"{\"id\": \"11258458\", \"name\": \"The People v. Mu\\u00f1iz\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"People v. Mu\\u00f1iz\", \"decision_date\": \"1905-12-09\", \"docket_number\": \"No. 79\", \"first_page\": \"471\", \"last_page\": \"472\", \"citations\": \"9 P.R. 471\", \"volume\": \"9\", \"reporter\": \"Puerto Rico Reports\", \"court\": \"Supreme Court of Puerto Rico\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Puerto Rico\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-11T00:11:48.987421+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"Chief Justice Qui\\u00f1ones, and Justices Hern\\u00e1ndez, Mac-Leary, and Wolf concurred.\", \"parties\": \"The People v. Mu\\u00f1iz.\", \"head_matter\": \"The People v. Mu\\u00f1iz.\\nAppeal from the District Court of' Arecibo.\\nNo. 79.\\nDecided December 9, 1905.\\nAppeal \\u2014 Bill oe Exceptions \\u2014 Statement oe Facts \\u2014 Manifest Errors. \\u2014 Where there is no bili of exceptions or statement of factjs and it does not appear from the record that any error has been committed which would justify a reversal of the judgment appealed from, the same should be affirmed.\\nThe facts are stated in the opinion.\\nMr. Bossy, fiscal, for respondent.\\nThe appellant did not appear.\", \"word_count\": \"338\", \"char_count\": \"2001\", \"text\": \"Me. Justice Figueras\\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\\nSpecial- Fiscal E. B. Wilcox filed an information, duly sworn to, against Bamon Muniz Martinez, charging that while acting as the judge of election of a precinct, assisted by one of the other judges, he maliciously and fraudulently struck off the list of electors thereof the name of Tomas Ortiz, who was an elector qualified in said precinct; thus depriving him of his right to vote.\\nOn April 27th of the current year the District Court of Arecibo found him guilty. On the following 6th of May the defendant appeared, and not showing cause sufficient why judgment should not be pronounced against him, he was the same day sentenced for a crime against the elective franchise to imprisonment in the departmental penitentiary of the Island, for one year, at hard labor, and to pay the costs.\\nFrom this judgment an appeal was taken to this Supreme Court, without any allegation being made of the commission of any error.\\nThe fiscal of this court asks that the judgment be affirmed.\\nNo bill of exceptions or statement of facts, or even a simple brief, has been presented.\\nUnder the circumstances nothing can be done, and as, 'on the other hand, it does not appear from the record that any fundamental error has been committed, we recommend that the judgment appealed from be affirmed, with the costs of the appeal against the appellant.\\nAffirmed.\\nChief Justice Qui\\u00f1ones, and Justices Hern\\u00e1ndez, Mac-Leary, and Wolf concurred.\\nSee Title XT, Penal Code.\"}"