Spaces:
Running
Running
MilesCranmer
commited on
Commit
•
399aef5
1
Parent(s):
0d82add
Add subtraction operator
Browse files- TODO.md +3 -0
- docs/operators.md +1 -1
- julia/operators.jl +1 -0
- pysr/sr.py +1 -0
TODO.md
CHANGED
@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@
|
|
78 |
|
79 |
## Algorithmic performance ideas:
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
- [ ] Idea: use gradient of equation with respect to each operator (perhaps simply add to each operator) to tell which part is the most "sensitive" to changes. Then, perhaps insert/delete/mutate on that part of the tree?
|
82 |
- [ ] Start populations staggered; so that there is more frequent printing (and pops that start a bit later get hall of fame already)?
|
83 |
- [ ] Consider adding mutation for constant<->variable
|
@@ -93,6 +95,7 @@
|
|
93 |
|
94 |
## Code performance ideas:
|
95 |
|
|
|
96 |
- [ ] Try defining a binary tree as an array, rather than a linked list. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/6384714/2689923
|
97 |
- [ ] Add true multi-node processing, with MPI, or just file sharing. Multiple populations per core.
|
98 |
- Ongoing in cluster branch
|
|
|
78 |
|
79 |
## Algorithmic performance ideas:
|
80 |
|
81 |
+
- [ ] When doing equation warmup, only migrate those equations with almost the same complexity. Rather than having to consider simple equations later in the game.
|
82 |
+
- [ ] Right now we only update the score based on some. Need to update score based on entire data! Note that optimizer only is used sometimes.
|
83 |
- [ ] Idea: use gradient of equation with respect to each operator (perhaps simply add to each operator) to tell which part is the most "sensitive" to changes. Then, perhaps insert/delete/mutate on that part of the tree?
|
84 |
- [ ] Start populations staggered; so that there is more frequent printing (and pops that start a bit later get hall of fame already)?
|
85 |
- [ ] Consider adding mutation for constant<->variable
|
|
|
95 |
|
96 |
## Code performance ideas:
|
97 |
|
98 |
+
- [ ] How hard is it to turn the recursive array evaluation into a for loop?
|
99 |
- [ ] Try defining a binary tree as an array, rather than a linked list. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/6384714/2689923
|
100 |
- [ ] Add true multi-node processing, with MPI, or just file sharing. Multiple populations per core.
|
101 |
- Ongoing in cluster branch
|
docs/operators.md
CHANGED
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ of these and other valid operators are stated below.
|
|
8 |
|
9 |
**Binary**
|
10 |
|
11 |
-
`plus`, `mult`, `pow`, `div`, `greater`, `mod`, `beta`, `logical_or`,
|
12 |
`logical_and`
|
13 |
|
14 |
**Unary**
|
|
|
8 |
|
9 |
**Binary**
|
10 |
|
11 |
+
`plus`, `sub`, `mult`, `pow`, `div`, `greater`, `mod`, `beta`, `logical_or`,
|
12 |
`logical_and`
|
13 |
|
14 |
**Unary**
|
julia/operators.jl
CHANGED
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ import SpecialFunctions: gamma, lgamma, erf, erfc, beta
|
|
2 |
|
3 |
# Define allowed operators. Any julia operator can also be used.
|
4 |
plus(x::Float32, y::Float32)::Float32 = x+y #Do not change the name of this operator.
|
|
|
5 |
mult(x::Float32, y::Float32)::Float32 = x*y #Do not change the name of this operator.
|
6 |
pow(x::Float32, y::Float32)::Float32 = sign(x)*abs(x)^y
|
7 |
div(x::Float32, y::Float32)::Float32 = x/y
|
|
|
2 |
|
3 |
# Define allowed operators. Any julia operator can also be used.
|
4 |
plus(x::Float32, y::Float32)::Float32 = x+y #Do not change the name of this operator.
|
5 |
+
sub(x::Float32, y::Float32)::Float32 = x-y #Do not change the name of this operator.
|
6 |
mult(x::Float32, y::Float32)::Float32 = x*y #Do not change the name of this operator.
|
7 |
pow(x::Float32, y::Float32)::Float32 = sign(x)*abs(x)^y
|
8 |
div(x::Float32, y::Float32)::Float32 = x/y
|
pysr/sr.py
CHANGED
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ sympy_mappings = {
|
|
17 |
'div': lambda x, y : x/y,
|
18 |
'mult': lambda x, y : x*y,
|
19 |
'plus': lambda x, y : x + y,
|
|
|
20 |
'neg': lambda x : -x,
|
21 |
'pow': lambda x, y : sympy.sign(x)*abs(x)**y,
|
22 |
'cos': lambda x : sympy.cos(x),
|
|
|
17 |
'div': lambda x, y : x/y,
|
18 |
'mult': lambda x, y : x*y,
|
19 |
'plus': lambda x, y : x + y,
|
20 |
+
'sub': lambda x, y : x - y,
|
21 |
'neg': lambda x : -x,
|
22 |
'pow': lambda x, y : sympy.sign(x)*abs(x)**y,
|
23 |
'cos': lambda x : sympy.cos(x),
|