"{\"id\": \"10356800\", \"name\": \"Margaret Mary WOOD, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. Ernest Lee WOOD, Appellee (Defendant)\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Wood v. Wood\", \"decision_date\": \"1993-12-17\", \"docket_number\": \"No. 93-67\", \"first_page\": \"616\", \"last_page\": \"618\", \"citations\": \"865 P.2d 616\", \"volume\": \"865\", \"reporter\": \"Pacific Reporter 2d\", \"court\": \"Supreme Court of Wyoming\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Wyoming\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T18:13:42.524681+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"Before MACY, C.J., and THOMAS, CARDINE, GOLDEN and TAYLOR, JJ.\", \"parties\": \"Margaret Mary WOOD, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. Ernest Lee WOOD, Appellee (Defendant).\", \"head_matter\": \"Margaret Mary WOOD, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. Ernest Lee WOOD, Appellee (Defendant).\\nNo. 93-67.\\nSupreme Court of Wyoming.\\nDec. 17, 1993.\\nRehearing Denied Jan. 12, 1994.\\nPatrick M. Hunter, Casper, for appellant.\\nLawrence E. Middaugh, Casper, for appel-lee.\\nBefore MACY, C.J., and THOMAS, CARDINE, GOLDEN and TAYLOR, JJ.\", \"word_count\": \"738\", \"char_count\": \"4512\", \"text\": \"TAYLOR, Justice.\\nThis appeal, from an unreported hearing, follows a decision adverse to appellant in a dispute over allegedly delinquent child support payments. We dismiss because of the failure to settle the record on appeal as required by the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure.\\nAppellant, Margaret Mary Wood (Margaret), filed a petition on October 1, 1992 seeking to hold her former husband, appellee, Ernest Lee Wood (Ernest), in contempt of court for allegedly being delinquent in the payment of $7,400.00 for child support. The district court conducted a hearing and found that Margaret had failed to prove her allegations by a preponderance of the evidence. The hearing was unreported.\\nMargaret brought this appeal claiming error in the allocation of the burden of proof at the hearing. In an attempt to create a record on appeal, Margaret filed a \\\"Statement of Evidence and Proceedings\\\" under W.R.A.P. 3.03. The statement included an account of testimony at the hearing and documents, some of which had apparently been received into evidence. Ernest filed a number of proposed amendments to the statement of evidence.\\nThe record on appeal is fundamental to the exercise of appellate review because this court does not act as a fact finder. Gifford v. Casper Neon Sign Co., Inc., 618 P.2d 547, 551 (Wyo.1980). See W.R.A.P. 3.01 (defining contents of record on appeal). When a proceeding is reported and transcribed, the appellant may assert error in the findings or conclusions of the district court. W.R.A.P. 3.02. The Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure specify a means of providing a record on appeal to support claims of error when a proceeding is unreported:\\nIf no report of the evidence or proceedings at a hearing or trial was made, or if a transcript is unavailable, appellant may prepare a statement of the evidence or proceedings from the best available means including appellant's recollection. The statement shall be served on appellee, who may serve objections or propose amendments within 15 days after service. The statement and any objections or proposed amendments shall be submitted to the trial court for settlement and approval and as settled and approved shall be included by the clerk of the trial court in the record on appeal.\\nW.R.A.P. 3.03 (emphasis added).\\nAppellant bears the burden to bring a sufficient record to this court upon which a decision can be based. Scherling v. Kilgore, 599 P.2d 1352, 1357 (Wyo.1979). Appellant has failed in this instance to follow the dictates of our procedure. The statement of evidence and the proposed amendments offered by the parties were not settled and approved and included in the record on appeal. W.R.A.P. 3.03.\\nWithout a settled record of the proceedings at the hearing, we are unable to consider this appeal and order it dismissed. Korkow v. Markle, 746 P.2d 434, 435 (Wyo.1987); Sharp v. Sharp, 671 P.2d 317, 318 (Wyo.1983); Matter of Parental Rights of SCN, 659 P.2d 568, 572 (Wyo.1983).\\nDismissed.\"}" |