File size: 5,933 Bytes
c633a0a |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 |
[
{
"id": 0,
"page": 12,
"bounding_box": [
133.72277323404947,
56.89202880859375,
461.55311414930554,
175.64703369140625
],
"latex_content": "\\begin{table}[ht]\n \\centering\n \\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}\n\\hline Step & Operations & Storage (not including storage of $A$) \\\\\n \\hline \\ref{alg2:init} & $O(mn)$ & $O(n)$ \\\\\n \\hline \\ref{alg2:max_arg}& $O(ns-s^2)$ & $O(1)$ \\\\\n \\hline \\ref{alg2:under_diag}& $O(s^2)$ & $O(s^2)$ \\\\\n \\hline \\ref{alg2:above_diag1}& $O(m(ns-s^2))$ & $O(m)$\\\\\n \\hline \\ref{alg2:above_diag2}& $O(s(ns-s^2))$ & $O(ns-s^2)$\\\\\n \\hline \\ref{alg2:above_diag3}& $O(ns-s^2)$ & $O(1)$\\\\\n \\hline Total: & $O(mns) $ & $ O(ns) $\\\\ \\hline\n \\end{tabular}\n \\caption{Computational and storage complexities of Algorithm~\\ref{alg: q-less}.}\n\\end{table}",
"extracted_content": [
[
"Step",
"Operations",
"Storage (not including storage of A)"
],
[
"1",
"O(mn)",
"O(n)"
],
[
"4",
"O(ns s2)\n\u2212",
"O(1)"
],
[
"7",
"O(s2)",
"O(s2)"
],
[
"10",
"O(m(ns s2))\n\u2212",
"O(m)"
],
[
"11",
"O(s(ns s2))\n\u2212",
"O(ns s2)\n\u2212"
],
[
"12",
"O(ns s2)\n\u2212",
"O(1)"
],
[
"Total:",
"O(mns)",
"O(ns)"
]
],
"similarity_score": 0.62,
"table_image": "images/1607.03456v1/table_0.png",
"page_image": "pages/1607.03456v1/page_12.png"
},
{
"id": 1,
"page": 22,
"bounding_box": [
146.58177947998047,
56.89202880859375,
448.69320024762834,
246.67999267578125
],
"latex_content": "\\begin{table}[H]\n\\begin{center}\n \\begin{tabular}{ |c|l|c|c| }\n \\hline\n $\\mu$ & & ICPQR-based DM & $\\mu$IDM~\\cite{Salhov:uIDM2014} \\\\\n \\hline\n \n & Dictionary size $s$ & $1,246$ & $2,305$ \\\\\n$0.1$ & Execution time & $43$ sec. & $7$ hours \\\\\n & Actual distortion & $0.01$ & $0.03$ \\\\\n \\hline\n \n & Dictionary size $s$ & $752$ & $1,293$ \\\\\n$1$ & Execution time & $27$ sec. & $71$ minutes \\\\\n & Actual distortion & $0.23$ & $0.61$ \\\\\n \\hline\n \n & Dictionary size $s$ & $382$ & $630$ \\\\\n$5$ & Execution time & $17$ sec. & $15$ minutes \\\\\n & Actual distortion & $3.91$ & $4.46$ \\\\\n \\hline\n \n & Dictionary size $s$ & $190$ & $284$ \\\\\n$10$ & Execution time & $9$ sec. & $4$ minutes \\\\\n & Actual distortion & $12.81$ & $13.24$ \\\\\n \\hline\n \\end{tabular}\n\\caption{Comparison between ICPQR-based DM and $\\mu$IDM algorithms related to dictionary size, execution time and actual distortion\\protect\\footnotemark, w.r.t. $\\timel{\\map\\Psi}{1}$, for various distortion parameters. Clearly, the actual distortion is bounded by $2\\mu$. Execution times are averaged over $10$ runs of the algorithms.} \\label{tbl:compare_icpqr_idm}\n\\end{center}\n\\end{table}",
"extracted_content": [
[
"\u00b5",
"",
"ICPQR-based DM",
"\u00b5IDM [41]"
],
[
"0.1",
"Dictionary size s\nExecution time\nActual distortion",
"1, 246\n43 sec.\n0.01",
"2, 305\n7 hours\n0.03"
],
[
"1",
"Dictionary size s\nExecution time\nActual distortion",
"752\n27 sec.\n0.23",
"1, 293\n71 minutes\n0.61"
],
[
"5",
"Dictionary size s\nExecution time\nActual distortion",
"382\n17 sec.\n3.91",
"630\n15 minutes\n4.46"
],
[
"10",
"Dictionary size s\nExecution time\nActual distortion",
"190\n9 sec.\n12.81",
"284\n4 minutes\n13.24"
]
],
"similarity_score": 0.3744454303460515,
"table_image": "images/1607.03456v1/table_1.png",
"page_image": "pages/1607.03456v1/page_22.png"
},
{
"id": 2,
"page": 23,
"bounding_box": [
124.92357417515346,
361.218017578125,
470.35142735072543,
450.2840270996094
],
"latex_content": "\\begin{table}[ht]\n \\centering\n \\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}\n \\hline Set & Size & \\# of anomalies & Accuracy [\\%] & False Alarms [\\%] \\\\\n \\hline $\\set T_{mon}$ & $1,321$ & $1$ & $100$ & $0.68$\\\\\n \\hline $\\set T_{tue}$ & $1,140$ & $53$ &$100$ & $0.53$\\\\\n \\hline $\\set T_{wed}$ & $1,321$ & $16$ &$100$ & $0.08$\\\\\n \\hline $\\set T_{thu}$ & $1,320$ & $24$ &$96$ & $1.74$\\\\\n \\hline $\\set T_{fri}$ & $1,320$ & $18$ &$100$ & $0.15$\\\\\n \\hline\n \\end{tabular}\n \\caption{Anomaly detection performances.}\n\\end{table}",
"extracted_content": [
[
"Set",
"Size",
"# of anomalies",
"Accuracy [%]",
"False Alarms [%]"
],
[
"Tmon",
"1, 321",
"1",
"100",
"0.68"
],
[
"Ttue",
"1, 140",
"53",
"100",
"0.53"
],
[
"Twed",
"1, 321",
"16",
"100",
"0.08"
],
[
"Tthu",
"1, 320",
"24",
"96",
"1.74"
],
[
"Tfri",
"1, 320",
"18",
"100",
"0.15"
]
],
"similarity_score": 0.8475452196382429,
"table_image": "images/1607.03456v1/table_2.png",
"page_image": "pages/1607.03456v1/page_23.png"
}
] |