Question: How do you like the texture?

I bought this case to protect my iPad 3. Overall, it appears to be a good case, though I have a number of quibbles with it. I have had the case only a few days, so these are initial impressions.Good stuff: The case fits the iPad 3 very well. It is a bit snug, perhaps; I have seen some reviewers complain about this, but I consider it to be an advantage. The auto-on-off switch, activated by a magnet when the case is closed, works just fine. My primary concern was that the case would hold the iPad securely, without slipping, especially when being used as a stand in the upright position. The case I bought for my original iPad failed in this regard. The new case, however, uses a velcro closure that feels very secure. It does not slide around in the case at all.Neutral stuff: The buttons on the side of the unit are not easy to reach, but that is more a function of the design of the iPad rather than the case. Exposing the buttons would require exposing more of the iPad, which would not be a good design decision (IMO). Be advised that while the product literature suggests that this case is made of leather, it isn't. I knew that when I purchased it, so that wasn't an issue for me. However, if anyone is led to believe that this is a leather case, be assured: it isn't. The case features a hand strap on the back of the flap, for use when the flap is folded around. I have not found a good way to use this flap, so I consider it a neutral feature. (YMMV) Finally, I have not used the stylus loop, and I don't plan to, so I have nothing to say in that regard (except that it successfully stays out of the way if you don't care to use it).Bad stuff: This case is heavy. I was surprised at how heavy it is. With the case, it gives up any gains in weight that it had over the original iPad; in fact, I believe the iPad 3 with this case weighs more than my iPad 1 in its case. This is only an issue when I am supporting the iPad in my hands, but it is noticeable at those times--and annoying. Also, this case smells. It has a chemical, fake-leather smell that is unpleasant and sticks to your hands. I expect that the smell will fade over time (I have used fake leather steering wheel covers in my car, and they have the same problem), but for now, it's yet another annoyance. Finally--and this is little more than a quibble--the angles at which the iPad sits when the case is used as a stand are not quite to my liking. The angle in the upright position is too steep, and the angle in the leaned-back position is too shallow.Summary: I gave this case four stars, and I would recommend it to a friend. Of course, I would inform him of the disadvantages that I have noted in the review. However, they do not outweigh the advantages of the case (again, IMO).

Answer: good case

I bought this case to protect my iPad 3. <hl> Overall, it appears to be a good case , though I have a number of quibbles with it. <hl> I have had the case only a few days, so these are initial impressions. Good stuff: The case fits the iPad 3 very well. It is a bit snug, perhaps; I have seen some reviewers complain about this, but I consider it to be an advantage. The auto-on-off switch, activated by a magnet when the case is closed, works just fine. My primary concern was that the case would hold the iPad securely, without slipping, especially when being used as a stand in the upright position. The case I bought for my original iPad failed in this regard. The new case, however, uses a velcro closure that feels very secure. It does not slide around in the case at all. Neutral stuff: The buttons on the side of the unit are not easy to reach, but that is more a function of the design of the iPad rather than the case. Exposing the buttons would require exposing more of the iPad, which would not be a good design decision (IMO). Be advised that while the product literature suggests that this case is made of leather, it isn't. I knew that when I purchased it, so that wasn't an issue for me. However, if anyone is led to believe that this is a leather case, be assured: it isn't. The case features a hand strap on the back of the flap, for use when the flap is folded around. I have not found a good way to use this flap, so I consider it a neutral feature. (YMMV) Finally, I have not used the stylus loop, and I don't plan to, so I have nothing to say in that regard (except that it successfully stays out of the way if you don't care to use it).Bad stuff: This case is heavy. I was surprised at how heavy it is. With the case, it gives up any gains in weight that it had over the original iPad; in fact, I believe the iPad 3 with this case weighs more than my iPad 1 in its case. This is only an issue when I am supporting the iPad in my hands, but it is noticeable at those times--and annoying. Also, this case smells. It has a chemical, fake-leather smell that is unpleasant and sticks to your hands. I expect that the smell will fade over time (I have used fake leather steering wheel covers in my car, and they have the same problem), but for now, it's yet another annoyance. Finally--and this is little more than a quibble--the angles at which the iPad sits when the case is used as a stand are not quite to my liking. The angle in the upright position is too steep, and the angle in the leaned-back position is too shallow. Summary: I gave this case four stars, and I would recommend it to a friend. Of course, I would inform him of the disadvantages that I have noted in the review. However, they do not outweigh the advantages of the case (again, IMO).

I bought this case to protect my iPad 3. Overall, it appears to be a <hl> good case <hl>, though I have a number of quibbles with it. I have had the case only a few days, so these are initial impressions.Good stuff: The case fits the iPad 3 very well. It is a bit snug, perhaps; I have seen some reviewers complain about this, but I consider it to be an advantage. The auto-on-off switch, activated by a magnet when the case is closed, works just fine. My primary concern was that the case would hold the iPad securely, without slipping, especially when being used as a stand in the upright position. The case I bought for my original iPad failed in this regard. The new case, however, uses a velcro closure that feels very secure. It does not slide around in the case at all.Neutral stuff: The buttons on the side of the unit are not easy to reach, but that is more a function of the design of the iPad rather than the case. Exposing the buttons would require exposing more of the iPad, which would not be a good design decision (IMO). Be advised that while the product literature suggests that this case is made of leather, it isn't. I knew that when I purchased it, so that wasn't an issue for me. However, if anyone is led to believe that this is a leather case, be assured: it isn't. The case features a hand strap on the back of the flap, for use when the flap is folded around. I have not found a good way to use this flap, so I consider it a neutral feature. (YMMV) Finally, I have not used the stylus loop, and I don't plan to, so I have nothing to say in that regard (except that it successfully stays out of the way if you don't care to use it).Bad stuff: This case is heavy. I was surprised at how heavy it is. With the case, it gives up any gains in weight that it had over the original iPad; in fact, I believe the iPad 3 with this case weighs more than my iPad 1 in its case. This is only an issue when I am supporting the iPad in my hands, but it is noticeable at those times--and annoying. Also, this case smells. It has a chemical, fake-leather smell that is unpleasant and sticks to your hands. I expect that the smell will fade over time (I have used fake leather steering wheel covers in my car, and they have the same problem), but for now, it's yet another annoyance. Finally--and this is little more than a quibble--the angles at which the iPad sits when the case is used as a stand are not quite to my liking. The angle in the upright position is too steep, and the angle in the leaned-back position is too shallow.Summary: I gave this case four stars, and I would recommend it to a friend. Of course, I would inform him of the disadvantages that I have noted in the review. However, they do not outweigh the advantages of the case (again, IMO).

Overall, it appears to be a <hl> good case <hl> , though I have a number of quibbles with it.


Question: How is the camera?

I was always skeptical of these cards, but they work fantastic. Don't let the small GB size scare you. The "infinite" setting on these work great. Once the file is uploaded, and the card is full, it just deletes it from the card. It seems to upload pretty fast, connects well with the Ubiquity mesh network.One note, MAKE SURE your camera supports this! Check the Eye-Fi website, and your cameras manual! If there's any issues with the card, it'll be noted in the Eye-Fi website.

Answer: setting on these work great

I was always skeptical of these cards, but they work fantastic. Don't let the small GB size scare you. <hl> The "infinite" setting on these work great . <hl> Once the file is uploaded, and the card is full, it just deletes it from the card. It seems to upload pretty fast, connects well with the Ubiquity mesh network. One note, MAKE SURE your camera supports this! Check the Eye-Fi website, and your cameras manual! If there's any issues with the card, it'll be noted in the Eye-Fi website.

I was always skeptical of these cards, but they work fantastic. Don't let the small GB size scare you. The "infinite" <hl> setting on these work great <hl>. Once the file is uploaded, and the card is full, it just deletes it from the card. It seems to upload pretty fast, connects well with the Ubiquity mesh network.One note, MAKE SURE your camera supports this! Check the Eye-Fi website, and your cameras manual! If there's any issues with the card, it'll be noted in the Eye-Fi website.

The "infinite" <hl> setting on these work great <hl> .


Question: How low is the cost?

I'm very happy with this item. The capacity is quite large, the price was reasonable, and it works very well.

Answer: the price was reasonable

I'm very happy with this item. <hl> The capacity is quite large, the price was reasonable , and it works very well. <hl>

I'm very happy with this item. The capacity is quite large, <hl> the price was reasonable <hl>, and it works very well.

The capacity is quite large, <hl> the price was reasonable <hl> , and it works very well.


Question: How is the detail?

Sources: iPhone5 with PA2V2/FiiO E07k/Decware Zen Head amps using the LOD, various computers using the Microstreamer/Beyer A200p/v-moda Verza DAC/amps.Review notes: My first impressions of the sound of the SRH440 are based on direct comparisons to other headphones - the v-moda M80 and M100, the Beyerdynamic DT1350 and T51p, the FAD Pandora IV and VI, and notes I've accumulated from many prior reviews. I describe how I relate to the SRH440 (i.e. my personal tastes and how I use the headphone) only after covering all of the objective issues.Summary of sound: It's no coincidence that the SRH440 has such a good soundstage and sense of openness, since those properties are highly dependent on a neutral frequency response that's free of peaks, recesses, and colorations which derive mainly from undamped resonances.My first impression of the SRH440 is neutral sound. But it's much better than that. In my 80-odd headphone reviews, I've used expressions like "fairly neutral" or "basically neutral" etc., but the number of those that I'd play with no EQ whatever were very few: B&W; P7, Beyerdynamic Custom One Pro, FAD Pandora VI, Mad Dog, Sennheiser IE800, and the Shure SRH1840. Compared to those six, the SRH440 gets close to the Mad Dog and the IE800, and has a better signature I think than the other four. In the case of the P7 and Pandora VI, their responses are slightly more 'V'-shaped, but still fine for most genres as is. The Custom One Pro and the SRH1840 are a bit more bland, but also fine for most music genres. The SRH440's (understandable) limitation is its ultimate resolution - the most expensive headphones I've listed here have a subtly clearer sound that's noticeable in direct comparisons, but when the SRH440 is heard on its own, I doubt that very many users would hear the sound as any less than perfect.Some concerns I have with low-cost headphones are inconsistencies in matching the sound between the left and right drivers, and matching the sound between different production samples of the same headphone. When there are any such inconsistencies, a customer may experience a very different sound than what they were expecting based on reviews they've read. Although the SRH440 is only $99 USD currently, every indication I have is for a high quality well-made product. The limitations I notice most compared to the more expensive headphones are the fit and finish - the finish is plain and plastic, but elegant in its simplicity. The earcup fit doesn't feel as though it's making a good seal to my head, which is usually critical for proper bass response, but since the bass is just right anyway, the only issue with the fit is that it's not as luxurious as with the pricier headphones. The SRH440 earpads are quite good, and are a huge step up in quality from (for example) the Sennheiser HD280 Pro earpads.Earcup rotation is no more than a few degrees horizontally. Vertical rotation is 180 degrees, so from the earcup rotations I'd expect the SRH440 to fit a wide range of head sizes. My average-size head fits with the earcups pulled out to click stop no. 4, allowing a 3/4 inch smaller and 5/4 inch larger adjustment to the headband on each side. The long coiled cable is single-entry to the left earcup, and has a proprietary detachable locking connector with a 2.5 mm stereo plug (same as other Shure headphones). The cable is terminated with a standard 3.5 mm miniplug threaded for a 6.35 mm plug adapter (included). A soft plastic carry bag is also included.The comments in the music tracks listed in this review can be compared to other headphone reviews I've done, to get an idea of how the SRH440 plays the different music tracks listed here compared to other headphones. My suggestion is instead of reading each comment below as an absolute unto itself, you could compare these notes to other reviews as they get posted, and see how the SRH440 compares with each individual track.Animotion - Obsession (1980's New Wave/Techno): The upper bass synth has excellent detail and tone with a modest weight, and both male and female vocals sound natural without favoring either. The SRH440 plays this extremely well.Bauhaus - Bela Lugosi's Dead (~1980): Strong midrange sound effects - this is a good worst-case test for resonant-type sounds in the most sensitive midrange area. Handled perfectly by the SRH440.Beethoven Symphony 9, Solti/CSO (1972): Excellent overall sound. Of special note here are the bass impacts beginning around 10:30 of the fourth movement. Those impacts are soft and well in the background, but you can feel some of the weight they carry with the SRH440.Black Sabbath - Iron Man (Classic Rock): Very good instrumental detail and the vocal sounds very natural. As with most classic rock tracks, there is very little or no deep bass. The SRH440 plays this music smoothly, and the lack of deep bass doesn't unbalance the treble.Boz Scaggs - Lowdown (1976): Good sound quality - this is a great test for any nasality in the midrange. Handled extremely well by the SRH440.Cantus - Danny Boy (Traditional/Male Choral/Acapella): The SRH440 plays the voices with enough low end warmth and weight to sound very natural, yet there is no added emphasis of the lower register of the male voices on this track.Cath Carroll - Moves Like You (1980's New Wave/Techno): This track's percussion and voice are crisp and well-balanced, and there's a good sense of space or soundstage around the voices and instruments. The SRH440 reproduces the space and detail convincingly.Catherine Wheel - Black Metallic (~1991): Goth with industrial overtones - I like this since it's a great music composition and the sound effects are smoothly integrated into the mix. This may sound distorted or mushy with some headphones, but the SRH440 renders the deliberate instrumental distortions clearly.Chris Isaak - Wicked Game (Pop/Rock): The SRH440 plays this high treble energy recording very smoothly - the voice and instruments are detailed but not sharp or edgy.Chromatics - I'm On Fire (Synth-Pop, female lead): This track has a good amount of space around the voice and instruments, making for a very pleasant stereo image. The voice is excellent and the tambourine sound has better than average tonality.David Hazeltine - Fur Elise (Jazz): A very high-quality recording from HDTracks. The SRH440 reproduces the instruments smoothly with a spacious ambiance. The wire-brush-on-cymbal harmonics are very extended and detailed.Grieg (Beecham-Royal Philharmonic) - Peer Gynt-Solveig's Lullaby (Classical): This very old (late 1950's) stereo recording must have been made on the most expensive gear in the world, since the overall sound quality and especially Ilse Hollweg's amazing voice are as close to "being there" as I've heard with some of the better classical recordings made since the year 2000. The SRH440 plays this music perfectly.Hans Zimmer - Dark Knight-Aggressive Expansion (Soundtrack): The percussion in this track hits really hard, and the bass tones beginning around 0:45 have the ultra-deep "shuddery" kind of sound and feel that indicates a good deep-bass response. Overall, the SRH440 plays this music very well.Heaven 17 - Let Me Go (1980's New Wave/Techno): The bass instrument (guitar?) has very good detail, and the voices and ambiance have a "you are there" quality that's uncommon in early 1980's pop music. The SRH440 plays this track perfectly.Hugo Audiophile - 15-16 (Electronic): I'm not sure what the 15-16 stands for - perhaps track numbers from a CD album. The deep-bass tones that start around 33-34 seconds into the track reproduce extremely well with the SRH440. This is a great recording for evaluating whether a headphone's bass will be sufficient for most environments, since for many headphones that have a weaker bass, the deep bass gets absorbed and mostly lost when the environment contains a lot of low-frequency energy.Human League - Keep Feeling Fascination (1980's New Wave/Techno): This track's bass line is very detailed, but the somewhat forward voices don't have quite the "you are there" quality of the Heaven 17 track noted above.Jimmy Smith - Basin Street Blues (early 60's): This track has several loud crescendos of brass and other instruments that don't sound clean and musical with some headphones. The SRH440 provides excellent detail. Listen particularly to the second crescendo at 15 seconds in for maximum detail effect. I'd like to emphasize that these crescendos are probably the worst-case test I have for instrument separation and detail, and the SRH440 does those exceptionally well.Kellogg Auditorium, Battle Creek Michigan, Aeolian-Skinner Organ (1933) - Pedal, 32', Resultant, Arpeggio: This 16 hz organ pedal tone differs from other music tones in that you won't "hear" the tone - you'll only feel it. Although most music tones have harmonics (including this one), the harmonics from this tone will be too weak to provide any "feel", so whatever you actually hear would not be part of the fundamental 16 hz tone. There are ~30 hz sounds in the outdoor environment in big cities, generated by large trucks, buses, and subway trains, and they have a quality of "rumble" that's similar to some deep-bass tones found in music. This 16 hz organ tone is easily distinguished from those sounds when compared on a headphone that has good undistorted response at 16 hz. The SRH440 plays this very well.Mantovani - Sunrise Sunset (Easy Listening, ca. 1972): A master musician and conductor who specialized in light classics and orchestral pop music, Mantovani's accomplishments were overshadowed by music critics who couldn't tolerate the notion of "light classics" or "semi-classical" music, even when those recordings were no threat to the classical music genres. In any case the later Mantovani recordings from the mid-1960's through mid-1970's had the advantage of being mixed for much better hi-fi systems than those which the music critics possessed at the start of the Long Playing (LP) record cycle. Here in 2014, at least some of those digital remasters have improved the sound further, although it's not always the case. This track as played on the SRH440 is an excellent example of the sheer musicality lurking in those later recordings, and is highly recommended for soundstage, instrumental tone, and musical balance.Michael Tilson Thomas - Rhapsody In Blue (20th Century Classic): Great sound and soundstage, and terrific piano playing and tone. There are some very deep bass impacts starting around 38 seconds into the 17:24 length track, and the weight of those impacts is subtle but appreciable with the SRH440.Porcupine Tree - Trains (Pop-Rock): This track opens with some nicely-detailed string sounds and a forward-sounding male voice with a higher-than-average register. There are a series of "clip-clop" effects starting at 3:19 that should sound like they were made with wooden blocks of some kind. The SRH440 reproduces those sounds very well.Richard Strauss (Mester-Pasadena) - Also Sprach Zarathustra (opening) (Classical): The granddaddy of bass is in the opening 1:50 of this recording, and I've heard it only once on a large and expensive loudspeaker system in Cleveland. For most people, that experience would be indistinguishable from being in a fairly strong earthquake. The SRH440 conveys as much of that experience as is possible on a more-or-less neutral headphone. The tympani also have good impact here.Scarlatti-Kipnis - Sonata in E Major K381 (Classical, Harpsichord): The harpsichord here is fairly bright and highly detailed, and the SRH440 renders the tones and transients very well.Trombone Shorty - Backatown (Jazz-Funk): The deep bass impacts here are quite strong, and work very well with the horns and other instruments. The SRH440 delivers the impacts with proper weight and detail, and the horns have the kind of bite that gives them a wonderfully realistic sound.William Orbit - Optical Illusion (Billy Buttons Mix) (Electronic): This is about as close as I want to get to easy-listening music. The string tones beginning at 0:18 are fairly soft, and while the bass isn't very deep, it still adds a good underpinning to the music. The short poetic rap at 4:14, preceded by an etherial female voice, works very well with this track.

Answer: provides excellent detail

The SRH440 provides excellent detail .

Sources: iPhone5 with PA2V2/FiiO E07k/Decware Zen Head amps using the LOD, various computers using the Microstreamer/Beyer A200p/v-moda Verza DAC/amps. Review notes: My first impressions of the sound of the SRH440 are based on direct comparisons to other headphones - the v-moda M80 and M100, the Beyerdynamic DT1350 and T51p, the FAD Pandora IV and VI, and notes I've accumulated from many prior reviews. I describe how I relate to the SRH440 (i.e. my personal tastes and how I use the headphone) only after covering all of the objective issues. Summary of sound: It's no coincidence that the SRH440 has such a good soundstage and sense of openness, since those properties are highly dependent on a neutral frequency response that's free of peaks, recesses, and colorations which derive mainly from undamped resonances. My first impression of the SRH440 is neutral sound. But it's much better than that. In my 80-odd headphone reviews, I've used expressions like "fairly neutral" or "basically neutral" etc., but the number of those that I'd play with no EQ whatever were very few: B&W; P7, Beyerdynamic Custom One Pro, FAD Pandora VI, Mad Dog, Sennheiser IE800, and the Shure SRH1840. Compared to those six, the SRH440 gets close to the Mad Dog and the IE800, and has a better signature I think than the other four. In the case of the P7 and Pandora VI, their responses are slightly more 'V'-shaped, but still fine for most genres as is. The Custom One Pro and the SRH1840 are a bit more bland, but also fine for most music genres. The SRH440's (understandable) limitation is its ultimate resolution - the most expensive headphones I've listed here have a subtly clearer sound that's noticeable in direct comparisons, but when the SRH440 is heard on its own, I doubt that very many users would hear the sound as any less than perfect. Some concerns I have with low-cost headphones are inconsistencies in matching the sound between the left and right drivers, and matching the sound between different production samples of the same headphone. When there are any such inconsistencies, a customer may experience a very different sound than what they were expecting based on reviews they've read. Although the SRH440 is only $99 USD currently, every indication I have is for a high quality well-made product. The limitations I notice most compared to the more expensive headphones are the fit and finish - the finish is plain and plastic, but elegant in its simplicity. The earcup fit doesn't feel as though it's making a good seal to my head, which is usually critical for proper bass response, but since the bass is just right anyway, the only issue with the fit is that it's not as luxurious as with the pricier headphones. The SRH440 earpads are quite good, and are a huge step up in quality from (for example) the Sennheiser HD280 Pro earpads. Earcup rotation is no more than a few degrees horizontally. Vertical rotation is 180 degrees, so from the earcup rotations I'd expect the SRH440 to fit a wide range of head sizes. My average-size head fits with the earcups pulled out to click stop no. 4, allowing a 3/4 inch smaller and 5/4 inch larger adjustment to the headband on each side. The long coiled cable is single-entry to the left earcup, and has a proprietary detachable locking connector with a 2.5 mm stereo plug (same as other Shure headphones). The cable is terminated with a standard 3.5 mm miniplug threaded for a 6.35 mm plug adapter (included). A soft plastic carry bag is also included. The comments in the music tracks listed in this review can be compared to other headphone reviews I've done, to get an idea of how the SRH440 plays the different music tracks listed here compared to other headphones. My suggestion is instead of reading each comment below as an absolute unto itself, you could compare these notes to other reviews as they get posted, and see how the SRH440 compares with each individual track. Animotion - Obsession (1980's New Wave/Techno): The upper bass synth has excellent detail and tone with a modest weight, and both male and female vocals sound natural without favoring either. The SRH440 plays this extremely well. Bauhaus - Bela Lugosi's Dead (~1980): Strong midrange sound effects - this is a good worst-case test for resonant-type sounds in the most sensitive midrange area. Handled perfectly by the SRH440.Beethoven Symphony 9, Solti/CSO (1972): Excellent overall sound. Of special note here are the bass impacts beginning around 10:30 of the fourth movement. Those impacts are soft and well in the background, but you can feel some of the weight they carry with the SRH440.Black Sabbath - Iron Man (Classic Rock): Very good instrumental detail and the vocal sounds very natural. As with most classic rock tracks, there is very little or no deep bass. The SRH440 plays this music smoothly, and the lack of deep bass doesn't unbalance the treble. Boz Scaggs - Lowdown (1976): Good sound quality - this is a great test for any nasality in the midrange. Handled extremely well by the SRH440.Cantus - Danny Boy (Traditional/Male Choral/Acapella): The SRH440 plays the voices with enough low end warmth and weight to sound very natural, yet there is no added emphasis of the lower register of the male voices on this track. Cath Carroll - Moves Like You (1980's New Wave/Techno): This track's percussion and voice are crisp and well-balanced, and there's a good sense of space or soundstage around the voices and instruments. The SRH440 reproduces the space and detail convincingly. Catherine Wheel - Black Metallic (~1991): Goth with industrial overtones - I like this since it's a great music composition and the sound effects are smoothly integrated into the mix. This may sound distorted or mushy with some headphones, but the SRH440 renders the deliberate instrumental distortions clearly. Chris Isaak - Wicked Game (Pop/Rock): The SRH440 plays this high treble energy recording very smoothly - the voice and instruments are detailed but not sharp or edgy. Chromatics - I'm On Fire (Synth-Pop, female lead): This track has a good amount of space around the voice and instruments, making for a very pleasant stereo image. The voice is excellent and the tambourine sound has better than average tonality. David Hazeltine - Fur Elise (Jazz): A very high-quality recording from HDTracks. The SRH440 reproduces the instruments smoothly with a spacious ambiance. The wire-brush-on-cymbal harmonics are very extended and detailed. Grieg (Beecham-Royal Philharmonic) - Peer Gynt-Solveig's Lullaby (Classical): This very old (late 1950's) stereo recording must have been made on the most expensive gear in the world, since the overall sound quality and especially Ilse Hollweg's amazing voice are as close to "being there" as I've heard with some of the better classical recordings made since the year 2000. The SRH440 plays this music perfectly. Hans Zimmer - Dark Knight-Aggressive Expansion (Soundtrack): The percussion in this track hits really hard, and the bass tones beginning around 0:45 have the ultra-deep "shuddery" kind of sound and feel that indicates a good deep-bass response. Overall, the SRH440 plays this music very well. Heaven 17 - Let Me Go (1980's New Wave/Techno): The bass instrument (guitar?) has very good detail, and the voices and ambiance have a "you are there" quality that's uncommon in early 1980's pop music. The SRH440 plays this track perfectly. Hugo Audiophile - 15-16 (Electronic): I'm not sure what the 15-16 stands for - perhaps track numbers from a CD album. The deep-bass tones that start around 33-34 seconds into the track reproduce extremely well with the SRH440. This is a great recording for evaluating whether a headphone's bass will be sufficient for most environments, since for many headphones that have a weaker bass, the deep bass gets absorbed and mostly lost when the environment contains a lot of low-frequency energy. Human League - Keep Feeling Fascination (1980's New Wave/Techno): This track's bass line is very detailed, but the somewhat forward voices don't have quite the "you are there" quality of the Heaven 17 track noted above. Jimmy Smith - Basin Street Blues (early 60's): This track has several loud crescendos of brass and other instruments that don't sound clean and musical with some headphones. <hl> The SRH440 provides excellent detail . <hl> Listen particularly to the second crescendo at 15 seconds in for maximum detail effect. I'd like to emphasize that these crescendos are probably the worst-case test I have for instrument separation and detail, and the SRH440 does those exceptionally well. Kellogg Auditorium, Battle Creek Michigan, Aeolian-Skinner Organ (1933) - Pedal, 32', Resultant, Arpeggio: This 16 hz organ pedal tone differs from other music tones in that you won't "hear" the tone - you'll only feel it. Although most music tones have harmonics (including this one), the harmonics from this tone will be too weak to provide any "feel", so whatever you actually hear would not be part of the fundamental 16 hz tone. There are ~30 hz sounds in the outdoor environment in big cities, generated by large trucks, buses, and subway trains, and they have a quality of "rumble" that's similar to some deep-bass tones found in music. This 16 hz organ tone is easily distinguished from those sounds when compared on a headphone that has good undistorted response at 16 hz. The SRH440 plays this very well. Mantovani - Sunrise Sunset (Easy Listening, ca. 1972): A master musician and conductor who specialized in light classics and orchestral pop music, Mantovani's accomplishments were overshadowed by music critics who couldn't tolerate the notion of "light classics" or "semi-classical" music, even when those recordings were no threat to the classical music genres. In any case the later Mantovani recordings from the mid-1960's through mid-1970's had the advantage of being mixed for much better hi-fi systems than those which the music critics possessed at the start of the Long Playing (LP) record cycle. Here in 2014, at least some of those digital remasters have improved the sound further, although it's not always the case. This track as played on the SRH440 is an excellent example of the sheer musicality lurking in those later recordings, and is highly recommended for soundstage, instrumental tone, and musical balance. Michael Tilson Thomas - Rhapsody In Blue (20th Century Classic): Great sound and soundstage, and terrific piano playing and tone. There are some very deep bass impacts starting around 38 seconds into the 17:24 length track, and the weight of those impacts is subtle but appreciable with the SRH440.Porcupine Tree - Trains (Pop-Rock): This track opens with some nicely-detailed string sounds and a forward-sounding male voice with a higher-than-average register. There are a series of "clip-clop" effects starting at 3:19 that should sound like they were made with wooden blocks of some kind. The SRH440 reproduces those sounds very well. Richard Strauss (Mester-Pasadena) - Also Sprach Zarathustra (opening) (Classical): The granddaddy of bass is in the opening 1:50 of this recording, and I've heard it only once on a large and expensive loudspeaker system in Cleveland. For most people, that experience would be indistinguishable from being in a fairly strong earthquake. The SRH440 conveys as much of that experience as is possible on a more-or-less neutral headphone. The tympani also have good impact here. Scarlatti-Kipnis - Sonata in E Major K381 (Classical, Harpsichord): The harpsichord here is fairly bright and highly detailed, and the SRH440 renders the tones and transients very well. Trombone Shorty - Backatown (Jazz-Funk): The deep bass impacts here are quite strong, and work very well with the horns and other instruments. The SRH440 delivers the impacts with proper weight and detail, and the horns have the kind of bite that gives them a wonderfully realistic sound. William Orbit - Optical Illusion (Billy Buttons Mix) (Electronic): This is about as close as I want to get to easy-listening music. The string tones beginning at 0:18 are fairly soft, and while the bass isn't very deep, it still adds a good underpinning to the music. The short poetic rap at 4:14, preceded by an etherial female voice, works very well with this track.

Sources: iPhone5 with PA2V2/FiiO E07k/Decware Zen Head amps using the LOD, various computers using the Microstreamer/Beyer A200p/v-moda Verza DAC/amps.Review notes: My first impressions of the sound of the SRH440 are based on direct comparisons to other headphones - the v-moda M80 and M100, the Beyerdynamic DT1350 and T51p, the FAD Pandora IV and VI, and notes I've accumulated from many prior reviews. I describe how I relate to the SRH440 (i.e. my personal tastes and how I use the headphone) only after covering all of the objective issues.Summary of sound: It's no coincidence that the SRH440 has such a good soundstage and sense of openness, since those properties are highly dependent on a neutral frequency response that's free of peaks, recesses, and colorations which derive mainly from undamped resonances.My first impression of the SRH440 is neutral sound. But it's much better than that. In my 80-odd headphone reviews, I've used expressions like "fairly neutral" or "basically neutral" etc., but the number of those that I'd play with no EQ whatever were very few: B&W; P7, Beyerdynamic Custom One Pro, FAD Pandora VI, Mad Dog, Sennheiser IE800, and the Shure SRH1840. Compared to those six, the SRH440 gets close to the Mad Dog and the IE800, and has a better signature I think than the other four. In the case of the P7 and Pandora VI, their responses are slightly more 'V'-shaped, but still fine for most genres as is. The Custom One Pro and the SRH1840 are a bit more bland, but also fine for most music genres. The SRH440's (understandable) limitation is its ultimate resolution - the most expensive headphones I've listed here have a subtly clearer sound that's noticeable in direct comparisons, but when the SRH440 is heard on its own, I doubt that very many users would hear the sound as any less than perfect.Some concerns I have with low-cost headphones are inconsistencies in matching the sound between the left and right drivers, and matching the sound between different production samples of the same headphone. When there are any such inconsistencies, a customer may experience a very different sound than what they were expecting based on reviews they've read. Although the SRH440 is only $99 USD currently, every indication I have is for a high quality well-made product. The limitations I notice most compared to the more expensive headphones are the fit and finish - the finish is plain and plastic, but elegant in its simplicity. The earcup fit doesn't feel as though it's making a good seal to my head, which is usually critical for proper bass response, but since the bass is just right anyway, the only issue with the fit is that it's not as luxurious as with the pricier headphones. The SRH440 earpads are quite good, and are a huge step up in quality from (for example) the Sennheiser HD280 Pro earpads.Earcup rotation is no more than a few degrees horizontally. Vertical rotation is 180 degrees, so from the earcup rotations I'd expect the SRH440 to fit a wide range of head sizes. My average-size head fits with the earcups pulled out to click stop no. 4, allowing a 3/4 inch smaller and 5/4 inch larger adjustment to the headband on each side. The long coiled cable is single-entry to the left earcup, and has a proprietary detachable locking connector with a 2.5 mm stereo plug (same as other Shure headphones). The cable is terminated with a standard 3.5 mm miniplug threaded for a 6.35 mm plug adapter (included). A soft plastic carry bag is also included.The comments in the music tracks listed in this review can be compared to other headphone reviews I've done, to get an idea of how the SRH440 plays the different music tracks listed here compared to other headphones. My suggestion is instead of reading each comment below as an absolute unto itself, you could compare these notes to other reviews as they get posted, and see how the SRH440 compares with each individual track.Animotion - Obsession (1980's New Wave/Techno): The upper bass synth has excellent detail and tone with a modest weight, and both male and female vocals sound natural without favoring either. The SRH440 plays this extremely well.Bauhaus - Bela Lugosi's Dead (~1980): Strong midrange sound effects - this is a good worst-case test for resonant-type sounds in the most sensitive midrange area. Handled perfectly by the SRH440.Beethoven Symphony 9, Solti/CSO (1972): Excellent overall sound. Of special note here are the bass impacts beginning around 10:30 of the fourth movement. Those impacts are soft and well in the background, but you can feel some of the weight they carry with the SRH440.Black Sabbath - Iron Man (Classic Rock): Very good instrumental detail and the vocal sounds very natural. As with most classic rock tracks, there is very little or no deep bass. The SRH440 plays this music smoothly, and the lack of deep bass doesn't unbalance the treble.Boz Scaggs - Lowdown (1976): Good sound quality - this is a great test for any nasality in the midrange. Handled extremely well by the SRH440.Cantus - Danny Boy (Traditional/Male Choral/Acapella): The SRH440 plays the voices with enough low end warmth and weight to sound very natural, yet there is no added emphasis of the lower register of the male voices on this track.Cath Carroll - Moves Like You (1980's New Wave/Techno): This track's percussion and voice are crisp and well-balanced, and there's a good sense of space or soundstage around the voices and instruments. The SRH440 reproduces the space and detail convincingly.Catherine Wheel - Black Metallic (~1991): Goth with industrial overtones - I like this since it's a great music composition and the sound effects are smoothly integrated into the mix. This may sound distorted or mushy with some headphones, but the SRH440 renders the deliberate instrumental distortions clearly.Chris Isaak - Wicked Game (Pop/Rock): The SRH440 plays this high treble energy recording very smoothly - the voice and instruments are detailed but not sharp or edgy.Chromatics - I'm On Fire (Synth-Pop, female lead): This track has a good amount of space around the voice and instruments, making for a very pleasant stereo image. The voice is excellent and the tambourine sound has better than average tonality.David Hazeltine - Fur Elise (Jazz): A very high-quality recording from HDTracks. The SRH440 reproduces the instruments smoothly with a spacious ambiance. The wire-brush-on-cymbal harmonics are very extended and detailed.Grieg (Beecham-Royal Philharmonic) - Peer Gynt-Solveig's Lullaby (Classical): This very old (late 1950's) stereo recording must have been made on the most expensive gear in the world, since the overall sound quality and especially Ilse Hollweg's amazing voice are as close to "being there" as I've heard with some of the better classical recordings made since the year 2000. The SRH440 plays this music perfectly.Hans Zimmer - Dark Knight-Aggressive Expansion (Soundtrack): The percussion in this track hits really hard, and the bass tones beginning around 0:45 have the ultra-deep "shuddery" kind of sound and feel that indicates a good deep-bass response. Overall, the SRH440 plays this music very well.Heaven 17 - Let Me Go (1980's New Wave/Techno): The bass instrument (guitar?) has very good detail, and the voices and ambiance have a "you are there" quality that's uncommon in early 1980's pop music. The SRH440 plays this track perfectly.Hugo Audiophile - 15-16 (Electronic): I'm not sure what the 15-16 stands for - perhaps track numbers from a CD album. The deep-bass tones that start around 33-34 seconds into the track reproduce extremely well with the SRH440. This is a great recording for evaluating whether a headphone's bass will be sufficient for most environments, since for many headphones that have a weaker bass, the deep bass gets absorbed and mostly lost when the environment contains a lot of low-frequency energy.Human League - Keep Feeling Fascination (1980's New Wave/Techno): This track's bass line is very detailed, but the somewhat forward voices don't have quite the "you are there" quality of the Heaven 17 track noted above.Jimmy Smith - Basin Street Blues (early 60's): This track has several loud crescendos of brass and other instruments that don't sound clean and musical with some headphones. The SRH440 <hl> provides excellent detail <hl>. Listen particularly to the second crescendo at 15 seconds in for maximum detail effect. I'd like to emphasize that these crescendos are probably the worst-case test I have for instrument separation and detail, and the SRH440 does those exceptionally well.Kellogg Auditorium, Battle Creek Michigan, Aeolian-Skinner Organ (1933) - Pedal, 32', Resultant, Arpeggio: This 16 hz organ pedal tone differs from other music tones in that you won't "hear" the tone - you'll only feel it. Although most music tones have harmonics (including this one), the harmonics from this tone will be too weak to provide any "feel", so whatever you actually hear would not be part of the fundamental 16 hz tone. There are ~30 hz sounds in the outdoor environment in big cities, generated by large trucks, buses, and subway trains, and they have a quality of "rumble" that's similar to some deep-bass tones found in music. This 16 hz organ tone is easily distinguished from those sounds when compared on a headphone that has good undistorted response at 16 hz. The SRH440 plays this very well.Mantovani - Sunrise Sunset (Easy Listening, ca. 1972): A master musician and conductor who specialized in light classics and orchestral pop music, Mantovani's accomplishments were overshadowed by music critics who couldn't tolerate the notion of "light classics" or "semi-classical" music, even when those recordings were no threat to the classical music genres. In any case the later Mantovani recordings from the mid-1960's through mid-1970's had the advantage of being mixed for much better hi-fi systems than those which the music critics possessed at the start of the Long Playing (LP) record cycle. Here in 2014, at least some of those digital remasters have improved the sound further, although it's not always the case. This track as played on the SRH440 is an excellent example of the sheer musicality lurking in those later recordings, and is highly recommended for soundstage, instrumental tone, and musical balance.Michael Tilson Thomas - Rhapsody In Blue (20th Century Classic): Great sound and soundstage, and terrific piano playing and tone. There are some very deep bass impacts starting around 38 seconds into the 17:24 length track, and the weight of those impacts is subtle but appreciable with the SRH440.Porcupine Tree - Trains (Pop-Rock): This track opens with some nicely-detailed string sounds and a forward-sounding male voice with a higher-than-average register. There are a series of "clip-clop" effects starting at 3:19 that should sound like they were made with wooden blocks of some kind. The SRH440 reproduces those sounds very well.Richard Strauss (Mester-Pasadena) - Also Sprach Zarathustra (opening) (Classical): The granddaddy of bass is in the opening 1:50 of this recording, and I've heard it only once on a large and expensive loudspeaker system in Cleveland. For most people, that experience would be indistinguishable from being in a fairly strong earthquake. The SRH440 conveys as much of that experience as is possible on a more-or-less neutral headphone. The tympani also have good impact here.Scarlatti-Kipnis - Sonata in E Major K381 (Classical, Harpsichord): The harpsichord here is fairly bright and highly detailed, and the SRH440 renders the tones and transients very well.Trombone Shorty - Backatown (Jazz-Funk): The deep bass impacts here are quite strong, and work very well with the horns and other instruments. The SRH440 delivers the impacts with proper weight and detail, and the horns have the kind of bite that gives them a wonderfully realistic sound.William Orbit - Optical Illusion (Billy Buttons Mix) (Electronic): This is about as close as I want to get to easy-listening music. The string tones beginning at 0:18 are fairly soft, and while the bass isn't very deep, it still adds a good underpinning to the music. The short poetic rap at 4:14, preceded by an etherial female voice, works very well with this track.

The SRH440 <hl> provides excellent detail <hl> .


Question: Do you have a price for a shoes?

I purchased this mouse (not from Amazon) to go with theLogitech K350 2.4Ghz Wireless Keyboard.  Both use the unifying receiver so one receiver for both keyboard and mouse- yay!  Or so I thought...  Unfortunately, this mouse was defective and I had to return it.  Due to the poor quality of the mouse I received along with other reviews having similar issues, I decided to go with a different mouse then to try my luck again with this one.Issues:Did not track accurately.  Tracking is sporadic.  It would appear to work properly, then not at all.Did not click accurately.  Had to click several times for the mouse to work.Tried changing mouse pads, no pad, putting a piece of paper underneath.. nothing helped.  The logitech software was the current, updated version.  What's sad is that when I went to return it, the tech at Staples (where I bought it) tried to test it and it wouldn't even work on his PC.  At least on mine, it somewhat worked.  The tech's PC did recognize it and yes, the mouse was turned on.  The pointer just wouldn't even move.I had major challenges with finding a mouse to work for my needs.  I finally settled on this one due to the following:Right size for my small handsErgonomicSomewhat ambidextrous.  I am left handed but typically use the right hand for the mouse (gee I wonder why that is.. gripe, gripe, gripe about the lack of good left handed mice!)  I could get away with using it in my left hand if needed (due to nerve pain I have to switch between my left and right hand as needed) but not for long term use.Had the unifying receiverFeatures: Had all the features I could possibly want or need.  I loved the hyper scroll and application switcher.  The buttons were unobtrusive and I never hit them unintentionally.I tested several other unifying receiver mice made by logitech and this was the one that fit my ergonomic needs the best.  TheLogitech Wireless Anywhere Mouse MX for PC and Macdoes have a good selection of features but it was too small.  TheLogitech Wireless Performance Mouse MX for PC and Macwas too big and not at all for left handed use.  TheLogitech LX7 Cordless Optical Mouse - Dark Blue ( 931395-0403 )is my backup mouse and is OK and theLogitech Wireless Mouse M505 (Black)was the next choice if just going off of ergonomics and comfort, but for the price and lack of features I decided to look outside of Logitech.What I found instead was theMicrosoft Explorer Mini Mouse.  This mouse fit similarly to the M705 and it is MUCH lighter and MUCH cheaper!  It also works better in my left hand then the M705.Like I said in my title, I wanted to love this mouse but it was so defective I didn't even want to try a second one. If you want to play roulette to see if you don't get a defective one (seeing some reviews I'm not the only one who got a defective one) then here's my pro's and cons list:PROSErgonomicComfortableUnifying ReceiverApplication SwitcherHyper ScrollUnobtrusive specialty buttonsCONSHeavyNot ambidextrousQuality (if you're like me it will be defective!)I hope this review was helpful!  If you suffer from nerve damage in your neck, arms and/or wrists (like I do) I ended up with theLogitech K350 2.4Ghz Wireless KeyboardandMicrosoft Explorer Mini Mouse.  I do graphic work from my PC and play computer games.  So far both these work perfectly.  The only down side is that I now have two wireless receivers on my desk rather than the one.  Good luck in your mouse search!

Answer: this mouse was defective and I had to return it

I purchased this mouse (not from Amazon) to go with theLogitech K350 2.4Ghz Wireless Keyboard. Both use the unifying receiver so one receiver for both keyboard and mouse- yay! Or so I thought... <hl> Unfortunately, this mouse was defective and I had to return it . <hl> Due to the poor quality of the mouse I received along with other reviews having similar issues, I decided to go with a different mouse then to try my luck again with this one. Issues:Did not track accurately. Tracking is sporadic. It would appear to work properly, then not at all. Did not click accurately. Had to click several times for the mouse to work. Tried changing mouse pads, no pad, putting a piece of paper underneath.. nothing helped. The logitech software was the current, updated version. What's sad is that when I went to return it, the tech at Staples (where I bought it) tried to test it and it wouldn't even work on his PC. At least on mine, it somewhat worked. The tech's PC did recognize it and yes, the mouse was turned on. The pointer just wouldn't even move. I had major challenges with finding a mouse to work for my needs. I finally settled on this one due to the following:Right size for my small handsErgonomicSomewhat ambidextrous. I am left handed but typically use the right hand for the mouse (gee I wonder why that is.. gripe, gripe, gripe about the lack of good left handed mice!) I could get away with using it in my left hand if needed (due to nerve pain I have to switch between my left and right hand as needed) but not for long term use. Had the unifying receiverFeatures: Had all the features I could possibly want or need. I loved the hyper scroll and application switcher. The buttons were unobtrusive and I never hit them unintentionally. I tested several other unifying receiver mice made by logitech and this was the one that fit my ergonomic needs the best. TheLogitech Wireless Anywhere Mouse MX for PC and Macdoes have a good selection of features but it was too small. TheLogitech Wireless Performance Mouse MX for PC and Macwas too big and not at all for left handed use. TheLogitech LX7 Cordless Optical Mouse - Dark Blue ( 931395-0403 )is my backup mouse and is OK and theLogitech Wireless Mouse M505 (Black)was the next choice if just going off of ergonomics and comfort, but for the price and lack of features I decided to look outside of Logitech. What I found instead was theMicrosoft Explorer Mini Mouse. This mouse fit similarly to the M705 and it is MUCH lighter and MUCH cheaper! It also works better in my left hand then the M705.Like I said in my title, I wanted to love this mouse but it was so defective I didn't even want to try a second one. If you want to play roulette to see if you don't get a defective one (seeing some reviews I'm not the only one who got a defective one) then here's my pro's and cons list:PROSErgonomicComfortableUnifying ReceiverApplication SwitcherHyper ScrollUnobtrusive specialty buttonsCONSHeavyNot ambidextrousQuality (if you're like me it will be defective!)I hope this review was helpful! If you suffer from nerve damage in your neck, arms and/or wrists (like I do) I ended up with theLogitech K350 2.4Ghz Wireless KeyboardandMicrosoft Explorer Mini Mouse. I do graphic work from my PC and play computer games. So far both these work perfectly. The only down side is that I now have two wireless receivers on my desk rather than the one. Good luck in your mouse search!

I purchased this mouse (not from Amazon) to go with theLogitech K350 2.4Ghz Wireless Keyboard. Both use the unifying receiver so one receiver for both keyboard and mouse- yay! Or so I thought... Unfortunately, <hl> this mouse was defective and I had to return it <hl>. Due to the poor quality of the mouse I received along with other reviews having similar issues, I decided to go with a different mouse then to try my luck again with this one.Issues:Did not track accurately. Tracking is sporadic. It would appear to work properly, then not at all.Did not click accurately. Had to click several times for the mouse to work.Tried changing mouse pads, no pad, putting a piece of paper underneath.. nothing helped. The logitech software was the current, updated version. What's sad is that when I went to return it, the tech at Staples (where I bought it) tried to test it and it wouldn't even work on his PC. At least on mine, it somewhat worked. The tech's PC did recognize it and yes, the mouse was turned on. The pointer just wouldn't even move.I had major challenges with finding a mouse to work for my needs. I finally settled on this one due to the following:Right size for my small handsErgonomicSomewhat ambidextrous. I am left handed but typically use the right hand for the mouse (gee I wonder why that is.. gripe, gripe, gripe about the lack of good left handed mice!) I could get away with using it in my left hand if needed (due to nerve pain I have to switch between my left and right hand as needed) but not for long term use.Had the unifying receiverFeatures: Had all the features I could possibly want or need. I loved the hyper scroll and application switcher. The buttons were unobtrusive and I never hit them unintentionally.I tested several other unifying receiver mice made by logitech and this was the one that fit my ergonomic needs the best. TheLogitech Wireless Anywhere Mouse MX for PC and Macdoes have a good selection of features but it was too small. TheLogitech Wireless Performance Mouse MX for PC and Macwas too big and not at all for left handed use. TheLogitech LX7 Cordless Optical Mouse - Dark Blue ( 931395-0403 )is my backup mouse and is OK and theLogitech Wireless Mouse M505 (Black)was the next choice if just going off of ergonomics and comfort, but for the price and lack of features I decided to look outside of Logitech.What I found instead was theMicrosoft Explorer Mini Mouse. This mouse fit similarly to the M705 and it is MUCH lighter and MUCH cheaper! It also works better in my left hand then the M705.Like I said in my title, I wanted to love this mouse but it was so defective I didn't even want to try a second one. If you want to play roulette to see if you don't get a defective one (seeing some reviews I'm not the only one who got a defective one) then here's my pro's and cons list:PROSErgonomicComfortableUnifying ReceiverApplication SwitcherHyper ScrollUnobtrusive specialty buttonsCONSHeavyNot ambidextrousQuality (if you're like me it will be defective!)I hope this review was helpful! If you suffer from nerve damage in your neck, arms and/or wrists (like I do) I ended up with theLogitech K350 2.4Ghz Wireless KeyboardandMicrosoft Explorer Mini Mouse. I do graphic work from my PC and play computer games. So far both these work perfectly. The only down side is that I now have two wireless receivers on my desk rather than the one. Good luck in your mouse search!

Unfortunately, <hl> this mouse was defective and I had to return it <hl> .


Question: How is the camera?

My wife and I are birders and are always on the look for a camera with great zooming ability that is still sufficiently light to carry. We have owned Canon's prior model, the SX40, for just 2 months and loved it. When the SX50 came out, we were tempted, but skeptical about the faster auto focus and the additional zooming ability. We decided to give it a try. The verdict: Canon managed to noticeably improve on an already excellent product, and we bit the bullet and bought the new model.Here are our observations:General impression: the camera is light, has a nice grip, and takes amazing bird pictures even with free hands. The image quality further improves with the aid of a light tripod. When it comes to landscape pictures, the image is less ideal (less sharp) comparing to those taken by Canon S95, a compact camera we own. So our solution is to carry both cameras (both are so light) if we want to have excellent pictures for birding/wild life and landscape.Below is a direct comparison between SX50 and SX40:Auto focus: It really is much faster and more reliable than the SX40's. This is a big deal, particularly for taking pictures of birds.1200mm zoom: This sounds too good to be true for free-hand shooting with a compact camera and in a way it is. At some point cropping yields better results than zooming. So I was skeptical whether SX50's extra zooming ability would really add any value compared to the SX40. Some extensive testing revealed that the SX50 performs equally well as the SX40 at the same (840mm) zoom level. When zooming in further, there is some additional resolution (sharper image) compared to cropping. However, the added value is small and disappears in all but at the very best lighting conditions.Aperture: The aperture numbers are less than stellar: 3.4W-6.5T. Keep in mind though that at 1200mm poor aperture numbers are simply a fact of life. Also worth mentioning: At around 840mm, the aperture is the same as the SX40's, so no loss there. That being said, I would not recommend using this camera except for its amazing zooming ability. In the standard or wide angle range most any compact camera will deliver better results than the SX50.In summary, the SX50 is an amazing camera if used for the special purpose that it is good for. This includes birding, wild life photography, and anything else that really needs zooming in to the max. However, this is not an all-purpose camera. If your main need is to take amazing landscape pictures, other compact cameras would be a better option. (For higher quality images, we use Canon S95 or 5D depending on weight restrictions).Worth mentioning: Before we purchased our SX40, we also tested Nikon P510. SX40 outperformed P510 in auto focus (speed & reliability) and picture quality (sharpness).Useful accessories to greatly improve image quality:- Sirui T-1204X: ultra lightweight and super sturdy tripod, essential to keep the ISO low.SIRUI 4 Section Pro Carbon Fiber Tripod T1204x with Professional Travel Bag- Sirui G-10 ball head: lightweight and smooth. Total weight with the T-1204X is about 2.5lbSIRUI G-10 29mm Ballhead with Quick Release, 40 lbs Load Capacity- Canon remote switch: to avoid shaking caused by pushing the shutter release button.Canon Remote Switch RS60 E3

Answer: camera with great zooming ability

<hl> My wife and I are birders and are always on the look for a camera with great zooming ability that is still sufficiently light to carry. <hl> We have owned Canon's prior model, the SX40, for just 2 months and loved it. When the SX50 came out, we were tempted, but skeptical about the faster auto focus and the additional zooming ability. We decided to give it a try. The verdict: Canon managed to noticeably improve on an already excellent product, and we bit the bullet and bought the new model. Here are our observations:General impression: the camera is light, has a nice grip, and takes amazing bird pictures even with free hands. The image quality further improves with the aid of a light tripod. When it comes to landscape pictures, the image is less ideal (less sharp) comparing to those taken by Canon S95, a compact camera we own. So our solution is to carry both cameras (both are so light) if we want to have excellent pictures for birding/wild life and landscape. Below is a direct comparison between SX50 and SX40:Auto focus: It really is much faster and more reliable than the SX40's. This is a big deal, particularly for taking pictures of birds.1200mm zoom: This sounds too good to be true for free-hand shooting with a compact camera and in a way it is. At some point cropping yields better results than zooming. So I was skeptical whether SX50's extra zooming ability would really add any value compared to the SX40. Some extensive testing revealed that the SX50 performs equally well as the SX40 at the same (840mm) zoom level. When zooming in further, there is some additional resolution (sharper image) compared to cropping. However, the added value is small and disappears in all but at the very best lighting conditions. Aperture: The aperture numbers are less than stellar: 3.4W-6.5T. Keep in mind though that at 1200mm poor aperture numbers are simply a fact of life. Also worth mentioning: At around 840mm, the aperture is the same as the SX40's, so no loss there. That being said, I would not recommend using this camera except for its amazing zooming ability. In the standard or wide angle range most any compact camera will deliver better results than the SX50.In summary, the SX50 is an amazing camera if used for the special purpose that it is good for. This includes birding, wild life photography, and anything else that really needs zooming in to the max. However, this is not an all-purpose camera. If your main need is to take amazing landscape pictures, other compact cameras would be a better option. (For higher quality images, we use Canon S95 or 5D depending on weight restrictions).Worth mentioning: Before we purchased our SX40, we also tested Nikon P510. SX40 outperformed P510 in auto focus (speed & reliability) and picture quality (sharpness).Useful accessories to greatly improve image quality:- Sirui T-1204X: ultra lightweight and super sturdy tripod, essential to keep the ISO low. SIRUI 4 Section Pro Carbon Fiber Tripod T1204x with Professional Travel Bag- Sirui G-10 ball head: lightweight and smooth. Total weight with the T-1204X is about 2.5lbSIRUI G-10 29mm Ballhead with Quick Release, 40 lbs Load Capacity- Canon remote switch: to avoid shaking caused by pushing the shutter release button. Canon Remote Switch RS60 E3

My wife and I are birders and are always on the look for a <hl> camera with great zooming ability <hl> that is still sufficiently light to carry. We have owned Canon's prior model, the SX40, for just 2 months and loved it. When the SX50 came out, we were tempted, but skeptical about the faster auto focus and the additional zooming ability. We decided to give it a try. The verdict: Canon managed to noticeably improve on an already excellent product, and we bit the bullet and bought the new model.Here are our observations:General impression: the camera is light, has a nice grip, and takes amazing bird pictures even with free hands. The image quality further improves with the aid of a light tripod. When it comes to landscape pictures, the image is less ideal (less sharp) comparing to those taken by Canon S95, a compact camera we own. So our solution is to carry both cameras (both are so light) if we want to have excellent pictures for birding/wild life and landscape.Below is a direct comparison between SX50 and SX40:Auto focus: It really is much faster and more reliable than the SX40's. This is a big deal, particularly for taking pictures of birds.1200mm zoom: This sounds too good to be true for free-hand shooting with a compact camera and in a way it is. At some point cropping yields better results than zooming. So I was skeptical whether SX50's extra zooming ability would really add any value compared to the SX40. Some extensive testing revealed that the SX50 performs equally well as the SX40 at the same (840mm) zoom level. When zooming in further, there is some additional resolution (sharper image) compared to cropping. However, the added value is small and disappears in all but at the very best lighting conditions.Aperture: The aperture numbers are less than stellar: 3.4W-6.5T. Keep in mind though that at 1200mm poor aperture numbers are simply a fact of life. Also worth mentioning: At around 840mm, the aperture is the same as the SX40's, so no loss there. That being said, I would not recommend using this camera except for its amazing zooming ability. In the standard or wide angle range most any compact camera will deliver better results than the SX50.In summary, the SX50 is an amazing camera if used for the special purpose that it is good for. This includes birding, wild life photography, and anything else that really needs zooming in to the max. However, this is not an all-purpose camera. If your main need is to take amazing landscape pictures, other compact cameras would be a better option. (For higher quality images, we use Canon S95 or 5D depending on weight restrictions).Worth mentioning: Before we purchased our SX40, we also tested Nikon P510. SX40 outperformed P510 in auto focus (speed & reliability) and picture quality (sharpness).Useful accessories to greatly improve image quality:- Sirui T-1204X: ultra lightweight and super sturdy tripod, essential to keep the ISO low.SIRUI 4 Section Pro Carbon Fiber Tripod T1204x with Professional Travel Bag- Sirui G-10 ball head: lightweight and smooth. Total weight with the T-1204X is about 2.5lbSIRUI G-10 29mm Ballhead with Quick Release, 40 lbs Load Capacity- Canon remote switch: to avoid shaking caused by pushing the shutter release button.Canon Remote Switch RS60 E3


Question: How to send a package with packaging?

I was familiar with Bluerigger from a prior purchase of 2 HDMI to DVI cables for my computer and I was thoroughly impressed with the quality of the product.  Recently, I figured out that I had some older HDMI cables in my HDTV and I realized that maybe I should update the cables with some better product.I have typically thought that the manufacture of certain things relied on branding more than reality like with cables and I again went with Bluerigger.First off, for the money, these cables are superior.  The packaging is excellent with a nice wrapping and protection in a nice box (recycled material).  Second, once I tried cables, I was blown away by how much difference was made in the picture quality.  The build quality is excellent as well, with a quality feel to the wrapping and heads.  With these cables, it is like I bought a new HDTV.  I didn't, but now the clarity of the images is pretty astonishing and has been remarked on by several people.Fantastic.  I can't recommend this product enough.  So far, this is a great addition, and for the money, why would you try anything else?  I wouldn't.

Answer: The packaging is excellent with a nice wrapping and protection in a nice box (recycled material)

I was familiar with Bluerigger from a prior purchase of 2 HDMI to DVI cables for my computer and I was thoroughly impressed with the quality of the product. Recently, I figured out that I had some older HDMI cables in my HDTV and I realized that maybe I should update the cables with some better product. I have typically thought that the manufacture of certain things relied on branding more than reality like with cables and I again went with Bluerigger. First off, for the money, these cables are superior. <hl> The packaging is excellent with a nice wrapping and protection in a nice box (recycled material) . <hl> Second, once I tried cables, I was blown away by how much difference was made in the picture quality. The build quality is excellent as well, with a quality feel to the wrapping and heads. With these cables, it is like I bought a new HDTV. I didn't, but now the clarity of the images is pretty astonishing and has been remarked on by several people. Fantastic. I can't recommend this product enough. So far, this is a great addition, and for the money, why would you try anything else? I wouldn't.

I was familiar with Bluerigger from a prior purchase of 2 HDMI to DVI cables for my computer and I was thoroughly impressed with the quality of the product. Recently, I figured out that I had some older HDMI cables in my HDTV and I realized that maybe I should update the cables with some better product.I have typically thought that the manufacture of certain things relied on branding more than reality like with cables and I again went with Bluerigger.First off, for the money, these cables are superior. <hl> The packaging is excellent with a nice wrapping and protection in a nice box (recycled material) <hl>. Second, once I tried cables, I was blown away by how much difference was made in the picture quality. The build quality is excellent as well, with a quality feel to the wrapping and heads. With these cables, it is like I bought a new HDTV. I didn't, but now the clarity of the images is pretty astonishing and has been remarked on by several people.Fantastic. I can't recommend this product enough. So far, this is a great addition, and for the money, why would you try anything else? I wouldn't.

<hl> The packaging is excellent with a nice wrapping and protection in a nice box (recycled material) <hl> .


Question: How is the setup of the router?

Upgrading to this rounder from my older router was very easy. The plug and play functions worked well and setup was very simple. The MAC address copying was also extremely helpful when working with Comcast internet.I have had only good experiences with stability and connectivity since I switched. Speeds have been good and consistent, even with many devices connected to the network. And the range has also been very good.The UI is as streamlined as some of the other more expensive products I have used, but all of the functionality I want is there (DMZ, Port Forwarding, etc) so there is not much to complain about. Overall I am very satisfied with this router.

Answer: Upgrading to this rounder from my older router was very easy

<hl> Upgrading to this rounder from my older router was very easy . <hl> The plug and play functions worked well and setup was very simple. The MAC address copying was also extremely helpful when working with Comcast internet. I have had only good experiences with stability and connectivity since I switched. Speeds have been good and consistent, even with many devices connected to the network. And the range has also been very good. The UI is as streamlined as some of the other more expensive products I have used, but all of the functionality I want is there (DMZ, Port Forwarding, etc) so there is not much to complain about. Overall I am very satisfied with this router.

<hl> Upgrading to this rounder from my older router was very easy <hl>. The plug and play functions worked well and setup was very simple. The MAC address copying was also extremely helpful when working with Comcast internet.I have had only good experiences with stability and connectivity since I switched. Speeds have been good and consistent, even with many devices connected to the network. And the range has also been very good.The UI is as streamlined as some of the other more expensive products I have used, but all of the functionality I want is there (DMZ, Port Forwarding, etc) so there is not much to complain about. Overall I am very satisfied with this router.

<hl> Upgrading to this rounder from my older router was very easy <hl> .


Question: Is it a good screen with those inches?

I bought the older Nexus 7 and was wildly impressed by its performance. After a few weeks I decided to donate that one to a family member so I could have my own newer model. Either one is great, and performs like a dream. The new screen on the "FHD" is gorgeous, battery life is great and I've had zero issues with it.I waited quite a while for a six inch tablet. This is the closest I could get to that without going the smartphone route. I don't use my phone much, pay $11 a month and don't want to pay for a cell phone account. This still fits in a pocket, but it's a tight fit and I have loose fitting jeans.For the price, it's insane how much you can get from this tablet. I highly recommend it. I can't understand anyone's justification for going the iPad Mini route when you can have twice the quality and performance at 1/3rd the price.If you know you can get apps you need for Android, then just go with a tablet that isn't stamped with the "Apple" label. The only time I could't justify someone getting an iOS tablet is musicians, which have many apps for direct guitar plug-in, piano/keyboard and many other music-based effects that are hard to find (for now) on Android.Otherwise, there's no reason to waste your money on something that just has a company's logo on it as proof of "quality".

Answer: The new screen on the "FHD

I bought the older Nexus 7 and was wildly impressed by its performance. After a few weeks I decided to donate that one to a family member so I could have my own newer model. Either one is great, and performs like a dream. <hl> The new screen on the "FHD " is gorgeous, battery life is great and I've had zero issues with it. <hl> I waited quite a while for a six inch tablet. This is the closest I could get to that without going the smartphone route. I don't use my phone much, pay $11 a month and don't want to pay for a cell phone account. This still fits in a pocket, but it's a tight fit and I have loose fitting jeans. For the price, it's insane how much you can get from this tablet. I highly recommend it. I can't understand anyone's justification for going the iPad Mini route when you can have twice the quality and performance at 1/3rd the price. If you know you can get apps you need for Android, then just go with a tablet that isn't stamped with the "Apple" label. The only time I could't justify someone getting an iOS tablet is musicians, which have many apps for direct guitar plug-in, piano/keyboard and many other music-based effects that are hard to find (for now) on Android. Otherwise, there's no reason to waste your money on something that just has a company's logo on it as proof of "quality".

I bought the older Nexus 7 and was wildly impressed by its performance. After a few weeks I decided to donate that one to a family member so I could have my own newer model. Either one is great, and performs like a dream. <hl> The new screen on the "FHD <hl>" is gorgeous, battery life is great and I've had zero issues with it.I waited quite a while for a six inch tablet. This is the closest I could get to that without going the smartphone route. I don't use my phone much, pay $11 a month and don't want to pay for a cell phone account. This still fits in a pocket, but it's a tight fit and I have loose fitting jeans.For the price, it's insane how much you can get from this tablet. I highly recommend it. I can't understand anyone's justification for going the iPad Mini route when you can have twice the quality and performance at 1/3rd the price.If you know you can get apps you need for Android, then just go with a tablet that isn't stamped with the "Apple" label. The only time I could't justify someone getting an iOS tablet is musicians, which have many apps for direct guitar plug-in, piano/keyboard and many other music-based effects that are hard to find (for now) on Android.Otherwise, there's no reason to waste your money on something that just has a company's logo on it as proof of "quality".

<hl> The new screen on the "FHD <hl> " is gorgeous, battery life is great and I've had zero issues with it.


Question: How is the sound?

These headphones have a tinny, weak sound, worse than the Apple earbuds that I had been using at work.  Also, they are only 3 inches longer than the overly short Apple ones.  They are not comfortable, and the noise cancelling comes from jamming them into your ear, nothing else.

Answer: These headphones have a tinny, weak sound

<hl> These headphones have a tinny, weak sound , worse than the Apple earbuds that I had been using at work. <hl> Also, they are only 3 inches longer than the overly short Apple ones. They are not comfortable, and the noise cancelling comes from jamming them into your ear, nothing else.

<hl> These headphones have a tinny, weak sound <hl>, worse than the Apple earbuds that I had been using at work. Also, they are only 3 inches longer than the overly short Apple ones. They are not comfortable, and the noise cancelling comes from jamming them into your ear, nothing else.

<hl> These headphones have a tinny, weak sound <hl> , worse than the Apple earbuds that I had been using at work.


Question: How is the screen?

I heard a lot of good comments about this tablet, but for me, the jury is out until I get one in my hot little hands.  It's in my hands now and I like it!  It's very fast and I really think the screen resolution and clarity of display is very good!  It's also very light, and lighter than my iPad (4th gen).I feel this is a product worth considering as an alternative to the iPad (starting with cost) and you can do a lot with it.

Answer: screen resolution and clarity of display is very good

I heard a lot of good comments about this tablet, but for me, the jury is out until I get one in my hot little hands. It's in my hands now and I like it! It's very fast and I really think <hl> the screen resolution and clarity of display is very good ! <hl> It's also very light, and lighter than my iPad (4th gen).I feel this is a product worth considering as an alternative to the iPad (starting with cost) and you can do a lot with it.

I heard a lot of good comments about this tablet, but for me, the jury is out until I get one in my hot little hands. It's in my hands now and I like it! It's very fast and I really think the <hl> screen resolution and clarity of display is very good <hl>! It's also very light, and lighter than my iPad (4th gen).I feel this is a product worth considering as an alternative to the iPad (starting with cost) and you can do a lot with it.

the <hl> screen resolution and clarity of display is very good <hl> !


Question: How is the price?

I have not had any problems with this hdmi cable. I had purchased a cable for $50!!, but when I saw these cables on Amazon while searching for a TV mount, I returned the previously purchased cable.  I now check Amazon for any kind of product I need because the prices are much better than the major stores.

Answer: I had purchased a cable for $50

I had purchased a cable for $50 !!

I have not had any problems with this hdmi cable. <hl> I had purchased a cable for $50 !! <hl> , but when I saw these cables on Amazon while searching for a TV mount, I returned the previously purchased cable. I now check Amazon for any kind of product I need because the prices are much better than the major stores.

I have not had any problems with this hdmi cable. <hl> I had purchased a cable for $50 <hl>!!, but when I saw these cables on Amazon while searching for a TV mount, I returned the previously purchased cable. I now check Amazon for any kind of product I need because the prices are much better than the major stores.

<hl> I had purchased a cable for $50 <hl> !!


Question: What is the difference in image?

So, this certainly isn't an L lens, however given the pricepoint and image quality, you can't go wrong.  I've used this lens at a number of motorsports events where the image stabilization is a must have.  Before using this lens, images were blurry and just as many were bad as good.  With the IS turned on, things look great.  Additionally, being able to shoot in lower light has allowed me to take some shots that might have otherwise gotten away.  I'd buy again, though this time I'd add the lens hood to it.

Answer: images were blurry and just as many were bad as good

So, this certainly isn't an L lens, however given the pricepoint and image quality, you can't go wrong. I've used this lens at a number of motorsports events where the image stabilization is a must have. <hl> Before using this lens, images were blurry and just as many were bad as good . <hl> With the IS turned on, things look great. Additionally, being able to shoot in lower light has allowed me to take some shots that might have otherwise gotten away. I'd buy again, though this time I'd add the lens hood to it.

So, this certainly isn't an L lens, however given the pricepoint and image quality, you can't go wrong. I've used this lens at a number of motorsports events where the image stabilization is a must have. Before using this lens, <hl> images were blurry and just as many were bad as good <hl>. With the IS turned on, things look great. Additionally, being able to shoot in lower light has allowed me to take some shots that might have otherwise gotten away. I'd buy again, though this time I'd add the lens hood to it.

Before using this lens, <hl> images were blurry and just as many were bad as good <hl> .


Question: How do you like the resolution?

Love, Love, Love my Kindle (I bought two for the holidays) my granddaughter got one from Santa and I decided to buy myself one.  I have been looking at Kindles for several years as I love to read and watch movies.  I am so glad I waited! It may not be fancy like the well known tablet, but the quality is excellent and does everything other smart devices can do or what I want it to do! Go Amazon!  The brillant colors and sounds through the Kindle is outstanding!  Just can't believe the price!One issue I have with this is having only one prime membership and two devices. My granddaughter can use any material that is in cloud (things that I may want to watch or read; but not age appropriate for her). I try to download my material to my device so I can remove it from Cloud. I tried to use the Kindle Free time feature; but I couldn't keep up with all the apps she is downloading; we only have the purchase parential control on as all of the controls are very restricted.  What is the point in having the device if the child can use it.  She is 11 years old 5th grader on a 8th grade level. The family has spoken about internet safety with her and currently she is following the rules we have set. We have a very secure home network and have features with the network we have set up. Also have installed free app from Norton Security. Within the first 2 hours she was downloading free apps that allowed her to phone & text her friends without any adult instructions! Good news about having the one prime membership I can see what apps she has downloaded from my device without having to log into my account from my laptop.  I can view all of her emails, texts and see the numbers she has phoned.I'm sure I am not using all of the features available; there is only so many free minutes in a day...I Love, Love, Love my Kindle Fire HD!

Answer: The brillant colors

Love, Love, Love my Kindle (I bought two for the holidays) my granddaughter got one from Santa and I decided to buy myself one. I have been looking at Kindles for several years as I love to read and watch movies. I am so glad I waited! It may not be fancy like the well known tablet, but the quality is excellent and does everything other smart devices can do or what I want it to do! Go Amazon! <hl> The brillant colors and sounds through the Kindle is outstanding! <hl> Just can't believe the price!One issue I have with this is having only one prime membership and two devices. My granddaughter can use any material that is in cloud (things that I may want to watch or read; but not age appropriate for her). I try to download my material to my device so I can remove it from Cloud. I tried to use the Kindle Free time feature; but I couldn't keep up with all the apps she is downloading; we only have the purchase parential control on as all of the controls are very restricted. What is the point in having the device if the child can use it. She is 11 years old 5th grader on a 8th grade level. The family has spoken about internet safety with her and currently she is following the rules we have set. We have a very secure home network and have features with the network we have set up. Also have installed free app from Norton Security. Within the first 2 hours she was downloading free apps that allowed her to phone & text her friends without any adult instructions! Good news about having the one prime membership I can see what apps she has downloaded from my device without having to log into my account from my laptop. I can view all of her emails, texts and see the numbers she has phoned. I'm sure I am not using all of the features available; there is only so many free minutes in a day... I Love, Love, Love my Kindle Fire HD!

Love, Love, Love my Kindle (I bought two for the holidays) my granddaughter got one from Santa and I decided to buy myself one. I have been looking at Kindles for several years as I love to read and watch movies. I am so glad I waited! It may not be fancy like the well known tablet, but the quality is excellent and does everything other smart devices can do or what I want it to do! Go Amazon! <hl> The brillant colors <hl> and sounds through the Kindle is outstanding! Just can't believe the price!One issue I have with this is having only one prime membership and two devices. My granddaughter can use any material that is in cloud (things that I may want to watch or read; but not age appropriate for her). I try to download my material to my device so I can remove it from Cloud. I tried to use the Kindle Free time feature; but I couldn't keep up with all the apps she is downloading; we only have the purchase parential control on as all of the controls are very restricted. What is the point in having the device if the child can use it. She is 11 years old 5th grader on a 8th grade level. The family has spoken about internet safety with her and currently she is following the rules we have set. We have a very secure home network and have features with the network we have set up. Also have installed free app from Norton Security. Within the first 2 hours she was downloading free apps that allowed her to phone & text her friends without any adult instructions! Good news about having the one prime membership I can see what apps she has downloaded from my device without having to log into my account from my laptop. I can view all of her emails, texts and see the numbers she has phoned.I'm sure I am not using all of the features available; there is only so many free minutes in a day...I Love, Love, Love my Kindle Fire HD!


Question: How do you rate the video?

My daughter ordered this with birthday money after researching cameras online. It was one of the cameras recommended by Ken Rockwell, and one of the few low-end digitals that still has an optical viewfinder. My pragmatic daughter insisted on this, since sometimes in bright light the LCD is hard to view.The camera is tiny! Even after seeing a picture of the camera hiding behind a credit card I was not prepared for how small it is! The buttons are recessed and the whole camera slips easily into a pocket without snagging on anything. Despite its small size, the LCD is easy to view, and the buttons are very usable.The second moment of awe was powering on. The camera turns on and off very quickly! Some other point-and-shoot digitals we've had have had a considerable delay before they are ready to shoot, extending the lens and running through the self-test of the software. This camera is not quite instantaneous, but it's very fast!The pictures are good quality, and it's easy to switch between photo and video mode. Another fun surprise was that the auto-focus places the camera in macro mode when you try to focus on something right in front of the lens. In short, the features of the camera are very well done.I can't comment on the battery life or sturdiness/durability because we've only had the camera for a short time and my daughter is fastidious about taking out the battery when she isn't actively using the camera.

Answer: fast!The pictures are good quality

My daughter ordered this with birthday money after researching cameras online. It was one of the cameras recommended by Ken Rockwell, and one of the few low-end digitals that still has an optical viewfinder. My pragmatic daughter insisted on this, since sometimes in bright light the LCD is hard to view. The camera is tiny! Even after seeing a picture of the camera hiding behind a credit card I was not prepared for how small it is! The buttons are recessed and the whole camera slips easily into a pocket without snagging on anything. Despite its small size, the LCD is easy to view, and the buttons are very usable. The second moment of awe was powering on. The camera turns on and off very quickly! Some other point-and-shoot digitals we've had have had a considerable delay before they are ready to shoot, extending the lens and running through the self-test of the software. <hl> This camera is not quite instantaneous, but it's very fast!The pictures are good quality , and it's easy to switch between photo and video mode. <hl> Another fun surprise was that the auto-focus places the camera in macro mode when you try to focus on something right in front of the lens. In short, the features of the camera are very well done. I can't comment on the battery life or sturdiness/durability because we've only had the camera for a short time and my daughter is fastidious about taking out the battery when she isn't actively using the camera.

My daughter ordered this with birthday money after researching cameras online. It was one of the cameras recommended by Ken Rockwell, and one of the few low-end digitals that still has an optical viewfinder. My pragmatic daughter insisted on this, since sometimes in bright light the LCD is hard to view.The camera is tiny! Even after seeing a picture of the camera hiding behind a credit card I was not prepared for how small it is! The buttons are recessed and the whole camera slips easily into a pocket without snagging on anything. Despite its small size, the LCD is easy to view, and the buttons are very usable.The second moment of awe was powering on. The camera turns on and off very quickly! Some other point-and-shoot digitals we've had have had a considerable delay before they are ready to shoot, extending the lens and running through the self-test of the software. This camera is not quite instantaneous, but it's very <hl> fast!The pictures are good quality <hl>, and it's easy to switch between photo and video mode. Another fun surprise was that the auto-focus places the camera in macro mode when you try to focus on something right in front of the lens. In short, the features of the camera are very well done.I can't comment on the battery life or sturdiness/durability because we've only had the camera for a short time and my daughter is fastidious about taking out the battery when she isn't actively using the camera.

This camera is not quite instantaneous, but it's very <hl> fast!The pictures are good quality <hl> , and it's easy to switch between photo and video mode.


Question: How is camera?

Very fast focus, better than my older D100. Quality of display image on the computer is a lot better than my Sony little digital camera even at the same resolution.One thing I really surprised and like, it has perspective control in the program. This is mighty important for architecture photography. You no longer need to buy a more expensive shift lens anymore for taking picture of buildings etc.Only slight complain. Camera of this quality should have a PC sync for studio and product photography use. I was a pro photographer before, this camera is perfect for pro use, I don't want to carry double the weigh, pay double the price for a real pro camera just hoping it will hold up when you drop them. Weight is the most important when you climb up and down. Also, camera out dated as fast as PC computers, why pay thousands for something that if only worth a few hundred three years later?

Answer: this camera is perfect for pro use

Very fast focus, better than my older D100. Quality of display image on the computer is a lot better than my Sony little digital camera even at the same resolution. One thing I really surprised and like, it has perspective control in the program. This is mighty important for architecture photography. You no longer need to buy a more expensive shift lens anymore for taking picture of buildings etc. Only slight complain. Camera of this quality should have a PC sync for studio and product photography use. <hl> I was a pro photographer before, this camera is perfect for pro use , I don't want to carry double the weigh, pay double the price for a real pro camera just hoping it will hold up when you drop them. <hl> Weight is the most important when you climb up and down. Also, camera out dated as fast as PC computers, why pay thousands for something that if only worth a few hundred three years later?

Very fast focus, better than my older D100. Quality of display image on the computer is a lot better than my Sony little digital camera even at the same resolution.One thing I really surprised and like, it has perspective control in the program. This is mighty important for architecture photography. You no longer need to buy a more expensive shift lens anymore for taking picture of buildings etc.Only slight complain. Camera of this quality should have a PC sync for studio and product photography use. I was a pro photographer before, <hl> this camera is perfect for pro use <hl>, I don't want to carry double the weigh, pay double the price for a real pro camera just hoping it will hold up when you drop them. Weight is the most important when you climb up and down. Also, camera out dated as fast as PC computers, why pay thousands for something that if only worth a few hundred three years later?

I was a pro photographer before, <hl> this camera is perfect for pro use <hl> , I don't want to carry double the weigh, pay double the price for a real pro camera just hoping it will hold up when you drop them.


Question: How is the connection of the cables?

Optical cable is connected to my new home theater system and my tv.  This connection was easy and provides great sound.

Answer: This connection was easy and provides great sound

Optical cable is connected to my new home theater system and my tv. <hl> This connection was easy and provides great sound . <hl>

Optical cable is connected to my new home theater system and my tv. <hl> This connection was easy and provides great sound <hl>.

<hl> This connection was easy and provides great sound <hl> .


Question: How is the product?

This thing is awesome, especially now that it supports HBO Go.  Just be sure you have an extra outlet or a USB device to plug it in.  Google is hella shady in their marketing and doesn't show the GIANT CABLE sticking out of the back.  Thankfully the product works really well.

Answer: the product works really well

This thing is awesome, especially now that it supports HBO Go. Just be sure you have an extra outlet or a USB device to plug it in. Google is hella shady in their marketing and doesn't show the GIANT CABLE sticking out of the back. <hl> Thankfully the product works really well . <hl>

This thing is awesome, especially now that it supports HBO Go. Just be sure you have an extra outlet or a USB device to plug it in. Google is hella shady in their marketing and doesn't show the GIANT CABLE sticking out of the back. Thankfully <hl> the product works really well <hl>.

Thankfully <hl> the product works really well <hl> .