Answer: The economy of Utrecht depends for a large part on the several large institutions located in the city

Context: Production industry constitutes a small part of the economy of Utrecht. The economy of Utrecht depends for a large part on the several large institutions located in the city. It is the centre of the Dutch railroad network and the location of the head office of Nederlandse Spoorwegen. ProRail is headquartered in The De Inktpot (nl) (The Inkpot) – the largest brick building in the Netherlands (the "UFO" featured on its façade stems from an art program in 2000). Rabobank, a large bank, has its headquarters in Utrecht.

Question: What does Utrecht's economy depend on


Answer: It is the centre of the Dutch railroad network and the location of the head office of Nederlandse Spoorwegen

Question: what is centered in Utrecht


Answer: Rabobank, a large bank, has its headquarters in Utrecht.

Question: What bank is head quartered in Utrecht


Answer: Hoog Catharijne

Context: A large indoor shopping centre Hoog Catharijne (nl) is located between Utrecht Centraal railway station and the city centre. The corridors are treated as public places like streets, and the route between the station and the city centre is open all night. In 20 years from 2004, parts of Hoog Catharijne will be redeveloped as part of the renovation of the larger station area. Parts of the city's network of canals, which were filled to create the shopping center and central station area, will be recreated. The Jaarbeurs, one of the largest convention centres in the Netherlands, is located at the west side of the central railway station.

Question: What is the name of the large shopping center


Answer: The corridors are treated as public places like streets, and the route between the station and the city centre is open all night

Question: how are the shopping center corridors treated


Answer: Parts of the city's network of canals, which were filled to create the shopping center and central station area, will be recreated

Question: What is being recreated


Answer: The Jaarbeurs, one of the largest convention centres in the Netherlands, is located at the west side of the central railway station

Question: what is located on the west side of the rail station


Answer: The most prominent of these is Utrecht University (est. 1636), the largest university of the Netherlands with 30,449 students

Context: Utrecht hosts several large institutions of higher education. The most prominent of these is Utrecht University (est. 1636), the largest university of the Netherlands with 30,449 students (as of 2012). The university is partially based in the inner city as well as in the Uithof campus area, to the east of the city. According to Shanghai Jiaotong University's university ranking in 2014 it is the 57th best university in the world. Utrecht also houses the much smaller University of Humanistic Studies, which houses about 400 students.

Question: What is the largest University in the city


Answer: According to Shanghai Jiaotong University's university ranking in 2014 it is the 57th best university in the world

Question: what is shanghai jiaotong rated


Answer: Utrecht also houses the much smaller University of Humanistic Studies, which houses about 400 students.

Question: What smaller university is in Utrecht


Answer: Utrecht city has an active cultural life, and in the Netherlands is second only to Amsterdam

Context: Utrecht city has an active cultural life, and in the Netherlands is second only to Amsterdam. There are several theatres and theatre companies. The 1941 main city theatre was built by Dudok. Besides theatres there is a large number of cinemas including three arthouse cinemas. Utrecht is host to the international Early Music Festival (Festival Oude Muziek, for music before 1800) and the Netherlands Film Festival. The city has an important classical music hall Vredenburg (1979 by Herman Hertzberger). Its acoustics are considered among the best of the 20th-century original music halls.[citation needed] The original Vredenburg music hall has been redeveloped as part of the larger station area redevelopment plan and in 2014 has gained additional halls that allowed its merger with the rock club Tivoli and the SJU jazzpodium. There are several other venues for music throughout the city. Young musicians are educated in the conservatory, a department of the Utrecht School of the Arts. There is a specialised museum of automatically playing musical instruments.

Question: Cultural life in Utrecht is second to


Answer: Utrecht is host to the international Early Music Festival (Festival Oude Muziek, for music before 1800) and the Netherlands Film Festival

Question: What music festival does Utrecht host


Answer: The city has an important classical music hall Vredenburg

Question: What is the name of the music hall


Answer: Young musicians are educated in the conservatory, a department of the Utrecht School of the Arts

Question: Where are music students educated


Answer: Training of artists is done at the Utrecht School of the Arts

Context: There are many art galleries in Utrecht. There are also several foundations to support art and artists. Training of artists is done at the Utrecht School of the Arts. The Centraal Museum has many exhibitions on the arts, including a permanent exhibition on the works of Utrecht resident illustrator Dick Bruna, who is best known for creating Miffy ("Nijntje", in Dutch). Although street art is illegal in Utrecht, the Utrechtse Kabouter, a picture of a gnome with a red hat, became a common sight in 2004. Utrecht also houses one of the landmarks of modern architecture, the 1924 Rietveld Schröder House, which is listed on UNESCO's world heritage sites.

Question: Where are young artist trained


Answer: Although street art is illegal in Utrecht

Question: Is street art legal


Answer: 1924 Rietveld Schröder House, which is listed on UNESCO's world heritage sites

Question: What is considered landmark Architecture


Answer: To promote culture Utrecht city organizes cultural Sundays

Context: To promote culture Utrecht city organizes cultural Sundays. During a thematic Sunday several organisations create a program, which is open to everyone without, or with a very much reduced, admission fee. There are also initiatives for amateur artists. The city subsidises an organisation for amateur education in arts aimed at all inhabitants (Utrechts Centrum voor de Kunsten), as does the university for its staff and students. Additionally there are also several private initiatives. The city council provides coupons for discounts to inhabitants who receive welfare to be used with many of the initiatives.

Question: What does the city host on Sundays


Answer: thematic Sunday several organisations create a program, which is open to everyone without, or with a very much reduced, admission fee

Question: What happens on Cultural Sunday


Answer: an organisation for amateur education in arts aimed at all inhabitants (Utrechts Centrum voor de Kunsten

Question: What does the city subsidise


Answer: The city council provides coupons for discounts to inhabitants who receive welfare to be used with many of the initiatives.

Question: What type of coupon does the city provide the poor


Answer: Utrecht is home to the premier league (professional) football club FC Utrecht

Context: Utrecht is home to the premier league (professional) football club FC Utrecht, which plays in Stadium Nieuw Galgenwaard. It is also the home of Kampong, the largest (amateur) sportsclub in the Netherlands (4,500 members), SV Kampong. Kampong features fieldhockey, soccer, cricket, tennis, squash and jeu de boules. Kampong's men and women top hockey squads play in the highest Dutch hockey league, the Rabohoofdklasse.Utrecht is also home to the baseball and Sofball club: UVV which plays in the highest Dutch baseball league: de Hoofdklasse. Utrecht's waterways are used by several rowing clubs. Viking is a large club open to the general public, and the student clubs Orca and Triton compete in the Varsity each year.

Question: What football team is Utrecht home to


Answer: Utrecht's waterways are used by several rowing clubs

Question: What Utrecht waterways host to


Answer: Kampong, the largest (amateur) sportsclub in the Netherlands (4,500 members)

Question: What is kampong


Answer: Kampong features fieldhockey, soccer, cricket, tennis, squash and jeu de boules.

Question: What sports does Kampong support


Answer: Hungarian

Context: John von Neumann (/vɒn ˈnɔɪmən/; Hungarian: Neumann János Lajos, pronounced [ˈnɒjmɒn ˈjaːnoʃ ˈlɒjoʃ]; December 28, 1903 – February 8, 1957) was a Hungarian-American pure and applied mathematician, physicist, inventor, computer scientist, and polymath. He made major contributions to a number of fields, including mathematics (foundations of mathematics, functional analysis, ergodic theory, geometry, topology, and numerical analysis), physics (quantum mechanics, hydrodynamics, fluid dynamics and quantum statistical mechanics), economics (game theory), computing (Von Neumann architecture, linear programming, self-replicating machines, stochastic computing), and statistics.

Question: What is John von Neumann's nationality?


Answer: December 28, 1903

Question: When was John von Neumann born?


Answer: February 8, 1957

Question: When did John von Neumann die?


Answer: game theory

Question: What was John von Neumann's major contribution to economics?


Answer: Von Neumann architecture

Question: What computing structure is named after John von Neumann?


Answer: December 28, 1903

Question: What was the birth date of John Von Neumann?


Answer: February 8, 1957

Question: When did John Von Neuman die?


Answer: pure and applied mathematician, physicist, inventor, computer scientist, and polymath

Question: What were the occupations that Von Neuman held?


Answer: Von Neumann architecture, linear programming, self-replicating machines, stochastic computing

Question: What were Von Neuman's contributions to the field of computing?


Answer: 150

Context: He was a pioneer of the application of operator theory to quantum mechanics, in the development of functional analysis, a principal member of the Manhattan Project and the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton (as one of the few originally appointed), and a key figure in the development of game theory and the concepts of cellular automata, the universal constructor and the digital computer. He published 150 papers in his life; 60 in pure mathematics, 20 in physics, and 60 in applied mathematics. His last work, an unfinished manuscript written while in the hospital, was later published in book form as The Computer and the Brain.

Question: How many papers did Von Neumann publish?


Answer: The Computer and the Brain

Question: What is the name of Von Neumann's last work?


Answer: Manhattan Project

Question: What high profile controversial project was Von Neumann a prinipal of?


Answer: 60 in pure mathematics, 20 in physics, and 60 in applied mathematics

Question: Of his published works, what topics were they covering?


Answer: mathematical analysis of the structure of self-replication

Context: Von Neumann's mathematical analysis of the structure of self-replication preceded the discovery of the structure of DNA. In a short list of facts about his life he submitted to the National Academy of Sciences, he stated "The part of my work I consider most essential is that on quantum mechanics, which developed in Göttingen in 1926, and subsequently in Berlin in 1927–1929. Also, my work on various forms of operator theory, Berlin 1930 and Princeton 1935–1939; on the ergodic theorem, Princeton, 1931–1932."

Question: Von Neumann's study of what preceded the discovery of DNA?


Answer: quantum mechanics

Question: What part of his work did Von Neumann consider to be his most important?


Answer: Göttingen

Question: Where was quantum mechanics developed?


Answer: operator theory

Question: What work did Von Nemann do in Berlin in 1930 and Princeton 1935 - 39?


Answer: ergodic theorem

Question: What was the topic of Von Neumann's work at Princeton in 1931 - 32?


Answer: J. Robert Oppenheimer and Edward Teller

Context: During World War II he worked on the Manhattan Project with J. Robert Oppenheimer and Edward Teller, developing the mathematical models behind the explosive lenses used in the implosion-type nuclear weapon. After the war, he served on the General Advisory Committee of the United States Atomic Energy Commission, and later as one of its commissioners. He was a consultant to a number of organizations, including the United States Air Force, the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project, and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Along with theoretical physicist Edward Teller, mathematician Stanislaw Ulam, and others, he worked out key steps in the nuclear physics involved in thermonuclear reactions and the hydrogen bomb.

Question: With whom did Von Neumann work on the Manhattan Project?


Answer: General Advisory Committee of the United States Atomic Energy Commission

Question: Post World War II, in what role did Von Neumann work?


Answer: United States Air Force, the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project, and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Question: For what organizations was Von Neumann a consultant after World War II?


Answer: key steps in the nuclear physics involved in thermonuclear reactions and the hydrogen bomb

Question: What keys steps did Von Neumann work out that contributed to weapons of war?


Answer: Budapest

Context: Von Neumann was born Neumann János Lajos (in Hungarian the family name comes first), Hebrew name Yonah, in Budapest, Kingdom of Hungary, which was then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, to wealthy Jewish parents of the Haskalah. He was the eldest of three children. He had two younger brothers: Michael, born in 1907, and Nicholas, who was born in 1911. His father, Neumann Miksa (Max Neumann) was a banker, who held a doctorate in law. He had moved to Budapest from Pécs at the end of the 1880s. Miksa's father and grandfather were both born in Ond (now part of the town of Szerencs), Zemplén County, northern Hungary. John's mother was Kann Margit (Margaret Kann); her parents were Jakab Kann and Katalin Meisels. Three generations of the Kann family lived in spacious apartments above the Kann-Heller offices in Budapest; von Neumann's family occupied an 18-room apartment on the top floor.

Question: Where was Von Neumann born?


Answer: two younger brothers

Question: Did Von Neumann have any siblings?


Answer: banker

Question: What occupation did Von Neumann father hold?


Answer: end of the 1880s

Question: When did Von Neuman's father move from Pecs to Budapest?


Answer: Kann Margit

Question: What was Von Neumann's mother's name?


Answer: 1913

Context: In 1913, his father was elevated to the nobility for his service to the Austro-Hungarian Empire by Emperor Franz Joseph. The Neumann family thus acquired the hereditary appellation Margittai, meaning of Marghita. The family had no connection with the town; the appellation was chosen in reference to Margaret, as was those chosen coat of arms depicting three marguerites. Neumann János became Margittai Neumann János (John Neumann of Marghita), which he later changed to the German Johann von Neumann.

Question: In what year was Von Neumann's father elevated to nobility?


Answer: Emperor Franz Joseph

Question: What Emperor elevated Von Neumann's father to nobility?


Answer: Marghita

Question: What town did Von Neumann's family become associated when elevated to nobility?


Answer: Margittai Neumann János

Question: What was Von Neumann's given name as member of Austro-Hungarian nobility?


Answer: ten

Context: Formal schooling did not start in Hungary until the age of ten. Instead, governesses taught von Neumann, his brothers and his cousins. Max believed that knowledge of languages other than Hungarian was essential, so the children were tutored in English, French, German and Italian. By the age of 8, von Neumann was familiar with differential and integral calculus, but he was particularly interested in history, reading his way through Wilhelm Oncken's Allgemeine Geschichte in Einzeldarstellungen. A copy was contained in a private library Max purchased. One of the rooms in the apartment was converted into a library and reading room, with bookshelves from ceiling to floor.

Question: At what age did schooling begin in Hungary?


Answer: governesses

Question: Who taught children before they began school in Hungary?


Answer: English, French, German and Italian

Question: What languages were Von Neumann and his siblings taught?


Answer: 8

Question: At what age was Von Neumann familiar with calculus?


Answer: Lutheran Fasori Evangelikus Gimnázium

Context: Von Neumann entered the Lutheran Fasori Evangelikus Gimnázium in 1911. This was one of the best schools in Budapest, part of a brilliant education system designed for the elite. Under the Hungarian system, children received all their education at the one gymnasium. Despite being run by the Lutheran Church, the majority of its pupils were Jewish. The school system produced a generation noted for intellectual achievement, that included Theodore von Kármán (b. 1881), George de Hevesy (b. 1885), Leó Szilárd (b. 1898), Eugene Wigner (b. 1902), Edward Teller (b. 1908), and Paul Erdős (b. 1913). Collectively, they were sometimes known as Martians. Wigner was a year ahead of von Neumann at the Lutheran School. When asked why the Hungary of his generation had produced so many geniuses, Wigner, who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1963, replied that von Neumann was the only genius.

Question: What did Von Neumann enter in 1911?


Answer: gymnasium

Question: In what room did children get education in Hungary?


Answer: Martians

Question: What collective name was given to the generation of scholars produced by the Hungarian school system?


Answer: 1963

Question: In what year did Wigner win Nobel Prize?


Answer: 15

Context: Although Max insisted von Neumann attend school at the grade level appropriate to his age, he agreed to hire private tutors to give him advanced instruction in those areas in which he had displayed an aptitude. At the age of 15, he began to study advanced calculus under the renowned analyst Gábor Szegő. On their first meeting, Szegő was so astounded with the boy's mathematical talent that he was brought to tears. Some of von Neumann's instant solutions to the problems in calculus posed by Szegő, sketched out on his father's stationery, are still on display at the von Neumann archive in Budapest. By the age of 19, von Neumann had published two major mathematical papers, the second of which gave the modern definition of ordinal numbers, which superseded Georg Cantor's definition. At the conclusion of his education at the gymnasium, von Neumann sat for and won the Eötvös Prize, a national prize for mathematics.

Question: At what age did Von Neumann begin to study advance calculus?


Answer: Gábor Szegő

Question: Who did Von Neumann begin his studies of advanced calculus under?


Answer: two major mathematical papers

Question: By 19 how many papers had Von Neumann published?


Answer: Georg Cantor

Question: Von Neumann's modern definition of ordinal numbers superseded whose definition?


Answer: Eötvös Prize, a national prize for mathematics

Question: What prize did Von Neuman win at the conclusion of his gymansium formal education?


Answer: chemical engineer

Context: Since there were few posts in Hungary for mathematicians, and those were not well-paid, his father wanted von Neumann to follow him into industry and therefore invest his time in a more financially useful endeavor than mathematics. So it was decided that the best career path was to become a chemical engineer. This was not something that von Neumann had much knowledge of, so it was arranged for him to take a two-year non-degree course in chemistry at the University of Berlin, after which he sat the entrance exam to the prestigious ETH Zurich, which he passed in September 1923. At the same time, von Neumann also entered Pázmány Péter University in Budapest, as a Ph.D. candidate in mathematics. For his thesis, he chose to produce an axiomatization of Cantor's set theory. He passed his final examinations for his Ph.D. soon after graduating from ETH Zurich in 1926. He then went to the University of Göttingen on a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation to study mathematics under David Hilbert.

Question: What career path was decided upon for Von Neuman?


Answer: University of Berlin

Question: At what university was it arranged for Von Neumann to enter a chemistry program?


Answer: Pázmány Péter University in Budapest

Question: Where did Von Neumann study as a PHD candidate?


Answer: axiomatization of Cantor's set theory

Question: What was the topic of Von Neuman's thesis?


Answer: University of Berlin

Context: Von Neumann's habilitation was completed on December 13, 1927, and he started his lectures as a privatdozent at the University of Berlin in 1928. By the end of 1927, von Neumann had published twelve major papers in mathematics, and by the end of 1929, thirty-two papers, at a rate of nearly one major paper per month. His reputed powers of speedy, massive memorization and recall allowed him to recite volumes of information, and even entire directories, with ease. In 1929, he briefly became a privatdozent at the University of Hamburg, where the prospects of becoming a tenured professor were better, but in October of that year a better offer presented itself when he was invited to Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey.

Question: Where did Von Neumann begin to lecture in 1928?


Answer: twelve major papers in mathematics

Question: By the end of 1927 how many papers had Von Neuman written?


Answer: thirty-two papers

Question: How many papers had Von Neumann written by 1929?


Answer: Princeton University

Question: What better offer came for Von Neumann in 1930?


Answer: New Year's Day in 1930

Context: On New Year's Day in 1930, von Neumann married Mariette Kövesi, who had studied economics at the Budapest University. Before his marriage he was baptized a Catholic. Max had died in 1929. None of the family had converted to Christianity while he was alive, but afterwards they all did. They had one child, a daughter, Marina, who is now a distinguished professor of business administration and public policy at the University of Michigan. The couple divorced in 1937. In October 1938, von Neumann married Klara Dan, whom he had met during his last trips back to Budapest prior to the outbreak of World War II.

Question: When did Von Neumann get married?


Answer: Mariette Kövesi

Question: What was Von Neumann's wife's name?


Answer: he was baptized a Catholic.

Question: Before marriage what faith did Von Neumann join?


Answer: Marina

Question: What was Von Neumann's child's name?


Answer: October 1938

Question: When did Von Neumann get married for a second time?


Answer: 1933

Context: In 1933, von Neumann was offered a lifetime professorship on the faculty of the Institute for Advanced Study when the institute's plan to appoint Hermann Weyl fell through. He remained a mathematics professor there until his death, although he announced that shortly before his intention to resign and become a professor at large at the University of California. His mother, brothers and in-laws followed John to the United States in 1939. Von Neumann anglicized his first name to John, keeping the German-aristocratic surname of von Neumann. His brothers changed theirs to "Neumann" and "Vonneumann". Von Neumann became a naturalized citizen of the United States in 1937, and immediately tried to become a lieutenant in the United States Army's Officers Reserve Corps. He passed the exams easily, but was ultimately rejected because of his age. His prewar analysis is often quoted. Asked about how France would stand up to Germany he said "Oh, France won't matter."

Question: In what year was Von Neumann offered a lifetime professorship?


Answer: 1939

Question: In what year did Von Neumann's mother and siblings join him in U.S?


Answer: 1937

Question: In what year did Von Neumann become a naturalized citizen of US?


Answer: age

Question: Why was Neuman rejected from joining US Army?


Answer: limericks

Context: Von Neumann liked to eat and drink; his wife, Klara, said that he could count everything except calories. He enjoyed Yiddish and "off-color" humor (especially limericks). He was a non-smoker. At Princeton he received complaints for regularly playing extremely loud German march music on his gramophone, which distracted those in neighbouring offices, including Albert Einstein, from their work. Von Neumann did some of his best work blazingly fast in noisy, chaotic environments, and once admonished his wife for preparing a quiet study for him to work in. He never used it, preferring the couple's living room with its television playing loudly.

Question: What type of "off color" humor did Von Neumann especially enjoy?


Answer: regularly playing extremely loud German march music

Question: What complaints did Von Neumann's neighbor's have?


Answer: Albert Einstein,

Question: What famous neighbor did Von Neumann have that may have been distracted by the music Von Neumann played?


Answer: Stanislaw Ulam

Context: Von Neumann's closest friend in the United States was mathematician Stanislaw Ulam. A later friend of Ulam's, Gian-Carlo Rota writes: "They would spend hours on end gossiping and giggling, swapping Jewish jokes, and drifting in and out of mathematical talk." When von Neumann was dying in hospital, every time Ulam would visit he would come prepared with a new collection of jokes to cheer up his friend. He believed that much of his mathematical thought occurred intuitively, and he would often go to sleep with a problem unsolved, and know the answer immediately upon waking up.

Question: What mathematician was Von Nemann's closest friend?


Answer: gossiping and giggling, swapping Jewish jokes, and drifting in and out of mathematical talk

Question: What topics of conversation would Ulam and Von Neumann typically share?


Answer: a new collection of jokes

Question: What would Ulam use to cheer up Von Neumann in the hospital?


Answer: Russell's paradox

Context: The axiomatization of mathematics, on the model of Euclid's Elements, had reached new levels of rigour and breadth at the end of the 19th century, particularly in arithmetic, thanks to the axiom schema of Richard Dedekind and Charles Sanders Peirce, and geometry, thanks to David Hilbert. At the beginning of the 20th century, efforts to base mathematics on naive set theory suffered a setback due to Russell's paradox (on the set of all sets that do not belong to themselves). The problem of an adequate axiomatization of set theory was resolved implicitly about twenty years later by Ernst Zermelo and Abraham Fraenkel. Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory provided a series of principles that allowed for the construction of the sets used in the everyday practice of mathematics. But they did not explicitly exclude the possibility of the existence of a set that belongs to itself. In his doctoral thesis of 1925, von Neumann demonstrated two techniques to exclude such sets—the axiom of foundation and the notion of class.

Question: What caused a setback in naive set theory at the beginning of 20th century?


Answer: Ernst Zermelo and Abraham Fraenkel

Question: Who resolved the problem of adequate axiomatization of set theory?


Answer: the axiom of foundation and the notion of class.

Question: What 2 techniques did Von Neumann use to exclude sets in his doctoral thesis in 1925?


Answer: method of inner models

Context: The axiom of foundation established that every set can be constructed from the bottom up in an ordered succession of steps by way of the principles of Zermelo and Fraenkel, in such a manner that if one set belongs to another then the first must necessarily come before the second in the succession, hence excluding the possibility of a set belonging to itself. To demonstrate that the addition of this new axiom to the others did not produce contradictions, von Neumann introduced a method of demonstration, called the method of inner models, which later became an essential instrument in set theory.

Question: What is the method to demonstrate that no contradictions were created by the addition of axiom of foundation?


Answer: from the bottom up in an ordered succession of steps

Question: Zermelo and Fraenkel's axiom of foundation established that every set be constructed how?


Answer: if one set belongs to another then the first must necessarily come before the second in the succession

Question: What excluded a set from belonging to itself in set theory?


Answer: a class which does not belong to other classes

Context: The second approach to the problem took as its base the notion of class, and defines a set as a class which belongs to other classes, while a proper class is defined as a class which does not belong to other classes. Under the Zermelo–Fraenkel approach, the axioms impede the construction of a set of all sets which do not belong to themselves. In contrast, under the von Neumann approach, the class of all sets which do not belong to themselves can be constructed, but it is a proper class and not a set.

Question: What is a proper class?


Answer: Zermelo–Fraenkel

Question: Under what approach does an axiom impede a set of all sets which do not belong to themselves?


Answer: class of all sets which do not belong to themselves can be constructed, but it is a proper class and not a set.

Question: Under Von Neumann's approach can a class of all sets that do not belong to themselves be constructed?


Answer: Kurt Gödel

Context: With this contribution of von Neumann, the axiomatic system of the theory of sets became fully satisfactory, and the next question was whether or not it was also definitive, and not subject to improvement. A strongly negative answer arrived in September 1930 at the historic mathematical Congress of Königsberg, in which Kurt Gödel announced his first theorem of incompleteness: the usual axiomatic systems are incomplete, in the sense that they cannot prove every truth which is expressible in their language. This result was sufficiently innovative as to confound the majority of mathematicians of the time.

Question: In 1930 who gave a strongly negative answer to Von Neuman's approach to the axiomatic system of theory of sets?


Answer: they cannot prove every truth which is expressible in their language

Question: What was the central theme of Godel's announcement that the axiomatic system was not complete?


Answer: Congress of Königsberg

Question: Where was Godel's statement about axiomatic system made in 1930?


Answer: less than a month

Context: But von Neumann, who had participated at the Congress, confirmed his fame as an instantaneous thinker, and in less than a month was able to communicate to Gödel himself an interesting consequence of his theorem: namely that the usual axiomatic systems are unable to demonstrate their own consistency. However, Gödel had already discovered this consequence, now known as his second incompleteness theorem and sent von Neumann a preprint of his article containing both incompleteness theorems. Von Neumann acknowledged Gödel's priority in his next letter. He never thought much of "the American system of claiming personal priority for everything."

Question: How long did it take von Neumann to figure a response to theory of incompleteness?


Answer: usual axiomatic systems are unable to demonstrate their own consistency

Question: What was the consequence of the theory of incompleteness?


Answer: second incompleteness theorem

Question: Upon revising the theory of incompleteness, what was the name of the new Godel theory?


Answer: continuous geometry.

Context: Von Neumann founded the field of continuous geometry. It followed his path-breaking work on rings of operators. In mathematics, continuous geometry is an analogue of complex projective geometry, where instead of the dimension of a subspace being in a discrete set 0, 1, ..., n, it can be an element of the unit interval [0,1]. Von Neumann was motivated by his discovery of von Neumann algebras with a dimension function taking a continuous range of dimensions, and the first example of a continuous geometry other than projective space was the projections of the hyperfinite type II factor.

Question: What field did Von Neuman establish?


Answer: instead of the dimension of a subspace being in a discrete set 0, 1, ..., n, it can be an element of the unit interval

Question: What is the distinction of continuous geometry?


Answer: projections of the hyperfinite type II factor

Question: What was the first example of continuous geometry?


Answer: In a series of famous papers

Context: In a series of famous papers, von Neumann made spectacular contributions to measure theory. The work of Banach had implied that the problem of measure has a positive solution if n = 1 or n = 2 and a negative solution in all other cases. Von Neumann's work argued that the "problem is essentially group-theoretic in character, and that, in particular, for the solvability of the problem of measure the ordinary algebraic concept of solvability of a group is relevant. Thus, according to von Neumann, it is the change of group that makes a difference, not the change of space."

Question: In what way did von Neumann make spectacular contributions to measure theory?


Answer: algebraic concept of solvability of a group is relevant

Question: What concept was relevant to the solvability of the problem of measure?


Answer: change of group that makes a difference, not the change of space

Question: According to von Neumann what is the most important part of the problem of measure?


Answer: methods of argument he employed

Context: In a number of von Neumann's papers, the methods of argument he employed are considered even more significant than the results. In anticipation of his later study of dimension theory in algebras of operators, von Neumann used results on equivalence by finite decomposition, and reformulated the problem of measure in terms of functions. In his 1936 paper on analytic measure theory, he used the Haar theorem in the solution of Hilbert's fifth problem in the case of compact groups. In 1938, he was awarded the Bôcher Memorial Prize for his work in analysis.

Question: What is often considered more important than the results of von Neumann's papers?


Answer: Bôcher Memorial Prize

Question: In 1938 what was von Neumann awarded?


Answer: Hilbert's fifth problem in the case of compact groups

Question: What did von Neumann use the Haar theorem to solve in a 1936 paper?


Answer: algebra of bounded operators on a Hilbert space that is closed in the weak operator topology and contains the identity operator

Context: Von Neumann introduced the study of rings of operators, through the von Neumann algebras. A von Neumann algebra is a *-algebra of bounded operators on a Hilbert space that is closed in the weak operator topology and contains the identity operator. The von Neumann bicommutant theorem shows that the analytic definition is equivalent to a purely algebraic definition as an algebra of symmetries. The direct integral was introduced in 1949 by John von Neumann. One of von Neumann's analyses was to reduce the classification of von Neumann algebras on separable Hilbert spaces to the classification of factors.

Question: What is von Neumann algebra?


Answer: the analytic definition is equivalent to a purely algebraic definition as an algebra of symmetries.

Question: What does the von Neumann bicommutant theorem show?


Answer: 1949

Question: When was direct integral introduced by von Neumann?


Answer: study of rings of operators

Question: What was introduced in von Neumann algebras?


Answer: lattice theory

Context: Von Neumann worked on lattice theory between 1937 and 1939. Von Neumann provided an abstract exploration of dimension in completed complemented modular topological lattices: "Dimension is determined, up to a positive linear transformation, by the following two properties. It is conserved by perspective mappings ("perspectivities") and ordered by inclusion. The deepest part of the proof concerns the equivalence of perspectivity with "projectivity by decomposition"—of which a corollary is the transitivity of perspectivity." Garrett Birkhoff writes: "John von Neumann's brilliant mind blazed over lattice theory like a meteor".

Question: What did von Neumann work on in 1937 - 39?


Answer: conserved by perspective mappings ("perspectivities") and ordered by inclusion

Question: What properties determine dimension in lattice theory?


Answer: Garrett Birkhoff

Question: Who wrote that "John von Neumann's brilliant mind blazed over lattice theory like a meteor?"


Answer: novel axioms

Context: Additionally, "[I]n the general case, von Neumann proved the following basic representation theorem. Any complemented modular lattice L having a "basis" of n≥4 pairwise perspective elements, is isomorphic with the lattice ℛ(R) of all principal right-ideals of a suitable regular ring R. This conclusion is the culmination of 140 pages of brilliant and incisive algebra involving entirely novel axioms. Anyone wishing to get an unforgettable impression of the razor edge of von Neumann's mind, need merely try to pursue this chain of exact reasoning for himself—realizing that often five pages of it were written down before breakfast, seated at a living room writing-table in a bathrobe."

Question: What type of axioms were used by von Neumann in his lattice work?


Answer: 140 pages

Question: How long was von Neumann's lattice theory paper?


Answer: living room writing-table

Question: In what room did von Neumann often write at home?


Answer: Von Neumann

Context: Von Neumann was the first to establish a rigorous mathematical framework for quantum mechanics, known as the Dirac–von Neumann axioms, with his 1932 work Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. After having completed the axiomatization of set theory, he began to confront the axiomatization of quantum mechanics. He realized, in 1926, that a state of a quantum system could be represented by a point in a (complex) Hilbert space that, in general, could be infinite-dimensional even for a single particle. In this formalism of quantum mechanics, observable quantities such as position or momentum are represented as linear operators acting on the Hilbert space associated with the quantum system.

Question: Who established the framework for quantum mechanics?


Answer: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Question: What paper did von Neumann produce in 1932?


Answer: axiomatization of set theory

Question: What von Neumann work preceded the axiomatiztion of quatum mechanics?


Answer: mathematics of Hilbert spaces and linear operators acting on them

Context: The physics of quantum mechanics was thereby reduced to the mathematics of Hilbert spaces and linear operators acting on them. For example, the uncertainty principle, according to which the determination of the position of a particle prevents the determination of its momentum and vice versa, is translated into the non-commutativity of the two corresponding operators. This new mathematical formulation included as special cases the formulations of both Heisenberg and Schrödinger. When Heisenberg was informed von Neumann had clarified the difference between an unbounded operator that was a Self-adjoint operator and one that was merely symmetric, Heisenberg replied "Eh? What is the difference?"

Question: What are the physics of quantum mechanics?


Answer: determination of the position of a particle prevents the determination of its momentum and vice versa

Question: What is the uncertainty principle?


Answer: formulations of both Heisenberg and Schrödinger

Question: The physics of quantum mechanics included special cases for what work?


Answer: determinism versus non-determinism

Context: Von Neumann's abstract treatment permitted him also to confront the foundational issue of determinism versus non-determinism, and in the book he presented a proof that the statistical results of quantum mechanics could not possibly be averages of an underlying set of determined "hidden variables," as in classical statistical mechanics. In 1966, John S. Bell published a paper arguing that the proof contained a conceptual error and was therefore invalid. However, in 2010, Jeffrey Bub argued that Bell had misconstrued von Neumann's proof, and pointed out that the proof, though not valid for all hidden variable theories, does rule out a well-defined and important subset. Bub also suggests that von Neumann was aware of this limitation, and that von Neumann did not claim that his proof completely ruled out hidden variable theories.

Question: Von Neumann's abstract treatment allowed him to work on what foundational issue?


Answer: proof contained a conceptual error and was therefore invalid

Question: What was John Bell's argument?


Answer: Bell had misconstrued von Neumann's proof

Question: What did Jeffrey Bub argue in 2010?


Answer: von Neumann did not claim that his proof completely ruled out hidden variable theories

Question: Did von Neumann rule hidden variable theories?


Answer: physical universe could be made subject to the universal wave function

Context: In a chapter of The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, von Neumann deeply analyzed the so-called measurement problem. He concluded that the entire physical universe could be made subject to the universal wave function. Since something "outside the calculation" was needed to collapse the wave function, von Neumann concluded that the collapse was caused by the consciousness of the experimenter (although this view was accepted by Eugene Wigner, the Von Neumann–Wigner interpretation never gained acceptance amongst the majority of physicists).

Question: What results came from von Neumann's deep analysis of the measurement problem?


Answer: consciousness of the experimenter

Question: What "outside of calculation" variable could initiate collapse in von Neumann's conclusion?


Answer: Von Neumann–Wigner interpretation never gained acceptance amongst the majority of physicists

Question: Were von Neumann's conclusions of collapse of entire universe cause accepted widely?


Answer: Garrett Birkhoff

Context: In a famous paper of 1936 with Garrett Birkhoff, the first work ever to introduce quantum logics, von Neumann and Birkhoff first proved that quantum mechanics requires a propositional calculus substantially different from all classical logics and rigorously isolated a new algebraic structure for quantum logics. The concept of creating a propositional calculus for quantum logic was first outlined in a short section in von Neumann's 1932 work, but in 1936, the need for the new propositional calculus was demonstrated through several proofs. For example, photons cannot pass through two successive filters that are polarized perpendicularly (e.g., one horizontally and the other vertically), and therefore, a fortiori, it cannot pass if a third filter polarized diagonally is added to the other two, either before or after them in the succession, but if the third filter is added in between the other two, the photons will, indeed, pass through. This experimental fact is translatable into logic as the non-commutativity of conjunction . It was also demonstrated that the laws of distribution of classical logic, and , are not valid for quantum theory.

Question: With whom did von Neuman work on a paper in 1936 that introduce quantum logic?


Answer: propositional calculus

Question: What concept was created for quatum logic?


Answer: laws of distribution of classical logic, and , are not valid for quantum theory

Question: What is the difference of logic in quantum theory?


Answer: 1928

Context: Von Neumann founded the field of game theory as a mathematical discipline. Von Neumann proved his minimax theorem in 1928. This theorem establishes that in zero-sum games with perfect information (i.e. in which players know at each time all moves that have taken place so far), there exists a pair of strategies for both players that allows each to minimize his maximum losses, hence the name minimax. When examining every possible strategy, a player must consider all the possible responses of his adversary. The player then plays out the strategy that will result in the minimization of his maximum loss.

Question: What year was game theory established?


Answer: mathematical discipline.

Question: What discipline is game theory derived from?


Answer: a pair of strategies for both players that allows each to minimize his maximum losses

Question: what are the possible strategies in minimax theory?


Answer: all the possible responses of his adversary.

Question: What must a player consider when determining every possible strategy?


Answer: can be true even when both of the disjuncts are false

Context: The reason for this is that a quantum disjunction, unlike the case for classical disjunction, can be true even when both of the disjuncts are false and this is, in turn, attributable to the fact that it is frequently the case, in quantum mechanics, that a pair of alternatives are semantically determinate, while each of its members are necessarily indeterminate. This latter property can be illustrated by a simple example. Suppose we are dealing with particles (such as electrons) of semi-integral spin (angular momentum) for which there are only two possible values: positive or negative. Then, a principle of indetermination establishes that the spin, relative to two different directions (e.g., x and y) results in a pair of incompatible quantities. Suppose that the state ɸ of a certain electron verifies the proposition "the spin of the electron in the x direction is positive." By the principle of indeterminacy, the value of the spin in the direction y will be completely indeterminate for ɸ. Hence, ɸ can verify neither the proposition "the spin in the direction of y is positive" nor the proposition "the spin in the direction of y is negative." Nevertheless, the disjunction of the propositions "the spin in the direction of y is positive or the spin in the direction of y is negative" must be true for ɸ. In the case of distribution, it is therefore possible to have a situation in which , while .

Question: What is the difference of quantum disjunction from classic?


Answer: each of its members are necessarily indeterminate

Question: What is frequently the case in quantum mechanics when a pair of alternatives are semantically determinate?


Answer: illustrated by a simple example

Question: How can quantum disjuction be illustrated?


Answer: minimize the maximum loss for each player

Context: Such strategies, which minimize the maximum loss for each player, are called optimal. Von Neumann showed that their minimaxes are equal (in absolute value) and contrary (in sign). Von Neumann improved and extended the minimax theorem to include games involving imperfect information and games with more than two players, publishing this result in his 1944 Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (written with Oskar Morgenstern). Morgenstern wrote a paper on game theory and thought he would show it to von Neumann because of his interest in the subject. He read it and said to Morgenstern that he should put more in it. This was repeated a couple of times, and then von Neumann became a coauthor and the paper became 100 pages long. Then it became a book. The public interest in this work was such that The New York Times ran a front-page story. In this book, von Neumann declared that economic theory needed to use functional analytic methods, especially convex sets and topological fixed-point theorem, rather than the traditional differential calculus, because the maximum-operator did not preserve differentiable functions.

Question: What is optimal strategy?


Answer: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior

Question: What von Neumann work was published in 1944?


Answer: Oskar Morgenstern

Question: Who was co-author with von Neman on the Theory of Games and Economic Behavior?


Answer: several stunning publications

Context: Von Neumann raised the intellectual and mathematical level of economics in several stunning publications. For his model of an expanding economy, von Neumann proved the existence and uniqueness of an equilibrium using his generalization of the Brouwer fixed-point theorem. Von Neumann's model of an expanding economy considered the matrix pencil A − λB with nonnegative matrices A and B; von Neumann sought probability vectors p and q and a positive number λ that would solve the complementarity equation

Question: How did von Neumann raise the level of economics?


Answer: uniqueness of an equilibrium using his generalization of the Brouwer fixed-point theorem

Question: What did von Neumann prove with his model of expanding economy?


Answer: matrix pencil A − λB with nonnegative matrices A and B

Question: What did von Neumann consider for his model of expanding economy?


Answer: p represents the prices of the goods

Context: along with two inequality systems expressing economic efficiency. In this model, the (transposed) probability vector p represents the prices of the goods while the probability vector q represents the "intensity" at which the production process would run. The unique solution λ represents the growth factor which is 1 plus the rate of growth of the economy; the rate of growth equals the interest rate. Proving the existence of a positive growth rate and proving that the growth rate equals the interest rate were remarkable achievements, even for von Neumann.

Question: In von Neumann's model what does p represent?


Answer: q represents the "intensity" at which the production process would run

Question: In von Neumann's model what does q represent?


Answer: rate of growth equals the interest rate

Question: What is the rate of qrowth equal to?


Answer: proving that the growth rate equals the interest rate were remarkable achievements, even for von Neumann

Question: Was the economic model successful?


Answer: viewed as a special case of linear programming

Context: Von Neumann's results have been viewed as a special case of linear programming, where von Neumann's model uses only nonnegative matrices. The study of von Neumann's model of an expanding economy continues to interest mathematical economists with interests in computational economics. This paper has been called the greatest paper in mathematical economics by several authors, who recognized its introduction of fixed-point theorems, linear inequalities, complementary slackness, and saddlepoint duality. In the proceedings of a conference on von Neumann's growth model, Paul Samuelson said that many mathematicians had developed methods useful to economists, but that von Neumann was unique in having made significant contributions to economic theory itself.

Question: What were von Neumann's model an example of?


Answer: unique in having made significant contributions to economic theory itself.

Question: What was the significance of von Neumann's model of expanding economy?


Answer: fixed-point theorems, linear inequalities, complementary slackness, and saddlepoint duality

Question: What ideas were utilized in von Neumann's ecocomic model?


Answer: When lecturing at Berlin in 1928 and 1929

Context: Von Neumann's famous 9-page paper started life as a talk at Princeton and then became a paper in Germany, which was eventually translated into English. His interest in economics that led to that paper began as follows: When lecturing at Berlin in 1928 and 1929 he spent his summers back home in Budapest, and so did the economist Nicholas Kaldor, and they hit it off. Kaldor recommended that von Neumann read a book by the mathematical economist Léon Walras. Von Neumann found some faults in that book and corrected them, for example, replacing equations by inequalities. He noticed that Walras's General Equilibrium Theory and Walras' Law, which led to systems of simultaneous linear equations, could produce the absurd result that the profit could be maximized by producing and selling a negative quantity of a product. He replaced the equations by inequalities, introduced dynamic equilibria, among other things, and eventually produced the paper.

Question: When did von Neumann's interest in economics begin?


Answer: Nicholas Kaldor

Question: What economist did von Neumann get to know that spurred the interest in economics?


Answer: Léon Walras

Question: In who's book did von Neuman find errors in the author's equations?


Answer: homogeneous linear system of Gordan

Context: Later, von Neumann suggested a new method of linear programming, using the homogeneous linear system of Gordan (1873), which was later popularized by Karmarkar's algorithm. Von Neumann's method used a pivoting algorithm between simplices, with the pivoting decision determined by a nonnegative least squares subproblem with a convexity constraint (projecting the zero-vector onto the convex hull of the active simplex). Von Neumann's algorithm was the first interior point method of linear programming.

Question: What was the new method of linear programming that von Neumann suggested?


Answer: pivoting algorithm between simplices

Question: What did von Neuman's method use?


Answer: algorithm was the first interior point method of linear programming.

Question: What was von Neumann's method known to be the first of?


Answer: 1941

Context: Von Neumann made fundamental contributions to mathematical statistics. In 1941, he derived the exact distribution of the ratio of the mean square of successive differences to the sample variance for independent and identically normally distributed variables. This ratio was applied to the residuals from regression models and is commonly known as the Durbin–Watson statistic for testing the null hypothesis that the errors are serially independent against the alternative that they follow a stationary first order autoregression.

Question: When did von NEumann establish mean square ratio?


Answer: Durbin–Watson statistic

Question: How has mean square ratio been applied?


Answer: alternative that they follow a stationary first order autoregression

Question: what does null hypothesis test against?


Answer: numerical hydrodynamics

Context: Von Neumann made fundamental contributions in exploration of problems in numerical hydrodynamics. For example, with Robert D. Richtmyer he developed an algorithm defining artificial viscosity that improved the understanding of shock waves. A problem was that when computers solved hydrodynamic or aerodynamic problems, they tried to put too many computational grid points at regions of sharp discontinuity (shock waves). The mathematics of artificial viscosity smoothed the shock transition without sacrificing basic physics. Other well known contributions to fluid dynamics included the classic flow solution to blast waves, and the co-discovery of the ZND detonation model of explosives.

Question: The algorithm defining artificial viscosity is a fundamental contribution to what area?


Answer: smoothed the shock transition without sacrificing basic physics

Question: What did the math of artificial viscosity do?


Answer: they tried to put too many computational grid points at regions of sharp discontinuity (shock waves)

Question: What was the problem of computers solving fluid dynamics?


Answer: concept and design of the explosive lenses needed to compress the plutonium core

Context: Von Neumann's principal contribution to the atomic bomb was in the concept and design of the explosive lenses needed to compress the plutonium core of the Fat Man weapon that was later dropped on Nagasaki. While von Neumann did not originate the "implosion" concept, he was one of its most persistent proponents, encouraging its continued development against the instincts of many of his colleagues, who felt such a design to be unworkable. He also eventually came up with the idea of using more powerful shaped charges and less fissionable material to greatly increase the speed of "assembly".

Question: What principal contribution did von Neumann make to atomic bomb?


Answer: he was one of its most persistent proponents, encouraging its continued development

Question: Did von Nemann think that the atomic bomb design was not workable?


Answer: more powerful shaped charges and less fissionable material to greatly increase the speed of "assembly"

Question: What additional ideas did von Neumann contribute to Atomic bomb?


Answer: implosive lens project was greatly expanded

Context: When it turned out that there would not be enough uranium-235 to make more than one bomb, the implosive lens project was greatly expanded and von Neumann's idea was implemented. Implosion was the only method that could be used with the plutonium-239 that was available from the Hanford Site. He established the design of the explosive lenses required, but there remained concerns about "edge effects" and imperfections in the explosives. His calculations showed that implosion would work if it did not depart by more than 5% from spherical symmetry. After a series of failed attempts with models, this was achieved by George Kistiakowsky, and the construction of the Trinity bomb was completed in July 1945.

Question: what change was made when shortage of uranium 235 was apparent?


Answer: not depart by more than 5% from spherical symmetry

Question: What was the tolerance limit for implosion "edge effect"?


Answer: George Kistiakowsky

Question: Who constructed Trinity bomb?


Answer: 1945

Question: In what year was Trinity bomb completed?


Answer: four other scientists and various military personnel

Context: Along with four other scientists and various military personnel, von Neumann was included in the target selection committee responsible for choosing the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as the first targets of the atomic bomb. Von Neumann oversaw computations related to the expected size of the bomb blasts, estimated death tolls, and the distance above the ground at which the bombs should be detonated for optimum shock wave propagation and thus maximum effect. The cultural capital Kyoto, which had been spared the bombing inflicted upon militarily significant cities, was von Neumann's first choice, a selection seconded by Manhattan Project leader General Leslie Groves. However, this target was dismissed by Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson.

Question: What other people worked with von Neumann on target selection?


Answer: oversaw computations

Question: What role did von Neuman play in the selection of targets?


Answer: Kyoto

Question: What was von Neumann's first choice for target city?


Answer: Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson.

Question: Who dismissed von Neuamann's primary target city?


Answer: July 16, 1945

Context: On July 16, 1945, with numerous other Manhattan Project personnel, von Neumann was an eyewitness to the first atomic bomb blast, code named Trinity, conducted as a test of the implosion method device, at the bombing range near Alamogordo Army Airfield, 35 miles (56 km) southeast of Socorro, New Mexico. Based on his observation alone, von Neumann estimated the test had resulted in a blast equivalent to 5 kilotons of TNT (21 TJ) but Enrico Fermi produced a more accurate estimate of 10 kilotons by dropping scraps of torn-up paper as the shock wave passed his location and watching how far they scattered. The actual power of the explosion had been between 20 and 22 kilotons. It was in von Neumann's 1944 papers that the expression "kilotons" appeared for the first time. After the war, Robert Oppenheimer remarked that the physicists involved in the Manhattan project had "known sin". Von Neumann's response was that "sometimes someone confesses a sin in order to take credit for it."

Question: On what day was the first atomic blast?


Answer: Alamogordo Army Airfield,

Question: Where did the first atomic blast test take place?


Answer: between 20 and 22 kilotons

Question: What was the power of the first atomic blast?


Answer: Klaus Fuchs

Context: Von Neumann continued unperturbed in his work and became, along with Edward Teller, one of those who sustained the hydrogen bomb project. He then collaborated with Klaus Fuchs on further development of the bomb, and in 1946 the two filed a secret patent on "Improvement in Methods and Means for Utilizing Nuclear Energy", which outlined a scheme for using a fission bomb to compress fusion fuel to initiate nuclear fusion. The Fuchs–von Neumann patent used radiation implosion, but not in the same way as is used in what became the final hydrogen bomb design, the Teller–Ulam design. Their work was, however, incorporated into the "George" shot of Operation Greenhouse, which was instructive in testing out concepts that went into the final design. The Fuchs–von Neumann work was passed on, by Fuchs, to the Soviet Union as part of his nuclear espionage, but it was not used in the Soviets' own, independent development of the Teller–Ulam design. The historian Jeremy Bernstein has pointed out that ironically, "John von Neumann and Klaus Fuchs, produced a brilliant invention in 1946 that could have changed the whole course of the development of the hydrogen bomb, but was not fully understood until after the bomb had been successfully made."

Question: With whom did von Neumann collaborate for further development of the hydrogen bomb?


Answer: using a fission bomb to compress fusion fuel to initiate nuclear fusion

Question: What improvement did von Neumann see in the nuclear weaponry?


Answer: Soviet Union

Question: What country was afforded access to design of improved nuclear weapon through espionage?


Answer: Weapons Systems Evaluation Group

Context: In 1950, von Neumann became a consultant to the Weapons Systems Evaluation Group (WSEG), whose function was to advise the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the United States Secretary of Defense on the development and use of new technologies. He also became an adviser to the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project (AFSWP), which was responsible for the military aspects on nuclear weapons.Over the following two years, he also became a consultant to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), a member of the influential General Advisory Committee of the Atomic Energy Commission, a consultant to the newly established Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and a member of the Scientific Advisory Group of the United States Air Force.

Question: In 1950 von Neumann became a consultant for what organization?


Answer: Armed Forces Special Weapons Project

Question: What military organization did von NEumann also consult with for military aspect of nuclear weapons?


Answer: General Advisory Committee

Question: What committee did von Neumann serve on within the Atomic Energy Commission?


Answer: 1955

Context: In 1955, von Neumann became a commissioner of the AEC. He accepted this position and used it to further the production of compact hydrogen bombs suitable for Intercontinental ballistic missile delivery. He involved himself in correcting the severe shortage of tritium and lithium 6 needed for these compact weapons, and he argued against settling for the intermediate range missiles that the Army wanted. He was adamant that H-bombs delivered into the heart of enemy territory by an ICBM would be the most effective weapon possible, and that the relative inaccuracy of the missile wouldn't be a problem with an H-bomb. He said the Russians would probably be building a similar weapon system, which turned out to be the case. Despite his disagreement with Oppenheimer over the need for a crash program to develop the hydrogen bomb, he testified on the latter's behalf at the 1954 Oppenheimer security hearing, at which he asserted that Oppenheimer was loyal, and praised him for his helpfulness once the program went ahead.

Question: In what year did von Neumann become commissioner of the AEC?


Answer: Intercontinental ballistic missile delivery

Question: What were compact hydrogen bombs useful for?


Answer: relative inaccuracy of the missile

Question: What was the concern with longer range ICBM with Hbomb?


Answer: Oppenheimer

Question: Von Neumann testified at whose hearing about loyalty and help?


Answer: decide on the feasibility of building an ICBM large enough to carry a thermonuclear weapon

Context: Shortly before his death, when he was already quite ill, von Neumann headed the United States government's top secret ICBM committee, and it would sometimes meet in his home. Its purpose was to decide on the feasibility of building an ICBM large enough to carry a thermonuclear weapon. Von Neumann had long argued that while the technical obstacles were sizable, they could be overcome in time. The SM-65 Atlas passed its first fully functional test in 1959, two years after his death. The feasibility of an ICBM owed as much to improved, smaller warheads as it did to developments in rocketry, and his understanding of the former made his advice invaluable.

Question: What was the purpose of top secret ICBM committee?


Answer: while the technical obstacles were sizable, they could be overcome in time

Question: What argument did von Neumann make about ICBMs?


Answer: 1959

Question: In what year did SM-65 Atlas pass its first fully functional test?


Answer: mutual assured destruction

Context: Von Neumann is credited with the equilibrium strategy of mutual assured destruction, providing the deliberately humorous acronym, MAD. (Other humorous acronyms coined by von Neumann include his computer, the Mathematical Analyzer, Numerical Integrator, and Computer—or MANIAC). He also "moved heaven and earth" to bring MAD about. His goal was to quickly develop ICBMs and the compact hydrogen bombs that they could deliver to the USSR, and he knew the Soviets were doing similar work because the CIA interviewed German rocket scientists who were allowed to return to Germany, and von Neumann had planted a dozen technical people in the CIA. The Russians believed that bombers would soon be vulnerable, and they shared von Neumann's view that an H-bomb in an ICBM was the ne plus ultra of weapons, and they believed that whoever had superiority in these weapons would take over the world, without necessarily using them. He was afraid of a "missile gap" and took several more steps to achieve his goal of keeping up with the Soviets:

Question: What was MAD?


Answer: quickly develop ICBMs and the compact hydrogen bombs that they could deliver to the USSR

Question: What was the goal of MAD?


Answer: Russians believed that bombers would soon be vulnerable, and they shared von Neumann's view that an H-bomb in an ICBM was the ne plus ultra of weapons

Question: What were Russians opinions of future weaponry?


Answer: keeping up with the Soviets

Question: What was the concern of a missile gap?


Answer: felt that, if freedom and civilization were to survive, it would have to be because the US would triumph over totalitarianism

Context: Von Neumann entered government service (Manhattan Project) primarily because he felt that, if freedom and civilization were to survive, it would have to be because the US would triumph over totalitarianism from Nazism, Fascism and Soviet Communism. During a Senate committee hearing he described his political ideology as "violently anti-communist, and much more militaristic than the norm". He was quoted in 1950 remarking, "If you say why not bomb [the Soviets] tomorrow, I say, why not today? If you say today at five o'clock, I say why not one o'clock?"

Question: Why did von Neumann join government work?


Answer: violently anti-communist, and much more militaristic than the norm

Question: How did von Neumaan describe his political ideology?


Answer: Manhattan Project

Question: What was the project that von Neumann first participated in government?


Answer: Von Neumann

Context: Von Neumann was a founding figure in computing. Donald Knuth cites von Neumann as the inventor, in 1945, of the merge sort algorithm, in which the first and second halves of an array are each sorted recursively and then merged. Von Neumann wrote the sorting program for the EDVAC in ink, being 23 pages long; traces can still be seen on the first page of the phrase "TOP SECRET", which was written in pencil and later erased. He also worked on the philosophy of artificial intelligence with Alan Turing when the latter visited Princeton in the 1930s.

Question: Who was the inventor of the merge-sort algorithm?


Answer: Alan Turing

Question: With whom did von Neumann work on the philosophy of artificial intelligence?


Answer: the first and second halves of an array are each sorted recursively and then merged

Question: What does a merge sort algorithm do?


Answer: von Neumann's digital computers

Context: Von Neumann's hydrogen bomb work was played out in the realm of computing, where he and Stanislaw Ulam developed simulations on von Neumann's digital computers for the hydrodynamic computations. During this time he contributed to the development of the Monte Carlo method, which allowed solutions to complicated problems to be approximated using random numbers. His algorithm for simulating a fair coin with a biased coin is used in the "software whitening" stage of some hardware random number generators. Because using lists of "truly" random numbers was extremely slow, von Neumann developed a form of making pseudorandom numbers, using the middle-square method. Though this method has been criticized as crude, von Neumann was aware of this: he justified it as being faster than any other method at his disposal, and also noted that when it went awry it did so obviously, unlike methods which could be subtly incorrect. "Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random digits is, of course, in a state of sin."

Question: Where were the computations for hydrogen bomb worked out?


Answer: allowed solutions to complicated problems to be approximated using random numbers

Question: What was the Monte Carlo method?


Answer: pseudorandom numbers

Question: Due to slow use of random numbers what was developed?


Answer: von Neumann wrote an incomplete First Draft of a Report

Context: While consulting for the Moore School of Electrical Engineering at the University of Pennsylvania on the EDVAC project, von Neumann wrote an incomplete First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC. The paper, whose premature distribution nullified the patent claims of EDVAC designers J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly, described a computer architecture in which the data and the program are both stored in the computer's memory in the same address space. This architecture is to this day the basis of modern computer design, unlike the earliest computers that were "programmed" using a separate memory device such as a paper tape or plugboard. Although the single-memory, stored program architecture is commonly called von Neumann architecture as a result of von Neumann's paper, the architecture's description was based on the work of J. Presper Eckert and John William Mauchly, inventors of the ENIAC computer at the University of Pennsylvania.

Question: What nullified patent claims of EDVAC designers?


Answer: architecture is to this day the basis of modern computer design,

Question: What was the significance of EDVAC?


Answer: University of Pennsylvania

Question: Where was ENIAC located?


Answer: new ENIAC ran at one-sixth the speed

Context: John von Neumann also consulted for the ENIAC project. The electronics of the new ENIAC ran at one-sixth the speed, but this in no way degraded the ENIAC's performance, since it was still entirely I/O bound. Complicated programs could be developed and debugged in days rather than the weeks required for plugboarding the old ENIAC. Some of von Neumann's early computer programs have been preserved. The next computer that von Neumann designed was the IAS machine at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. He arranged its financing, and the components were designed and built at the RCA Research Laboratory nearby. John von Neumann recommended that the IBM 701, nicknamed the defense computer include a magnetic drum. It was a faster version of the IAS machine and formed the basis for the commercially successful IBM 704.

Question: What was the speed difference with new ENIAC?


Answer: programs could be developed and debugged in days rather than the weeks

Question: What were advantages for programming new ENIAC?


Answer: RCA Research Laboratory

Question: After the design of IAS, who built the computer?


Answer: 1953

Context: Stochastic computing was first introduced in a pioneering paper by von Neumann in 1953. However, the theory could not be implemented until advances in computing of the 1960s. He also created the field of cellular automata without the aid of computers, constructing the first self-replicating automata with pencil and graph paper. The concept of a universal constructor was fleshed out in his posthumous work Theory of Self Reproducing Automata. Von Neumann proved that the most effective way of performing large-scale mining operations such as mining an entire moon or asteroid belt would be by using self-replicating spacecraft, taking advantage of their exponential growth. His rigorous mathematical analysis of the structure of self-replication (of the semiotic relationship between constructor, description and that which is constructed), preceded the discovery of the structure of DNA. Beginning in 1949, von Neumann's design for a self-reproducing computer program is considered the world's first computer virus, and he is considered to be the theoretical father of computer virology.

Question: When was stochastic computing introduced?


Answer: advances in computing of the 1960s.

Question: How long before stochastic computing could be implemented?


Answer: 1949

Question: When did von NEumann develop first self reproducing computer program?


Answer: computer virus

Question: What is another name for the first self reproducing computer program?


Answer: ENIAC

Context: Von Neumann's team performed the world's first numerical weather forecasts on the ENIAC computer; von Neumann published the paper Numerical Integration of the Barotropic Vorticity Equation in 1950. Von Neumann's interest in weather systems and meteorological prediction led him to propose manipulating the environment by spreading colorants on the polar ice caps to enhance absorption of solar radiation (by reducing the albedo). thereby inducing global warming. Noting that the Earth was only 6 °F (3.3 °C) colder during the last glacial period, he noted that the burning of coal and oil "a general warming of the Earth by about one degree Fahrenheit."

Question: On what computer was the first numerical weather forecast produced?


Answer: 1950

Question: In what year did von Neumann publish the paper Numerical Integration of the Barotropic Vorticity Equation


Answer: 6 °F (3.3 °C) colder

Question: How much colder was world in last glacial age?


Answer: stunned other mathematicians

Context: Von Neumann's ability to instantaneously perform complex operations in his head stunned other mathematicians. Eugene Wigner wrote that, seeing von Neumann's mind at work, "one had the impression of a perfect instrument whose gears were machined to mesh accurately to a thousandth of an inch." Paul Halmos states that "von Neumann's speed was awe-inspiring." Israel Halperin said: "Keeping up with him was ... impossible. The feeling was you were on a tricycle chasing a racing car." Edward Teller wrote that von Neumann effortlessly outdid anybody he ever met, and said "I never could keep up with him". Teller also said "von Neumann would carry on a conversation with my 3-year-old son, and the two of them would talk as equals, and I sometimes wondered if he used the same principle when he talked to the rest of us. Most people avoid thinking if they can, some of us are addicted to thinking, but von Neumann actually enjoyed thinking, maybe even to the exclusion of everything else."

Question: How quickly was von Neumann able to complete math in his head?


Answer: Paul Halmos states that "von Neumann's speed was awe-inspiring."

Question: Were other mathematicians amazed by von Neumann?


Answer: Neumann actually enjoyed thinking, maybe even to the exclusion of everything else.

Question: Did von Neumann enjoy thinking?


Answer: "fastest mind I ever met",

Context: Lothar Wolfgang Nordheim described von Neumann as the "fastest mind I ever met", and Jacob Bronowski wrote "He was the cleverest man I ever knew, without exception. He was a genius." George Pólya, whose lectures at ETH Zürich von Neumann attended as a student, said "Johnny was the only student I was ever afraid of. If in the course of a lecture I stated an unsolved problem, the chances were he'd come to me at the end of the lecture with the complete solution scribbled on a slip of paper." Halmos recounts a story told by Nicholas Metropolis, concerning the speed of von Neumann's calculations, when somebody asked von Neumann to solve the famous fly puzzle:

Question: How did Lothar Wolfgang Nordheim describe von Neumann?


Answer: He was the cleverest man I ever knew, without exception. He was a genius.

Question: What did Jacob Bronowski think of von Neumann?


Answer: Johnny was the only student I was ever afraid of.

Question: What did Lecturer Polya think about von Nuemann?


Answer: One of his remarkable abilities was his power of absolute recall.

Context: Herman Goldstine wrote: "One of his remarkable abilities was his power of absolute recall. As far as I could tell, von Neumann was able on once reading a book or article to quote it back verbatim; moreover, he could do it years later without hesitation. He could also translate it at no diminution in speed from its original language into English. On one occasion I tested his ability by asking him to tell me how A Tale of Two Cities started. Whereupon, without any pause, he immediately began to recite the first chapter and continued until asked to stop after about ten or fifteen minutes." Ulam noted that von Neumann's way of thinking might not be visual, but more of an aural one.

Question: What did Herman Goldstone write about von NEumann?


Answer: he immediately began to recite the first chapter and continued until asked to stop after about ten or fifteen minutes.

Question: Could von Neumann recall written text much later?


Answer: von Neumann's way of thinking might not be visual, but more of an aural one.

Question: What did Ulam think of von Nuemann's cognitive ability?


Answer: I have sometimes wondered whether a brain like von Neumann's does not indicate a species superior to that of man

Context: "I have sometimes wondered whether a brain like von Neumann's does not indicate a species superior to that of man", said Nobel Laureate Hans Bethe of Cornell University. "It seems fair to say that if the influence of a scientist is interpreted broadly enough to include impact on fields beyond science proper, then John von Neumann was probably the most influential mathematician who ever lived," wrote Miklós Rédei in "Selected Letters." James Glimm wrote: "he is regarded as one of the giants of modern mathematics". The mathematician Jean Dieudonné called von Neumann "the last of the great mathematicians", while Peter Lax described him as possessing the "most scintillating intellect of this century".

Question: What did Nobel Laureate Hans Bethe think of von NEumann's ability?


Answer: he is regarded as one of the giants of modern mathematics

Question: What did James Glimm have to say about von Nuemann?


Answer: most scintillating intellect of this century

Question: What description did Peter Lax use for von Neumann?


Answer: 1955

Context: In 1955, von Neumann was diagnosed with what was either bone or pancreatic cancer. His mother, Margaret von Neumann, was diagnosed with cancer in 1956 and died within two weeks. John had eighteen months from diagnosis till death. In this period von Neumann returned to the Roman Catholic faith that had also been significant to his mother after the family's conversion in 1929–1930. John had earlier said to his mother, "There is probably a God. Many things are easier to explain if there is than if there isn't." Von Neumann held on to his exemplary knowledge of Latin and quoted to a deathbed visitor the declamation "Judex ergo cum sedebit," and ends "Quid sum miser tunc dicturus? Quem patronum rogaturus, Cum vix iustus sit securus?" (When the judge His seat hath taken ... What shall wretched I then plead? Who for me shall intercede when the righteous scarce is freed?)

Question: In what year was von Neumann diagnosed with cancer?


Answer: died within two weeks

Question: From when his mother was diagnosed with cancer, how long did she live?


Answer: eighteen months

Question: How long did von Neumann survive with cancer?


Answer: Father Strittmatter

Context: He invited a Roman Catholic priest, Father Anselm Strittmatter, O.S.B., to visit him for consultation. Von Neumann reportedly said in explanation that Pascal had a point, referring to Pascal's Wager. Father Strittmatter administered the last sacraments to him. Some of von Neumann's friends (such as Abraham Pais and Oskar Morgenstern) said they had always believed him to be "completely agnostic." "Of this deathbed conversion, Morgenstern told Heims, "He was of course completely agnostic all his life, and then he suddenly turned Catholic—it doesn't agree with anything whatsoever in his attitude, outlook and thinking when he was healthy." Father Strittmatter recalled that von Neumann did not receive much peace or comfort from it, as he still remained terrified of death.

Question: Who administered the last sacrament to von Neumann?


Answer: did not receive much peace or comfort from it, as he still remained terrified of death

Question: Did the last sacrament ease von Neumann?


Answer: he suddenly turned Catholic—it doesn't agree with anything whatsoever in his attitude, outlook and thinking when he was healthy

Question: Was there conflict of faith and beliefs at the end of von NEumann's life?


Answer: always believed him to be "completely agnostic."

Question: What did Oskar Morgenstern feel about von Neumann's beliefs?


Answer: Romania, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Finland

Context: The stated clauses of the Nazi-Soviet non-aggression pact were a guarantee of non-belligerence by each party towards the other, and a written commitment that neither party would ally itself to, or aid, an enemy of the other party. In addition to stipulations of non-aggression, the treaty included a secret protocol that divided territories of Romania, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Finland into German and Soviet "spheres of influence", anticipating potential "territorial and political rearrangements" of these countries. Thereafter, Germany invaded Poland on 1 September 1939. After the Soviet–Japanese ceasefire agreement took effect on 16 September, Stalin ordered his own invasion of Poland on 17 September. Part of southeastern (Karelia) and Salla region in Finland were annexed by the Soviet Union after the Winter War. This was followed by Soviet annexations of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and parts of Romania (Bessarabia, Northern Bukovina, and the Hertza region). Concern about ethnic Ukrainians and Belarusians had been proffered as justification for the Soviet invasion of Poland. Stalin's invasion of Bukovina in 1940 violated the pact, as it went beyond the Soviet sphere of influence agreed with the Axis.

Question: The agreement between the Nazis and the Soviets split what countries up?


Answer: Soviet

Question: Who invaded Poland after the Nazi’s?


Answer: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and parts of Romania

Question: Which countries were taken over by the Soviets?


Answer: Stalin

Question: Who broke the agreement with the invasion of Bukovina?


Answer: Finland

Question: Salla is located in what country?


Answer: Polish state

Context: Of the territories of Poland annexed by the Soviet Union between 1939 and 1940, the region around Białystok and a minor part of Galicia east of the San river around Przemyśl were returned to the Polish state at the end of World War II. Of all other territories annexed by the USSR in 1939–40, the ones detached from Finland (Karelia, Petsamo), Estonia (Ingrian area and Petseri County) and Latvia (Abrene) remained part of the Russian Federation, the successor state of the Soviet Union, after 1991. Northern Bukovina, Southern Bessarabia and Hertza remain part of Ukraine.

Question: The regions of Białystok, Galicia and Przemyśl were returned to what country after world war II?


Answer: (Karelia, Petsamo), Estonia (Ingrian area and Petseri County) and Latvia (Abrene) remained part of the Russian Federation

Question: What regions remained part of the Soviet Union?


Answer: Northern Bukovina, Southern Bessarabia and Hertza

Question: After World War II, what regions remain part of Ukraine?


Answer: Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.

Context: The outcome of the First World War was disastrous for both the German Reich and the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic. During the war, the Bolsheviks struggled for survival, and Vladimir Lenin recognised the independence of Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. Moreover, facing a German military advance, Lenin and Trotsky were forced to enter into the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, which ceded massive western Russian territories to the German Empire. After Germany's collapse, a multinational Allied-led army intervened in the Russian Civil War (1917–22).

Question: Lenin acknowledged the independence of which countries?


Answer: Treaty of Brest-Litovsk

Question: What agreement gave Germany many regions of Russia in the first world war?


Answer: 1917–22

Question: When did the russian civil war take place?


Answer: ethnic Jews

Context: At the beginning of the 1930s, the Nazi Party's rise to power increased tensions between Germany and the Soviet Union along with other countries with ethnic Slavs, who were considered "Untermenschen" (inferior) according to Nazi racial ideology. Moreover, the anti-Semitic Nazis associated ethnic Jews with both communism and financial capitalism, both of which they opposed. Consequently, Nazi theory held that Slavs in the Soviet Union were being ruled by "Jewish Bolshevik" masters. In 1934, Hitler himself had spoken of an inescapable battle against both Pan-Slavism and Neo-Slavism, the victory in which would lead to "permanent mastery of the world", though he stated that they would "walk part of the road with the Russians, if that will help us." The resulting manifestation of German anti-Bolshevism and an increase in Soviet foreign debts caused German–Soviet trade to dramatically decline.[b] Imports of Soviet goods to Germany fell to 223 million Reichsmarks in 1934 as the more isolationist Stalinist regime asserted power and the abandonment of post–World War I Treaty of Versailles military controls decreased Germany's reliance on Soviet imports.[clarification needed]

Question: Who was to blame for communism and capitalism?


Answer: Treaty of Versailles

Question: What reduced Germany’s need for Soviet goods?


Answer: Nazi Party

Question: Which political group created problems between the Soviet and German governments?


Answer: UK and France

Context: Hitler's fierce anti-Soviet rhetoric was one of the reasons why the UK and France decided that Soviet participation in the 1938 Munich Conference regarding Czechoslovakia would be both dangerous and useless. The Munich Agreement that followed marked a partial German annexation of Czechoslovakia in late 1938 followed by its complete dissolution in March 1939, which as part of the appeasement of Germany conducted by Chamberlain's and Daladier's cabinets. This policy immediately raised the question of whether the Soviet Union could avoid being next on Hitler's list. The Soviet leadership believed that the West wanted to encourage German aggression in the East and that France and Britain might stay neutral in a war initiated by Germany, hoping that the warring states would wear each other out and put an end to both the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany.

Question: What countries prevented the Soviets from joining the Munich Conference?


Answer: Chamberlain

Question: Who was the English politician who appeased Germany with the take over of Czechoslovakia


Answer: put an end to both the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany

Question: The soviets suspected that Nazi-Soviet conflicts would result in what?


Answer: British blockade

Context: For Germany, because an autarkic economic approach or an alliance with Britain were impossible, closer relations with the Soviet Union to obtain raw materials became necessary, if not just for economic reasons alone. Moreover, an expected British blockade in the event of war would create massive shortages for Germany in a number of key raw materials. After the Munich agreement, the resulting increase in German military supply needs and Soviet demands for military machinery, talks between the two countries occurred from late 1938 to March 1939. The third Soviet Five Year Plan required new infusions of technology and industrial equipment.[clarification needed] German war planners had estimated serious shortfalls of raw materials if Germany entered a war without Soviet supply.

Question: During conflict, what would prevent transport of materials?


Answer: military machinery

Question: Between german and the soviet union which country needed military machinery?


Answer: Germany

Question: Who believed they needed a supply line from the Soviet Union to sustain another war?


Answer: capitalist encirclements

Context: The Soviet Union, which feared Western powers and the possibility of "capitalist encirclements", had little faith either that war could be avoided, or faith in the Polish army, and wanted nothing less than an ironclad military alliance with France and Britain that would provide a guaranteed support for a two-pronged attack on Germany; thus, Stalin's adherence to the collective security line was purely conditional. Britain and France believed that war could still be avoided, and that the Soviet Union, weakened by the Great Purge, could not be a main military participant, a point that many military sources were at variance with, especially Soviet victories over the Japanese Kwantung army on the Manchurian frontier. France was more anxious to find an agreement with the USSR than was Britain; as a continental power, it was more willing to make concessions, more fearful of the dangers of an agreement between the USSR and Germany. These contrasting attitudes partly explain why the USSR has often been charged with playing a double game in 1939: carrying on open negotiations for an alliance with Britain and France while secretly considering propositions from Germany.

Question: Why did the Soviet government fear the governments of France and Britain?


Answer: Great Purge

Question: Why did western power believe that the soviet government wouldn’t partake in another world war?


Answer: Soviet Union

Question: What country was at war with Japan in China prior to World War II?


Answer: France

Question: Who was afraid of a pact between Germany and the Soviet governments?


Answer: Britain

Context: By the end of May, drafts were formally presented. In mid-June, the main Tripartite negotiations started. The discussion was focused on potential guarantees to central and east European countries should a German aggression arise. The USSR proposed to consider that a political turn towards Germany by the Baltic states would constitute an "indirect aggression" towards the Soviet Union. Britain opposed such proposals, because they feared the Soviets' proposed language could justify a Soviet intervention in Finland and the Baltic states, or push those countries to seek closer relations with Germany. The discussion about a definition of "indirect aggression" became one of the sticking points between the parties, and by mid-July, the tripartite political negotiations effectively stalled, while the parties agreed to start negotiations on a military agreement, which the Soviets insisted must be entered into simultaneously with any political agreement.

Question: Who predicted soviet aggression in the Baltic region?


Answer: mid-June

Question: What month did the Tripartite discussions begin between Britain, USSR and France?


Answer: the Soviets

Question: Which country is blamed for the Tripartite discussion to stagnate and fail?


Answer: Maxim Litvinov

Context: From April–July, Soviet and German officials made statements regarding the potential for the beginning of political negotiations, while no actual negotiations took place during that time period. The ensuing discussion of a potential political deal between Germany and the Soviet Union had to be channeled into the framework of economic negotiations between the two countries, because close military and diplomatic connections, as was the case before the mid-1930s, had afterward been largely severed. In May, Stalin replaced his Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov, who was regarded as pro-western and who was also Jewish, with Vyacheslav Molotov, allowing the Soviet Union more latitude in discussions with more parties, not only with Britain and France.

Question: Which Soviet Foreign Minister lost his job because of his favorable attitude towards the west?


Answer: Soviet and German

Question: Which two countries positioned themselves to broker a deal returning to a pre-1930’s treaty with each other?


Answer: Germany and the Soviet Union

Question: Which two countries positioned themselves to broker an new trade agreement?


Answer: Moscow

Context: At the same time, British, French, and Soviet negotiators scheduled three-party talks on military matters to occur in Moscow in August 1939, aiming to define what the agreement would specify should be the reaction of the three powers to a German attack. The tripartite military talks, started in mid-August, hit a sticking point regarding the passage of Soviet troops through Poland if Germans attacked, and the parties waited as British and French officials overseas pressured Polish officials to agree to such terms. Polish officials refused to allow Soviet troops into Polish territory if Germany attacked; as Polish foreign minister Józef Beck pointed out, they feared that once the Red Army entered their territories, it might never leave.

Question: In what city did the tripartite military talks occur during the month of August?


Answer: once the Red Army entered their territories, it might never leave.

Question: Why did Poland deny the proposal of the Soviet Union protecting them from a German Attack?


Answer: Poland

Question: Who did not want their country protected by the Soviet military?


Answer: Vistula river

Context: On August 19, the 1939 German–Soviet Commercial Agreement was finally signed. On 21 August, the Soviets suspended Tripartite military talks, citing other reasons. That same day, Stalin received assurance that Germany would approve secret protocols to the proposed non-aggression pact that would place half of Poland (border along the Vistula river), Latvia, Estonia, Finland, and Bessarabia in the Soviets' sphere of influence. That night, Stalin replied that the Soviets were willing to sign the pact and that he would receive Ribbentrop on 23 August.

Question: What was the German-Soviet dividing line in regards to annexing Poland?


Answer: 2

Question: How many days after the German-Soviet agreement were the Tripartite discussions ceased?


Answer: Latvia, Estonia, Finland, and Bessarabia

Question: What other countries did the Soviet government agree to annex through the agreement with Germany?


Answer: Ribbentrop

Context: On 22 August, one day after the talks broke down with France and Britain, Moscow revealed that Ribbentrop would visit Stalin the next day. This happened while the Soviets were still negotiating with the British and French missions in Moscow. With the Western nations unwilling to accede to Soviet demands, Stalin instead entered a secret Nazi–Soviet pact. On 24 August a 10-year non-aggression pact was signed with provisions that included: consultation, arbitration if either party disagreed, neutrality if either went to war against a third power, no membership of a group "which is directly or indirectly aimed at the other".

Question: Which Foreign Minister would agree to meet with Stalin on to sign a secret agreement?


Answer: 10-year

Question: How long was the secret agreement between Germany and the Soviets?


Answer: either went to war against a third power

Question: Part of the secret agreement between the Germans and the Soviets included a neutral diplomatic approach when?


Answer: Lithuania

Context: Most notably, there was also a secret protocol to the pact, revealed only after Germany's defeat in 1945, although hints about its provisions were leaked much earlier, e.g., to influence Lithuania. According to said protocol Romania, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Finland were divided into German and Soviet "spheres of influence". In the north, Finland, Estonia and Latvia were assigned to the Soviet sphere. Poland was to be partitioned in the event of its "political rearrangement"—the areas east of the Pisa, Narev, Vistula and San rivers going to the Soviet Union while Germany would occupy the west. Lithuania, adjacent to East Prussia, would be in the German sphere of influence, although a second secret protocol agreed to in September 1939 reassigned the majority of Lithuania to the USSR. According to the secret protocol, Lithuania would be granted the city of Vilnius – its historical capital, which was under Polish control during the inter-war period. Another clause of the treaty was that Germany would not interfere with the Soviet Union's actions towards Bessarabia, then part of Romania; as the result, Bessarabia was joined to the Moldovan ASSR, and become the Moldovan SSR under control of Moscow.

Question: What country held the city Vilnius prior to the inter-war period?


Answer: Lithuania

Question: What country would reclaim the city of Vilnius?


Answer: Pisa, Narev, Vistula and San rivers

Question: What rivers would the soviet union claim as their own during the invasion of poland?


Answer: German

Question: Who would claim Lithuania under their political umbrella?


Answer: Soviet Union

Question: Bessarabia eventually became under the control of which country?