monology/jigsaw · Datasets at Hugging Face

comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic class label 2 classes	severe_toxic class label 2 classes	obscene class label 2 classes	threat class label 2 classes	insult class label 2 classes	identity_hate class label 2 classes
Marked for deletion Hello. I'm not sure if this is what you are talking about when you say notability, but I have included the PDF that the info comes from I hope this helps. If there is anything else I can do, please let me know. monitorfuse	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
someone else said. So the comment above was dishonest. This excuse is stated 16 days after your threat, after	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
New Research I think this article needs to be updated as per the new research that has come in concerning the DNA of the skull which is very interesting, and the recent ruling out of any known human deformities as the factor for its size and shape by experts.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Yes, I have not made any of these edits!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
That does sound much more challenging than I had thought. What would you suggest as a good topic?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
When the grass is cut...	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Oh, now sources have to come from more than one country. -) I hadn't noticed that requirement before. Is that true of all Wikipedia articles? For example, if there are 10 sources all from the United States (New York Times, Washington Post, San Francicso Chronicle, etc, etc) for a particular point in a given article, Wikipedia editors would insist on a source outside the United States? If so, that's good to know. Sam, one person's obsession is another person's interest. I wouldn't waste your precious time worrying about what other people do or don't find interesting.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
As it stands, you say this posed picture indicates to you that Manning wasn't that frail, and looks smiling and happy. If it is placed here to put the lie to the text and sources about aspects of her past, then it is arguably not neutral, however cute. I wouldn't support having a picture of Kissinger smiling and joking next to text that described him as being in serious wartime negotiations. I'm not saying the picture is objectionable in and of itself, I'm saying (pending a chance for arguments for its inclusion) it makes the article less unarguably neutral. If the picture causes you to say that the text overstates her height issues, health issues, level of childhood happiness etc. then it is arguably not an appropriate image based on the text and sources describing her past. __	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Seems unnecessary. We should start a discussion on merging them.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I think you're is right, but to prevent edit wars, maybe you can post a rewrited version on this talk page to see how people reacts to your changes.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Your edit to 30 Days of Night (film) I've re-added the quote, but I've expanded on information from that particular citation, such as the director saying that Ben Templesmith's illustrations would be reflected in production design, and liking Nelson's draft the best of the three. Does this work better? — (talk • contrib) -	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
asshole. Fuck off.	1true	1true	1true	0false	1true	0false
" Cheers. My adversary probably won't think much of it, though. — (talk) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
"==snesclassics.com and related spam on Wikipedia== 86 article-space edits, 54 articles, 11 warnings, 8 domains, 6 accounts, 3 languages and 1 block prior to today's spamming by 82.38.169.97. Domains: http://www.itsnature.org http://www.translatedarticles.com http://www.sonycarstereos.co.uk http://www.snesclassics.com http://www.homeinteriors.co.uk http://www.celebritygetmeoutofhere.co.uk http://www.bamboo-blinds.org http://www.secretofmana.info Same ownership; may also have been spammed at some point: http://funny-finds.blogspot.com http://www.gaming-memories.com Accounts adding one or more of these links: (talk • contribs • links • count • [/wiki/Special:Log?user= user logs] • [/wiki/Special:Log/?page=User: user page logs] \|\| WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search) (talk • contribs • links • count • [/wiki/Special:Log?user= user logs] • [/wiki/Special:Log/?page=User: user page logs] \|\| WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search) (talk • contribs • links • count • [/wiki/Special:Log?user= user logs] • [/wiki/Special:Log/?page=User: user page logs] \|\| WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search) (talk • contribs • links • count • [/wiki/Special:Log?user= user logs] • [/wiki/Special:Log/?page=User: user page logs] \|\| WHOIS • [http://www.dnsstuff.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Dear Omedon: Although you did the first revert, and then did another one, you accused me of ""edit warring."" That's a personal attack. Why, exactly, aren't you guilty of the same? I'm giving you the victory, but letting you know I believe you should not be an editor because you aren't qualified. Its time for Wikipedia to go pro, fire all the amateur editors, and hire a professional staff, i.e., writers and editors who won't try to whitewash historical villains like Jefferson Davis by referring to him as an ""American"" and deleting any attempt to identify him for what he really was, which was the leading proponent (and a hefty practitioner) of slavery. ArdenHathaway "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I realised that its good use and then reverted my edits to your talk page. see my old edit and revert . I donno what is hinking yet ) as for campa cola i left a message for spammers which should solve problem in long term.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Unspecified source for Image:BP01.gif Thanks for uploading Image:BP01.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I've gone ahead and copied a good bit over, and done some rephrasing and all that jazz. Go and take a look. I would be interested in adding a bit more about the differences with LaVeyan Satanism, such as the social action vs. self-indulgence and belief on atheism. If you don't feel up to adding them in yourself, get me the info somehow, and I'll do it. I can be reached at my Talk Page, or I can be e-mailed from my . TALK CONTRIBS "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
BUT this is exactly what you've done countless times Blanket Rev everything!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" LOL! That's brilliant. Classic pseudoscientific gobbledygook at its best. Thanks for the laugh. Do you have any thoughts about the ""doctrine of signatures"" being a key concept in homeopathy? "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I was hoping that and might have been your edits (they looked medical ). The one about panic and exhaustion, I thought may have been an anecdote, possibly reported somewhere. I'll keep searching for sources. I've copyedited Simon Mitchell a bit and commented at WP:Articles for deletion/Captain Trevor Jackson, calling for a keep on Simon Mitchell. You should comment there when you get a moment to spare. I'll find time later to see if Captain Trevor Jackson has sufficient notability to justify it, but WP:BLP1E may be a problem.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Most of the version you have mentioned has been included now as it is quite well presented and makes the subject coverage wider Len☤ "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
The mute was created for the jaguar.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
IMO, they either have some substance (i.e., the stuff Yuber keeps wanting to chop), or they all become redirects to Spencer.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Done based on your request on your talk page. I've added (and added a , too) in the hope of someone translating the stub of an Italian article and adding it to the one sentence that we have here. More will be needed, but it is already superior to the version I saw claiming Conti to be a former president of Italy. It no longer looks like a hoax. 147.70.242.54	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Dear Sir, Mr. Watson I agree with you completely, I will go back and cite book and page number, and in the documentary the time stamp where the claim is presented regarding Warner Brothers illogical thinking at the time, I have no doubt that today Warner Bros and all of the world respect's and regards Bruce in a much better way than it did in 1973, or in 1978 when Linda Lee's book on her late husband was first published, we have grown closer with more understanding in and less bigotry in the civilised parts of our world. Regards of warmth and respect for a chance to practice my American English grammar and being so kind in my edits out of the sand box. Cathie 谢谢你	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
What this article is sorely lacking is proper statistics to show that the alleged genocide exists only in some people's fevered imaginations	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Regarding edits made during April 20 2007 Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. – "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Seksen the 10,000 turkish-cypriots who were protesting a few months ago (see this) were not protesting against the world (no country imposed any embargoe on North Cyprus). The protests were aimed at Turkey and the imposed austerity measures and the fact that they want to be independent and manage their own affairs. So effectively they feel they're not independent but under occupation (or if you don't like the word, under the ""control"" of Turkey). Back to the issue, the Nicosia article should have the same information/structure as the Cyprus article. In fact the the TRNC (or the occupation for that matter) isn't even mentioned in the Cyprus infobox. That's why North Cyprus exists. We have to be consistent. Otherwise what's the point of having North Nicosia? Lefkoşa Distict should be mentioned there. To me it makes sense for Nicosia to represent the RoC (as it officially does) and North Nicosia to represent the TRNC. You can't have both. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Removal of Image User Abhishek191288 has removed images of the Ranchi Rajdhani Express without a valid reason other than his feelings about my reason for posting the images. Would like others to view the image & comment on it.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Muniz For the second time, I have deleted Kelly B. Muniz from the list. Neither the list nor Google offer any evidence warranting Muniz’s inclusion on the list.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
on the top you say the post be answered but my last 2 posts have not been answered yet. ( )	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
(reply:) okay thank you for your comment.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Administratore: I need your help to stop DIREKTOR and Alasdair. They are fools (look my talk page, please; and I WANT A 2-PAGE LETTER OF APOLOGY FROM DIREKTOR)!!!	0false	0false	0false	0false	1true	0false
It's at User:Bejnar/Faizal Ismail.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Okay, you're right here, but I still think you're wrong about why there should not be a section about Dear in the shooting article. Let's compromise.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
According to [National-Bolshevik Party] the NBPs are not officially branded extremist. Just because you personally feel they are extremist, doesn't give you broad latitude in editing articles accordingly.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Knol - At last! About time Knol came along. I am tired of the nonsense that is published by Wikipedia. Finally the world according to the world, not a bunch of narrow-minded Wikipedia sysops and administrators. 98.195.24.26	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
No I have not ,but will today ,earlier I didn't see this page.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I don't think this qualifies as meatpuppetry - s/he's acting on her/his own advocating for the blocked editor. Canvassing maybe, but not meatpuppetry. · Weigh Anchor · Catacomb	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
kiss my ass you limp dick loser	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	0false
Merge Ulrich Merkel here Since the one assertion made there is made here, I do not see the point of a merge process. Why not simply redirect? if some indepedent content inappropriate to this article is found, it is quite easy to turn the redirect into a now viable article. -	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Tim, I have skimmed through that article, and I must say it's a privilege to even be asked to review it, So thank you very much. Alas, am a bit tied for time at the moment with stuff in the ""real world"" (yes, I think it still exists), so any review I offer will probably be for very tiny spelling mistakes and missing links (if there are even any at all, of course)! I know so little about Bax, that reading it will be a complete education. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Indeed, best to just ignore this, because there's a high chance this will get reported again.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Governors of Tamil Nadu Nicholas, I have been updating List of Governors of Tamil Nadu page for the past few days. Can you please take a look and let me know if it is FL material. Thanks, "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
"I would like to mention that you made the rather blatant sexual and violent yourself so if you want to call the police for sending ""sexually harassing messages"" to yourself, be my guest. My original message (which was, admittedly, not very civil itself and I do apologize) was quite different. It can also be grounds for a block yourself. (I'm also rather amused by this formerly congratulatory comment being removed.) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I concur, our external link policy is indeed harsh, but it is the price to pay to not have 50 EL at the bottom of each article (especially in the IT related articles). Don't worry we all make mistakes and yours was done in good faith, but your edits were against Wikipedia Policy. Don't hesitate to put the helpme tag back if you need anything else! talk "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
"==September 2008== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Your test is here. Shiny!/Oohhh! "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Blotto adrift - admit when you make a mistake. Several other users have pointed out corrections and you still change the pages back to your edits. You and people like you are a shame to wikipedia. ps - if you were a scholar, which your not - but somehow are allowed to edit, again going to the creditablity of this site - you would have access to scholars portal.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Problems with drugs so they went with Nick Stahl instead.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
has about Russian Jewish book peddlers	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
FUCK YOU BARACK OBAMA IS A MUSLIM, HE SUCKS ASS!!!!!!!!! ( )	1true	0false	1true	0false	1true	1true
Look at the freaking image page, and the cited ISBNs. Try google-searching for once in your life. The manga did not start its first English publication in 2004. Gwern (contribs) 19:13 28 January 2012 (GMT)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Nor do my postings indicate that I am anti-social, have gone rogue, or in any other way must be stopped before I do more damage.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Checkuser How the hell do I use a checkuser, help me please . jan→ "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hahaha! Gross, you want to expand the feces portion of the anal sex article? Duuude. Here, let me say it in html: That's gross. Horizontal rules rule. Haha get it?	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Rictus A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Rictus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . - "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Actually, I could not find a block on Adam Carr, nor an an auto-block from using the auto-block locator. Adam, can you try again to edit please? If you still can't edit, then I'm at a loss. Maybe someone else can spot something I am missing. I am posting for you as Clown suggested. \talk	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Wow! You're doing some great work! ) Looking good. I'll continue to work on HNIN. ℥·start "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Why is this so important that wikipeida must publish this mans income for 2005??? Just because a crusading blogger, who works for the Tribune, needs to publish minutia, does not mean it's Encyclopedic in content WP:BLP WP:GRAPEVINE. Why is this information not found on other Northern Illinois office holders?. Why only Roskam's? What value is this information, other than salacious gossip. Any finally why, so vigorously oppose this?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" I'd also agree that ""crackdown"" is not clearly a weaker or milder term than persecutution. http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/07/25/iran.world.protests/ for instance refers to the post-election events in Iran as a crackdown and certainly doesn't seem intended to minimize those events. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Remember the fact that Wikepedia is not a property of Psychotic Terrorist Hindus as well. Control ur Language Man, I can already visualise u when the facts about Terrorist Hindus have already been exposed to the world. This clearly shows the typical mentality of Hindu extremists like u , who do not want to accept the facts And dont try to fool me with those official Copy Pastes of Wiki	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Well, the only edit I did there was to fix a link to a new article I split off, so not sure i can be of much help.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" The content you're adding is promotional in tone, making the article read like an ad. I see nothing valuable about adding where the information desk is; every mall has one except maybe a few really dead ones. Nor do I see any value in listing the bus stops as those usually can't be sourced. Malls are common places for bus stops. and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" The point is that people were too busy finding more critiques towards Wolfowitz than criques towards the Power of Nightmares. Im new to Wiki so I havent had time to sign on and learn the game, but I will soon. I just thought I had to throw in my two cents. I will refrain from using the term you people, if there would be a civil open discussion that doesnt resort to worse ad hominems like ""war monger"" or ""neo fascist"". I have plenty of more links to provide."	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
German Sadchenkov Russian version?))) look that https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2,_%D0%93%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%93%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I list the peer reviewed publications that support the information that the use CRUSIO continues to remove is shown below. The name of the system that was developed in Dr. Timiras lab is called the Automated Imaging Microscope System and not the automated tissue image analysis system, that the user CRUSIO continues to call it. Please refer to the PUBMED publication at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15990721?dopt=AbstractPlus to verify the name in the 4th sentence of the Abstract. Please verify the information related to CREA at the CREA web site http://crea.berkeley.edu/paul_segall_profile.shtml and http://crea.berkeley.edu/crea.shtml. I would be very happy to discuss these references with you and information with you. Estrogen receptor-alpha immunoreactivity in the arcuate hypothalamus of young and middle-aged female mice; Yaghmaie F, Saeed O, Garan SA, Voelker MA, Sternberg H, Timiras PS; Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2010 Feb 16;31(1):15. Age-dependent loss of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor immunoreactive cells in the supraoptic hypothalamus is reduced in calorically restricted mice; Yaghmaie F, Saeed O, Garan SA, Voelker MA, Gouw AM, Freitag W, Sternberg H, Timiras PS.; Neurology & Neurosurgery, Para. 488, Page 99, Sec. 8, Vol 152.2, 2007 Tracking changes in hypothalamic IGF-1 sensitivity with aging and caloric restriction; F. Yaghmaie, O. Saeed, S.A. Garan, A.M. Gouw, P. Jafar, J. Kaur, S. Nijjar, P.S. Timiras, H. Sternberg and M.A. Voelker; Experimental Gerontology, Volume 42, Issues 1-2 , January-February 2007, Pages 11-12. Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor immunoreactive cells are selectively maintained in the paraventricular hypothalamus of calorically restricted mice; Saeed O, Yaghmaie F, Garan SA, Gouw AM, Voelker MA, Sternberg H, Timiras PS.; Int J Dev Neurosci. 2007 Feb;25(1):23-8 Age-dependent loss of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor immunoreactive cells in the supraoptic hypothalamus is reduced in calorically restricted mice; Yaghmaie F, Saeed O, Garan SA, Voelker MA, Gouw AM, Freitag W, Sternberg H, Timiras PS.; Int J Dev Neurosci. 2006 Nov;24(7):431-6. A study of insulin-like growth factor-I receptor immunoreactivity in the supraoptic nucleus of young and old female B6D2F1 mice; Farzin Yaghmaie, Omar Saeed, Steven A. Garan, Arvin M. Gouw, Tien Tran, Jacqueline Ho, Liu Y. Zhao, Mark A. Voelker and Paola S. Timiras; FASEB Journal, April 2006, 357.5 Caloric restriction reduces cell loss and maintains estrogen receptor-alpha immunoreactivity in the pre-optic hypothalamus of female B6D2F1 mice; Yaghmaie F, Saeed O, Garan SA, Freitag W, Timiras PS, Sternberg H; Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2005 Jun;26(3):197-203. A survey of estrogen receptor-alpha immunoreactivity in the hypothalamus of young, old, and old-calorie restricted female B6D2F1 mice; F. Yaghmaie, S.A. Garan, O. Saeed, W. Freitag, P.S. Timiras, H. Sternberg, M. Voelker; Experimental Gerontology, Volume 39, Issues 11-12, November-December 2004, Page 1771 A comparison of estrogen receptor-alpha immunoreactivity in the arcuate hypothalamus of young and middle-aged C57BL6 female mice; Yaghmaie F, Garan SA, Massaro M, Timiras PS; Experimental Gerontology, Volume 38 (2003), Issues 1-2, Page 220 Creating Three-Dimensional Neuronal Maps of the Mouse Hypothalamus Using an Automated Imaging Microscope System; Garan SA, Neudorf J, Tonkin J, McCook LR, Timiras PS.; Experimental Gerontology, Volume 35 numbers 9-10, December 2000, page 1421 Automated Imaging Microscope System; Jason Neudorf and Steven A. Garan; Linux Journal 2000, Issue 70, Februrary, Page 32-35	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I am not well versed on his topic but it appears there was a similar unrest in 18th century I think a good merging is sorely needed here	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" The Silver Devastation A ""{{prod}}"" template has been added to the article The Silver Devastation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 1 Talk/ "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
This is not a forum. If no explanation is given by the writers, then asking the question here is pointless.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Message Is there a way to PM you about an issue involving an editor and sockpuppeting that I noticed? I don't want to start posting my issue here so that they or anyone else can see.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
ANI Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" RE ban As the problems of the original arb case are still ongoing, • Talk • "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Why? I would like to see some explanation of the multi-faceted rationales for this rather statist mandate, rather unprecedented in the technology history of the USA because it allows for absolutely no choice on the part of consumers/users. The introduction cited political, economic issues, there are also military issues perhaps, and the capability of the technology involved all hint at a series of reasons that are not clear in everything I've read on the topic. Am I the only one confused on this issue?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Coloring Could someone color the obstacle diagrams,like in the Sasuke article?1 (talk)(Work)(?) "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Sorry about that tried to revert at same time	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Nunn the gun A tag has been placed on Nunn the gun, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (talk • contribs)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Blocked. Blocked. I was told by the Contact Wikipedia page that one was to either e-mail the administrator who blocked them or contact them on their talk page. While I do not have an IRC channel, I figured contacting here would be the best way. I am the user currently in charge of the IP address 4.249.108.83, which you blocked. I'm not sure why it was blocked, as I've only used Wikipedia to read entries. The only entry I ever edited was one on Air Force One, and that was to change a mistake of the location of Andrews Air Force Base. As for that edit, it is because I live near the base myself and know the area well. If this is the reason for my banning, then I would say you're two years behind schedule. I haven't hurt anyone, and I'm not around the Internet nearly enough to edit any pages, so giving myself my own login wouldn't be necessary. I would appreciate if someone resolved the matter of my blocking, please. Regards, K.I.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
.This page is automatically archived by . Click here for a list of archives	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" And your point regarding the main issue here is what, Binksternet?? I happen to think the opening statement in the lead is too ""busy,"" but if we are going to keep its current structure then ""what it classifies as hate groups"" is fine. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
No, I have three meat puppets vandalizing my careful contributions. That will be reported.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Yeah why dont you do the world a favor and pull your lip over your head... and swallow	1true	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Just discovered that all the articles are being redirect except Alan Shefman's article how do you redirect?	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
hi,idiot, why are you delate my talking, just come out say	1true	0false	0false	0false	1true	0false
Peer Review While a peer review would help, I doubt that the article would pass a GAN. It simply isn't there yet. The unsourced information would definitely be pointed out. I think a more appropriate move would to get it listed into the proper projects and then have it assessed. Then, after that. I think a GAN would be a wonderful move. Speak Page	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I understood the articles to be newspaper reports and as I didn't see them on the page I simply added a very neutral informative sentence. As far as I can see you are not disputing the sentence so why on earth are you hassling me here? You appear to be assuming bad faith where none exists and your comments as such appear to be a direct attack on me. Please leave it there!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
But nobody heard her say that word.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
YES. I understand. YES, YES, YES	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" What do the three edits Feb. 24 have to do with the sock puppetry investigation of COI from 2006 and early 2007? This all seems like a big stretch to formulate a grand conspiracy theory where there isn't any. Editors were aware of the COI back when it happened (years ago) and dealt with it. The article is edited and watched closely now. Are the only recent edits those three attempted additions to the Barack Obama article? Hardly a high crime it seems to me. What you're really upset about is that someone did an unfavorable (but accurate) story about how all attempts to include any mention of controversies or criticisms in the Obama article were reverted. News flash, many of us have had the exact same experience this editor had. If we block users for editing under ""false pretenses"" so be it, but lots of editors post on other sites about their experiences here. This hardly seems like some grand scheme to bring Wikipedia to its knees. This check user investigation, however, and the AfD certainly look like an overeaction that only adds fuel to the fire. Klein said he asked someone to make the edits to see what would happen. He reported on the experience and those he witnessed of other attempts to edit the page that are easily viewed through the history. This hardly seems like something worth making a federal case over. The only mischaracterization is yours: ""under false pretenses to incite a block and, through off-wiki agitation, bring disrepute on the project and trigger a major meltdown on the Obama page."" The fact is the editor in question arranged for an attempt to make a reasonable edit to grotesquely biased article and reported on the experience. That it's not favorable to Wikipedia is certainly cause for reflection and consideration of how we can improve our handling of issues like this in the future. I know when something messed up is noted on another site and people here are made aware of it there's usually an effort to fix it. That happened in this case, but the guardians of the Obama page made sure nothing changed. So be it. If it upsets and embarasses you as it does me, do something to fix it. "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I agree with SH, that sort of 'improvement' should be illegal!	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
Response So I'm sure you're a really nice guy, but it looks like you're adding the tags not because of the the article needing a cleanup and reorganizing but just because the color scheme of the column boxes are not the color scheme of original boxes and are matching the Roc Nation colors and of the logo. That is just plain out bias it not my fault that other people do not do this when creating a record label studio album discography, which they can and you have not seen one with a color scheme on them. All I have done is put the 3 basic colors Black, Red and White of Roc Nation on a original Wikipedia column to distinguish it from other record label albums discography and the other names of the artists that are on the article, because the article would grow as those and more artist release more studio albums and mixtapes, which makes it appropriate and not inappropriate as you have stated for you reason of adding cleanup/reorganize tags. Once again all I did is add 3 basic colors to the original columns Black, Red and White which anybody can do on any other record label discographies on Wikipedia, but I may have been the first to do this new color scheme styling of a record label studio album discography that does not mean you just add tags that are not meant to be on a specific article that is formatted, organized and written like any other record label albums discographies on Wikipedia and is fully verified. There is no Wikipedia rule that says this is not justified for a record label studio album discography except for you , I'm sure you're a really nice guy, but this just plain bias, which Wikipedia does not condone from established editors or administrators.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
haha it is soo funny and thats why im keeping it on the page.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" What does the ""in two weeks"" refer to, Ari? "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" Blocked indef. — • Talk • "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
" ha I thought you knew it was me! i guess logging in would make it more clear, though its not tantamount to brave public speech if i use a name like limpdaddy. anyway, i was not gaming you into 3R block and got one myself after reverting bigdaddys ""clarification"". thanks for the colon advice, I thought there would be someway to do it once per edit. about reverts, not every revert is POV, but for nearly every post/revert pair there will be one party that sees the action as POV. if you're looking for them they are easy to find. re: your editing history, if i'm not mistaken, you continued to remove references to bill maher making jokes about their sexual relations, but leave those about their being ""friends""."	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
"==DJ Sammy== Can I please suggest you read Wikipedia:Five pillars before proceeding further. You need to understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia - NOT a fan site, blog or a ""We love Sammy"" exercise. You are in real danger of having all your edits reverted if you do not comply with some of Wikipedia's basic philosophies. Perhaps the easiest to understand is that this is not the place to put your personal viewpoints (See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view), and that edits are expected to include a cited source (see Wikipedia:Verifiability). Thank you, "	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
(I've already discussed WarriorsPride6565 here and elsewhere.)	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
The word Knave is synonmyous with Jack or Journeyman.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false
I went ahead and shortened the stuff on abortion and euthanasia.	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false	0false

Marked for deletion Hello. I'm not sure if this is what you are talking about when you say notability, but I have included the PDF that the info comes from I hope this helps. If there is anything else I can do, please let me know. monitorfuse

0false

someone else said. So the comment above was dishonest. This excuse is stated 16 days after your threat, after

0false

New Research I think this article needs to be updated as per the new research that has come in concerning the DNA of the skull which is very interesting, and the recent ruling out of any known human deformities as the factor for its size and shape by experts.

0false

Yes, I have not made any of these edits!

0false

That does sound much more challenging than I had thought. What would you suggest as a good topic?

0false

When the grass is cut...

0false

Oh, now sources have to come from more than one country. -) I hadn't noticed that requirement before. Is that true of all Wikipedia articles? For example, if there are 10 sources all from the United States (New York Times, Washington Post, San Francicso Chronicle, etc, etc) for a particular point in a given article, Wikipedia editors would insist on a source outside the United States? If so, that's good to know. Sam, one person's obsession is another person's interest. I wouldn't waste your precious time worrying about what other people do or don't find interesting.

0false

As it stands, you say this posed picture indicates to you that Manning wasn't that frail, and looks smiling and happy. If it is placed here to put the lie to the text and sources about aspects of her past, then it is arguably not neutral, however cute. I wouldn't support having a picture of Kissinger smiling and joking next to text that described him as being in serious wartime negotiations. I'm not saying the picture is objectionable in and of itself, I'm saying (pending a chance for arguments for its inclusion) it makes the article less unarguably neutral. If the picture causes you to say that the text overstates her height issues, health issues, level of childhood happiness etc. then it is arguably not an appropriate image based on the text and sources describing her past. __

0false

Seems unnecessary. We should start a discussion on merging them.

0false

I think you're is right, but to prevent edit wars, maybe you can post a rewrited version on this talk page to see how people reacts to your changes.

0false

Your edit to 30 Days of Night (film) I've re-added the quote, but I've expanded on information from that particular citation, such as the director saying that Ben Templesmith's illustrations would be reflected in production design, and liking Nelson's draft the best of the three. Does this work better? — (talk • contrib) -

0false

asshole. Fuck off.

1true

0false

1true

0false

" Cheers. My adversary probably won't think much of it, though. — (talk) "

0false

"==snesclassics.com and related spam on Wikipedia== 86 article-space edits, 54 articles, 11 warnings, 8 domains, 6 accounts, 3 languages and 1 block prior to today's spamming by 82.38.169.97. Domains: http://www.itsnature.org http://www.translatedarticles.com http://www.sonycarstereos.co.uk http://www.snesclassics.com http://www.homeinteriors.co.uk http://www.celebritygetmeoutofhere.co.uk http://www.bamboo-blinds.org http://www.secretofmana.info Same ownership; may also have been spammed at some point: http://funny-finds.blogspot.com http://www.gaming-memories.com Accounts adding one or more of these links: (talk • contribs • links • count • [/wiki/Special:Log?user= user logs] • [/wiki/Special:Log/?page=User: user page logs] || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search) (talk • contribs • links • count • [/wiki/Special:Log?user= user logs] • [/wiki/Special:Log/?page=User: user page logs] || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search) (talk • contribs • links • count • [/wiki/Special:Log?user= user logs] • [/wiki/Special:Log/?page=User: user page logs] || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • RBLs • tor • search) (talk • contribs • links • count • [/wiki/Special:Log?user= user logs] • [/wiki/Special:Log/?page=User: user page logs] || WHOIS • [http://www.dnsstuff.

0false

" Dear Omedon: Although you did the first revert, and then did another one, you accused me of ""edit warring."" That's a personal attack. Why, exactly, aren't you guilty of the same? I'm giving you the victory, but letting you know I believe you should not be an editor because you aren't qualified. Its time for Wikipedia to go pro, fire all the amateur editors, and hire a professional staff, i.e., writers and editors who won't try to whitewash historical villains like Jefferson Davis by referring to him as an ""American"" and deleting any attempt to identify him for what he really was, which was the leading proponent (and a hefty practitioner) of slavery. ArdenHathaway "

0false

I realised that its good use and then reverted my edits to your talk page. see my old edit and revert . I donno what is hinking yet ) as for campa cola i left a message for spammers which should solve problem in long term.

0false

" Unspecified source for Image:BP01.gif Thanks for uploading Image:BP01.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "

0false

" I've gone ahead and copied a good bit over, and done some rephrasing and all that jazz. Go and take a look. I would be interested in adding a bit more about the differences with LaVeyan Satanism, such as the social action vs. self-indulgence and belief on atheism. If you don't feel up to adding them in yourself, get me the info somehow, and I'll do it. I can be reached at my Talk Page, or I can be e-mailed from my . TALK CONTRIBS "

0false

BUT this is exactly what you've done countless times Blanket Rev everything!

0false

" LOL! That's brilliant. Classic pseudoscientific gobbledygook at its best. Thanks for the laugh. Do you have any thoughts about the ""doctrine of signatures"" being a key concept in homeopathy? "

0false

I was hoping that and might have been your edits (they looked medical ). The one about panic and exhaustion, I thought may have been an anecdote, possibly reported somewhere. I'll keep searching for sources. I've copyedited Simon Mitchell a bit and commented at WP:Articles for deletion/Captain Trevor Jackson, calling for a keep on Simon Mitchell. You should comment there when you get a moment to spare. I'll find time later to see if Captain Trevor Jackson has sufficient notability to justify it, but WP:BLP1E may be a problem.

0false

" Most of the version you have mentioned has been included now as it is quite well presented and makes the subject coverage wider Len☤ "

0false

The mute was created for the jaguar.

0false

IMO, they either have some substance (i.e., the stuff Yuber keeps wanting to chop), or they all become redirects to Spencer.

0false

Done based on your request on your talk page. I've added (and added a , too) in the hope of someone translating the stub of an Italian article and adding it to the one sentence that we have here. More will be needed, but it is already superior to the version I saw claiming Conti to be a former president of Italy. It no longer looks like a hoax. 147.70.242.54

0false

Dear Sir, Mr. Watson I agree with you completely, I will go back and cite book and page number, and in the documentary the time stamp where the claim is presented regarding Warner Brothers illogical thinking at the time, I have no doubt that today Warner Bros and all of the world respect's and regards Bruce in a much better way than it did in 1973, or in 1978 when Linda Lee's book on her late husband was first published, we have grown closer with more understanding in and less bigotry in the civilised parts of our world. Regards of warmth and respect for a chance to practice my American English grammar and being so kind in my edits out of the sand box. Cathie 谢谢你

0false

What this article is sorely lacking is proper statistics to show that the alleged genocide exists only in some people's fevered imaginations

0false

" Regarding edits made during April 20 2007 Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. – "

0false

" Seksen the 10,000 turkish-cypriots who were protesting a few months ago (see this) were not protesting against the world (no country imposed any embargoe on North Cyprus). The protests were aimed at Turkey and the imposed austerity measures and the fact that they want to be independent and manage their own affairs. So effectively they feel they're not independent but under occupation (or if you don't like the word, under the ""control"" of Turkey). Back to the issue, the Nicosia article should have the same information/structure as the Cyprus article. In fact the the TRNC (or the occupation for that matter) isn't even mentioned in the Cyprus infobox. That's why North Cyprus exists. We have to be consistent. Otherwise what's the point of having North Nicosia? Lefkoşa Distict should be mentioned there. To me it makes sense for Nicosia to represent the RoC (as it officially does) and North Nicosia to represent the TRNC. You can't have both. "

0false

Removal of Image User Abhishek191288 has removed images of the Ranchi Rajdhani Express without a valid reason other than his feelings about my reason for posting the images. Would like others to view the image & comment on it.

0false

Muniz For the second time, I have deleted Kelly B. Muniz from the list. Neither the list nor Google offer any evidence warranting Muniz’s inclusion on the list.

0false

on the top you say the post be answered but my last 2 posts have not been answered yet. ( )

0false

(reply:) okay thank you for your comment.

0false

Administratore: I need your help to stop DIREKTOR and Alasdair. They are fools (look my talk page, please; and I WANT A 2-PAGE LETTER OF APOLOGY FROM DIREKTOR)!!!

0false

1true

0false

It's at User:Bejnar/Faizal Ismail.

0false

Okay, you're right here, but I still think you're wrong about why there should not be a section about Dear in the shooting article. Let's compromise.

0false

According to [National-Bolshevik Party] the NBPs are not officially branded extremist. Just because you personally feel they are extremist, doesn't give you broad latitude in editing articles accordingly.

0false

Knol - At last! About time Knol came along. I am tired of the nonsense that is published by Wikipedia. Finally the world according to the world, not a bunch of narrow-minded Wikipedia sysops and administrators. 98.195.24.26

0false

No I have not ,but will today ,earlier I didn't see this page.

0false

I don't think this qualifies as meatpuppetry - s/he's acting on her/his own advocating for the blocked editor. Canvassing maybe, but not meatpuppetry. · Weigh Anchor · Catacomb

0false

kiss my ass you limp dick loser

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

0false

Merge Ulrich Merkel here Since the one assertion made there is made here, I do not see the point of a merge process. Why not simply redirect? if some indepedent content inappropriate to this article is found, it is quite easy to turn the redirect into a now viable article. -

0false

" Tim, I have skimmed through that article, and I must say it's a privilege to even be asked to review it, So thank you very much. Alas, am a bit tied for time at the moment with stuff in the ""real world"" (yes, I think it still exists), so any review I offer will probably be for very tiny spelling mistakes and missing links (if there are even any at all, of course)! I know so little about Bax, that reading it will be a complete education. "

0false

Indeed, best to just ignore this, because there's a high chance this will get reported again.

0false

" Governors of Tamil Nadu Nicholas, I have been updating List of Governors of Tamil Nadu page for the past few days. Can you please take a look and let me know if it is FL material. Thanks, "

0false

"I would like to mention that you made the rather blatant sexual and violent yourself so if you want to call the police for sending ""sexually harassing messages"" to yourself, be my guest. My original message (which was, admittedly, not very civil itself and I do apologize) was quite different. It can also be grounds for a block yourself. (I'm also rather amused by this formerly congratulatory comment being removed.) "

0false

" I concur, our external link policy is indeed harsh, but it is the price to pay to not have 50 EL at the bottom of each article (especially in the IT related articles). Don't worry we all make mistakes and yours was done in good faith, but your edits were against Wikipedia Policy. Don't hesitate to put the helpme tag back if you need anything else! talk "

0false

"==September 2008== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Your test is here. Shiny!/Oohhh! "

0false

Blotto adrift - admit when you make a mistake. Several other users have pointed out corrections and you still change the pages back to your edits. You and people like you are a shame to wikipedia. ps - if you were a scholar, which your not - but somehow are allowed to edit, again going to the creditablity of this site - you would have access to scholars portal.

0false

Problems with drugs so they went with Nick Stahl instead.

0false

has about Russian Jewish book peddlers

0false

FUCK YOU BARACK OBAMA IS A MUSLIM, HE SUCKS ASS!!!!!!!!! ( )

1true

0false

1true

0false

1true

Look at the freaking image page, and the cited ISBNs. Try google-searching for once in your life. The manga did not start its first English publication in 2004. Gwern (contribs) 19:13 28 January 2012 (GMT)

0false

Nor do my postings indicate that I am anti-social, have gone rogue, or in any other way must be stopped before I do more damage.

0false

" Checkuser How the hell do I use a checkuser, help me please . jan→ "

0false

Hahaha! Gross, you want to expand the feces portion of the anal sex article? Duuude. Here, let me say it in html: That's gross. Horizontal rules rule. Haha get it?

1true

0false

" Rictus A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Rictus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . - "

0false

Actually, I could not find a block on Adam Carr, nor an an auto-block from using the auto-block locator. Adam, can you try again to edit please? If you still can't edit, then I'm at a loss. Maybe someone else can spot something I am missing. I am posting for you as Clown suggested. \talk

0false

" Wow! You're doing some great work! ) Looking good. I'll continue to work on HNIN. ℥·start "

0false

Why is this so important that wikipeida must publish this mans income for 2005??? Just because a crusading blogger, who works for the Tribune, needs to publish minutia, does not mean it's Encyclopedic in content WP:BLP WP:GRAPEVINE. Why is this information not found on other Northern Illinois office holders?. Why only Roskam's? What value is this information, other than salacious gossip. Any finally why, so vigorously oppose this?

0false

" I'd also agree that ""crackdown"" is not clearly a weaker or milder term than persecutution. http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/07/25/iran.world.protests/ for instance refers to the post-election events in Iran as a crackdown and certainly doesn't seem intended to minimize those events. "

0false

Remember the fact that Wikepedia is not a property of Psychotic Terrorist Hindus as well. Control ur Language Man, I can already visualise u when the facts about Terrorist Hindus have already been exposed to the world. This clearly shows the typical mentality of Hindu extremists like u , who do not want to accept the facts And dont try to fool me with those official Copy Pastes of Wiki

0false

Well, the only edit I did there was to fix a link to a new article I split off, so not sure i can be of much help.

0false

" The content you're adding is promotional in tone, making the article read like an ad. I see nothing valuable about adding where the information desk is; every mall has one except maybe a few really dead ones. Nor do I see any value in listing the bus stops as those usually can't be sourced. Malls are common places for bus stops. and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) "

0false

" The point is that people were too busy finding more critiques towards Wolfowitz than criques towards the Power of Nightmares. Im new to Wiki so I havent had time to sign on and learn the game, but I will soon. I just thought I had to throw in my two cents. I will refrain from using the term you people, if there would be a civil open discussion that doesnt resort to worse ad hominems like ""war monger"" or ""neo fascist"". I have plenty of more links to provide."

0false

German Sadchenkov Russian version?))) look that https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2,_%D0%93%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%93%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87

0false

I list the peer reviewed publications that support the information that the use CRUSIO continues to remove is shown below. The name of the system that was developed in Dr. Timiras lab is called the Automated Imaging Microscope System and not the automated tissue image analysis system, that the user CRUSIO continues to call it. Please refer to the PUBMED publication at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15990721?dopt=AbstractPlus to verify the name in the 4th sentence of the Abstract. Please verify the information related to CREA at the CREA web site http://crea.berkeley.edu/paul_segall_profile.shtml and http://crea.berkeley.edu/crea.shtml. I would be very happy to discuss these references with you and information with you. Estrogen receptor-alpha immunoreactivity in the arcuate hypothalamus of young and middle-aged female mice; Yaghmaie F, Saeed O, Garan SA, Voelker MA, Sternberg H, Timiras PS; Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2010 Feb 16;31(1):15. Age-dependent loss of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor immunoreactive cells in the supraoptic hypothalamus is reduced in calorically restricted mice; Yaghmaie F, Saeed O, Garan SA, Voelker MA, Gouw AM, Freitag W, Sternberg H, Timiras PS.; Neurology & Neurosurgery, Para. 488, Page 99, Sec. 8, Vol 152.2, 2007 Tracking changes in hypothalamic IGF-1 sensitivity with aging and caloric restriction; F. Yaghmaie, O. Saeed, S.A. Garan, A.M. Gouw, P. Jafar, J. Kaur, S. Nijjar, P.S. Timiras, H. Sternberg and M.A. Voelker; Experimental Gerontology, Volume 42, Issues 1-2 , January-February 2007, Pages 11-12. Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor immunoreactive cells are selectively maintained in the paraventricular hypothalamus of calorically restricted mice; Saeed O, Yaghmaie F, Garan SA, Gouw AM, Voelker MA, Sternberg H, Timiras PS.; Int J Dev Neurosci. 2007 Feb;25(1):23-8 Age-dependent loss of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor immunoreactive cells in the supraoptic hypothalamus is reduced in calorically restricted mice; Yaghmaie F, Saeed O, Garan SA, Voelker MA, Gouw AM, Freitag W, Sternberg H, Timiras PS.; Int J Dev Neurosci. 2006 Nov;24(7):431-6. A study of insulin-like growth factor-I receptor immunoreactivity in the supraoptic nucleus of young and old female B6D2F1 mice; Farzin Yaghmaie, Omar Saeed, Steven A. Garan, Arvin M. Gouw, Tien Tran, Jacqueline Ho, Liu Y. Zhao, Mark A. Voelker and Paola S. Timiras; FASEB Journal, April 2006, 357.5 Caloric restriction reduces cell loss and maintains estrogen receptor-alpha immunoreactivity in the pre-optic hypothalamus of female B6D2F1 mice; Yaghmaie F, Saeed O, Garan SA, Freitag W, Timiras PS, Sternberg H; Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2005 Jun;26(3):197-203. A survey of estrogen receptor-alpha immunoreactivity in the hypothalamus of young, old, and old-calorie restricted female B6D2F1 mice; F. Yaghmaie, S.A. Garan, O. Saeed, W. Freitag, P.S. Timiras, H. Sternberg, M. Voelker; Experimental Gerontology, Volume 39, Issues 11-12, November-December 2004, Page 1771 A comparison of estrogen receptor-alpha immunoreactivity in the arcuate hypothalamus of young and middle-aged C57BL6 female mice; Yaghmaie F, Garan SA, Massaro M, Timiras PS; Experimental Gerontology, Volume 38 (2003), Issues 1-2, Page 220 Creating Three-Dimensional Neuronal Maps of the Mouse Hypothalamus Using an Automated Imaging Microscope System; Garan SA, Neudorf J, Tonkin J, McCook LR, Timiras PS.; Experimental Gerontology, Volume 35 numbers 9-10, December 2000, page 1421 Automated Imaging Microscope System; Jason Neudorf and Steven A. Garan; Linux Journal 2000, Issue 70, Februrary, Page 32-35

0false

I am not well versed on his topic but it appears there was a similar unrest in 18th century I think a good merging is sorely needed here

0false

" The Silver Devastation A ""{{prod}}"" template has been added to the article The Silver Devastation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 1 Talk/ "

0false

This is not a forum. If no explanation is given by the writers, then asking the question here is pointless.

0false

Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi Wikipedia!!Hi

0false

Message Is there a way to PM you about an issue involving an editor and sockpuppeting that I noticed? I don't want to start posting my issue here so that they or anyone else can see.

0false

ANI Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

0false

" RE ban As the problems of the original arb case are still ongoing, • Talk • "

0false

Why? I would like to see some explanation of the multi-faceted rationales for this rather statist mandate, rather unprecedented in the technology history of the USA because it allows for absolutely no choice on the part of consumers/users. The introduction cited political, economic issues, there are also military issues perhaps, and the capability of the technology involved all hint at a series of reasons that are not clear in everything I've read on the topic. Am I the only one confused on this issue?

0false

" Coloring Could someone color the obstacle diagrams,like in the Sasuke article?1 (talk)(Work)(?) "

0false

Sorry about that tried to revert at same time

0false

Nunn the gun A tag has been placed on Nunn the gun, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (talk • contribs)

0false

Blocked. Blocked. I was told by the Contact Wikipedia page that one was to either e-mail the administrator who blocked them or contact them on their talk page. While I do not have an IRC channel, I figured contacting here would be the best way. I am the user currently in charge of the IP address 4.249.108.83, which you blocked. I'm not sure why it was blocked, as I've only used Wikipedia to read entries. The only entry I ever edited was one on Air Force One, and that was to change a mistake of the location of Andrews Air Force Base. As for that edit, it is because I live near the base myself and know the area well. If this is the reason for my banning, then I would say you're two years behind schedule. I haven't hurt anyone, and I'm not around the Internet nearly enough to edit any pages, so giving myself my own login wouldn't be necessary. I would appreciate if someone resolved the matter of my blocking, please. Regards, K.I.

0false

.This page is automatically archived by . Click here for a list of archives

0false

" And your point regarding the main issue here is what, Binksternet?? I happen to think the opening statement in the lead is too ""busy,"" but if we are going to keep its current structure then ""what it classifies as hate groups"" is fine. "

0false

No, I have three meat puppets vandalizing my careful contributions. That will be reported.

0false

Yeah why dont you do the world a favor and pull your lip over your head... and swallow

1true

0false

Just discovered that all the articles are being redirect except Alan Shefman's article how do you redirect?

0false

hi,idiot, why are you delate my talking, just come out say

1true

0false

1true

0false

Peer Review While a peer review would help, I doubt that the article would pass a GAN. It simply isn't there yet. The unsourced information would definitely be pointed out. I think a more appropriate move would to get it listed into the proper projects and then have it assessed. Then, after that. I think a GAN would be a wonderful move. Speak Page

0false

I understood the articles to be newspaper reports and as I didn't see them on the page I simply added a very neutral informative sentence. As far as I can see you are not disputing the sentence so why on earth are you hassling me here? You appear to be assuming bad faith where none exists and your comments as such appear to be a direct attack on me. Please leave it there!

0false

But nobody heard her say that word.

0false

YES. I understand. YES, YES, YES

0false

" What do the three edits Feb. 24 have to do with the sock puppetry investigation of COI from 2006 and early 2007? This all seems like a big stretch to formulate a grand conspiracy theory where there isn't any. Editors were aware of the COI back when it happened (years ago) and dealt with it. The article is edited and watched closely now. Are the only recent edits those three attempted additions to the Barack Obama article? Hardly a high crime it seems to me. What you're really upset about is that someone did an unfavorable (but accurate) story about how all attempts to include any mention of controversies or criticisms in the Obama article were reverted. News flash, many of us have had the exact same experience this editor had. If we block users for editing under ""false pretenses"" so be it, but lots of editors post on other sites about their experiences here. This hardly seems like some grand scheme to bring Wikipedia to its knees. This check user investigation, however, and the AfD certainly look like an overeaction that only adds fuel to the fire. Klein said he asked someone to make the edits to see what would happen. He reported on the experience and those he witnessed of other attempts to edit the page that are easily viewed through the history. This hardly seems like something worth making a federal case over. The only mischaracterization is yours: ""under false pretenses to incite a block and, through off-wiki agitation, bring disrepute on the project and trigger a major meltdown on the Obama page."" The fact is the editor in question arranged for an attempt to make a reasonable edit to grotesquely biased article and reported on the experience. That it's not favorable to Wikipedia is certainly cause for reflection and consideration of how we can improve our handling of issues like this in the future. I know when something messed up is noted on another site and people here are made aware of it there's usually an effort to fix it. That happened in this case, but the guardians of the Obama page made sure nothing changed. So be it. If it upsets and embarasses you as it does me, do something to fix it. "

0false

I agree with SH, that sort of 'improvement' should be illegal!

0false

Response So I'm sure you're a really nice guy, but it looks like you're adding the tags not because of the the article needing a cleanup and reorganizing but just because the color scheme of the column boxes are not the color scheme of original boxes and are matching the Roc Nation colors and of the logo. That is just plain out bias it not my fault that other people do not do this when creating a record label studio album discography, which they can and you have not seen one with a color scheme on them. All I have done is put the 3 basic colors Black, Red and White of Roc Nation on a original Wikipedia column to distinguish it from other record label albums discography and the other names of the artists that are on the article, because the article would grow as those and more artist release more studio albums and mixtapes, which makes it appropriate and not inappropriate as you have stated for you reason of adding cleanup/reorganize tags. Once again all I did is add 3 basic colors to the original columns Black, Red and White which anybody can do on any other record label discographies on Wikipedia, but I may have been the first to do this new color scheme styling of a record label studio album discography that does not mean you just add tags that are not meant to be on a specific article that is formatted, organized and written like any other record label albums discographies on Wikipedia and is fully verified. There is no Wikipedia rule that says this is not justified for a record label studio album discography except for you , I'm sure you're a really nice guy, but this just plain bias, which Wikipedia does not condone from established editors or administrators.

0false

haha it is soo funny and thats why im keeping it on the page.

0false

" What does the ""in two weeks"" refer to, Ari? "

0false

" Blocked indef. — • Talk • "

0false

" ha I thought you knew it was me! i guess logging in would make it more clear, though its not tantamount to brave public speech if i use a name like limpdaddy. anyway, i was not gaming you into 3R block and got one myself after reverting bigdaddys ""clarification"". thanks for the colon advice, I thought there would be someway to do it once per edit. about reverts, not every revert is POV, but for nearly every post/revert pair there will be one party that sees the action as POV. if you're looking for them they are easy to find. re: your editing history, if i'm not mistaken, you continued to remove references to bill maher making jokes about their sexual relations, but leave those about their being ""friends""."

0false

"==DJ Sammy== Can I please suggest you read Wikipedia:Five pillars before proceeding further. You need to understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia - NOT a fan site, blog or a ""We love Sammy"" exercise. You are in real danger of having all your edits reverted if you do not comply with some of Wikipedia's basic philosophies. Perhaps the easiest to understand is that this is not the place to put your personal viewpoints (See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view), and that edits are expected to include a cited source (see Wikipedia:Verifiability). Thank you, "

0false

(I've already discussed WarriorsPride6565 here and elsewhere.)

0false

The word Knave is synonmyous with Jack or Journeyman.

0false

I went ahead and shortened the stuff on abortion and euthanasia.

0false