You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
Sir Lenny Henry recently turned his talents to singing the blues - arguably a surprising move for a comedian. But, as he tells the BBC, there's more to the blues than singing about being miserable. By Steven McIntoshEntertainment reporter Sir Lenny Henry has little left to prove. He's a successful comedian, a respected stage actor and a well-known campaigner for racial diversity in the entertainment industry. He was knighted last year and will receive a special Bafta at this Sunday's TV awards ceremony. So why has he decided to venture into the music industry and become a blues singer? "Because I've been making music and singing and performing since I was 16 and I've always wanted to make an album," he explains. "I've always loved the blues and I've grown to appreciate it more as I've got older. And I think that's what happens with the blues." Last year, he filmed a three-part documentary for Sky Arts, called Lenny Henry's Got The Blues. In the final episode, he was seen performing with his Blackacre Road Band - the positive reaction to which led to the album's recording. But, considering Sir Lenny first became famous in the late 1970s, why has he waited until now to turn his attention to music? "When we were filming the documentary, Ruby Turner described a blues song as being like a nervous breakdown in three minutes, so I think life experience lends itself to the blues. "You get a sense of growth, who you are and where you're at." It's a genre which hasn't ever been as big in the UK as in the US. The average British person may well be able to describe its sound and name a few famous blues artists - but not many would have it in their record collection. "As Tom Jones said to me, the blues was seen as something of the old guard," Sir Lenny says, explaining the genre's lower record sales in Britain. "It was too tied in with slavery and poverty and miserable stuff for a certain generation. But my experience in the 20th Century is that the blues is not just about being miserable, it's also about standing on a piano and shaking your behind. "I wanted to go into it with the celebratory nature of it - I didn't want to go into it with the feeling of writing about the most depressing things that have ever happened to me." Noticeably, Sir Lenny sings not in his regular speaking accent, but with more of an American inflection. "I always sing in a semi-American accent because R&B and blues lends itself to that. I think if I was a folk singer it would be different, I'd sing like Lenny Henry from Dudley. "But because black people invented the form I don't have a problem with adopting an American accent to sing certain songs." Diversity 'progress' Sir Lenny has become known in recent years as a diversity campaigner, calling for proportionate representation of ethnic minorities in the entertainment industry. In 2014, he delivered the Bafta Television lecture, where he said radical change was needed both in front of and behind the camera. Later that same year he guest edited the Today programme, overseeing the first ever edition of the BBC Radio 4 show not to feature a single white speaker. Arguably progress has been made since Sir Lenny's 2014 speech. Last month, police drama Undercover became the first ever BBC One drama to be broadcast which featured two non-white leads. Sophie Okonedo and Adrian Lester appear in the series, which sees Okonedo's character on the brink of becoming the first black director of public prosecutions. But, given the relevance of the characters' ethnicity to the storyline, it is not quite the sea change Sir Lenny was hoping for. "You know what, it's on [TV] and it's progress. It would be churlish to criticise it because it's a black-centred storyline," he says. "Maybe the next thing that somebody else writes will have a couple where it doesn't matter whether they're black or not. "But in the course of this, yes, it is essential to the plot and Peter Moffat is a great writer, so on we go." Progress may well be occurring in television, but Hollywood has also been criticised for its lack of ethnic diversity - most notably at this year's Oscars. The Academy promised to diversify its membership as a result of the "Oscars So White" controversy, but it could take some time before we see Hollywood movies with exclusively non-white lead roles. Actor Don Cheadle recently commented it was difficult to get funding for Miles Ahead, the Miles Davis biopic he directed and starred in, without a white actor prominently involved. Ewan McGregor was eventually cast in a lead role. "I think it's difficult to get anything with an urban storyline to be produced on a big scale, because urban by its very nature sounds like it's marginalised, not the mainstream," Sir Lenny says. "There are some good-hearted people who will fund voices from the margins, but the general rule in movies - particularly because it's such a lot of money that they're investing - is that they want a sure bet, they want a guaranteed audience. "So in the case of producing a Miles Davis movie, I'd say even though Miles is a cultural icon, it would be seen as a risk subject matter. "You've got to know what the parameters are, the funds you need, and you've got to work clearly within those parameters, otherwise you're not going to get your movie made." Sir Lenny is clearly not a fan of such parameters himself. With blues singing and beyond, he will invariably continue to break down boundaries for some time to come. New Millennium Blues by Lenny Henry is out now.

Here is a summary requirement:
Describe the influence of the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" on his decision to record an album.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (a):
The positive reaction to Sir Lenny Henry's performance with his Blackacre Road Band in the final episode of the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" influenced his decision to record an album. The documentary allowed him to explore his love for blues music and showcase his singing talent, leading to the creation of his album "New Millennium Blues."

# Output (b):
The Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" had a big influence on Sir Lenny Henry's decision to record an album of blues music. The positive reaction to his performance in the final episode of the documentary led him to believe that there was an audience for his music. He has always loved the blues and wanted to make an album, but he felt that now was the right time to do it because he has the life experience that lends itself well to the genre.

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (a)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
Sir Lenny Henry recently turned his talents to singing the blues - arguably a surprising move for a comedian. But, as he tells the BBC, there's more to the blues than singing about being miserable. By Steven McIntoshEntertainment reporter Sir Lenny Henry has little left to prove. He's a successful comedian, a respected stage actor and a well-known campaigner for racial diversity in the entertainment industry. He was knighted last year and will receive a special Bafta at this Sunday's TV awards ceremony. So why has he decided to venture into the music industry and become a blues singer? "Because I've been making music and singing and performing since I was 16 and I've always wanted to make an album," he explains. "I've always loved the blues and I've grown to appreciate it more as I've got older. And I think that's what happens with the blues." Last year, he filmed a three-part documentary for Sky Arts, called Lenny Henry's Got The Blues. In the final episode, he was seen performing with his Blackacre Road Band - the positive reaction to which led to the album's recording. But, considering Sir Lenny first became famous in the late 1970s, why has he waited until now to turn his attention to music? "When we were filming the documentary, Ruby Turner described a blues song as being like a nervous breakdown in three minutes, so I think life experience lends itself to the blues. "You get a sense of growth, who you are and where you're at." It's a genre which hasn't ever been as big in the UK as in the US. The average British person may well be able to describe its sound and name a few famous blues artists - but not many would have it in their record collection. "As Tom Jones said to me, the blues was seen as something of the old guard," Sir Lenny says, explaining the genre's lower record sales in Britain. "It was too tied in with slavery and poverty and miserable stuff for a certain generation. But my experience in the 20th Century is that the blues is not just about being miserable, it's also about standing on a piano and shaking your behind. "I wanted to go into it with the celebratory nature of it - I didn't want to go into it with the feeling of writing about the most depressing things that have ever happened to me." Noticeably, Sir Lenny sings not in his regular speaking accent, but with more of an American inflection. "I always sing in a semi-American accent because R&B and blues lends itself to that. I think if I was a folk singer it would be different, I'd sing like Lenny Henry from Dudley. "But because black people invented the form I don't have a problem with adopting an American accent to sing certain songs." Diversity 'progress' Sir Lenny has become known in recent years as a diversity campaigner, calling for proportionate representation of ethnic minorities in the entertainment industry. In 2014, he delivered the Bafta Television lecture, where he said radical change was needed both in front of and behind the camera. Later that same year he guest edited the Today programme, overseeing the first ever edition of the BBC Radio 4 show not to feature a single white speaker. Arguably progress has been made since Sir Lenny's 2014 speech. Last month, police drama Undercover became the first ever BBC One drama to be broadcast which featured two non-white leads. Sophie Okonedo and Adrian Lester appear in the series, which sees Okonedo's character on the brink of becoming the first black director of public prosecutions. But, given the relevance of the characters' ethnicity to the storyline, it is not quite the sea change Sir Lenny was hoping for. "You know what, it's on [TV] and it's progress. It would be churlish to criticise it because it's a black-centred storyline," he says. "Maybe the next thing that somebody else writes will have a couple where it doesn't matter whether they're black or not. "But in the course of this, yes, it is essential to the plot and Peter Moffat is a great writer, so on we go." Progress may well be occurring in television, but Hollywood has also been criticised for its lack of ethnic diversity - most notably at this year's Oscars. The Academy promised to diversify its membership as a result of the "Oscars So White" controversy, but it could take some time before we see Hollywood movies with exclusively non-white lead roles. Actor Don Cheadle recently commented it was difficult to get funding for Miles Ahead, the Miles Davis biopic he directed and starred in, without a white actor prominently involved. Ewan McGregor was eventually cast in a lead role. "I think it's difficult to get anything with an urban storyline to be produced on a big scale, because urban by its very nature sounds like it's marginalised, not the mainstream," Sir Lenny says. "There are some good-hearted people who will fund voices from the margins, but the general rule in movies - particularly because it's such a lot of money that they're investing - is that they want a sure bet, they want a guaranteed audience. "So in the case of producing a Miles Davis movie, I'd say even though Miles is a cultural icon, it would be seen as a risk subject matter. "You've got to know what the parameters are, the funds you need, and you've got to work clearly within those parameters, otherwise you're not going to get your movie made." Sir Lenny is clearly not a fan of such parameters himself. With blues singing and beyond, he will invariably continue to break down boundaries for some time to come. New Millennium Blues by Lenny Henry is out now.

Here is a summary requirement:
Describe the influence of the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" on his decision to record an album.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

The positive reaction to Sir Lenny Henry's performance with his Blackacre Road Band in the final episode of the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" influenced his decision to record an album. The documentary allowed him to explore his love for blues music and showcase his singing talent, leading to the creation of his album "New Millennium Blues."

The Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" had a big influence on Sir Lenny Henry's decision to record an album of blues music. The positive reaction to his performance in the final episode of the documentary led him to believe that there was an audience for his music. He has always loved the blues and wanted to make an album, but he felt that now was the right time to do it because he has the life experience that lends itself well to the genre.


You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
Sir Lenny Henry recently turned his talents to singing the blues - arguably a surprising move for a comedian. But, as he tells the BBC, there's more to the blues than singing about being miserable. By Steven McIntoshEntertainment reporter Sir Lenny Henry has little left to prove. He's a successful comedian, a respected stage actor and a well-known campaigner for racial diversity in the entertainment industry. He was knighted last year and will receive a special Bafta at this Sunday's TV awards ceremony. So why has he decided to venture into the music industry and become a blues singer? "Because I've been making music and singing and performing since I was 16 and I've always wanted to make an album," he explains. "I've always loved the blues and I've grown to appreciate it more as I've got older. And I think that's what happens with the blues." Last year, he filmed a three-part documentary for Sky Arts, called Lenny Henry's Got The Blues. In the final episode, he was seen performing with his Blackacre Road Band - the positive reaction to which led to the album's recording. But, considering Sir Lenny first became famous in the late 1970s, why has he waited until now to turn his attention to music? "When we were filming the documentary, Ruby Turner described a blues song as being like a nervous breakdown in three minutes, so I think life experience lends itself to the blues. "You get a sense of growth, who you are and where you're at." It's a genre which hasn't ever been as big in the UK as in the US. The average British person may well be able to describe its sound and name a few famous blues artists - but not many would have it in their record collection. "As Tom Jones said to me, the blues was seen as something of the old guard," Sir Lenny says, explaining the genre's lower record sales in Britain. "It was too tied in with slavery and poverty and miserable stuff for a certain generation. But my experience in the 20th Century is that the blues is not just about being miserable, it's also about standing on a piano and shaking your behind. "I wanted to go into it with the celebratory nature of it - I didn't want to go into it with the feeling of writing about the most depressing things that have ever happened to me." Noticeably, Sir Lenny sings not in his regular speaking accent, but with more of an American inflection. "I always sing in a semi-American accent because R&B and blues lends itself to that. I think if I was a folk singer it would be different, I'd sing like Lenny Henry from Dudley. "But because black people invented the form I don't have a problem with adopting an American accent to sing certain songs." Diversity 'progress' Sir Lenny has become known in recent years as a diversity campaigner, calling for proportionate representation of ethnic minorities in the entertainment industry. In 2014, he delivered the Bafta Television lecture, where he said radical change was needed both in front of and behind the camera. Later that same year he guest edited the Today programme, overseeing the first ever edition of the BBC Radio 4 show not to feature a single white speaker. Arguably progress has been made since Sir Lenny's 2014 speech. Last month, police drama Undercover became the first ever BBC One drama to be broadcast which featured two non-white leads. Sophie Okonedo and Adrian Lester appear in the series, which sees Okonedo's character on the brink of becoming the first black director of public prosecutions. But, given the relevance of the characters' ethnicity to the storyline, it is not quite the sea change Sir Lenny was hoping for. "You know what, it's on [TV] and it's progress. It would be churlish to criticise it because it's a black-centred storyline," he says. "Maybe the next thing that somebody else writes will have a couple where it doesn't matter whether they're black or not. "But in the course of this, yes, it is essential to the plot and Peter Moffat is a great writer, so on we go." Progress may well be occurring in television, but Hollywood has also been criticised for its lack of ethnic diversity - most notably at this year's Oscars. The Academy promised to diversify its membership as a result of the "Oscars So White" controversy, but it could take some time before we see Hollywood movies with exclusively non-white lead roles. Actor Don Cheadle recently commented it was difficult to get funding for Miles Ahead, the Miles Davis biopic he directed and starred in, without a white actor prominently involved. Ewan McGregor was eventually cast in a lead role. "I think it's difficult to get anything with an urban storyline to be produced on a big scale, because urban by its very nature sounds like it's marginalised, not the mainstream," Sir Lenny says. "There are some good-hearted people who will fund voices from the margins, but the general rule in movies - particularly because it's such a lot of money that they're investing - is that they want a sure bet, they want a guaranteed audience. "So in the case of producing a Miles Davis movie, I'd say even though Miles is a cultural icon, it would be seen as a risk subject matter. "You've got to know what the parameters are, the funds you need, and you've got to work clearly within those parameters, otherwise you're not going to get your movie made." Sir Lenny is clearly not a fan of such parameters himself. With blues singing and beyond, he will invariably continue to break down boundaries for some time to come. New Millennium Blues by Lenny Henry is out now.

Here is a summary requirement:
Describe the influence of the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" on his decision to record an album.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (a):
Sir Lenny Henry's decision to record a blues album was influenced by the positive reaction to his performance with his Blackacre Road Band in the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues". The comedian and diversity campaigner has always loved the blues and appreciates its celebratory nature, rather than just its association with misery and poverty. The documentary also highlighted the genre's lower record sales in the UK, which Sir Lenny attributes to its association with the old guard and certain generations.

# Output (b):
The positive reaction to Sir Lenny Henry's performance with his Blackacre Road Band in the final episode of the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" influenced his decision to record an album. The documentary allowed him to explore his love for blues music and showcase his singing talent, leading to the creation of his album "New Millennium Blues."

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (b)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
Sir Lenny Henry recently turned his talents to singing the blues - arguably a surprising move for a comedian. But, as he tells the BBC, there's more to the blues than singing about being miserable. By Steven McIntoshEntertainment reporter Sir Lenny Henry has little left to prove. He's a successful comedian, a respected stage actor and a well-known campaigner for racial diversity in the entertainment industry. He was knighted last year and will receive a special Bafta at this Sunday's TV awards ceremony. So why has he decided to venture into the music industry and become a blues singer? "Because I've been making music and singing and performing since I was 16 and I've always wanted to make an album," he explains. "I've always loved the blues and I've grown to appreciate it more as I've got older. And I think that's what happens with the blues." Last year, he filmed a three-part documentary for Sky Arts, called Lenny Henry's Got The Blues. In the final episode, he was seen performing with his Blackacre Road Band - the positive reaction to which led to the album's recording. But, considering Sir Lenny first became famous in the late 1970s, why has he waited until now to turn his attention to music? "When we were filming the documentary, Ruby Turner described a blues song as being like a nervous breakdown in three minutes, so I think life experience lends itself to the blues. "You get a sense of growth, who you are and where you're at." It's a genre which hasn't ever been as big in the UK as in the US. The average British person may well be able to describe its sound and name a few famous blues artists - but not many would have it in their record collection. "As Tom Jones said to me, the blues was seen as something of the old guard," Sir Lenny says, explaining the genre's lower record sales in Britain. "It was too tied in with slavery and poverty and miserable stuff for a certain generation. But my experience in the 20th Century is that the blues is not just about being miserable, it's also about standing on a piano and shaking your behind. "I wanted to go into it with the celebratory nature of it - I didn't want to go into it with the feeling of writing about the most depressing things that have ever happened to me." Noticeably, Sir Lenny sings not in his regular speaking accent, but with more of an American inflection. "I always sing in a semi-American accent because R&B and blues lends itself to that. I think if I was a folk singer it would be different, I'd sing like Lenny Henry from Dudley. "But because black people invented the form I don't have a problem with adopting an American accent to sing certain songs." Diversity 'progress' Sir Lenny has become known in recent years as a diversity campaigner, calling for proportionate representation of ethnic minorities in the entertainment industry. In 2014, he delivered the Bafta Television lecture, where he said radical change was needed both in front of and behind the camera. Later that same year he guest edited the Today programme, overseeing the first ever edition of the BBC Radio 4 show not to feature a single white speaker. Arguably progress has been made since Sir Lenny's 2014 speech. Last month, police drama Undercover became the first ever BBC One drama to be broadcast which featured two non-white leads. Sophie Okonedo and Adrian Lester appear in the series, which sees Okonedo's character on the brink of becoming the first black director of public prosecutions. But, given the relevance of the characters' ethnicity to the storyline, it is not quite the sea change Sir Lenny was hoping for. "You know what, it's on [TV] and it's progress. It would be churlish to criticise it because it's a black-centred storyline," he says. "Maybe the next thing that somebody else writes will have a couple where it doesn't matter whether they're black or not. "But in the course of this, yes, it is essential to the plot and Peter Moffat is a great writer, so on we go." Progress may well be occurring in television, but Hollywood has also been criticised for its lack of ethnic diversity - most notably at this year's Oscars. The Academy promised to diversify its membership as a result of the "Oscars So White" controversy, but it could take some time before we see Hollywood movies with exclusively non-white lead roles. Actor Don Cheadle recently commented it was difficult to get funding for Miles Ahead, the Miles Davis biopic he directed and starred in, without a white actor prominently involved. Ewan McGregor was eventually cast in a lead role. "I think it's difficult to get anything with an urban storyline to be produced on a big scale, because urban by its very nature sounds like it's marginalised, not the mainstream," Sir Lenny says. "There are some good-hearted people who will fund voices from the margins, but the general rule in movies - particularly because it's such a lot of money that they're investing - is that they want a sure bet, they want a guaranteed audience. "So in the case of producing a Miles Davis movie, I'd say even though Miles is a cultural icon, it would be seen as a risk subject matter. "You've got to know what the parameters are, the funds you need, and you've got to work clearly within those parameters, otherwise you're not going to get your movie made." Sir Lenny is clearly not a fan of such parameters himself. With blues singing and beyond, he will invariably continue to break down boundaries for some time to come. New Millennium Blues by Lenny Henry is out now.

Here is a summary requirement:
Describe the influence of the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" on his decision to record an album.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

Sir Lenny Henry's decision to record a blues album was influenced by the positive reaction to his performance with his Blackacre Road Band in the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues". The comedian and diversity campaigner has always loved the blues and appreciates its celebratory nature, rather than just its association with misery and poverty. The documentary also highlighted the genre's lower record sales in the UK, which Sir Lenny attributes to its association with the old guard and certain generations.

The positive reaction to Sir Lenny Henry's performance with his Blackacre Road Band in the final episode of the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" influenced his decision to record an album. The documentary allowed him to explore his love for blues music and showcase his singing talent, leading to the creation of his album "New Millennium Blues."


You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
Sir Lenny Henry recently turned his talents to singing the blues - arguably a surprising move for a comedian. But, as he tells the BBC, there's more to the blues than singing about being miserable. By Steven McIntoshEntertainment reporter Sir Lenny Henry has little left to prove. He's a successful comedian, a respected stage actor and a well-known campaigner for racial diversity in the entertainment industry. He was knighted last year and will receive a special Bafta at this Sunday's TV awards ceremony. So why has he decided to venture into the music industry and become a blues singer? "Because I've been making music and singing and performing since I was 16 and I've always wanted to make an album," he explains. "I've always loved the blues and I've grown to appreciate it more as I've got older. And I think that's what happens with the blues." Last year, he filmed a three-part documentary for Sky Arts, called Lenny Henry's Got The Blues. In the final episode, he was seen performing with his Blackacre Road Band - the positive reaction to which led to the album's recording. But, considering Sir Lenny first became famous in the late 1970s, why has he waited until now to turn his attention to music? "When we were filming the documentary, Ruby Turner described a blues song as being like a nervous breakdown in three minutes, so I think life experience lends itself to the blues. "You get a sense of growth, who you are and where you're at." It's a genre which hasn't ever been as big in the UK as in the US. The average British person may well be able to describe its sound and name a few famous blues artists - but not many would have it in their record collection. "As Tom Jones said to me, the blues was seen as something of the old guard," Sir Lenny says, explaining the genre's lower record sales in Britain. "It was too tied in with slavery and poverty and miserable stuff for a certain generation. But my experience in the 20th Century is that the blues is not just about being miserable, it's also about standing on a piano and shaking your behind. "I wanted to go into it with the celebratory nature of it - I didn't want to go into it with the feeling of writing about the most depressing things that have ever happened to me." Noticeably, Sir Lenny sings not in his regular speaking accent, but with more of an American inflection. "I always sing in a semi-American accent because R&B and blues lends itself to that. I think if I was a folk singer it would be different, I'd sing like Lenny Henry from Dudley. "But because black people invented the form I don't have a problem with adopting an American accent to sing certain songs." Diversity 'progress' Sir Lenny has become known in recent years as a diversity campaigner, calling for proportionate representation of ethnic minorities in the entertainment industry. In 2014, he delivered the Bafta Television lecture, where he said radical change was needed both in front of and behind the camera. Later that same year he guest edited the Today programme, overseeing the first ever edition of the BBC Radio 4 show not to feature a single white speaker. Arguably progress has been made since Sir Lenny's 2014 speech. Last month, police drama Undercover became the first ever BBC One drama to be broadcast which featured two non-white leads. Sophie Okonedo and Adrian Lester appear in the series, which sees Okonedo's character on the brink of becoming the first black director of public prosecutions. But, given the relevance of the characters' ethnicity to the storyline, it is not quite the sea change Sir Lenny was hoping for. "You know what, it's on [TV] and it's progress. It would be churlish to criticise it because it's a black-centred storyline," he says. "Maybe the next thing that somebody else writes will have a couple where it doesn't matter whether they're black or not. "But in the course of this, yes, it is essential to the plot and Peter Moffat is a great writer, so on we go." Progress may well be occurring in television, but Hollywood has also been criticised for its lack of ethnic diversity - most notably at this year's Oscars. The Academy promised to diversify its membership as a result of the "Oscars So White" controversy, but it could take some time before we see Hollywood movies with exclusively non-white lead roles. Actor Don Cheadle recently commented it was difficult to get funding for Miles Ahead, the Miles Davis biopic he directed and starred in, without a white actor prominently involved. Ewan McGregor was eventually cast in a lead role. "I think it's difficult to get anything with an urban storyline to be produced on a big scale, because urban by its very nature sounds like it's marginalised, not the mainstream," Sir Lenny says. "There are some good-hearted people who will fund voices from the margins, but the general rule in movies - particularly because it's such a lot of money that they're investing - is that they want a sure bet, they want a guaranteed audience. "So in the case of producing a Miles Davis movie, I'd say even though Miles is a cultural icon, it would be seen as a risk subject matter. "You've got to know what the parameters are, the funds you need, and you've got to work clearly within those parameters, otherwise you're not going to get your movie made." Sir Lenny is clearly not a fan of such parameters himself. With blues singing and beyond, he will invariably continue to break down boundaries for some time to come. New Millennium Blues by Lenny Henry is out now.

Here is a summary requirement:
Describe the influence of the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" on his decision to record an album.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (a):
Sir Lenny Henry's decision to record a blues album was influenced by the positive reaction to his performance with his Blackacre Road Band in the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues". The comedian and diversity campaigner has always loved the blues and appreciates its celebratory nature, rather than just its association with misery and poverty. The documentary also highlighted the genre's lower record sales in the UK, which Sir Lenny attributes to its association with the old guard and certain generations.

# Output (b):
The positive reaction to Sir Lenny Henry's performance with his Blackacre Road Band in the final episode of the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" influenced his decision to record an album. The documentary allowed him to explore his love for blues music and showcase his singing talent, leading to the creation of his album "New Millennium Blues."

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (b)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
Sir Lenny Henry recently turned his talents to singing the blues - arguably a surprising move for a comedian. But, as he tells the BBC, there's more to the blues than singing about being miserable. By Steven McIntoshEntertainment reporter Sir Lenny Henry has little left to prove. He's a successful comedian, a respected stage actor and a well-known campaigner for racial diversity in the entertainment industry. He was knighted last year and will receive a special Bafta at this Sunday's TV awards ceremony. So why has he decided to venture into the music industry and become a blues singer? "Because I've been making music and singing and performing since I was 16 and I've always wanted to make an album," he explains. "I've always loved the blues and I've grown to appreciate it more as I've got older. And I think that's what happens with the blues." Last year, he filmed a three-part documentary for Sky Arts, called Lenny Henry's Got The Blues. In the final episode, he was seen performing with his Blackacre Road Band - the positive reaction to which led to the album's recording. But, considering Sir Lenny first became famous in the late 1970s, why has he waited until now to turn his attention to music? "When we were filming the documentary, Ruby Turner described a blues song as being like a nervous breakdown in three minutes, so I think life experience lends itself to the blues. "You get a sense of growth, who you are and where you're at." It's a genre which hasn't ever been as big in the UK as in the US. The average British person may well be able to describe its sound and name a few famous blues artists - but not many would have it in their record collection. "As Tom Jones said to me, the blues was seen as something of the old guard," Sir Lenny says, explaining the genre's lower record sales in Britain. "It was too tied in with slavery and poverty and miserable stuff for a certain generation. But my experience in the 20th Century is that the blues is not just about being miserable, it's also about standing on a piano and shaking your behind. "I wanted to go into it with the celebratory nature of it - I didn't want to go into it with the feeling of writing about the most depressing things that have ever happened to me." Noticeably, Sir Lenny sings not in his regular speaking accent, but with more of an American inflection. "I always sing in a semi-American accent because R&B and blues lends itself to that. I think if I was a folk singer it would be different, I'd sing like Lenny Henry from Dudley. "But because black people invented the form I don't have a problem with adopting an American accent to sing certain songs." Diversity 'progress' Sir Lenny has become known in recent years as a diversity campaigner, calling for proportionate representation of ethnic minorities in the entertainment industry. In 2014, he delivered the Bafta Television lecture, where he said radical change was needed both in front of and behind the camera. Later that same year he guest edited the Today programme, overseeing the first ever edition of the BBC Radio 4 show not to feature a single white speaker. Arguably progress has been made since Sir Lenny's 2014 speech. Last month, police drama Undercover became the first ever BBC One drama to be broadcast which featured two non-white leads. Sophie Okonedo and Adrian Lester appear in the series, which sees Okonedo's character on the brink of becoming the first black director of public prosecutions. But, given the relevance of the characters' ethnicity to the storyline, it is not quite the sea change Sir Lenny was hoping for. "You know what, it's on [TV] and it's progress. It would be churlish to criticise it because it's a black-centred storyline," he says. "Maybe the next thing that somebody else writes will have a couple where it doesn't matter whether they're black or not. "But in the course of this, yes, it is essential to the plot and Peter Moffat is a great writer, so on we go." Progress may well be occurring in television, but Hollywood has also been criticised for its lack of ethnic diversity - most notably at this year's Oscars. The Academy promised to diversify its membership as a result of the "Oscars So White" controversy, but it could take some time before we see Hollywood movies with exclusively non-white lead roles. Actor Don Cheadle recently commented it was difficult to get funding for Miles Ahead, the Miles Davis biopic he directed and starred in, without a white actor prominently involved. Ewan McGregor was eventually cast in a lead role. "I think it's difficult to get anything with an urban storyline to be produced on a big scale, because urban by its very nature sounds like it's marginalised, not the mainstream," Sir Lenny says. "There are some good-hearted people who will fund voices from the margins, but the general rule in movies - particularly because it's such a lot of money that they're investing - is that they want a sure bet, they want a guaranteed audience. "So in the case of producing a Miles Davis movie, I'd say even though Miles is a cultural icon, it would be seen as a risk subject matter. "You've got to know what the parameters are, the funds you need, and you've got to work clearly within those parameters, otherwise you're not going to get your movie made." Sir Lenny is clearly not a fan of such parameters himself. With blues singing and beyond, he will invariably continue to break down boundaries for some time to come. New Millennium Blues by Lenny Henry is out now.

Here is a summary requirement:
Describe the influence of the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" on his decision to record an album.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

Sir Lenny Henry's decision to record a blues album was influenced by the positive reaction to his performance with his Blackacre Road Band in the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues". The comedian and diversity campaigner has always loved the blues and appreciates its celebratory nature, rather than just its association with misery and poverty. The documentary also highlighted the genre's lower record sales in the UK, which Sir Lenny attributes to its association with the old guard and certain generations.

The positive reaction to Sir Lenny Henry's performance with his Blackacre Road Band in the final episode of the Sky Arts documentary "Lenny Henry's Got The Blues" influenced his decision to record an album. The documentary allowed him to explore his love for blues music and showcase his singing talent, leading to the creation of his album "New Millennium Blues."


You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
Six years after the largest treasure haul of its kind was discovered in a field, experts continue to uncover its mysteries. But what has the Staffordshire Hoard taught us about the Anglo-Saxons, and what secrets might it still hold? The items - out of almost 4,000 uncovered - reveal the work of highly skilled and technically advanced smiths. They were even capable of chemically removing alloys in gold to make it seem more golden, and producing slithers of fine, embossed foil, today too delicate to handle directly. All the items are believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported - possibly from Sri Lanka or India. "At that moment in the 7th Century, they were able to create the best of all of Europe. We truly didn't give them enough credit," conservation coordinator Pieta Greaves said. "Giving them that 'dark age' term is quite unfair." As items are painstakingly reconstructed, the best of them are being added to those already on show to the public in Stoke-on-Trent and Birmingham. The hoard Yet, possibly one of the most exciting objects in the whole hoard is yet to be reconstructed, and currently being worked on in the basement Birmingham's Museum and Art Gallery. Conservators believe a set of decorated gilded silver panels, featuring armed warriors going to battle, belong to a helmet, not dissimilar to that found at Sutton Hoo, Suffolk (pictured below). "If this is a helmet, and we're pretty certain it is, it would most likely be the helmet of a king. "They're just so rare, this would only be the sixth known one," Ms Greaves said. "The detail is such that you can even see a sense of movement, they're marching to war, fully armed," conservator Dr Giovanna Fregni said. She is responsible for analysing the precious panels. After all the pieces are assembled, the helmet will be digitally reproduced and the ultimate hope was that a reconstruction could then be made, Dr Fregni said. One theory is that some of the items in the hoard could even have been produced in the same workshop as treasures found at the Sutton Hoo burial site, Ms Greaves said. But that find pales into comparison to the sheer scale and value of the Staffordshire Hoard. "This is 60% more [Anglo-Saxon items] than everything we had in the country before," Ms Greaves said. "There are 84 pommel caps from the top of swords, but before the hoard was found there were only 20 known ones in the whole of Britain." The quality of items has also surprised researchers. While some items are "more apprentice", the overwhelming majority were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors, the project team said. "We have almost 4,000 fragments, but we think it only represents 450 to 500 objects," Ms Greaves said. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were torn and hacked apart before being buried, making the conservation team's job even more difficult. Archaeologist Chris Fern, and conservators Kayleigh Fuller and Dr Fregni are responsible for piecing together the various fragments. Ms Fuller said some objects, made up of dozens of pieces, took several days to reconstruct. Similar styles, decorations, fixing holes, cut lines and corrosion marks all help the team to understand which pieces go together - a huge jigsaw puzzle. "Part of my job is to look at every piece, weigh it, measure it and become so familiar with it that I can identify it and understand exactly where it goes," Dr Fregni said. "They're all measured in millimetres, but now I've been doing it for so long I can look at a piece under the microscope and understand straight away what it is." Despite the challenge facing the conservation team, they hope to finish their job in the next year, before the hoard is handed over for further research. When it was discovered, £900,000 was raised through a public appeal, alongside grant funding, to purchase it for the West Midlands. Further funds have been ploughed into its conservation, but £120,000 is still needed to complete the job and the project team hopes the public might come to the rescue once again. "When the hoard was actually discovered they decided to put on a little display both in Birmingham and Stoke-on-Trent. In Birmingham we had it for 19 days and 45,000 people came to see it," Ms Greaves said. "It was clear people were excited, even early on. "It takes some dedication to queue for five hours to see a bit of gold glittering among some mud." How and why the hoard came to be buried in a unremarkable field, near Burntwood, remains a mystery, however. One of the main theories is that it was collected off battlefields and used as a treasury to be dispensed like modern day coinage. "It's not a single battle, there's just too much elite warrior gear in the hoard," Ms Greaves said. "By the time you get them and all their men together, that should have been a battle we've heard of and it just doesn't exist. "When you look at poems such as Beowulf, they often mention these elite warriors with their amazing weapons and fine decoration. "But there was no archaeological proof of them, so it was thought they were made up. "But actually, the hoard is that proof."

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize what the items uncovered in Staffordshire Hoard taught us about the Anglo-Saxons.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (a):
The Staffordshire Hoard, which was discovered six years ago, has taught us that the Anglo-Saxons were highly skilled and technically advanced smiths capable of producing intricate and delicate items. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported. The hoard contains 60% more Anglo-Saxon items than everything previously known in the country, and the quality of items has surprised researchers. The overwhelming majority were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors. The hoard also provides proof of the existence of elite warriors with their amazing weapons and fine decoration, which were previously thought to be made up.

# Output (b):
The Staffordshire Hoard has revealed that the Anglo-Saxons were highly skilled and technically advanced smiths, capable of chemically removing alloys in gold to make it seem more golden and producing slithers of fine, embossed foil. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported from Sri Lanka or India. The quality of items has also surprised researchers, as they were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors. This has provided archaeological proof of the elite warriors mentioned in poems such as Beowulf.

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (b)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
Six years after the largest treasure haul of its kind was discovered in a field, experts continue to uncover its mysteries. But what has the Staffordshire Hoard taught us about the Anglo-Saxons, and what secrets might it still hold? The items - out of almost 4,000 uncovered - reveal the work of highly skilled and technically advanced smiths. They were even capable of chemically removing alloys in gold to make it seem more golden, and producing slithers of fine, embossed foil, today too delicate to handle directly. All the items are believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported - possibly from Sri Lanka or India. "At that moment in the 7th Century, they were able to create the best of all of Europe. We truly didn't give them enough credit," conservation coordinator Pieta Greaves said. "Giving them that 'dark age' term is quite unfair." As items are painstakingly reconstructed, the best of them are being added to those already on show to the public in Stoke-on-Trent and Birmingham. The hoard Yet, possibly one of the most exciting objects in the whole hoard is yet to be reconstructed, and currently being worked on in the basement Birmingham's Museum and Art Gallery. Conservators believe a set of decorated gilded silver panels, featuring armed warriors going to battle, belong to a helmet, not dissimilar to that found at Sutton Hoo, Suffolk (pictured below). "If this is a helmet, and we're pretty certain it is, it would most likely be the helmet of a king. "They're just so rare, this would only be the sixth known one," Ms Greaves said. "The detail is such that you can even see a sense of movement, they're marching to war, fully armed," conservator Dr Giovanna Fregni said. She is responsible for analysing the precious panels. After all the pieces are assembled, the helmet will be digitally reproduced and the ultimate hope was that a reconstruction could then be made, Dr Fregni said. One theory is that some of the items in the hoard could even have been produced in the same workshop as treasures found at the Sutton Hoo burial site, Ms Greaves said. But that find pales into comparison to the sheer scale and value of the Staffordshire Hoard. "This is 60% more [Anglo-Saxon items] than everything we had in the country before," Ms Greaves said. "There are 84 pommel caps from the top of swords, but before the hoard was found there were only 20 known ones in the whole of Britain." The quality of items has also surprised researchers. While some items are "more apprentice", the overwhelming majority were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors, the project team said. "We have almost 4,000 fragments, but we think it only represents 450 to 500 objects," Ms Greaves said. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were torn and hacked apart before being buried, making the conservation team's job even more difficult. Archaeologist Chris Fern, and conservators Kayleigh Fuller and Dr Fregni are responsible for piecing together the various fragments. Ms Fuller said some objects, made up of dozens of pieces, took several days to reconstruct. Similar styles, decorations, fixing holes, cut lines and corrosion marks all help the team to understand which pieces go together - a huge jigsaw puzzle. "Part of my job is to look at every piece, weigh it, measure it and become so familiar with it that I can identify it and understand exactly where it goes," Dr Fregni said. "They're all measured in millimetres, but now I've been doing it for so long I can look at a piece under the microscope and understand straight away what it is." Despite the challenge facing the conservation team, they hope to finish their job in the next year, before the hoard is handed over for further research. When it was discovered, £900,000 was raised through a public appeal, alongside grant funding, to purchase it for the West Midlands. Further funds have been ploughed into its conservation, but £120,000 is still needed to complete the job and the project team hopes the public might come to the rescue once again. "When the hoard was actually discovered they decided to put on a little display both in Birmingham and Stoke-on-Trent. In Birmingham we had it for 19 days and 45,000 people came to see it," Ms Greaves said. "It was clear people were excited, even early on. "It takes some dedication to queue for five hours to see a bit of gold glittering among some mud." How and why the hoard came to be buried in a unremarkable field, near Burntwood, remains a mystery, however. One of the main theories is that it was collected off battlefields and used as a treasury to be dispensed like modern day coinage. "It's not a single battle, there's just too much elite warrior gear in the hoard," Ms Greaves said. "By the time you get them and all their men together, that should have been a battle we've heard of and it just doesn't exist. "When you look at poems such as Beowulf, they often mention these elite warriors with their amazing weapons and fine decoration. "But there was no archaeological proof of them, so it was thought they were made up. "But actually, the hoard is that proof."

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize what the items uncovered in Staffordshire Hoard taught us about the Anglo-Saxons.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

The Staffordshire Hoard, which was discovered six years ago, has taught us that the Anglo-Saxons were highly skilled and technically advanced smiths capable of producing intricate and delicate items. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported. The hoard contains 60% more Anglo-Saxon items than everything previously known in the country, and the quality of items has surprised researchers. The overwhelming majority were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors. The hoard also provides proof of the existence of elite warriors with their amazing weapons and fine decoration, which were previously thought to be made up.

The Staffordshire Hoard has revealed that the Anglo-Saxons were highly skilled and technically advanced smiths, capable of chemically removing alloys in gold to make it seem more golden and producing slithers of fine, embossed foil. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported from Sri Lanka or India. The quality of items has also surprised researchers, as they were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors. This has provided archaeological proof of the elite warriors mentioned in poems such as Beowulf.


You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
Six years after the largest treasure haul of its kind was discovered in a field, experts continue to uncover its mysteries. But what has the Staffordshire Hoard taught us about the Anglo-Saxons, and what secrets might it still hold? The items - out of almost 4,000 uncovered - reveal the work of highly skilled and technically advanced smiths. They were even capable of chemically removing alloys in gold to make it seem more golden, and producing slithers of fine, embossed foil, today too delicate to handle directly. All the items are believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported - possibly from Sri Lanka or India. "At that moment in the 7th Century, they were able to create the best of all of Europe. We truly didn't give them enough credit," conservation coordinator Pieta Greaves said. "Giving them that 'dark age' term is quite unfair." As items are painstakingly reconstructed, the best of them are being added to those already on show to the public in Stoke-on-Trent and Birmingham. The hoard Yet, possibly one of the most exciting objects in the whole hoard is yet to be reconstructed, and currently being worked on in the basement Birmingham's Museum and Art Gallery. Conservators believe a set of decorated gilded silver panels, featuring armed warriors going to battle, belong to a helmet, not dissimilar to that found at Sutton Hoo, Suffolk (pictured below). "If this is a helmet, and we're pretty certain it is, it would most likely be the helmet of a king. "They're just so rare, this would only be the sixth known one," Ms Greaves said. "The detail is such that you can even see a sense of movement, they're marching to war, fully armed," conservator Dr Giovanna Fregni said. She is responsible for analysing the precious panels. After all the pieces are assembled, the helmet will be digitally reproduced and the ultimate hope was that a reconstruction could then be made, Dr Fregni said. One theory is that some of the items in the hoard could even have been produced in the same workshop as treasures found at the Sutton Hoo burial site, Ms Greaves said. But that find pales into comparison to the sheer scale and value of the Staffordshire Hoard. "This is 60% more [Anglo-Saxon items] than everything we had in the country before," Ms Greaves said. "There are 84 pommel caps from the top of swords, but before the hoard was found there were only 20 known ones in the whole of Britain." The quality of items has also surprised researchers. While some items are "more apprentice", the overwhelming majority were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors, the project team said. "We have almost 4,000 fragments, but we think it only represents 450 to 500 objects," Ms Greaves said. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were torn and hacked apart before being buried, making the conservation team's job even more difficult. Archaeologist Chris Fern, and conservators Kayleigh Fuller and Dr Fregni are responsible for piecing together the various fragments. Ms Fuller said some objects, made up of dozens of pieces, took several days to reconstruct. Similar styles, decorations, fixing holes, cut lines and corrosion marks all help the team to understand which pieces go together - a huge jigsaw puzzle. "Part of my job is to look at every piece, weigh it, measure it and become so familiar with it that I can identify it and understand exactly where it goes," Dr Fregni said. "They're all measured in millimetres, but now I've been doing it for so long I can look at a piece under the microscope and understand straight away what it is." Despite the challenge facing the conservation team, they hope to finish their job in the next year, before the hoard is handed over for further research. When it was discovered, £900,000 was raised through a public appeal, alongside grant funding, to purchase it for the West Midlands. Further funds have been ploughed into its conservation, but £120,000 is still needed to complete the job and the project team hopes the public might come to the rescue once again. "When the hoard was actually discovered they decided to put on a little display both in Birmingham and Stoke-on-Trent. In Birmingham we had it for 19 days and 45,000 people came to see it," Ms Greaves said. "It was clear people were excited, even early on. "It takes some dedication to queue for five hours to see a bit of gold glittering among some mud." How and why the hoard came to be buried in a unremarkable field, near Burntwood, remains a mystery, however. One of the main theories is that it was collected off battlefields and used as a treasury to be dispensed like modern day coinage. "It's not a single battle, there's just too much elite warrior gear in the hoard," Ms Greaves said. "By the time you get them and all their men together, that should have been a battle we've heard of and it just doesn't exist. "When you look at poems such as Beowulf, they often mention these elite warriors with their amazing weapons and fine decoration. "But there was no archaeological proof of them, so it was thought they were made up. "But actually, the hoard is that proof."

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize what the items uncovered in Staffordshire Hoard taught us about the Anglo-Saxons.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (a):
The Staffordshire Hoard, discovered six years ago, has provided valuable insights into the Anglo-Saxons. The nearly 4,000 items found reveal the work of highly skilled and technically advanced smiths, capable of chemically removing alloys in gold and producing delicate, embossed foil. The items are believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported, possibly from Sri Lanka or India. The quality of the items suggests they were made for kings and their elite warriors. The hoard has significantly increased the number of known Anglo-Saxon artifacts and serves as archaeological proof of the elite warriors mentioned in poems such as Beowulf.

# Output (b):
The Staffordshire Hoard has revealed that the Anglo-Saxons were highly skilled and technically advanced smiths, capable of chemically removing alloys in gold to make it seem more golden and producing slithers of fine, embossed foil. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported from Sri Lanka or India. The quality of items has also surprised researchers, as they were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors. This has provided archaeological proof of the elite warriors mentioned in poems such as Beowulf.

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (a)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
Six years after the largest treasure haul of its kind was discovered in a field, experts continue to uncover its mysteries. But what has the Staffordshire Hoard taught us about the Anglo-Saxons, and what secrets might it still hold? The items - out of almost 4,000 uncovered - reveal the work of highly skilled and technically advanced smiths. They were even capable of chemically removing alloys in gold to make it seem more golden, and producing slithers of fine, embossed foil, today too delicate to handle directly. All the items are believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported - possibly from Sri Lanka or India. "At that moment in the 7th Century, they were able to create the best of all of Europe. We truly didn't give them enough credit," conservation coordinator Pieta Greaves said. "Giving them that 'dark age' term is quite unfair." As items are painstakingly reconstructed, the best of them are being added to those already on show to the public in Stoke-on-Trent and Birmingham. The hoard Yet, possibly one of the most exciting objects in the whole hoard is yet to be reconstructed, and currently being worked on in the basement Birmingham's Museum and Art Gallery. Conservators believe a set of decorated gilded silver panels, featuring armed warriors going to battle, belong to a helmet, not dissimilar to that found at Sutton Hoo, Suffolk (pictured below). "If this is a helmet, and we're pretty certain it is, it would most likely be the helmet of a king. "They're just so rare, this would only be the sixth known one," Ms Greaves said. "The detail is such that you can even see a sense of movement, they're marching to war, fully armed," conservator Dr Giovanna Fregni said. She is responsible for analysing the precious panels. After all the pieces are assembled, the helmet will be digitally reproduced and the ultimate hope was that a reconstruction could then be made, Dr Fregni said. One theory is that some of the items in the hoard could even have been produced in the same workshop as treasures found at the Sutton Hoo burial site, Ms Greaves said. But that find pales into comparison to the sheer scale and value of the Staffordshire Hoard. "This is 60% more [Anglo-Saxon items] than everything we had in the country before," Ms Greaves said. "There are 84 pommel caps from the top of swords, but before the hoard was found there were only 20 known ones in the whole of Britain." The quality of items has also surprised researchers. While some items are "more apprentice", the overwhelming majority were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors, the project team said. "We have almost 4,000 fragments, but we think it only represents 450 to 500 objects," Ms Greaves said. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were torn and hacked apart before being buried, making the conservation team's job even more difficult. Archaeologist Chris Fern, and conservators Kayleigh Fuller and Dr Fregni are responsible for piecing together the various fragments. Ms Fuller said some objects, made up of dozens of pieces, took several days to reconstruct. Similar styles, decorations, fixing holes, cut lines and corrosion marks all help the team to understand which pieces go together - a huge jigsaw puzzle. "Part of my job is to look at every piece, weigh it, measure it and become so familiar with it that I can identify it and understand exactly where it goes," Dr Fregni said. "They're all measured in millimetres, but now I've been doing it for so long I can look at a piece under the microscope and understand straight away what it is." Despite the challenge facing the conservation team, they hope to finish their job in the next year, before the hoard is handed over for further research. When it was discovered, £900,000 was raised through a public appeal, alongside grant funding, to purchase it for the West Midlands. Further funds have been ploughed into its conservation, but £120,000 is still needed to complete the job and the project team hopes the public might come to the rescue once again. "When the hoard was actually discovered they decided to put on a little display both in Birmingham and Stoke-on-Trent. In Birmingham we had it for 19 days and 45,000 people came to see it," Ms Greaves said. "It was clear people were excited, even early on. "It takes some dedication to queue for five hours to see a bit of gold glittering among some mud." How and why the hoard came to be buried in a unremarkable field, near Burntwood, remains a mystery, however. One of the main theories is that it was collected off battlefields and used as a treasury to be dispensed like modern day coinage. "It's not a single battle, there's just too much elite warrior gear in the hoard," Ms Greaves said. "By the time you get them and all their men together, that should have been a battle we've heard of and it just doesn't exist. "When you look at poems such as Beowulf, they often mention these elite warriors with their amazing weapons and fine decoration. "But there was no archaeological proof of them, so it was thought they were made up. "But actually, the hoard is that proof."

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize what the items uncovered in Staffordshire Hoard taught us about the Anglo-Saxons.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

The Staffordshire Hoard, discovered six years ago, has provided valuable insights into the Anglo-Saxons. The nearly 4,000 items found reveal the work of highly skilled and technically advanced smiths, capable of chemically removing alloys in gold and producing delicate, embossed foil. The items are believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported, possibly from Sri Lanka or India. The quality of the items suggests they were made for kings and their elite warriors. The hoard has significantly increased the number of known Anglo-Saxon artifacts and serves as archaeological proof of the elite warriors mentioned in poems such as Beowulf.

The Staffordshire Hoard has revealed that the Anglo-Saxons were highly skilled and technically advanced smiths, capable of chemically removing alloys in gold to make it seem more golden and producing slithers of fine, embossed foil. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported from Sri Lanka or India. The quality of items has also surprised researchers, as they were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors. This has provided archaeological proof of the elite warriors mentioned in poems such as Beowulf.


You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
Six years after the largest treasure haul of its kind was discovered in a field, experts continue to uncover its mysteries. But what has the Staffordshire Hoard taught us about the Anglo-Saxons, and what secrets might it still hold? The items - out of almost 4,000 uncovered - reveal the work of highly skilled and technically advanced smiths. They were even capable of chemically removing alloys in gold to make it seem more golden, and producing slithers of fine, embossed foil, today too delicate to handle directly. All the items are believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported - possibly from Sri Lanka or India. "At that moment in the 7th Century, they were able to create the best of all of Europe. We truly didn't give them enough credit," conservation coordinator Pieta Greaves said. "Giving them that 'dark age' term is quite unfair." As items are painstakingly reconstructed, the best of them are being added to those already on show to the public in Stoke-on-Trent and Birmingham. The hoard Yet, possibly one of the most exciting objects in the whole hoard is yet to be reconstructed, and currently being worked on in the basement Birmingham's Museum and Art Gallery. Conservators believe a set of decorated gilded silver panels, featuring armed warriors going to battle, belong to a helmet, not dissimilar to that found at Sutton Hoo, Suffolk (pictured below). "If this is a helmet, and we're pretty certain it is, it would most likely be the helmet of a king. "They're just so rare, this would only be the sixth known one," Ms Greaves said. "The detail is such that you can even see a sense of movement, they're marching to war, fully armed," conservator Dr Giovanna Fregni said. She is responsible for analysing the precious panels. After all the pieces are assembled, the helmet will be digitally reproduced and the ultimate hope was that a reconstruction could then be made, Dr Fregni said. One theory is that some of the items in the hoard could even have been produced in the same workshop as treasures found at the Sutton Hoo burial site, Ms Greaves said. But that find pales into comparison to the sheer scale and value of the Staffordshire Hoard. "This is 60% more [Anglo-Saxon items] than everything we had in the country before," Ms Greaves said. "There are 84 pommel caps from the top of swords, but before the hoard was found there were only 20 known ones in the whole of Britain." The quality of items has also surprised researchers. While some items are "more apprentice", the overwhelming majority were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors, the project team said. "We have almost 4,000 fragments, but we think it only represents 450 to 500 objects," Ms Greaves said. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were torn and hacked apart before being buried, making the conservation team's job even more difficult. Archaeologist Chris Fern, and conservators Kayleigh Fuller and Dr Fregni are responsible for piecing together the various fragments. Ms Fuller said some objects, made up of dozens of pieces, took several days to reconstruct. Similar styles, decorations, fixing holes, cut lines and corrosion marks all help the team to understand which pieces go together - a huge jigsaw puzzle. "Part of my job is to look at every piece, weigh it, measure it and become so familiar with it that I can identify it and understand exactly where it goes," Dr Fregni said. "They're all measured in millimetres, but now I've been doing it for so long I can look at a piece under the microscope and understand straight away what it is." Despite the challenge facing the conservation team, they hope to finish their job in the next year, before the hoard is handed over for further research. When it was discovered, £900,000 was raised through a public appeal, alongside grant funding, to purchase it for the West Midlands. Further funds have been ploughed into its conservation, but £120,000 is still needed to complete the job and the project team hopes the public might come to the rescue once again. "When the hoard was actually discovered they decided to put on a little display both in Birmingham and Stoke-on-Trent. In Birmingham we had it for 19 days and 45,000 people came to see it," Ms Greaves said. "It was clear people were excited, even early on. "It takes some dedication to queue for five hours to see a bit of gold glittering among some mud." How and why the hoard came to be buried in a unremarkable field, near Burntwood, remains a mystery, however. One of the main theories is that it was collected off battlefields and used as a treasury to be dispensed like modern day coinage. "It's not a single battle, there's just too much elite warrior gear in the hoard," Ms Greaves said. "By the time you get them and all their men together, that should have been a battle we've heard of and it just doesn't exist. "When you look at poems such as Beowulf, they often mention these elite warriors with their amazing weapons and fine decoration. "But there was no archaeological proof of them, so it was thought they were made up. "But actually, the hoard is that proof."

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize what the items uncovered in Staffordshire Hoard taught us about the Anglo-Saxons.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (a):
The Staffordshire Hoard, which was discovered six years ago, has taught us that the Anglo-Saxons were highly skilled and technically advanced smiths capable of producing intricate and delicate items. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported. The hoard contains 60% more Anglo-Saxon items than everything previously known in the country, and the quality of items has surprised researchers. The overwhelming majority were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors. The hoard also provides proof of the existence of elite warriors with their amazing weapons and fine decoration, which were previously thought to be made up.

# Output (b):
The Staffordshire Hoard, discovered six years ago, has provided valuable insights into the Anglo-Saxons. The nearly 4,000 items found reveal the work of highly skilled and technically advanced smiths, capable of chemically removing alloys in gold and producing delicate, embossed foil. The items are believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported, possibly from Sri Lanka or India. The quality of the items suggests they were made for kings and their elite warriors. The hoard has significantly increased the number of known Anglo-Saxon artifacts and serves as archaeological proof of the elite warriors mentioned in poems such as Beowulf.

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (b)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
Six years after the largest treasure haul of its kind was discovered in a field, experts continue to uncover its mysteries. But what has the Staffordshire Hoard taught us about the Anglo-Saxons, and what secrets might it still hold? The items - out of almost 4,000 uncovered - reveal the work of highly skilled and technically advanced smiths. They were even capable of chemically removing alloys in gold to make it seem more golden, and producing slithers of fine, embossed foil, today too delicate to handle directly. All the items are believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported - possibly from Sri Lanka or India. "At that moment in the 7th Century, they were able to create the best of all of Europe. We truly didn't give them enough credit," conservation coordinator Pieta Greaves said. "Giving them that 'dark age' term is quite unfair." As items are painstakingly reconstructed, the best of them are being added to those already on show to the public in Stoke-on-Trent and Birmingham. The hoard Yet, possibly one of the most exciting objects in the whole hoard is yet to be reconstructed, and currently being worked on in the basement Birmingham's Museum and Art Gallery. Conservators believe a set of decorated gilded silver panels, featuring armed warriors going to battle, belong to a helmet, not dissimilar to that found at Sutton Hoo, Suffolk (pictured below). "If this is a helmet, and we're pretty certain it is, it would most likely be the helmet of a king. "They're just so rare, this would only be the sixth known one," Ms Greaves said. "The detail is such that you can even see a sense of movement, they're marching to war, fully armed," conservator Dr Giovanna Fregni said. She is responsible for analysing the precious panels. After all the pieces are assembled, the helmet will be digitally reproduced and the ultimate hope was that a reconstruction could then be made, Dr Fregni said. One theory is that some of the items in the hoard could even have been produced in the same workshop as treasures found at the Sutton Hoo burial site, Ms Greaves said. But that find pales into comparison to the sheer scale and value of the Staffordshire Hoard. "This is 60% more [Anglo-Saxon items] than everything we had in the country before," Ms Greaves said. "There are 84 pommel caps from the top of swords, but before the hoard was found there were only 20 known ones in the whole of Britain." The quality of items has also surprised researchers. While some items are "more apprentice", the overwhelming majority were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors, the project team said. "We have almost 4,000 fragments, but we think it only represents 450 to 500 objects," Ms Greaves said. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were torn and hacked apart before being buried, making the conservation team's job even more difficult. Archaeologist Chris Fern, and conservators Kayleigh Fuller and Dr Fregni are responsible for piecing together the various fragments. Ms Fuller said some objects, made up of dozens of pieces, took several days to reconstruct. Similar styles, decorations, fixing holes, cut lines and corrosion marks all help the team to understand which pieces go together - a huge jigsaw puzzle. "Part of my job is to look at every piece, weigh it, measure it and become so familiar with it that I can identify it and understand exactly where it goes," Dr Fregni said. "They're all measured in millimetres, but now I've been doing it for so long I can look at a piece under the microscope and understand straight away what it is." Despite the challenge facing the conservation team, they hope to finish their job in the next year, before the hoard is handed over for further research. When it was discovered, £900,000 was raised through a public appeal, alongside grant funding, to purchase it for the West Midlands. Further funds have been ploughed into its conservation, but £120,000 is still needed to complete the job and the project team hopes the public might come to the rescue once again. "When the hoard was actually discovered they decided to put on a little display both in Birmingham and Stoke-on-Trent. In Birmingham we had it for 19 days and 45,000 people came to see it," Ms Greaves said. "It was clear people were excited, even early on. "It takes some dedication to queue for five hours to see a bit of gold glittering among some mud." How and why the hoard came to be buried in a unremarkable field, near Burntwood, remains a mystery, however. One of the main theories is that it was collected off battlefields and used as a treasury to be dispensed like modern day coinage. "It's not a single battle, there's just too much elite warrior gear in the hoard," Ms Greaves said. "By the time you get them and all their men together, that should have been a battle we've heard of and it just doesn't exist. "When you look at poems such as Beowulf, they often mention these elite warriors with their amazing weapons and fine decoration. "But there was no archaeological proof of them, so it was thought they were made up. "But actually, the hoard is that proof."

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize what the items uncovered in Staffordshire Hoard taught us about the Anglo-Saxons.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

The Staffordshire Hoard, which was discovered six years ago, has taught us that the Anglo-Saxons were highly skilled and technically advanced smiths capable of producing intricate and delicate items. The items, mainly gold and silver, sometimes decorated with garnets, were made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported. The hoard contains 60% more Anglo-Saxon items than everything previously known in the country, and the quality of items has surprised researchers. The overwhelming majority were most likely made for kings and their elite warriors. The hoard also provides proof of the existence of elite warriors with their amazing weapons and fine decoration, which were previously thought to be made up.

The Staffordshire Hoard, discovered six years ago, has provided valuable insights into the Anglo-Saxons. The nearly 4,000 items found reveal the work of highly skilled and technically advanced smiths, capable of chemically removing alloys in gold and producing delicate, embossed foil. The items are believed to have been made in workshops in what is now England, with only the garnets imported, possibly from Sri Lanka or India. The quality of the items suggests they were made for kings and their elite warriors. The hoard has significantly increased the number of known Anglo-Saxon artifacts and serves as archaeological proof of the elite warriors mentioned in poems such as Beowulf.