spelling

README.md

@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ To illustrate we can look at some example Iconclass classifications.
 
 [source](https://iconclass.org/41A12)
 
-The construction of Iconclass of parts makes it particulalry interesting (and challenging) to tackle via Machine Learning. Whilst one could tackle this dataset as a (multi) label image classification problem, this is only one way of tackling it. For example in the above label `castle` giving the model the 'freedom' to predict only a partial label could result in the prediction `41A` i.e. housing. Whilst a very particular form of housing this prediction is not 'wrong' so much as it is not as precise as a human cataloguer may provide. 
+The construction of Iconclass of parts makes it particularly interesting (and challenging) to tackle via Machine Learning. Whilst one could tackle this dataset as a (multi) label image classification problem, this is only one way of tackling it. For example in the above label `castle` giving the model the 'freedom' to predict only a partial label could result in the prediction `41A` i.e. housing. Whilst a very particular form of housing this prediction for 'castle' is not 'wrong' so much as it is not as precise as a human cataloguer may provide. 
 
 ### Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
 
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ The annotations are derived from the source dataset see above. It is likely that
 
 ### Discussion of Biases
 
-Iconclass as a metadata standard absorbs biases from the time and place of it's creation (1940's Netherlands). In particular, '32B human races, peoples; nationalities' has been subject to criticism. '32B36 'primitive', 'pre-modern' peoples' is one example of a category which we may not wish to adopt. In general there are components of the subdivsions of `32B` which reflect a belief that race is a scientific category rather than socialy constructed. 
+Iconclass as a metadata standard absorbs biases from the time and place of it's creation (1940's Netherlands). In particular, '32B human races, peoples; nationalities' has been subject to criticism. '32B36 'primitive', 'pre-modern' peoples' is one example of a category which we may not wish to adopt. In general there are components of the subdivsions of `32B` which reflect a belief that race is a scientific category rather than socially constructed. 
 
 These limitations are actively being explored by the Iconclass community, for example, see [Revising Iconclass section 32B human races, peoples; nationalities](https://web.archive.org/web/20210425131753/https://iconclass.org/Updating32B.pdf).