| "{\"id\": \"4817288\", \"name\": \"FRANCES CLEO DIAZ, Appellant, v. VALU-MART, INC., Respondent\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Diaz v. Valu-Mart, Inc.\", \"decision_date\": \"1972-10-11\", \"docket_number\": \"No. 6818\", \"first_page\": 546, \"last_page\": 546, \"citations\": \"88 Nev. 546\", \"volume\": \"88\", \"reporter\": \"Nevada Reports\", \"court\": \"Supreme Court of Nevada\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Nevada\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-11T00:54:38.223031+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"FRANCES CLEO DIAZ, Appellant, v. VALU-MART, INC., Respondent.\", \"head_matter\": \"FRANCES CLEO DIAZ, Appellant, v. VALU-MART, INC., Respondent.\\nNo. 6818\\nOctober 11, 1972\\n501 P.2d 650\\nA. D. Demetras, of Reno, for Appellant.\\nErickson & Thorpe, of Reno, for Respondent.\", \"word_count\": \"59\", \"char_count\": \"376\", \"text\": \"OPINION\\nPer Curiam:\\nThe record on appeal fails to disclose that the district court abused its discretion in setting aside the default judgment entered in this action. Accordingly, we affirm.\"}" |