Update README.md

README.md

@@ -13,19 +13,22 @@ https://hf.co/jondurbin/airoboros-65b-gpt4-1.4
 
 ### Licence and usage restrictions
 
-This model was built on llama-2, which has a proprietary/custom Meta license.
-- See the LICENSE.txt file attached for the original license, along with USE_POLICY.md which was also provided by Meta.
+Base model has a custom Meta license:
+- See the [meta-license/LICENSE.txt](/meta-license/LICENSE.txt) file attached for the original license provided by Meta.
+- See also [meta-license/USE_POLICY.md](/meta-license/USE_POLICY.md) and [meta-license/Responsible-Use-Guide.pdf](meta-license/Responsible-Use-Guide.pdf), also provided by Meta.
 
-The data used to fine-tune the llama-2-70b-hf model was generated by GPT4 via OpenAI API calls.using [airoboros](https://github.com/jondurbin/airoboros)
-- The ToS for OpenAI API usage has a clause preventing the output from being used to train a model that __competes__ with OpenAI
-  - what does *compete* actually mean here?
-  - these small open source models will not produce output anywhere near the quality of gpt-4, or even gpt-3.5, so I can't imagine this could credibly be considered competing in the first place
-  - if someone else uses the dataset to do the same, they wouldn't necessarily be violating the ToS because they didn't call the API, so I don't know how that works
-  - the training data used in essentially all large language models includes a significant amount of copyrighted or otherwise non-permissive licensing in the first place
-  - other work using the self-instruct method, e.g. the original here: https://github.com/yizhongw/self-instruct released the data and model as apache-2
+The fine-tuning data was generated by OpenAI API calls to gpt-4, via [airoboros](https://github.com/jondurbin/airoboros)
 
-I am purposingly leaving this license ambiguous (other than the fact you must comply with the Meta original license) because I am not a lawyer and refuse to attempt to interpret all of the terms accordingly.
+The ToS for OpenAI API usage has a clause preventing the output from being used to train a model that __competes__ with OpenAI
+
+- what does *compete* actually mean here?
+- these small open source models will not produce output anywhere near the quality of gpt-4, or even gpt-3.5, so I can't imagine this could credibly be considered competing in the first place
+- if someone else uses the dataset to do the same, they wouldn't necessarily be violating the ToS because they didn't call the API, so I don't know how that works
+- the training data used in essentially all large language models includes a significant amount of copyrighted or otherwise non-permissive licensing in the first place
+- other work using the self-instruct method, e.g. the original here: https://github.com/yizhongw/self-instruct released the data and model as apache-2
+
+I am purposingly leaving this license ambiguous (other than the fact you must comply with the Meta original license for llama-2) because I am not a lawyer and refuse to attempt to interpret all of the terms accordingly.
 
 Your best bet is probably to avoid using this commercially due to the OpenAI API usage.
 
-Either way, by using this model, you agree to completely idemnify me from any and all license related issues.
+Either way, by using this model, you agree to completely idemnify me.