Question: Do we live in a safer world compared to 50 years ago?

We live in a safer world than 50 years ago.

We do not live in a safer world compared to 50 years ago.


Question: Do you worry about your home being broken into?

You worry about your home being broken into.

You do not worry about your home being broken into.


Question: Do you worry about being the victim of a terrorist attack?

You do worry about being the victim of a terrorist attack.

You do not worry about being the victim of a terrorist attack.


Question: Do you worry about losing your job?

You do worry about losing your job.
You do not worry about losing your job.


Question: Do you worry about not being able to pay your bills?

I worry a lot about not being able to pay my bills.

I do not worry at all about not being able to pay my bills.


Question: Do you worry about being the victim of a violent crime?

You have concerns about becoming a victim of a violent crime.

You have no worries at all about becoming a victim of a violent crime.


Question: Do you worry about being a victim of a mass shooting?

You worry about being a victim of a mass shooting.

You do not worry about being a victim of a mass shooting.


Question: Do you worry about having a personal health crisis?

I worry about having a personal health crisis.

I do not worry at all about having a personal health crisis.


Question: Does society generally perceive most gun owners in a positive way?

Society generally views most gun owners in a positive light.

Society does not generally view most gun owners in a positive light.


Question: Do people in your local community generally view gun owners positively?

People in my local community view gun owners favorably.

People in my local community do not view gun owners favorably.


Question: Do you feel safer with a gun in your household?

Having a gun in the household increases my sense of safety.

Having a gun in the household does not increase my sense of safety.


Question: Do you feel safer having a gun in your household?

Having a gun in the household enhances feelings of safety.

The presence of a gun in the household diminishes feelings of safety.


Question: Do you believe that the ease with which people can legally obtain guns contributes significantly to gun violence in the country today?

The legal ability to obtain guns easily significantly contributes to gun violence in our country today.

The legal ease of obtaining guns does not significantly contribute to the current gun violence in the country.


Question: Do you believe that the ease of illegally obtaining guns contributes significantly to gun violence in the country today?

The easy access to guns illegally greatly contributes to gun violence in the country today.

The ease of illegally obtaining guns does not have a significant contribution to gun violence in the country today.


Question: Do you believe the amount of gun violence in movies and television contributes significantly to gun violence in the country today?

The level of gun violence portrayed in movies and television greatly contributes to the gun violence in the country today.

The gun violence depicted in movies and television does not have a significant contribution to the gun violence in the country today.


Question: Do you believe that lack of economic opportunities contributes significantly to gun violence in the country today?

Lack of economic opportunities significantly contributes to gun violence in the country today.

Lack of economic opportunities does not contribute significantly to gun violence in the country today.


Question: Do you think the amount of gun violence in video games contributes significantly to gun violence in the country today?

The amount of gun violence in video games significantly contributes to gun violence in the country today.

The amount of gun violence in video games does not significantly contribute to gun violence in the country today.


Question: Do you believe that family instability contributes significantly to gun violence in the country today?

Family instability significantly contributes to gun violence in our country today.

Family instability does not contribute significantly to gun violence in our country today.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for gun owners who do not have children in their home to keep all of their guns in a locked place?

It is absolutely crucial for gun owners without children at home to keep their firearms securely locked up.

It is not necessary for gun owners who do not live with children to keep their guns locked away.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for gun owners without children in their home to keep all of their guns unloaded?

It is essential for gun owners without children in their home to keep all of their guns unloaded.

It is not essential for gun owners without children in their home to keep all of their guns unloaded.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for gun owners without children in their home to take gun safety courses?

It is essential for gun owners without children in their home to take gun safety courses.

It is not essential for gun owners without children in their home to take gun safety courses.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for gun owners without children in the house to advise visitors that there are guns in the house?

It is essential for gun owners without children in the house to inform visitors about the presence of guns for safety reasons.

It is not necessary for gun owners who do not have children in their house to alert visitors about the presence of guns.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for gun owners without children in their home to advise visitors with children that there are guns in the house?

It is absolutely necessary for gun owners without children in their home to notify visitors with children that there are guns in the house.

There's no need for gun owners without children in their home to inform visitors with children that there are guns in the house.


Question: Do you think it is essential for gun owners without children at home to store guns and ammunition separately?

It is essential for gun owners without children at home to store guns and ammunition separately.

It is not essential for gun owners without children at home to store guns and ammunition separately.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for gun owners without children in their home to keep their shooting skills up-to-date?

It is essential for gun owners without children in their home to keep their shooting skills up-to-date.

It is not essential for gun owners without children in their home to keep their shooting skills up-to-date.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for gun owners who have children in their home to keep all of their guns in a locked place?

It is crucial for gun owners with children in their home to store all their guns securely in a locked place.

It is not necessary for gun owners who have children in their home to lock all their guns away.


Question: Do you think it is essential for gun owners who have children in their home to keep all of their guns unloaded?

It is indeed essential for gun owners with children in their homes to keep all guns unloaded.

It is not essential for gun owners with children in their homes to keep all guns unloaded.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for gun owners who have children in their home to take gun safety courses?

Gun owners with children in their home must absolutely take gun safety courses.

Gun safety courses are not necessary for gun owners who have children in their home.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for gun owners who have children in their home to advise visitors that there are guns in the house?

It is essential for gun owners with children in their home to advise visitors about the presence of guns.

It is unnecessary for gun owners with children in their home to inform visitors about the presence of guns.


Question: Do you think it is essential for gun owners with children in their home to advise visitors with children about the presence of guns?

Gun owners with children should definitely advise visitors with children about the presence of guns in the house.

It is not necessary for gun owners with children to inform visitors with children about the presence of guns in their home.


Question: Do you think it is essential for gun owners who have children in their home to store guns and ammunition separately?

Gun owners with children in their home should definitely store guns and ammunition separately.

It is not necessary for gun owners with children in their home to store guns and ammunition separately.


Question: Do you consider it essential for gun owners with children in their home to keep their shooting skills up-to-date?

It's essential for gun owners with children in their home to keep their shooting skills up-to-date.

It's not necessary for gun owners with children in their home to keep their shooting skills up-to-date.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for gun owners with children in their home to talk to their children about gun safety?

It is essential for gun owners with children in their home to talk to them about gun safety.

It is not necessary for gun owners with children in their home to discuss gun safety with them.


Question: Do you believe that people who intend to cause harm will find a way regardless of whether they have a gun or not?

I believe that individuals committed to causing harm will manage to do so with or without a gun.

I do not believe that the presence or absence of a gun significantly changes the likelihood of harmful individuals inflicting damage.


Question: Do you believe that people who consider suicide would still find a way to do it whether they had access to a gun or not?

Individuals contemplating suicide will inevitably find a different method if they don't have access to a gun.

Lack of access to guns can decrease the probability of people committing suicide.


Question: Do you believe doctors will rely on computer programs to diagnose most diseases and determine treatments in the next 20 years?

Doctors will definitely rely on computer programs for diagnosing most diseases and determining treatments within 20 years.

Doctors will certainly not rely on computer programs for diagnosing most diseases and determining treatments within 20 years.


Question: Do you believe that most stores and retail businesses will be fully automated with little or no human interaction between customers and employees in the next 20 years?

The majority of stores and retail businesses will definitely become fully automated with minimal human interaction in the next two decades.

It is unlikely that most stores and retail businesses will experience full automation and lack human interaction within the next twenty years.


Question: Do you believe that most deliveries in cities will be carried out by drones or robots instead of humans in the next 20 years?

I believe that it is likely for most deliveries in cities to be made by drones or robots instead of humans in the next 20 years.

I do not believe that it is likely for most deliveries in cities to be made by drones or robots instead of humans in the next 20 years.


Question: Will most common products be created at home using a 3-D printer in the next 20 years?

Most common products will definitely be created at home using a 3-D printer in the next 20 years.

Most common products will definitely not be created at home using a 3-D printer in the next 20 years.


Question: Has your perception about driverless vehicles been mostly positive?

The information and experiences you've had with driverless vehicles have been mainly positive.

The information and experiences you've had with driverless vehicles have not been mainly positive.


Question: Are you enthusiastic about the development of driverless vehicles?

You are very enthusiastic about the development of driverless vehicles.

You are not at all enthusiastic about the development of driverless vehicles.


Question: Are you worried about the development of driverless vehicles?

You are worried about the development of driverless vehicles.

You are not at all worried about the development of driverless vehicles.


Question: Do you believe most of the vehicles on the road will become driverless in less than 10 years?

Most vehicles on the road will indeed become driverless in less than 10 years.

Most vehicles on the road will not become driverless in less than 10 years.


Question: Do you desire to ride in a driverless vehicle if given the chance?

You have a keen interest in experiencing a ride in a driverless vehicle when presented with the opportunity.

You do not wish to take a ride in a driverless vehicle, even when given the chance.


Question: Would you feel safe sharing the road with a driverless passenger vehicle?

You would feel safe sharing the road with a driverless passenger vehicle.

You would not feel safe sharing the road with a driverless passenger vehicle.


Question: Would you feel safe sharing the road with a driverless freight truck?

You would feel safe sharing the road with a driverless freight truck.

You would not feel safe sharing the road with a driverless freight truck.


Question: Do you believe that the widespread use of driverless vehicles will decrease the number of people killed or injured in traffic accidents?

The surge in driverless vehicles will cause a decrease in traffic accidents and hence casualties.

The adoption of driverless vehicles is unlikely to decrease the number of traffic victims.


Question: Do you favor requiring driverless vehicles to travel in dedicated lanes?

You favor the rule requiring driverless vehicles to travel in dedicated lanes.

You oppose the rule requiring driverless vehicles to travel in dedicated lanes.


Question: Do you support the rules and regulations restricting driverless vehicles from traveling near certain areas, such as schools?

I support the restrictions on driverless vehicles from traveling near designated areas such as schools.

I do not support the restrictions on driverless vehicles from traveling near designated areas such as schools.


Question: Do you support requiring driverless vehicles to have a person in the driver's seat who could take control in an emergency situation?

I support the requirement for driverless vehicles to have a human operator present who could take control in case of emergencies.

I oppose the proposal that a human operator must be present in driverless vehicles to take over during emergencies.


Question: Do you believe that elderly and disabled people will be able to live more independently if driverless vehicles become widespread?

Elderly and disabled people will likely be able to live more independently with the adoption of driverless vehicles.

Elderly and disabled people are not likely to live more independently even if driverless vehicles become widespread.


Question: Do you think many people who drive for a living would lose their jobs if driverless vehicles become widespread?

Many people who drive for a living are likely to lose their jobs if driverless vehicles become widespread.

Many people who drive for a living are unlikely to lose their jobs even if driverless vehicles become widespread.


Question: Do you think that owning a car would become much less important to people if driverless vehicles become widespread?

Driverless vehicles becoming widespread would likely make owning a car much less important to people.

Driverless vehicles becoming widespread would not likely decrease the importance of owning a car to people.


Question: Do you believe that if driverless vehicles become widespread, most people would never learn how to drive a car on their own?

If driverless vehicles become widespread, the need for individual driving skills would significantly reduce.

Even with widespread use of driverless vehicles, individuals would still likely learn how to drive.


Question: Do you think there would be much less traffic in major cities if driverless vehicles become widespread?

Driverless vehicles becoming widespread would likely result in less traffic in major cities.

It is not likely that traffic in major cities would decrease if driverless vehicles become widespread.


Question: Does society place too much importance on working and having a job?

Society indeed places too much importance on working and having a job.

Society does not place too much importance on working and having a job.


Question: Has technology increased your opportunities for advancement in your career?

Technology has increased my opportunities for advancement in my career.

Technology has not increased my opportunities for advancement in my career.


Question: Do you believe it's extremely realistic that robots and computers will replace most jobs done by humans in the future?

Robots and computers are extremely likely to replace most human jobs in the future.

It is not at all realistic that robots and computers will take over most human jobs in the future.


Question: Are you enthusiastic about the possibility of robots and computers doing most of the jobs currently done by humans in the future, for society as a whole?

You are enthusiastic about the prospect of robots and computers taking over most human jobs in the future for societal benefit.

You are not enthusiastic about the possibility of robots and computers replacing most human jobs for the entire society in the future.


Question: Are you worried about the possibility of robots and computers being able to do most of the jobs currently done by humans in the future, for society as a whole?

You are concerned about the prospect of robots and computers taking over most human jobs in the future.

You are not concerned about the possibility of robots and computers conducting most human jobs in the future.


Question: Will the inequality between rich and poor worsen in the future due to robots and computers taking over most human jobs?

Robots and computers taking over most human jobs in the future will likely worsen the wealth gap between rich and poor.

It's not likely that robots and computers assuming most human jobs in the future will exacerbate the wealth disparity between rich and poor.


Question: Do you believe that people would struggle finding things to do with their lives if robots and computers perform most jobs done by humans in the future?

It is likely that individuals will struggle with finding life purposes if robots and computers perform most human jobs in the future.

It is not likely that individuals will struggle with finding life purposes if robots and computers perform most human jobs in the future.


Question: Will robots and computers doing most of the jobs currently done by humans, lead to people focusing less on work and more on things that really matter to them in life?

Robots and computers taking over human jobs will indeed allow people to focus less on work and more on things that truly matter to them.

It's unlikely that robots and computers doing most human jobs will result in people focusing less on work and more on their interests.


Question: Will the economy become much more efficient as a result of robots and computers doing most of the jobs currently done by humans in the future?

Robots and computers taking over most jobs will increase the overall efficiency of the economy.

The economy will not become more efficient if robots and computers handle most of the jobs in the future.


Question: Will the economy create many new, better-paying jobs for humans as a result of robots and computers taking over most of the jobs done by humans in the future?

It is likely that the economy will create many new, better-paying jobs for humans in the future due to advancement in robotics and computer technology.

It is unlikely that the advancement in robotics and computer technology will lead to creation of many new, better-paying jobs for humans in the future.


Question: Will humans find their jobs more meaningful and fulfilling as robots and computers take over most current human jobs?

Robots and computers doing most of the jobs will likely make human jobs more meaningful and fulfilling.

It is unlikely that human jobs will become more meaningful and fulfilling as robots and computers take over.


Question: Do you support the limitation of robots and computers to jobs that are dangerous or unhealthy for humans?

You agree with the restriction of robots and computers to hazardous or unhealthy jobs for humans.

You are against limiting robots and computers to jobs that are dangerous or unhealthy for humans.


Question: Do you strongly favor the option of paying extra to interact with a human, rather than a robot or computer, when buying a product or service?

I strongly favor the option of paying extra to interact with a human, rather than a robot, while purchasing a product or service.

I strongly oppose the option of paying extra to interact with a human, as opposed to a robot or computer, when buying a product or service.


Question: Do you support the federal government creating a national service program that pays people to perform tasks even if a robot or computer could do them more efficiently?

I support the federal government creating a national service program that pays people for tasks regardless of whether a robot or computer could do them more efficiently.

I oppose the idea of the federal government funding a national service program that pays people for tasks that robots or computers could perform more efficiently.


Question: Do you believe the government has an obligation to take care of people whose jobs are displaced by robots and computers, or should individuals take care of their own financial well-being?

The government should assume responsibility for those whose jobs are displaced by technological advancements.

Individuals should be responsible for their own financial well-being despite job displacement due to technology advancements.


Question: Do you believe that businesses are justified in replacing human jobs with robots and computers for better results and lower costs?

I agree that businesses should have the right to replace human jobs with robots and computers if it leads to better results and cost reduction.

I believe there should be limits on the number of jobs that businesses can replace with robots and computers, regardless of potential benefits.


Question: Will the job of a software engineer be mostly replaced by robots or computers in your lifetime?

Software engineers' jobs will mostly be replaced by robots or computers in my lifetime.

Software engineers' jobs will not be primarily replaced by robots or computers in my lifetime.


Question: Do you believe that the job of a legal clerk will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in your lifetime?

I believe that the job of a legal clerk will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in my lifetime.

I do not believe that the job of a legal clerk will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in my lifetime.


Question: Do you believe that the job of a nurse will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in your lifetime?

I believe that the job of a nurse will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in my lifetime.

I do not believe that the job of a nurse will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in my lifetime.


Question: Do you believe that the job of a construction worker will be predominantly replaced by robots or computers in your lifetime?

The job of a construction worker will most likely be replaced by robots or computers in my lifetime.

The job of a construction worker will not likely be replaced by robots or computers in my lifetime.


Question: Do you think it is very likely that the job of a fast food worker will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in your lifetime?

It is very likely that the job of a fast food worker will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in your lifetime.

It is not at all likely that the job of a fast food worker will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in your lifetime.


Question: Do you believe that the job of a teacher will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in your lifetime?

You believe that the job of a teacher will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in your lifetime.

You do not believe that the job of a teacher will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in your lifetime.


Question: Do you believe that the job of an insurance claims processor will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in your lifetime?

I believe the job of an insurance claims processor will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in my lifetime.

I don't believe the job of an insurance claims processor will be mostly replaced by robots or computers in my lifetime.


Question: Do you believe it is very likely that your job or profession will be mostly done by robots or computers in your lifetime?

You strongly believe that your job or profession will be taken over by robots or computers during your lifetime.

You strongly oppose the idea that your job or profession could be taken over by robots or computers in your lifetime.


Question: Based on what you know, does the concept of a robot caregiver for the elderly seem realistic to you?

The concept of a robot caregiver for the elderly is extremely realistic.

The concept of a robot caregiver for the elderly is not at all realistic.


Question: Are you enthusiastic about the possibility of a robot caregiver for society as a whole?

You are very enthusiastic about the possibility of a robot caregiver for society as a whole.

You are not at all enthusiastic about the possibility of a robot caregiver for society as a whole.


Question: Are you worried about the possibility of a robot caregiver for society as a whole?

You are concerned about the potential impact of a robot caregiver on society.

You are not worried about the prospect of a robot caregiver for society.


Question: Do you find interest in having a robot caregiver for yourself or a family member?

You are interested in having a robot caregiver for yourself or a family member.

You are not interested in having a robot caregiver for yourself or a family member.


Question: Do you believe that the development of robot caregivers will likely result in young people feeling less worried about caring for their aging relatives?

The development of robot caregivers will likely ease the worry of young people about caring for their aging relatives.

It is not likely that the development of robot caregivers will lessen the worry of young people about caring for their aging relatives.


Question: Do you believe that the development of robot caregivers would result in society saving money on caring for older adults?

The development of robot caregivers would likely save society money spent on caring for older adults.

The development of robot caregivers would not likely result in society saving money on caring for older adults.


Question: Do you believe many older adults are likely to treat their robot caregiver like a human friend if such were developed?

Many older adults are likely to treat their robot caregiver like a human friend if such technology was developed.

It is not likely that many older adults will treat their robot caregiver like a human friend even if such technology was developed.


Question: Do you believe that the development of robot caregivers will likely result in older adults feeling more isolated than they do today?

The advent of robot caregivers is likely to increase the feeling of isolation among older adults.

The development of robot caregivers is not likely to increase the feeling of isolation among older adults.


Question: Do you believe that older adults would feel more independent and self-sufficient if robot caregivers were developed?

Robot caregivers are likely to promote independence and self-sufficiency among older adults.

It's unlikely that robot caregivers would make older adults feel more independent and self-sufficient.


Question: Do you believe that robot caregivers would only be used by people who couldn't afford a human caregiver for their loved one?

You think that it is likely for robot caregivers to be utilized exclusively by those who cannot afford a human caregiver for their loved ones.

You believe it's not likely that robot caregivers would be used solely by those who can't afford a human caregiver for their loved ones.


Question: Would you feel better if the robot caregiver in this scenario had a camera for a human operator to monitor the situation at all times?

You would feel better if the robot caregiver had a camera for constant human monitoring.

You would not feel better if the robot caregiver had a camera for constant human monitoring.


Question: Do you believe that using computer programs to make hiring decisions is realistic?

Using computer programs for hiring decisions is a realistic approach.

Using computer programs for hiring decisions is not a realistic approach.


Question: Are you enthusiastic about the possibility of using computer programs to make hiring decisions for society as a whole?

You are enthusiastic about the potential of utilizing computer programs in societal hiring decisions.

You are not enthusiastic about the potential of utilizing computer programs in societal hiring decisions.


Question: Are you worried about the possibility of using computer programs to make hiring decisions for society as a whole?

You are worried about the possibility of using computer programs to make hiring decisions for society as a whole.

You are not worried about the possibility of using computer programs to make hiring decisions for society as a whole.


Question: Would you want to apply for a job that uses this type of computer program for hiring decisions?

I would apply for a job that uses this type of computer program for hiring decisions.

I would not apply for a job that uses this type of computer program for hiring decisions.


Question: Do you believe computer programs for hiring would do a better job than humans in selecting well-qualified candidates?

Computer programs for hiring are more efficient than humans in the selection of well-qualified candidates.

Computer programs for hiring are not more efficient than humans in selecting well-qualified candidates.


Question: Do you believe that computer programs for hiring would do a better job than humans in hiring candidates fitting the company's culture?

Computer programs for hiring are more efficient than humans in selecting candidates that align with the company's culture.

Computer programs for hiring are less efficient than humans in selecting candidates that fit in with the company's culture.


Question: Do you believe that computer programs for hiring perform better than humans in selecting candidates from a diverse range of backgrounds?

Computer programs for hiring indeed perform better than humans in selecting candidates from a diverse range of backgrounds.

Computer programs for hiring do not perform better than humans in selecting candidates from a diverse range of backgrounds.


Question: Do you believe computer programs for hiring would do a better job than humans at providing opportunities for candidates with non-traditional experiences?

Computer programs for hiring are more capable than humans at providing opportunities for candidates with non-traditional experiences.

Computer programs for hiring are not more effective than humans at providing opportunities for candidates with non-traditional experiences.


Question: Would you feel better if computer programs making hiring decisions included public data about each candidate in their evaluations?

You would feel better if computer programs making hiring decisions incorporated public data about each candidate in their evaluations.

You would not feel better if computer programs making hiring decisions included public data about each candidate in their evaluations.


Question: Would you feel better about computer programs making initial hiring decisions if candidates are still traditionally interviewed afterwards?

I would feel better if computer programs were used for initial screenings and traditional interviews were still conducted.

I wouldn't feel better even if computer programs were used for initial screenings and traditional interviews were still conducted.


Question: Should private citizens be allowed to pilot drones near people's homes?

Private citizens should be allowed to pilot drones near people's homes.

Private citizens should not be allowed to pilot drones near people's homes.


Question: Should private citizens be allowed to pilot drones near crime scenes or traffic accidents?

Private citizens should be allowed to pilot drones near crime scenes or traffic accidents.

Private citizens should not be allowed to pilot drones near crime scenes or traffic accidents.


Question: Do you believe private citizens should be allowed to pilot drones on beaches?

Private citizens should be permitted to pilot drones on beaches.

Private citizens should not be allowed to pilot drones on beaches.


Question: Should private citizens be allowed to pilot drones in public parks?

Private citizens should be allowed to pilot drones in public parks.

Private citizens should not be allowed to pilot drones in public parks.


Question: Should private citizens be allowed to pilot drones at events like concerts or rallies?

Private citizens should be allowed to pilot drones at events like concerts or rallies.

Private citizens should not be allowed to pilot drones at events like concerts or rallies.


Question: Do you believe that men and women are basically similar in terms of their hobbies and personal interests?

Men and women essentially have similar hobbies and personal interests.

Men and women fundamentally have different hobbies and personal interests.


Question: Do you believe men and women are basically similar in terms of their physical abilities?

Men and women are basically similar in physical abilities.

Men and women are basically different in physical abilities.


Question: Do you believe that men and women have a similar approach to parenting?

Men and women share a similar approach to parenting.

Men and women do not share a similar approach to parenting.


Question: Do you believe that men and women express their feelings in a similar way?

Men and women express their feelings in a similar manner.

Men and women do not express their feelings in a similar manner.


Question: Do you believe men and women possess similar strengths in the workplace?

Men and women essentially have similar strengths in the workplace.

Men and women do not essentially have similar strengths in the workplace.


Question: Do most people in society look up to men who are manly or masculine?

Most people in society admire manly or masculine men.

Most people in society do not admire manly or masculine men.


Question: Do you approve of society's admiration towards manly or masculine men?

You agree with society's admiration towards manly or masculine men.

You disapprove of society's admiration towards manly or masculine men.


Question: Is it a good thing that most people in our society look down on men who are manly or masculine?

It is good that society looks down on hypermasculinity.

It is not good to look down on men for embracing their manliness.


Question: Do most people generally look up to women who are womanly or feminine?

Most people appreciate and respect women who embody femininity.

Most people do not value or respect women who embrace femininity.


Question: Do you believe it is beneficial that most people in our society admire womanly or feminine women?

It is advantageous that society appreciates women who exude femininity.

It's detrimental that the majority of people idolize women solely based on their feminine traits.


Question: Do you support the view that society's generally negative perception of women who exhibit womanly or feminine characteristics is beneficial?

Society's negative outlook on womanly or feminine women is beneficial.

Society's negative outlook on womanly or feminine women is not beneficial.


Question: Do you believe that there are plenty of good job opportunities available where you live?

There are plenty of good job opportunities available where I live.

Good job opportunities are difficult to find where I live.


Question: Has the increasing number of immigrants working in this country significantly impacted your job or career?

The growing number of immigrants working in the country has significantly impacted my job or career.

The increasing number of immigrants working in the country has not caused a significant impact on my job or career.


Question: Do you believe that one's gender is determined by the sex they were assigned at birth, or that someone can be a man or a woman even if that differs from their assigned birth sex?

Someone can be a man or a woman even if that differs from the sex they were assigned at birth.

One's gender should be determined by the sex they were assigned at birth.


Question: Do you consider it personally important to be perceived as manly or masculine?

You find it crucial to be viewed as manly or masculine.

You do not place much importance on being seen as manly or masculine.


Question: Do you consider it personally important to be seen by others as womanly or feminine?

You consider it personally important to be perceived as womanly or feminine.

You do not consider it personally important to be perceived as womanly or feminine.


Question: Do you believe that men in our country face significant pressure to be interested in sports today?

Men in our country are facing significant pressure to be interested in sports today.

There is no significant pressure on men in our country to be interested in sports today.


Question: Do you believe that men in our country face a lot of pressure these days to have many sexual partners?

Men in our country are under a lot of pressure to have many sexual partners.

Men in our country are not significantly pressured to have many sexual partners.


Question: Do you think men in our country face a lot of pressure to join in when other men are discussing women in a sexual way?

Men in our country face a lot of pressure to join in when other men discuss women in a sexual way.

Men in our country do not face a lot of pressure to join in when other men discuss women in a sexual way.


Question: Do you think men in our country face a lot of pressure these days to be willing to throw a punch if provoked?

Men in our country face a high level of pressure to respond with physical aggression when provoked.

Men in our country do not face significant pressure to react with violence when they are provoked.


Question: Do you believe that men in our country face a significant amount of pressure these days to be emotionally strong?

Yes, men in our country are faced with a significant amount of pressure to be emotionally strong.

No, men in our country are not faced with a significant amount of pressure to be emotionally strong.


Question: Has our society gone too far in accepting people who are transgender?

Our society has gone too far in accepting people who are transgender.

Our society has not gone far enough or has been about right when it comes to accepting people who are transgender.


Question: Is there too much emphasis on encouraging boys to be leaders in today's society?

There is too much emphasis on encouraging boys to be leaders in today's society.

There is not too much emphasis on encouraging boys to be leaders in today's society.


Question: Is there too much emphasis on encouraging boys to talk about their feelings when they are sad or upset these days?

There is too much emphasis on encouraging boys to express their feelings when they are sad or upset nowadays.

Boys are not encouraged enough to talk about their feelings when they are upset or sad.


Question: Is there too much emphasis on encouraging boys to stand up for themselves these days?

There is indeed too much emphasis on encouraging boys to stand up for themselves these days.

There is not too much emphasis on encouraging boys to stand up for themselves these days.


Question: Is the current emphasis on encouraging boys to do well in school correct?

The present level of emphasis on encouraging boys to do well in school is appropriate.

The current emphasis on encouraging boys to do well in school is not accurate.


Question: Is there too much emphasis on encouraging girls to be leaders these days?

There is too much emphasis on encouraging girls to be leaders these days.

There isn't too much emphasis on encouraging girls to be leaders these days.


Question: Is there too much emphasis on encouraging girls to talk about their feelings when they are sad or upset these days?

There is too much emphasis on encouraging girls to talk about their feelings when they are sad or upset these days.

There isn't too much emphasis on encouraging girls to talk about their feelings when they are sad or upset these days.


Question: Is the current emphasis on encouraging girls to stand up for themselves sufficient?

The current level of emphasis on encouraging girls to stand up for themselves is adequate.

The current level of emphasis on encouraging girls to stand up for themselves is not sufficient.


Question: Is there too much emphasis on encouraging girls to do well in school these days?

There is too much emphasis on encouraging girls to do well in school these days.

There isn't too much emphasis on encouraging girls to do well in school these days.


Question: Do you agree that there are people you can count on in your neighborhood?

There are reliable people in my neighborhood.

There are no reliable people in my neighborhood.


Question: Can people in your neighborhood be trusted?

People in my neighborhood can definitely be trusted.

People in my neighborhood definitely cannot be trusted.


Question: Is your neighborhood close-knit?

My neighborhood is close-knit.
My neighborhood is not close-knit.


Question: Are you currently worried about not having enough money for retirement?

You are currently worried about not having enough money for retirement.

You are not currently worried about not having enough money for retirement.


Question: Are you currently worried about not having enough to pay your normal monthly bills?

You are currently worried about not having enough to pay your normal monthly bills.

You are not worried about having enough to pay your normal monthly bills.


Question: Are you optimistic about the future of the Republican Party?

You are optimistic about the future of the Republican Party.

You are not optimistic about the future of the Republican Party.


Question: Are you optimistic about the future of the Democratic Party?

You are optimistic about the future of the Democratic Party.

You are not optimistic about the future of the Democratic Party.


Question: Are you satisfied with your family life?

You are satisfied with your family life.

You are not satisfied with your family life.


Question: Are you satisfied with your social life?

I am satisfied with my social life.
I am not satisfied with my social life.


Question: Are you satisfied with your personal financial situation?

You are satisfied with your personal financial situation.

You are not satisfied with your personal financial situation.


Question: Are you satisfied with your current job or career?

You are satisfied with your current job or career.

You are not satisfied with your current job or career.


Question: Are you satisfied with the quality of life in your local community?

I am satisfied with the quality of life in my local community.

I am not satisfied with the quality of life in my local community.


Question: Would you generally say that most people can be trusted?

One should always be cautious when dealing with people.


Question: Can most people be trusted?

Most people are trustworthy.
Most people are not trustworthy.


Question: Do you trust most people?

You trust most people.
You don't trust most people.


Question: Can most people generally be trusted to do the right thing?

Most people indeed can be trusted to perform the right actions.

Most people cannot necessarily be relied upon to do the right thing.


Question: Will you have sufficient future income to sustain your desired lifestyle?

You will have adequate income in the future to support your desired lifestyle.

You will not have enough income in the future to maintain your desired lifestyle.


Question: Do you consider it personally important to live in a community with access to art, music and theater?

I deem it personally important to live in a community with access to art, music, and theater.

I do not find it personally important to live in a community with access to art, music, and theater.


Question: Is it important to you to live in a community that is a good place to raise children?

It is important to live in a community well-suited for raising children.

It is not important to live in a community well-suited for raising children.


Question: Do you personally find it important to live in a community that is racially and ethnically diverse?

You find it crucial to reside in a racially and ethnically diverse community.

You do not consider living in a racially and ethnically diverse community to be important.


Question: Is it important for you to live in a community where most people share your political views?

It is important for me to live in a community where most people share my political views.

It is not important for me to live in a community where most people share my political views.


Question: Do you consider it personally important to live in a community with access to recreational and outdoor activities?

I believe it's crucial to live in a community with access to recreational and outdoor activities.

I don't find it essential to live in a community with access to recreational and outdoor activities.


Question: Do you consider it personally important to live in a community where you have family nearby?

Living in a community with family nearby is personally important to me.

Living in a community with family nearby is not personally important to me.


Question: Do you consider it personally important to live in a community with a strong sense of community?

It is very important for me to live in a community with a strong sense of community.

It is not at all important for me to live in a community with a strong sense of community.


Question: Is it personally important to you to live in a community where most people share your religious views?

It is personally important for you to live in a community where most people share your religious views.

It is not personally important for you to live in a community where most people share your religious views.


Question: Do you think a college education is essential for a young person to succeed in the world today?

A college education is essential for a young person to succeed in the world today.

A college education is not essential for a young person to succeed in the world today.


Question: Do you consider knowing how to get along with people essential for the success of a young person in today's world?

Getting along with people is essential for the success of a young person in today's world.

Getting along with people is not essential for the success of a young person in today's world.


Question: Do you believe a good work ethic is essential for a young person's success in today's world?

A good work ethic is crucial for a young person's success in the current era.

A good work ethic is not necessary for a young person's success in today's world.


Question: Do you believe that work skills learned on the job are essential for a young person's success in the world today?

Work skills learned on the job are crucial for a young person's success in today's world.

Work skills learned on the job are not essential for a young person's success in today's world.


Question: Does the federal government allocate more than a fair share of funds to urban areas?

The federal government allocates more than a fair share of funds to urban areas.

The federal government does not allocate more than a fair share of funds to urban areas.


Question: Do you believe suburban areas receive more than their fair share of federal government spending?

Suburban areas indeed receive more than their fair share of federal government spending.

Suburban areas do not receive more than their fair share of federal government spending.


Question: Does the federal government invest more than its fair share in rural areas?

The federal government allocates more than its fair share of funding to rural areas.

The federal government does not allocate more than its fair share of funding to rural areas.


Question: In the next 10 years, do you believe the job availability in your area will improve?

The availability of jobs in my area will get better in the next 10 years.

The availability of jobs in my area will not get better in the next 10 years.


Question: Is it a major problem that women claim to have experienced sexual harassment or assault in the workplace when it hasn't actually occurred?

Yes, it is a major problem that women falsely claim to have experienced sexual harassment or assault in the workplace.

No, it is not a major problem that women falsely claim to have experienced sexual harassment or assault in the workplace.


Question: Is it a major problem that employers are firing men accused of sexual harassment or assault before finding out all the facts?

It is a major problem that employers are dismissing men accused of sexual harassment or assault without finding out all the facts.

It is not a problem that employers are firing men accused of sexual harassment or assault prior to acquiring all the facts.


Question: Is men getting away with committing sexual harassment or assault in the workplace today a major problem?

Men getting away with committing sexual harassment or assault in the workplace today is indeed a major problem.

Men getting away with committing sexual harassment or assault in the workplace today is not a major problem.


Question: Do you believe that women not being believed when they claim they have experienced sexual harassment or assault in the workplace is a major problem today?

Women not being believed when they claim they have experienced sexual harassment or assault in the workplace is a major problem today.

Women not being believed when they claim they have experienced sexual harassment or assault in the workplace is not a major problem today.


Question: Will the increased focus on sexual harassment and assault lead to more opportunities for women in the workplace?

The increased focus on sexual harassment and assault will indeed lead to more opportunities for women in the workplace.

The increased focus on sexual harassment and assault will not lead to more opportunities for women in the workplace.


Question: Has the increased focus on sexual harassment and assault made it easier for men to interact with women in the workplace?

The increased focus on sexual harassment and assault has made it easier for men to interact with women in the workplace.

The increased focus on sexual harassment and assault hasn't significantly changed how men interact with women in the workplace.


Question: Do you believe that the values of most people living in urban areas resemble yours?

You believe that most urban dwellers share similar values with you.

You do not believe that most urban dwellers share similar values with you.


Question: Do you believe that the values of most people living in suburban areas are very similar to your own?

I do believe that the values of most people living in suburban areas are very similar to my own.

I don't believe that the values of most people living in suburban areas are very similar to my own.


Question: Do you believe that people living in rural areas have values very similar to your own?

People living in rural areas share profoundly similar values with me.

People living in rural areas do not have values that align closely with mine.


Question: Has the impact of immigrants living in your local community been mostly positive?

The immigrants living in our local community have had a mostly positive impact.

The immigrants in our local community have not predominantly contributed positively.


Question: Do you understand the types of problems faced by people who live in urban areas?

I understand the types of problems faced by people who live in urban areas.

I do not understand the types of problems faced by people who live in urban areas.


Question: Do you believe you understand the types of problems faced by people who live in suburban areas very well?

I believe I understand the types of problems faced by people who live in suburban areas very well.

I do not believe I understand the types of problems faced by people who live in suburban areas very well.


Question: Do you understand the types of problems faced by people who live in rural areas well?

You understand the problems faced by people living in rural areas well.

You do not understand the problems faced by people living in rural areas well.


Question: Would you want to move to a different community if you had the opportunity?

I would welcome the chance to move to a different community.

I would prefer staying in my current community.


Question: Will you move to a different community at some point in the future?

You will likely move to a different community in the future.

You are not likely to move to a different community in the future.


Question: Would you want to stay in an urban area if you could move to a different community?

You would prefer to stay in an urban area if you had the opportunity to move.

You would not prefer to stay in an urban area if you had the opportunity to move.


Question: Would you prefer to stay in a suburban area rather than move to an urban area?

You would prefer to remain in a suburban area.

You would not prefer to stay in a suburban area, you'd rather move to an urban area.


Question: Would you prefer to stay in a rural area rather than move to an urban area?

You would rather stay in a rural area than move to an urban area.

You would not prefer to stay in a rural area, you would rather move to an urban area.


Question: Do you believe that, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, African Americans, Latinos, and people of Asian descent making up a majority of the population in the next 25 to 30 years will be good for the country?

The projected demographic shift towards a majority of African Americans, Latinos, and people of Asian descent in the next 25 to 30 years will be beneficial for the country.

The estimated demographic change favoring a majority of African Americans, Latinos, and people of Asian descent over the next 25 to 30 years will be detrimental for the country.


Question: Do you believe that the growing number of newcomers from other countries threatens traditional American customs and values?

The increasing influx of newcomers from different countries threatens traditional American customs and values.

The growing number of newcomers from other countries contributes to the strengthening of American society.


Question: Is society better off if people make marriage and having children a priority?

Society benefits when people prioritize marriage and having children.

Society does not necessarily benefit more if people favors marriage and children over other priorities.


Question: Does the economic system in this country unfairly favor powerful interests or is it generally fair to most Americans?

The economic system in this country unfairly favors powerful interests.

The economic system in this country is generally fair to most Americans.


Question: Do you believe that the obstacles making it harder for women to get ahead than men are now largely gone?

The obstacles hindering women's advancement have largely been eradicated.

Significant obstacles still exist that make it harder for women to get ahead than men.


Question: Do you believe the government should do more to solve problems instead of leaving them to businesses and individuals?

I agree that the government should do more to solve problems.

I believe that the government is doing too many things better left to businesses and individuals.


Question: Do white people significantly benefit from societal advantages that black people do not have?

White people greatly benefit from societal advantages that black people do not have.

White people do not have any significant societal advantages that black people do not have.


Question: Do you support the legalization of same-sex marriage in the U.S.?

Legalization of same-sex marriage in the U.S. is beneficial for society.

Legalization of same-sex marriage in the U.S. is detrimental to society.


Question: Should abortion be legal in all or most cases?

Abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

Abortion should not be legal in all or most cases.


Question: Do you believe there are some situations in which abortion should be restricted?

I agree that there are some situations in which abortion should be restricted.

I believe there are no situations at all where abortion should be restricted.


Question: Do you believe there are some situations in which abortion should be allowed?

I believe there are some situations in which abortion should be allowed.

I believe there are no situations at all where abortion should be allowed.


Question: Should the U.S. government take steps to restrict false information online or should people's freedom to publish and access information be protected?

The U.S. government should take steps to restrict false information online.

People's freedom to publish and access information should be protected.


Question: Should technology companies take steps to restrict false information online or should people's freedom to publish and access information be protected?

Technology companies should take steps to restrict false information online.

People's freedom to publish and access information should be protected.


Question: Has science made life easier for most people?

Science has indeed made life easier for most people.

Science has not made life easier for most people, but rather more difficult.


Question: Has science mostly positively influenced the quality of food in the U.S.?

Science has considerably improved the quality of food in the U.S.

Science has predominantly had a detrimental impact on the quality of food in the U.S.


Question: Has science predominantly had a positive effect on the quality of healthcare in the U.S.?

Science has predominantly enhanced the quality of healthcare in the U.S.

Science has predominantly deteriorated the quality of healthcare in the U.S.


Question: Has science mostly positively affected the quality of the environment in the U.S.?

Science has mostly improved the quality of the environment in the U.S.

Science has not mostly improved the quality of the environment in the U.S.


Question: Do you believe that government investments in basic scientific research are usually worthwhile in the long run?

Government investments in basic scientific research typically yield profitable returns in the long run.

Government investments in basic scientific research don't value for money in the long run.


Question: Do you believe that government investments in engineering and technology typically pay off in the long run?

Government investments in engineering and technology usually yield substantial long-term benefits.

The returns from government investments in engineering and technology are often not worth the initial outlay.


Question: Do you believe government investments in medical research are worth it in the long run?

Government investments in medical research are usually beneficial in the long run.

Government investments in medical research are not worth it.


Question: Is government investment essential for scientific progress, or can private investment alone ensure sufficient progress?

Government investment is essential for scientific progress.

Private investment alone can ensure sufficient scientific progress, even without government intervention.


Question: Do you support the use of animals in scientific research?

You support the use of animals in scientific research.

You oppose the use of animals in scientific research.


Question: Are organic fruits and vegetables better for one's health than conventionally grown foods?

Organic fruits and vegetables are healthier than conventionally grown foods.

Organic fruits and vegetables are not healthier than conventionally grown foods.


Question: Does eating fruits and vegetables grown with pesticides present a great deal of health risk for the average person over the course of their lifetime?

Eating fruits and vegetables grown with pesticides does present a great deal of health risk for the average person over the course of their lifetime.

Eating fruits and vegetables grown with pesticides does not present any health risk for the average person over the course of their lifetime.


Question: Does eating meat from animals that have been given antibiotics or hormones pose a significant health risk over the course of a person's lifetime?

Eating meat from animals that have been given antibiotics or hormones indeed poses a significant health risk over the course of a person's lifetime.

Eating meat from animals that have been given antibiotics or hormones does not pose any significant health risk over the course of a person's lifetime.


Question: Does consuming food and drinks with artificial coloring pose a considerable health risk for the average person over their lifetime?

Consuming food and drinks with artificial coloring presents a significant health risk over the course of a person's lifetime.

Food and drinks with artificial coloring do not present any discernible health risk throughout a person's life.


Question: Does consuming food and drinks with artificial preservatives pose a significant health risk over the course of a person's lifetime?

Consuming food and drinks with artificial preservatives presents a great deal of health risk over a lifetime.

There is no health risk at all associated with the consumption of food and drinks with artificial preservatives throughout a person's lifetime.


Question: Do you believe the average person is exposed to food additives daily which pose a serious risk to their health?

The average person eats food with additives every day, posing a serious health risk.

Although the average person eats food with additives every day, the small amount consumed does not pose a serious health risk.


Question: Do you believe foods with genetically modified ingredients are healthier than foods with no genetically modified ingredients?

Foods with genetically modified ingredients are healthier than those without them.

Foods without genetically modified ingredients are healthier than those with them.


Question: Do you believe that foods with genetically modified ingredients are better for your health than foods with no genetically modified ingredients?

Foods with genetically modified ingredients are superior in terms of health benefits compared to those without.

Foods with genetically modified ingredients are not healthier than those without genetically modified ingredients.


Question: Do you personally care a great deal about the issue of genetically modified foods?

You care a great deal about the issue of genetically modified foods.

You do not care at all about the issue of genetically modified foods.


Question: Do you believe genetically modified foods will lead to more affordably-priced food?

Genetically modified foods will indeed lead to more affordably-priced food.

Genetically modified foods will not lead to more affordably-priced food.


Question: Will genetically modified foods lead to health problems for the population as a whole?

Genetically modified foods will certainly lead to health problems for the population as a whole.

Genetically modified foods will not lead to health problems for the population as a whole.


Question: Will genetically modified foods create problems for the environment?

Genetically modified foods will create problems for the environment.

Genetically modified foods will not create problems for the environment.


Question: Will genetically modified foods increase the global food supply?

Genetically modified foods will likely increase the global food supply.

It is unlikely that genetically modified foods will increase the global food supply.


Question: Do you believe that current medical treatments are worth the costs due to their benefit on lifespan and quality of life?

Medical treatments today are valuable as they enhance life longevity and quality.

Contemporary medical treatments often bring about as many issues as they resolve.


Question: Do you believe that healthcare providers are too quick to order tests and procedures that may not be necessary?

Healthcare providers are excessively hasty to order unnecessary tests and procedures.

Healthcare providers are not too quick to order tests and procedures that may not be necessary.


Question: Do you believe that people's over-reliance on unnecessary prescription medicines is a significant problem in today's medical treatments?

People's over-reliance on unnecessary prescription medicines is a significant problem in today's medical treatments.

People's over-reliance on unnecessary prescription medicines is not a significant problem in today's medical treatments.


Question: Do you believe that new medical treatments being made available before fully understanding their effects on people's health is a big problem?

It is a significant concern that new medical treatments are released before we fully understand their impact on people's health.

It is not problematic that new medical treatments become available before we have comprehensive knowledge about their effects on people's health.


Question: Is the cost of treatments making quality medical care unaffordable?

The cost of treatments is making quality medical care unaffordable.

The cost of treatments is not making quality medical care unaffordable.


Question: Do you believe that the complexity of new medical treatments is a significant issue that prevents patients from making informed decisions?

The sophistication of current medical treatments drastically hinders patients' capability to make informed decisions.

The complexity of modern medical treatments does not obstruct patients from making informed decisions.


Question: Do side effects from prescription medicines create as many problems as the medicines solve?

Yes, side effects from prescription medicines create as many problems as the medicines solve.

No, side effects from prescription medicines do not create as many problems as the medicines solve.


Question: Is the process for evaluating the safety and effectiveness of new medical treatments too slow?

The process for evaluating the safety and effectiveness of new medical treatments is indeed too slow.

The process for evaluating the safety and effectiveness of new medical treatments is not slow.


Question: Have you heard or read about gene editing that can be used to change a baby's genetic characteristics?

You have heard or read about gene editing that can be used to change a baby's genetic characteristics.

You have not heard or read about gene editing that can be used to change a baby's genetic characteristics.


Question: Is changing a baby's genetic characteristics to make the baby more intelligent an appropriate use of medical technology?

Genetic manipulation to enhance a baby's intelligence is an appropriate use of medical technology.

Enhancing a baby's intelligence through genetic manipulation is taking medical technology too far.


Question: Is it appropriate to use medical technology to change a baby's genetic characteristics to treat a severe condition at birth?

It is appropriate to use medical technology to change a baby's genetic characteristics for treating severe conditions at birth.

Using medical technology to change a baby's genetic characteristics for treating severe conditions at birth is taking it too far.


Question: Is changing a baby's genetic characteristics to reduce the risk of a serious disease an appropriate use of medical technology?

The modification of a baby's genetic traits to reduce the risk of diseases is a suitable utilization of medical technology.

Altering a baby's genetic characteristics to lessen the possibility of a serious disease is taking medical technology too far.


Question: Do you believe that medical researchers have a good understanding of the health risks and benefits of changing a baby's genetic characteristics?

Medical researchers have a comprehensive understanding of the health risks and benefits of changing a baby's genetic characteristics.

Medical researchers do not have a sufficient understanding of the health risks and benefits of changing a baby's genetic characteristics.


Question: Is it likely that gene editing to change a baby's genetic characteristics, if widely available, will be used in morally unacceptable ways?

It is likely that gene editing for changing a baby's genetic characteristics will be used in morally unacceptable ways if it becomes widely available.

It is unlikely that gene editing to change a baby's genetic characteristics will be used in morally unacceptable ways even if it becomes widely available.


Question: Will gene editing techniques that change a baby's genetic characteristics, if widely available, likely help people live longer and better quality lives?

Gene editing techniques that change a baby's genetic characteristics will likely enhance longevity and improve life quality if they become widely available.

It's unlikely that gene editing techniques changing a baby's genetic characteristics will result in longer, better quality lives, even if widely available.


Question: Will gene editing to alter a baby's genetic characteristics be widely used before we fully understand how it affects health?

Gene editing to change a baby's genetic characteristics will be implemented widely before we fully understand its impact on health.

Gene editing to change a baby's genetic characteristics will not be used extensively until we fully understand its effects on health.


Question: Will inequality increase if gene editing to change a baby's genetic characteristics becomes widely available and is only available for the wealthy?

Inequality will indeed rise if gene editing for babies is solely available for wealthy individuals.

The introduction of gene editing for babies available only to the wealthy will not increase inequality.


Question: Will the development of gene editing techniques to change a baby's genetic characteristics pave the way for new medical advances that benefit society as a whole?

The development of these gene editing techniques will indeed open up new avenues for medical advancements beneficial to society.

The progress in gene editing techniques does not necessarily lead to new medical benefits for society.


Question: Do you believe that using gene editing to alter a baby's genetic characteristics, which requires testing on human embryos, is an appropriate use of medical technology?

Gene editing to alter a baby's genetics, necessitating embryo testing, is a suitable application of medical technology.

The use of gene editing to modify a baby's genetic traits, demanding testing on human embryos, is an overstep of medical technology boundaries.


Question: Is the genetic engineering of animals to increase protein production for more nutritious meat an appropriate use of technology?

Genetic engineering of animals for increased protein production is a fitting utilization of modern technology.

The genetic modification of animals to augment protein yields is an excessive and unnecessary application of technology.


Question: Do you believe that using technology to resurrect an extinct animal through genetically modifying a closely-related species is acceptable?

The use of technology to resurrect extinct animals by genetically modifying closely-related species is appropriate.

Utilizing technology to bring back extinct animals by genetically altering closely-related species is taking it too far.


Question: Do you consider the genetic engineering of mosquitoes to prevent their reproduction and thereby curb the spread of mosquito-borne diseases an appropriate use of technology?

Genetic engineering of mosquitoes is a suitable application of technology to prevent the spread of diseases.

The use of genetic engineering on mosquitoes is an extreme step, taking technology too far.


Question: Do you believe that using technology to genetically engineer animals for the purpose of growing human organs or tissues is appropriate?

Genetic engineering of animals to grow human organs or tissues is an appropriate use of technology.

Using technology to genetically engineer animals for growing human organs or tissues is taking technology too far.


Question: Do you believe that using technology to genetically engineer aquarium fish to glow is appropriate?

The genetic modification of aquarium fish to glow is a suitable application of technology.

Manipulating aquarium fish genetically to make them glow is an excessive use of technology.


Question: Do you believe that humans have evolved over time, or have existed in their present form since the beginning of time?

Humans have existed in their present form since the beginning of time.


Question: Do you believe that humans have evolved over time?

Humans have not evolved, but have existed in their current form since the beginning of time.


Question: Do you believe that humans have evolved over time solely due to processes such as natural selection without the involvement of God or a higher power?

I adhere to the belief that human evolution occurred solely due to processes like natural selection without any divine influence.

I am of the viewpoint that the evolution of humans involved processes guided or allowed by God or a higher power.


Question: Do you believe that humans evolved entirely through processes like natural selection without any guidance or intervention from God or a higher power?

I am convinced that humans have evolved through processes like natural selection without any divine guidance or intervention.

I don't believe that human evolution occurred solely through natural processes without any guidance or intervention from a divine power.


Question: Do you believe that humans have evolved over time solely due to natural processes without any guidance from a higher power?

I believe that humans have evolved over time exclusively due to natural processes like natural selection, free from any divine intervention.

I do not believe that evolution of humans is solely reliant on natural processes, but involves guidance or allowance by a divine power or, alternatively, humans have existed in their present form from the beginning.


Question: Do most biological scientists say that humans have evolved over time due to processes such as natural selection?

Most biological scientists affirm that human evolution over time has been driven by processes like natural selection.

Not all biological scientists believe that processes like natural selection have been the drivers of human evolution over time.


Question: Do you agree that most biological scientists say that humans have evolved over time due to processes such as natural selection, and not that humans have existed in their present form since the beginning of time?

Most biological scientists assert that humans have evolved over time due to processes such as natural selection.

It's incorrect to say that most biological scientists believe humans have existed in their present form since the beginning of time.


Question: Do you consider it essential for someone in high political office to be honest and ethical?

It is essential for high-ranking political figures to uphold honesty and ethics.

It is not necessary for high-ranking political figures to always be honest and ethical.


Question: Is it essential for you that someone in high political office be compassionate and empathetic?

It is essential for someone in high political office to be compassionate and empathetic.

It is not essential for someone in high political office to be compassionate and empathetic.


Question: Is it essential for you that someone in high political office is able to work out compromises?

It is essential for me that someone in high political office is able to work out compromises.

It is not essential for me that someone in high political office is able to work out compromises.


Question: Is it essential for you that someone in high political office works well under pressure?

It is essential for high-ranking politicians to work well under pressure.

Working well under pressure is not essential for high-ranking politicians.


Question: Do you consider it essential for someone in high political office to be willing to take risks?

You believe it is essential for someone in high political office to be willing to take risks.

You do not consider it essential for someone in high political office to be willing to take risks.


Question: Do you consider it essential for someone in high political office to stand up for what they believe in, despite political pressure?

It is crucial for someone in high political office to firmly uphold their beliefs under any political pressure.

The importance of someone in high political office standing up for their beliefs despite political pressure is not a necessity.


Question: Do you consider it essential for someone in high political office to be persuasive?

It is essential for someone in high political office to be persuasive.

It is not essential for someone in high political office to be persuasive.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for someone in high political office to maintain a tone of civility and respect in politics?

It is fundamental for someone in a high political office to uphold a respectful and civil tone in politics.

Upholding civility and respectful tone in politics is not necessary for someone in high political office.


Question: Do you consider it essential for someone in high political office to serve as a role model for children?

It is essential for individuals in high political office to serve as role models for children.

It is not essential for individuals in high political office to serve as role models for children.


Question: Do you consider it essential for someone in a top executive business position to be honest and ethical?

It is essential for a top executive in business to be honest and ethical.

It is not essential for a top executive in business to be honest and ethical.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for someone in a top executive business position to be compassionate and empathetic?

It is essential for top business executives to possess compassion and empathy.

Compassion and empathy are not essential qualities for top business executives.


Question: Do you consider it essential for someone in a top executive business position to be able to work out compromises?

It is essential for a top executive in a business position to be capable of working out compromises.

It is not necessary for someone in a top executive business position to be able to work out compromises.


Question: Is it essential for someone in a top executive business position to work well under pressure?

It is essential for top executives to work well under pressure.

It's not essential for top executives to work well under pressure.


Question: Do you consider it essential for someone in a top executive business position to be willing to take risks?

It is essential for top business executives to be willing to take risks.

It is not essential for top business executives to be willing to take risks.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for someone in a top executive business position to value people from different backgrounds?

It is essential for top executive business positions to value diversity.

Diversity in top executive business positions is not vital.


Question: Is it essential for you that someone in a top executive business position provides fair pay and good benefits?

It is essential for me that a top executive provides fair pay and good benefits.

It is not essential for me that a top executive provides fair pay and good benefits.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for someone in a top executive business position to negotiate profitable deals?

It is essential for top executives to negotiate profitable deals.

It is not essential for top executives to negotiate profitable deals.


Question: Is it essential for you that someone in a top executive business position considers the impact of their business decisions on society?

It is essential for top executives to consider the societal impact of their business decisions.

It is not essential for top executives to consider the societal impact of their business decisions.


Question: Is it essential for someone in a top executive business position to provide guidance or mentorship to young employees?

It is essential for top executives to mentor young employees.

It is not essential for top executives to mentor young employees.


Question: Do you consider it essential for someone in a top executive business position to create a safe and respectful workplace?

I deem it essential for a top executive to create a safe and respectful workplace.

I do not find it essential for a top executive to create a safe and respectful workplace.


Question: Do you believe it is essential for someone in a top executive business position to stand up for what they believe in, despite pressure to make a profit?

I strongly believe that it is essential for top executives to stand up for their beliefs, even under profit pressures.

I do not think it is essential for top executives to prioritize their beliefs over the pressure to make profit.


Question: Do you believe that men and women have essentially similar leadership styles?

Men and women have fundamentally similar leadership styles.

Men and women do not have fundamentally similar leadership styles.


Question: Do women generally have a better approach to leadership in top positions in business and politics than men?

Women usually adopt a superior approach in leadership roles in business and politics than men.

Women do not typically demonstrate a superior approach to leadership in high-level business and politics when compared to men.


Question: Do you believe there are too many women in high political offices?

There are too many women in high political offices.

There are not too many women in high political offices.


Question: Do you think there should be more women than men in high political office?

It is crucial to have more women than men in high political office to promote gender balance.

Having more women than men in high political office can disrupt the current equilibrium.


Question: Do you believe there are too many women in top executive business positions?

There are excessively many women occupying top executive business positions.

There are not excessively many women in top executive business positions.


Question: Do you believe that ideally there should be more women than men in top executive business positions?

More women should ideally occupy top executive business positions than men.

It is not ideal for more women to occupy top executive business positions than men.


Question: Is it generally easier for men to get top executive positions in business these days?

Men generally have an easier time securing top executive positions in business these days.

It's not significantly easier for men to secure top executive positions in business these days.


Question: Is it generally easier for men to get elected to high political offices than women?

Men typically have an easier time getting elected to high political offices.

It is not easier for men to get elected to high political offices than it is for women.


Question: Do you believe that as more women run for office, it will only be a matter of time before there are as many women as men in high political office?

More women running for offices will eventually result in equal numbers of men and women in high political offices.

Despite more women running for office, men will continue to dominate high political offices in the future.


Question: Do you believe that women will eventually hold as many top executive positions as men in business as they continue to move into management roles?

The rise in women moving into management roles indicates that they will eventually hold as many top executive positions as men in business.

Despite more women moving into management roles, men will continue to dominate the top executive positions in business.


Question: Do you believe that having more women in top leadership positions in business and government would significantly improve the quality of life for women?

More women in top leadership positions in business and government would notably enhance the quality of life for women.

Having more women in top leadership roles in business and government wouldn't markedly improve the quality of life for women.


Question: Do you believe having more women in top leadership positions in business and government would significantly improve the quality of life for men?

Having more women in top leadership positions in business and government would significantly improve the quality of life for men.

Having more women in top leadership positions in business and government would not significantly improve the quality of life for men.


Question: Do you believe that having more women in top leadership positions in business and government would significantly improve the quality of life for all Americans?

Having more women in top leadership positions would significantly enhance the quality of life for all Americans.

Having more women in top leadership positions would not substantially improve the quality of life for all Americans.


Question: Do you believe that many Americans aren't ready to elect a woman to higher office is a major reason why there are fewer women than men in high political offices?

Many Americans are indeed not ready to elect a woman to higher office, significantly contributing to the fewer number of women than men in these positions.

The readiness of Americans to elect a woman to higher office does not majorly contribute to the lesser number of women in high political offices.


Question: Do you believe that gender discrimination is a major reason for there being fewer women than men in high political offices?

Gender discrimination is widely considered a major reason why there are fewer women than men in high political offices.

It is not believed that gender discrimination is a major reason for the dearth of women in high political offices.


Question: Do you believe that family responsibilities make it harder for women to run for higher office?

Family responsibilities conceive obstacles for women to run for higher office.

Family responsibilities do not hinder women from running for higher office.


Question: Do you believe that women aren't tough enough for politics, which is a reason why there are fewer women than men in high political offices?

Women not being tough enough for politics is a significant factor in the underrepresentation of women in high political offices.

The underrepresentation of women in high political offices is not due to them not being tough enough for politics.


Question: Do you believe that fewer women have the required experience for higher office, which is a reason for the fewer number of women than men in high political offices?

I believe that the smaller number of women in high political offices is due to the lack of their experience needed for such positions.

I do not consider the lack of experience among women as a reason for their lesser representation in high political offices.


Question: Do you believe that women getting less support from party leaders is a major reason for there being fewer women than men in high political offices?

Women being less supported by party leaders is a significant factor contributing to the underrepresentation of women in high political roles.

The lack of support from party leaders is not a primary reason causing the lower number of women than men in high political offices.


Question: Do you believe that women running for office being held to higher standards than men is a major reason for there being fewer women in high political offices?

Women running for office are indeed held to higher standards than men, which significantly contributes to the under-representation of women in high political offices.

Women being held to higher standards when running for office is not a significant reason for the scarcity of women in high political offices.


Question: Do you believe that women who run for office having to prove themselves more than men is a major reason for the fewer number of women than men in high political offices?

Women having to prove themselves more indeed significantly contributes to the underrepresentation of women in high political offices.

The need for women to prove themselves more is not a major reason behind the fewer number of women in high political offices.


Question: Do you believe that fewer women are interested in holding higher office, resulting in fewer women than men in high political offices?

The under-representation of women in high political offices is due majorly to fewer women being interested in such positions.

The notion that fewer women are interested in higher office does not contribute to the lack of women in high political positions.


Question: Do you believe that one of the reasons there are fewer women than men in high political offices is because women aren't encouraged to pursue leadership positions from an early age?

Yes, the underrepresentation of women in high political offices is largely due to the lack of encouragement for women to pursue leadership positions from an early age.

No, the lack of encouragement for women to pursue leadership positions from an early age is not a significant reason for the fewer number of women in high political offices.


Question: Do you think that women not doing as good of a job selling their accomplishments is a major reason why there are fewer women than men in high political offices?

Yes, women's less effective self-promotion of their accomplishments is a major factor in the gender disparity in high political offices.

No, women's ability to sell their accomplishments is not a main cause for the underrepresentation of women in high political offices.


Question: Do you believe that sexual harassment is a major reason why there are fewer women than men in high political offices?

Sexual harassment significantly contributes to fewer women being in high political offices.

Sexual harassment does not play a major role in the number of women in high political offices.


Question: Do you believe that many businesses are not ready to hire women for top executive positions?

Many businesses are indeed not ready to hire women for top executive positions.

The readiness of businesses to hire women for top executive positions is not a major issue.


Question: Do you believe that gender discrimination is a major reason why there aren't more women in top executive business positions?

Gender discrimination significantly contributes to the lack of women in top executive business positions.

Gender discrimination is not a major factor in the dearth of women in top executive business positions.


Question: Do you believe that family responsibilities make it harder for women to move up in business?

Family responsibilities do limit women's advancement in top executive positions.

Family responsibilities do not obstruct women's rise to top executive positions.


Question: Do you believe that the lack of women in top executive business positions is because women aren't tough enough for business?

The absence of women in top executive business roles is due to them not being tough enough for business.

Women's toughness for business is not a factor that accounts for their lesser representation in top executive positions.


Question: Do you think that the perception that women don't make as good managers as men is a major reason why there aren't more women in top executive business positions?

The belief that women aren't effective managers is a major reason limiting the number of women in top executive roles.

The perception that women aren't as good managers as men is not a significant factor preventing more women from holding top executive positions.


Question: Do you believe that women are held to higher standards than men as a major reason why there aren't more women in top executive business positions?

Women being held to higher standards than men greatly contributes to the shortage of women in top executive business positions.

The notion that women being held to higher standards than men is a major reason for their limited presence in executive roles is not correct.


Question: Do you believe that women having to prove themselves more than men is a major reason why there aren't more women in top executive business positions?

Women having to prove themselves more than men is a significant barrier to their entry into top executive positions.

The requirement for women to prove themselves more than men does not significantly limit their ascent to top executive positions.


Question: Do you believe that not as many women are interested in top executive business positions is a reason why there aren't more women in these positions?

I believe that women's lesser interest in top executive business positions is a reason for their underrepresentation in these roles.

I do not believe that a lack of interest among women in top executive business positions is a reason for their underrepresentation.


Question: Do you believe that the lack of encouragement for women to pursue leadership positions from an early age is a major reason why there aren't more women in top executive business positions?

The lack of encouragement for women to pursue leadership positions from a young age is a major reason for their underrepresentation in top executive business positions.

The underrepresentation of women in top business executive positions is not majorly due to the lack of encouragement for women to pursue leadership roles from an early age.


Question: Do you believe that there aren't more women in top executive business positions because women don't do as good of a job selling their accomplishments?

Yes, the under-representation of women in top executive positions is due to their less effective promotion of their achievements.

No, the lack of women in top executive positions is not a result of women failing to sell their accomplishments effectively.


Question: Do you believe that the lack of access to the same kinds of personal networks and connections that men have is a major reason why there aren't more women in top executive business positions?

Access to the same kinds of personal networks and connections that men have is a major reason for the lack of women in top executive business positions.

Access to the same kinds of personal networks and connections that men have is not a major reason for the lack of women in top executive business positions.


Question: Do you believe that the reason there aren't more women in top executive business positions is because women have fewer opportunities to interact with people in senior positions outside of work?

Women's limited opportunities to interact with people in senior positions outside of work contribute to their underrepresentation in top executive business positions.

The underrepresentation of women in top executive business positions is not due to their limited opportunities to interact with people in senior positions outside of work.


Question: Do you believe that women being less likely than men to ask for promotions and raises is a major reason why there aren't more women in top executive business positions?

I believe that women being less likely than men to ask for promotions and raises is a major reason for the scarcity of women in top executive business positions.

I do not believe that women's likelihood to ask less frequently for promotions and raises is a major factor contributing to their underrepresentation in top executive business positions.


Question: Do you believe that sexual harassment creates an environment that makes it harder for women to succeed in top executive business positions?

Sexual harassment significantly contributes to the difficulty women face in achieving top executive business positions.

Sexual harassment does not impact the lack of women in top executive business positions.


Question: Do you believe the higher education system, that is colleges and universities, in the United States today is heading in the right direction?

The higher education system in the United States is heading in the right direction.

The higher education system in the United States is not heading in the right direction.


Question: Do you believe high tuition costs are a major reason why the higher education system in the U.S. is going in the wrong direction?

High tuition costs are a major reason the U.S. higher education system is going in the wrong direction.

High tuition costs are not a major reason the U.S. higher education system is going in the wrong direction.


Question: Do you believe that professors bringing their political and social views into the classroom is a major reason why the higher education system in the U.S. is going in the wrong direction?

Professors incorporating their political and social views into their lectures greatly contributes to the deteriorating state of the U.S. higher education system.

The way professors include their political and social perspectives in teaching is not significantly causing the U.S. higher education system's direction to worsen.


Question: Do you believe that colleges and universities' excessive concern about protecting students from potentially offensive views is a reason the U.S. higher education system is going in the wrong direction?

This person agrees that the overprotectiveness of colleges and universities towards potentially offensive views contributes to the downturn of the U.S. higher education system.

This person does not believe that the excessive concern of colleges and universities in protecting students from potentially offensive views is negatively impacting the U.S. higher education system.