premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Glen is helpful. | entailment |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Brian is nice. | self_contradiction |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Carroll is not brown. | entailment |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Calvin is not nice. | self_contradiction |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Abraham is nice. | neutral |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Abraham is not entire. | neutral |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Lambert is not nice. | contradiction |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Abraham is not nice. | neutral |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Abraham is nice. | neutral |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Calvin is not entire. | entailment |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Calvin is nice. | self_contradiction |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Glen is pink. | contradiction |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Glen is nice. | contradiction |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Glen is not pink. | entailment |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Glen is not entire. | self_contradiction |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Kurt is not nice. | entailment |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Glen is entire. | self_contradiction |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Carroll is brown. | contradiction |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Lambert is not helpful. | contradiction |
Glen is helpful.
Brian is not nice.
Kurt is not nice.
Calvin is nice.
Lambert is helpful.
Glen is not pink.
Carroll is not brown.
Calvin is not pink.
Brian is nice.
Carroll is not nice.
Lambert is nice.
Glen is not entire.If someone is entire, then he is brown, and vice versa.
If Carroll is not brown, then Carroll is not entire and Lambert is helpful.
If there is at least one people who is either helpful or brown, then Glen is entire and Brian is not pink.
As long as someone is entire and nice, he is nice and helpful.
If someone is not nice or pink, then he is not entire.
If everyone is brown, then Brian is not helpful.
If Lambert is not entire or Brian is not nice, then Abraham is helpful.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not pink and Lambert is brown once knowing that Lambert is not nice.
If someone who is not nice is also not entire, then he is not nice.
If someone is brown and nice, then he is both nice and not helpful, and vice versa.
Someone being not nice is equivalent to being not pink.
Kurt being not nice and Lambert being not entire imply that Abraham is pink. | Abraham is not brown. | neutral |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Konrad is mellow. | entailment |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Konrad is not tan. | entailment |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Royce is tan. | entailment |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Nathalie is not mellow. | entailment |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Konrad is not terrible. | self_contradiction |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Nathalie is mellow. | contradiction |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Royce is not good-tempered. | contradiction |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Lombard is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Nathalie is tan. | self_contradiction |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Royce is not tan. | contradiction |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Ryan is good-tempered. | contradiction |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Royce is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Theobold is not tan. | neutral |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Royce is not helpful. | self_contradiction |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Lombard is tan. | entailment |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Theobold is not mellow. | neutral |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Theobold is helpful. | neutral |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Royce is every. | neutral |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Lombard is terrible. | neutral |
Ryan is not good-tempered.
Goddard is not mellow.
Royce is tan.
Nathalie is not mellow.
Theobold is good-tempered.
Konrad is not terrible.
Nathalie is not tan.
Konrad is mellow.
Nathalie is not helpful.
Theobold is not every.
Konrad is not tan.
Ryan is not every.Royce being not good-tempered is equivalent to Konrad being not every and Ryan being terrible.
If Goddard is mellow or Konrad is not terrible, then Nathalie is not every.
Someone being not helpful is equivalent to being tan.
It can be concluded that Konrad is terrible once knowing that Nathalie is every and Theobold is good-tempered.
If there is at least one people who is both not terrible and tan, then Theobold is helpful.
Royce is helpful if and only if Royce is tan and Konrad is mellow.
It can be concluded that Nathalie is not helpful and Goddard is good-tempered once knowing that Royce is terrible and Goddard is not every.
Goddard is terrible if and only if Goddard is not good-tempered and Ryan is every.
If there is someone who is either not mellow or terrible, then Lombard is helpful.
Nathalie is every if and only if Royce is good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Lombard is not helpful once knowing that Ryan is not good-tempered or Konrad is not tan.
Someone being both helpful and good-tempered is equivalent to being tan. | Konrad is tan. | contradiction |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Katrina is inner. | self_contradiction |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Katrina is better. | entailment |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Brian is not purple. | neutral |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Bevis is not purple. | self_contradiction |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Kerry is not strict. | contradiction |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Brian is not strict. | neutral |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Brian is better. | contradiction |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Brian is not better. | entailment |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Bevis is not strict. | contradiction |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Bevis is not depressed. | self_contradiction |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Kerry is healthy. | neutral |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Eunice is not depressed. | entailment |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Bevis is not better. | self_contradiction |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Katrina is healthy. | contradiction |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Bevis is strict. | entailment |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Bevis is not inner. | self_contradiction |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Katrina is depressed. | entailment |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Shamus is inner. | neutral |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Kerry is depressed. | contradiction |
Kerry is purple.
Eunice is strict.
Bevis is not healthy.
Brian is not better.
Eunice is not better.
Bevis is not inner.
Kerry is strict.
Rick is not better.
Katrina is depressed.
Eunice is not purple.
Bevis is strict.
Katrina is purple.Someone being both not inner and better is equivalent to being purple and not healthy.
If someone is not inner and not purple, then he is better, and vice versa.
If someone is depressed and inner, then he is both not healthy and better, and vice versa.
If Eunice is healthy, then Rick is not depressed, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not depressed and inner, then Katrina is not purple.
Bevis being not better is equivalent to Kerry being not depressed.
If Shamus is depressed and Eunice is not strict, then Kerry is not purple and Shamus is not better, and vice versa.
If Brian is purple and Brian is better, then Shamus is strict.
It can be concluded that Rick is strict once knowing that Shamus is not inner.
Someone who is strict is always both purple and not depressed.
If there is someone who is not purple, then Katrina is inner and Rick is not healthy.
If all people are healthy, then Kerry is purple. | Shamus is healthy. | neutral |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Roland is not nervous. | neutral |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Hector is not obnoxious. | entailment |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Johnny is nervous. | entailment |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Roland is nervous. | neutral |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Conan is not obnoxious. | self_contradiction |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Hector is not determined. | neutral |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Conan is tender. | self_contradiction |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Jacob is expensive. | entailment |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Conan is not determined. | contradiction |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Conan is nervous. | entailment |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Conan is not expensive. | contradiction |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Johnny is tender. | contradiction |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Arvel is not obnoxious. | self_contradiction |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Jacob is not obnoxious. | contradiction |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Roland is not expensive. | entailment |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Conan is not unfair. | self_contradiction |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Hector is expensive. | neutral |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Johnny is not obnoxious. | self_contradiction |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Jacob is determined. | contradiction |
Arvel is nervous.
Melody is obnoxious.
Hector is not obnoxious.
Jacob is obnoxious.
Conan is tender.
Arvel is not obnoxious.
Arvel is not unfair.
Jacob is not determined.
Arvel is tender.
Melody is expensive.
Roland is not expensive.
Jacob is expensive.Arvel is not tender if and only if Conan is determined.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Johnny is not determined and Johnny is not obnoxious.
Someone is not tender and unfair if and only if he is nervous.
If someone who is not obnoxious is also not determined, then he is unfair.
If Jacob is not determined, then Johnny is nervous, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is expensive, then Jacob is unfair.
Conan being not unfair is equivalent to Arvel being not determined.
Melody being obnoxious and Jacob being expensive imply that Conan is not unfair.
If someone is not unfair or nervous, then he is obnoxious.
If someone is tender, then he is both obnoxious and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is both obnoxious and expensive, then Conan is nervous.
As long as someone is either not tender or determined, he is unfair and not obnoxious. | Roland is unfair. | neutral |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Brian is puny. | self_contradiction |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Kirby is not foolish. | neutral |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Albern is not unpleasant. | entailment |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Kirby is unpleasant. | entailment |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Jason is rare. | entailment |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Alisa is funny. | contradiction |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Jason is not unpleasant. | entailment |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Albern is funny. | contradiction |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Alisa is rare. | self_contradiction |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Brian is not foolish. | contradiction |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Brian is unpleasant. | contradiction |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Chandler is funny. | entailment |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Alisa is not unpleasant. | self_contradiction |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Albern is not psychological. | self_contradiction |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Leslie is puny. | neutral |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Kirby is not funny. | neutral |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Chandler is foolish. | neutral |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Alisa is not psychological. | self_contradiction |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Leslie is not psychological. | neutral |
Kirby is unpleasant.
Leslie is foolish.
Albern is not funny.
Kirby is not puny.
Jason is rare.
Chandler is not rare.
Jason is psychological.
Alisa is unpleasant.
Brian is not unpleasant.
Albern is not psychological.
Alisa is psychological.
Jason is funny.Someone is puny if and only if he is not unpleasant.
It can be concluded that Chandler is not rare once knowing that Brian is puny and Jason is not funny.
If everyone is not unpleasant, then Leslie is not rare.
If there is at least one people who is not rare, then Kirby is not puny and Chandler is funny.
As long as someone is not psychological, he is rare and foolish.
Someone is not funny and puny if and only if he is psychological.
If someone is psychological or he is not funny, then he is foolish.
If someone is both rare and foolish, then he is not funny.
Someone being both not puny and rare is equivalent to being not unpleasant.
If someone is both unpleasant and puny, then he is not rare.
If someone is not psychological, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is puny, then Brian is funny and Leslie is not foolish. | Jason is not rare. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits