File size: 95,398 Bytes
6fa4bc9 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 |
{
"paper_id": "2020",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T08:06:27.460141Z"
},
"title": "OSACT4 Shared Task on Offensive Language Detection: Intensive Preprocessing-Based Approach",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Fatemah",
"middle": [],
"last": "Husain",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Kuwait University",
"location": {
"country": "State of Kuwait"
}
},
"email": "f.husain@ku.edu.kw"
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "The preprocessing phase is one of the key phases within the text classification pipeline. This study aims at investigating the impact of the preprocessing phase on text classification, specifically on offensive language and hate speech classification for Arabic text. The Arabic language used in social media is informal and written using Arabic dialects, which makes the text classification task very complex. Preprocessing helps in dimensionality reduction and removing useless content. We apply intensive preprocessing techniques to the dataset before processing it further and feeding it into the classification model. An intensive preprocessing-based approach demonstrates its significant impact on offensive language detection and hate speech detection shared tasks of the fourth workshop on Open-Source Arabic Corpora and Corpora Processing Tools (OSACT). Our team wins the third place (3 rd) in the Sub-Task A Offensive Language Detection division and wins the first place (1 st) in the Sub-Task B Hate Speech Detection division, with an F1 score of 89% and 95%, respectively, by providing the state-of-the-art performance in terms of F1, accuracy, recall, and precision for Arabic hate speech detection.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "2020",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "The preprocessing phase is one of the key phases within the text classification pipeline. This study aims at investigating the impact of the preprocessing phase on text classification, specifically on offensive language and hate speech classification for Arabic text. The Arabic language used in social media is informal and written using Arabic dialects, which makes the text classification task very complex. Preprocessing helps in dimensionality reduction and removing useless content. We apply intensive preprocessing techniques to the dataset before processing it further and feeding it into the classification model. An intensive preprocessing-based approach demonstrates its significant impact on offensive language detection and hate speech detection shared tasks of the fourth workshop on Open-Source Arabic Corpora and Corpora Processing Tools (OSACT). Our team wins the third place (3 rd) in the Sub-Task A Offensive Language Detection division and wins the first place (1 st) in the Sub-Task B Hate Speech Detection division, with an F1 score of 89% and 95%, respectively, by providing the state-of-the-art performance in terms of F1, accuracy, recall, and precision for Arabic hate speech detection.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Online offensive language detection is one of the most challenging text classification tasks to accomplish due to the ambiguity and informality of the language used in social media platforms. So far, online offensive language detection has been applied to various languages, such as English (Kwok and Wang, 2013; Davidson et al., 2017; Nobata et al., 2016; Pitsilis, Ramampiaro, Langseth, 2018) , German (Kent, 2018; Wiedemann et al., 2018) , Urdu (Mustafa et al., 2017) , Turkish (\u00d6zel et al., 2017) , Hindi (Bohra et al., 2018; Kapoor et al., 2018) , Danish (Derczynski, 2019) , and Arabic (Abozinadah, Mbaziira, and Jones, 2015; Mubarak, Darwish, and Magdy, 2017; Alakrot, Murray, and Nikolov, 2018; Mohaouchane, Mourhir, and Nikolov, 2019) . Regardless of the text language, a standard text classification pipeline consists of preprocessing, feature extraction, feature selection, and classification model. The preprocessing phase is the one that is the most distinguishable phase among the others based on the text language. Each language contains unique structures and rules, which need to be addressed using unique methods. We develop an intensive preprocessingbased classification model for Arabic offensive language detection. Among the participants of the fourth workshop on Open-Source Arabic Corpora and Corpora Processing Tools (OSACT) throughout the shared tasks, our team wins third place in Sub-Task A Offensive Language Detection division and wins first place in Sub-Task B Hate Speech Detection division.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 291,
"end": 312,
"text": "(Kwok and Wang, 2013;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF20"
},
{
"start": 313,
"end": 335,
"text": "Davidson et al., 2017;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF14"
},
{
"start": 336,
"end": 356,
"text": "Nobata et al., 2016;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
},
{
"start": 357,
"end": 394,
"text": "Pitsilis, Ramampiaro, Langseth, 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF28"
},
{
"start": 404,
"end": 416,
"text": "(Kent, 2018;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF19"
},
{
"start": 417,
"end": 440,
"text": "Wiedemann et al., 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
},
{
"start": 448,
"end": 470,
"text": "(Mustafa et al., 2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF24"
},
{
"start": 473,
"end": 500,
"text": "Turkish (\u00d6zel et al., 2017)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 509,
"end": 529,
"text": "(Bohra et al., 2018;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
},
{
"start": 530,
"end": 550,
"text": "Kapoor et al., 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF18"
},
{
"start": 560,
"end": 578,
"text": "(Derczynski, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
},
{
"start": 592,
"end": 631,
"text": "(Abozinadah, Mbaziira, and Jones, 2015;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 632,
"end": 666,
"text": "Mubarak, Darwish, and Magdy, 2017;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF23"
},
{
"start": 667,
"end": 702,
"text": "Alakrot, Murray, and Nikolov, 2018;",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 703,
"end": 743,
"text": "Mohaouchane, Mourhir, and Nikolov, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1."
},
{
"text": "Text that contains some form of abusive behavior, exhibiting actions with the intention of harming others, is known as offensive language. This abusive behavior could lead to disturbances, disrespect, harm, insults, and anger, thus affecting the harmony of conversations. Wiedemann et al. (2018) describe offensive language as \"threats and discrimination against people, swear words or blunt insults\" (p.1). Hate speech, aggressive content, cyberbullying, and toxic comments are all different forms of offensive content (Schmidt & Wiegand, 2017) . Figure 1 shows an example of an offensive tweet. Hate speech is one of the most common forms of offensive language. A text that is targeted towards a group of peoplewith the intent to cause harm, violence, or social chaos is known as hate speech (Derczynski, 2019) . Davidson et al. (2017) define hate speech as \"a language that is used to express hatred towards a targeted group or is intended to be derogatory, to humiliate, or to insult the members of the group\" (p.1). Figure 2 illustrates an example of a hate speech tweet. Developing classification models, which can automatically detect offensive language and hate speech, is a very challenging task due to the following factors: a) the informality of the language used in posts from social media shows posts are usually written using symbols, short forms, and slang that are difficult to semantically process and understand by algorithms; b) the variation and the diversity of the Arabic language dialects and forms; and c) the small sample size of offensive samples; for example, in the dataset used in this study, only 5% of the tweets are labeled as hate speech and 19% of the tweets are labeled as offensive. We apply multiple preprocessing techniques to address the challenges of Arabic offensive language detection.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 272,
"end": 295,
"text": "Wiedemann et al. (2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
},
{
"start": 520,
"end": 545,
"text": "(Schmidt & Wiegand, 2017)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 794,
"end": 812,
"text": "(Derczynski, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
},
{
"start": 815,
"end": 837,
"text": "Davidson et al. (2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF14"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 548,
"end": 556,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
},
{
"start": 1021,
"end": 1029,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": "FIGREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1."
},
{
"text": "The preprocessing techniques include conversion of emoticons and emoji, conversion of hashtags, normalizing different forms of Arabic letters, normalizing Arabic dialects to Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), normalizing words by categorization, and basic cleaning processes. These intensive preprocessing techniques report valuable influence on the system performance. We train a Support Vector Machine (SVM)based classifier using character-based count vectorizer (2-5 characters). Results report an F1 score of 89.82% for the offensive language detection model and 95.16% for the hate speech detection model.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1."
},
{
"text": "In the rest of this paper, we organize the content as follows: Section 2 discusses related work of Arabic offensive language detection on social media, Section 3 introduces data description, details of preprocessing, and the methodology of our models, and experimental results are discussed in Section 4. We also present the conclusion of our work at the end of the paper.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1."
},
{
"text": "There are multiple studies investigating offensive Arabic tweets to identify abusive Twitter accounts (Abozinadah, Mbaziira, & Jones, 2015; Abozinadah & Jones, 2017; Abozinadah, 2017) . Abozinadah, Mbaziira, and Jones (2015) construct an initial dataset starting with 500 Twitter accounts based on a set of Arabic swear words. Then, they check the most recent 50 tweets, profile pictures, and hashtags for each of these 500 Twitter accounts in order to reach a dataset of 350,000 Twitter accounts and 1,300,000 tweets with balanced classes; half were labelled abusive while the other half were labelled as non-abusive. Next, they use three types of features, including profile-based features, tweet-based features, and social graph features to train three classifiers: Naive Bayes (NB), SVM, and Decision Tree (J48). The results show that the NB-based classifier outperforms the other classifiers when used with 100 features and 10 tweets for each account with an accuracy score of 85% (Abozinadah, Mbaziira, & Jones, 2015; Abozinadah, 2017) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 102,
"end": 139,
"text": "(Abozinadah, Mbaziira, & Jones, 2015;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 140,
"end": 165,
"text": "Abozinadah & Jones, 2017;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 166,
"end": 183,
"text": "Abozinadah, 2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
},
{
"start": 186,
"end": 224,
"text": "Abozinadah, Mbaziira, and Jones (2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 986,
"end": 1023,
"text": "(Abozinadah, Mbaziira, & Jones, 2015;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 1024,
"end": 1041,
"text": "Abozinadah, 2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "Another approach for detecting offensive language was adopted by Mubarak, Darwish, and Magdy (2017) for the purpose of detecting vulgar and pornographic obscene speech in Arabic social media by applying a simple obscene phrases list-based approach. They use a Twitter dataset consisting of 175 million tweets to extract a list of seed words for obscene phrases through manual assessment. Then, they utilize the list to construct 3 sublists of obscene words, phrases, and hashtags using multiple measurements, such as the Log Odds Ratio (LOR) for unigrams and bigrams. Intrinsic and extrinsic evaluations were used to evaluate these lists. The intrinsic evaluation consists of manual coding for a list of 100 words that are randomly selected from each list to be marked as either obscene or not. The extrinsic evaluation consists of recall, precision, and F1 measures using a dataset that they developed for the purpose of this evaluation. They then select 10 Egyptian Twitter users from the top controversial users. After that, they extract 100 tweets with at least 10 replies for each user. The final dataset has 100 original tweets and 1,000 replies tweets. Each tweet along with its replies were submitted to CrowdFlower to become coded by three annotators from Egypt using three classes: obscene, offensive, and clean; the inter-annotator agreement is 84%. As a result, they develop a linear match model for each labeled tweet; for example, if a match with a phrase from the list occurs, then, it will then predict a label of obscenity to that tweet. The results among all lists show a highest F1 score of 60%, which demonstrate that a list-based approach is very limited and not a good choice for an obscene detection system. Arabic language has also been studied also by Nikolov (2018a, 2018b) for automatic detection of offensive language. They construct a dataset from YouTube comments based on selecting channels that have controversial videos about celebrities. Their final dataset includes 167,549 comments posted by 84,354 users, and 87,388 replies posted by 24,039 users from 150 YouTube videos (Alakrot, Murray, & Nikolov, 2018a) . Two labels were used for the classes: positive to label offensive comments and negative to label ones that are not offensive (Alakrot, Murray, & Nikolov, 2018a) . They train an SVM-based classifier using two features: character ngram (n= 1-5) and word-level features. The results show the best performance when using the SVM-based classifier with 10-fold cross validation and word-level features with 90.05% of an accuracy score (Alakrot, Murray, & Nikolov, 2018b ).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 65,
"end": 99,
"text": "Mubarak, Darwish, and Magdy (2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF23"
},
{
"start": 1777,
"end": 1799,
"text": "Nikolov (2018a, 2018b)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 2108,
"end": 2143,
"text": "(Alakrot, Murray, & Nikolov, 2018a)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
},
{
"start": 2271,
"end": 2306,
"text": "(Alakrot, Murray, & Nikolov, 2018a)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
},
{
"start": 2575,
"end": 2609,
"text": "(Alakrot, Murray, & Nikolov, 2018b",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "Mohaouchane, Mourhir, and Nikolov (2019) explore multiple deep learning models to classify offensive Arabic language for YouTube comments using the same dataset developed by Alakrot, Murray, and Nikolov (2018a) . They create 300-dimension word embedding using AraVec, which is an Arabic word embedding tool, trained on Twitter dataset and skip-gram model. Four deep learning models were evaluated for classifying offensive comments, including Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM), Bi-LSTM with an attention mechanism, and a combined model of CNN and LSTM. The results demonstrate an overall better performance for CNN with a highest accuracy score of 87.84%, a precision score of 86.10%, and an F1 score of 84.05%, while the combined CNN-LSTM model shows a better recall score of 83.46% (Mohaouchane, Mourhir, & Nikolov, 2019) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 174,
"end": 210,
"text": "Alakrot, Murray, and Nikolov (2018a)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
},
{
"start": 833,
"end": 872,
"text": "(Mohaouchane, Mourhir, & Nikolov, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "To our knowledge, the only Arabic hate speech detection studies are the studies of Mishra (2018, 2019) and the study of Chowdhury et al. (2019) , which investigate religious hate speech in Arabic language for Twitter data, both using the same dataset. Albadi, Kurdi, and Mishra (2018) develop a logistic regression-based model and an SVM-based model using a character n-gram feature (n= 1 to 4), and a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) based on the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) with the Twitter Continuous Bag-of-Word (CBOW) 300-dimension embedding model provided by AraVec, batches of size 32, and Adam as the optimizer. Their findings have indicated that for some religious minorities in the Middle East -Jews, Atheists, and Shia-almost half of the tweets that were mentioning these minorities were referring to them within a hate speech content (Albadi, Kurdi, & Mishra, 2018) . Furthermore, results report best performance when using the GRU-based model with an F1 score of 77% (Albadi, Kurdi, & Mishra, 2018) . Albadi, Kurdi, and Mishra (2019) enhance the same GRU-based model with additional temporal, users, and content features in another study, then report the state-of-the-art performance in terms of a recall score of 84%. Chowdhury et al (2019) extend previous studies done by Mishra (2018, 2019) to investigate the effects of community interactions and social representations in detecting religious hate speech in the Arabic Twitter sphere. They use multiple features, including word embedding, node embedding, sentence representation, and character n-gram features (n = 1 -4). Several classification models were explored using multiple combinations of features, such as GRU, logistic regression, SVM, LSTM, Bi-LSTM, CNN and Bi-GRU in addition to combining multiple models, using self-attention mechanisms, and using Node2Vec criteria. Therefore, results have shown a high accuracy score of 81% that was obtained by the model containing a combination of Bi-GRU, CNN, and NODE2VEC. While displaying the best F1 score, recall and precision were recorded by the model that combined LSTM, CNN and NODE2VEC: 89%, 78%, and 86% respectively. Previous studies focus on features extraction and classification model, while we focus more on text preprocessing. The preprocessing steps we follow in this study are not identical to any of the preprocessing steps of the previous studies.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 83,
"end": 102,
"text": "Mishra (2018, 2019)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 120,
"end": 143,
"text": "Chowdhury et al. (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
},
{
"start": 843,
"end": 874,
"text": "(Albadi, Kurdi, & Mishra, 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
},
{
"start": 977,
"end": 1008,
"text": "(Albadi, Kurdi, & Mishra, 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
},
{
"start": 1011,
"end": 1043,
"text": "Albadi, Kurdi, and Mishra (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 1284,
"end": 1303,
"text": "Mishra (2018, 2019)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "The shared task of the fourth workshop on Open-Source Arabic Corpora and Corpora Processing Tools (OSACT) in Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) 2020 provides Twitter dataset for offensive language detection in Arabic language. The main goal of this shared task is to identify and categorize Arabic offensive language in Twitter. The organizers collect tweets through Twitter API and annotate them hierarchically regarding offensive language and offense type. The task is divided into two subtasks: a) detecting if a post is offensive or not offensive; and b) identifying offensive content type of an offensive post as hate speech or not hate speech.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dataset Description",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "The provider of the dataset performs some preprocessing to ensure the privacy of users. Twitter user mentions were substituted by \"@USER\", URLs had simply been substituted by \"URL\", and empty lines were replaced by \"<LF>\".",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dataset Description",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "The shared task issues the dataset in three different parts, training dataset, development dataset and testing dataset. The summary of datasets distribution is presented in Table 1 . Training dataset and development dataset are provided with their actual labeled, while the testing dataset consists of 2,000 unlabeled tweets for competition evaluation purposes. The training dataset consists of 6,839 tweets with 1,371 offensive tweets and 350 hate speech tweets. The development dataset consists of 1,000 tweets with 179 offensive tweets and 44 hate speech tweets. We explore multiple characteristics of the dataset including most frequent emoji, emoticons, and words. The most frequent emoticons and emoji are very similar in both classes. Table 2 and Table 3 show the top 5 most frequent emoji and emoticons for both not offensive and offensive classes, respectively. Most frequent words are also very similar in both classes. Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the most frequent words for both not offensive class and offensive class, respectively. ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 173,
"end": 182,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
},
{
"start": 744,
"end": 763,
"text": "Table 2 and Table 3",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
},
{
"start": 932,
"end": 940,
"text": "Figure 3",
"ref_id": "FIGREF2"
},
{
"start": 945,
"end": 953,
"text": "Figure 4",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dataset Description",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Emoji % Emoticon % 18% :< 44% \u2764 12% :) 23% 5% :( 16% 5% ;D 6% \u2665 4% :D 6%",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Labels",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Emoji and emoticons are often used to convey feelings and attitude, which is very valuable to the task of offensive detection. Knowing some contextual information about the author of the post can provide insight into the textual content of the post. Moreover, a previous study converts an emoji to a textual label, and uses it to provide sentimental features to train a classifier for aggression detection, thus reporting better performance than the other model that does not consider emoji conversion (Orasan, 2018) . Thus, we consider converting emoji and emoticons to an Arabic textual label that describe the content of them. To have a more robust system that can scale and cover more emoji and emoticons, we then extract the entire set of emoji defined by Unicode.org (Unicode Organization, n.d.). Beautifulsoup4 4.8.2, a Python package for parsing HTML and XML documents, was used to scrape the emoji list available at the Unicode Organization website. We extract the Unicode and name of each emoji using Beutifulsoup4. The emoji list contains 1,374 emoji. The Unicode Organization website provides textual descriptions for each emoji written in English. We extract these textual descriptions, then, we use Translate 1.0.7 python package to translate them into Arabic language. Thus, during preprocessing of the data, each emoji is converted to its Arabic description. For example, is replaced by \" \u202b\u0648\ufe9f\ufbab\u202c \u202b\ufedf\ufeb4\ufe8e\u0646\u202c \u202b\ufee3\ufeca\u202c \u202b\"\ufbfe\ufed0\ufee4\ufeb0\u202c . In addition, we manually construct an emoticons list that includes a total of 140 emoticons with their textual descriptions in Arabic language. For example, \":-X\" is replaced by \" \u202b\u0627\ufedf\ufee0\ufeb4\ufe8e\u0646\u202c \u202b\ufee3\ufecc\ufed8\ufeee\u062f\u202c \". Next, we analyze the description phrase as a regular textual phrase in tweets so that it could maintain its semantic meaning after removing the original emoji and emoticon.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 502,
"end": 516,
"text": "(Orasan, 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Emoji and Emoticon Conversion",
"sec_num": "3.2.1"
},
{
"text": "The Arabic dialects have various forms, based on geography and social class (Habash, 2010) . Arabic dialects are the Arabic languages that have often been used in usergenerated contents such as Twitter. Habash (2010) categorizes the Arabic dialects into seven dialects: Gulf, Egyptian, Iraqi, North African, Yemenite, Levantine, and Maltese Arabic, which is not always considered one of the Arabic dialects. It is very crucial to consider the variations among different dialects when detecting offensive language, as some words that have exactly the same pronunciation and spelling might have different meanings. For example, the word \u202b\ufecb\ufe8e\ufed3\ufbff\ufe94\"\u202c -Afiah\" means health in Gulf, Egyptian, Iraqi, and Levantine dialects ; however, it also means fire in Moroccan Arabic. We try to solve the variation in dialects by a dimensionality reduction approach. We reduce the dimensionality of the data by normalizing the variation of dialects for a set of nouns to be converted from dialectal Arabic to MSA. For example, the variations of the word boy, \u202b,\"\u0631\ufe9f\ufede\"\u202c \u202b,\"\u0632\ufedf\ufee4\ufe94\"\u202c and \u202b\"\u0632\u0648\u0644\"\u202c are converted to \u202b.\"\u0648\ufedf\ufeaa\"\u202c The set of nouns is manually constructed based on manual insepction for a sample of the dataset and based on our own experience as native Arabic speakers.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 76,
"end": 90,
"text": "(Habash, 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
},
{
"start": 203,
"end": 216,
"text": "Habash (2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Arabic Dialects Normalization",
"sec_num": "3.2.2"
},
{
"text": "Normalizing and reducing the dimensionality can improve the performance of the model. From our manual inspection for a sample of tweets from the dataset, we notice that it is very common to mention name of animals among the hate speech tweets. Thus, we manually create a list of the most common animal names used in different Arabic dialects, such as \u202b\ufedb\ufee0\ufe90\"\u202c -dog\", \u202b\ufea7\ufee8\ufeb0\ufbfe\ufeae\"\u202c -pig\", \u202b\ufea3\ufbff\ufe94\"\u202c -snake\". The list considers the variation in dialects in animal names, such as the word cat in MSA is \"Qetta/ \u202b\ufed7\ufec4\ufe94\u202c \", while in Egyptian it is \"Otta/ \u202b,\"\u0623\u0637\ufe94\u202c in Levantine it is \"Bisse/\u202b,\"\ufe91\ufeb4\ufe94\u202c in Gulf it is \"Qatwa/\u202b,\"\ufed7\ufec4\ufeee\u0629\u202c in Moroccan it is \"Qetta/ \u202b\ufed7\ufec4\ufe94\u202c \", in Iraqi it is \"Bazzuna/\u202b,\"\ufe91\ufeb0\u0648\ufee7\ufe94\u202c and in Yamani it is \"demah/\u202b.\"\u062f\ufee3\ufe94\u202c In addition to the variation in dialects, the list includes variations of the same animal names, such as the female name, male name, plural name. Thus, for the word cat, we include singular female name \"Qetta/ \u202b\ufed7\ufec4\ufe94\u202c \", singular male name \"Qett/ \u202b\ufed7\ufec2\u202c \", two female name \"Qettatan/ \u202b\ufed7\ufec4\u202c \u202b\ufe98\ufe8e\u0646\u202c \", two male name \"Qettan/ \u202b\ufed7\ufec4\u202c \u202b\ufe8e\u0646\u202c \", and plural name \"Qettat/ \u202b\ufed7\ufec4\u202c \u202b\ufec2\u202c \". The list contains a total of 335 lexicons. All animal names that are listed and occurred in the dataset were converted to the word animal in Arabic \u202b.\"\ufea3\ufbff\ufeee\u0627\u0646\"\u202c Accordingly, all animal names that are included in tweets are reduced to only one word.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Words Categorization",
"sec_num": "3.2.3"
},
{
"text": "Arabic letters can be written in various format depending on the location of the letter within the word. We normalize Alif \u202b\u0625\u060c\u0622\u060c\u0623(\u202c to \u202b\u0627\u202c ), Alif Maqsura \u202b\u0626\u060c\u064a(\u202c to \u202b,)\u0649\u202c and Ta Marbouta \u202b\u0629(\u202c to \u202b.)\u0647\u202c Letters that were repeated more than two times within a word were reduced to two times only.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Letters Normalization",
"sec_num": "3.2.4"
},
{
"text": "Hashtags are commonly used in Twitter to highlight important phrases within the tweet. Thus, it is very important to consider hashtags during the preprocessing phase to convert hashtags into a meaningful format. We remove the \"#\" symbol and replace \"_\" by a space. For example, the hashtag \u202b\"\u0627\ufedf\ufbad\ufefc\u0644_\u0627\ufedf\ufe98\ufecc\ufe8e\u0648\u0646#\"\u202c is converted to \u202b\u0627\ufedf\ufbad\ufefc\u0644\"\u202c \u202b\u0627\u202c \u202b\ufedf\ufe98\ufecc\ufe8e\u0648\u0646\u202c \", which is easier for the system to understand and process.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Hashtag Segmentation",
"sec_num": "3.2.5"
},
{
"text": "Tweets were filtered to remove numbers, kashida, HTML tags, more than one space, three or more repetitions of any character, and some symbols or terms (e.g., \" _\", '\"', \"\\\"\", \"'s\", \"...\", \"!\", \"?\", \"I\", \"@USER\", \"USER\", \"URL\", \".\", \";\", \":\", \"/\", \"\\\\\", \", \", \"#\", \"@\", \"$\", \"&\", \")\", \"(\", \"\\\"). We borrow the list of Arabic stopwords defined by Alrefaie",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Miscellaneous",
"sec_num": "3.2.6"
},
{
"text": "5% 10% 15% 20% \u202b\ufbfe\ufe8e\u202c \u202b\ufdf2\u202c \u202b\u0627\ufee7\ufe96\u202c \u202b\u0627\ufedf\ufee0\ufef2\u202c \u202b\u0627\ufe91\ufee6\u202c (2016), which contains 750 stopwords. Furthermore, we remove diacritics that were used in tweets containing text from the holy Qur'an or poetry.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "0%",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "As can be noticed from Table 1 , the classes are highly imbalanced, with only 5% hate speech tweets and 19% offensive tweets. we try to solve the problem with the imbalanced distribution of classes by using up-sampling. The original training dataset has 7,000 tweets with a first label hierarchy of 1,410 offensive tweets and 5,590 not offensive tweets. After up-sampling, the number of tweets for each class, offensive tweets and not offensive tweets, becomes 5,590. The second label hierarchy is sharply imbalanced, the original training dataset consists of 361 hate speech tweets and 6639 not hate speech tweet. After up-sampling, the number of tweets for each class, hate speech tweets and not hate speech tweets, becomes 6,639. We use resample function from Python scikit-learn library to implement upsampling. ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 23,
"end": 30,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Upsampling",
"sec_num": "3.2.7"
},
{
"text": "We use two features in training the models, which consists of character-based count vectorizer and TF-IDF vectorizer, both with 2 to 5 characters. Previous studies highlight the importance of using character-based features over wordbased features for offensive language detection because it is a language independent feature that can work with misspelling errors or obfuscating offensive words, which are commonly practiced on social media posts (Bohra et al., 2018; Nobata et al., 2016) . Both features are implemented using Python scikit-learn library.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 446,
"end": 466,
"text": "(Bohra et al., 2018;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
},
{
"start": 467,
"end": 487,
"text": "Nobata et al., 2016)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Feature Extraction",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "We explore the effect of each preprocessing technique on the performance of the model before applying them to the final models. Previous studies on offensive language detection report high performance when using an SVMbased classifier (Abozinadah and Jones, 2017; Schmidt and Wiegand, 2017; Albadi, Kurdi, and Mishra, 2018) . The SVM classifier focuses on maximizing the margin, the distance of the closest points to the hyperplane that separate between instances of classes using a linear function (Goodfellow, Bengio, and Courville, 2016) . Thus, we decide to be in-line with the findings from earlier studies and use the linear SVM-based classifier in this step trained using the first label hierarchy of the dataset; offensive or not offensive, for the purpose of this exploration task. We did not use the testing dataset during this step. The training dataset used to train the models and the development dataset used to evaluate the models. During this preliminary modeling phase, two main goals were targeted. The first goal is to identify if count vectorizer outperforms TF-IDF vectorizer or not. To accomplish this goal, we trained two SVM-based models using the raw dataset without performing any preprocessing technique, one model applies the count vectorizer and the other one applies the TF-IDF vectorizer. Results are shown in Table 5 . The TF-IDF vectorizer is 2% better than the count vectorizer in precision score. However, having a comprehensive measurement that consider multiple factors in evaluating the model is very important. The dataset is highly imbalanced, so we consider F1 score in evaluating the performance rather than accuracy. The accuracy score is often gives misleading results in similar situation with imbalanced dataset. F1 score is the harmonic mean for recall and precision. The count vectorizer outperforms the TF-IDF vectorizer by 2% in F1 score. This finding is consistent with Wiedeman et al. 2018finding, which reports the unsuitability of TF-IDF vectorizer over twitter datasets because tweets are very short, making it not an optimal source for IDF estimations. Thus, we consider adopting the count vectorizer as the feature for the rest of the models. The second goal of this preliminary modeling phase is to evaluate each preprocessing technique separately and measure their effects on the performance. Table 6 presents the results from the preliminary preprocessing exploration models. Only two preprocessing techniques were merged; hashtags segmentation and miscellaneous cleaning processes due to their relatedness and similarity in term of platform specific attributes. Preliminary results illustrate the contribution of each preprocessing technique to the performance of the model; however, we also expect to have different results when used on larger dataset and when used for hate speech detection. The results report the highest contribution in term of F1 score to letters normalization, followed by dialect normalization and word categorization, then, emoji and emoticon conversion, miscellaneous cleaning and hashtag segmentation, and finally, upsampling. The results demonstrate some issues with the upsampling technique, it reduces F1 score from 79%, as it shown in Table 5 , to 71%. Consequently, we decide to apply all the preprocessing techniques except upsampling for the main models. ",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 235,
"end": 263,
"text": "(Abozinadah and Jones, 2017;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 264,
"end": 290,
"text": "Schmidt and Wiegand, 2017;",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 291,
"end": 323,
"text": "Albadi, Kurdi, and Mishra, 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
},
{
"start": 499,
"end": 540,
"text": "(Goodfellow, Bengio, and Courville, 2016)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 1341,
"end": 1348,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": "TABREF7"
},
{
"start": 2352,
"end": 2359,
"text": "Table 6",
"ref_id": "TABREF9"
},
{
"start": 3227,
"end": 3234,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": "TABREF7"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Preliminary Models",
"sec_num": "3.4.1"
},
{
"text": "The baseline models include two linear SVM-based models, both trained on dataset without any sort of preprocessing technique and using a count vectorizer with 2 to 5 characters. The first baseline model classifies tweets to either Offensive (OFF) or Not Offensive (NOT_OFF), while the second one classifies tweets to either Hate Speech (HS) or Not Hate Speech (NOT_HS). To assess our goal in investigating the effect of preprocessing on offensive detection and hate speech detection, we use the same feature and classifier for baseline models and main models. All Models are implemented using Python scikit-learn library.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Baseline Models",
"sec_num": "3.4.2"
},
{
"text": "The main model for offensive language detection, which classifies tweets to either offensive (OFF) or not offensive (NOT_OFF), is a Linear SVM-based classifier. The model is trained on full preprocessed tweets that have been preprocessed using all techniques mentioned earlier; conversion of emoticons and emoji, conversion of hashtags, normalizing different forms of Arabic letters, normalizing Arabic dialects to MSA, normalizing words by categorization, and other miscellaneous cleaning processes. As we mentioned earlier, the feature used in training the model is the character-based count vectorizer with 2 to 5 characters. The model is implemented using Python scikitlearn library.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Sub-Task A Model : Offensive Language Detection",
"sec_num": "3.4.3"
},
{
"text": "The same exact model of Sub-Task A is used for Sub-Task B, including the same preprocessing and feature extraction techniques. However, the model classifies tweets to either hate speech (HS) or not hate speech (NOT_HS). Table 7 shows the results of performance evaluation for the baseline model and the main model for offensive language detection task, and Table 8 shows the results for hate speech detection task. The baseline models were evaluated using the development dataset while the main models were evaluated using the testing dataset through the shared task competition evaluators. The dataset is highly imbalanced, thus, the accuracy score might not be very informative to evaluate the performance. The F1 score increased from 79% for the baseline model before preprocessing to 89% after preprocessing for Sub-Task A for offensive detection, which was ranked the 3rd place. For Sub-Task B for hate speech detection, F1 score increased sharply from 67% to 95%, which was ranked the 1st place.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 220,
"end": 227,
"text": "Table 7",
"ref_id": "TABREF11"
},
{
"start": 357,
"end": 364,
"text": "Table 8",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Sub-Task B Model : Hate Speech Detection",
"sec_num": "3.4.4"
},
{
"text": "The most noticeable point from the tables is that in Sub-Task B results are better than in Sub-Task A, given the fact that the class distribution is more skewed than that of Sub-Task A and the number of training instance is much smaller than Sub-Task A. This interesting point demonstrates how data preprocessing adds value to the performance, even for hate speech class that is very rare. Table 8 : Performance evaluation of hate speech detection task",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 390,
"end": 397,
"text": "Table 8",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment Results",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "The preprocessing phase is one of the key phases within the text classification pipeline, including offensive language and hate speech classification. The ambiguity and informality of social media language increase the complexity of achieving high classification performance, particularly for Arabic text that has multiple dialects. Our study shows the competitive results obtained for offensive language detection and hate speech detection by using intensive preprocessing techniques to filter and clean the dataset before feeding it into the rest of the phases for the text classification pipeline. Moreover, results report the significant impacts of preprocessing on a very challenging task, such as the hate speech classification, with very small sample size of 5% from the overall dataset.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5."
},
{
"text": "In the future, we hope to enhance the available studies of offensive language detection and hate speech detection by investigating our preprocessing techniques using some deep learning models. Another future direction is to use more advanced features in training the model, such as word embedding.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5."
}
],
"back_matter": [],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Detection of Abusive Accounts with Arabic Tweets",
"authors": [
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Abozinadah",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mbaziira",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Jones",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "International Journal of Knowledge Engineering",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.7763/IJKE.2015.V1.19"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Abozinadah, E. , Mbaziira, A., and Jones, J. (2015). Detection of Abusive Accounts with Arabic Tweets. International Journal of Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 2. DOI: 10.7763/IJKE.2015.V1.19",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "Detecting Abusive Arabic Language Twitter Accounts Using a Multidimensional Analysis Model",
"authors": [
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Abozinadah",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Abozinadah, E. (2017). Detecting Abusive Arabic Language Twitter Accounts Using a Multidimensional Analysis Model.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "A Statistical Learning Approach to Detect Abusive Twitter Accounts",
"authors": [
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Abozinadah",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Jones",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis",
"volume": "130280",
"issue": "",
"pages": "6--13",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3093241.3093281"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Abozinadah, E., and Jones, J. (2017). A Statistical Learning Approach to Detect Abusive Twitter Accounts. Proceedings of the International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis, 130280, 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3093241.3093281",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Dataset Construction for the Detection of Anti-Social Behaviour in Online Communication in Arabic",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Alakrot",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Murray",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [
"S"
],
"last": "Nikolov",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Procedia Computer Science",
"volume": "142",
"issue": "",
"pages": "174--181",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.473"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Alakrot, A., Murray, L., and Nikolov, N. S. (2018a). Dataset Construction for the Detection of Anti- Social Behaviour in Online Communication in Arabic. Procedia Computer Science, 142, 174-181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018. 10.473",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Towards Accurate Detection of Offensive Language in Online Communication in Arabic",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Alakrot",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Murray",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [
"S"
],
"last": "Nikolov",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Procedia Computer Science",
"volume": "142",
"issue": "",
"pages": "315--320",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Alakrot, A., Murray, L., and Nikolov, N. S. (2018b). Towards Accurate Detection of Offensive Language in Online Communication in Arabic. Procedia Computer Science, 142, 315-320.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Are they Our Brothers? Analysis and Detection of Religious Hate Speech in the Arabic Twittersphere",
"authors": [
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Albadi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kurdi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mishra",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Albadi, N., Kurdi, M., and Mishra, S. (2018). Are they Our Brothers? Analysis and Detection of Religious Hate Speech in the Arabic Twittersphere. 2018",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)",
"authors": [],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "69--76",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 69-76.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Investigating the effect of combining GRU neural networks with handcrafted features for religious hatred detection on Arabic Twitter space",
"authors": [
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Albadi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kurdi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mishra",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Soc. Netw. Anal. Min",
"volume": "9",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Albadi, N., Kurdi, M., and Mishra, S. (2019). Investigating the effect of combining GRU neural networks with handcrafted features for religious hatred detection on Arabic Twitter space. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 41.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Arabic-stop-words",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Alrefaie",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Alrefaie, M. (2016). Arabic-stop-words [Github Repository]. Retrieved on January 24, 2020 from https://github.com/mohataher/arabic-stop-words",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "A Dataset of Hindi-English Code-Mixed Social Media Text for Hate Speech Detection",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bohra",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Vijay",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "V",
"middle": [],
"last": "Singh",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [
"S"
],
"last": "Akhtar",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shrivastava",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/W18-1105"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Bohra, A., Vijay, D., Singh, V., Akhtar, S. S., & Shrivastava, M. (2018). A Dataset of Hindi-English Code-Mixed Social Media Text for Hate Speech Detection. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-1105",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "ARHNet -Leveraging Community Interaction for Detection of Religious Hate Speech in Arabic",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chowdhury",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Didolkar",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sawhney",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shah",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "273--280",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Chowdhury, A., Didolkar, A., Sawhney, R., and Shah, R. (2019). ARHNet -Leveraging Community Interaction for Detection of Religious Hate Speech in Arabic. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop. Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy, 273-280.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language",
"authors": [
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Davidson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Warmsley",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Macy",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "I",
"middle": [],
"last": "Weber",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media About offensive content. arXiv.org",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., Macy, M., and Weber, I. (2017). Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language. AAAI Publications, Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media About offensive content. arXiv.org. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/2074118430/",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Offensive Language and Hate Speech Detection for Danish",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Derczynski",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Derczynski, L. (2019). Offensive Language and Hate Speech Detection for Danish. arXiv.org. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/2273023012/",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "Deep Learning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "I",
"middle": [],
"last": "Goodfellow",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bengio",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Courville",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Goodfellow, I., Bengio, B., Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT press. Retrieved from http://www.deeplearningbook.org/contents/ml.html",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "Introduction to Arabic natural language processing",
"authors": [
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Habash",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "",
"volume": "3",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--185",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Habash, N. (2010). Introduction to Arabic natural language processing (Vol. 3, pp. 1-185).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "Mind Your Language: Abuse and Offense Detection for Code-Switched Languages",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kapoor",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Y",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kumar",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rajput",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shah",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kumaraguru",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zimmermann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Kapoor, R., Kumar, Y., Rajput, K., Shah, R., Kumaraguru, P., & Zimmermann, R. (2018). Mind Your Language: Abuse and Offense Detection for Code- Switched Languages. arXiv.org. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/2111970667/",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "German Hate Speech Detection on Twitter",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kent",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "14th Conference on Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Kent, S. (2018). German Hate Speech Detection on Twitter. Proceedings of GermEval 2018, 14th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2018) Vienna, Austria -September 21.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "Locate the Hate: Detecting Tweets Against Blacks",
"authors": [
{
"first": "I",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kwok",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Wang",
"middle": [],
"last": "",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Y",
"middle": [],
"last": "",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1621--1622",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Kwok, I., and Wang, Y. (2013). Locate the Hate: Detecting Tweets Against Blacks. Proceedings of the Twenty- Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.1621-1622",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "Detecting Offensive Language on Arabic Social Media using Deep Learning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mohaouchane",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mourhir",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [
"S"
],
"last": "Nikolov",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Mohaouchane, H., Mourhir, A., and Nikolov, N. S. (2019). Detecting Offensive Language on Arabic Social Media using Deep Learning, (December).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "Abusive Language Detection on Arabic Social Media",
"authors": [
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mubarak",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Darwish",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "W",
"middle": [],
"last": "Magdy",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "52--56",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Mubarak, H., Darwish, K., and Magdy, W. (2017). Abusive Language Detection on Arabic Social Media. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2017. pp. 52-56.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "Early Detection of Controversial Urdu Speeches from Social Media. Data Science and Pattern Recognition, Ubiquitous International, Volume1, Number2",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mustafa",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nawaz",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ferzund",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lali",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shahzad",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Viger",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Mustafa, R., Nawaz, M., Ferzund, J., Lali, M., Shahzad, B., and ournier-Viger, P. (2017). Early Detection of Controversial Urdu Speeches from Social Media. Data Science and Pattern Recognition, Ubiquitous International, Volume1, Number2. ISSN 2520-4165.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF25": {
"ref_id": "b25",
"title": "Abusive language detection in online user content",
"authors": [
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nobata",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tetreault",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Thomas",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Y",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mehdad",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Chang",
"middle": [],
"last": "",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Y",
"middle": [],
"last": "",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "145--153",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Nobata, C., Tetreault, J., Thomas, A., Mehdad, Y., and Chang, Y. (2016). Abusive language detection in online user content. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web, pp. 145-153. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2016",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF26": {
"ref_id": "b26",
"title": "Aggressive language identification using word embeddings and sentiment features",
"authors": [
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [],
"last": "Orasan",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the First Workshop on Trolling, Aggression and Cyberbullying",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Orasan, C. (2018). Aggressive language identification using word embeddings and sentiment features. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Trolling, Aggression and Cyberbullying. Association for Computational Linguistics, http://hdl.handle.net/2436/621749",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF27": {
"ref_id": "b27",
"title": "Detection of cyberbullying on social media messages in Turkish",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ozel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sarac",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Akdemir",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Aksu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Computer Science and Engineering",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "366--370",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1109/UBMK.2017.8093411"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ozel, S., Sarac, E., Akdemir, S., and Aksu, H. (2017). Detection of cyberbullying on social media messages in Turkish. 2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), 366- 370. https://doi.org/10.1109/UBMK.2017.8093411",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF28": {
"ref_id": "b28",
"title": "Effective hate-speech detection in Twitter data using recurrent neural networks",
"authors": [
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pitsilis",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ramampiaro",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Langseth",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Applied Intelligence",
"volume": "48",
"issue": "12",
"pages": "4730--4742",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Pitsilis, G., Ramampiaro, H., and Langseth, H. (2018). Effective hate-speech detection in Twitter data using recurrent neural networks. Applied Intelligence, 48(12), pp. 4730-4742.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF30": {
"ref_id": "b30",
"title": "Transfer Learning from LDA to BiLSTM-CNN for Offensive Language Detection in Twitter",
"authors": [
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wiedemann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ruppert",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Jindal",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [],
"last": "Biemann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Wiedemann, G., Ruppert, E., Jindal, R., and Biemann, C. (2018). Transfer Learning from LDA to BiLSTM- CNN for Offensive Language Detection in Twitter.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"num": null,
"text": "Example for an offensive tweet.",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null
},
"FIGREF1": {
"num": null,
"text": "Example for a hate speech tweet.",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null
},
"FIGREF2": {
"num": null,
"text": "Most frequent 5 words in not offensive tweets",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null
},
"TABREF1": {
"html": null,
"text": "",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>"
},
"TABREF2": {
"html": null,
"text": "The top 5 most frequent emoji and emoticons for not offensive tweets",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td>Emoji</td><td>%</td><td>Emoticon</td><td>%</td></tr><tr><td/><td>38.87%</td><td>;D</td><td>40%</td></tr><tr><td/><td>8.52%</td><td>:<</td><td>33.33%</td></tr><tr><td>\u2764</td><td>3.83%</td><td>:(</td><td>13.33%</td></tr><tr><td/><td>3.74%</td><td>:)</td><td>6.67%</td></tr><tr><td/><td>2.43%</td><td>d:</td><td>6.67%</td></tr></table>"
},
"TABREF3": {
"html": null,
"text": "The top 5 most frequent emoji and emoticons for offensive tweets",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>"
},
"TABREF4": {
"html": null,
"text": "illustrates example of tweets before preprocessing and after preprocessing.",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td>Tweet Before Cleaning</td><td/><td colspan=\"2\">Tweet After Cleaning</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">\u202b\ufe9b\ufe8e\ufbfe\ufeae\u202c \u202b\ufeb7\ufecc\ufeae\u202c \u202b\ufe91\ufeee\u202c \u202b\ufbfe\ufe8e\u202c \u202b\ufecb\ufee4\ufeae\u0631\u0631\u0631\u0631\u0631\u0631\u0631\u064a\u202c \u202b\ufbfe\ufe8e\u202c</td><td colspan=\"2\">\u202b\u0627\ufedf\ufe92\ufedc\ufe8e\u0621\u202c \u202b\u0648\ufe9f\ufbab\u202c</td><td>\u202b\ufe9b\ufe8e\u066e\ufeae\u202c \u202b\ufeb7\ufecc\ufeae\u202c \u202b\ufe91\ufeee\u202c \u202b\u066e\ufe8e\u202c \u202b\ufecb\ufee4\ufeae\u0631\u0649\u202c \u202b\u066e\ufe8e\u202c</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td colspan=\"2\">\u202b\ufe91\ufebc\ufeee\u062a\u202c \u202b\u0627\ufedf\ufe92\ufedc\ufe8e\u0621\u202c \u202b\u0648\ufe9f\ufbab\u202c</td><td>\u202b\ufecb\ufe8e\u0644\u202c \u202b\ufe91\ufebc\ufeee\u062a\u202c</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td>\u202b\u0648\ufe9f\ufbab\u202c</td><td>\u202b\ufecb\ufe8e\u0644\u202c \u202b\ufe91\ufebc\ufeee\u062a\u202c \u202b\u0627\ufedf\ufe92\ufedc\ufe8e\u0621\u202c \u202b\u0648\ufe9f\ufbab\u202c</td><td>\u202b\ufecb\ufe8e\u0644\u202c</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td>\u202b\ufed7\ufee0\ufe90\u202c</td><td>\u202b\u0627\ufebb\ufed4\ufeae\u202c \u202b\ufed7\ufee0\ufe90\u202c</td><td>\u202b\ufecb\ufe8e\u0644\u202c \u202b\ufe91\ufebc\ufeee\u062a\u202c \u202b\u0627\ufedf\ufe92\ufedc\ufe8e\u0621\u202c</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td/><td>\u202b\u0627\ufebb\ufed4\ufeae\u202c \u202b\ufed7\ufee0\ufe90\u202c</td><td>\u202b\u0627\ufebb\ufed4\ufeae\u202c \u202b\ufed7\ufee0\ufe90\u202c</td><td>\u202b\u0627\ufebb\ufed4\ufeae\u202c</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">@USER: \u202b\ufbfe\ufe8e\u202c \u202b\ufeb7\ufecc\ufe90\u202c \u202b\ufbfe\ufe8e\u202c \u202b\u0627\ufee7\ufe8e\ufee7\ufbff\ufbab\u202c \u202b\ufe91\ufec4\ufee0\ufeee\u202c</td><td colspan=\"2\">\u202b\u0648\u066e\ufefc\u202c \u202b\u0627\ufee7\ufebc\ufeae\u0627\ufed3\ufef0\u202c \u202b\u066e\ufe8e\u202c \u202b\ufeb7\ufecc\ufe90\u202c \u202b\u066e\ufe8e\u202c \u202b\u0627\ufee7\ufe8e\ufee7\u066e\ufbab\u202c \u202b\ufe91\ufec4\ufee0\ufeee\u202c</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">\u202b\ufecb\ufbff\ufeb8\ufedc\ufee2\u202c \u202b\ufebb\ufed4\ufeee\u0641\u202c \u202b\ufecb\ufee0\ufef0\u202c \u202b\u0648\ufbfe\ufefc\u202c \u202b\u0627\ufee7\ufebc\ufeae\u0627\ufed3\ufef2\u202c</td><td/><td>\u202b\u0648\ufe91\ufee8\ufeb0\ufbfe\ufee8\ufedc\ufee2\u202c</td><td>\u202b\ufecb\u066e\ufeb8\ufedc\ufee2\u202c \u202b\ufebb\ufed4\ufeee\u0641\u202c</td></tr><tr><td>\u202b\ufee8\ufeb0\ufbfe\ufee8\ufedc\ufee2\u202c</td><td>\u202b\u0648\ufe91\u202c</td><td/></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">RT @USER: \u202b\ufe97\ufe92\ufeaa\u0623\u202c \u202b\ufee3\ufee4\ufedc\ufee6\u202c \u202b\ufedb\ufe8e\u0646\u202c \u202b\ufee3\ufe8e\u202c</td><td colspan=\"2\">\u202b\ufea3\u066e\ufeee\u0627\u0646\u202c \u202b\u066e\ufe8e\u202c \u202b\ufe97\ufe92\ufeaa\u066e\ufede\u202c \u202b\ufe97\ufea8\ufeb4\ufeae\u202c \u202b\ufe91\ufeaa\u0644\u202c \u202b\ufe91\u066e\ufbab\u202c \u202b\ufe97\ufe92\ufeaa\u0627\u202c \u202b\ufee3\ufee4\ufedc\ufee6\u202c</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">\u202b\ufbfe\ufe8e\ufe91\ufee6\u202c \u202b\ufea3\ufee4\ufe8e\u0631\u202c \u202b\ufbfe\ufe8e\u202c \u202b\ufe97\ufe92\ufeaa\ufbfe\ufede\u202c \u202b\ufe97\ufea8\ufeb4\ufeae\u202c \u202b\ufee3\ufe8e\u202c \u202b\ufe91\ufeaa\u0644\u202c \u202b\ufe91\ufbff\ufbab\u202c</td><td/><td>\u202b\ufecf\ufe92\u066e\ufef0\u202c \u202b\u066e\ufe8e\u202c \u202b\ufea3\u066e\ufeee\u0627\u0646\u202c \u202b\u066e\ufe8e\ufe91\ufee6\u202c</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">\u202b\ufecf\ufe92\ufbff\ufbff\ufbff\ufbff\ufef2\u202c \u202b\ufbfe\ufe8e\u202c \u202b\u0627\ufedf\ufea4\ufee4\ufe8e\u0631\u202c</td><td/></tr></table>"
},
"TABREF5": {
"html": null,
"text": "Examples of tweets before preprocessing and after preprocessing",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>"
},
"TABREF7": {
"html": null,
"text": "",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td>: Performance results for preliminary models</td></tr><tr><td>based on features</td></tr></table>"
},
"TABREF9": {
"html": null,
"text": "Preliminary performance evaluation results from each preprocessing technique on offensive detection",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>"
},
"TABREF11": {
"html": null,
"text": "Performance evaluation of offensive language detection task",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td>Model</td><td>Precision</td><td>Recall</td><td>F1</td><td>Accuracy</td></tr><tr><td>Baseline Model</td><td>74%</td><td>63%</td><td>67%</td><td>96%</td></tr><tr><td>Main Model</td><td>95%</td><td>95%</td><td>95%</td><td>95%</td></tr></table>"
}
}
}
} |