premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Richard is outstanding. | contradiction |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Kayla is not massive. | neutral |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Amos is outstanding. | entailment |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Hunter is not unable. | contradiction |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Amos is not tall. | contradiction |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Richard is annoyed. | contradiction |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Amos is loyal. | entailment |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Sean is not tall. | self_contradiction |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Kayla is not outstanding. | neutral |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Sean is not loyal. | neutral |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Baldwin is tall. | entailment |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Richard is not unable. | self_contradiction |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Sean is unable. | self_contradiction |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Richard is unable. | self_contradiction |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Sean is not unable. | self_contradiction |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Adrian is tall. | entailment |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Baldwin is loyal. | neutral |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Richard is not massive. | contradiction |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Amos is not massive. | entailment |
Sean is not annoyed.
Amos is outstanding.
Adrian is tall.
Sean is not unable.
Amos is loyal.
Sean is massive.
Baldwin is annoyed.
Adrian is not unable.
Sean is tall.
Richard is unable.
Kayla is not tall.
Baldwin is tall.If someone is tall and not massive, then he is loyal, and vice versa.
If someone is both not outstanding and not annoyed, then he is unable.
If Kayla is not massive, then Kayla is unable and Amos is annoyed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both unable and not annoyed, then Amos is not loyal.
If Adrian is outstanding, then Amos is not massive and Richard is tall.
If Hunter is loyal, then Richard is not unable.
Someone who is not annoyed is always both not outstanding and massive.
Adrian being tall and Amos being outstanding are equivalent to Hunter being unable and Richard being not annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is loyal, then Hunter is massive and Richard is not unable.
Someone who is both tall and not outstanding is always unable.
If everyone is not outstanding, then Kayla is not tall.
If there is someone who is massive, then Sean is not tall. | Kayla is not loyal. | neutral |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Amery is not popular. | entailment |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Hall is not helpful. | neutral |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Kingsley is popular. | neutral |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Hall is not popular. | self_contradiction |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Hall is popular. | self_contradiction |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Kendrick is not popular. | self_contradiction |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Kingsley is not wooden. | self_contradiction |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Amery is popular. | contradiction |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Austin is not happy. | entailment |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Kingsley is wooden. | self_contradiction |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Stewart is not popular. | contradiction |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Hall is competitive. | contradiction |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Clive is wooden. | contradiction |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Hall is not competitive. | entailment |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Amery is not talented. | neutral |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Hall is talented. | contradiction |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Hall is not talented. | entailment |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Clive is talented. | neutral |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Amery is not competitive. | entailment |
Kingsley is wooden.
Austin is not happy.
Austin is not competitive.
Amery is happy.
Clive is not wooden.
Kendrick is not popular.
Austin is popular.
Kendrick is wooden.
Stewart is popular.
Hall is popular.
Clive is helpful.
Amery is not competitive.If there is at least one people who is competitive or not happy, then Stewart is helpful.
Someone who is eithor talented or not wooden is always not competitive.
If Amery is not popular and Kendrick is not helpful, then Austin is wooden.
If all people are talented, then Austin is helpful.
If someone is competitive, then he is both popular and not talented.
If someone is not competitive and happy, then he is not popular, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Kendrick is talented once knowing that Kingsley is not helpful.
Someone who is both not popular and competitive is always not happy.
Austin is not competitive if and only if Hall is not talented.
Amery being happy is equivalent to Kendrick being popular.
If there is at least one people who is not competitive, then Kingsley is not wooden and Austin is talented.
If someone is not talented, then he is both happy and not competitive. | Hall is wooden. | neutral |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Brooke is nice. | neutral |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Brooke is not alive. | entailment |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Alexander is not curious. | entailment |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Mark is not emotional. | self_contradiction |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Hamlin is alive. | neutral |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Hamlin is nice. | neutral |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Mark is not long. | contradiction |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Alexander is not long. | self_contradiction |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Mark is alive. | self_contradiction |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Hamlin is not emotional. | contradiction |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Mark is breakable. | neutral |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Alexander is not breakable. | contradiction |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Mark is curious. | contradiction |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Matthew is not breakable. | neutral |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Alexander is not nice. | entailment |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Goddard is not long. | contradiction |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Goddard is long. | entailment |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Chalmers is not curious. | entailment |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Mark is emotional. | self_contradiction |
Brooke is not alive.
Hamlin is not long.
Chalmers is emotional.
Chalmers is nice.
Hamlin is emotional.
Mark is alive.
Mark is long.
Alexander is long.
Chalmers is not curious.
Goddard is long.
Alexander is not nice.
Matthew is not nice.If there is at least one people who is both not alive and not emotional, then Chalmers is long.
If Chalmers is not alive and Brooke is not emotional, then Brooke is curious.
Someone is long and not nice if and only if he is breakable.
It can be concluded that Alexander is alive once knowing that Mark is long or Brooke is not nice.
Someone being both not emotional and not curious is equivalent to being alive.
Mark being not long is equivalent to Goddard being not emotional and Hamlin being nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or not emotional, then Mark is not curious and Alexander is not alive.
It can be concluded that Alexander is not long once knowing that Alexander is not alive and Matthew is not nice.
If someone is not long or not curious, then he is emotional.
If there is nobody who is not not nice, then Matthew is not long.
All not emotional people are not alive.
If there is someone who is both not long and nice, then Mark is not emotional and Matthew is not curious. | Alexander is emotional. | self_contradiction |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Lee is not cooperative. | entailment |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Lee is dark. | entailment |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Gemma is useful. | self_contradiction |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Roswell is cooperative. | neutral |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Kathryn is tough. | contradiction |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Roswell is useful. | neutral |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Gemma is cooperative. | entailment |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Solomon is useful. | self_contradiction |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Kathryn is cooperative. | entailment |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Solomon is not political. | self_contradiction |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Gemma is not tough. | contradiction |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Solomon is tough. | neutral |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Lee is cooperative. | contradiction |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Kathryn is not cooperative. | contradiction |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Gemma is not dark. | entailment |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Boris is tough. | contradiction |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Arvel is useful. | self_contradiction |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Kathryn is useful. | neutral |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Gemma is not useful. | self_contradiction |
Kathryn is cooperative.
Gemma is useful.
Gemma is not political.
Gemma is tough.
Kathryn is not tough.
Lee is dark.
Lee is not cooperative.
Solomon is not useful.
Gemma is not practical.
Solomon is practical.
Lee is practical.
Boris is not tough.Kathryn being cooperative or Solomon being political implies that Solomon is not dark.
If everyone is practical, then Roswell is useful and Roswell is not political.
If there is at least one people who is both not practical and not tough, then Arvel is not political.
Someone who is not dark is always not practical.
If someone is either not practical or not dark, then he is useful and political.
Someone is not political if and only if he is useful.
It can be concluded that Roswell is tough and Roswell is practical once knowing that Lee is useful.
Solomon being dark and Gemma being useful imply that Arvel is not practical.
Someone being both cooperative and not dark is equivalent to being tough and political.
If there is someone who is dark, then Arvel is not useful.
Someone is not useful if and only if he is not practical.
Kathryn being not dark implies that Solomon is tough. | Boris is practical. | neutral |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Philbert is not enchanting. | self_contradiction |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Kathryn is plucky. | contradiction |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Orlando is naughty. | entailment |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Kathryn is enchanting. | contradiction |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Richard is not plucky. | self_contradiction |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Quillan is serious. | neutral |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Kent is not enchanting. | entailment |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Kathryn is serious. | contradiction |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Kent is plucky. | contradiction |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Quillan is not naughty. | self_contradiction |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Richard is not naughty. | contradiction |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Richard is naughty. | entailment |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Kent is not serious. | entailment |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Quillan is naughty. | self_contradiction |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Roland is smoggy. | neutral |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Quillan is plucky. | self_contradiction |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Roland is not plucky. | neutral |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Quillan is not smoggy. | neutral |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Orlando is smoggy. | neutral |
Quillan is not plucky.
Richard is not enchanting.
Roland is humble.
Philbert is enchanting.
Quillan is not humble.
Richard is plucky.
Quillan is not naughty.
Kent is not serious.
Richard is smoggy.
Orlando is not humble.
Philbert is not serious.
Kathryn is not enchanting.Roland being enchanting is equivalent to Quillan being smoggy.
Kent being humble and Richard being not naughty imply that Richard is enchanting.
If all people are not naughty, then Quillan is not serious and Orlando is plucky.
Someone who is not plucky or serious is always naughty and not humble.
If someone is not plucky and not serious, then he is not enchanting, and vice versa.
Quillan being smoggy and Orlando being naughty imply that Orlando is humble.
If there is someone who is either smoggy or not humble, then Orlando is not serious.
It can be concluded that Quillan is plucky once knowing that Philbert is not enchanting and Philbert is not serious.
If someone is enchanting and not serious, then he is smoggy, and vice versa.
All not smoggy people are not naughty.
It can be concluded that Quillan is not naughty and Richard is not humble once knowing that Richard is not serious.
Someone who is not serious is always not plucky. | Kathryn is not plucky. | entailment |