Disable summary generation at the end
Browse files
app.py
CHANGED
@@ -470,84 +470,85 @@ if summarize_button:
|
|
470 |
for current_drawing_list in total_unmatched_deps:
|
471 |
render_dependency_parsing(current_drawing_list)
|
472 |
|
473 |
-
#
|
474 |
-
|
475 |
-
st.
|
476 |
-
|
477 |
-
|
478 |
-
|
479 |
-
|
480 |
-
|
481 |
-
st.markdown(
|
482 |
-
|
483 |
-
|
484 |
-
|
485 |
-
|
486 |
-
|
487 |
-
|
488 |
-
|
489 |
-
|
490 |
-
|
491 |
-
|
492 |
-
|
493 |
-
|
494 |
-
|
495 |
-
|
496 |
-
|
497 |
-
|
498 |
-
|
499 |
-
|
500 |
-
|
501 |
-
|
502 |
-
|
503 |
-
|
504 |
-
|
505 |
-
|
506 |
-
|
507 |
-
|
508 |
-
|
509 |
-
|
510 |
-
|
511 |
-
|
512 |
-
|
513 |
-
|
514 |
-
|
515 |
-
|
516 |
-
|
517 |
-
|
518 |
-
|
519 |
-
|
520 |
-
|
521 |
-
|
522 |
-
|
523 |
-
|
524 |
-
|
525 |
-
|
526 |
-
|
527 |
-
|
528 |
-
|
529 |
-
|
530 |
-
|
531 |
-
|
532 |
-
|
533 |
-
|
534 |
-
|
535 |
-
|
536 |
-
|
537 |
-
|
538 |
-
|
539 |
-
|
540 |
-
|
541 |
-
|
542 |
-
|
543 |
-
|
544 |
-
|
545 |
-
|
546 |
-
|
547 |
-
|
548 |
-
|
549 |
-
|
550 |
-
|
|
|
551 |
|
552 |
# session = SessionState.get(code=print("TEST"))
|
553 |
# a = st.radio("Edit or show", ['Edit', 'Show'], 1)
|
|
|
470 |
for current_drawing_list in total_unmatched_deps:
|
471 |
render_dependency_parsing(current_drawing_list)
|
472 |
|
473 |
+
# CURRENTLY DISABLED
|
474 |
+
# # OUTRO/CONCLUSION
|
475 |
+
# st.header("π€ Bringing it together")
|
476 |
+
# st.markdown("We have presented 2 methods that try to detect errors in summaries via post-processing steps. Entity "
|
477 |
+
# "matching can be used to solve hallucinations, while dependency comparison can be used to filter out "
|
478 |
+
# "some bad sentences (and thus worse summaries). These methods highlight the possibilities of "
|
479 |
+
# "post-processing AI-made summaries, but are only a first introduction. As the methods were "
|
480 |
+
# "empirically tested they are definitely not sufficiently robust for general use-cases.")
|
481 |
+
# st.markdown("####")
|
482 |
+
# st.markdown(
|
483 |
+
# "Below we generate 3 different kind of summaries, and based on the two discussed methods, their errors are "
|
484 |
+
# "detected to estimate a factualness score. Based on this basic approach, "
|
485 |
+
# "the best summary (read: the one that a human would prefer or indicate as the best one) "
|
486 |
+
# "will hopefully be at the top. Summaries with the same scores will get the same rank displayed.")
|
487 |
+
# st.markdown("####")
|
488 |
+
#
|
489 |
+
# with st.spinner("Calculating more summaries and scoring them, this might take a minute or two..."):
|
490 |
+
# summaries_list = []
|
491 |
+
# deduction_points = []
|
492 |
+
# # ENTITIES
|
493 |
+
# _, amount_unmatched = get_and_compare_entities(False)
|
494 |
+
#
|
495 |
+
# # DEPS
|
496 |
+
# summary_deps = check_dependency(False)
|
497 |
+
# article_deps = check_dependency(True)
|
498 |
+
# total_unmatched_deps = []
|
499 |
+
# for summ_dep in summary_deps:
|
500 |
+
# if not any(summ_dep['identifier'] in art_dep['identifier'] for art_dep in article_deps):
|
501 |
+
# total_unmatched_deps.append(summ_dep)
|
502 |
+
#
|
503 |
+
# summaries_list.append(st.session_state.summary_output)
|
504 |
+
# deduction_points.append(len(amount_unmatched) + len(total_unmatched_deps))
|
505 |
+
#
|
506 |
+
# # FOR NEW GENERATED SUMMARY
|
507 |
+
# st.session_state.summary_output = generate_abstractive_summary(st.session_state.article_text,
|
508 |
+
# type="beam",
|
509 |
+
# do_sample=True, num_beams=15,
|
510 |
+
# no_repeat_ngram_size=5)
|
511 |
+
# _, amount_unmatched = get_and_compare_entities(False)
|
512 |
+
#
|
513 |
+
# summary_deps = check_dependency(False)
|
514 |
+
# article_deps = check_dependency(True)
|
515 |
+
# total_unmatched_deps = []
|
516 |
+
# for summ_dep in summary_deps:
|
517 |
+
# if not any(summ_dep['identifier'] in art_dep['identifier'] for art_dep in article_deps):
|
518 |
+
# total_unmatched_deps.append(summ_dep)
|
519 |
+
#
|
520 |
+
# summaries_list.append(st.session_state.summary_output)
|
521 |
+
# deduction_points.append(len(amount_unmatched) + len(total_unmatched_deps))
|
522 |
+
#
|
523 |
+
# # FOR NEW GENERATED SUMMARY
|
524 |
+
# st.session_state.summary_output = generate_abstractive_summary(st.session_state.article_text,
|
525 |
+
# type="top_p",
|
526 |
+
# do_sample=True,
|
527 |
+
# no_repeat_ngram_size=5)
|
528 |
+
# _, amount_unmatched = get_and_compare_entities(False)
|
529 |
+
#
|
530 |
+
# summary_deps = check_dependency(False)
|
531 |
+
# article_deps = check_dependency(True)
|
532 |
+
# total_unmatched_deps = []
|
533 |
+
# for summ_dep in summary_deps:
|
534 |
+
# if not any(summ_dep['identifier'] in art_dep['identifier'] for art_dep in article_deps):
|
535 |
+
# total_unmatched_deps.append(summ_dep)
|
536 |
+
#
|
537 |
+
# summaries_list.append(st.session_state.summary_output)
|
538 |
+
# deduction_points.append(len(amount_unmatched) + len(total_unmatched_deps))
|
539 |
+
#
|
540 |
+
# # RANKING AND SHOWING THE SUMMARIES
|
541 |
+
# deduction_points, summaries_list = (list(t) for t in zip(*sorted(zip(deduction_points, summaries_list))))
|
542 |
+
#
|
543 |
+
# cur_rank = 1
|
544 |
+
# rank_downgrade = 0
|
545 |
+
# for i in range(len(deduction_points)):
|
546 |
+
# st.write(f'π Rank {cur_rank} summary: π', display_summary(summaries_list[i]), unsafe_allow_html=True)
|
547 |
+
# if i < len(deduction_points) - 1:
|
548 |
+
# rank_downgrade += 1
|
549 |
+
# if not deduction_points[i + 1] == deduction_points[i]:
|
550 |
+
# cur_rank += rank_downgrade
|
551 |
+
# rank_downgrade = 0
|
552 |
|
553 |
# session = SessionState.get(code=print("TEST"))
|
554 |
# a = st.radio("Edit or show", ['Edit', 'Show'], 1)
|