Update README.md

README.md

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ FNet-base was fine-tuned and evaluated on the validation data of the [GLUE bench
 For comparison, this model (ported to PyTorch) was fine-tuned and evaluated using the [official Hugging Face GLUE evaluation scripts](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/tree/master/examples/pytorch/text-classification#glue-tasks) alongside [bert-base-cased](https://hf.co/models/bert-base-cased) for comparison.
 The training was done on a single 16GB NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPU. For MRPC/WNLI, the models were trained for 5 epochs, while for other tasks, the models were trained for 3 epochs. A sequence length of 512 was used with batch size 16 and learning rate 2e-5.
 
-The following table summarizes the results for [fnet-base](https://huggingface.co/google/fnet-base) (called *FNet (PyTorch) - Reproduced*) and [bert-base-cased](https://hf.co/models/bert-base-cased) (called *Bert (PyTorch) - Reproduced*) in terms of training times. The format is *hour:min:seconds*.
+The following table summarizes the results for [fnet-base](https://huggingface.co/google/fnet-base) (called *FNet (PyTorch) - Reproduced*) and [bert-base-cased](https://hf.co/models/bert-base-cased) (called *Bert (PyTorch) - Reproduced*) in terms of **fine-tuning** speed. The format is *hour:min:seconds*. **Note** that the authors compared **pre-traning** speed in [the official paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03824) instead.
 
 | Task/Model | FNet-base (PyTorch) |Bert-base (PyTorch)|
 |:----:|:-----------:|:----:|