emilylearning's picture
first commit
bd64c46
raw
history blame
11.6 kB
import gradio as gr
import torch
from transformers import AutoModelForTokenClassification, AutoTokenizer
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
# Play with me, consts
CONDITIONING_VARIABLES = ["none", "birth_place", "birth_date", "name"]
FEMALE_WEIGHTS = [1.5, 5] # About 5x more male than female tokens in dataset
# Internal consts
START_YEAR = 1800
STOP_YEAR = 1999
SPLIT_KEY = "DATE"
DEVICE = torch.device("cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")
MAX_TOKEN_LENGTH = 128
NON_LOSS_TOKEN_ID = -100
NON_GENDERED_TOKEN_ID = 30 # Picked an int that will pop out visually
LABEL_DICT = {"female": 9, "male": -9} # Picked an int that will pop out visually
CLASSES = list(LABEL_DICT.keys())
# Fire up the models
models_paths = dict()
models = dict()
base_path = "emilylearning/"
for var in CONDITIONING_VARIABLES:
for f_weight in FEMALE_WEIGHTS:
if f_weight == 1.5:
models_paths[(var, f_weight)] = (
base_path
+ f"finetuned_cgp_added_{var}__female_weight_{f_weight}__test_run_False__p_dataset_100"
)
else:
models_paths[(var, f_weight)] = (
base_path
+ f"finetuned_cgp_add_{var}__f_weight_{f_weight}__p_dataset_100__test_False"
)
models[(var, f_weight)] = AutoModelForTokenClassification.from_pretrained(
models_paths[(var, f_weight)]
)
# Tokenizers same for each model, so just grabbing one of them
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(
models_paths[(CONDITIONING_VARIABLES[0], FEMALE_WEIGHTS[0])], add_prefix_space=True
)
MASK_TOKEN_ID = tokenizer.mask_token_id
# more static stuff
gendered_lists = [
["he", "she"],
["him", "her"],
["his", "hers"],
["male", "female"],
["man", "woman"],
["men", "women"],
["husband", "wife"],
]
male_gendered_dict = {list[0]: list for list in gendered_lists}
female_gendered_dict = {list[1]: list for list in gendered_lists}
male_gendered_token_ids = tokenizer.convert_tokens_to_ids(
list(male_gendered_dict.keys())
)
female_gendered_token_ids = tokenizer.convert_tokens_to_ids(
list(female_gendered_dict.keys())
)
assert tokenizer.unk_token_id not in male_gendered_token_ids
assert tokenizer.unk_token_id not in female_gendered_token_ids
label_list = list(LABEL_DICT.values())
assert label_list[0] == LABEL_DICT["female"], "LABEL_DICT not an ordered dict"
label2id = {label: idx for idx, label in enumerate(label_list)}
# Prepare text
def tokenize_and_append_metadata(text, tokenizer):
tokenized = tokenizer(
text,
truncation=True,
padding=True,
max_length=MAX_TOKEN_LENGTH,
)
# Finding the gender pronouns in the tokens
token_ids = tokenized["input_ids"]
female_tags = torch.tensor(
[
LABEL_DICT["female"]
if id in female_gendered_token_ids
else NON_GENDERED_TOKEN_ID
for id in token_ids
]
)
male_tags = torch.tensor(
[
LABEL_DICT["male"]
if id in male_gendered_token_ids
else NON_GENDERED_TOKEN_ID
for id in token_ids
]
)
# Labeling and masking out occurrences of gendered pronouns
labels = torch.tensor([NON_LOSS_TOKEN_ID] * len(token_ids))
labels = torch.where(
female_tags == LABEL_DICT["female"],
label2id[LABEL_DICT["female"]],
NON_LOSS_TOKEN_ID,
)
labels = torch.where(
male_tags == LABEL_DICT["male"], label2id[LABEL_DICT["male"]], labels
)
masked_token_ids = torch.where(
female_tags == LABEL_DICT["female"], MASK_TOKEN_ID, torch.tensor(token_ids)
)
masked_token_ids = torch.where(
male_tags == LABEL_DICT["male"], MASK_TOKEN_ID, masked_token_ids
)
tokenized["input_ids"] = masked_token_ids
tokenized["labels"] = labels
return tokenized
# Run inference
def predict_gender_pronouns(
num_points, conditioning_variables, f_weights, input_text, return_preds=False
):
text_portions = input_text.split(SPLIT_KEY)
years = np.linspace(START_YEAR, STOP_YEAR, int(num_points)).astype(int)
dfs = []
dfs.append(pd.DataFrame({"year": years}))
for f_weight in f_weights:
for var in conditioning_variables:
prefix = f"w{f_weight}_{var}"
model = models[(var, f_weight)]
p_female = []
p_male = []
for b_date in years:
target_text = f"{b_date}".join(text_portions)
tokenized_sample = tokenize_and_append_metadata(
target_text,
tokenizer=tokenizer,
)
ids = tokenized_sample["input_ids"]
atten_mask = torch.tensor(tokenized_sample["attention_mask"])
toks = tokenizer.convert_ids_to_tokens(ids)
labels = tokenized_sample["labels"]
with torch.no_grad():
outputs = model(ids.unsqueeze(dim=0), atten_mask.unsqueeze(dim=0))
preds = torch.argmax(outputs[0][0].cpu(), dim=1)
was_masked = labels.cpu() != -100
preds = torch.where(was_masked, preds, -100)
num_preds = torch.sum(was_masked).item()
p_female.append(len(torch.where(preds==0)[0])/num_preds*100)
p_male.append(len(torch.where(preds==1)[0])/num_preds*100)
dfs.append(pd.DataFrame({f"%f_{prefix}": p_female, f"%m_{prefix}": p_male}))
results = pd.concat(dfs, axis=1).set_index("year")
female_df = results.filter(regex=".*f_")
female_df_for_plot = (
female_df.reset_index()
) # Gradio timeseries requires x-axis as column?
male_df = results.filter(regex=".*m_")
male_df_for_plot = (
male_df.reset_index()
) # Gradio timeseries requires x-axis as column?
return (
target_text,
female_df_for_plot,
female_df,
male_df_for_plot,
male_df,
)
title = "Changing Gender Pronouns"
description = """
This is a demo for a project exploring possible spurious correlations in training datasets that can be exploited and manipulated to achieve alternative outcomes. In this case, manipulating `DATE` to change the predicted gender pronouns for both the BERT base model and a model fine-tuned with a specific pronoun predicting task using the [wiki-bio](https://huggingface.co/datasets/wiki_bio) dataset.
One way to explain phenomena is by looking at a likely data generating process for biographical-like data in both the main BERT training dataset as well as the `wiki_bio` dataset, in the form of a causal DAG.
In the DAG, we can see that `birth_place`, `birth_date` and `gender` are all independent elements that have no common cause with the other covariates in the DAG. However `birth_place`, `birth_date` and `gender` may all have a role in causing one's `access_to_resources`, with the general trend that `access_to_resources` has become less gender-dependent over time, but not in every `birth_place`, with recent events in Afghanistan providing a stark counterexample to this trend. `access_to_resources` further determines how or if at all, you may appear in the dataset’s `context_words`.
We also argue that although there are complex causal interactions between words in a segment, the `context_words` are more likely to cause the `gender_pronouns`, rather than vice versa. For example, if the subject is a famous doctor and the object is her wealthy father, these context words will determine which person is being referred to, and thus which gendered-pronoun to use.
In this graph, any pink path between `context_words` and `gender_pronouns` will allow the flow of statistical correlation (regardless of direction of the causal arrow), inviting confounding and thus spurious correlations into the trained model.
<center>
<img src="https://www.dropbox.com/s/x60r43h7uwztnru/generic_ds_dag.png?raw=1"
alt="DAG of possible data generating process for datasets used in training.">
</center>
Those familiar with causal DAGs may note when can simply condition on `gender` to block any confounding between the `context_words` and the `gender_pronouns`. However, this is not always possible, particularly in generative or mask-filling tasks, like those common in language models.
Here, we automatically mask (for prediction) the following tokens (and they will also be automatically masked if you use them below.)
```
gendered_lists = [
['he', 'she'],
['him', 'her'],
['his', 'hers'],
['male', 'female'],
['man', 'woman'],
['men', 'women'],
["husband", "wife"],
]
```
In this demo we are looking for a dose-response relationship between:
- our treatment: the text,
- and our outcome: the predicted gender of pronouns in the text.
Specifically we are seeing if making larger magnitude intervention: an older `DATE` in the text will result in a larger magnitude effect in the outcome: higher percentage of predicted female pronouns.
In the demo below you can select among 4 different fine-tuning methods:
- which, if any, conditioning variable was appended to the text.
And two different weighting schemes that were used in the loss function to nudge more toward the minority class in the dataset:
- female pronouns.
"""
article = "Check out [main colab notebook](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/14ce4KD6PrCIL60Eng-t79tEI1UP-DHGz?usp=sharing#scrollTo=Mg1tUeHLRLaG) \
with a lot more details about this method and implementation."
gr.Interface(
fn=predict_gender_pronouns,
inputs=[
gr.inputs.Number(
default=10,
label="Number of points (years) plotted -- select fewer if slow.",
),
gr.inputs.CheckboxGroup(
CONDITIONING_VARIABLES,
default=["none", "birth_date"],
type="value",
label="Pick model(s) that were trained with the following conditioning variables",
),
gr.inputs.CheckboxGroup(
FEMALE_WEIGHTS,
default=[5],
type="value",
label="Pick model(s) that were trained with the following loss function weight on female predictions",
),
gr.inputs.Textbox(
lines=7,
label="Input Text. Include one of more instance of the word 'DATE' below, to be replace with a range of dates in demo.",
default="Born DATE, she was a computer scientist. Her work was greatly respected, and she was well-regarded in her field.",
),
],
outputs=[
gr.outputs.Textbox(type="auto", label="Sample target text fed to model"),
gr.outputs.Timeseries(
x="year",
label="Precent pred female pronoun vs year, per model trained with conditioning and with weight for female preds",
),
gr.outputs.Dataframe(
overflow_row_behaviour="show_ends",
label="Precent pred female pronoun vs year, per model trained with conditioning and with weight for female preds",
),
gr.outputs.Timeseries(
x="year",
label="Precent pred male pronoun vs year, per model trained with conditioning and with weight for female preds",
),
gr.outputs.Dataframe(
overflow_row_behaviour="show_ends",
label="Precent pred male pronoun vs year, per model trained with conditioning and with weight for female preds",
),
],
title = title,
description = description,
article = article
).launch()