premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Norris is not delightful. | contradiction |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Jonathan is not legal. | entailment |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Hadley is not excited. | entailment |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Rodney is diplomatic. | self_contradiction |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Culbert is not round. | neutral |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Jonathan is not delightful. | neutral |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Brent is not excited. | entailment |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Norris is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Brent is excited. | contradiction |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Jonathan is not friendly. | neutral |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Jonathan is legal. | contradiction |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Hadley is not friendly. | entailment |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Rodney is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Rodney is not delightful. | self_contradiction |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Norris is not round. | entailment |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Brent is not legal. | contradiction |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Hadley is diplomatic. | neutral |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Hadley is not diplomatic. | neutral |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Rodney is not legal. | contradiction |
Brent is not round.
Hadwin is excited.
Norris is not round.
Jonathan is not legal.
Hadley is legal.
Culbert is excited.
Brent is legal.
Rodney is excited.
Brent is delightful.
Norris is legal.
Rodney is diplomatic.
Hadley is not round.If Jonathan is round or Jonathan is delightful, then Culbert is not legal.
Jonathan being round or Norris being delightful implies that Hadwin is not friendly.
If there is someone who is excited, then Rodney is not diplomatic and Hadwin is legal.
If someone is not excited or delightful, then he is not round.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both friendly and not delightful.
Someone who is not round is always both not friendly and not excited.
Hadwin being not excited and Rodney being friendly imply that Rodney is round.
If someone is delightful, then he is legal.
If someone is not diplomatic and friendly, then he is delightful, and vice versa.
If someone is friendly or not excited, then he is legal.
Someone being both not round and excited is equivalent to being friendly and not delightful.
If there is someone who is not friendly, then Norris is delightful and Hadley is not excited. | Norris is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Culbert is shiny. | entailment |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Culbert is aware. | entailment |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Dave is ugly. | entailment |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Calvert is ugly. | neutral |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Kirby is not obedient. | self_contradiction |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Amanda is ugly. | neutral |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Dave is harsh. | self_contradiction |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Amanda is not ugly. | neutral |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Kirby is not harsh. | self_contradiction |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Dave is not successful. | contradiction |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Jarvis is harsh. | contradiction |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Jed is not shiny. | contradiction |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Dave is aware. | entailment |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Jarvis is shiny. | neutral |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Culbert is successful. | neutral |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Kirby is shiny. | self_contradiction |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Culbert is harsh. | contradiction |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Dave is shiny. | entailment |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Kirby is obedient. | self_contradiction |
Dave is aware.
Calvert is not harsh.
Dave is harsh.
Dave is shiny.
Kirby is not shiny.
Jed is not ugly.
Jed is not successful.
Kirby is obedient.
Jarvis is not harsh.
Culbert is not ugly.
Jed is shiny.
Kirby is aware.Someone who is aware and harsh is always not obedient and successful.
If Calvert is successful, then Culbert is shiny and Kirby is ugly, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Culbert is shiny once knowing that Calvert is aware or Jarvis is not ugly.
If someone is obedient and shiny, then he is not aware, and vice versa.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being shiny.
If someone is aware or he is not ugly, then he is not harsh.
If Kirby is harsh or Calvert is shiny, then Jarvis is not ugly.
Someone who is both not aware and successful is always harsh.
Someone who is not shiny is always successful.
If someone is shiny, then he is aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is both obedient and not shiny is always harsh.
If there is at least one people who is both harsh and aware, then Jarvis is not obedient. | Dave is not ugly. | contradiction |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Royce is not sane. | neutral |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Kirby is not thankful. | entailment |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Royce is not versatile. | contradiction |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Burton is dark. | contradiction |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Carter is versatile. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Royce is versatile. | entailment |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Clive is versatile. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Kerwin is not thankful. | entailment |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Burton is sane. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Kirby is not sane. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Kirby is dark. | contradiction |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Royce is not excited. | entailment |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Burton is clear. | neutral |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Royce is sane. | neutral |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Kirby is thankful. | contradiction |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Kirby is not versatile. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Kerwin is not clear. | neutral |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Carter is clear. | entailment |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Kirby is excited. | neutral |
Kerwin is sane.
Royce is versatile.
Clive is not clear.
Burton is not thankful.
Carter is clear.
Clive is not sane.
Royce is not excited.
Hubert is sane.
Carter is not thankful.
Burton is not dark.
Kirby is sane.
Burton is sane.Someone being sane is equivalent to being not thankful.
If there is at least one people who is either dark or excited, then Hubert is not sane and Kirby is clear.
It can be concluded that Royce is versatile once knowing that Royce is excited.
All dark people are excited.
It can be concluded that Carter is clear once knowing that Clive is sane.
As long as someone is not thankful, he is not versatile and not sane.
Someone is not dark and not versatile if and only if he is not sane.
If someone is not dark, then he is both versatile and not thankful.
If there is someone who is excited, then Clive is thankful.
If there is someone who is versatile, then Kerwin is dark.
Royce being not clear is equivalent to Hubert being not versatile and Kerwin being dark.
If Kirby is not sane, then Hubert is not dark. | Carter is thankful. | contradiction |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Jeremiah is long. | contradiction |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Jeremiah is not eastern. | contradiction |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Martin is pink. | contradiction |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Carolina is eastern. | entailment |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Carolina is long. | contradiction |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Carolina is not long. | entailment |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Ramsey is traditional. | neutral |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Hall is not long. | entailment |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Michael is traditional. | neutral |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Ramsey is not few. | neutral |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Hall is not pink. | neutral |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Jeremiah is not pink. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Carolina is plain. | entailment |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Michael is not few. | neutral |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Michael is long. | entailment |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Hall is eastern. | contradiction |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Carolina is not traditional. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Carolina is not few. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Jeremiah is few. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is eastern.
Martin is few.
Carolina is eastern.
Hall is not long.
Martin is long.
Jeremiah is not traditional.
Hall is not eastern.
Ramsey is long.
Michael is long.
Carolina is not traditional.
Jeremiah is few.
Ramsey is plain.If there is someone who is either not eastern or few, then Martin is traditional.
If someone is not plain or he is not traditional, then he is not long.
Someone is pink and traditional if and only if he is not long and plain.
If someone is both not traditional and eastern, then he is not few.
If there is someone who is either not eastern or not traditional, then Martin is not pink.
Someone who is not traditional is always both not pink and plain.
Someone is plain and few if and only if he is eastern and not pink.
If someone is not pink or he is eastern, then he is not few.
If someone is not plain or traditional, then he is few.
If there is at least one people who is either not long or eastern, then Martin is traditional and Carolina is not few.
Hall being not traditional is equivalent to Michael being eastern.
If Michael is not long and Jeremiah is not pink, then Hall is not plain. | Carolina is few. | self_contradiction |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Trent is not sensible. | entailment |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Trent is not administrative. | self_contradiction |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Leona is not oak. | contradiction |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Trent is oak. | entailment |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Mark is not administrative. | self_contradiction |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Alisa is not happy. | entailment |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Leona is not happy. | entailment |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Leona is not administrative. | self_contradiction |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Mark is not sensible. | entailment |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Martin is not sensible. | neutral |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Leona is not sensible. | self_contradiction |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Alberto is not happy. | neutral |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Martin is not happy. | contradiction |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Antonio is not administrative. | self_contradiction |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Alberto is happy. | neutral |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Alberto is not administrative. | neutral |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Antonio is happy. | contradiction |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Alisa is not ashamed. | neutral |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Alisa is happy. | contradiction |
Antonio is hurt.
Martin is administrative.
Mark is hurt.
Antonio is oak.
Martin is not hurt.
Mark is oak.
Alisa is not happy.
Leona is sensible.
Antonio is not sensible.
Leona is oak.
Alberto is not oak.
Leona is not ashamed.Someone being hurt is equivalent to being not administrative.
Someone being both not sensible and not administrative is equivalent to being oak.
If everyone is not happy, then Mark is administrative.
If there is someone who is not sensible, then Leona is not hurt.
Leona being not oak is equivalent to Trent being administrative and Mark being happy.
If there is someone who is administrative, then Trent is oak.
If Alisa is happy and Mark is oak, then Trent is ashamed and Martin is not hurt.
Martin being happy is equivalent to Antonio being administrative.
As long as someone is not sensible, he is not happy and administrative.
If someone is not hurt, then he is not ashamed, and vice versa.
Someone is not hurt and not oak if and only if he is ashamed.
If Martin is not oak, then Alberto is not sensible. | Alberto is oak. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits