more straightforward way, namely with a reference to some news, findings, updates, etc. are present/available at a certain moment. Other adapted frames present in the dialogue are Presence and Identity. We do not present a full list of the adapted frames here, as there are quite many of them.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "Notice that some utterances in the dialogue do not contain targets, as they are elliptical. In such cases we usually try to infer the missing elements, and assign the frame label that corresponds to the 'restored' utterance.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "D Approaches to automatic frame assignment: a summary Table 13 summarizes the characteristics of most of the frameworks mentioned in Section 3. The frameworks are given in chronological order, which helps illustrate the shift from the rule-and/or featurebased approaches to the embeddings-based ones, as well as the replacement of more 'traditional' classifiers with neural networks. The introduction of embeddings allowed to avoid manual feature engineering, and helped achieve better or comparable results with much less effort. However, the embeddings (even contextual ones, like ELMo or BERT) are still not able to deal with sense ambiguity effectively, which is one of the main problems in automatic frame assignment task. The last row shows the performance of the frameworks. Those that have scores given were trained on the FrameNet corpus (versions may differ) and evaluated on one of the most commonly used Das test set (Das and Smith, 2011) , which represents a part of FrameNet 1.5 data. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to compare the frameworks directly, as some researchers report F-score as a performance measure, others -accuracy. Five frameworks were evaluated on different test data, and we therefore omit their scores. Activity ongoing Andreas from Markus, priority on continuing person search.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 929,
"end": 950,
"text": "(Das and Smith, 2011)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 54,
"end": 62,
"text": "Table 13",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "Activity ongoing Frame assignment accuracy n/a n/a n/a 82.97 * 88.41 87.63 70.9 * \u2020 88.2 89.72 89.57 n/a n/a Table 13 : Comparison of various frame-semantic parsing frameworks; scores marked with '*' stand for F-score (the authors do not report accuracy); 'n/a' means that the authors used a test set different from Das and Smith (2011) ; \u2020 stands for joint evaluation of frame assignment and argument identification ",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 316,
"end": 336,
"text": "Das and Smith (2011)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 109,
"end": 117,
"text": "Table 13",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "The TRADR data and the semantic frame annotations can be obtained at http://talkingrobots.dfki.de/.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [
{
"text": "This work is part of the project \"A-DRZ: Setting up the German Rescue Robotics Center\", funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Acknowledgments",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Be piece of Inherits from:Being included Definition: A PART is considered to be a constituent of some entity described by the WHOLE. The relation is seen from the point of view of the PART.Examples: I can also see [PART fragments] ",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 214,
"end": 230,
"text": "[PART fragments]",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "annex",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Dialogue act classification in team communication for robot assisted disaster response",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Tatiana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Anikina",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ivana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kruijff-Korbayova",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "399--410",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/W19-5946"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Tatiana Anikina and Ivana Kruijff-Korbayova. 2019. Dialogue act classification in team communication for robot assisted disaster response. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 399-410, Stockholm, Sweden. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "Dialogue act classification in team communication for robot assisted disaster response",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Tatiana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Anikina",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ivana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of SIGDIAL",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Tatiana Anikina and Ivana Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1. 2019. Dialogue act classification in team communication for robot assisted disaster response. In Proceedings of SIGDIAL 2019.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "SemEval-2007 Task 19: Frame semantic structure extraction",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Collin",
"middle": [
"F"
],
"last": "Baker",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michael",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ellsworth",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Katrin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Erk",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "99--104",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Collin F. Baker, Michael Ellsworth, and Katrin Erk. 2007. SemEval-2007 Task 19: Frame semantic structure extraction. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007), pages 99-104.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "The Berkeley FrameNet project",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Collin",
"middle": [
"F"
],
"last": "Baker",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Charles",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Fillmore",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "John",
"middle": [
"B"
],
"last": "Lowe",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1998,
"venue": "COLING-ACL '98: Proceedings of the Conference",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "86--90",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Collin F. Baker, Charles J. Fillmore, and John B. Lowe. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet project. In COLING- ACL '98: Proceedings of the Conference, pages 86- 90, Montreal, Canada.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Transcriber: a free tool for segmenting, labeling and transcribing speech",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Claude",
"middle": [],
"last": "Barras",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Edouard",
"middle": [],
"last": "Geoffrois",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Zhibiao",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mark",
"middle": [],
"last": "Liberman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1998,
"venue": "First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1373--1376",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Claude Barras, Edouard Geoffrois, Zhibiao Wu, and Mark Liberman. 1998. Transcriber: a free tool for segmenting, labeling and transcribing speech. In First International Conference on Language Re- sources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 1373-1376.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "Chinese whispers -an efficient graph clustering algorithm and its application to natural language processing problems",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Chris",
"middle": [],
"last": "Biemann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "Proceedings of TextGraphs: the First Workshop on Graph Based Methods for Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "73--80",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Chris Biemann. 2006. Chinese whispers -an efficient graph clustering algorithm and its application to nat- ural language processing problems. In Proceedings of TextGraphs: the First Workshop on Graph Based Methods for Natural Language Processing, pages 73-80, New York City. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Guidelines for using ISO standard 24617-2",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Harry",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bunt",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Harry Bunt. 2019. Guidelines for using ISO standard 24617-2. [s.n.].",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "The SALSA corpus: a German corpus resource for lexical semantics",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Aljoscha",
"middle": [],
"last": "Burchardt",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Katrin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Erk",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Anette",
"middle": [],
"last": "Frank",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andrea",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kowalski",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sebastian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pad\u00f3",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Manfred",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pinkal",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "LREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "969--974",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Aljoscha Burchardt, Katrin Erk, Anette Frank, An- drea Kowalski, Sebastian Pad\u00f3, and Manfred Pinkal. 2006. The SALSA corpus: a German corpus re- source for lexical semantics. In LREC, pages 969- 974.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jean",
"middle": [],
"last": "Carletta",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1996,
"venue": "Comput. Linguist",
"volume": "22",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "249--254",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jean Carletta. 1996. Assessing agreement on classifi- cation tasks: The kappa statistic. Comput. Linguist., 22(2):249-254.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Automatic Framenet-based annotation of conversational speech",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Bonaventura",
"middle": [],
"last": "Coppola",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Alessandro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Moschitti",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sara",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tonelli",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Giuseppe",
"middle": [],
"last": "Riccardi",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "73--76",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Bonaventura Coppola, Alessandro Moschitti, Sara Tonelli, and Giuseppe Riccardi. 2008. Automatic Framenet-based annotation of conversational speech. In 2008 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Work- shop, pages 73-76.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Probabilistic frame-semantic parsing",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Dipanjan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Das",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Nathan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schneider",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Desai",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Noah",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Smith",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "948--956",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dipanjan Das, Nathan Schneider, Desai Chen, and Noah A. Smith. 2010. Probabilistic frame-semantic parsing. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics, pages 948-956, Los Angeles, California. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Semisupervised frame-semantic parsing for unknown predicates",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Dipanjan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Das",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Noah",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Smith",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1435--1444",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dipanjan Das and Noah A Smith. 2011. Semi- supervised frame-semantic parsing for unknown predicates. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 1435-1444.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jacob",
"middle": [],
"last": "Devlin",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ming-Wei",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kenton",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lee",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kristina",
"middle": [],
"last": "Toutanova",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "",
"pages": "4171--4186",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/N19-1423"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language under- standing. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4171-4186, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "Frame assignment as word sense disambiguation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Katrin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Erk",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Proceedings of IWCS",
"volume": "6",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Katrin Erk. 2005. Frame assignment as word sense dis- ambiguation. In Proceedings of IWCS, volume 6.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Frame semantics and the nature of language",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Charles",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Fillmore",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1976,
"venue": "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences",
"volume": "280",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "20--32",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Charles J. Fillmore. 1976. Frame semantics and the na- ture of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280(1):20-32.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Frame semantics",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Charles",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Fillmore",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1982,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "111--137",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Charles J. Fillmore. 1982. Frame semantics, pages 111-137. Hanshin Publishing Co., Seoul, South Ko- rea.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "The official website for the FrameNet project",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Framenet",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2021,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2021--2023",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "FrameNet. 2021. The official website for the FrameNet project. https://framenet.icsi.berkeley. edu/fndrupal/. Accessed: 2021-02-03.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "Index of balanced accuracy: A performance measure for skewed class distributions",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Vicente",
"middle": [],
"last": "Garc\u00eda",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Alberto",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ram\u00f3n",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jos\u00e9 Salvador",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mollineda",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "S\u00e1nchez",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Iberian conference on pattern recognition and image analysis",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "441--448",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Vicente Garc\u00eda, Ram\u00f3n Alberto Mollineda, and Jos\u00e9 Salvador S\u00e1nchez. 2009. Index of balanced ac- curacy: A performance measure for skewed class distributions. In Iberian conference on pattern recognition and image analysis, pages 441-448. Springer.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "Out-of-domain FrameNet semantic role labeling",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Silvana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hartmann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ilia",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kuznetsov",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Teresa",
"middle": [],
"last": "Martin",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Iryna",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gurevych",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "",
"pages": "471--482",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Silvana Hartmann, Ilia Kuznetsov, Teresa Martin, and Iryna Gurevych. 2017. Out-of-domain FrameNet se- mantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers, pages 471-482, Valencia, Spain. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "Semantic frame identification with distributed word representations",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Karl",
"middle": [],
"last": "Moritz Hermann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dipanjan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Das",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jason",
"middle": [],
"last": "Weston",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kuzman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ganchev",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2014,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1448--1458",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.3115/v1/P14-1136"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Karl Moritz Hermann, Dipanjan Das, Jason Weston, and Kuzman Ganchev. 2014. Semantic frame iden- tification with distributed word representations. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1448-1458, Baltimore, Mary- land. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "SpaCy 2: Natural language understanding with Bloom embeddings, convolutional neural networks and incremental parsing",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Matthew",
"middle": [],
"last": "Honnibal",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ines",
"middle": [],
"last": "Montani",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Matthew Honnibal and Ines Montani. 2017. SpaCy 2: Natural language understanding with Bloom embed- dings, convolutional neural networks and incremen- tal parsing. To appear.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "LTH: Semantic structure extraction using nonprojective dependency trees",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Richard",
"middle": [],
"last": "Johansson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pierre",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nugues",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "227--230",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Richard Johansson and Pierre Nugues. 2007. LTH: Semantic structure extraction using nonprojective dependency trees. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007), pages 227-230, Prague, Czech Re- public. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF22": {
"ref_id": "b22",
"title": "Open-domain frame semantic parsing using transformers",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Aditya",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kalyanpur",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Or",
"middle": [],
"last": "Biran",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tom",
"middle": [],
"last": "Breloff",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jennifer",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chu-Carroll",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ariel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Diertani",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Owen",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rambow",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mark",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sammons",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Aditya Kalyanpur, Or Biran, Tom Breloff, Jennifer Chu-Carroll, Ariel Diertani, Owen Rambow, and Mark Sammons. 2020. Open-domain frame seman- tic parsing using transformers.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "TRADR project: Long-term humanrobot teaming for robot assisted disaster response. KI -K\u00fcnstliche Intelligenz",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ivana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Francis",
"middle": [],
"last": "Colas",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mario",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gianni",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Fiora",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pirri",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Joachim",
"middle": [],
"last": "De Greeff",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Koen",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hindriks",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mark",
"middle": [],
"last": "Neerincx",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tom\u00e1\u0161",
"middle": [],
"last": "Petter\u00f6gren",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Rainer",
"middle": [],
"last": "Svoboda",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Worst",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "",
"volume": "29",
"issue": "",
"pages": "193--201",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1007/s13218-015-0352-5"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ivana Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1, Francis Colas, Mario Gianni, Fiora Pirri, Joachim de Greeff, Koen Hindriks, Mark Neerincx, Petter\u00d6gren, Tom\u00e1\u0161 Svoboda, and Rainer Worst. 2015. TRADR project: Long-term human- robot teaming for robot assisted disaster response. KI -K\u00fcnstliche Intelligenz, 29(2):193-201.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "Imbalanced-learn: A Python toolbox to tackle the curse of imbalanced datasets in machine learning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Guillaume",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lema\u00eetre",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Fernando",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nogueira",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christos",
"middle": [
"K"
],
"last": "Aridas",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Journal of Machine Learning Research",
"volume": "18",
"issue": "17",
"pages": "1--5",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Guillaume Lema\u00eetre, Fernando Nogueira, and Chris- tos K. Aridas. 2017. Imbalanced-learn: A Python toolbox to tackle the curse of imbalanced datasets in machine learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18(17):1-5.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF25": {
"ref_id": "b25",
"title": "Meaning representation of null instantiated semantic roles in FrameNet",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Miriam",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Petruck",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Designing Meaning Representations",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "121--127",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/W19-3313"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Miriam R L Petruck. 2019. Meaning representation of null instantiated semantic roles in FrameNet. In Pro- ceedings of the First International Workshop on De- signing Meaning Representations, pages 121-127, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Lin- guistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF26": {
"ref_id": "b26",
"title": "Active Annotation in the LUNA Italian Corpus of Spontaneous Dialogues",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Christian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Raymond",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kepa Joseba",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rodriguez",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Giuseppe",
"middle": [],
"last": "Riccardi",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "LREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Christian Raymond, Kepa Joseba Rodriguez, and Giuseppe Riccardi. 2008. Active Annotation in the LUNA Italian Corpus of Spontaneous Dialogues. In LREC.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF27": {
"ref_id": "b27",
"title": "Semantic frame induction as a community detection problem",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Eug\u00e9nio",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ribeiro",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andreia",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sofia Teixeira",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ricardo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ribeiro",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "David",
"middle": [],
"last": "Martins De Matos",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Eug\u00e9nio Ribeiro, Andreia Sofia Teixeira, Ricardo Ribeiro, and David Martins de Matos. 2020. Seman- tic frame induction as a community detection prob- lem.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF28": {
"ref_id": "b28",
"title": "FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Josef",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ruppenhofer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michael",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ellsworth",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Miriam",
"middle": [
"R L"
],
"last": "Petruck",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christopher",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "Johnson",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "International Computer Science Institute",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Josef Ruppenhofer, Michael Ellsworth, Miriam R.L. Petruck, Christopher R. Johnson, and Jan Schef- fczyk. 2006. FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, California. Distributed with the FrameNet data.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF29": {
"ref_id": "b29",
"title": "Reference in team communication for robot-assisted disaster response: An initial analysis",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Natalia",
"middle": [],
"last": "Skachkova",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ivana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kruijff-Korbayova",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Computational Models of Reference, Anaphora and Coreference",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "122--132",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Natalia Skachkova and Ivana Kruijff-Korbayova. 2020. Reference in team communication for robot-assisted disaster response: An initial analysis. In Proceed- ings of the Third Workshop on Computational Mod- els of Reference, Anaphora and Coreference, pages 122-132, Barcelona, Spain (online). Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF30": {
"ref_id": "b30",
"title": "Positional attention-based frame identification with BERT: A deep learning approach to target disambiguation and semantic frame selection",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Sang-Sang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jin-Cheon",
"middle": [],
"last": "Na",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"arXiv": [
"arXiv:1910.14549"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Sang-Sang Tan and Jin-Cheon Na. 2019. Positional attention-based frame identification with BERT: A deep learning approach to target disambiguation and semantic frame selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.14549.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF31": {
"ref_id": "b31",
"title": "Classification assessment methods. Applied Computing and Informatics",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Alaa",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tharwat",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Alaa Tharwat. 2020. Classification assessment meth- ods. Applied Computing and Informatics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF32": {
"ref_id": "b32",
"title": "Rapid FrameNet annotation of spoken conversation transcripts",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jeremy",
"middle": [],
"last": "Trione",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Frederic",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bechet",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Alexis",
"middle": [],
"last": "Benoit Favre",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nasr",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 11th Joint ACL-ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation (ISA-11)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jeremy Trione, Frederic Bechet, Benoit Favre, and Alexis Nasr. 2015. Rapid FrameNet annotation of spoken conversation transcripts. In Proceedings of the 11th Joint ACL-ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation (ISA-11), London, UK. Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF33": {
"ref_id": "b33",
"title": "Team communication processing and process analytics for supporting robot-assisted emergency response",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Christian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Willms",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Constantin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Houy",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jana-Rebecca",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rehse",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Peter",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fettke",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ivana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "2019 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "216--221",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Christian Willms, Constantin Houy, Jana-Rebecca Rehse, Peter Fettke, and Ivana Kruijff-Korbayov\u00e1. 2019. Team communication processing and process analytics for supporting robot-assisted emergency re- sponse. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR), pages 216-221. IEEE.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF34": {
"ref_id": "b34",
"title": "HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Thomas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wolf",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lysandre",
"middle": [],
"last": "Debut",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Victor",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sanh",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Julien",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chaumond",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Clement",
"middle": [],
"last": "Delangue",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Anthony",
"middle": [],
"last": "Moi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pierric",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cistac",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tim",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rault",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R\u00e9mi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Louf",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Morgan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Funtowicz",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Joe",
"middle": [],
"last": "Davison",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sam",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shleifer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Clara",
"middle": [],
"last": "Patrick Von Platen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yacine",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ma",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Julien",
"middle": [],
"last": "Jernite",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Canwen",
"middle": [],
"last": "Plu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Teven",
"middle": [
"Le"
],
"last": "Xu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sylvain",
"middle": [],
"last": "Scao",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mariama",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gugger",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Quentin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Drame",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Alexander",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Lhoest",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rush",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pier- ric Cistac, Tim Rault, R\u00e9mi Louf, Morgan Funtow- icz, Joe Davison, Sam Shleifer, Patrick von Platen, Clara Ma, Yacine Jernite, Julien Plu, Canwen Xu, Teven Le Scao, Sylvain Gugger, Mariama Drame, Quentin Lhoest, and Alexander M. Rush. 2020. HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art natu- ral language processing.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF35": {
"ref_id": "b35",
"title": "A joint sequential and relational model for frame-semantic parsing",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Bishan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tom",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mitchell",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1247--1256",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Bishan Yang and Tom Mitchell. 2017. A joint sequen- tial and relational model for frame-semantic parsing. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empiri- cal Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1247-1256.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF36": {
"ref_id": "b36",
"title": "TSABCNN: Two-stage attention-based convolutional neural network for frame identification",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Hongyan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhao",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ru",
"middle": [],
"last": "Li",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Fei",
"middle": [],
"last": "Duan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Zepeng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Shaoru",
"middle": [],
"last": "Guo",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Chinese Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing Based on Naturally Annotated Big Data",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "289--301",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hongyan Zhao, Ru Li, Fei Duan, Zepeng Wu, and Shaoru Guo. 2018. TSABCNN: Two-stage attention-based convolutional neural network for frame identification. In Chinese Computational Lin- guistics and Natural Language Processing Based on Naturally Annotated Big Data, pages 289-301, Cham. Springer International Publishing.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF37": {
"ref_id": "b37",
"title": "Andreas from Markus, come in. Communication by protocol OP Yes, Andreas come in. Communication by protocol",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Andreas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tl",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "TL Andreas, Andreas from Markus, come in. Communication by protocol OP Yes, Andreas come in. Communication by protocol ...",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF38": {
"ref_id": "b38",
"title": "OP Yes, for information, I am ready",
"authors": [],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "OP Yes, for information, I am ready [EHM].",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF39": {
"ref_id": "b39",
"title": "Activity ready state Shall I go ahead with my search command, or begin? Desirable event",
"authors": [],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Activity ready state Shall I go ahead with my search command, or begin? Desirable event",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF40": {
"ref_id": "b40",
"title": "Shall I go ahead with my search command, or begin? Activity ongoing",
"authors": [],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Shall I go ahead with my search command, or begin? Activity ongoing",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF41": {
"ref_id": "b41",
"title": "Shall I go ahead with my search command, or begin? Activity start TL Yes, begin immediately without possible -least possible time delay, to [EHM] have a higher chance for person rescue",
"authors": [],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Shall I go ahead with my search command, or begin? Activity start TL Yes, begin immediately without possible -least possible time delay, to [EHM] have a higher chance for person rescue. Activity start",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF42": {
"ref_id": "b42",
"title": "Yes, begin immediately without possible -least possible time delay, to [EHM] have a higher chance for person rescue. Likelihood OP Yes, understood, I begin with the search. Communication response message Yes, understood, I begin with the search. Activity start",
"authors": [],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Yes, begin immediately without possible -least possible time delay, to [EHM] have a higher chance for person rescue. Likelihood OP Yes, understood, I begin with the search. Communication response message Yes, understood, I begin with the search. Activity start ...",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF43": {
"ref_id": "b43",
"title": "Communication by protocol OP Yes, Andreas, come in. Communication by protocol TL [ent=unk.skippable] Are there already any noteworthy findings?",
"authors": [],
"year": null,
"venue": "TL Andreas from Markus",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "TL Andreas from Markus, come in. [ent=unk.skippable] Communication by protocol OP Yes, Andreas, come in. Communication by protocol TL [ent=unk.skippable] Are there already any noteworthy find- ings? [ent=unk.skippable]",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF44": {
"ref_id": "b44",
"title": "Communication response message Negative. No noteworthy findings",
"authors": [
{
"first": "O",
"middle": [
"P"
],
"last": "Existence",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Negative",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Existence OP Negative. No noteworthy findings. [ent=unk.skippable] Communication response message Negative. No noteworthy findings. [ent=unk.skippable] Existence TL Yes, understood. Communication response message [ent=unk.skippable] Daniel, Daniel from Markus, come in. Communication by protocol [ent=unk.skippable] Andreas from Markus, come in. Communication by protocol ...",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF45": {
"ref_id": "b45",
"title": "Markus from Andreas, come in. Communication by protocol TL Andreas, come in. Communication by protocol OP On first floor in the smoke found a barrel, green",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Andreas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Op",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "OP Andreas, Markus from Andreas, come in. Communication by protocol TL Andreas, come in. Communication by protocol OP On first floor in the smoke found a barrel, green, labeled as environmentally hazardous material.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "Learning curves of English and German frame classifies with blind sampling",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF1": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "Traning and validation losses of the original PAFIBERT model B German frame classifier with lexical features",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF2": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "Adding lexical features (dashed borders) to PAFIBERT Adding lexical and discourse features (dashed borders) to PAFIBERT",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"TABREF2": {
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "TRADR corpus overview",
"html": null
},
"TABREF4": {
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "Training, validation & test data sizes",
"html": null
},
"TABREF6": {
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "",
"html": null
},
"TABREF8": {
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "",
"html": null
},
"TABREF10": {
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "Blind random sampling from FrameNet",
"html": null
},
"TABREF12": {
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "",
"html": null
},
"TABREF14": {
"content": "<table><tr><td>Sampling type</td><td>PRE REC</td><td>F1</td><td>IBA0.1</td></tr><tr><td>Balancing:</td><td colspan=\"3\">0.89 0.89 0.88 0.88</td></tr><tr><td>2,375 inst. (\u2248 96%)</td><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>Equal:</td><td colspan=\"3\">0.91 0.91 0.90 0.90</td></tr><tr><td>611 inst. (\u2248 25%)</td><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>Basic model (DE)</td><td colspan=\"3\">0.84 0.84 0.83 0.83</td></tr></table>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "Informed random sampling from FrameNet However, asTable 8demonstrates, in case of the German frame classifier the informed sampling clearly has a positive influence. Its significance was confirmed by the corresponding McNemar's tests. Balancing sampling helps to reduce the number of silly errors, as well as errors caused by ambiguous target expressions. The latter reduction is mostly due to a better recognition of ambiguous target expressions represented by single tokens, reflexive verbs and verbs with separable prefixes. The difference in performance between the balancing and equal sampling approaches was insignificant according to McNemar's test.",
"html": null
},
"TABREF15": {
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "Informed random sampling from SALSA",
"html": null
},
"TABREF17": {
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "Extra features: English frame classifier",
"html": null
},
"TABREF19": {
"content": "<table><tr><td>C Team communication example</td></tr></table>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "Extra features: German frame classifier",
"html": null
},
"TABREF20": {
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td>Fluidic motion</td></tr><tr><td/><td>Capability</td></tr><tr><td>Yeah. It is a 200 liter barrel, whether anything is leaking I</td><td>Becoming aware</td></tr><tr><td>cannot currently tell.</td><td/></tr><tr><td>TL [EHM] Any thermal emission?</td><td>Presence</td></tr><tr><td>OP No thermal emission.</td><td>Presence</td></tr><tr><td>TL Okay.</td><td/></tr></table>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "Locating TL Yeah, can you [unintelligible] whether anything is leaking? Capability Yeah, can you [unintelligible] whether anything is leaking? Fluidic motion OP Yeah. It is a 200 liter barrel, whether anything is leaking I cannot currently tell. Identity Yeah. It is a 200 liter barrel, whether anything is leaking I cannot currently tell. Yeah. It is a 200 liter barrel, whether anything is leaking I cannot currently tell. Priority on continuing person search.",
"html": null
},
"TABREF21": {
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td colspan=\"2\">Framework</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>Characteristic features</td><td>Erk (2005)</td><td>LTH (2007)</td><td>LUNA (2008)</td><td>SEMAFOR (2010)</td><td>Hermann et al. (2014)</td><td>SimpleFrameId (2017)</td><td>Open-Sesame (2017)</td><td>Yang & Mitchell (2017)</td><td>TSABCNN (2018)</td><td>PAFIBERT (2019)</td><td>Ribeiro et al. (2020)</td><td>Kalyanpur et al. (2020)</td></tr><tr><td>hand-crafted rules</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>hand-crafted features</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>kernels</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>parsing</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>embeddings</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>Naive Bayes classifier</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>SVM</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>conditional log-linear model</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>neural network</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>CRF</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>clustering</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>graph structure</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr></table>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "English TRADR dialogue annotated with semantic frames",
"html": null
},
"TABREF23": {
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"text": "Corpora comparison",
"html": null
}
}
}
} |