| "{\"id\": \"7340512\", \"name\": \"In the Matter of the ADOPTION OF R.A.M., a minor Indian Child of Fort Peck Tribes\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"In re the Adoption of R.A.M.\", \"decision_date\": \"2011-10-04\", \"docket_number\": \"No. 578\", \"first_page\": 283, \"last_page\": 284, \"citations\": \"11 Am. Tribal Law 283\", \"volume\": \"11\", \"reporter\": \"West's American Tribal Law Reporter\", \"court\": \"Fort Peck Court of Appeals\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Tribal Jurisdictions\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T19:05:47.253425+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"In the Matter of the ADOPTION OF R.A.M., a minor Indian Child of Fort Peck Tribes.\", \"head_matter\": \"In the Matter of the ADOPTION OF R.A.M., a minor Indian Child of Fort Peck Tribes.\\nNo. 578.\\nFort Peck Court of Appeals.\\nOct. 4, 2011.\", \"word_count\": \"224\", \"char_count\": \"1313\", \"text\": \"ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REVIEW\\nThis matter comes before the Court of Appeals on a Petition for Review brought by Riquelmer Aydin Martinez, Appellant, appearing pro se. The Appellant appealed an Order dated June 23, 2011, denying Appellant's request to vacate a June 17, 2009 Order of Adoption issued by the Court, Honorable Danna Runsabove presiding.\\nUpon review of the Court file, the Orders and Pleadings herein, this Court makes the following findings and Order:\\n1. The Trial Judge, in her Order affirming the original June 17, 2009 Order of Adoption, found no merit in the Appellant's Expediated Petition to set aside Order of Adoption.\\nThis Court will not set aside factual determinations of the Tribal Court if such determinations are supported by substantial evidence. Title II CCOJ Section 202.\\n2. The Court of Appeals shall review de novo all determinations of the Tribal Court on matters of law. Title II CCOJ Section 202. We find no error of law in the Court's Order.\\nBASED UPON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING:\\nIT IS NOW, THEREFORE, THE ORDER OF THIS COURT THAT:\\n1. The Petition for Review be denied.\\n2. The Court's judgment and order is affirmed.\"}" |