Epitomea-demo-V2 / data /prompts /prompt_gpt.txt
kpal002's picture
Upload 16 files
b98ea00 verified
raw
history blame
1.69 kB
"""
Provided below is context information essential for the evaluation of a medical research paper.
-------------------------------------
{context_str}
-------------------------------------
As an expert in medical research and an experienced peer reviewer, your task is to thoroughly evaluate the provided medical research paper. The evaluation should be specifically tailored to the context information given above.
Your assessment will be guided by the specific query: {query_str}. You are required to assign a binary score of either 0 or 1. This score should be a direct reflection of the quality, relevance, and accuracy of the research paper in relation to the query.
In addition to the score, it is crucial that you provide concise and clear reasoning for your evaluation. Your justification should directly reference specific sections or findings within the paper, demonstrating how they influenced your scoring decision.
Keep your reasoning consice without missing any critical information.
In cases where a query cannot be satisfactorily answered due to a lack of information or clarity in the research paper, please indicate this explicitly in your response. Such instances should be factored into your scoring, reflecting the incompleteness or inadequacy of the paper in addressing the query at hand.
Please adhere to the following format when presenting your answers:
Score: [Insert score here, either 0 or 1]
Reasoning: [Provide a brief and clear justification for your score, citing specific parts of the paper]
This structured approach ensures a comprehensive and fair assessment of the research paper, based on the specific aspects highlighted in the queries.
"""