"{\"id\": \"207314\", \"name\": \"TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN, IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT ET AL.. RESPONDENTS\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Township of North Bergen v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment\", \"decision_date\": \"1925-01-19\", \"docket_number\": \"\", \"first_page\": \"235\", \"last_page\": \"235\", \"citations\": \"101 N.J.L. 235\", \"volume\": \"101\", \"reporter\": \"New Jersey Law Reports\", \"court\": \"New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals\", \"jurisdiction\": \"New Jersey\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-11T00:51:46.120278+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN, IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT ET AL.. RESPONDENTS.\", \"head_matter\": \"TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN, IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT ET AL.. RESPONDENTS.\\nSubmitted November 7, 1924\\nDecided January 19, 1925.\\nEor the appellant, J. Emil Walscheid.\\nEor the respondents, Gaede & Gaede.\", \"word_count\": \"83\", \"char_count\": \"556\", \"text\": \"Per Curiam.\\nThe judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered bjr the Supreme Court.\\nFor affirmance \\u2014 The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Mimturn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, Clx\\u00ed.rk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.\\nFor reversal \\u2014 -None.\"}"