DISNEY+ and TCM
Let's start with news about DISNEY+. The streaming service has been up and going for months now and all I have to show for it is MUPPETS NOW. Six episodes. I got it for all the great new content -- that never came.
Where's that Wanda show? The Scarlet Witch and Vision? Well, we finally got to see the trailer for it if not the actual series. I get that Covid came along. I also get that it came along all over the world but every week I see NETFLIX offering a new series, a new movie, every week. And DISNEY+ launched last November -- it's almost been a year.
NBC's PEACOK launched in July and they keep adding new stuff.
I love Miss Piggy but six episodes of MUPPETS NOW really isn't enough to justify me paying a year's subscription for DISNEY+.
So DEADLINE reports:
Disney Plus’ “Ms. Marvel” series has cast its titular lead.
Newcomer Iman Vellani has been chosen to play Ms. Marvel a.k.a. Pakistani American Kamala Khan, Variety has confirmed with a source close to the project.
The character she will play is a 16-year-old Muslim teenager who lives in Jersey City, New Jersey, and looks up to superheroes like Captain Marvel. According to Marvel, she has an “an Inhuman ability to alter shape and size [and] employs an idealistic attitude as much as any power to make the world a better place.”
Yes, I'd watch that. But, note, they just cast the lead. They aren't filming, who knows how long it's going to be before they start filming.
In another complaint, has TCM ever been as useless as it is lately?
Since they ended their August tributes, they have not aired one movie that I wanted to see. I have not watched one movie in all of September on TCM.
Wednesday, September 30, 2020. SON OF TRUMP: THE DEBATE.
Son of Trump. In the tradition of past sequels like THUNDERHEAD, SON OF FLICKA and THE SON OF MONTE CRISTO and SON OF FRANKENSTEIN, last night a new film was delivered: SON OF TRUMP.
Chris Wallace moderated a debate between US President and GOP nominee Donald Trump and Democratic Party nominee Joe Biden. No others were invited -- not the Green Party's Howie Hawkins, not the SEP's Joseph Kishore, not the PSL's Gloria La Riva and not the Libertarian Party's Jo Jorgensen.
It was just Donald and Joe. Or Donald and Donald Jr. We'll get back to it.
Chris Wallace did not try to fact check. Thank goodness. Big boned Candy Crawley ending her sad career in disgrace as a result of her 'fact checks' which, as she herself admitted on CNN immediately after she completed 'moderating,' were incorrect. The moderator's job is to keep the debate going. It is the job of the candidates on the stage to hold one another accountable. So at least Chris avoided that nonsense.
Donald Trump won the debate.
One of the reasons for that is Chris Wallace. Both candidates interrupted one another throughout the debate, both spoke snide remarks while the other was speaking. Chris, at one point, corrected Donald Trump who then noted Joe was doing the same thing and Chris replied that Donald was doing it more.
A friend who was -- and still is -- planning to vote for Joe said that moment stood out to him (a well known liberal comic). Why? Because it was unfair and reminded him of high school. He was a class clown. He was not the only one. He sat with four others and a high school English teacher would always call him out. It might be any of the other three but she would always single him out. In part, it was because the other three included the superintendent's son. But it wasn't fair.
And Chris Wallace, in that moment, made this anti-Trump ("I hated him with all my heart") feel sorry for Donald Trump.
Fairness is something Americans count on. And that wasn't a fair moment. When Donald said Joe was doing it to, it was up to Chris to call them both out.
And Joe was doing it too.
Which is how we got SON OF TRUMP.
The bar for Joe was never going to be that high. Going into the debate, we all knew Joe was going to lie and the media would look the other way or rush to say it didn't matter. We all knew that the media would ignore Joe's mental issues and they did. On the latter, for example, no one's reporting over Joe, in the debate, confusing Medicare and Medicaid. On the former?
Camille Caldera (USA TODAY) claims to fact check whether or not Joe Biden called US troops "stupid bastards." She concludes:
Based on our research, the claim that former Vice President Joe Biden called the troops "stupid bastards" is missing context. Biden did make the remark in 2016 as part of a call to applaud a fellow soldier. It was a joke, per a spokesperson for his campaign. During the same speech, he praised the troops as the "finest generation of warriors" in the world and thanked them for their "incredible sacrifices."
Camille is missing context and demonstrating that she can't fact check -- either she's an idiot or she's a partisan who can't control her whoring.
In the debate, Donald stated Joe called the troops "stupid bastards." Camille tells you he did but it was supposed to be a joke. What's the liar leaving out?
The most important thing.
Joe didn't keep his mouth shut. Joe responded to Donald that it never happened, that he never said it.
That's the claim that Joe presented. He didn't say, "I was joking." He didn't insist, "I said it but . . ." He said he didn't say it.
That would be lying. Lying Camille, like what you do with your fact check.
That's not fair and, again, when people aren't fair in their treatment of Donald, it helps him.
The media's reputation is in the sewer. And it belongs there. They lied about the Iraq War, they lied for eight years insisting there were no scandals in the Barack Obama administration (Lois Lerner, Eric Holder being in contempt of Congress, Solyndra's half a billion unpaid loan that should never have happened to begin with, etc.). Barack employed the media and their spouses. In Ben Rhodes case (a disgusting piece of filth, Ben Rhodes), the brother of the CBS NEWS president David Rhodes. It was all across the board -- every element of the media. At THE NATION, for example, they let Chris Hayes cover the White House. No. His wife was -- oh, I'm being told that CRAPAPEDIA has scrubbed Chris' entry. To read it, you don't know now that his wife worked for the White House. That's okay, the whores of CRAPAPEDIA are not the final word. We can go to Barack's archived White House pages and grab the information:
President Obama Announces Key Additions to the Office of the White House Counsel
WASHINGTON, DC – Today, President Barack Obama announced more key members of the Office of the White House Counsel, including Deputy Counsels and Special Counsel, Associate Counsels, Deputy Associate Counsels, Research Director, and Staff Assistants and Administrative Assistants. The full list of appointees named today is below.
President Barack Obama said, "The White House Counsel’s office is tasked with making sure that we are operating under the highest standard of ethics and transparency for the American people. Ensuring that we have an open and honest government is one of our top priorities, and this team brings together people of exceptional experience and dedication to public service. I trust they will serve the American people well."
The following announcements were made today:
Deputy Counsels and Special Counsel
Daniel Meltzer
The President has named Daniel Meltzer to be Principal Deputy White House Counsel to the President and Deputy Assistant to the President. Mr. Meltzer is the Story Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the Vice Dean for Physical Planning. He joined the faculty of Harvard Law School in 1982, teaching courses in federal courts, criminal law, and criminal procedure. Prior to his tenure at Harvard, Mr. Meltzer served as Special Assistant to Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, and, after leaving the government, practiced law for three years at Williams & Connolly in Washington, D.C. Earlier, Mr. Meltzer served as a Law Clerk to the Judge Carl McGowan of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and for Justice Potter Stewart of the United States Supreme Court. Mr. Meltzer earned his bachelor’s degree from Harvard College and his J.D. from Harvard Law School, where he served as President of the Harvard Law Review and was awarded the Fay Diploma. From 1988-1992, he served as Associate Counsel, Office of Independent Counsel Lawrence E. Walsh, Iran-Contra Prosecution. He is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and has served as a member of the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States and on the Council of the American Law Institute.
Mary DeRosa
The President has named Mary DeRosa to be Deputy Counsel to the President for National Security Affairs and Legal Adviser to the National Security Council. Ms. DeRosa most recently served as Chief Counsel for National Security to the Senate Judiciary Committee, working for the Chairman, Senator Patrick Leahy. Prior to that, she was a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Earlier, she served on the Clinton Administration National Security Council staff as Special Assistant to the President and Legal Adviser and Deputy Legal Adviser. She has also been Special Counsel to the General Counsel at the Department of Defense and an Associate in the Washington, D.C. and Los Angeles offices of Arnold & Porter. Ms. DeRosa served as a Law Clerk for Judge Richard J. Cardamone of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. She received her bachelor’s degree from the University of Virginia and her J.D. from the George Washington University Law School, where she served as an editor of the George Washington Law Review.
Neal Wolin
The President has named Neal Wolin to be Deputy Counsel to the President for Economic Policy and Deputy Assistant to the President. Mr. Wolin most recently served as the President and Chief Operating Officer for Property and Casualty operations of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. Prior to that, Mr. Wolin worked as Executive Vice President and General Counsel to the Hartford Financial Services Group. Earlier in his career, Mr. Wolin served as the general counsel of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Prior to joining the Treasury Department, Mr. Wolin served in the White House as the executive assistant to National Security Advisor Anthony Lake. Prior to that, Mr. Wolin was the deputy legal adviser of the National Security Council, providing foreign affairs and national security legal advice to the National Security Advisor and the Counsel to the President. Mr. Wolin has also served as special assistant to three directors of Central Intelligence: William H. Webster, Robert M. Gates, and R. James Woolsey. Before joining the federal government, Mr. Wolin practiced law in Washington D.C. with the law firm of Wilmer, Cutler, and Pickering, and as Law Clerk for Judge Eugene H. Nickerson of the Eastern District of New York. Mr. Wolin received a bachelor’s degree from Yale College, a Masters degree from the University of Oxford, and a J.D. from Yale Law School.
Norman L. Eisen
The President has named Norman L. Eisen to be Special Counsel to the President for Ethics and Government Reform. Mr. Eisen most recently served as the Deputy General Counsel to the Transition, where his duties include serving as lead ethics advisor. He will reprise that ethics role in the White House, as well as helping to advance the President's overall government reform agenda. Before joining the Transition, Mr. Eisen was a partner at Zuckerman Spaeder LLP in Washington D.C. acting as outside counsel to governmental clients in a wide array of matters. He also handled white-collar and Congressional investigations during his 17 years at the firm. He is the co-founder of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a progressive government watchdog group. Mr. Eisen received his bachelor’s degree from Brown University and his J.D. from Harvard Law School.
Associate Counsels
Kendall C. Burman
The President has named Kendall C. Burman to be Associate Counsel to the President. Ms. Burman most recently served as Chief Staff Counsel to the Obama for America campaign. Earlier in her career, she served as an Associate at Latham & Watkins, LLP. Ms. Burman received her bachelor's degree from Bowdoin College and her J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School, where she was an editor of the University of Chicago Law Review.
Susan Davies
The President has named Susan Davies to be Associate Counsel to the President. Ms. Davies recently served as General Counsel to the United States Senate Judiciary Committee. Earlier in her career, she served in the Department of Justice in the Antitrust Division, the Office of the Solicitor General, and the Office of Policy Development. Prior to that, Mrs. Davies worked as a litigator at Sidley and Austin in Chicago. Ms. Davies also served as a Law Clerk to Justice Anthony M. Kennedy and Justice Stephen G. Breyer, and as a special counsel to President Bill Clinton. Ms. Davies received her bachelor's degree from Yale University and her J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School, where she was an editor of the University of Chicago Law Review.
Karen Dunn
The President has named Karen Dunn to be Associate Counsel to the President. Ms. Dunn most recently served as Deputy to Chief Strategist David Axelrod on the Obama for America campaign. Prior to that, Ms. Dunn served as a Law Clerk to Justice Stephen Breyer of the Supreme Court of the United States and to Judge Merrick Garland of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Earlier in her career, Ms. Dunn worked for Senate candidate and then-Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton as her press secretary and later as her communications director and a senior adviser. Prior to that, Ms. Dunn served as an aide to Congresswoman Nita M. Lowey. She received her bachelor’s degree from Brown University and her J.D. from Yale Law School.
Danielle Gray
The President has named Danielle C. Gray to be Associate Counsel to the President. Ms. Gray recently served as Deputy Policy Director for Obama for America, focusing on domestic policy as well as law and judicial issues. Prior to this, she was an associate with the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom in New York. Earlier in her career, she served as a Law Clerk to Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court of the United States and to Judge Merrick Garland on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. She also worked on the policy and research staff of the President-elect's 2004 United States Senate campaign. Ms. Gray received her bachelor's degree from Duke University and her J.D. from Harvard Law School, where she served as an editor of the Harvard Law Review.
Michael Gottlieb
The President has named Michael J. Gottlieb to be Associate Counsel to the President. Mr. Gottlieb recently served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the United States Attorney's Office for the Central District of California. Prior to this, he was an associate with the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr. Earlier in his career, he served as a Law Clerk to Justice John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court of the United States and to Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Mr. Gottlieb received his bachelor's degree from Northwestern University and his J.D. from Harvard Law School, where he served as an editor of the Harvard Law Review.
Roberto J. Gonzalez
The President has named Roberto Gonzalez to be Associate Counsel to the President. Mr. Gonzalez recently served as an associate at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP. Earlier in his career, he served as a Law Clerk to Justice John Paul Stevens of the Supreme Court of the United States and a Law Clerk to Judge Guido Calabresi of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Mr. Gonzalez received his bachelor's degree from Duke University and his J.D. from Stanford Law School, where he served as an editor of the Stanford Law Review.
Virginia Canter
The President has named Virginia Canter to be Associate Counsel to the President. Ms. Canter most recently served as Associate Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control at the Department of the Treasury. Earlier in her career, Ms. Canter was Senior Ethics Counsel at the Department of the Treasury, General Counsel of the National Endowment for the Humanities, Associate Counsel to President Clinton, and Assistant Ethics Counsel at the Securities and Exchange Commission. Ms. Canter received both her bachelor’s degree and her J.D. from the University of Baltimore.
Caroline Krass
The President has named Caroline Krass to be Associate Counsel to the President for National Security Affairs. Ms. Krass recently served as Senior Counsel in the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice. Prior to this, she served as Deputy Legal Adviser at the National Security Council. Earlier in her career, she served as a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney in the National Security Section of the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. Ms. Krass also worked as an Attorney Advisor in the Office of Legal Counsel, as the Special Assistant to the General Counsel at the Department of the Treasury, and as an Attorney Advisor at the Department of State. Ms. Krass served as a Law Clerk to Judge Patricia M. Wald of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Ms. Krass received her bachelor’s degree from Stanford University and her J.D. from Yale University, where she served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal.
Jonathan Kravis
The President has named Jonathan Kravis to be Associate Counsel to the President. Mr. Kravis recently served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. Prior to this, he was an associate at Williams & Connolly in Washington, D.C. Earlier in his career, he served as a Law Clerk to Justice Stephen Breyer of the Supreme Court of the United States and to Judge Merrick Garland of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Kravis received his bachelor’s degree from Williams College and his J.D. from Yale Law School, where he served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal.
Trevor Morrison
The President has named Trevor Morrison to be Associate Counsel to the President for National Security Affairs. Mr. Morrison is on leave from Columbia Law School, where he is a Professor of Law. Earlier in his career, he served as a Law Clerk to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the Supreme Court of the United States and to Judge Betty Binns Fletcher of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Mr. Morrison received his bachelor's degree from the University of British Columbia and his J.D. from Columbia Law School.
The President has named Alison J. Nathan to be Associate Counsel to the President. Ms. Nathan was recently the Fritz Alexander Fellow at New York University School of Law and a Visiting Assistant Professor at Fordham Law School. Prior to academia, Ms. Nathan was an associate at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. She served a Law Clerk to Justice John Paul Stevens of the Supreme Court of the United States and Judge Betty B. Fletcher of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. During the 2008 Presidential campaign, Ms. Nathan was the National Voter Protection Senior Advisor to the Obama campaign and a member of the campaign’s LGBT Advisory Committee. Ms. Nathan received her bachelor’s degree from Cornell University and her J.D. from Cornell Law School, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the Cornell Law Review.
Kate Shaw
The President has named Kate Shaw to be Associate Counsel to the President. Ms. Shaw most recently served as an Associate Counsel in the office of the General Counsel to the Transition. Prior to this, Ms. Shaw served as a Law Clerk to Justice John Paul Stevens of the Supreme Court of the United States and to Judge Richard A. Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Ms. Shaw received her bachelor’s degree from Brown University and her J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the Northwestern University Law Review.
And we can stop right there because Kate Shaw is Chris Hayes' wife. January 20, 2009 he was sworn in and eight days later he announces Kate Shaw's in his administration. Which means the transition team had already vetted her. Which means Chris Hayes should not have been allowed cover any White House story or issue for THE NATION. That's not me slamming Chris. I don't think he was swayed by his wife's position. But I shouldn't have to think about it. Even if there's no conflict of interest, the appearance of a conflict of interest was there. That's why NPR, for years and years, would not allow Michele Norris (ALL THINGS CONSIDERED host from 2002 to 2011) to cover various topics because her husband Broderick D. Johnson because of his various positions (in the Clinton administration, in the Obama administration, etc.)
The press repeatedly lied for Barack. Sometimes it was because he screamed and yelled at them -- or his minions did. And sometimes they'd get honest as they retired.
Oh, look, here's ABC NEWS' Ann Compton, retiring in 2014, talking about Barack's tantrums.
Please be clear that while she was the working press, while she was covering the White House for ABC NEWS, she never made these statements. She never reported those facts.
Barack got a free ride. That's the reality.
Barack born in Kenya?
Bob Somerby loves to lie and pretend that Donald Trump started that.
Barack Obama, THREE RIVERS PRESS (TIMES BOOKS, a book imprint of THE NEW YORK TIMES, was the original publisher but we're talking an article by AP when Barack was running for the US Senate and THREE RIVERS PRESS is the publisher that re-issued the book in 2004) and AP started that rumor. Add GOOGLE to it. In 2008, as Americans were beginning to discover Barack -- Hillary had seemed inevitable to many in 2007. In 2008, GOOGLE had some anniversary and allowed people to search old news items. (Later that year they would institute GOOGLE NEWS ARCHIVES which is still up but they no longer maintain.) It was then that the rumors of Barack being born in Kenya really took hold. People found the AP articles, the first ones written about Barack, and he was described as being from Kenya in the article. AP never issued a retraction or correction (to this day).
Did AP lie?
No. Their report may be inaccurate, but they didn't lie. They based that report on the press material for Barack's book DREAMS OF MY FATHER. That material was put out by THREE RIVERS PRESS. That material identified Barack as such.
Author Barack has to approve promotional material that the publisher releases. He was running for the Senate and apparently missed the mistake. But this whole controversy is on Barack and THREE RIVERS PRESS>
It's amazing how we can blame everyone but the press.
It's like with Jean Seberg. How many years online did I have to scream about NEWSWEEK before it finally got added to the record. The lie, when I came online, promoted by FAIR and every Indymedia outlet, was that Joyce Harber ran a blind item about Jean and Jean lost her baby as a result.
It was a lie. That was months prior. Jean went into the hospital when NEWSWEEK magazine ran an item claiming to have interviewed Jean -- they did not -- and telling the world that the child she was carrying was not her husband's -- now that didn't happen, I'm talking about the press, back then, if you were married and pregnant, end of story. Joyce Harber's item didn't mean a thing to Jean. The NEWSWEEK story did. And she and Romain sued NEWSWEEK and won and NEWSWEEK had to print an apology.
Janaury 3, 2006, at this site, I'm discussing Jean Seberg:
The first time I mentioned Jean Seberg a few months ago at The Third Estate Sunday Review a few members wrote to ask if I was sure what I was talking about -- the government spying on an actress? They did their own research and learned that, yes, it was true and that it went way beyond that. Someone asked at one point (the third or fourth time I'd mentioned Seberg) why I brought her up as opposed to others? That's a good question because there are a long list of victims (some who managed to continue their lives and some who weren't as fortunate).
We focus on the press here. And Seberg (Breathless is a good place to start if you never seen one of the films she made) is a solid example, to me anyway, of the problems with the press. Just to recap (and sorry for those who've followed comments at The Third Estate Sunday Review on this topic), Seberg is attacked by two press organs. The FBI wanted to plant a rumor about Seberg. She was an actress and she was also involved in politics. That included the Black Panthers which appeared to be a source of some of the "nervousness" about her (my term). (The reports from that period, clandestine spying by the FBI, the CIA and military intel, focus on any sexual aspect they can to the point that you visualize a bunch of prigs with their noses pressed to a bedroom window. There's a scene in Coming Home where Jane Fonda and Jon Voight are being spied upon and the comments focus on sex which is a good reflection of what the reports focused upon.)
So Seberg's on the enemy list (Nixon's) and she's spied upon. And the FBI floats the idea of planting a rumor that she's pregnant by a Black Panther in order to attempt to destroy her with the oft cited "middle America." At one point J. Edgar Hoover writes a memo saying not to go through with the plan. Either there are memos that were never released or someone elected to
act upon their own. So a blind item pops up in Joyce Haber's gossip column about an actress who's pregnant by a Black Panther. The item is written in such way that it could be any number of actresses (including Jane Fonda -- Seberg was married and living in Paris at the time) except for noting that the actress was filming a musical (that would be Paint Your Wagon).
Haber was the fall guy for that blind item in the eyes of many. But Haber didn't just come across the information. It was fed to her by her editor. Her editor, who claimed later that he couldn't recall anything about the matter, passed it to Haber by Bill Thomas who wrote on the tip that it came from a good source. He couldn't remember anything though when, in the seventies, it was revealed that the FBI had planned to plant a story like that with the press. When it came out in the seventies (as a result of the committees), Thomas struck the pose of "I don't remember." Haber was quite clear that she didn't take planted information from the FBI and, if this was planted information, Thomas was the one who needed to answer for it.
But, big surprise, everyone looked the other way. That shows you the problems with the press (mainstream) right there. But that's only the first example. Apparently the attempts to shock America over an interracial romance weren't completed. There were additional blind items. (And Nixon's staff, Erlichman, Mitchell, etc. received reports from Hoover that they presumably passed on in some form.) But then the "news organ" Newsweek, supposedly not a gossip rag, runs with it as well.
Edward Behr was the author of the piece. His claim is that he included at the end of the article to demonstrate his knowledge of the subject but didn't intend for it to be included. (It being that Seberg was pregnant by an African-American and not her husband, Romain Gary.) Behr may be genuine in his remarks because in his report that section was labeled "strictly FYI." Somehow (or "somehow") this false fact made it into Newsweek. The editor (Kermit Lansner) offered an excuse (my opinion, lame) that he hadn't checked the edition as he usually did because he'd had a scooter accident that day. (Late in the day, by the way. I'm thinking it was three or four o'clock, as Lansner told the story, when he had his scooter mishap.) True or not, the "fact" that Seberg was pregnant by "a black activist" makes it into Newsweek.
I'm sure that was just a coincidence. I'm sure that these coincidences just happen. It just happens that a rumor the FBI was interested in planting gets pushed onto Haber by her editor (Thomas) and it just happens that a false fact labeled "strictly FYI" ends up in Newsweek which did have fact checkers and was aware of the issue of libel. It didn't even run as a rumor, it ran as a fact in an item on Jean Seberg. I'm sure that all of that just magically happened and Nixon and his crowd were just, by magic, getting all the breaks when it came to this false story.
(Yes, that was sarcasm.)
When the Times (New York) ran a story about Jane Fonda and John Kerry in 2004, about the photo (doctored or genuine, I don't remember) people rolled their eyes because one of the claims (false) was that Fonda and Kerry were at another event together (the doctored photo).
Where Jane Fonda was in the early seventies should never be in question because the government recorded her every move. (Kerry was somewhere on the east coast. The undoctored photo was taken by Al Franken's brother, I believe, who immediately noted that the new one featuring Fonda and Kerry onstage together was a fake. To end this out, Fonda was in Los Angeles, as the FBI noted, at a fund raiser -- I believe for the Black Panthers.)
Now maybe the reporter who worked on that story for the Times suffered the same fate that so many did -- we expected would learn about COINTELPRO and other activities in their schooling and they didn't learn of it. Or maybe the reporter was just lazy. I don't know. But, my opinion, the false rumor never should have been floated in the paper in 2004 when it could have easily been dismissed via the government's own records.
I'm off on a tangent where even I've lost my place. But the point here is that Seberg was engaged in lawful activities protected by the Constitution. Those activities made the government nervous so she was (illegally) spied upon. The government floated the idea of creating false rumors about her and planting them with the press. (That happened also with a number of other actors, by the way.) And two large press organs, the Los Angeles Times and Newsweek, just happened to print the items that the FBI was interested in having planted.
Just happened.
It's just a coincidence that the government's smear plan on Seberg makes it into the press.
If you're a trusting soul, I guess. And I guess I'm not. And that's why we don't highlight Newsweek here and why I don't purchase the magazine. Robert Parry has rightly documented serious problems (more than that) at the magazine in the eighties when he worked for it. That should be enough to bother many people. But it didn't start there and if it ended there . . .
This isn't "wild talk." I've not offered my own theories. This is public record. And it was embarrassing for the Los Angeles Times when it came out in the mid-seventies. I don't remember Newsweek being embarrassed. (I don't remember the Times being that embarrassed. If they had been, the Reagan defense of "I don't recall" wouldn't have flown.)
So that's why I focus on Seberg. She was on the enemies list (Nixon's), she was spied on by the government, Nixon received reports on her (via Ehrlichman), the FBI devised a smear campaign to attempt to shock "middle America" and devalue Seberg and that smear campaign appeared in the Los Angeles Times and Newsweek. In terms of Harber's piece, it was a blind item (an obvious one). In terms of Newsweek, the magazine that never prints that an actor is gay or lesbian until they come out, they ran it as fact. And somehow no one thought that this was something worthy of checking out. It's interesting the way Nixon's interests were so well served by the mainstream press with regards to Seberg but, of course, it was all some big coincidence. That's what the story supposedly is. Like the supposed story on Valerie Plame is that the outing just happened without planning on the part of anyone.
We covered it many times after that (here when FAIR was lying).
They lie and they cover for themselves.
And they lied like crazy for Barack which is one of the reasons you ended up with Donald Trump.
They've always lied -- Marilyn Monroe killed herself because she didn't have a job anymore! No, she was already going to return to SOMETHING'S GOT TO GIVE. They lie constantly and the American people are sick of it.
They're lying now.
Joe Biden did not do well.
He had one job: Draw a line between himself and Trump.
All he had to do was appear mature and thoughtful.
Instead, he argued with Trump, he belittled him with insults, he interrupted him.
This is who we replace Trump with? Son of Trump.
Joe was a disaster. He lost.
When they go low, Michelle Obama said, we go high.
Well Joe didn't last night. Joe didn't just step into the gutter, he wallowed in the gutter -- with glee.
"The party is me," he insisted. Then heaven help us all.
Then he claimed that Roe v Wade was on the ballot. Questioned, he insisted, " It's on the ballot in the Court." No, it's settled law. And when Joe claims otherwise, he weakens it. Settled law is settled law. If you support Roe v Wade, that's the argument you make. The majority of adults in the US favor it. The decision was made decades ago. It's settled law. People who argue otherwise aren't arguing law, aren't arguing fact, they're weakening Roe v Wade.
I'm no where near done with this debate. I may do a brief entry tonight, otherwise we'll continue it in tomorrow's snapshot.
Jason Isbell And Amanda Shires: Tiny Desk (Home) Concert
Joe Trump Biden
2 deaths in the music world
Women for Biden
Joe blew the debate
Joe Biden belongs in an assisted living facility
Ronnie Spector?
Fight over the Mediterranean: France’s Proxy War and the Budding Turkish-Russian Alliance
American Foreign Policy: The Problem of Applying the Monroe Doctrine Everywhere
Katie Halper's toxic mascunlity needs to stop
Barack was briefed?
oh, katie halper, i wish i missed it
Gorilla Radio with Chris Cook, Ken Boon September 29, 2020
Punished for Reporting Sexual Harassment: How One Law School Almost Got a Student Survivor Banned From the Bar
How I Made It: Chicano Batman
From DEADLINE:
UPDATED: I’ve learned that A24 will team on the Ronnie Spector film with New Regency. The two partnered previously on the Robert Eggers-directed The Lighthouse, and they are part of the Malcolm & Marie film.
EXCLUSIVE: A24 is putting together a film package that will have Emmy-winning Euphoria star Zendaya attached to play singer Ronnie Spector in a film about her life. Deals have just closed for Spector’s life rights and for Be My Baby, the memoir she wrote with Vince Waldron. I’m hearing that early conversations are happening with Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright Jackie Sibblies Drury to write the script.
So Ronnie Spector?
Back in 2019, I wrote:
A Bee Gees movie?
Honestly, I'd pay to see that. Just for the music, in fact. That includes the songs they wrote and had hits with and the songs they wrote for their brother Andy Gibb. It also includes the songs they wrote for others like Diana Ross ("Chain Reaction," "Experience," "More and More," etc) and for Barbra Streisand ("Guilty," "A Woman In Love").
Andy's death would be part of the movie. Even without that tragedy, there's a ton to work with.
My issue, though?
It is nothing against the Bee Gees. But I do question why we have had a Freddie Mercury film, an Elton John film and now we're about to have a Bee Gees film.
Where's the Diana Ross film?
She's a damn inspiration.
Where's the Aretha Franklin film? Even GIRLS LIKE US appears to have hit a roadblock (the film based on the bestseller about Carly Simon, Joni Mitchell and Carole King).
Where's the Dusty Springfield film?
Grace Slick just turned 80 on Wednesday so where's her film?
Why are we busy doing yet another movie about male performers when we don't ever do them about women?
Help me out here, what was the last theatrical film about a female performer?
There's the Judy Garland film that just came out. Before that what? Diana Ross' Academy Award nominated performance as Billie Holiday in LADY SINGS THE BLUES?
Where's the Doris Day film?
Where's the Mama Cass film?
Women get nothing when it comes to big budget films.
I left out Tina Turner (WHAT'S LOVE GO TO DO WITH IT), other than that, I stand by what I wrote. Is Ronnie supposed to be an inspiration film?
The way I see it, she's got about a year or two of fame and solid recording, then Phil Spector leaves his wife to get with Ronnie and her life goes to hell. There's the wasted seventies. An eighties -- late-to-mid eighties -- hit with Eddie Money where she just sings the chorus to "Be My Little Baby" (his "Take Me Home Tonight") and that's it for the charts.
Do they focus on the abuse from Phil Spector?
I don't get what the point of a Ronnie film is. I like her, I just don't see a film story. I wouldn't see one in Mary Weiss of The Shangri-Las.
Going out with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:''
Tuesday, September 29, 2020. One day till the big debate . . .
I woke up this morning and, while working out, thought, "Oh, I missed the debate last night!" Then, after a moment, I was okay with that. But I didn't miss it, it's tonight. They're calling it a presidential debate. That's not really true.
Donald Trump is the president of the United States. He's not debating, for example, Emanuel Macron -- the president of France. He's debating another person who would like to be president of the United States: Joe Biden.
Another person.
Singular.
There are other people running for that office.
Howie Hawkins, for example, is running on the Green Party ticket, Gloria La Riva is running on the Party for Socialism and Liberation's ticket and Joseph Kishore is running on the Socialist and Equality Party's ticket.
In addition, there's Jo Jorgensen.
For years, the claim has been that limiting the 'debate' to the Republican and Democratic candidates makes sense because they are the only ones who could logically win due to ballot access issues. That is not a valid reason for limiting the debates.
However, in 2020, that 'reasoning' is even more problematic. Jo Jorgensen, the Libertarian Party's presidential candidate, is someone who can be voted on in every state.
'Wait, wait, wait, you can do a write-in in any state.' You can do that but if the name you write-in is not a recognized write-in candidate, your vote may not count depending upon your state's laws. If you write in Bernie Sanders, for example, in Texas, your vote will go to Joe Biden because, in that state, they 'interpret.' If you write in any Democrat -- living or dead -- your vote will go to whomever's the top of the ticket. Rebecca noted that in "why would you write-in bernie sanders?" last week.
Jo Jorgensen can be voted on in every state. She's met the rules and guidelines. She should be on the stage tonight. We should point out that Jo's had it a little bit easier than Howie Hawkins. Both have had to fight to meet the various rules and guidelines -- which differ from state to state. But for Jo, meeting those guidelines was largely the end of it. For Howie?
He's had to meet the guidelines and then face legal challenges from the Democratic Party. They've spent a lot of money keeping him off the ballot. And we call this a democracy? And Democrats often want to chant "Count every vote!" The hypocrisy needs to be called out. We need a better system and we need one that has fairness built in.
Disenfranchising voters is something we on the left love to point out when Republicans do it. Greg Palast, in fact, has built a career out of doing just that. But disenfranchising voters is also keeping candidates off the ballot. And partisan judges -- Democrats -- who go along with these efforts need to be called out and probably removed from office because they're not holding office to promote the Democratic Party, they're holding office to upholds the law.
Why do we allow this to happen? Clearly, the Democratic Party does not value We The People -- two primaries in a row, they've rigged it so Bernie Sanders couldn't get the nomination. Two general elections in a row, they've given us distasteful candidates who don't run on issues. And they don't trust the voter enough to allow choices. There's nothing that Howie Hawkins is offering, issues he's running on, that Joe Biden couldn't co-opt and grab. But Joe doesn't want to run on issues. He is against Medicare For All, he is for destroying the environment (as evidenced by his recent pro-fracking comments). Instead of trying to grab voters from Howie, the Democratic Party uses their energy to keep Howie off the ballot -- the ultimate act of disenfranchisement.
This year's game plan is to keep every left or left leaning candidate for president off the ballot and present only two choices: Joe or Donald -- with Donald being the man the party and their media counterparts have demonized non-stop. They're trying to ensure that you have no choice. And the media is disgusting. Playing games, choosing sides. They want to pretend that they're part of a vibrant democracy but they aren't. They lie for Joe, they fluff for Joe. Anyone watching this, anyone impartial, should be appalled by how the system has been gamed this go round.
B-b-b-but it's different, it's the election of our lifetime!!!!
No, it's really not. And that lie's been used over and over -- in 2004, THE NATION called it the torture election, remember? That's what was on the table. And we'd never be the same and we'd never and we'd never that and blah blah blah.
Some crazys insisted Donald would postpone the election because it was a pandemic. Didn't happen. But I'm seeing a lot of people postponing ethics and truth this cycle to give Joe a 'break' because this is such an important election, so important that facts and standards no longer matter. So we all pretend, for example, that it's okay Jill Biden is campaigning more than her husband. In what world? He's hiding behind her skirts. If he can't campaign for the job, he's not up for it. How pathetic that he hides away and he knows the bulk of the press will go along with it and offer excuses and justifications.
There are no legitimate excuses. He's trying to promote social distancing? Were that the case, his wife wouldn't be on the campaign trail.
And the media won't point that out, they won't do their job. She slaps down Jake Tapper who has a legitimate questions about Joe's 'gaffes' (lies) and says that Donald Trump makes that question moot. No, Jill, he doesn't.
If you're going to lie, I'm going to have to call you out. And I avoided mentioning you the whole time your husband was president (violating that only once for a veterans issue) because I do like you and if I noted you, it was only fair that I criticized you if you were wrong.
Jill, you're wrong.
Joe's running to be president. If he succeeds, Donald is an ex-president. So how are Joe's gaffes (lies) moot? They're not. They go to several important issues and Jake should have pushed back on you. The press should push back on you.
Your husband is allegedly running for president -- apparently, Jill's his legs, the new First Lady Roosevelt -- and that means every question deserves answers. He is answerable to We The People if he wants to be president and it is really shameful to pretend otherwise.
This is just one more election. The country will still be standing after election day. And all the people who've whored and lied better grasp that no one needs them anymore. Norman Solomon, you're a joke. I tried to forgive you but we clearly can't.
You're a little whore who forgot that Lt Ehren Watada was the issue. Not some journalist covering him (I'll leave her name out of it, apparently she didn't ask for Norman's repulsive actions). Instead of supporting Ehren, you chose to publicly insist that he do this or that. In the midst of his Article 32 hearing? While his future hung in the balance? You wanted to put additional pressure on him?
F**k you, Norman, f**k you.
You followed that nonsense with injecting yourself into a couple's relationship and the couple divorced, you know who I mean. To this day, you were the instigator and that is on you.
Then you decided to go PACIFICA RADIO and other stations trashing Hillary Clinton in 2008 -- while failing to inform listeners that you were a supporter of Barack Obama, a pledged delegate. Now you included that in your syndicated columns and you made that disclosure there because you knew that failing to do so could end your syndicated career -- your writings not good enough to justify syndication and you know it.
So you lied to people over and over.
Then you show up in 2019 and you start trashing Elizabeth Warren because that's what you do, what you've always done, when it comes to women. That's who you are, a pig. You were for Bernie!!!! But then you were for Joe. And it wasn't enough to support Joe, you then had to trash third party candidates.
I get it, Norman, not only are you a whore, but you also couldn't write convincingly of Joe Biden. So you instead teamed up with others and start trashing third party candidates. (The previous sentence originally included one name and the question of: "___ why did you send me into a meeting with a CIA recruiter -- a meeting you passed off as an academic meeting." I've long told the story here about how I refused CIA recruitment in college. And I've been very kind by leaving ____'s name blank. As with Saint Beau, people can be put on notice that I'm pretty damn tired of holding my tongue. ____ should get honest about their CIA ties. Or they should retire from public life because I've been about as kind to _____ as I plan to be.)
Norman, you're useless. Your trash and now your trash with an odor that everyone can smell. Clearly, you do not value independent thought or the American people. The 2024 election cycle will be much better without you. A reality that you, and many others, will be forced to face.
Once upon a time, Norman pretended to give a damn about the Iraq War. He used for publicity. These days, he pimps War Hawk Joe Biden. These days, he refuses to demand accountability for the ongoing war.
Not everyone's as cowardly and pathetic as Norman Solomon.
General debate Item 4: Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention
Thank you, President,
We are deeply concerned about the systematic and widespread human rights violations in Iraq. We have raised this issue many times before UN relevant bodies and are still of the firm belief that the situation requires special attention by this Council.
It is appalling that international crimes committed by powerful states against other states are too often erased from humanity’s collective memory and replaced with propaganda to cover up the millions of lives destroyed and extinguished through these crimes. We call attention to the 2003 illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq for which not a single person responsible has been brought to justice. The victims of that heinous war are entitled to the protections of international law and cannot be removed from our collective memory.
Therefore, International-Lawyers and Geneva International Centre for Justice repeat their calls to establish an international, independent Commission of inquiry to investigate all human rights violations in Iraq since 2003 in order to hold all perpetrators accountable.
It is also appalling that the Iraqi government continues to evade calls for accountability for thousands of disappeared persons by branding them as terrorists solely on the basis that they derive from certain ethnic regions in Iraq. Human rights defenders in Iraq are subjected to abductions and assassinations merely for exercising their fundamental rights.
Impunity enables these violations to persist and we repeat our call upon the Council to take all necessary measures to stop these grave violations.
Meanwhile Nahal Toosi, Lara Seligman and Natasha Bertrand (POLITICO) report:
President Donald Trump is weighing closing the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad as intelligence agencies in recent weeks have picked up specific threats against American forces in Iraq, including against the embassy itself, according to three people with knowledge of the intelligence.
Over the past week, senior U.S. officials have told their Iraqi counterparts that they will close the massive, heavily fortified embassy within days unless Iraqi leaders do more to rein in the Iranian-backed militias lobbing rockets at and otherwise threatening the diplomatic outpost, people familiar with the issue said.
It’s not clear how imminent any potential attack might be, or whether it is the driving factor in the administration’s recent push to reduce the number of U.S. troops in Iraq. But the situation bears echoes of another fraught incident: the attack on the U.S. consulate and another facility in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens.
Looking at the same basic details, Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr insists that civil war will break out in Iraq if this issue isn't addressed while an unsigned piece at ALJAZEERA insists that the Iranian government will see it as a sign of impending war with Iran if US diplomats pull out of Iraq.
How will you read the tea leaves?
Lay down your arms
Lay 'em down lay 'em down now
Newsreels rattle the Nazi dread
The able-bodied have shipped away
Molly McGee gets her tea-leaves read
You'll be married in a month they say
"These leaves are crazy!
Look at this town there's no men left!
Just frail old boys and babies
Talking to teacher in the treble clef"
She plants her garden in the spring
She does the winter shovelling
Tokyo Rose on the radio
She says she's leavin' but she don't go
Out of the blue just passin' thru
A young flight sergeant
On two weeks leave
Says "Molly McGee no one else will do!"
And seals the tea-leaf prophecy
Oh these nights are strong and soft
Private passions and secret storms
Nothin' about him ticks her off
And he looks so cute in his uniform
He does the winter shovelling
But summer's just a sneeze
In a long long bad winter cold
She says "I'm leavin' here" but she don't go
"Sleep little darlin'!
This is your happy home
Hiroshima cannot be pardoned!
Don't have kids when you get grown
Because this world is shattered
The wise are mourning
The fools are joking
Oh what does it matter?
The wash needs ironing
And the fire needs stoking"
The three of 'em laughing 'round the radio
They do the winter shovelling
They sit up late and watch the
Johnny Carson show
She says "I'm leavin' here but she don't go
-- "Tea Leaf Prophecy," written by Joni Mitchell, first appears on her CHALKMARK IN A RAINSTORM.
Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "The Set Up" went up last night. The following sites updated:
The Fourth Circle
an important article from dr. margaret flowers
AMAZON's THE BOYS
Joe can't stop lying
Julian Assange and Disgraceful Pelosi
Kim Petersen has a new article
Sick of apologists for corporatist Democrats
We cannot afford Nancy Pelosi
We need better
The latest on Julian
Discredited Russian Bounty Story Exposes Media’s Role in Status Quo
DIVAS Simply Quarantined – Fabulous In Isolation. Jody Watley Joins Sheryl Lee Ralph For A Lively, Fashionable, Honest And Intimate Conversation.
Wi-Fi is Another Way We Can Be Tracked 24/7
Iraqi PM rallies allies to stop US closing embassy after Pompeo threats
Artemis Brings Together An International, Inter-Generational Band Of Women
Egg Prices SKYROCKET: What Is Going On? | Breaking Points
What I won't miss about 2020
RATCHED and that awful Marvin Gaye album
One life ends and another begins, little Lindsay
I support John Lequizamo
She-Hulk and other MARVEL super heroines
The death of SNL
Queen of the Field
More crap coming to NETFLIX
One more time on THE GOLDEN GIRLS
Again on Chadwick
Anna Farris is leaving MOM
Marie Osmond
Chadwick, Latinos on TV and ignored by the Emmys, ...
Joe Jr Third flames out -- thank God


December 5, 2022 - what
What Is 11 Weeks From Today
Hello If you are looking for ? Then, this is the place where you can find some sources that provide…
What Is 5% Of 2000
Hola If you are looking for ? Then, this is the place where you can find some sources that provide…
What Are Wag Bars
What Is The Author’s Purpose In This Excerpt?
What Is The Halo Challenge Tiktok
What Percent Is 15 Out Of 20
Hi If you are looking for ? Then, this is the place where you can find some sources that provide…
What Is 38 As A Fraction
What Does 1012 Mean
What Is 5/9 As A Decimal
What Does It Mean To Turn Someone Out


UUncategorized
World War 3: Russia Promises Something “Worse Than A Nuclear Bomb”
On Saturday, Russian president Vladimir Putin addressed the youth at the XIX World Festival of Youth and Students, which is held in Russia from October 14th to 22nd.
In any issue that one engages in, one should never “forget the moral and ethical pillars,” the Russian president said in his speech in the Russian city of Sochi, reports RT.
Vladimir Putin argued that in the near future genetic programming will open the door to advances in pharmacology and also to modify the genetic code of humans. And this can be “more fearsome than a nuclear bomb.”
“You can practically imagine how a human being can create a human being with specific characteristics,” reflected the president of Russia. “He can be a great mathematician, he can be a great musician, but he can also be a military man, a person who can fight without fear, without compassion or commiseration, without pain, ” he continued.
“And this, what I said now, can be more fearsome than a nuclear bomb,” Putin said. He also stressed that everything we do “should strengthen the person, not destroy it.”
This year the XIX World Festival of Youth and Students is celebrated in Russia, which hosts the event from 14 to 22 October.
The opening of the festival took place in Moscow, while the main activities take place in Sochi from the 15th.
In recent years and with the rapid advance of human genetic engineering there have been growing fears about the possible military applications of this technology and the implications it would have for the world.
In 2014, the United States created the Office of Biological Technologies (BTO) in the Advanced Defense Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which is responsible for developing new technologies for the United States. since 1958, being one of its most important inventions computer networks (Internet and its predecessor ARPANET).
It is believed that the BTO is an office specialized in the development of projects that allow the military use of genetic engineering, something that China would be doing at the same time , facts that have caused great concern worldwide.
World War 3 says:
Why have none of the former US Presidents made sure that North Korea could not amass such an arsenal of nuclear weapons – what was Hilary Clinton doing in office, and Obama, Bush and Clinton?
How could any roque state have built up nuclear weapons sufficient to threaten the entire world, under their noses?
This is a ‘nothing burger’.
Just some speculation about the distant future. But I like Putin. He “gets” what is happening in Western Europe – what Douglas Murray called in his recent book “The Strange Death of Europe”.
He recently gave the example of the rapefugee in Germany who r.ap.ed a young boy, and was released without charge because he said ‘he didn’t realise the young boy didn’t like such a thing done to him”.
He commented;
“A society which cannot protect its children today, has no tomorrow. It has no future”.
World War 3: 93-Year-Old Former President May Be The Last Chance For Peace
With World War 3, President Trump Is Prepared For Anything
Archer Season 12 Episode 7 Release Date In USA, UK, India l Platforms To Watch
Archer season 12 episode 7 release date is a lot trending topic nowadays and a lot of people…
One dead, two injured in car attack in Germany
A man drove into a crowd standing by a bakery in the southwestern German town of Heidelberg on…
Suicide Bombers Target Shi’ite Mosque In Pakistan
A suicide bomber was killed, and another injured after security forces foiled an attempt to strike an Eid…
3 soldiers killed by PKK bomb attack in SE Turkey
Three Turkish soldiers were killed by a roadside bomb attack in southeastern Turkish province of Madrin, Milliyet News…
Bulgaria detains French terrorism suspect
Bulgaria has detained a French citizen suspected of links to terrorism on Paris’s request after he tried to…
US “Mother of All Bombs” Kills 36 ISIS Militants
The Afghan Defense Ministry announced on Friday that the attack on a tunnel complex in remote eastern Afghanistan…


Tech ·Bitcoin
A year into El Salvador’s grand crypto experiment, ‘No one really talks about Bitcoin here anymore’
BYMichael McDonald and Bloomberg
September 3, 2022, 4:19 PM UTC
El Salvador President Nayib Bukele.
El Salvador President Nayib Bukele took the stage last year to fireworks and AC/DC’s “You Shook Me All night Long,” announcing to a cheering crowd of crypto enthusiasts at a beachside confab that Bitcoin would revolutionize his country. It was November, the digital token had just notched new all-time highs and El Salvador was at the very beginning of its experiment as the world’s first nation to use the cryptocurrency as legal tender.
Now, a year into the journey, there are far fewer fireworks. Adoption has moved slowly, and steep declines in Bitcoin’s price from those lofty levels last fall have dampened the early euphoria that swept across the nation. Bitcoin hasn’t replaced El Salvador’s hard currency, the U.S. dollar—it’s not even close—but it also hasn’t brought the financial ruin that some warned of either. Or not yet anyway.
“No one really talks about Bitcoin here anymore. It’s kind of been forgotten,” said former El Salvador central bank chief Carlos Acevedo. “I don’t know if you’d call that a failure, but it certainly hasn’t been a success.”
Bukele captivated the world last year when he made Bitcoin an official currency alongside the dollar, stirring a craze in the cryptocurrency community while also drawing criticism from skeptics, including bond traders and the International Monetary Fund. Bitcoin’s Sept. 7 debut was beset with technical glitches, making for an inauspicious beginning. Undaunted, Bukele — sporting “laser eyes” on his Twitter profile picture — barked back at detractors while welcoming Bitcoin backers and crypto executives to his presidential office, where he continues to host them to this day.
As part of the rollout, Salvadorans were offered government-issued digital wallets preloaded with $30 worth of Bitcoin to help kick things off. Under the law, taxes can be paid in Bitcoin and businesses should accept it as a form of payment, unless they are technologically unable to do so. But the coin’s volatility has spooked users, and cryptocurrency has seen broader acceptance in countries with poor payment networks or strict currency controls, such as Argentina, Venezuela and Cuba, Acevedo said. “In El Salvador we have a good payments network, so why transfer money with cryptocurrency?” he said.
Most Salvadorans haven’t poured large amounts of money into Bitcoin, saving many from the recent bear market, Acevedo said. The same can’t be said of the government itself, which started purchasing the token last year in the run-up to its launch as legal tender and has continued to add to its stockpile, conspicuously “buying the dip” during periods when Bitcoin declined. The result? It’s sitting on losses.
A series of recent surveys found that only a relatively small minority of respondents continue to use digital wallets and few businesses have registered transactions in Bitcoin. And the central bank says only 2% of remittances have been sent via cryptocurrency wallets.
The government is still claiming victory, however. Bitcoin has attracted foreign investment and tourism and increased financial access to a largely unbanked population, according to Finance Minister Alejandro Zelaya. The government says its digital wallet, Chivo, has more than 4 million users. Tourism is on pace to surpass pre-pandemic levels this year and the central bank says 59 cryptocurrency and blockchain companies have registered offices in El Salvador.
Zelaya says the administration still plans to issue a Bitcoin-backed bond, dubbed the “volcano token,” using blockchain technology, though admits recent price declines have hurt sentiment. Advocates say El Salvador is in a position to woo companies in a promising industry and become a hub for financial services in the future, creating high-tech jobs.
“Assuming cars were a failure because after the very first year Ford started production in 1896 no more than 2% of the population had a car would’ve been quite myopic,” said Paolo Ardoino, chief technology officer at Bitfinex. “The government has a long-term vision. The crypto industry is highly technological and that is the type of industry that everyone should want in its country.”
Bitfinex will serve as a trading platform for the volcano bond and will apply for a license to operate in El Salvador once the government passes a digital securities law to underpin the issuance. Canada-based crypto lending and savings company Ledn saw a 678% increase in users in El Salvador over the past year, according to co-founder Mauricio Di Bartolomeo. New-York based AlphaPoint was hired to fix bugs in the Chivo wallet and a series of other companies have also worked on the country’s rollout.
“I don’t see adoption as low. I see a country where everybody has a Bitcoin wallet and everybody knows what Bitcoin is,” Simon Dixon, founder of crypto financial startup Bank to the Future, said during an August visit to El Salvador in which he met Bukele. Bank to the Future is currently hiring people in El Salvador and planning to open an office there, he said. “This is the first time I’ve ever met a government that has a president who has assembled a team that really operates with the urgency and impact of a fast growing company.”
But Bukele’s desire to win over Bitcoiners has come with a downside. The IMF has held off on approving a $1.3 billion program for the country citing risks from Bitcoin. The government’s 2,381 Bitcoin bought with public funds are worth $47.2 million at current prices, less than half what the administration paid for them. Moody’s estimates the government has spent $375 million in total on the rollout, including a $150 million fund to back Bitcoin-dollar conversions and the money for the $30 sign-up bonus given to Chivo users.
“The Bitcoin experiment promoted by the Bukele administration has significantly raised the market’s risk perception of the country,” said Fabiano Borsato, Chief Operating Officer of Torino Capital LLC. “It’s being implemented in a context of fragile public finances, high and persistent fiscal deficits and doubts about the rule of law in the country. This, in our opinion, will prevent El Salvador from accessing financing in the international markets under favorable conditions in the short and medium term.”
Overall, Bukele remains enormously popular among Salvadorans, largely because of his crackdown on gangs, investments in infrastructure and efforts to boost tourism, even as many remain wary of Bitcoin.
A May poll by El Salvador’s Universidad Centroamericana Jose Simieon Canas found that 71.1% respondents said the Bitcoin law did nothing to improve their family finances. Those polled ranked Bitcoin as Bukele’s second-biggest policy failure over the past year behind accelerating inflation.
“If you go to any market in El Salvador, you’re more likely to receive an insult than be able to purchase something in Bitcoin,” said Laura Andrade, director of the university’s public opinion institute, which conducted the poll. “It’s not a part of people’s daily routine.”


General Technology, Quantum Companies
IQM announces new quantum computing breakthrough in Nature
October 4, 2020 by Jeremy G
IQM recently revealed their new breakthrough. Its new high-speed nanoscale radiation detector is now on par with the most powerful quantum computer readers available. The research for the detector was carried out at Aalto University and VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland by many of IQM’s present employees.
Professor Mikko Möttönen’s research group from the university and his collaborators worked together to engineer this quick and ultra-sensitive nanoscale bolometer. It can detect miniscule levels of microwave radiation. The radiation is so weak that heating coffee up at room temperature in a microwave oven by 1°C would have taken 50 septillion times more energy. For reference, that is the number 5 with 25 zeroes behind it.
‘The device is so tiny; it could even fit inside a bacterium.’
Professor Mikko Möttönen, joint Professor of Quantum Technology at Aalto University and VTT, also a Co-Founder of IQM.
This new bolometer will assist in making extremely accurate and quick measurements of the energy of photons. This is important for quantum computers as measuring the energy of qubits is at the heart of quantum algorithms. The device is also easily integrated into superconducting quantum processors due to its small size, making it practical in real-world applications.
‘We started the proof-of-concept using gold-palladium for the bolometer. It worked but at the same time we also figured out how to make it even better. This is where graphene comes in as a replacement. The end result is indeed a much better sensor that can operate at higher speed, so much better that it can be useful in reading out the state of a superconducting qubit, the building block of a superconducting quantum processor.’
M.Sc. Roope Kokkoniemi
This work was a collaborative effort involving Professor Pertti Hakonen’s NANO group at Aalto University and M.Sc. Roope Kokkoniemi, the first author of the Nature paper and IQM’s new member. The NANO group has world-leading expertise in the fabrication of graphene-based devices. The collaboration is indeed the work of tech giants towards a great goal.
This detector technology will be useful in all types and makes of quantum computers, including IQM’s own products. Conventional readers can be replaced and future quantum processors can be scaled up because of the small size of the detector. As IQM is the key figure in Finland’s quantum community, it has the unique position of being able to commercialise its findings through collaborating with the up and coming local quantum ecosystem.
Both authors of the Nature paper on the new bolometer: Roope Kokkoniemi (left) and Kuan Yen Tan (right).
‘We consider this an exciting milestone in the field of quantum technology. IQM is constantly looking for new ways to enhance its quantum-computer technology and this new bolometer certainly fits the bill.’
Dr. Kuan Yen Tan, Co-Founder of IQM who was also involved in the reported research
IQM is a great example of a success story in technology transfer, showing how research can be commercialised in swift fashion. It is now the leading quantum computer company in Europe and reached this status remarkably quickly as well as making its way to sell quantum computers commercially. The company achieved this because not only it managed to recruit many of the talented quantum engineers available, but also because it could collaborate with universities and industry partners across the European continent.
A significant part of IQM’s rapid growth and high level of expertise comes from the close interplay with academia. IQM is actually very integrated in academia, and most of its employees have backgrounds in research. As a whole, they have more than 640 scientific articles published and over 27000 citations.
About IQM
IQM‘s goal is to become a pan-European quantum provider and work with more research teams in all of Europe.
Previous Article How Classic software developers can learn Quantum Computing
Next Article Microsoft unveils Archai Neural Architecture search platform


Hospital De Sant Pau
Photo Credit: David Willinger
Barcelona, Spain | C.1401
Similar to the ever-changing field of medicine, the Hospital De Sant Pau has evolved over the centuries. Rooted in the medieval tradition, the institution’s beginnings date back to 1401 when six Barcelona hospitals merged into one, creating the Hospital de la Santa Creu.
At the time, the Hospital de la Santa Creu was a prime example of Catalan Gothic style, a type of architecture commonly used on civil structures. This style was notorious for its sparse design and the employment of few windows due to reduce high quality of light that poured in from the coast of the Mediterranean Sea.
By the 19th century, healthcare services in Spain were advancing toward scientific medicine and utilizing hygienic principles. As Barcelona continued to grow, so too did the advances in medicine and plans to expand the Hospital came underway. Banker Pau Gil began funding expansion of the structure in 1902. Once completed, the hospital was renamed Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau to honor his legacy.
Designed by famed Catalan modernist architect Lluís Domènech i Montaner, Pau’s new hospital took roughly 28 years to complete. By 1930, it was revered as the most important civil building in the Catalan modernist style. Sadly, Domènech i Montaner had passed away years earlier and never saw his masterpiece come to fruition.
Pau’s Catalan modernist building operated as a fully functioning hospital until 2009, when a new, modern hospital was built next door. Today, the Hospital De Sant Pau is comprised of a modern health complex linked to five independent buildings, and the former structure is used as a museum and cultural center.
Know more? Share with the community!
Create an account to comment! Login/Sign Up.
Blue Pink Turquoise White Interiors Museum
AWA Sites Nearby
Montjuïc Cable Car
Port Vell Aerial Tramway
Renaissance Barcelona Fira
More Places Tagged: White See All >
Chartres, France
Illiers-Combray Station
This French train station is located in a town renamed after the famed writer Marcel Proust's fictional name for the village.
Lukács Baths
Modern thermal baths touted for the healing powers of their waters - just don't forget your bathing suit.
Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
North Mole Light
The North Mole Lighthouse is one of a pair of "twin" lighthouses found at the entrance to Fremantle Harbour in Western Australia.
More Places Tagged: Museum See All >
Funen, Denmark
Egeskov Castle
This floating castle appears to be from an enchanted fable, but in actuality it is Europe's best preserved Renaissance water castle.
Pico Island, Portugal
Museu do Vinho
Surrounded by scenic views and ancient dragon forests, this Portuguese museum is dedicated to the love of wine.
Morgan Library & Museum
The Morgan Library & Museum, once the private office and library of financier J.P. Morgan, is now a museum and scholarly research center in New York City.


"I am a kid playing for his boyhood club - it's a dream come true"
Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall speaks to Becky Ives about a breakthrough season at Leicester after scoring the Foxes' fourth in a comfortable 4-1 victory over Randers in the Europa Conference League.


Race 2B Drug Free Big3 series announced for speedway
Speedway offering additional $75,000 with new deal for three 'Big' races in 2020
The Carlos Vieira Foundation and their Race 2B Drug Free Campaign have joined forces with the Madera Speedway to support the MAVTV-televised Nut Up Pro Late Model Series.
An additional $75,000 will be up for grabs during the Race 2B Drug Free BIG 3 races on March 14, July 25, and October 3.
Both the season opener on March 14 and the Summer Speedfest on July 25 will pay $5,000 to win with $3,000 for second and $2,000 for third. The Short Track Shootout finale on Oct. 3 pays $10,000 to win, $5,000 for second, and $2,500 for third. Each night’s B Main event will also see exciting purse increases, with $1,500 to win followed by $750 for second and $500 for third.
Drivers in the BIG 3 will be competing for a special point fund with $5,000 for the champion, $2,500 for second, and $1,000 for third.
A $10,000 bonus has been offered if any driver can sweep all three races. A $10,000 “Triple Main Challenge” will be offered for the fast-time qualifier. If that driver can win the C Main, B Main, and feature all from the rear of the field they will win the bonus.
An additional $5,000 bonus will be awarded if a driver can sweep all three fast-time awards. Also, $5,000 bonuses have been posted for finishing in the top-three in all three races, leading the most laps in all three BIG 3 races, and a bonus for winning all three B Mains.
“I love the sport of racing and I believe that this sport is a great way to help in deterring some kids and adults from going down the wrong path in their life. Through our foundation and our Race 2B Drug Free Campaign, we are continually supporting ways to help kids stay away from drugs,” Carlos Vieira said.
The Race 2B Drug Free sponsors motivational speakers to visit schools, speaking first-hand about the consequences associated with experimenting with drugs.
The foundation also helps by providing a safe place for kids to go after school. Carlos Vieira Foundation sponsors a free, afterschool boxing and Jujitsu program where kids can positively release aggression and self-threatening behavior. They help youth replace it with learning discipline, camaraderie, and self-wellness.
“By sponsoring the BIG 3 Race Series, we are hoping to support a successful event in which kids and adults can look forward to the sport of racing, which is thrilling and exhilarating but does not involve being out in the streets and getting in trouble,” Vieira said.
“We are passionate about youth in our community and partnering with the Carlos Vieira Foundation to gain more awareness for the Race 2B Drug Free campaign is a great way to bring more people to the Madera Speedway that would otherwise not gain exposure to our sport,” promoter Kenny Shepherd said. “I also see this as a great opportunity for us to use the platform we have with the speedway and our MAVTV show to raise awareness for the campaign. We came up with the three-race series that will create record amounts of prize money available for the drivers while at the same time promoting a great cause.”
All nine races for the Nut Up Pro Late Models are televised on MAVTV as well as the 51FIFTY Jr. Late Model Series. $2,000 will be offered to the Pro Late Model winner on April 4, April 28, May 23, June 27, Aug. 22, and Sept. 19 in addition to the Race 2B Drug Free BIG 3 events.
For information about Madera Racing on MAVTV, visit www.racemadera.com or www.mavtv.com. The Carlos Vieira Foundation is online at www.carlosvieirafoundation.org
Madera Speedway is presented by major partners Nut Up Industries, 51FIFTY Energy Drink, iPull-uPull, and Color Fast Industries. Contingency sponsors include Five Star Bodies, Maita Motorsports, McAllister Precision Marketing, Shenanigan’s Restaurant and StopTech Brakes.
Madera Racing on MAVTV airs Thursdays every week. The show airs at 5 p.m. and 8 p.m. and is also available on the Lucas Oil Racing TV app. The seventh round of the 2019 51FIFTY Jr. Late Model Series airs on Dec. 5.


Learning the state-value function
Unsupervised Learning, Recommenders, Reinforcement Learning
deeplearning.ai
4.9 (762 évaluations)
Cours 3 de 3 dans Apprentissage automatique Spécialisation
In the third course of the Machine Learning Specialization, you will: • Use unsupervised learning techniques for unsupervised learning: including clustering and anomaly detection. • Build recommender systems with a collaborative filtering approach and a content-based deep learning method. • Build a deep reinforcement learning model. The Machine Learning Specialization is a foundational online program created in collaboration between DeepLearning.AI and Stanford Online. In this beginner-friendly program, you will learn the fundamentals of machine learning and how to use these techniques to build real-world AI applications. This Specialization is taught by Andrew Ng, an AI visionary who has led critical research at Stanford University and groundbreaking work at Google Brain, Baidu, and Landing.AI to advance the AI field. This 3-course Specialization is an updated and expanded version of Andrew’s pioneering Machine Learning course, rated 4.9 out of 5 and taken by over 4.8 million learners since it launched in 2012. It provides a broad introduction to modern machine learning, including supervised learning (multiple linear regression, logistic regression, neural networks, and decision trees), unsupervised learning (clustering, dimensionality reduction, recommender systems), and some of the best practices used in Silicon Valley for artificial intelligence and machine learning innovation (evaluating and tuning models, taking a data-centric approach to improving performance, and more.) By the end of this Specialization, you will have mastered key concepts and gained the practical know-how to quickly and powerfully apply machine learning to challenging real-world problems. If you’re looking to break into AI or build a career in machine learning, the new Machine Learning Specialization is the best place to start.
Collaborative Filtering, Unsupervised Learning, Recommender Systems, Reinforcement Learning, Anomaly Detection
It simply exceeded my expectations. I recommend it to whoever who is trying to learn the concepts and need tips related to industry practices, and overall wants an applied approach.
This course is an excellent course for introductory machine learning. All of the topics are covered in great detail and It is an honor to be taught by Andrew N.G, the Great teacher.
This week, you will learn about reinforcement learning, and build a deep Q-learning neural network in order to land a virtual lunar lander on Mars!
Example of continuous state space applications6:24
Lunar lander5:53
Learning the state-value function16:50
Algorithm refinement: Improved neural network architecture3:00
Algorithm refinement: ϵ-greedy policy8:59
Algorithm refinement: Mini-batch and soft updates (optional)11:43
The state of reinforcement learning2:54
Andrew Ng
Eddy Shyu
Curriculum Architect
Aarti Bagul
Curriculum Engineer
Geoff Ladwig
Let's see how we can use reinforcement learning to control the Lunar Lander or for other reinforcement learning problems. The key idea is that we're going to train a neural network to compute or to approximate the state action value function Q of s, a and that in turn will let us pick good actions. Let's see how it works. The heart of the learning algorithm is we're going to train a neural network that inputs the current state and the current action and computes or approximates Q of s, a. In particular, for the Lunar Lander, we're going to take the state s and any action a and put them together. Concretely, the state was that list of eight numbers that we saw previously, so you have xy, x dot, y dot, Theta, Theta dot, and then LR for where the legs are grounded, so that's a list of eight numbers that describe the state. Then finally, we have four possible actions: nothing, left, main, a main engine, and right. We can encode any of those four actions using a one-hot feature vector. If action were the first action, we may encode it using 1, 0, 0, 0 or if it was the second action to find the left cluster, we may encode it as 0, 1, 0, 0. This list of 12 numbers, eight numbers for the state and then four numbers, a one-hot encoding of the action is the inputs we'll have to the neural network, and I'm going to call this X. We'll then take these 12 numbers and feed them to a neural network with say, 64 units in the first hidden layer, 64 units in the second hidden layer, and then a single output in the output layer. The job of the neural network is the output Q of s, a. The state action-value function for the Lunar Lander given the input s and a. Because we'll be using neural network training algorithms in a little bit, I'm also going to refer to this value Q of s, a as the target value Y that were training the neural network to approximate. Notice that I did say reinforcement learning is different from supervised learning, but what we're going to do is not input a state and have it output an action. What we're going to do is input a state action pair and have it try to output Q of s, a, and using a neural network inside the reinforcement learning algorithm this way will turn out to work pretty well. We'll see the details in a little bit so don't worry about it if it doesn't make sense yet. But if you can train a neural network with appropriate choices of parameters in the hidden layers and in the upper layer to give you a good estimates of Q of s, a, then whenever you're Lunar Lander is in some state s, you can then use the neural network to compute Q of s, a. For all four actions, you can compute Q of s, nothing, Q of s, left, Q of s, main, Q of s, right, and then finally, whichever of these has the highest value, you pick the corresponding action a. For example, if out of these four values, Q of s, main is largest, then you would decide to go and fire the main engine of the Lunar Lander. The question becomes, how do you train a neural network to output Q of s, a? It turns out the approach will be to use Bellman's equations to create a training set with lots of examples, x and y, and then we'll use supervised learning exactly as you learned in the second course when we talked about neural networks. To learn using supervised learning, a mapping from x to y, that is a mapping from the state action pair to this target value Q of s, a. But how do you get the training set with values for x and y that you can then train a neural network on? Let's take a look. Here's the Bellman equation, Q of s, a equals R of s plus Gamma, max of a prime, Q of s prime, a prime. The right-hand side is what you want Q of s, a to be equal to, so I'm going to call this value on the right-hand side y and the input to the neural network is a state and an action so I'm going to call that x. The job of the neural network is to input x, that is input the state action pair, and try to accurately predict what will be the value on the right. In supervised learning, we were training a neural network to learn a function f, which depends on a bunch of parameters, W and B, the parameters of the various layers of the neural network and it was the job of the neural network to input x. Hopefully I'll put something close to the target value y. The question is, how can we come up with a training set with values x and y for a new network to learn from. Here's what we're going to do. We're going to use the lunar lander and just try taking different actions in it. If we don't have a good policy yet, we'll take actions randomly, further, left fasser, further, right fasser further, main engine, do nothing. By just trying out different things in the lunar lander simulator we'll observe a lot of examples of when we're in some state and we took some action, may be a good action, maybe a terrible action either way. Then we got some reward R of s for being in that state, and as a result of our action, we got to some new state, S'. As you take different actions in the lunar lander, you see this S, a, R of s, S', and we call them tuples in Python code many times. For example, maybe one time you're in some state S and just to give this an index and we call this S^1, and you happen to take some action a^1, this could be nothing left, main thrusts there or right. As a result of which you've got some reward, and you want up at some state S^'1. Maybe at different times you're in some other state S2, you took some other action, could be good action, could be bad action, could be any of the four actions, and you got the reward, and then you want up with S '2 and so on multiple times. Maybe you've done this 10,000 times or even more than 10,000 times, so you would have to save the way with not just S^1, a^1 and so on, but up to S^10,000, a^10,000. It turns out that each of these tuples will be enough to create a single training example, x^1, y^1. In particular, here's how you do it. There are four elements in this first tuple. The first two will be used to compute x^1, and the second two would be used to compute y^1. In particular, x^1 is just going to be S^1, a^1 put together. S^1 would be eight numbers, the state of the lunar lander, a^1 would be four numbers, the one-hot encoding of whatever action this was and y^1 would be computed using the right-hand side of the Bellman equation. In particular, the Bellman equation says, when you input S^1, a^1, you want Q of S^1, a^1 to be this right hand side, to be equal to R of S^1 plus Gamma max over a' of Q of S^1'a' prime. Notice that these two elements of the tuple on the right give you enough information to compute this. You know what is R of S^1? That's the reward you've saved the way here. Plus the discount factor gamma times max over all actions, a' of Q of S'^1, that's a state you got to in this example, and then take the maximum over all possible actions, a'. I'm going to call this y^1. When you compute this, this will be some number like 12.5 or 17, or 0.5 or some other number. We'll save that number here as y^1, so that this pair x^1, y^1 becomes the first training example in this low dataset we're computing. Now, you may be wondering, where does Q of S', a' or Q of S'^1, a' come from. Well, initially we don't know what is the Q function. But it turns out that when you don't know what is the Q function, you can start off with taking a totally random guess. What is the Q function? We'll see on the next slide that the [inaudible] will work nonetheless. But in every step Q here is just going to be some guess. They'll get better over time it turns out of what is the actual Q function. Let's look at the second example. If you had a second experience where you are in state S^2 to got to a^2, got that reward and then got to that state. Then we would create a second training example in this dataset, x^2, where the input is now S^2, a^2, so the first two elements go to computing the input x, and then y^2 will be equal to R of s^2 plus gamma max of a' Q of S' to a', and whatever this number is, y^2. We put this over here in our small but growing training set, and so on and so forth, until maybe you end up with 10,000 training examples with these x, y pairs. What we'll see later is that we'll actually take this training set where the x's are inputs with 12 features and the y's are just numbers. We'll train a new network with, say, the mean squared error loss to try to predict y as a function of the input x. What I describe here is just one piece of the learning algorithm we'll use. Let's put it all together on the next slide and see how it all comes together into a single algorithm. Let's take a look at what a full algorithm for learning the Q-function is like. First, we're going to take our neural network and initialize all the parameters of the neural network randomly. Initially we have no idea, whether it's a Q function, let's just pick totally random values of the widths. We'll pretend that this neural network is our initial random guess for the Q-function. This is a little bit like when you are training linear regression and you initialize all the parameters randomly and then use gradient descent to improve the parameters. Initializing it randomly for now is fine. What's important is whether the algorithm can slowly improve the parameters to get a better estimate. Next, we will repeatedly do the following; We will take actions in the lunar lander, so float around randomly, take some good actions, take some bad actions. It's okay either way. But you get lots of these tuples of when it was in some state, you took some actually gathering what R of S and you got to some state s prime. What we will do is store to 10,000 most recent examples of these tuples. As you run this algorithm, you will see many steps in the lunar lander, maybe hundreds of thousands of steps. But to make sure we don't end up using excessive computer memory, common practice is to just remember the 10,000 most recent such tuples that we saw taking actions in the MTP. This technique of storing the most recent examples only is sometimes called the replay buffer in reinforcement learning algorithm. For now, we're just flying the lunar lander randomly, sometimes crashing, sometimes not and getting these tuples as experienced for our learning algorithm. Occasionally then we will train the neural network. In order to train the neural network, here's what we'll do. We'll look at these 10,000 most recent tuples we had saved and create a training set of 10,000 examples. Training set needs lots of pairs of x and y. For our training examples, x will be the s, a from this part of the tuple. There'll be a list of 12 numbers, the 8 numbers for the state and the 4 numbers for the one-hot encoding of the action. The target value that we want a neural network to try to predict would be y equals R of S plus Gamma max of a prime, Q of s prime a prime. How do we get this value of Q? Well, initially is this neural network that we had randomly initialized. It may not be a very good guess, but it's a guess. After creating these 10,000 training examples we'll have training examples x1, y1 through x10,000, y10,000. We'll train a neural network and I'm going to call the new neural network Q new, such that Q new of s, a learns to approximate y. This is exactly training that neural network to output f with parameters w and b, to input x to try to approximate the target value y. Now, this neural network should be a slightly better estimates of what the Q function or the state action value function should be. What we'll do is we're going to take Q and set it to this new neural network that we had just learned. Many of the ideas in this algorithm are due to Mnih et al. It turns out that if you run this algorithm where you start with a really random guess of the Q function, then use Bellman's equations to repeatedly try to improve the estimates of the Q function. Then by doing this over and over, taking lots of actions, training a model, that will improve your guess for the Q-function. For the next model you train, you now have a slightly better estimate of what is the Q function. Then the next model you train will be even better. When you update Q equals Q new. Then for the next time you train a model Q of s prime a prime will be an even better estimate. As you run this algorithm on every iteration, Q of s prime, a prime hopefully becomes an even better estimate of the Q function so that when you run the algorithm long enough, this will actually become a pretty good estimate of the true value of Q of s, a, so that you can then use this to pick, hopefully good actions or the MTP. The algorithm you just saw is sometimes called the DQN algorithm which stands for Deep Q-Network because you're using deep learning and neural network to train a model to learn the Q functions. Hence DQN or DQ using a neural network. If you use the algorithm as I described it, it will work, okay, on the lunar lander. Maybe it'll take a long time to converge, maybe it won't land perfectly, but it'll work. But it turns out that with a couple of refinements to the algorithm, it can work much better. In the next few videos, let's take a look at some refinements to the algorithm that you just saw.


News:2008:6:10
Academy grants $500,000 to film and cultural organizations
Jun 10, 2008 by Ian Evans
As we’ve said before, if you think the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is just about the Oscars®, think again. As part of its support of education the Academy Foundation’s Institutional Grants Program has awarded a total of $500,000 to 58 film-related nonprofit organizations — including universities, museums and career development programs — throughout the United States and in Canada.
Since its establishment in 1968, the Foundation, which is the educational wing of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, has distributed more than 573 institutional grants.
“One of our primary goals is to increase access to professional opportunities in the motion picture industry,” said Grants Committee Chair Andrew Marlowe. “These grants also will help generate greater public interest in film events and screenings throughout the U.S.”
The Academy Foundation’s Grants Committee selected the following programs for 2008—2009:
California Institute of the Arts (Valencia)
Columbia University School of the Arts (New York City)
New York University — Kanbar Institute of Film & TV
University of North Carolina (Chapel Hill)
University of Southern California Master of Professional Writing Program
University of Southern California School of Cinematic Arts
Columbia College Hollywood (Tarzana, CA)
North Carolina School of the Arts (Winston-Salem)
New York University Archiving Program
University of California, Los Angeles — Film & Television Program* *
Workplace Hollywood (Hollywood, CA)
Yale University Film Studies
Emerson College (Boston)
Hampshire College (Amherst, MA)
Pennsylvania State University (University Park)
University of North Carolina (Wilmington)
University of the Arts (Philadelphia)
Institutional Grants
FilmAid International (New York City) — African screening program
Facets Multi-Media (Chicago) — Facets Film School and Facets CineChat
Hollywood Cinema Production Resources (Los Angeles) — Job training program
The MacDowell Colony (Peterborough, NH) — Filmmaker residency
Tufts University (Medford, MA) — Filmmaker-in-residence
UCLA Film & Television Archive — Screening series
Whitney Museum of American Art (New York City) — Alice Guy Blache retrospective program
Austin Film Festival, Inc. — Writers’ Ranch and seminar series
Berklee College of Music (Boston) — Visiting artists
California State Summer School for the Arts (Los Angeles) — Visiting artists
Drexel University (Philadelphia) — Visiting filmmakers
Echo Park Film Center (Los Angeles) — Filmmaking workshop and screening programs
Frameline (San Francisco) — Screening series
Harvard Film Archive — Visiting filmmakers
Institute of American Indian Arts (Santa Fe) — Summer film workshop
Media Arts Center San Diego — Screening and workshop programs
Miami Film Society — MIFF Abroad
Museum of Fine Arts, Houston — Visiting filmmakers
New York Women in Film & Television (New York City) — Female filmmakers screening series
Salt Lake City Film Center — Visiting artists
Visual Effects Society (Encino, CA) — Training and mentoring program
Winnipeg Film Group (Manitoba, Canada) — Documentary film conference
Northwest Screenwriters Guild (Seattle) — Visiting speaker series
Bard College (Annandale, NY) — Filmmaking workshop
Cineaste Magazine (New York City) — Film Editing supplement
Cinestory (Idyllwild, CA) — A Film from the Screenwriter’s POV
Columbia College (Chicago) — Artist-in-residence
The Drawing Center (New York City) — Drawing on Film exhibition
Kentucky Film Lab (Lexington) — Filmmakers’ Studio
Niles Essanay Silent Film Museum (Fremont, CA) — Silent film screening series
Ninth Street Independent Film Center (San Francisco) — Canyon Cinema screening series
Outfest (Los Angeles) — Access LA Seminar Series and Screenwriting Lab
Paramount Center for the Arts (Peekskill, NY) — Screening series
San Francisco Cinematheque — Artist-in-residence
Squaw Valley Community of Writers (CA) — Screenwriting workshop
University of Houston — Visiting filmmakers
Walker Art Center (Minneapolis, MN) — Filmmakers in Conversation
University of Colorado at Boulder — Brakhage Symposium
Film Forum (New York City) — Screening series


Snap has confidentially filed for an IPO
That was fast.
By Kurt Wagner Nov 15, 2016, 5:35pm EST
Share All sharing options for: Snap has confidentially filed for an IPO
Scott Olson / Getty Images
Snap, the company previously known as Snapchat, has privately filed documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission for an IPO, according to sources with knowledge of the company’s plans.
This isn’t a surprise. The paperwork has been in the works for months, and these sources say Snap could go public as early as March 2017. The company is targeting a valuation range somewhere between $20 billion and $25 billion, though the official target will be set closer to the IPO date. Reuters was the first to report on Snap’s S-1 filing.
But while it isn’t a surprise the company filed, the whole process was still quick. Very quick, in fact, even if Snapchat doesn’t ultimately go public in spring of 2017. What’s significant here is that the company filed for IPO before its automated ad product has had time to make a significant addition to its business. The API launched just last month. That’s important to note because right now almost all of its revenue comes from hand-cut deals.
That’s been a successful way to do business thus far. Snapchat was targeting $300 million to $350 million in ad revenue this year, and sources say the company will beat that goal easily.
But automating ad sales should significantly boost Snapchat’s bottom line, which is likely why investors are expecting as much as $1 billion in revenue from the company next year. It’s interesting that Snap pulled the trigger on its IPO before giving its API a chance to gain some momentum. If Snapchat wants to provide a serious alternative to Facebook and Google for mobile advertisers, that API, and automating those ad sales, will be key to the equation.
A Snap spokesperson declined to comment.