--- license: apache-2.0 library_name: transformers tags: - storm - mistral - openchat - RLAIF - reward model --- # Storm-7B - **Developed by**: [Jie Liu](https://jieliu.site/) \\(^{*1,2}\\), [Zhanhui Zhou](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=SbACfYQAAAAJ&hl=zh-CN) \\(^{*2}\\), [Chao Yang](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=5KRbHPMAAAAJ&hl=zh-CN) \\(^{2}\\), [Han-Sen Zhong](https://scholar.google.com.hk/citations?user=X_ZfX8sAAAAJ&hl=zh-CN) \\(^{2}\\), [Wanli Ouyang](https://wlouyang.github.io/) \\(^{1,2}\\). - \\(^{1}\\)MMLab, The Chinese University of Hong Kong   \\(^{2}\\)Shanghai AI Laboratory ## Introduction We released Storm-7B, the first open-source language model comparable to the GPT-4 series on the [AlpacaEval 2.0](https://tatsu-lab.github.io/alpaca_eval/) leaderboard, ranking 3rd in length-controlled win rate. The recipe for this model is simple: 1) fine-tuning from [Openchat-3.5-0106](https://huggingface.co/openchat/openchat-3.5-0106), 2) applying iterative DPO training, a variant of DPO where a language model iteratively learns from the preferences of the trained reward model. We will release our technical report and code as soon as possible. A snapshot of the AlpacaEval 2.0 leaderboard (2024/4/28) is listed below: | | **LC Win Rate** | **Win Rate** | | :----------------------: | :-------------: | :----------: | | GPT-4 Turbo (04/09) | 55.0% | 46.1% | | GPT-4 Preview (11/06) | 50.0% | 50.0% | | **Storm-7B** | 48.9% | 52.5% | | Nanbeige Plus Chat v0.1 | 44.5% | 56.7% | | Qwen1.5 110B Chat | 43.9% | 33.8% | | Aligner 2B+Claude 3 Opus | 41.8% | 34.5% | | Claude 3 Opus (02/29) | 40.5% | 29.1% | | GPT-4 | 38.1% | 23.6% | | openchat-3.5-0106 | 15.4% | 10.1% | Please refer to the [leaderboard webpage](https://tatsu-lab.github.io/alpaca_eval/) for up-to-date results. We also conducted preliminary evaluations on other benchmarks and observed no significant degradation. | | ARC | HellaSwag | MMLU | TruthfulQA | Winogrande | Avg. | | ----------------- | ----- | --------- | ----- | ---------- | ---------- | ----- | | **Storm-7B** | 67.58 | 80.97 | 62.21 | 57.24 | 80.51 | 69.70 | | openchat-3.5-0106 | 66.38 | 83.00 | 63.47 | 52.55 | 81.06 | 69.29 | | internlm2-7b | 58.02 | 81.24 | 65.24 | 48.73 | 83.82 | 67.41 | | gemma-7B | 61.09 | 82.20 | 64.56 | 44.79 | 79.01 | 66.33 | | Yi-9B | 61.18 | 78.82 | 70.06 | 42.45 | 77.51 | 66.00 | | Meta-Llama-3-8B | 59.47 | 82.09 | 66.69 | 43.90 | 77.35 | 65.90 | | Mistral-7B-v0.1 | 59.98 | 83.31 | 64.16 | 42.15 | 78.37 | 65.59 | | Qwen-7b | 51.37 | 78.47 | 59.84 | 47.79 | 72.69 | 62.03 | ## Uses Our model uses the same chat template as [Openchat-3.5-0106](https://huggingface.co/openchat/openchat-3.5-0106). A sample code snippet for inference using our model is provided below. ```python from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer device = "cuda" model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("jieliu/Storm-7B").to(device) tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("jieliu/Storm-7B") model.eval().requires_grad_(False) def generate_response(prompt): input_ids = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt").input_ids.to(device) outputs = model.generate( input_ids, max_length=2048, do_sample=True, temperature=1.0, pad_token_id=tokenizer.pad_token_id, eos_token_id=tokenizer.eos_token_id, ) response_ids = outputs[0] response_text = tokenizer.decode(response_ids, skip_special_tokens=True) return response_text prompt = "How does a telescope work?" input_prompt = f"GPT4 Correct User: {prompt}<|end_of_turn|>GPT4 Correct Assistant:" response_text = generate_response(input_prompt) print("Response:", response_text) ``` ## Scripts You can reproduce our results on AlphaEval 2.0 using the script provided below. ```bash git clone https://github.com/tatsu-lab/alpaca_eval.git cd alpaca_eval pip install -e . export OPENAI_API_KEY= alpaca_eval evaluate_from_model --model_configs 'Storm-7B' ``` ## Limitations Storm-7B is a quick demonstration that a language model, fine-tuned with AI feedback, can easily surpass or match state-of-the-art models, as assessed by the same AI feedback. However, this improvement on the automatic leaderboard may not necessarily indicate better alignment with human intentions. Our model therefore represents a critical, preliminary reevaluation of the RLAIF paradigm, questioning how much learning from and being evaluated by AI feedback aligns with actual human preferences. ## Citation ``` @misc{liu2024storm, title = {Storm-7B}, url = {}, author = {Jie Liu and Zhanhui Zhou and Chao Yang and Han-Sen Zhong and Wanli Ouyang}, month = {April}, year = {2024} } ```