"{\"id\": \"1536919\", \"name\": \"Murray Reich, Administrator, vs. George Fatool\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Reich v. Fatool\", \"decision_date\": \"1929-06-13\", \"docket_number\": \"\", \"first_page\": \"734\", \"last_page\": \"735\", \"citations\": \"109 Conn. 734\", \"volume\": \"109\", \"reporter\": \"Connecticut Reports\", \"court\": \"Connecticut Supreme Court\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Connecticut\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T18:46:51.731736+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"Wheeler, C. J., Maltbie, Haines, Hinman and- Banks, Js.\", \"parties\": \"Murray Reich, Administrator, vs. George Fatool.\", \"head_matter\": \"Murray Reich, Administrator, vs. George Fatool.\\nThird Judicial District, Bridgeport,\\nApril Term, 1929.\\nWheeler, C. J., Maltbie, Haines, Hinman and- Banks, Js.\\nArgued April 17th\\ndecided June 13th, 1929.\\nPhilip Reich, with whom, on the brief, was Samuel Reich, for the appellant (plaintiff).\\nHenry C. Wilson, for the appellee (defendant).\", \"word_count\": \"114\", \"char_count\": \"720\", \"text\": \"Per Curiam.\\nAn examination and comparison of the evidence has satisfied us that the trial court was correct in its conclusion that there was no sufficient evidence before the jury from which the plaintiff's freedom from contributory negligence could have been found and that we cannot hold that the ruling setting aside the verdict was erroneous as matter of law.\\nThere is no error.\"}"