| "{\"id\": \"1272417\", \"name\": \"Coker v. City of Tifton\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Coker v. City of Tifton\", \"decision_date\": \"1911-11-07\", \"docket_number\": \"3641\", \"first_page\": \"66\", \"last_page\": \"66\", \"citations\": \"10 Ga. App. 66\", \"volume\": \"10\", \"reporter\": \"Georgia Appeals Reports\", \"court\": \"Court of Appeals of Georgia\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Georgia\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T23:13:54.542582+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"Coker v. City of Tifton.\", \"head_matter\": \"3641.\\nCoker v. City of Tifton.\\nDecided November 7, 1911.\\nCertiorari; from Tift superior court \\u2014 Judge Thomas.\\nJuly 22, 1911.\\nJ. B. Murrow, J. J. Murray,, for plaintiff in error.\\nFulwood & Murray, contra.\", \"word_count\": \"125\", \"char_count\": \"693\", \"text\": \"Hill, C. J.\\n1. Questions involving the validity of a municipal ordinance and the jurisdiction of the trial court, not made in that court, and raised for the first time on certiorari in the superior court, will not be considered by the latter court, or by this court. Sutton v. Washington, 4 Ga. App. 30 (60 S. E. 811) ; S., F. & W. Ry. Co. v. Hardin, 110 Ga. 433 (35 S. E. 681).\\n2. No error of law appears, and the verdict fully supports the finding of the trial court. Judgment affirmed.\"}" |