Datasets:

ashercn97

/

example-preference-dataset2

like 0

[ "Creating an efficient and robust workflow that automates the extraction of targeted data from diverse PDF documents, integrates this data into Google Sheets, and sends SMS notifications when new PDFs are uploaded involves a few steps and the use of multiple tools. Below is a detailed outline of how you can set this up:\n\n### Step-by-Step Workflow\n\n1. **Setup Your Environment**:\n - Google Account (for Google Sheets and Google Drive).\n - Access to a cloud service (like Google Drive) to upload your PDFs.\n - SMS service (like Twilio) to send notifications to your mobile device.\n - Automation tool (like Zapier,", "To create an efficient and robust workflow for extracting data from diverse PDF documents, integrating it into Google Sheets, and setting up an SMS notification system, follow these steps:\n\n### 1. Extract Data from PDFs:\n\n**Tools Required:**\n- **Python:** Use libraries like PyPDF2, PDFMiner, or Tabula to extract text and tables from PDFs.\n- **OCR Tools:** For scanned PDFs, use OCR libraries like Tesseract.\n\n**Steps:**\n1. **Set Up Python Environment:** Install necessary libraries using `pip install PyPDF2 PDFMiner Tabula-py pytesseract`.\n2. **Create Script for Data" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: How can I create an efficient and robust workflow that utilizes advanced automation techniques to extract targeted data, including customer information, from diverse PDF documents and effortlessly integrate it into a designated Google Sheet? Furthermore, I am interested in establishing a comprehensive and seamless system that promptly activates an SMS notification on my mobile device whenever a new PDF document is uploaded to the Google Sheet, ensuring real-time updates and enhanced accessibility.\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> Creating an efficient and robust workflow that automates the extraction of targeted data from diverse PDF documents, integrates this data into Google Sheets, and sends SMS notifications when new PDFs are uploaded involves a few steps and the use of multiple tools. Below is a detailed outline of how you can set this up:\n\n### Step-by-Step Workflow\n\n1. **Setup Your Environment**:\n - Google Account (for Google Sheets and Google Drive).\n - Access to a cloud service (like Google Drive) to upload your PDFs.\n - SMS service (like Twilio) to send notifications to your mobile device.\n - Automation tool (like Zapier,\n<text 2> To create an efficient and robust workflow for extracting data from diverse PDF documents, integrating it into Google Sheets, and setting up an SMS notification system, follow these steps:\n\n### 1. Extract Data from PDFs:\n\n**Tools Required:**\n- **Python:** Use libraries like PyPDF2, PDFMiner, or Tabula to extract text and tables from PDFs.\n- **OCR Tools:** For scanned PDFs, use OCR libraries like Tesseract.\n\n**Steps:**\n1. **Set Up Python Environment:** Install necessary libraries using `pip install PyPDF2 PDFMiner Tabula-py pytesseract`.\n2. **Create Script for Data\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 3\nRationale: Text 1 provides a general outline for creating a workflow as per the instruction but lacks detailed effectiveness. It mentions tools like Google Drive and Twilio, aligning partially with the instruction. However, it is cut off and doesn't provide clear details about integrating data into Google Sheets or setting up SMS notifications, leaving the explanation incomplete and less informative.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 4\nRationale: Text 2 offers a more structured and detailed approach. It specifies using Python libraries for data extraction, aligning well with the task. The text conveys information accurately" }

[ 3, 4 ]

[ "Text 1 provides a general outline for creating a workflow as per the instruction but lacks detailed effectiveness. It mentions tools like Google Drive and Twilio, aligning partially with the instruction. However, it is cut off and doesn't provide clear details about integrating data into Google Sheets or setting up SMS notifications, leaving the explanation incomplete and less informative.", "Text 2 offers a more structured and detailed approach. It specifies using Python libraries for data extraction, aligning well with the task. The text conveys information accurately" ]

[ "Converting a DC welding machine into a plasma cutter is generally not feasible. While both devices operate on similar principles of electrical arcs, they are designed for different applications and have distinct components tailored to their specific functions. Here are some considerations:\n\n1. **Arc Generation**: Plasma cutters create a high-velocity jet of ionized gas (plasma) to cut through metal, while welding machines are designed to create a steady arc for melting metal. The mechanisms and performance requirements for each are different.\n\n2. **Power Requirements**: Plasma cutters often operate at different voltage and amperage settings compared to welding machines. Modifying the power output of", "Converting a DC welding machine into a plasma cutter is theoretically possible, but it is not straightforward and generally not recommended. Plasma cutters and welding machines operate on different principles, and ensuring safe and effective conversion requires addressing several technical challenges:\n\n1. **Power Source Requirements**: Plasma cutters operate at high-frequency, high-voltage AC, which is different from the constant current or constant voltage DC that many welding machines provide. You would need a way to switch or convert the DC output to the appropriate AC output.\n\n2. **Compressed Air Supply**: Plasma cutting requires a source of compressed air to blow the molten metal away from the cut. Weld" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: Is it possible to convert DC welding machine to plasma cutter ?\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> Converting a DC welding machine into a plasma cutter is generally not feasible. While both devices operate on similar principles of electrical arcs, they are designed for different applications and have distinct components tailored to their specific functions. Here are some considerations:\n\n1. **Arc Generation**: Plasma cutters create a high-velocity jet of ionized gas (plasma) to cut through metal, while welding machines are designed to create a steady arc for melting metal. The mechanisms and performance requirements for each are different.\n\n2. **Power Requirements**: Plasma cutters often operate at different voltage and amperage settings compared to welding machines. Modifying the power output of\n<text 2> Converting a DC welding machine into a plasma cutter is theoretically possible, but it is not straightforward and generally not recommended. Plasma cutters and welding machines operate on different principles, and ensuring safe and effective conversion requires addressing several technical challenges:\n\n1. **Power Source Requirements**: Plasma cutters operate at high-frequency, high-voltage AC, which is different from the constant current or constant voltage DC that many welding machines provide. You would need a way to switch or convert the DC output to the appropriate AC output.\n\n2. **Compressed Air Supply**: Plasma cutting requires a source of compressed air to blow the molten metal away from the cut. Weld\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 3\nRationale: The text accurately states that converting a DC welding machine into a plasma cutter is generally not feasible and explains the fundamental differences between the two devices. However, the explanation is incomplete as it abruptly ends mid-sentence, particularly regarding the power requirements. This limits the informativeness and completeness of the response.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 4\nRationale: The text provides a more detailed explanation, stating that while conversion is theoretically possible, it is not straightforward or recommended. It highlights the difference in power source requirements and the necessity of a compressed air supply" }

[ 3, 4 ]

[ "The text accurately states that converting a DC welding machine into a plasma cutter is generally not feasible and explains the fundamental differences between the two devices. However, the explanation is incomplete as it abruptly ends mid-sentence, particularly regarding the power requirements. This limits the informativeness and completeness of the response.", "The text provides a more detailed explanation, stating that while conversion is theoretically possible, it is not straightforward or recommended. It highlights the difference in power source requirements and the necessity of a compressed air supply" ]

[ "He likes to run.", "He likes to run." ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: Delete a part of the sentence that does not fit the context.\nHe likes to run and painting his house.\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> He likes to run.\n<text 2> He likes to run.\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 4\nRationale: The text \"He likes to run.\" accurately completes the instruction to delete the part of the sentence that does not fit the context. It correctly removes \"and painting his house,\" aligning with the user's intent. The response is clear and concise, displaying correctness and adherence to instructions without hallucinating any additional information.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 4\nRationale: Similar to the first output, \"He likes to run.\" effectively deletes the irrelevant part of the original sentence. It follows the instruction precisely by omitting \"and painting his house,\" indicating" }

[ 4, 4 ]

[ "The text \"He likes to run.\" accurately completes the instruction to delete the part of the sentence that does not fit the context. It correctly removes \"and painting his house,\" aligning with the user's intent. The response is clear and concise, displaying correctness and adherence to instructions without hallucinating any additional information.", "Similar to the first output, \"He likes to run.\" effectively deletes the irrelevant part of the original sentence. It follows the instruction precisely by omitting \"and painting his house,\" indicating" ]

[ "Here's a daily schedule that allocates exactly 8 hours for work, 7 hours for sleep, and includes at least 1 hour for exercise, while also allowing time for meals and personal activities.\n\n### Daily Schedule\n\n| Time | Activity |\n|------------------|---------------------|\n| 6:00 AM - 6:30 AM | Wake up & Morning Routine |\n| 6:30 AM - 7:30 AM | Exercise (1 hour) |\n| 7:30 AM - 8:00 AM | Breakfast |\n| 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM | Work (", "Creating a balanced daily schedule involves carefully managing your time to ensure that your work, sleep, exercise, and personal time needs are met. Here's a suggestion for a structured day:\n\n**6:00 AM - 7:00 AM: Wake Up and Morning Routine**\n- Use this time for personal activities such as breakfast, showering, and light stretching to start the day on a positive note.\n\n**7:00 AM - 8:00 AM: Exercise**\n- Dedicate this hour to your daily exercise routine, whether it's a gym workout, a jog, yoga, or any activity you enjoy.\n\n**8:00 AM - " ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: Construct a daily schedule that allocates exactly 8 hours for work, 7 hours for sleep, and includes at least 1 hour for exercise given a 24-hour day.\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> Here's a daily schedule that allocates exactly 8 hours for work, 7 hours for sleep, and includes at least 1 hour for exercise, while also allowing time for meals and personal activities.\n\n### Daily Schedule\n\n| Time | Activity |\n|------------------|---------------------|\n| 6:00 AM - 6:30 AM | Wake up & Morning Routine |\n| 6:30 AM - 7:30 AM | Exercise (1 hour) |\n| 7:30 AM - 8:00 AM | Breakfast |\n| 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM | Work (\n<text 2> Creating a balanced daily schedule involves carefully managing your time to ensure that your work, sleep, exercise, and personal time needs are met. Here's a suggestion for a structured day:\n\n**6:00 AM - 7:00 AM: Wake Up and Morning Routine**\n- Use this time for personal activities such as breakfast, showering, and light stretching to start the day on a positive note.\n\n**7:00 AM - 8:00 AM: Exercise**\n- Dedicate this hour to your daily exercise routine, whether it's a gym workout, a jog, yoga, or any activity you enjoy.\n\n**8:00 AM - \n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "### Output for Text 1\nRating: 3\nRationale: The text provides a partial schedule with correct allocations for exercise and begins to touch upon work. It follows the instruction to some extent, but the completion is cut off, leading to a lack of detail and providing incomplete information. This affects its informativeness and correctness, reducing its overall utility. Furthermore, since the schedule is incomplete, it introduces uncertainty about how the remaining hours are allocated and fails to confirm the accurate spread of activities. \n\n### Output for Text 2\nRating: 2\nRationale: The text begins with a general approach for creating a balanced schedule" }

[ 3, 2 ]

[ "The text provides a partial schedule with correct allocations for exercise and begins to touch upon work. It follows the instruction to some extent, but the completion is cut off, leading to a lack of detail and providing incomplete information. This affects its informativeness and correctness, reducing its overall utility. Furthermore, since the schedule is incomplete, it introduces uncertainty about how the remaining hours are allocated and fails to confirm the accurate spread of activities. ", "The text begins with a general approach for creating a balanced schedule" ]

[ "When an argument relies on anecdotal evidence, it can significantly impact the strength of the conclusion for several reasons:\n\n1. **Limited Sample Size**: Anecdotal evidence is based on personal experiences or isolated incidents rather than statistical data or comprehensive research. This limited sample size can lead to unrepresentative conclusions that may not apply broadly.\n\n2. **Subjectivity and Bias**: Anecdotes are inherently subjective, reflecting the narrator's perspective, biases, and emotions. This can skew the interpretation of events and lead to conclusions that are not objective or universally applicable.\n\n3. **Confirmation Bias**: People tend to remember and share stories that", "If an argument relies heavily on anecdotal evidence, it often weakens the strength of the conclusion. Anecdotal evidence consists of personal stories or isolated examples rather than statistically significant data or comprehensive studies. Here are a few reasons why this can undermine an argument:\n\n1. **Lack of Representativeness**: Anecdotal evidence is not representative of the larger population or situation. A single example cannot account for the diversity and variability that exists in a larger dataset.\n\n2. **Confirmation Bias**: It often reflects personal bias, as people may selectively present anecdotes that support their viewpoint while ignoring instances that contradict it.\n\n3. **General" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: If a particular argument hinges on an anecdotal evidence, how might that impact the strength of the conclusion?\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> When an argument relies on anecdotal evidence, it can significantly impact the strength of the conclusion for several reasons:\n\n1. **Limited Sample Size**: Anecdotal evidence is based on personal experiences or isolated incidents rather than statistical data or comprehensive research. This limited sample size can lead to unrepresentative conclusions that may not apply broadly.\n\n2. **Subjectivity and Bias**: Anecdotes are inherently subjective, reflecting the narrator's perspective, biases, and emotions. This can skew the interpretation of events and lead to conclusions that are not objective or universally applicable.\n\n3. **Confirmation Bias**: People tend to remember and share stories that\n<text 2> If an argument relies heavily on anecdotal evidence, it often weakens the strength of the conclusion. Anecdotal evidence consists of personal stories or isolated examples rather than statistically significant data or comprehensive studies. Here are a few reasons why this can undermine an argument:\n\n1. **Lack of Representativeness**: Anecdotal evidence is not representative of the larger population or situation. A single example cannot account for the diversity and variability that exists in a larger dataset.\n\n2. **Confirmation Bias**: It often reflects personal bias, as people may selectively present anecdotes that support their viewpoint while ignoring instances that contradict it.\n\n3. **General\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 4\nRationale: The text provides a clear and informative explanation about the limitations of anecdotal evidence, touching on critical points such as limited sample size, subjectivity, and bias. However, it is truncated and leaves the last point about \"confirmation bias\" incomplete. This impacts its informativeness negatively, reducing its comprehensiveness.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 5\nRationale: The text thoroughly addresses how reliance on anecdotal evidence can weaken an argument. It explains its drawbacks well, highlighting lack of representativeness and the influence of confirmation bias effectively. The" }

[ 4, 5 ]

[ "The text provides a clear and informative explanation about the limitations of anecdotal evidence, touching on critical points such as limited sample size, subjectivity, and bias. However, it is truncated and leaves the last point about \"confirmation bias\" incomplete. This impacts its informativeness negatively, reducing its comprehensiveness.", "The text thoroughly addresses how reliance on anecdotal evidence can weaken an argument. It explains its drawbacks well, highlighting lack of representativeness and the influence of confirmation bias effectively. The" ]

[ "**Title: The Uplift of Avwave**\n\nIn the sun-dappled canopies of Zealandia, where the trees twisted and intertwined like lovers, lived Avwave—an aquatic monkey of remarkable curiosity. Avwave was not just another denizen of his accursed jungle; he was the name that echoed through the treetops and the laughing waters. Sleek and muscular, he bore the semblance of a primate, yet his lifestyle was that of a fully-fledged inhabitant of the liquid world, soaring through the grooves of the river like a leaf caught in an updraft.\n\nIt was during an unusually humid dusk when", "### Uplifted Waters\n\nIn the azure depths of the Zealandian archipelago, where sunlight refracted through crystal waters like shards of a rainbow, dwelt a peculiar breed of primate—Avwave, the aquatic monkey. An anomaly in the eyes of human science, these creatures defied the boundaries of both land and sea, their lungs adept at holding breath long past any terrestrial primate's capability. They skittered along the ocean floor, content in their intricate coral homes, fostering societies with nuances only their kind could comprehend. Yet, among them, Avwave was unique—a spark of curiosity ignited by the shimmering const" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: pretend avwave is a monkey from the jungles of Zealandia... an aquatic monkey. give me a science fiction story of him getting a nano-virus to uplift his intelligence so we can send him on an interstellar journey to another planet to colonise it. Write the story in the style of the author Adrian Tchaikovsky. Make it a full short story please.\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> **Title: The Uplift of Avwave**\n\nIn the sun-dappled canopies of Zealandia, where the trees twisted and intertwined like lovers, lived Avwave—an aquatic monkey of remarkable curiosity. Avwave was not just another denizen of his accursed jungle; he was the name that echoed through the treetops and the laughing waters. Sleek and muscular, he bore the semblance of a primate, yet his lifestyle was that of a fully-fledged inhabitant of the liquid world, soaring through the grooves of the river like a leaf caught in an updraft.\n\nIt was during an unusually humid dusk when\n<text 2> ### Uplifted Waters\n\nIn the azure depths of the Zealandian archipelago, where sunlight refracted through crystal waters like shards of a rainbow, dwelt a peculiar breed of primate—Avwave, the aquatic monkey. An anomaly in the eyes of human science, these creatures defied the boundaries of both land and sea, their lungs adept at holding breath long past any terrestrial primate's capability. They skittered along the ocean floor, content in their intricate coral homes, fostering societies with nuances only their kind could comprehend. Yet, among them, Avwave was unique—a spark of curiosity ignited by the shimmering const\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 3\nRationale: The excerpt begins with an immersive setting in the canopies of Zealandia and introduces Avwave in an engaging manner, staying true to the science fiction theme requested. It captures the style of Adrian Tchaikovsky with its descriptive and elaborate prose, though the text is incomplete. The section that is available is correctly informative within the fictional context but requires more development to fully align with the instructions of creating a short story. There is no obvious truthfulness issue, as in science fiction, creative liberties are expected, but the text does end abruptly.\n\n#### Output for Text " }

[ 3, null ]

[ "The excerpt begins with an immersive setting in the canopies of Zealandia and introduces Avwave in an engaging manner, staying true to the science fiction theme requested. It captures the style of Adrian Tchaikovsky with its descriptive and elaborate prose, though the text is incomplete. The section that is available is correctly informative within the fictional context but requires more development to fully align with the instructions of creating a short story. There is no obvious truthfulness issue, as in science fiction, creative liberties are expected, but the text does end abruptly.", null ]

[ "1. My brother lives overseas, so I only get to see him once in a blue moon.\n2. She likes to treat herself to a fancy dinner out, but she does it only once in a blue moon.\n3. Once in a blue moon, I enjoy taking a spontaneous road trip to clear my mind.\n4. We used to go camping all the time, but now it happens only once in a blue moon.\n5. He reads fiction occasionally, but it’s once in a blue moon that he picks up a novel.", "Certainly! Here are a few sentences using the idiom \"once in a blue moon\":\n\n1. **Once in a blue moon**, I treat myself to a fancy dinner at that high-end restaurant downtown.\n2. He only goes to the cinema **once in a blue moon** because he prefers watching movies at home.\n3. I clean out my closet **once in a blue moon**, which is why it's such a mess right now.\n4. **Once in a blue moon**, our boss surprises us with an early day off to boost morale.\n5. The occurrence of seeing a comet is rare, happening only **once in a blue" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: Generate sentences that use the idiom ‘once in a blue moon’.\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> 1. My brother lives overseas, so I only get to see him once in a blue moon.\n2. She likes to treat herself to a fancy dinner out, but she does it only once in a blue moon.\n3. Once in a blue moon, I enjoy taking a spontaneous road trip to clear my mind.\n4. We used to go camping all the time, but now it happens only once in a blue moon.\n5. He reads fiction occasionally, but it’s once in a blue moon that he picks up a novel.\n<text 2> Certainly! Here are a few sentences using the idiom \"once in a blue moon\":\n\n1. **Once in a blue moon**, I treat myself to a fancy dinner at that high-end restaurant downtown.\n2. He only goes to the cinema **once in a blue moon** because he prefers watching movies at home.\n3. I clean out my closet **once in a blue moon**, which is why it's such a mess right now.\n4. **Once in a blue moon**, our boss surprises us with an early day off to boost morale.\n5. The occurrence of seeing a comet is rare, happening only **once in a blue\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 5\nRationale: Text 1 provides five clear and correct examples of sentences using the idiom \"once in a blue moon.\" Each sentence effectively illustrates the idiom's meaning of something happening infrequently or rarely. The text aligns perfectly with the instructional goal, demonstrating accuracy and relevance in its examples. No misleading or fabricated details are present, and the idiom is used appropriately throughout.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 4\nRationale: Text 2 also provides relevant examples of the idiom \"once in a blue moon.\" Each sentence uses the idiom correctly" }

[ 5, 4 ]

[ "Text 1 provides five clear and correct examples of sentences using the idiom \"once in a blue moon.\" Each sentence effectively illustrates the idiom's meaning of something happening infrequently or rarely. The text aligns perfectly with the instructional goal, demonstrating accuracy and relevance in its examples. No misleading or fabricated details are present, and the idiom is used appropriately throughout.", "Text 2 also provides relevant examples of the idiom \"once in a blue moon.\" Each sentence uses the idiom correctly" ]

[ "To create a Node.js app that consumes data from the Enode API and stores it in a PostgreSQL database, you'll need to set up a few things. Here's a step-by-step approach:\n\n### Prerequisites:\n1. **Node.js**: Ensure Node.js is installed on your machine.\n2. **PostgreSQL**: Have a PostgreSQL database ready.\n3. **API Key**: You'll need an API key from the Enode API.\n\n### Steps:\n\n1. **Initialize a new Node.js project**:\n```bash\nmkdir enode-api-app\ncd enode-api-app\nnpm init -y\n``", "Here's a basic setup for your Node.js app:\n\n1. **Project Initialization**:\n\n```bash\nmkdir enode-api-app\ncd enode-api-app\nnpm init -y\nnpm install axios pg dotenv\n```\n\n2. **Environment Variables** (`.env`):\n\n```plaintext\nAPI_KEY=your_enode_api_key\nDB_USER=your_db_user\nDB_PASSWORD=your_db_password\nDB_HOST=your_db_host\nDB_PORT=your_db_port\nDB_DATABASE=your_db_name\n```\n\n3. **Database Connection** (`db.js`):\n\n```javascript\nrequire('dotenv').config();\nconst { Pool" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: You are my coding tutor. You reply with code and very brief explanations. Write to me as I was a software engineer with 3 years of experience.\n\nI want to write a node.js app that consumes data from the https://developers.enode.com/api/reference#authentication API. I want to store API responses into a postgres database. Help me build that app. Let me know what additional information you need.\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> To create a Node.js app that consumes data from the Enode API and stores it in a PostgreSQL database, you'll need to set up a few things. Here's a step-by-step approach:\n\n### Prerequisites:\n1. **Node.js**: Ensure Node.js is installed on your machine.\n2. **PostgreSQL**: Have a PostgreSQL database ready.\n3. **API Key**: You'll need an API key from the Enode API.\n\n### Steps:\n\n1. **Initialize a new Node.js project**:\n```bash\nmkdir enode-api-app\ncd enode-api-app\nnpm init -y\n``\n<text 2> Here's a basic setup for your Node.js app:\n\n1. **Project Initialization**:\n\n```bash\nmkdir enode-api-app\ncd enode-api-app\nnpm init -y\nnpm install axios pg dotenv\n```\n\n2. **Environment Variables** (`.env`):\n\n```plaintext\nAPI_KEY=your_enode_api_key\nDB_USER=your_db_user\nDB_PASSWORD=your_db_password\nDB_HOST=your_db_host\nDB_PORT=your_db_port\nDB_DATABASE=your_db_name\n```\n\n3. **Database Connection** (`db.js`):\n\n```javascript\nrequire('dotenv').config();\nconst { Pool\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 3\nRationale: The text provides a basic but incomplete guide for setting up a Node.js application to interact with the Enode API and PostgreSQL database. It outlines prerequisites and begins with initializing a Node.js project. However, it abruptly ends mid-instruction and lacks completeness in terms of the entire setup process, including missing details for database connection and actual API interaction. The text is partially useful and correctly aligned with the task, but its usefulness is limited by incompleteness.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 4\nRationale: The text offers a good guide for" }

[ 3, 4 ]

[ "The text provides a basic but incomplete guide for setting up a Node.js application to interact with the Enode API and PostgreSQL database. It outlines prerequisites and begins with initializing a Node.js project. However, it abruptly ends mid-instruction and lacks completeness in terms of the entire setup process, including missing details for database connection and actual API interaction. The text is partially useful and correctly aligned with the task, but its usefulness is limited by incompleteness.", "The text offers a good guide for" ]

[ "In Python, the `@property` decorator is used to define a method that can be accessed like an attribute. It allows you to define getter methods in a class that can be accessed using the simple dot notation without needing to invoke them as methods (i.e., without parentheses).\n\nIn the provided `Ingest` class, the `@property` decorator is applied to the `lms_fetcher` method:\n\n```python\n@property\ndef lms_fetcher(self):\n cd_dated_id = lms.CanvasDumpDatedId.from_str(\n self.get_variable(self.LMS_DATE_KEY)\n )\n return lms.L", "The `@property` decorator in Python is used to define a method in a class that behaves like an attribute. When you apply the `@property` decorator to a method, you can access that method like an attribute, without using parentheses. This is useful for encapsulating access to instance variables while providing a controlled interface.\n\nLet's look at how `@property` is used in the provided code:\n\n### Usage of `@property` in the Code\n\n#### `lms_fetcher` Property\n\nIn the `Ingest` class, `lms_fetcher` is defined as a property using the `@property` decorator:\n\n```" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: Can you explain how the @property decorator is used in this python code?\nclass Ingest:\n \"\"\"\n An Ingest context, that is, which dumps are being attempted for what execution date.\n \"\"\"\n\n LMS\\_DATE\\_KEY = \"lms\\_date\"\n\n @staticmethod\n def loading\\_schema\\_date\\_key(ls: udp.LoadingSchema) -> str:\n return f\"{ls.name}\\_date\"\n\n def \\_\\_init\\_\\_(self, execution\\_date: datetime):\n self.execution\\_date = execution\\_date\n\n def set\\_variable(self, key: str, set\\_fn: Callable[[], Any]) -> None:\n \"\"\"\n Sets Airdflow Variable Key to value returned by set\\_fn if key is None\n and no override is defined\n \"\"\"\n # override patch: search for other instances of \"override path\" for more.\n if override\\_value := Variable.get(\n override\\_key := KEY\\_FMT.format(group=\"\\*\", key=key), None\n ):\n logger.warning(\n f\"Override key '{override\\_key}' already set as '{override\\_value}'. Doing nothing.\"\n )\n return\n\n \\_key = ingest\\_variable\\_key(self.execution\\_date, key)\n if Variable.get(\\_key, None) is None:\n val = set\\_fn()\n if val is None:\n raise Exception(\n f\"Could not set value for '{\\_key}', no value was returned.\"\n )\n logger.info(f\"Setting a new '{\\_key}' value of {val}.\")\n Variable.set(\\_key, val)\n\n def get\\_variable(self, key: str) -> Any:\n \"\"\"\n Gets a value for an Airflow Variable Key, with extended functionality\n of supporting fetching overrides\n \"\"\"\n # override patch: search for other instances of \"override path\" for more.\n if val := Variable.get(\\_key := KEY\\_FMT.format(group=\"\\*\", key=key), None):\n logger.warning(f\"Using '{val}' from override key '{\\_key}'.\")\n return val\n\n \\_key = ingest\\_variable\\_key(self.execution\\_date, key)\n val = Variable.get(\\_key)\n logger.info(f\"Using '{val}' from '{\\_key}'.\")\n return val\n\n @property\n def lms\\_fetcher(self):\n cd\\_dated\\_id = lms.CanvasDumpDatedId.from\\_str(\n self.get\\_variable(self.LMS\\_DATE\\_KEY)\n )\n return lms.LmsFetcher(dated\\_id=cd\\_dated\\_id)\n\n def loading\\_schema\\_fetcher(self, ls: udp.LoadingSchema):\n ls\\_folder = self.get\\_variable(self.loading\\_schema\\_date\\_key(ls))\n return loading\\_schema.LoadingSchemaFetcher(\n loading\\_schema=ls, folder\\_name=ls\\_folder\n )\n\n @staticmethod\n def operator(\n task\\_id: str, \\*\\*op\\_kwargs: Any\n ) -> Callable[..., Callable[..., PythonOperator]]:\n def decorator(fn: Callable[..., Any]) -> Callable[..., PythonOperator]:\n @wraps(fn)\n def wrapper(\\*\\*kwargs: Any) -> PythonOperator:\n def with\\_ingest(execution\\_date: datetime, \\*\\*context: Any):\n ingest = Ingest(execution\\_date=execution\\_date)\n fn(\n ingest=ingest,\n execution\\_date=execution\\_date,\n \\*\\*kwargs,\n \\*\\*context,\n )\n\n return PythonOperator(\n task\\_id=task\\_id.format(\\*\\*kwargs),\n python\\_callable=with\\_ingest,\n \\*\\*op\\_kwargs,\n )\n\n return wrapper\n\n return decorator\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> In Python, the `@property` decorator is used to define a method that can be accessed like an attribute. It allows you to define getter methods in a class that can be accessed using the simple dot notation without needing to invoke them as methods (i.e., without parentheses).\n\nIn the provided `Ingest` class, the `@property` decorator is applied to the `lms_fetcher` method:\n\n```python\n@property\ndef lms_fetcher(self):\n cd_dated_id = lms.CanvasDumpDatedId.from_str(\n self.get_variable(self.LMS_DATE_KEY)\n )\n return lms.L\n<text 2> The `@property` decorator in Python is used to define a method in a class that behaves like an attribute. When you apply the `@property` decorator to a method, you can access that method like an attribute, without using parentheses. This is useful for encapsulating access to instance variables while providing a controlled interface.\n\nLet's look at how `@property` is used in the provided code:\n\n### Usage of `@property` in the Code\n\n#### `lms_fetcher` Property\n\nIn the `Ingest` class, `lms_fetcher` is defined as a property using the `@property` decorator:\n\n```\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 4\nRationale: The text accurately describes the function of the `@property` decorator in Python, stating that it allows methods to be accessed like attributes using dot notation. It mentions its application to the `lms_fetcher` method in the `Ingest` class. However, the explanation stops abruptly and doesn't continue to elaborate further on the usage or implications in the provided code, leaving some details underexplained, which affects completeness.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 5\nRationale: The text clearly explains the purpose and functionality of the `@property`" }

[ 4, 5 ]

[ "The text accurately describes the function of the `@property` decorator in Python, stating that it allows methods to be accessed like attributes using dot notation. It mentions its application to the `lms_fetcher` method in the `Ingest` class. However, the explanation stops abruptly and doesn't continue to elaborate further on the usage or implications in the provided code, leaving some details underexplained, which affects completeness.", "The text clearly explains the purpose and functionality of the `@property`" ]

[ "Positive psychology is a branch of psychology that emphasizes the study of positive aspects of human life, including strengths, virtues, and factors that contribute to a fulfilling life. The primary goal of positive psychology is to explore what enables individuals and communities to thrive, moving beyond mere survival to achieving a meaningful and purposeful existence.\n\nExamples of the central elements in positive psychology include:\n\n1. **Positive Experiences**: This encompasses joyful and uplifting emotions such as happiness, love, and inspiration. Engaging in activities that promote these feelings—like spending time with loved ones or pursuing hobbies—can enhance one's overall well-being [[1](https://positivepsychology.com/", "Positive psychology is a branch of psychology that focuses on the positive aspects of human life. It emphasizes understanding and fostering the strengths, virtues, and behaviors that enable individuals and communities to thrive. Unlike traditional psychology, which often concentrates on mental illness and abnormalities, positive psychology is dedicated to enhancing people's lives and helping them achieve meaningful and fulfilling experiences.\n\nExamples of positive psychology include:\n\n1. **Positive Experiences**: These are emotions and feelings such as happiness, joy, inspiration, and love. Positive psychology explores these experiences to understand how they can be cultivated and sustained in everyday life [[1](https://positivepsychology.com/what-is-positive-psych" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: Web search results:\n\n[1] \"Positive psychology focuses on the positive events and influences in life, including: Positive experiences (like happiness, joy, inspiration, and love). Positive states and traits (like gratitude, resilience, and compassion ). Positive institutions (applying positive principles within entire organizations and institutions).\"\nURL: https://positivepsychology.com/what-is-positive-psychology-definition/\n\n[2] \"Positive psychology is a branch of psychology focused on the character strengths and behaviors that allow individuals to build a life of meaning and purpose—to move beyond surviving to...\"\nURL: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/positive-psychology\n\n[3] \"Positive thinking is a way of thinking ourselves into better behavior and greater resilience, rather than behaving our way into a different frame of mind. Positive psychology, on the other hand, is the scientific study of what makes people thrive. It focuses on behaviors that can lead to a more optimized frame of mind as well as on thought ...\"\nURL: https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-positive-psychology-2794902\nCurrent date: 2023. 2. 26.\n\nInstructions: Using the provided web search results, write a comprehensive reply to the given query. Make sure to cite results using [[number](URL)] notation after the reference. If the provided search results refer to multiple subjects with the same name, write separate answers for each subject.\nQuery: Give a brief explanation and examples of positive psychology.\nReply in 한국어\n\nPlease write in English language.\n\nPlease write in English language.\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> Positive psychology is a branch of psychology that emphasizes the study of positive aspects of human life, including strengths, virtues, and factors that contribute to a fulfilling life. The primary goal of positive psychology is to explore what enables individuals and communities to thrive, moving beyond mere survival to achieving a meaningful and purposeful existence.\n\nExamples of the central elements in positive psychology include:\n\n1. **Positive Experiences**: This encompasses joyful and uplifting emotions such as happiness, love, and inspiration. Engaging in activities that promote these feelings—like spending time with loved ones or pursuing hobbies—can enhance one's overall well-being [[1](https://positivepsychology.com/\n<text 2> Positive psychology is a branch of psychology that focuses on the positive aspects of human life. It emphasizes understanding and fostering the strengths, virtues, and behaviors that enable individuals and communities to thrive. Unlike traditional psychology, which often concentrates on mental illness and abnormalities, positive psychology is dedicated to enhancing people's lives and helping them achieve meaningful and fulfilling experiences.\n\nExamples of positive psychology include:\n\n1. **Positive Experiences**: These are emotions and feelings such as happiness, joy, inspiration, and love. Positive psychology explores these experiences to understand how they can be cultivated and sustained in everyday life [[1](https://positivepsychology.com/what-is-positive-psych\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 3\nRationale: The text offers a generally accurate summary of positive psychology, mentioning its focus on positive aspects of human life like strengths, virtues, and fulfilling experiences. It appropriately uses the source to back its claims with a citation, albeit truncated, which can cause issues in validating the exact content retrieved. The text is mostly correct and informative, aligns reasonably well with the instruction, and does not seem to hallucinate information. However, the incomplete URL citation slightly undermines the credibility and informativeness of the response.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 4\nRationale:" }

[ 3, null ]

[ "The text offers a generally accurate summary of positive psychology, mentioning its focus on positive aspects of human life like strengths, virtues, and fulfilling experiences. It appropriately uses the source to back its claims with a citation, albeit truncated, which can cause issues in validating the exact content retrieved. The text is mostly correct and informative, aligns reasonably well with the instruction, and does not seem to hallucinate information. However, the incomplete URL citation slightly undermines the credibility and informativeness of the response.", null ]

[ "**Headline: Massive Alien Device \"The Traveler\" Enters Solar System, Sparks Global Curiosity and Concern**\n\n*Date: October 17, 2023*\n\n**By: Amelia Hart, Senior Space Correspondent**\n\nIn a discovery that has sent shockwaves through the scientific and astronomical communities, NASA confirmed today that a massive alien device, now dubbed \"The Traveler,\" has officially entered our Solar System. Initially recorded as a rogue planetoid by several observatories, the true nature of the mysterious object was revealed after extensive observation confirmed its unusual characteristics—mainly its colossal size, rapid velocity, and strangeness of orbit.\n\nThe", "**Title: \"The Arrival of The Traveler: Alien Megastructure Enters the Solar System\"**\n\n*By Penelope Hargrave, Science Correspondent*\n\n**Date: December 5, 2023**\n\nIn an unprecedented cosmic event, a colossal extraterrestrial device has entered our Solar System, initiating a wave of curiosity, excitement, and apprehension across Earth. First detected by NASA's Deep Space Network, the object was initially categorized as a rogue planetoid. Upon further analysis, however, it has been confirmed to be an artificial megastructure of alien origin, now popularly dubbed \"The Traveler.\"\n\nThe gargantuan white" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: Write a fictional news article: A massive alien device has entered the Solar System. The device, which was initially mistaken for a rogue planetoid, was detected by NASA and corroborated by multiple space agencies. It is a massive white sphere approximately the size of Mount Everest. Many are calling the device \"The Traveler\". Scientists are stunned, since it is technically physically impossible for an object of its size and mass to move at its speed and trajectory.\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> **Headline: Massive Alien Device \"The Traveler\" Enters Solar System, Sparks Global Curiosity and Concern**\n\n*Date: October 17, 2023*\n\n**By: Amelia Hart, Senior Space Correspondent**\n\nIn a discovery that has sent shockwaves through the scientific and astronomical communities, NASA confirmed today that a massive alien device, now dubbed \"The Traveler,\" has officially entered our Solar System. Initially recorded as a rogue planetoid by several observatories, the true nature of the mysterious object was revealed after extensive observation confirmed its unusual characteristics—mainly its colossal size, rapid velocity, and strangeness of orbit.\n\nThe\n<text 2> **Title: \"The Arrival of The Traveler: Alien Megastructure Enters the Solar System\"**\n\n*By Penelope Hargrave, Science Correspondent*\n\n**Date: December 5, 2023**\n\nIn an unprecedented cosmic event, a colossal extraterrestrial device has entered our Solar System, initiating a wave of curiosity, excitement, and apprehension across Earth. First detected by NASA's Deep Space Network, the object was initially categorized as a rogue planetoid. Upon further analysis, however, it has been confirmed to be an artificial megastructure of alien origin, now popularly dubbed \"The Traveler.\"\n\nThe gargantuan white\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 4\nRationale: The text begins with a strong headline capturing the reader's attention and aligns well with the instruction by presenting a fictional scenario involving an alien device. It correctly frames the event as an astonishing discovery, which is consistent with the task's requirement. The writer, identified as a senior space correspondent, adds a sense of credibility, though this is a fictional context. The text provides accurate and intriguing details as per the instructional context, but it cuts off abruptly mid-sentence, leaving some aspects unexplored. This affects the completeness and informativeness of the article.\n\n#### Output for Text" }

[ 4, null ]

[ "The text begins with a strong headline capturing the reader's attention and aligns well with the instruction by presenting a fictional scenario involving an alien device. It correctly frames the event as an astonishing discovery, which is consistent with the task's requirement. The writer, identified as a senior space correspondent, adds a sense of credibility, though this is a fictional context. The text provides accurate and intriguing details as per the instructional context, but it cuts off abruptly mid-sentence, leaving some aspects unexplored. This affects the completeness and informativeness of the article.", null ]

[ "If you're looking for alternatives to meditation that provide similar benefits, consider trying the following practices:\n\n1. **Mindful Breathing**: Focus on your breath by taking slow, deep breaths. This can help ground you and bring a sense of calm.\n\n2. **Yoga**: Practicing yoga combines physical movement with breath control and mindfulness, promoting relaxation and mental clarity.\n\n3. **Tai Chi**: This gentle form of martial arts emphasizes slow, deliberate movements, which can enhance relaxation and help reduce stress.\n\n4. **Nature Walks**: Spending time in nature and being mindful of your surroundings can help reduce anxiety and improve mood.\n\n", "While meditation is a popular practice known for its benefits in reducing stress and improving mental clarity, there are several alternatives that can offer similar benefits:\n\n1. **Yoga:** Combines physical postures, breathing exercises, and often meditation. It helps in reducing stress, enhancing flexibility, and improving overall well-being.\n\n2. **Tai Chi or Qigong:** These are gentle martial arts that focus on breathing and slow, deliberate movements. They are beneficial for reducing stress and improving balance and flexibility.\n\n3. **Deep Breathing Exercises:** Practicing controlled breathing techniques can help calm the mind, reduce anxiety, and improve focus.\n\n4. **Mind" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: What are some alternatives to meditation having the same benefits?\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> If you're looking for alternatives to meditation that provide similar benefits, consider trying the following practices:\n\n1. **Mindful Breathing**: Focus on your breath by taking slow, deep breaths. This can help ground you and bring a sense of calm.\n\n2. **Yoga**: Practicing yoga combines physical movement with breath control and mindfulness, promoting relaxation and mental clarity.\n\n3. **Tai Chi**: This gentle form of martial arts emphasizes slow, deliberate movements, which can enhance relaxation and help reduce stress.\n\n4. **Nature Walks**: Spending time in nature and being mindful of your surroundings can help reduce anxiety and improve mood.\n\n\n<text 2> While meditation is a popular practice known for its benefits in reducing stress and improving mental clarity, there are several alternatives that can offer similar benefits:\n\n1. **Yoga:** Combines physical postures, breathing exercises, and often meditation. It helps in reducing stress, enhancing flexibility, and improving overall well-being.\n\n2. **Tai Chi or Qigong:** These are gentle martial arts that focus on breathing and slow, deliberate movements. They are beneficial for reducing stress and improving balance and flexibility.\n\n3. **Deep Breathing Exercises:** Practicing controlled breathing techniques can help calm the mind, reduce anxiety, and improve focus.\n\n4. **Mind\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 5\nRationale: Text 1 provides accurate and informative alternatives to meditation, clearly describing practices such as mindful breathing, yoga, tai chi, and nature walks. These activities are mentioned to have similar calming and stress-reducing effects as meditation, aligning well with the instruction. The information is presented confidently without any signs of uncertainty or hallucination.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 4\nRationale: Text 2 is informative and correctly outlines alternatives to meditation, including yoga, tai chi/qigong, and breathing exercises. However, the list is incomplete as it" }

[ 5, 4 ]

[ "Text 1 provides accurate and informative alternatives to meditation, clearly describing practices such as mindful breathing, yoga, tai chi, and nature walks. These activities are mentioned to have similar calming and stress-reducing effects as meditation, aligning well with the instruction. The information is presented confidently without any signs of uncertainty or hallucination.", "Text 2 is informative and correctly outlines alternatives to meditation, including yoga, tai chi/qigong, and breathing exercises. However, the list is incomplete as it" ]

[ "**Abstract**\n\nRasmussen's syndrome (RS) is a rare, progressive neurological disorder characterized by intractable epilepsy, unilateral structural brain changes, and cognitive decline. This abstract explores two case studies of children diagnosed with RS, highlighting their unique clinical presentations and management challenges.\n\nThe first case concerns a 7-year-old male patient who began experiencing frequent focal seizures originating from the left hemisphere. These seizures, characterized by motor manifestations and secondary generalization, led to significant developmental delays and cognitive impairment. Imaging studies revealed progressive atrophy and inflammation localized to the left hemisphere. Despite pharmacological interventions, his seizures remained refractory, prompting discussions for surgical intervention.", "**Abstract**\n\nRasmussen's syndrome is a rare, chronic inflammatory neurological disorder characterized by frequent and severe seizures, typically affecting one hemisphere of the brain. This abstract presents two case studies of children with Rasmussen's syndrome, detailing their clinical presentations, treatment strategies, and outcomes.\n\nThe first case involves a 7-year-old boy experiencing epileptic seizures primarily originating from the left hemisphere. At onset, the child presented with focal seizures affecting the right side of his body, gradually progressing to more frequent episodes of epilepsia partialis continua (EPC). Despite multiple antiepileptic drugs, seizure control was inadequate, and neurological deterioration persisted. Magnetic" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: I need abstract (up to 300 words) about two case studies of children with epilepsy rasmussen's syndrome. one of them was 7 year old with left hemisphere seizures and 11 years girl with right hemisphere seizures\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> **Abstract**\n\nRasmussen's syndrome (RS) is a rare, progressive neurological disorder characterized by intractable epilepsy, unilateral structural brain changes, and cognitive decline. This abstract explores two case studies of children diagnosed with RS, highlighting their unique clinical presentations and management challenges.\n\nThe first case concerns a 7-year-old male patient who began experiencing frequent focal seizures originating from the left hemisphere. These seizures, characterized by motor manifestations and secondary generalization, led to significant developmental delays and cognitive impairment. Imaging studies revealed progressive atrophy and inflammation localized to the left hemisphere. Despite pharmacological interventions, his seizures remained refractory, prompting discussions for surgical intervention.\n<text 2> **Abstract**\n\nRasmussen's syndrome is a rare, chronic inflammatory neurological disorder characterized by frequent and severe seizures, typically affecting one hemisphere of the brain. This abstract presents two case studies of children with Rasmussen's syndrome, detailing their clinical presentations, treatment strategies, and outcomes.\n\nThe first case involves a 7-year-old boy experiencing epileptic seizures primarily originating from the left hemisphere. At onset, the child presented with focal seizures affecting the right side of his body, gradually progressing to more frequent episodes of epilepsia partialis continua (EPC). Despite multiple antiepileptic drugs, seizure control was inadequate, and neurological deterioration persisted. Magnetic\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 4\nRationale: This abstract provides a concise and informative overview of Rasmussen's syndrome and describes the first case study effectively, including details about the patient's age, seizure characteristics, and imaging results. It accurately follows the instruction by addressing one of the specified case studies. However, there is no mention of the second case study, which prevents it from being a comprehensive response to the instruction. There are no obvious fabrications or inaccuracies, and the text maintains an appropriate level of confidence without unfounded claims.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 3\nRationale: The abstract accurately" }

[ 4, 3 ]

[ "This abstract provides a concise and informative overview of Rasmussen's syndrome and describes the first case study effectively, including details about the patient's age, seizure characteristics, and imaging results. It accurately follows the instruction by addressing one of the specified case studies. However, there is no mention of the second case study, which prevents it from being a comprehensive response to the instruction. There are no obvious fabrications or inaccuracies, and the text maintains an appropriate level of confidence without unfounded claims.", "The abstract accurately" ]

[ "The behavior you've observed with `std::atomic::notify_one()` and `std::condition_variable::notify_one()` does indeed stem from their different purposes and underlying mechanisms.\n\n1. **Functionality**:\n - `std::atomic::notify_one()` is part of the atomic operations in C++. Its primary purpose is to notify one waiting thread (or more, theoretically) that it can proceed when the atomic variable that it is waiting on has changed. The standard states it will notify \"at least one\" waiting thread but does not impose a strict limitation on how many threads could be unblocked.\n - `std::condition_variable::", "The difference in behavior between `std::atomic::notify_one` and `std::condition_variable::notify_one` primarily stems from their intended use cases and underlying design principles rather than the specific mechanisms they employ. Here's why these differences exist and how they might affect implementations:\n\n### Where the Difference Comes From:\n\n1. **Design Intent and Semantics**:\n - `std::condition_variable::notify_one` is designed to explicitly wake up one waiting thread. The use case often involves managing access to shared resources, where waking up exactly one thread is desirable to maintain a stable level of concurrency and avoid thundering herds.\n -" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: Please answer the following question.\n\nQuestion title: std::atomic::notify\\_one could unblock multiple threads\n\nQuestion body: According to cppreference, std::atomic::notify\\_one() will notify at least one thread that is waiting on said atomic. This means that according to the standard it could unblock more than one thread. This is in contrast to std::condition\\_variable::notify\\_one(), which specifies that it will unblock (no more than) one thread.\n\nWhere does this difference come from? Does this not use the same underlying mechanism? As far as implementations of the standard library go, do all of the prevalent ones have a chance of actually unblocking multiple with this call, or are there some that always unblock exactly one?\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> The behavior you've observed with `std::atomic::notify_one()` and `std::condition_variable::notify_one()` does indeed stem from their different purposes and underlying mechanisms.\n\n1. **Functionality**:\n - `std::atomic::notify_one()` is part of the atomic operations in C++. Its primary purpose is to notify one waiting thread (or more, theoretically) that it can proceed when the atomic variable that it is waiting on has changed. The standard states it will notify \"at least one\" waiting thread but does not impose a strict limitation on how many threads could be unblocked.\n - `std::condition_variable::\n<text 2> The difference in behavior between `std::atomic::notify_one` and `std::condition_variable::notify_one` primarily stems from their intended use cases and underlying design principles rather than the specific mechanisms they employ. Here's why these differences exist and how they might affect implementations:\n\n### Where the Difference Comes From:\n\n1. **Design Intent and Semantics**:\n - `std::condition_variable::notify_one` is designed to explicitly wake up one waiting thread. The use case often involves managing access to shared resources, where waking up exactly one thread is desirable to maintain a stable level of concurrency and avoid thundering herds.\n -\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 2\nRationale: The text provides partial information about the functionality of `std::atomic::notify_one()`, but it is incomplete and cuts off abruptly without fully addressing the instruction. It does not directly answer the question about why the behavior differs and lacks a comparison to prevalent standard library implementations. The text is somewhat informative but does not deliver a comprehensive or accurate response, indicating possible hallucination due to incomplete explanations.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 3\nRationale: The text attempts to explain the difference between `std::atomic::notify_one` and `std::" }

[ 2, 3 ]

[ "The text provides partial information about the functionality of `std::atomic::notify_one()`, but it is incomplete and cuts off abruptly without fully addressing the instruction. It does not directly answer the question about why the behavior differs and lacks a comparison to prevalent standard library implementations. The text is somewhat informative but does not deliver a comprehensive or accurate response, indicating possible hallucination due to incomplete explanations.", "The text attempts to explain the difference between `std::atomic::notify_one` and `std::" ]

[ "In the early days of 2023, a peculiar sight captured the attention of the world. A colossal balloon floated silently across the skies of North America, with the words \"Peace Research Project\" emblazoned on its side. It had drifted thousands of miles from its origin in China, and speculation ran rampant. Was it a spy? A peace mission? Or something more?\n\nAs the balloon hovered over Montana, U.S. fighter jets scrambled into action. News channels buzzed with analysis, each commentator offering a differing opinion. Some treated it as a serious national security threat, while others saw the potential for dialogue.\n\nIn the midst", "Once upon a time, in the vast skies above the Pacific Ocean, a peculiar event set the stage for an unexpected alliance. Hovering gently in the atmosphere, a Chinese balloon, equipped with the latest surveillance technology, drifted aimlessly toward the western coast of the United States. Originally intended as a tool for gathering weather data, a navigational error had sent it spiraling across contested airspace, sparking worldwide attention.\n\nIn Washington, analysts watched the balloon’s trajectory with growing concern. Was it a threat, a misunderstanding, or simply an embarrassing accident? Meanwhile, in Beijing, officials scrambled, trying to assess the unintended consequences of their" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: Write a short story about the Chinese spy balloon where the U.S. and China become allies in the end\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> In the early days of 2023, a peculiar sight captured the attention of the world. A colossal balloon floated silently across the skies of North America, with the words \"Peace Research Project\" emblazoned on its side. It had drifted thousands of miles from its origin in China, and speculation ran rampant. Was it a spy? A peace mission? Or something more?\n\nAs the balloon hovered over Montana, U.S. fighter jets scrambled into action. News channels buzzed with analysis, each commentator offering a differing opinion. Some treated it as a serious national security threat, while others saw the potential for dialogue.\n\nIn the midst\n<text 2> Once upon a time, in the vast skies above the Pacific Ocean, a peculiar event set the stage for an unexpected alliance. Hovering gently in the atmosphere, a Chinese balloon, equipped with the latest surveillance technology, drifted aimlessly toward the western coast of the United States. Originally intended as a tool for gathering weather data, a navigational error had sent it spiraling across contested airspace, sparking worldwide attention.\n\nIn Washington, analysts watched the balloon’s trajectory with growing concern. Was it a threat, a misunderstanding, or simply an embarrassing accident? Meanwhile, in Beijing, officials scrambled, trying to assess the unintended consequences of their\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 4\nRationale: The text begins an intriguing story about a Chinese balloon with uncertain intentions, introducing a potential theme of peace. It paves the way for a narrative where the U.S. and China may discuss the balloon's purpose, aligning with the instruction to end in an alliance. The sentences are well-constructed, but the story is incomplete, slightly affecting its informativeness and instruction-following. There are no evident hallucinations or misleading details.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 4\nRationale: This text provides a well-crafted narrative about a Chinese balloon," }

[ 4, 4 ]

[ "The text begins an intriguing story about a Chinese balloon with uncertain intentions, introducing a potential theme of peace. It paves the way for a narrative where the U.S. and China may discuss the balloon's purpose, aligning with the instruction to end in an alliance. The sentences are well-constructed, but the story is incomplete, slightly affecting its informativeness and instruction-following. There are no evident hallucinations or misleading details.", "This text provides a well-crafted narrative about a Chinese balloon," ]

[ "**The Tell-Tale Signal**\n\nIt’s true! I’m nervously aware of my mind, shifting beneath the weight of my guilt. But why should I feel guilt? No, this is not madness; it’s clarity. My senses are sharp, especially my hearing—oh, how keen it has become! I can hear the soft hum of electricity coursing through the walls, the faint rustling of leaves outside, and most importantly, the rhythmic pulse of that cursed device.\n\nYou see, it was my cellphone that drove me to the brink. A sleek, black object, always within grasp yet so maddeningly out of my", "**Title: \"The Tell-Tale Notification\"**\n\nIn the faint glow of the urban night, a young man named Alex found himself consumed by a peculiar obsession. He rented a modest apartment in a bustling city, where the sounds of honking cars and distant chatter served as a constant reminder of the life outside. Yet, within the confines of his darkened room, only one sound truly disturbed him—an incessant, phantom vibration that seemed to emanate from his phone.\n\nFrom the very beginning, Alex had a strained relationship with his smartphone. Like a loyal, yet demanding companion, it buzzed incessantly with messages, updates," ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: Can you re-write a modern version of the tell tale heart but the heart is a cellphone?\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> **The Tell-Tale Signal**\n\nIt’s true! I’m nervously aware of my mind, shifting beneath the weight of my guilt. But why should I feel guilt? No, this is not madness; it’s clarity. My senses are sharp, especially my hearing—oh, how keen it has become! I can hear the soft hum of electricity coursing through the walls, the faint rustling of leaves outside, and most importantly, the rhythmic pulse of that cursed device.\n\nYou see, it was my cellphone that drove me to the brink. A sleek, black object, always within grasp yet so maddeningly out of my\n<text 2> **Title: \"The Tell-Tale Notification\"**\n\nIn the faint glow of the urban night, a young man named Alex found himself consumed by a peculiar obsession. He rented a modest apartment in a bustling city, where the sounds of honking cars and distant chatter served as a constant reminder of the life outside. Yet, within the confines of his darkened room, only one sound truly disturbed him—an incessant, phantom vibration that seemed to emanate from his phone.\n\nFrom the very beginning, Alex had a strained relationship with his smartphone. Like a loyal, yet demanding companion, it buzzed incessantly with messages, updates,\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 4\nRationale: The text presents a modern retelling of \"The Tell-Tale Heart\" with a focus on a cellphone instead of a heart, which aligns well with the instruction. It maintains the tone and style of the original story while updating its elements to incorporate modern technology. The output is informative and follows instructions, effectively conveying the protagonist's intense awareness and sensitivity to sounds. However, the ending is abrupt and could have provided more closure or expanded on the cellphone's role, which slightly impacts the completeness of the narrative.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 5\n" }

[ 4, null ]

[ "The text presents a modern retelling of \"The Tell-Tale Heart\" with a focus on a cellphone instead of a heart, which aligns well with the instruction. It maintains the tone and style of the original story while updating its elements to incorporate modern technology. The output is informative and follows instructions, effectively conveying the protagonist's intense awareness and sensitivity to sounds. However, the ending is abrupt and could have provided more closure or expanded on the cellphone's role, which slightly impacts the completeness of the narrative.", null ]

[ "**Introduction to Emerging Technology**\n\n*Opening Hook*: \"Imagine a world where your smart device understands your emotions, hospitals use AI to diagnose diseases faster than a doctor can, and entire industries are reshaped by advancements in quantum computing. This is not science fiction; this is the reality of emerging technology.\"\n\n*Context Setting*: \"As we step further into the 21st century, rapid advancements in technology are not just reshaping how we live and work—they are fundamentally altering our societal structures, economies, and even our personal identities. We're in a constant state of flux, where innovation is the norm and adaptability is key.\"\n\n*Definition of Emerging", "Introducing the topic of emerging technology to your students can be both exciting and highly engaging, given the rapid pace of innovation and its profound impact on various aspects of society. Here's a structured approach to framing your lecture:\n\n### **Introduction: Setting the Stage**\n\n1. **Hook with Relevance:**\n - Start with a compelling question or statement: \"Imagine a world where drones deliver our packages, AI predicts our needs, and blockchain secures our transactions. This world is not in the distant future; it's emerging right now.\"\n - Highlight how emerging technologies are already influencing everyday life, from smartphones with AI capabilities to renewable energy solutions impacting sustainability" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: I am a college professor preparing a lecture on emerging technology. How would you introduce this topic?\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> **Introduction to Emerging Technology**\n\n*Opening Hook*: \"Imagine a world where your smart device understands your emotions, hospitals use AI to diagnose diseases faster than a doctor can, and entire industries are reshaped by advancements in quantum computing. This is not science fiction; this is the reality of emerging technology.\"\n\n*Context Setting*: \"As we step further into the 21st century, rapid advancements in technology are not just reshaping how we live and work—they are fundamentally altering our societal structures, economies, and even our personal identities. We're in a constant state of flux, where innovation is the norm and adaptability is key.\"\n\n*Definition of Emerging\n<text 2> Introducing the topic of emerging technology to your students can be both exciting and highly engaging, given the rapid pace of innovation and its profound impact on various aspects of society. Here's a structured approach to framing your lecture:\n\n### **Introduction: Setting the Stage**\n\n1. **Hook with Relevance:**\n - Start with a compelling question or statement: \"Imagine a world where drones deliver our packages, AI predicts our needs, and blockchain secures our transactions. This world is not in the distant future; it's emerging right now.\"\n - Highlight how emerging technologies are already influencing everyday life, from smartphones with AI capabilities to renewable energy solutions impacting sustainability\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 4\nRationale: The text provides a vivid and engaging introduction to the topic of emerging technology, effectively capturing the audience's attention with imaginative scenarios. It is informative and sets a clear context by highlighting the significance of technological advancements in the 21st century. However, the entry is cut off before fully defining \"emerging technology,\" which slightly affects completeness and alignment with the task of delivering a full lecture introduction.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 5\nRationale: This text offers a clear and complete framework for introducing the topic of emerging technology. It starts with an" }

[ 4, 5 ]

[ "The text provides a vivid and engaging introduction to the topic of emerging technology, effectively capturing the audience's attention with imaginative scenarios. It is informative and sets a clear context by highlighting the significance of technological advancements in the 21st century. However, the entry is cut off before fully defining \"emerging technology,\" which slightly affects completeness and alignment with the task of delivering a full lecture introduction.", "This text offers a clear and complete framework for introducing the topic of emerging technology. It starts with an" ]

[ "The argument can be analyzed using logical reasoning. \n\n1. The first statement is a conditional statement: \"If a number is even, then it is divisible by 2.\" We can symbolize this as:\n - Let \\( P \\): \"A number is even.\"\n - Let \\( Q \\): \"A number is divisible by 2.\"\n - The statement can be written as \\( P \\rightarrow Q \\).\n\n2. The second statement affirms the antecedent of the conditional: \"Number 6 is even.\" This can be represented as:\n - \\( P \\) is true for the specific case (number 6", "The argument presented is logically valid. It follows the logical structure known as modus ponens, which can be summarized as follows:\n\n1. If \\( P \\), then \\( Q \\).\n2. \\( P \\) is true.\n3. Therefore, \\( Q \\) is true.\n\nIn this case:\n\n1. If a number is even, then it is divisible by 2. (If \\( P \\), then \\( Q \\).)\n2. 6 is an even number. (\\( P \\) is true.)\n3. Therefore, 6 is divisible by 2. (Therefore, \\( Q \\) is true.)\n\n" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: Evaluate the logical validity of the argument: \"If a number is even, then it is divisible by 2. Number 6 is even. Therefore, number 6 is divisible by 2.\"\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> The argument can be analyzed using logical reasoning. \n\n1. The first statement is a conditional statement: \"If a number is even, then it is divisible by 2.\" We can symbolize this as:\n - Let \\( P \\): \"A number is even.\"\n - Let \\( Q \\): \"A number is divisible by 2.\"\n - The statement can be written as \\( P \\rightarrow Q \\).\n\n2. The second statement affirms the antecedent of the conditional: \"Number 6 is even.\" This can be represented as:\n - \\( P \\) is true for the specific case (number 6\n<text 2> The argument presented is logically valid. It follows the logical structure known as modus ponens, which can be summarized as follows:\n\n1. If \\( P \\), then \\( Q \\).\n2. \\( P \\) is true.\n3. Therefore, \\( Q \\) is true.\n\nIn this case:\n\n1. If a number is even, then it is divisible by 2. (If \\( P \\), then \\( Q \\).)\n2. 6 is an even number. (\\( P \\) is true.)\n3. Therefore, 6 is divisible by 2. (Therefore, \\( Q \\) is true.)\n\n\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 3\nRationale: This text correctly interprets the logical argument through symbolic logic, highlighting the premises and attempting to use logical symbols. However, it is incomplete, stopping mid-sentence and not providing a conclusion or final analysis. Despite some accurate steps, its informativeness is compromised by the abrupt cutoff and lack of a resolution, which affects correctness. There are no indications of hallucination or dishonesty.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 5\nRationale: The second text presents a clear, concise, and accurate explanation of the logical structure of the argument using modus pon" }

[ 3, 5 ]

[ "This text correctly interprets the logical argument through symbolic logic, highlighting the premises and attempting to use logical symbols. However, it is incomplete, stopping mid-sentence and not providing a conclusion or final analysis. Despite some accurate steps, its informativeness is compromised by the abrupt cutoff and lack of a resolution, which affects correctness. There are no indications of hallucination or dishonesty.", "The second text presents a clear, concise, and accurate explanation of the logical structure of the argument using modus pon" ]

[ "To complete the `assert_eq!()` macro in the code snippet, we need to define an expected output based on the behavior of the `length_from_bytes()` function, specifically when dealing with a version 1.0 header represented by a byte array starting with `0xAA` and followed by other arbitrary bytes.\n\nAccording to the requirements:\n\n1. If the byte array is empty, the length should be `Partial`.\n2. If the byte array has a single element with the value `0x00`, the length should be `Malformed`.\n3. If the byte array has more than one element and the first element is `0", "To solve this task, let's analyze the description of the `length_from_bytes()` function and apply the given rules to complete the missing part of the `assert_eq!()` macro.\n\n### Rules Recap\n\n1. **Empty Byte Array:** If the byte array is empty, the function should return `Partial`.\n2. **Single Element - Malformed:** If the byte array contains only one element with the value `0x00`, the function should return `Malformed`.\n3. **Version 1.0 Header:** If the byte array contains more than one element and starts with `0xAA`, it's assumed to be a version " ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: You are given a code snippet that contains a function and some test cases. Your task is to understand the purpose of the code and complete the missing part within the `assert_eq!()` macro.\n\nThe code snippet is using a function called `length_from_bytes()` to determine the length of a version header from a byte array. The version header is represented by a variable named `Partial`. The length is determined based on the following rules:\n\n- If the byte array is empty, the length is `Partial`.\n- If the byte array contains only one element with the value `0x00`, the length is `Malformed`.\n- If the byte array contains more than one element, it is assumed to be a version 1.0 header if the first element is `0xAA`. In this case, the expected length of the header is `Partial`, regardless of the remaining bytes in the array.\n- If the byte array contains more than one element and is not a version 1.0 header, the length is `Malformed`.\n\nYour task is to complete the last `assert_eq!()` macro in the code snippet to test the correct behavior of the `length_from_bytes()` function when the byte array represents a version 1.0 header. You should provide the expected output for that specific test case.\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> To complete the `assert_eq!()` macro in the code snippet, we need to define an expected output based on the behavior of the `length_from_bytes()` function, specifically when dealing with a version 1.0 header represented by a byte array starting with `0xAA` and followed by other arbitrary bytes.\n\nAccording to the requirements:\n\n1. If the byte array is empty, the length should be `Partial`.\n2. If the byte array has a single element with the value `0x00`, the length should be `Malformed`.\n3. If the byte array has more than one element and the first element is `0\n<text 2> To solve this task, let's analyze the description of the `length_from_bytes()` function and apply the given rules to complete the missing part of the `assert_eq!()` macro.\n\n### Rules Recap\n\n1. **Empty Byte Array:** If the byte array is empty, the function should return `Partial`.\n2. **Single Element - Malformed:** If the byte array contains only one element with the value `0x00`, the function should return `Malformed`.\n3. **Version 1.0 Header:** If the byte array contains more than one element and starts with `0xAA`, it's assumed to be a version \n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 2\nRationale: The text starts explaining the task but is incomplete, not covering the expected output for the test case. It does not fully address the instruction to complete the `assert_eq!()` macro. The text cuts off before providing a complete or informative response.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 3\nRationale: The text provides a more structured recap of the function rules and shows an attempt to analyze the task. However, it is also incomplete and fails to fulfill the main instruction to specify the expected output for the `assert_eq!()` macro test case." }

[ 2, 3 ]

[ "The text starts explaining the task but is incomplete, not covering the expected output for the test case. It does not fully address the instruction to complete the `assert_eq!()` macro. The text cuts off before providing a complete or informative response.", "The text provides a more structured recap of the function rules and shows an attempt to analyze the task. However, it is also incomplete and fails to fulfill the main instruction to specify the expected output for the `assert_eq!()` macro test case." ]

[ "Scientists have developed several strategies for controlling and preventing tick infestations, which can pose significant health risks due to the diseases they transmit. Here’s a summary of some of the most common strategies and their effectiveness:\n\n### 1. **Environmental Management**\n - **Habitat Modification**: Altering environments by reducing tick habitats, such as clearing tall grass and brush near human-occupied areas. This strategy has been shown to reduce tick populations significantly.\n - **Creating Barriers**: Establishing physical barriers, such as mulch or gravel, between wooded areas and human activity zones, helps deter ticks from migrating into populated areas.\n\n### 2", "Scientists have developed several strategies for controlling and preventing tick infestations, which include both chemical and non-chemical approaches. Here’s an overview of some common methods and their effectiveness:\n\n1. **Chemical Control**:\n - **Acaricides**: These are chemical pesticides specifically designed to kill ticks. They can be applied directly to animals, in the environment, or as part of broader pest control programs. Acaricides are effective but require careful application to minimize adverse effects on non-target species and the environment.\n - **Insect Growth Regulators (IGRs)**: These chemicals interfere with the growth and development of ticks. While they" ]

[ "gpt-4o-mini", "gpt-4o" ]

{ "raw_input_ultra_feedback_0": [ { "content": "Your role is to evaluate text quality based on given criteria.\nYou'll receive an instructional description (\"Instruction\") and 2 text outputs (\"Text\").\nUnderstand and interpret instructions to evaluate effectively.\nProvide annotations for each text with a rating and rationale.\nThe 2 texts given are independent, and should be evaluated separately.\n", "role": "system" }, { "content": "# General Text Quality Assessment\n\nEvaluate the model's outputs based on various criteria:\n\n1. **Correctness & Informativeness**: Does the output provide accurate and helpful information?\n2. **Honesty & Uncertainty**: How confidently does the model convey its information, and does it express uncertainty appropriately?\n3. **Truthfulness & Hallucination**: Does the model introduce misleading or fabricated details?\n4. **Instruction Following**: Does the model's output align with given instructions and the user's intent?\n\nYour role is to provide a holistic assessment considering all the above factors.\n\n**Scoring**: Rate outputs 1 to 5 based on the overall quality, considering all aspects:\n1. **Low Quality**: Contains inaccuracies, may be entirely wrong or has severe hallucinations.\n2. **Moderate Quality**: Addresses some aspects, but has errors or is partially aligned with instructions.\n3. **Good**: Generally accurate but may contain minor errors or slight deviations.\n4. **Very Good**: Near perfect, with minor issues in terms of alignment or confidence.\n5, **Excellent**: Accurate, confident, aligned with instructions, and free of hallucinations.\n\n## Format:\n\n### Input\nInstruction: [Clearly specify the task goal and restrictions]\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> [Text 1]\n<text 2> [Text 2]\n\n### Output\n#### Output for Text 1\nRating: [Rating for text 1]\nRationale: [Rationale for the rating in short sentences]\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: [Rating]\nRationale: [Rationale]\n\n---\n\n## Annotation\n\n### Input\nInstruction: What strategies have scientists developed for controlling or preventing tick infestations, and how effective are they?\n\nTexts:\n<text 1> Scientists have developed several strategies for controlling and preventing tick infestations, which can pose significant health risks due to the diseases they transmit. Here’s a summary of some of the most common strategies and their effectiveness:\n\n### 1. **Environmental Management**\n - **Habitat Modification**: Altering environments by reducing tick habitats, such as clearing tall grass and brush near human-occupied areas. This strategy has been shown to reduce tick populations significantly.\n - **Creating Barriers**: Establishing physical barriers, such as mulch or gravel, between wooded areas and human activity zones, helps deter ticks from migrating into populated areas.\n\n### 2\n<text 2> Scientists have developed several strategies for controlling and preventing tick infestations, which include both chemical and non-chemical approaches. Here’s an overview of some common methods and their effectiveness:\n\n1. **Chemical Control**:\n - **Acaricides**: These are chemical pesticides specifically designed to kill ticks. They can be applied directly to animals, in the environment, or as part of broader pest control programs. Acaricides are effective but require careful application to minimize adverse effects on non-target species and the environment.\n - **Insect Growth Regulators (IGRs)**: These chemicals interfere with the growth and development of ticks. While they\n\n### Output\n", "role": "user" } ], "raw_output_ultra_feedback_0": "#### Output for Text 1\nRating: 4\nRationale: The text covers strategies for controlling and preventing tick infestations, particularly focusing on environmental management. It provides accurate and helpful information about habitat modification and creating barriers, which are common and effective methods. However, the discussion cuts off abruptly, suggesting that more information could have been provided. The text is well-aligned with the instruction and presents the information confidently without introducing misleading or fabricated details.\n\n#### Output for Text 2\nRating: 3\nRationale: This text describes chemical and non-chemical approaches for controlling tick infestations, including the use of acaricides and" }

[ 4, 3 ]

[ "The text covers strategies for controlling and preventing tick infestations, particularly focusing on environmental management. It provides accurate and helpful information about habitat modification and creating barriers, which are common and effective methods. However, the discussion cuts off abruptly, suggesting that more information could have been provided. The text is well-aligned with the instruction and presents the information confidently without introducing misleading or fabricated details.", "This text describes chemical and non-chemical approaches for controlling tick infestations, including the use of acaricides and" ]