"{\"id\": \"427807\", \"name\": \"Laurel Produce Growers Association, a corporation created by and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, d. b. a., vs. Reese O. Gordy, p. b. r.\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Laurel Produce Growers Ass'n v. Gordy\", \"decision_date\": \"1924-02-11\", \"docket_number\": \"No. 57,\", \"first_page\": \"405\", \"last_page\": \"406\", \"citations\": \"32 Del. 405\", \"volume\": \"32\", \"reporter\": \"Delaware Reports\", \"court\": \"Delaware Superior Court\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Delaware\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T21:23:34.925620+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"\", \"parties\": \"Laurel Produce Growers Association, a corporation created by and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, d. b. a., vs. Reese O. Gordy, p. b. r.\", \"head_matter\": \"Laurel Produce Growers Association, a corporation created by and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, d. b. a., vs. Reese O. Gordy, p. b. r.\\n(February 11, 1924.)\\nHarrington and Richards, J. J., sitting.\\nJames M. Tumtell for plaintiff.\\nJohn M. Richardson for defendant.\\nSuperior Court for Sussex County,\\nFebruary Term, 1924.\\nNo. 57,\\nFebruary term, 1923.\", \"word_count\": \"132\", \"char_count\": \"763\", \"text\": \"Richards, J.\\nWe think that the book in question has been sufficiently identified as being the account book of the defendant in its transactions with the plaintiff. We, therefore, think that it is admissible against the defendant on the ground that it is an admission against interest. 2 Ency. of Ev., pp. 664, 666; Currier v. Boston & M. R. Co., 31 N. H. 209; Allen v. Coitt, 6 Hill. (N. Y.) 318.\"}"