| [ | |
| { | |
| "id": 0, | |
| "page": 4, | |
| "bounding_box": [ | |
| 99.43800354003906, | |
| 121.62852478027344, | |
| 515.7630004882812, | |
| 146.0369873046875 | |
| ], | |
| "latex_content": "\\begin{table}[H]\n \\centering\n \\scriptsize\n \\begin{tabular}{|p{3cm}|p{3cm}|p{4cm}|p{3cm}|}\n \\hline\n \\hline\n \\multicolumn{4}{c}{Details of Experiments for the Employed Data Set}\\\\\n \\cline{1-4}\n \\emph{Domain} & \\emph{Raw Features} & \\emph{Response} & \\emph{Data Set Cardinality}\\\\\n \\hline\n Australian Credit Scoring & 16 & Desired credit approval of individuals based on characteristics & 690\\\\\\hline\n \\end{tabular}\n \\caption{\\small Data set descriptions for the experiments used to validate the efficacy of the proposed algorithm. We summarize here the domain of the application, the input features to the algorithm, the response variable we wish to predict and the number of examples provided in the data.}\n \\end{table}", | |
| "extracted_content": [ | |
| [ | |
| "Domain", | |
| "Raw Features", | |
| "Response", | |
| "Data Set Cardinality" | |
| ], | |
| [ | |
| "Australian Credit Scor-\ning", | |
| "16", | |
| "Desired credit approval of indi-\nviduals based on characteristics", | |
| "690" | |
| ] | |
| ], | |
| "similarity_score": 0.4620253164556962, | |
| "table_image": "images/1405.2377v1/table_0.png", | |
| "page_image": "pages/1405.2377v1/page_4.png" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "id": 1, | |
| "page": 5, | |
| "bounding_box": [ | |
| 121.80699920654297, | |
| 121.62850952148438, | |
| 493.3940124511719, | |
| 170.34600830078125 | |
| ], | |
| "latex_content": "\\begin{table}[H]\n \\centering\n \\scriptsize\n \\begin{tabular}{|p{3cm}|p{2cm}|p{2cm}|p{2cm}|p{2cm}|}\n \\hline\n \\hline\n \\multicolumn{5}{c}{Details of Experiments for the Variable Threshold Algorithm}\\\\\n \\cline{1-5}\n \\emph{Statistic} & \\emph{Average} & \\emph{Minimum} & \\emph{Maximum} & \\emph{Standard Deviation}\\\\\n \\hline\n Predictive Accuracy of Random Forest & {\\vspace{0mm}$85\\%$} & {\\vspace{0mm}$81\\%$} & {\\vspace{0mm}$90\\%$} & {\\vspace{0mm}$3.24\\%$}\\\\\\hline\n Convergence Time of Optimization Algorithm & {\\vspace{0mm}$10$} & {\\vspace{0mm}$7$} & {\\vspace{0mm}$12$} & {\\vspace{0mm}$2.2$}\\\\\\hline\n \\end{tabular}\n \\caption{\\small We present here some relevant statistics related to our experiments in parameter optimization. Notice that in the predictive accuracy criterion, larger values are preferable. By contrast, we have that convergence time is better for smaller values. We define as convergence time the number of iterations of the algorithm that are required to map out completely the known behavior of the accuracy function.}\n \\end{table}", | |
| "extracted_content": [ | |
| [ | |
| "Statistic", | |
| "Average", | |
| "Minimum", | |
| "Maximum", | |
| "Standard Devi-\nation" | |
| ], | |
| [ | |
| "Predictive Accuracy of\nRandom Forest", | |
| "85%", | |
| "81%", | |
| "90%", | |
| "3.24%" | |
| ], | |
| [ | |
| "Convergence Time of\nOptimization Algorithm", | |
| "10", | |
| "7", | |
| "12", | |
| "2.2" | |
| ] | |
| ], | |
| "similarity_score": 0.3839611178614824, | |
| "table_image": "images/1405.2377v1/table_1.png", | |
| "page_image": "pages/1405.2377v1/page_5.png" | |
| } | |
| ] |