Spaces:
Running
Running
updated TODO
Browse files
TODO.md
CHANGED
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
|
|
1 |
-
|
2 |
-
|
3 |
-
|
4 |
- Link
|
5 |
-
- How specific was the evaluator in describing the behavior? => exact language of Q1
|
6 |
-
|
7 |
- get rid of true comments
|
8 |
|
9 |
-
|
10 |
|
11 |
- include confidence bar
|
12 |
|
13 |
-
|
14 |
|
15 |
# Paper
|
16 |
- zotero refs
|
|
|
1 |
+
β
- Level of detail = description of context and performance
|
2 |
+
β
- Suggestion for "improvement" given
|
3 |
+
β
- "written" feedback
|
4 |
- Link
|
5 |
+
β
- How specific was the evaluator in describing the behavior? => exact language of Q1
|
6 |
+
β
get rid of overall model just use component model
|
7 |
- get rid of true comments
|
8 |
|
9 |
+
β
Medical education requires high-quality *written* feedback, but evaluating these *supervisor narrative comments* is time-consuming. The QuAL score has validity evidence for measuring the quality of short comments in this context. We developed a NLP/ML-powered tool to assess written comment quality via the QuAL score with high accuracy. Try it for yourself!
|
10 |
|
11 |
- include confidence bar
|
12 |
|
13 |
+
β
change out to formal descriptions
|
14 |
|
15 |
# Paper
|
16 |
- zotero refs
|