Datasets:
Draft README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,138 @@
|
|
1 |
-
---
|
2 |
-
|
3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
---
|
2 |
+
language: it
|
3 |
+
license: cc-by-sa-4.0
|
4 |
+
multilinguality: monolingual
|
5 |
+
task_categories:
|
6 |
+
- token-classification
|
7 |
+
|
8 |
+
tags:
|
9 |
+
- Factuality Detection
|
10 |
+
- Modality Detection
|
11 |
+
---
|
12 |
+
# ModaFact - Dataset
|
13 |
+
|
14 |
+
## Dataset Description
|
15 |
+
|
16 |
+
### Dataset Summary
|
17 |
+
|
18 |
+
ModaFact is a textual dataset annotated with Event Factuality and Modality in Italian. ModaFact’s goal is to model in a joint way factuality and modality values of event-denoting expressions in text.
|
19 |
+
|
20 |
+
### Textual data source
|
21 |
+
|
22 |
+
Original texts (sentences) have been sampled from EventNet-ITA, a dataset for Frame Parsing, which was created using texts from Wikipedia.
|
23 |
+
|
24 |
+
### Annotation
|
25 |
+
|
26 |
+
ModaFact has been originally annotated at token level, adopting the IOB2 style.
|
27 |
+
Whereas for Modality the schema is unique, for Factuality we provide two representations: a fine-grained representation (FG), which specifies values over three axes (CERTAINTY, POLARITY, TIME), and a coarse-grained representation (CG), which only provides the final factuality value.
|
28 |
+
|
29 |
+
|
30 |
+
Example of **coarse-grained representation (CG)**:
|
31 |
+
```
|
32 |
+
Per O
|
33 |
+
chiarire B-POSSIBLE-POS-FUTURE-FINAL
|
34 |
+
la O
|
35 |
+
questione O
|
36 |
+
la O
|
37 |
+
Santa O
|
38 |
+
Sede O
|
39 |
+
autorizzò B-CERTAIN-POS-PRESENT/PAST
|
40 |
+
il O
|
41 |
+
prelievo B-UNDERSPECIFIED-POS-FUTURE-CONCESSIVE
|
42 |
+
di O
|
43 |
+
campioni O
|
44 |
+
del O
|
45 |
+
legno O
|
46 |
+
che O
|
47 |
+
vennero O
|
48 |
+
datati B-CERTAIN-POS-PRESENT/PAST
|
49 |
+
attraverso O
|
50 |
+
l' O
|
51 |
+
utilizzo B-CERTAIN-POS-PRESENT/PAST
|
52 |
+
del O
|
53 |
+
metodo O
|
54 |
+
del O
|
55 |
+
carbonio-14 O
|
56 |
+
. O
|
57 |
+
```
|
58 |
+
|
59 |
+
Example of **fine-grained representation (CG)**:
|
60 |
+
```
|
61 |
+
Per O
|
62 |
+
chiarire B-NON_FACTUAL-FINAL
|
63 |
+
la O
|
64 |
+
questione O
|
65 |
+
la O
|
66 |
+
Santa O
|
67 |
+
Sede O
|
68 |
+
autorizzò B-FACTUAL
|
69 |
+
il O
|
70 |
+
prelievo B-NON_FACTUAL-CONCESSIVE
|
71 |
+
di O
|
72 |
+
campioni O
|
73 |
+
del O
|
74 |
+
legno O
|
75 |
+
che O
|
76 |
+
vennero O
|
77 |
+
datati B-FACTUAL
|
78 |
+
attraverso O
|
79 |
+
l' O
|
80 |
+
utilizzo B-FACTUAL
|
81 |
+
del O
|
82 |
+
metodo O
|
83 |
+
del O
|
84 |
+
carbonio-14 O
|
85 |
+
. O
|
86 |
+
```
|
87 |
+
|
88 |
+
#### Labelset
|
89 |
+
|
90 |
+
Factuality:
|
91 |
+
|
92 |
+
- Fine-grained
|
93 |
+
- CERTAINTY: {CERTAIN, PROBABLE, POSSIBLE, UNDERSPECIFIED}
|
94 |
+
- POLARITY: {POSITIVE, NEGATIVE, UNDERSPECIFIED}
|
95 |
+
- TIME: {PRESENT/PAST, FUTURE, UNDERSPECIFIED}
|
96 |
+
|
97 |
+
- Coarse-grained
|
98 |
+
- {FACTUAL, NON-FACTUAL, COUNTERFACTUAL, UNDERSPECIFIED}
|
99 |
+
|
100 |
+
|
101 |
+
Modality:
|
102 |
+
- {WILL, FINAL, CONCESSIVE, POSSIBILITY, CAPABILITY, DUTY, COERCION, EXHORTATIVE, COMMITMENT, DECISION}
|
103 |
+
|
104 |
+
|
105 |
+
### Data format
|
106 |
+
|
107 |
+
According to the experimental set presented in the paper (see below, Citation Information) we provide different data formats:
|
108 |
+
- **token-level BIO sequence labelling**: the dataset is formatted as a two-column `tsv`. The first column contains the token, the second column contains all corresponding labels (factuality and modality), concatenated with `-`. This format makes the dataset ready-to-train with the MaChAmp [seq_bio](https://github.com/machamp-nlp/machamp/blob/master/docs/seq_bio.md) task type.
|
109 |
+
- **token-level multi-task sequence labelling**: the dataset is formatted as a three-column `tsv`. The first column contains the token, the second column contains all factuality labels, the third column contains the modality label. This format makes the dataset ready-to-train with the Machamp seq_bio **multitask** setting.
|
110 |
+
- **generative and sequence-to-sequence**: the dataset is formatted as a `jsonl` file, containing a list of dictionaries. Each dictionary has an *Input* field (the sentence) and an *Output* field, a string composed by *token=labels* pairs. This format makes the dataset ready-to train with sequence-to-sequence and causal/generative models.
|
111 |
+
|
112 |
+
### Data Split
|
113 |
+
|
114 |
+
For the sake of reproducibility, we provide, for each configuration, the 5 folds used in the paper.
|
115 |
+
The data split follows a 60/20/20 ratio and has been created in a stratified way. This means each train/dev/test set contains (approx) the same relative distribution of classes.
|
116 |
+
|
117 |
+
|
118 |
+
|
119 |
+
## Additional Information
|
120 |
+
|
121 |
+
|
122 |
+
### Licensing Information
|
123 |
+
|
124 |
+
ModaFact is released under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 License.
|
125 |
+
|
126 |
+
### Citation Information
|
127 |
+
|
128 |
+
If you use ModaFact, please cite the following paper:
|
129 |
+
|
130 |
+
```
|
131 |
+
@inproceedings{rovera-et-al-2025-modafact,
|
132 |
+
title = "ModaFact: Multi-paradigm Evaluation for Joint Event Modality and Factuality Detection",
|
133 |
+
author = "Rovera, Marco and Cristoforetti, Serena and Tonelli, Sara",
|
134 |
+
booktitle = "COLING2025, tbp",
|
135 |
+
year = "2025",
|
136 |
+
|
137 |
+
}
|
138 |
+
```
|