| "{\"id\": \"8338759\", \"name\": \"JOE ZIRK VS. STATE RAIL AUTHORITY\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Zirk v. State Rail Authority\", \"decision_date\": \"2003-10-30\", \"docket_number\": \"CC-03-419\", \"first_page\": \"56\", \"last_page\": \"56\", \"citations\": \"25 Ct. Cl. 56\", \"volume\": \"25\", \"reporter\": \"Report of the West Virginia Court of Claims\", \"court\": \"West Virginia Court of Claims\", \"jurisdiction\": \"West Virginia\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-11T00:49:36.680709+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"JOE ZIRK VS. STATE RAIL AUTHORITY\", \"head_matter\": \"OPINION ISSUED OCTOBER 30, 2003\\nJOE ZIRK VS. STATE RAIL AUTHORITY\\n(CC-03-419)\\nClaimant appeared pro se.\\nJohn S. Dalporto, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.\", \"word_count\": \"158\", \"char_count\": \"974\", \"text\": \"PER CURIAM:\\nThis claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.\\nClaimant seeks $1,765.00 forpersonal property damage caused when respondent was using a tamper on a railroad near claimant's home and a hydraulic hose burst on the machine and sprayed hydraulic fluid on claimant's property located in Moorefield, Hardy County.\\nIn its Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim and that the amount is fair and reasonable. The Court is aware that respondent does not have a fiscal method for paying claims of this nature; therefore, the claim has been submitted to this Court for determination.\\nIn view of the foregoing, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award to claimant in the amount of $1,765.00.\\nAward of $ 1,765.00.\"}" |