kenken999's picture
fda
0f43f8a
raw
history blame
36.1 kB
import os
import openai
import time
import sys
from typing import List, Dict, Union
from dotenv import load_dotenv
import json
import subprocess
import platform
from embeddings import Embeddings
# Set Variables
load_dotenv()
current_directory = os.getcwd()
os_version = platform.release()
openai_calls_retried = 0
max_openai_calls_retries = 3
# Set API Keys
OPENAI_API_KEY = os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY", "")
assert OPENAI_API_KEY, "OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable is missing from .env"
openai.api_key = OPENAI_API_KEY
OPENAI_API_MODEL = os.getenv("OPENAI_API_MODEL", "gpt-3.5-turbo")
assert OPENAI_API_MODEL, "OPENAI_API_MODEL environment variable is missing from .env"
if "gpt-4" in OPENAI_API_MODEL.lower():
print(
f"\033[91m\033[1m"
+ "\n*****USING GPT-4. POTENTIALLY EXPENSIVE. MONITOR YOUR COSTS*****"
+ "\033[0m\033[0m"
)
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
OBJECTIVE = sys.argv[1]
elif os.path.exists(os.path.join(current_directory, "objective.txt")):
with open(os.path.join(current_directory, "objective.txt")) as f:
OBJECTIVE = f.read()
assert OBJECTIVE, "OBJECTIVE missing"
## Start of Helper/Utility functions ##
def print_colored_text(text, color):
color_mapping = {
'blue': '\033[34m',
'red': '\033[31m',
'yellow': '\033[33m',
'green': '\033[32m',
}
color_code = color_mapping.get(color.lower(), '')
reset_code = '\033[0m'
print(color_code + text + reset_code)
def print_char_by_char(text, delay=0.00001, chars_at_once=3):
for i in range(0, len(text), chars_at_once):
chunk = text[i:i + chars_at_once]
print(chunk, end='', flush=True)
time.sleep(delay)
print()
def openai_call(
prompt: str,
model: str = OPENAI_API_MODEL,
temperature: float = 0.5,
max_tokens: int = 100,
):
global openai_calls_retried
if not model.startswith("gpt-"):
# Use completion API
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=model,
prompt=prompt,
temperature=temperature,
max_tokens=max_tokens,
top_p=1,
frequency_penalty=0,
presence_penalty=0
)
return response.choices[0].text.strip()
else:
# Use chat completion API
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
try:
response = openai.ChatCompletion.create(
model=model,
messages=messages,
temperature=temperature,
max_tokens=max_tokens,
n=1,
stop=None,
)
openai_calls_retried = 0
return response.choices[0].message.content.strip()
except Exception as e:
# try again
if openai_calls_retried < max_openai_calls_retries:
openai_calls_retried += 1
print(f"Error calling OpenAI. Retrying {openai_calls_retried} of {max_openai_calls_retries}...")
return openai_call(prompt, model, temperature, max_tokens)
def execute_command_json(json_string):
try:
command_data = json.loads(json_string)
full_command = command_data.get('command')
process = subprocess.Popen(full_command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, text=True, shell=True, cwd='playground')
stdout, stderr = process.communicate(timeout=60)
return_code = process.returncode
if return_code == 0:
return stdout
else:
return stderr
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
return f"Error: Unable to decode JSON string: {str(e)}"
except subprocess.TimeoutExpired:
process.terminate()
return "Error: Timeout reached (60 seconds)"
except Exception as e:
return f"Error: {str(e)}"
def execute_command_string(command_string):
try:
result = subprocess.run(command_string, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, text=True, shell=True, cwd='playground')
output = result.stdout or result.stderr or "No output"
return output
except Exception as e:
return f"Error: {str(e)}"
def save_code_to_file(code: str, file_path: str):
full_path = os.path.join(current_directory, "playground", file_path)
try:
mode = 'a' if os.path.exists(full_path) else 'w'
with open(full_path, mode, encoding='utf-8') as f:
f.write(code + '\n\n')
except:
pass
def refactor_code(modified_code: List[Dict[str, Union[int, str]]], file_path: str):
full_path = os.path.join(current_directory, "playground", file_path)
with open(full_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
lines = f.readlines()
for modification in modified_code:
start_line = modification["start_line"]
end_line = modification["end_line"]
modified_chunk = modification["modified_code"].splitlines()
# Remove original lines within the range
del lines[start_line - 1:end_line]
# Insert the new modified_chunk lines
for i, line in enumerate(modified_chunk):
lines.insert(start_line - 1 + i, line + "\n")
with open(full_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
f.writelines(lines)
def split_code_into_chunks(file_path: str, chunk_size: int = 50) -> List[Dict[str, Union[int, str]]]:
full_path = os.path.join(current_directory, "playground", file_path)
with open(full_path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
lines = f.readlines()
chunks = []
for i in range(0, len(lines), chunk_size):
start_line = i + 1
end_line = min(i + chunk_size, len(lines))
chunk = {"start_line": start_line, "end_line": end_line, "code": "".join(lines[i:end_line])}
chunks.append(chunk)
return chunks
## End of Helper/Utility functions ##
## TASKS AGENTS ##
def code_tasks_initializer_agent(objective: str):
prompt = f"""You are an AGI agent responsible for creating a detailed JSON checklist of tasks that will guide other AGI agents to complete a given programming objective. Your task is to analyze the provided objective and generate a well-structured checklist with a clear starting point and end point, as well as tasks broken down to be very specific, clear, and executable by other agents without the context of other tasks.
The current agents work as follows:
- code_writer_agent: Writes code snippets or functions and saves them to the appropriate files. This agent can also append code to existing files if required.
- code_refactor_agent: Responsible for modifying and refactoring existing code to meet the requirements of the task.
- command_executor_agent: Executes terminal commands for tasks such as creating directories, installing dependencies, etc.
Keep in mind that the agents cannot open files in text editors, and tasks should be designed to work within these agent capabilities.
Here is the programming objective you need to create a checklist for: {objective}.
To generate the checklist, follow these steps:
1. Analyze the objective to identify the high-level requirements and goals of the project. This will help you understand the scope and create a comprehensive checklist.
2. Break down the objective into smaller, highly specific tasks that can be worked on independently by other agents. Ensure that the tasks are designed to be executed by the available agents (code_writer_agent, code_refactor and command_executor_agent) without requiring opening files in text editors.
3. Assign a unique ID to each task for easy tracking and organization. This will help the agents to identify and refer to specific tasks in the checklist.
4. Organize the tasks in a logical order, with a clear starting point and end point. The starting point should represent the initial setup or groundwork necessary for the project, while the end point should signify the completion of the objective and any finalization steps.
5. Provide the current context for each task, which should be sufficient for the agents to understand and execute the task without referring to other tasks in the checklist. This will help agents avoid task duplication.
6. Pay close attention to the objective and make sure the tasks implement all necessary pieces needed to make the program work.
7. Compile the tasks into a well-structured JSON format, ensuring that it is easy to read and parse by other AGI agents. The JSON should include fields such as task ID, description and file_path.
IMPORTANT: BE VERY CAREFUL WITH IMPORTS AND MANAGING MULTIPLE FILES. REMEMBER EACH AGENT WILL ONLY SEE A SINGLE TASK. ASK YOURSELF WHAT INFORMATION YOU NEED TO INCLUDE IN THE CONTEXT OF EACH TASK TO MAKE SURE THE AGENT CAN EXECUTE THE TASK WITHOUT SEEING THE OTHER TASKS OR WHAT WAS ACCOMPLISHED IN OTHER TASKS.
Pay attention to the way files are passed in the tasks, always use full paths. For example 'project/main.py'.
Make sure tasks are not duplicated.
Do not take long and complex routes, minimize tasks and steps as much as possible.
Here is a sample JSON output for a checklist:
{{
"tasks": [
{{
"id": 1,
"description": "Run a command to create the project directory named 'project'",
"file_path": "./project",
}},
{{
"id": 2,
"description": "Run a command to Install the following dependencies: 'numpy', 'pandas', 'scikit-learn', 'matplotlib'",
"file_path": "null",
}},
{{
"id": 3,
"description": "Write code to create a function named 'parser' that takes an input named 'input' of type str, [perform a specific task on it], and returns a specific output",
"file_path": "./project/main.py",
}},
...
{{
"id": N,
"description": "...",
}}
],
}}
The tasks will be executed by either of the three agents: command_executor, code_writer or code_refactor. They can't interact with programs. They can either run terminal commands or write code snippets. Their output is controlled by other functions to run the commands or save their output to code files. Make sure the tasks are compatible with the current agents. ALL tasks MUST start either with the following phrases: 'Run a command to...', 'Write code to...', 'Edit existing code to...' depending on the agent that will execute the task. RETURN JSON ONLY:"""
return openai_call(prompt, temperature=0.8, max_tokens=2000)
def code_tasks_refactor_agent(objective: str, task_list_json):
prompt = f"""You are an AGI tasks_refactor_agent responsible for adapting a task list generated by another agent to ensure the tasks are compatible with the current AGI agents. Your goal is to analyze the task list and make necessary modifications so that the tasks can be executed by the agents listed below
YOU SHOULD OUTPUT THE MODIFIED TASK LIST IN THE SAME JSON FORMAT AS THE INITIAL TASK LIST. DO NOT CHANGE THE FORMAT OF THE JSON OUTPUT. DO NOT WRITE ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE MODIFIED TASK LIST IN THE JSON FORMAT.
The current agents work as follows:
- code_writer_agent: Writes code snippets or functions and saves them to the appropriate files. This agent can also append code to existing files if required.
- code_refactor_agent: Responsible for editing current existing code/files.
- command_executor_agent: Executes terminal commands for tasks such as creating directories, installing dependencies, etc.
Here is the overall objective you need to refactor the tasks for: {objective}.
Here is the JSON task list you need to refactor for compatibility with the current agents: {task_list_json}.
To refactor the task list, follow these steps:
1. Modify the task descriptions to make them compatible with the current agents, ensuring that the tasks are self-contained, clear, and executable by the agents without additional context. You don't need to mention the agents in the task descriptions, but the tasks should be compatible with the current agents.
2. If necessary, add new tasks or remove irrelevant tasks to make the task list more suitable for the current agents.
3. Keep the JSON structure of the task list intact, maintaining the "id", "description" and "file_path" fields for each task.
4. Pay close attention to the objective and make sure the tasks implement all necessary pieces needed to make the program work.
Always specify file paths to files. Make sure tasks are not duplicated. Never write code to create files. If needed, use commands to create files and folders.
Return the updated JSON task list with the following format:
{{
"tasks": [
{{
"id": 1,
"description": "Run a commmand to create a folder named 'project' in the current directory",
"file_path": "./project",
}},
{{
"id": 2,
"description": "Write code to print 'Hello World!' with Python",
"file_path": "./project/main.py",
}},
{{
"id": 3,
"description": "Write code to create a function named 'parser' that takes an input named 'input' of type str, [perform a specific task on it], and returns a specific output",
"file_path": "./project/main.py",
}}
{{
"id": 3,
"description": "Run a command calling the script in ./project/main.py",
"file_path": "./project/main.py",
}}
...
],
}}
IMPORTANT: All tasks should start either with the following phrases: 'Run a command to...', 'Write a code to...', 'Edit the code to...' depending on the agent that will execute the task:
ALWAYS ENSURE ALL TASKS HAVE RELEVANT CONTEXT ABOUT THE CODE TO BE WRITTEN, INCLUDE DETAILS ON HOW TO CALL FUNCTIONS, CLASSES, IMPORTS, ETC. AGENTS HAVE NO VIEW OF OTHER TASKS, SO THEY NEED TO BE SELF-CONTAINED. RETURN THE JSON:"""
return openai_call(prompt, temperature=0, max_tokens=2000)
def code_tasks_details_agent(objective: str, task_list_json):
prompt = f"""You are an AGI agent responsible for improving a list of tasks in JSON format and adding ALL the necessary details to each task. These tasks will be executed individually by agents that have no idea about other tasks or what code exists in the codebase. It is FUNDAMENTAL that each task has enough details so that an individual isolated agent can execute. The metadata of the task is the only information the agents will have.
Each task should contain the details necessary to execute it. For example, if it creates a function, it needs to contain the details about the arguments to be used in that function and this needs to be consistent across all tasks.
Look at all tasks at once, and update the task description adding details to it for each task so that it can be executed by an agent without seeing the other tasks and to ensure consistency across all tasks. DETAILS ARE CRUCIAL. For example, if one task creates a class, it should have all the details about the class, including the arguments to be used in the constructor. If another task creates a function that uses the class, it should have the details about the class and the arguments to be used in the constructor.
RETURN JSON OUTPUTS ONLY.
Here is the overall objective you need to refactor the tasks for: {objective}.
Here is the task list you need to improve: {task_list_json}
RETURN THE SAME TASK LIST but with the description improved to contain the details you is adding for each task in the list. DO NOT MAKE OTHER MODIFICATIONS TO THE LIST. Your input should go in the 'description' field of each task.
RETURN JSON ONLY:"""
return openai_call(prompt, temperature=0.7, max_tokens=2000)
def code_tasks_context_agent(objective: str, task_list_json):
prompt = f"""You are an AGI agent responsible for improving a list of tasks in JSON format and adding ALL the necessary context to it. These tasks will be executed individually by agents that have no idea about other tasks or what code exists in the codebase. It is FUNDAMENTAL that each task has enough context so that an individual isolated agent can execute. The metadata of the task is the only information the agents will have.
Look at all tasks at once, and add the necessary context to each task so that it can be executed by an agent without seeing the other tasks. Remember, one agent can only see one task and has no idea about what happened in other tasks. CONTEXT IS CRUCIAL. For example, if one task creates one folder and the other tasks creates a file in that folder. The second tasks should contain the name of the folder that already exists and the information that it already exists.
This is even more important for tasks that require importing functions, classes, etc. If a task needs to call a function or initialize a Class, it needs to have the detailed arguments, etc.
Note that you should identify when imports need to happen and specify this in the context. Also, you should identify when functions/classes/etc already exist and specify this very clearly because the agents sometimes duplicate things not knowing.
Always use imports with the file name. For example, 'from my_script import MyScript'.
RETURN JSON OUTPUTS ONLY.
Here is the overall objective you need to refactor the tasks for: {objective}.
Here is the task list you need to improve: {task_list_json}
RETURN THE SAME TASK LIST but with a new field called 'isolated_context' for each task in the list. This field should be a string with the context you are adding. DO NOT MAKE OTHER MODIFICATIONS TO THE LIST.
RETURN JSON ONLY:"""
return openai_call(prompt, temperature=0.7, max_tokens=2000)
def task_assigner_recommendation_agent(objective: str, task: str):
prompt = f"""You are an AGI agent responsible for providing recommendations on which agent should be used to handle a specific task. Analyze the provided major objective of the project and a single task from the JSON checklist generated by the previous agent, and suggest the most appropriate agent to work on the task.
The overall objective is: {objective}
The current task is: {task}
The available agents are:
1. code_writer_agent: Responsible for writing code based on the task description.
2. code_refactor_agent: Responsible for editing existing code.
3. command_executor_agent: Responsible for executing commands and handling file operations, such as creating, moving, or deleting files.
When analyzing the task, consider the following tips:
- Pay attention to keywords in the task description that indicate the type of action required, such as "write", "edit", "run", "create", "move", or "delete".
- Keep the overall objective in mind, as it can help you understand the context of the task and guide your choice of agent.
- If the task involves writing new code or adding new functionality, consider using the code_writer_agent.
- If the task involves modifying or optimizing existing code, consider using the code_refactor_agent.
- If the task involves file operations, command execution, or running a script, consider using the command_executor_agent.
Based on the task and overall objective, suggest the most appropriate agent to work on the task."""
return openai_call(prompt, temperature=0.5, max_tokens=2000)
def task_assigner_agent(objective: str, task: str, recommendation: str):
prompt = f"""You are an AGI agent responsible for choosing the best agent to work on a given task. Your goal is to analyze the provided major objective of the project and a single task from the JSON checklist generated by the previous agent, and choose the best agent to work on the task.
The overall objective is: {objective}
The current task is: {task}
Use this recommendation to guide you: {recommendation}
The available agents are:
1. code_writer_agent: Responsible for writing code based on the task description.
2. code_refactor_agent: Responsible for editing existing code.
2. command_executor_agent: Responsible for executing commands and handling file operations, such as creating, moving, or deleting files.
Please consider the task description and the overall objective when choosing the most appropriate agent. Keep in mind that creating a file and writing code are different tasks. If the task involves creating a file, like "calculator.py" but does not mention writing any code inside it, the command_executor_agent should be used for this purpose. The code_writer_agent should only be used when the task requires writing or adding code to a file. The code_refactor_agent should only be used when the task requires modifying existing code.
TLDR: To create files, use command_executor_agent, to write text/code to files, use code_writer_agent, to modify existing code, use code_refactor_agent.
Choose the most appropriate agent to work on the task and return a JSON output with the following format: {{"agent": "agent_name"}}. ONLY return JSON output:"""
return openai_call(prompt, temperature=0, max_tokens=2000)
def command_executor_agent(task: str, file_path: str):
prompt = f"""You are an AGI agent responsible for executing a given command on the {os_version} OS. Your goal is to analyze the provided major objective of the project and a single task from the JSON checklist generated by the previous agent, and execute the command on the {os_version} OS.
The current task is: {task}
File or folder name referenced in the task (relative file path): {file_path}
Based on the task, write the appropriate command to execute on the {os_version} OS. Make sure the command is relevant to the task and objective. For example, if the task is to create a new folder, the command should be 'mkdir new_folder_name'. Return the command as a JSON output with the following format: {{"command": "command_to_execute"}}. ONLY return JSON output:"""
return openai_call(prompt, temperature=0, max_tokens=2000)
def code_writer_agent(task: str, isolated_context: str, context_code_chunks):
prompt = f"""You are an AGI agent responsible for writing code to accomplish a given task. Your goal is to analyze the provided major objective of the project and a single task from the JSON checklist generated by the previous agent, and write the necessary code to complete the task.
The current task is: {task}
To help you make the code useful in this codebase, use this context as reference of the other pieces of the codebase that are relevant to your task. PAY ATTENTION TO THIS: {isolated_context}
The following code chunks were found to be relevant to the task. You can use them as reference to write the code if they are useful. PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THIS:
{context_code_chunks}
Note: Always use 'encoding='utf-8'' when opening files with open().
Based on the task and objective, write the appropriate code to achieve the task. Make sure the code is relevant to the task and objective, and follows best practices. Return the code as a plain text output and NOTHING ELSE. Use identation and line breaks in the in the code. Make sure to only write the code and nothing else as your output will be saved directly to the file by other agent. IMPORTANT" If the task is asking you to write code to write files, this is a mistake! Interpret it and either do nothing or return the plain code, not a code to write file, not a code to write code, etc."""
return openai_call(prompt, temperature=0, max_tokens=2000)
def code_refactor_agent(task_description: str, existing_code_snippet: str, context_chunks, isolated_context: str):
prompt = f"""You are an AGI agent responsible for refactoring code to accomplish a given task. Your goal is to analyze the provided major objective of the project, the task descriptionm and refactor the code accordingly.
The current task description is: {task_description}
To help you make the code useful in this codebase, use this context as reference of the other pieces of the codebase that are relevant to your task: {isolated_context}
Here are some context chunks that might be relevant to the task:
{context_chunks}
Existing code you should refactor:
{existing_code_snippet}
Based on the task description, objective, refactor the existing code to achieve the task. Make sure the refactored code is relevant to the task and objective, follows best practices, etc.
Return a plain text code snippet with your refactored code. IMPORTANT: JUST RETURN CODE, YOUR OUTPUT WILL BE ADDED DIRECTLY TO THE FILE BY OTHER AGENT. BE MINDFUL OF THIS:"""
return openai_call(prompt, temperature=0, max_tokens=2000)
def file_management_agent(objective: str, task: str, current_directory_files: str, file_path: str):
prompt = f"""You are an AGI agent responsible for managing files in a software project. Your goal is to analyze the provided major objective of the project and a single task from the JSON checklist generated by the previous agent, and determine the appropriate file path and name for the generated code.
The overall objective is: {objective}
The current task is: {task}
Specified file path (relative path from the current dir): {file_path}
Make the file path adapted for the current directory files. The current directory files are: {current_directory_files}. Assume this file_path will be interpreted from the root path of the directory.
Do not use '.' or './' in the file path.
BE VERY SPECIFIC WITH THE FILES, AVOID FILE DUPLICATION, AVOID SPECIFYING THE SAME FILE NAME UNDER DIFFERENT FOLDERS, ETC.
Based on the task, determine the file path and name for the generated code. Return the file path and name as a JSON output with the following format: {{"file_path": "file_path_and_name"}}. ONLY return JSON output:"""
return openai_call(prompt, temperature=0, max_tokens=2000)
def code_relevance_agent(objective: str, task_description: str, code_chunk: str):
prompt = f"""You are an AGI agent responsible for evaluating the relevance of a code chunk in relation to a given task. Your goal is to analyze the provided major objective of the project, the task description, and the code chunk, and assign a relevance score from 0 to 10, where 0 is completely irrelevant and 10 is highly relevant.
The overall objective is: {objective}
The current task description is: {task_description}
The code chunk is as follows (line numbers included):
{code_chunk}
Based on the task description, objective, and code chunk, assign a relevance score between 0 and 10 (inclusive) for the code chunk. DO NOT OUTPUT ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE RELEVANCE SCORE AS A NUMBER."""
relevance_score = openai_call(prompt, temperature=0.5, max_tokens=50)
return json.dumps({"relevance_score": relevance_score.strip()})
def task_human_input_agent(task: str, human_feedback: str):
prompt = f"""You are an AGI agent responsible for getting human input to improve the quality of tasks in a software project. Your goal is to analyze the provided task and adapt it based on the human's suggestions. The tasks should start with either 'Run a command to...', 'Write code to...', or 'Edit existing code to...' depending on the agent that will execute the task.
For context, this task will be executed by other AGI agents with the following characteristics:
- code_writer_agent: Writes code snippets or functions and saves them to the appropriate files. This agent can also append code to existing files if required.
- code_refactor_agent: Responsible for modifying and refactoring existing code to meet the requirements of the task.
- command_executor_agent: Executes terminal commands for tasks such as creating directories, installing dependencies, etc.
The current task is:
{task}
The human feedback is:
{human_feedback}
If the human feedback is empty, return the task as is. If the human feedback is saying to ignore the task, return the following string: <IGNORE_TASK>
Note that your output will replace the existing task, so make sure that your output is a valid task that starts with one of the required phrases ('Run a command to...', 'Write code to...', 'Edit existing code to...').
Please adjust the task based on the human feedback while ensuring it starts with one of the required phrases ('Run a command to...', 'Write code to...', 'Edit existing code to...'). Return the improved task as a plain text output and nothing else. Write only the new task."""
return openai_call(prompt, temperature=0.3, max_tokens=200)
## END OF AGENTS ##
print_colored_text(f"****Objective****", color='green')
print_char_by_char(OBJECTIVE, 0.00001, 10)
# Create the tasks
print_colored_text("*****Working on tasks*****", "red")
print_colored_text(" - Creating initial tasks", "yellow")
task_agent_output = code_tasks_initializer_agent(OBJECTIVE)
print_colored_text(" - Reviewing and refactoring tasks to fit agents", "yellow")
task_agent_output = code_tasks_refactor_agent(OBJECTIVE, task_agent_output)
print_colored_text(" - Adding relevant technical details to the tasks", "yellow")
task_agent_output = code_tasks_details_agent(OBJECTIVE, task_agent_output)
print_colored_text(" - Adding necessary context to the tasks", "yellow")
task_agent_output = code_tasks_context_agent(OBJECTIVE, task_agent_output)
print()
print_colored_text("*****TASKS*****", "green")
print_char_by_char(task_agent_output, 0.00000001, 10)
# Task list
task_json = json.loads(task_agent_output)
embeddings = Embeddings(current_directory)
for task in task_json["tasks"]:
task_description = task["description"]
task_isolated_context = task["isolated_context"]
print_colored_text("*****TASK*****", "yellow")
print_char_by_char(task_description)
print_colored_text("*****TASK CONTEXT*****", "yellow")
print_char_by_char(task_isolated_context)
# HUMAN FEEDBACK
# Uncomment below to enable human feedback before each task. This can be used to improve the quality of the tasks,
# skip tasks, etc. I believe it may be very relevant in future versions that may have more complex tasks and could
# allow a ton of automation when working on large projects.
#
# Get user input as a feedback to the task_description
# print_colored_text("*****TASK FEEDBACK*****", "yellow")
# user_input = input("\n>:")
# task_description = task_human_input_agent(task_description, user_input)
# if task_description == "<IGNORE_TASK>":
# continue
# print_colored_text("*****IMPROVED TASK*****", "green")
# print_char_by_char(task_description)
# Assign the task to an agent
task_assigner_recommendation = task_assigner_recommendation_agent(OBJECTIVE, task_description)
task_agent_output = task_assigner_agent(OBJECTIVE, task_description, task_assigner_recommendation)
print_colored_text("*****ASSIGN*****", "yellow")
print_char_by_char(task_agent_output)
chosen_agent = json.loads(task_agent_output)["agent"]
if chosen_agent == "command_executor_agent":
command_executor_output = command_executor_agent(task_description, task["file_path"])
print_colored_text("*****COMMAND*****", "green")
print_char_by_char(command_executor_output)
command_execution_output = execute_command_json(command_executor_output)
else:
# CODE AGENTS
if chosen_agent == "code_writer_agent":
# Compute embeddings for the codebase
# This will recompute embeddings for all files in the 'playground' directory
print_colored_text("*****RETRIEVING RELEVANT CODE CONTEXT*****", "yellow")
embeddings.compute_repository_embeddings()
relevant_chunks = embeddings.get_relevant_code_chunks(task_description, task_isolated_context)
current_directory_files = execute_command_string("ls")
file_management_output = file_management_agent(OBJECTIVE, task_description, current_directory_files, task["file_path"])
print_colored_text("*****FILE MANAGEMENT*****", "yellow")
print_char_by_char(file_management_output)
file_path = json.loads(file_management_output)["file_path"]
code_writer_output = code_writer_agent(task_description, task_isolated_context, relevant_chunks)
print_colored_text("*****CODE*****", "green")
print_char_by_char(code_writer_output)
# Save the generated code to the file the agent selected
save_code_to_file(code_writer_output, file_path)
elif chosen_agent == "code_refactor_agent":
# The code refactor agent works with multiple agents:
# For each task, the file_management_agent is used to select the file to edit.Then, the
# code_relevance_agent is used to select the relevant code chunks from that filewith the
# goal of finding the code chunk that is most relevant to the task description. This is
# the code chunk that will be edited. Finally, the code_refactor_agent is used to edit
# the code chunk.
current_directory_files = execute_command_string("ls")
file_management_output = file_management_agent(OBJECTIVE, task_description, current_directory_files, task["file_path"])
file_path = json.loads(file_management_output)["file_path"]
print_colored_text("*****FILE MANAGEMENT*****", "yellow")
print_char_by_char(file_management_output)
# Split the code into chunks and get the relevance scores for each chunk
code_chunks = split_code_into_chunks(file_path, 80)
print_colored_text("*****ANALYZING EXISTING CODE*****", "yellow")
relevance_scores = []
for chunk in code_chunks:
score = code_relevance_agent(OBJECTIVE, task_description, chunk["code"])
relevance_scores.append(score)
# Select the most relevant chunk
selected_chunk = sorted(zip(relevance_scores, code_chunks), key=lambda x: x[0], reverse=True)[0][1]
# Refactor the code
modified_code_output = code_refactor_agent(task_description, selected_chunk, context_chunks=[selected_chunk], isolated_context=task_isolated_context)
# Extract the start_line and end_line of the selected chunk. This will be used to replace the code in the original file
start_line = selected_chunk["start_line"]
end_line = selected_chunk["end_line"]
# Count the number of lines in the modified_code_output
modified_code_lines = modified_code_output.count("\n") + 1
# Create a dictionary with the necessary information for the refactor_code function
modified_code_info = {
"start_line": start_line,
"end_line": start_line + modified_code_lines - 1,
"modified_code": modified_code_output
}
print_colored_text("*****REFACTORED CODE*****", "green")
print_char_by_char(modified_code_output)
# Save the refactored code to the file
refactor_code([modified_code_info], file_path)