answer: the dialogue is clunky
paragraph_question: question: How is it act?, context: del Toro's visual imagination is present in Pacific Rim, but his storytelling definitely is not.  At least the first half of the film is made up of voice over narratives, time jumps, and flashbacks.  It doesn't have a story so much as a vast sea of clumsy exposition, meant to establish extremely rote character arcs while instructing the audience on what everything is.  Charlie Hunnam's and Rinko Kinkuchi's characters both must overcome a lame contrived trauma beset on them by the Kaiju, giant CGI aliens/sea monsters.  Unfortunately, the dialogue is clunky when the characters talk to one another as well.  The actors must constantly fight del Toro's scifi mumbo jumbo to try to convey humanity.  Overall, Pacific Rim leaves the impression that its ideas were way to big for one movie, or simply not thought through. 
sentence:  Unfortunately, the dialogue is clunky when the characters talk to one another as well.
paragraph: del Toro's visual imagination is present in Pacific Rim, but his storytelling definitely is not.  At least the first half of the film is made up of voice over narratives, time jumps, and flashbacks.  It doesn't have a story so much as a vast sea of clumsy exposition, meant to establish extremely rote character arcs while instructing the audience on what everything is.  Charlie Hunnam's and Rinko Kinkuchi's characters both must overcome a lame contrived trauma beset on them by the Kaiju, giant CGI aliens/sea monsters.  Unfortunately, the dialogue is clunky when the characters talk to one another as well.  The actors must constantly fight del Toro's scifi mumbo jumbo to try to convey humanity.  Overall, Pacific Rim leaves the impression that its ideas were way to big for one movie, or simply not thought through. 
sentence_answer:  Unfortunately, <hl> the dialogue is clunky <hl> when the characters talk to one another as well.
paragraph_answer: del Toro's visual imagination is present in Pacific Rim, but his storytelling definitely is not. At least the first half of the film is made up of voice over narratives, time jumps, and flashbacks. It doesn't have a story so much as a vast sea of clumsy exposition, meant to establish extremely rote character arcs while instructing the audience on what everything is. Charlie Hunnam's and Rinko Kinkuchi's characters both must overcome a lame contrived trauma beset on them by the Kaiju, giant CGI aliens/sea monsters. Unfortunately, <hl> the dialogue is clunky <hl> when the characters talk to one another as well. The actors must constantly fight del Toro's scifi mumbo jumbo to try to convey humanity. Overall, Pacific Rim leaves the impression that its ideas were way to big for one movie, or simply not thought through. 
paragraph_sentence: del Toro's visual imagination is present in Pacific Rim, but his storytelling definitely is not. At least the first half of the film is made up of voice over narratives, time jumps, and flashbacks. It doesn't have a story so much as a vast sea of clumsy exposition, meant to establish extremely rote character arcs while instructing the audience on what everything is. Charlie Hunnam's and Rinko Kinkuchi's characters both must overcome a lame contrived trauma beset on them by the Kaiju, giant CGI aliens/sea monsters. <hl> Unfortunately, the dialogue is clunky when the characters talk to one another as well. <hl> The actors must constantly fight del Toro's scifi mumbo jumbo to try to convey humanity. Overall, Pacific Rim leaves the impression that its ideas were way to big for one movie, or simply not thought through.