VideoAutoArena: An Automated Arena for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models in Video Analysis through User Simulation
Abstract
Large multimodal models (LMMs) with advanced video analysis capabilities have recently garnered significant attention. However, most evaluations rely on traditional methods like multiple-choice questions in benchmarks such as VideoMME and LongVideoBench, which are prone to lack the depth needed to capture the complex demands of real-world users. To address this limitation-and due to the prohibitive cost and slow pace of human annotation for video tasks-we introduce VideoAutoArena, an arena-style benchmark inspired by LMSYS Chatbot Arena's framework, designed to automatically assess LMMs' video analysis abilities. VideoAutoArena utilizes user simulation to generate open-ended, adaptive questions that rigorously assess model performance in video understanding. The benchmark features an automated, scalable evaluation framework, incorporating a modified ELO Rating System for fair and continuous comparisons across multiple LMMs. To validate our automated judging system, we construct a 'gold standard' using a carefully curated subset of human annotations, demonstrating that our arena strongly aligns with human judgment while maintaining scalability. Additionally, we introduce a fault-driven evolution strategy, progressively increasing question complexity to push models toward handling more challenging video analysis scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that VideoAutoArena effectively differentiates among state-of-the-art LMMs, providing insights into model strengths and areas for improvement. To further streamline our evaluation, we introduce VideoAutoBench as an auxiliary benchmark, where human annotators label winners in a subset of VideoAutoArena battles. We use GPT-4o as a judge to compare responses against these human-validated answers. Together, VideoAutoArena and VideoAutoBench offer a cost-effective, and scalable framework for evaluating LMMs in user-centric video analysis.
Community
We choose top-10 models (w/ their smaller-size variants) on Video-MME (cutoff 15 Oct 24) as arena players, and here are their Arena Elo results, suggesting a larger gap on user-faced video analysis than video MCQs.
Models | Size | Frames | ELO | Win Rates | (8s, 15s) | (15s, 60s) | (180s, 600s) | (900s, 3600s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPT-4o | - | 64 | 1505.7 | 89.2 | 1447.9 | 1449.6 | 1575.3 | 1552.2 |
GPT-4o-mini | - | 64 | 1323.3 | 76.9 | 1293.3 | 1343.3 | 1327.8 | 1349.3 |
Gemini-1.5-Pro | - | 64 | 1187.0 | 65.1 | 1247.7 | 1171.8 | 1263.6 | 1291.6 |
Gemini-1.5-Flash | - | 64 | 1149.5 | 62.1 | 1081.6 | 1131.3 | 1140.1 | 1260.4 |
Aria | 8×3.5B | 64 | 1120.0 | 59.5 | 1147.5 | 1273.8 | 1110.7 | 1111.4 |
Qwen2-VL | 72B | 64 | 886.5 | 35.6 | 985.5 | 928.2 | 829.6 | 826.6 |
Qwen2-VL | 7B | 64 | 875.6 | 34.9 | 969.3 | 859.3 | 850.3 | 829.2 |
LLaVA-Video | 72B | 64 | 836.6 | 30.3 | 796.9 | 850.1 | 827.9 | 782.5 |
LLaVA-Video | 7B | 64 | 765.6 | 23.5 | 672.4 | 736.1 | 759.1 | 721.8 |
LLaVA-OneVision | 72B | 64 | 763.7 | 23.1 | 731.5 | 710.6 | 759.3 | 741.8 |
LLaVA-OneVision | 7B | 64 | 586.5 | 9.9 | 626.7 | 545.8 | 556.3 | 533.2 |
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- TOMATO: Assessing Visual Temporal Reasoning Capabilities in Multimodal Foundation Models (2024)
- LOKI: A Comprehensive Synthetic Data Detection Benchmark using Large Multimodal Models (2024)
- VidComposition: Can MLLMs Analyze Compositions in Compiled Videos? (2024)
- Q-Bench-Video: Benchmarking the Video Quality Understanding of LMMs (2024)
- VCBench: A Controllable Benchmark for Symbolic and Abstract Challenges in Video Cognition (2024)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper