premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Fred is not wrong. | entailment |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Quimby is not available. | contradiction |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Konrad is not shiny. | neutral |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Della is not available. | self_contradiction |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Morris is not available. | contradiction |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Della is messy. | self_contradiction |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Fred is wrong. | contradiction |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Rex is ambitious. | self_contradiction |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Della is famous. | entailment |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Hunter is ambitious. | entailment |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Morris is available. | entailment |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Hunter is not wrong. | contradiction |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Rex is shiny. | neutral |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Konrad is not ambitious. | self_contradiction |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Hunter is shiny. | contradiction |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Hunter is not shiny. | entailment |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Quimby is not shiny. | neutral |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Konrad is available. | self_contradiction |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Morris is not shiny. | neutral |
Della is not available.
Fred is not wrong.
Della is messy.
Hunter is ambitious.
Morris is famous.
Rex is messy.
Konrad is ambitious.
Rex is not ambitious.
Hunter is not shiny.
Rex is not famous.
Rex is not available.
Morris is ambitious.Quimby being not messy implies that Fred is not shiny and Della is available.
If someone is shiny or not available, then he is ambitious.
If there is at least one people who is ambitious or not messy, then Quimby is available.
Someone who is eithor shiny or not ambitious is always available.
Della being available or Quimby being shiny implies that Morris is ambitious.
If there is someone who is both ambitious and famous, then Fred is not wrong.
If someone is famous and not wrong, then he is both not ambitious and not available, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not shiny or messy, then Konrad is not available and Konrad is not famous.
All not messy people are not ambitious.
If there is someone who is not available, then Della is messy.
Someone who is eithor famous or not available is always not messy.
If Hunter is wrong, then Morris is available, and vice versa. | Fred is not shiny. | neutral |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Bowen is accurate. | entailment |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Mila is not lucky. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Mila is not clear. | entailment |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Albion is not wild. | contradiction |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Albion is accurate. | entailment |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Mila is not selfish. | contradiction |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Ives is not wild. | neutral |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Albion is not lucky. | neutral |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Bowen is wild. | entailment |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Mila is not blue. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Ives is not accurate. | neutral |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Bowen is lucky. | contradiction |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Mila is blue. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Anabelle is selfish. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Anabelle is not lucky. | entailment |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Anabelle is not blue. | neutral |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Albion is not blue. | neutral |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Isabel is blue. | contradiction |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Isabel is wild. | contradiction |
Mila is not clear.
Anabelle is not wild.
Isabel is not blue.
Isabel is not wild.
Anabelle is not selfish.
Mila is lucky.
Anabelle is not lucky.
Maribel is not wild.
Albion is wild.
Ives is lucky.
Albion is accurate.
Bowen is accurate.If there is nobody who is not selfish, then Isabel is not wild.
Someone is not blue and not accurate if and only if he is not lucky and clear.
If there is at least one people who is not accurate, then Maribel is blue.
If there is at least one people who is accurate, then Bowen is blue and Bowen is wild.
Someone being both accurate and selfish is equivalent to being not lucky.
If Ives is not blue, then Isabel is accurate, and vice versa.
If someone is not clear or he is not accurate, then he is not blue.
If all people are not blue or selfish, then Anabelle is accurate.
If Anabelle is wild, then Anabelle is accurate.
Someone who is eithor not selfish or blue is always not lucky.
If someone is both selfish and not clear, then he is not wild.
If someone is not clear, then he is blue. | Anabelle is not selfish. | self_contradiction |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Alastair is not wet. | entailment |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Della is not wet. | self_contradiction |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Herbert is united. | self_contradiction |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Ross is not messy. | contradiction |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Ross is not united. | contradiction |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Herbert is not united. | self_contradiction |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Claude is not selfish. | neutral |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Ross is not selfish. | contradiction |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Della is plastic. | entailment |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Herbert is not mean. | contradiction |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Alvin is united. | contradiction |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Alvin is mean. | neutral |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Alvin is messy. | entailment |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Herbert is messy. | neutral |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Claude is messy. | self_contradiction |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Alvin is not plastic. | neutral |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Tyler is wet. | neutral |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Ross is selfish. | entailment |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Alastair is mean. | self_contradiction |
Della is plastic.
Alastair is not mean.
Della is not mean.
Della is not selfish.
Herbert is mean.
Tyler is not messy.
Herbert is united.
Della is not wet.
Claude is not messy.
Alastair is not selfish.
Ross is messy.
Ross is united.Someone is mean and messy if and only if he is selfish and plastic.
If Ross is united, then Alvin is messy and Herbert is not plastic, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is plastic, then Ross is selfish and Alvin is not united.
If Alvin is wet and Alvin is mean, then Claude is messy.
Alvin being not mean and Ross being messy are equivalent to Tyler being wet and Alastair being not united.
If there is someone who is either not selfish or messy, then Alastair is mean.
Someone being plastic is equivalent to being wet.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is not selfish and Alastair is not wet.
If Tyler is plastic and Alvin is not messy, then Herbert is not mean.
Someone who is mean is always not united.
If there is someone who is not plastic, then Alastair is united.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or wet, then Claude is messy. | Della is not mean. | entailment |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Ian is not mellow. | entailment |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Tobias is entire. | neutral |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Igor is not mellow. | entailment |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Igor is mellow. | contradiction |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Norris is conscientious. | self_contradiction |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Norris is not conscientious. | self_contradiction |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Norris is not realistic. | entailment |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Luna is entire. | neutral |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Irvin is not conscientious. | contradiction |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Ian is conscientious. | self_contradiction |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Norris is bright. | contradiction |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Irvin is not bright. | neutral |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Ian is not conscientious. | self_contradiction |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Ian is bright. | self_contradiction |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Luna is mellow. | neutral |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Igor is bright. | entailment |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Ian is vivacious. | contradiction |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Tobias is not vivacious. | contradiction |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Igor is not vivacious. | neutral |
Norris is not realistic.
Norris is not conscientious.
Irvin is realistic.
Tobias is vivacious.
Irvin is conscientious.
Ian is not conscientious.
Ian is not vivacious.
Ian is bright.
Timothy is entire.
Ian is entire.
Timothy is not mellow.
Igor is bright.If someone is both conscientious and bright, then he is not mellow.
Someone who is eithor not conscientious or not vivacious is always not bright.
Someone being entire is equivalent to being conscientious.
Someone being both not entire and mellow is equivalent to being not conscientious and vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not entire, then Timothy is realistic.
Timothy being bright implies that Irvin is not conscientious.
If someone is not entire and vivacious, then he is both not bright and realistic, and vice versa.
If Ian is mellow and Igor is not conscientious, then Timothy is vivacious.
If there is at least one people who is not realistic, then Norris is not bright.
Someone who is realistic and bright is always not entire and not vivacious.
Ian is entire if and only if Igor is not mellow.
If someone is not realistic, then he is conscientious. | Timothy is not mellow. | entailment |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Ted is massive. | neutral |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Guy is not joyous. | neutral |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Harley is massive. | entailment |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Ted is basic. | contradiction |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Otis is not massive. | contradiction |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Ted is not joyous. | self_contradiction |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Ted is light. | self_contradiction |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Otis is not guilty. | neutral |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Gardner is massive. | contradiction |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Gardner is not basic. | entailment |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Ted is not basic. | entailment |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Tobias is joyous. | self_contradiction |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Carlton is guilty. | neutral |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Ted is wooden. | neutral |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Otis is wooden. | self_contradiction |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Tobias is not massive. | entailment |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Ted is guilty. | contradiction |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Gardner is basic. | contradiction |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Guy is not wooden. | entailment |
Guy is not wooden.
Tobias is not massive.
Tobias is not joyous.
Gardner is not massive.
Ted is not guilty.
Harley is massive.
Ted is not basic.
Harley is guilty.
Harley is joyous.
Otis is not joyous.
Tobias is not guilty.
Otis is wooden.Gardner being not joyous implies that Ted is not light.
Someone who is eithor light or wooden is always joyous.
Someone is not basic if and only if he is light.
It can be concluded that Otis is not basic once knowing that Tobias is wooden and Harley is massive.
If someone is light, then he is not joyous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either not wooden or basic, then Otis is massive and Ted is not light.
If there is someone who is both basic and massive, then Otis is wooden and Ted is not joyous.
Someone who is both massive and not joyous is always not wooden.
Gardner is not basic if and only if Otis is wooden.
If Gardner is not massive, then Tobias is not guilty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is light, then Ted is not guilty.
If there is at least one people who is both massive and basic, then Carlton is light. | Ted is joyous. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits