| "{\"id\": \"11328937\", \"name\": \"STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrell J. COBBLE, Appellant\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"State v. Cobble\", \"decision_date\": \"1988-08-09\", \"docket_number\": \"No. 54212\", \"first_page\": \"28\", \"last_page\": \"29\", \"citations\": \"755 S.W.2d 28\", \"volume\": \"755\", \"reporter\": \"South Western Reporter Second Series\", \"court\": \"Missouri Court of Appeals\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Missouri\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T20:37:57.953724+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrell J. COBBLE, Appellant.\", \"head_matter\": \"STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrell J. COBBLE, Appellant.\\nNo. 54212.\\nMissouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.\\nAug. 9, 1988.\\nDewey S. Godfrey, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.\\nJames Bick, Clayton, for respondent.\", \"word_count\": \"81\", \"char_count\": \"536\", \"text\": \"ORDER\\nPER CURIAM.\\nDefendant appeals from his conviction of driving while intoxicated. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).\\nThe parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose.\"}" |