Datasets:
Tasks:
Tabular Classification
Modalities:
Tabular
Formats:
csv
Sub-tasks:
tabular-multi-class-classification
Size:
< 1K
License:
1. Title of Database: Wine recognition data | |
Updated Sept 21, 1998 by C.Blake : Added attribute information | |
2. Sources: | |
(a) Forina, M. et al, PARVUS - An Extendible Package for Data | |
Exploration, Classification and Correlation. Institute of Pharmaceutical | |
and Food Analysis and Technologies, Via Brigata Salerno, | |
16147 Genoa, Italy. | |
(b) Stefan Aeberhard, email: stefan@coral.cs.jcu.edu.au | |
(c) July 1991 | |
3. Past Usage: | |
(1) | |
S. Aeberhard, D. Coomans and O. de Vel, | |
Comparison of Classifiers in High Dimensional Settings, | |
Tech. Rep. no. 92-02, (1992), Dept. of Computer Science and Dept. of | |
Mathematics and Statistics, James Cook University of North Queensland. | |
(Also submitted to Technometrics). | |
The data was used with many others for comparing various | |
classifiers. The classes are separable, though only RDA | |
has achieved 100% correct classification. | |
(RDA : 100%, QDA 99.4%, LDA 98.9%, 1NN 96.1% (z-transformed data)) | |
(All results using the leave-one-out technique) | |
In a classification context, this is a well posed problem | |
with "well behaved" class structures. A good data set | |
for first testing of a new classifier, but not very | |
challenging. | |
(2) | |
S. Aeberhard, D. Coomans and O. de Vel, | |
"THE CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE OF RDA" | |
Tech. Rep. no. 92-01, (1992), Dept. of Computer Science and Dept. of | |
Mathematics and Statistics, James Cook University of North Queensland. | |
(Also submitted to Journal of Chemometrics). | |
Here, the data was used to illustrate the superior performance of | |
the use of a new appreciation function with RDA. | |
4. Relevant Information: | |
-- These data are the results of a chemical analysis of | |
wines grown in the same region in Italy but derived from three | |
different cultivars. | |
The analysis determined the quantities of 13 constituents | |
found in each of the three types of wines. | |
-- I think that the initial data set had around 30 variables, but | |
for some reason I only have the 13 dimensional version. | |
I had a list of what the 30 or so variables were, but a.) | |
I lost it, and b.), I would not know which 13 variables | |
are included in the set. | |
-- The attributes are (dontated by Riccardo Leardi, | |
riclea@anchem.unige.it ) | |
1) Alcohol | |
2) Malic acid | |
3) Ash | |
4) Alcalinity of ash | |
5) Magnesium | |
6) Total phenols | |
7) Flavanoids | |
8) Nonflavanoid phenols | |
9) Proanthocyanins | |
10)Color intensity | |
11)Hue | |
12)OD280/OD315 of diluted wines | |
13)Proline | |
5. Number of Instances | |
class 1 59 | |
class 2 71 | |
class 3 48 | |
6. Number of Attributes | |
13 | |
7. For Each Attribute: | |
All attributes are continuous | |
No statistics available, but suggest to standardise | |
variables for certain uses (e.g. for us with classifiers | |
which are NOT scale invariant) | |
NOTE: 1st attribute is class identifier (1-3) | |
8. Missing Attribute Values: | |
None | |
9. Class Distribution: number of instances per class | |
class 1 59 | |
class 2 71 | |
class 3 48 | |